Abstract
Direct experimental observations of the interface structure can provide vital insights into heterogeneous catalysis. Examples of interface design based on single atom and surface science are, however, extremely rare. Here, we report Cu–Sn single-atom surface alloys, where isolated Sn sites with high surface densities (up to 8%) are anchored on the Cu host, for efficient electrocatalytic CO2 reduction. The unique geometric and electronic structure of the Cu–Sn surface alloys (Cu97Sn3 and Cu99Sn1) enables distinct catalytic selectivity from pure Cu100 and Cu70Sn30 bulk alloy. The Cu97Sn3 catalyst achieves a CO Faradaic efficiency of 98% at a tiny overpotential of 30 mV in an alkaline flow cell, where a high CO current density of 100 mA cm−2 is obtained at an overpotential of 340 mV. Density functional theory simulation reveals that it is not only the elemental composition that dictates the electrocatalytic reactivity of Cu–Sn alloys; the local coordination environment of atomically dispersed, isolated Cu–Sn bonding plays the most critical role.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Electrocatalytic CO2 reduction reaction (CO2RR) offers a sustainable approach to convert the greenhouse gas into value-added chemicals and fuels, and in the meantime store the intermittent renewable electricity1,2,3,4. The control over the selectivity of CO2RR is a major challenge given that it can produce up to 16 different gas and/or liquid products depending on diverse reaction pathways5,6,7,8, while competing with hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) that is thermodynamically more favorable9,10. To achieve efficient CO2RR with targeted products, the design and synthesis of catalysts with optimal bonding (not-too-strong, not-too-weak) to key intermediates are essential11. However, the mean-field behavior typically dominates the adsorption properties of heterogeneous catalysts owing to their broad electronic band structures12. As a result, the current metal-based catalysts generally follow linear scaling relationships13,14, which place fundamental limitations to catalytic performance in terms of reactivity and selectivity.
Alloy design is one promising approach towards effective tailoring of the metal catalyst’s properties. An important merit of poly-metallic materials is that the interactions between different metal atoms at the interfaces can result in significantly enhanced catalytic activity owing to both geometric and electronic effects15,16,17,18. Whereas, alloys generally follow scaling relationships19. It has been predicted that the microalloying could induce band narrowing and adsorption properties that cannot be calculated from a linear interpolation, owing to the isolated single-metal-site bonding environment12,20,21. For example, surface alloys that comprise catalytically active single atoms (e.g., Au, Pt, Pd, etc.) anchored on the host surface have shown exceptional properties for various catalytic applications22,23,24,25. With this design, no bonds form between foreign active sites; thus the intermetallic interactions occurring at the interfaces between two metals are fundamentally different from bulk alloys26. Meanwhile, their single-site nature can support the atom utilization up to 100%, which could substantially reduce the cost and tackle the scarcity issues of using precious elements. Besides, the well-defined active sites in single-atom surface alloys can provide an ideal model for mechanistic studies and enable the rational construction of catalysts through a three-pronged approach, comprising theoretical modeling, surface science, and catalyst assessment under industrially relevant conditions.
Herein, we demonstrate Cu–Sn surface alloys (Cu97Sn3 and Cu99Sn1) with isolated Sn atoms on Cu host surface by a simple sequential reduction process. Previous studies have shown that Cu–Sn alloys can realize both CO2-to-CO27,28 and CO2-to-formate reaction pathways29,30 (see Supplementary Table 2). Although insights have been gained in terms of morphology31, structure30, valence state32, and composition29, the mechanistic understanding of Cu–Sn alloys at the isolated atomic interfaces and the root behind different CO2RR pathways remain elusive. In this study, the three-dimensional atomic structure of the Cu–Sn surface alloy is established by using the atom probe tomography (APT) and high-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM). The Cu97Sn3 surface alloy exhibits near-unity selectivity for CO2-to-CO conversion, which is completely distinct from pure Cu and Cu–Sn bulk alloys. Density functional theory (DFT) simulations reveal the crucial role of the isolated Cu–Sn alloy-bonding geometry, which shows optimal absorption property of intermediates (COOH* and CO*) compared with pure Cu (too strong) or Cu70Sn30 bulk alloy (too weak).
Results
Synthesis and structural characterization
A family of Cu–Sn nanoparticles with an average size of 15 nm featuring different surface structures, were synthesized by a single-step reduction process using Cu2+, Sn2+, and NaBH4 (Fig. 1a). By controlling the content of Sn, single-atom surface alloys (e.g., Cu99Sn1 and Cu97Sn3) and Cu@Sn core-shell bulk alloy (Cu70Sn30) can be obtained, respectively. The ability to fabricate these complex structures in a single reaction step primarily stem from the sequential reduction processes, owing to the more negative standard electrode potential of Sn2+ relative to Cu2+ (Sn2+ + 2e− ⇌ Sn, E0 = −0.13 V vs. SHE; Cu2+ + 2e− ⇌ Cu, E0 = 0.34 V vs. SHE). As a result, the reduction of Cu2+ takes place first, followed by the deposition of Sn on Cu surface (or near the surface). The elemental distributions of Cu97Sn3 and Cu70Sn30 are shown in energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy mapping (Fig. 1b, c and Supplementary Fig. 2), where the surface segregation of Sn can be clearly observed. This is consistent with the HAADF-STEM that the Sn atoms preferentially anchored at the outer shell of Cu nanoparticles (Fig. 1d–f). The atomic dispersion of Sn in Cu97Sn3 can be further identified from the distributed bright spots in the HAADF-STEM image (Fig. 1e and Supplementary Fig. 3), which is in sharp contrast to the clean crystal of Cu100 (Fig. 1d). The detailed synthetic procedure for a set of Cu, Cu99Sn1, Cu97Sn3, and Cu70Sn30 samples is provided in the experimental section.
Atom probe tomography (APT) is a powerful tool to reveal the atomic configuration of catalysts by virtue of capabilities in chemical composition measurements and three-dimensional (3D) imaging at the atomic level33. APT experiments normally are terminated as a result of tip rupture due to electrical force, and therefore a smooth and compact tip has been prepared by delicate focused ion beam (FIB) annular milling to improve the tip survival during the experiment (Fig. 2a). The corresponding 3D tomography of this tip is displayed in Fig. 2b, where the content of Cu is more than an order of magnitude higher than Sn as shown in the full range mass-to-charge spectrum (Supplementary Fig. 4e), consistent with our experimental design. The Sn atoms (green dots) are thus shown in a larger size than Cu atom (purple dots) to highlight its position. Notably, the mass spectrum of Sn matches very well to the corresponding natural abundance of main isotopes (blue lines), which is a strong evidence that these peaks are not from impurities or noise (Supplementary Fig. 4f). The isolation of Sn atoms on Cu matrix can be well-distinguished from an animation (Supplementary Movie 1). In addition, we created two Sn iso-surfaces with densities of 3.53 wt.% (Fig. 2c) and 0.63 wt.% (Fig. 2d), respectively, to investigate the Sn-rich and Sn-lean region on the Cu host. The tomography demonstrates a non-uniform distribution of Sn dopants, with more Sn atoms detected on the left side. Moreover, the proxigram profile was also created based on the Sn iso-surface of 3.53 wt.% (Fig. 2e), indicating the compositional profile of Sn with respect to the distance from this iso-surface (the zero-coordinate origin of proxigram). The profile shows an even higher Sn content up to ~8% on the left side of this Sn-rich surface, which is in line with our statistic binomial analysis of Sn distribution in Fig. 2f. Besides, we projected the entire Sn atoms on xy plane (perpendicular to z-direction) by creating a 2D Sn density contour map (Fig. 2g). It is intriguing to observe that the Sn-rich region exhibits an arc-shape and a distinguishable interface with the Sn-lean region. Note that APT detects only half of the Cu97Sn3 nanoparticle, with the other half at the tip of the needle apex possibly milled away by FIB annular milling. The arc-shape interface thus can be related to the surface of Cu particles, which is doped with isolated Sn atoms. These APT results are in agreement with our surface alloy design, namely high surface densities of isolated Sn atoms are formed on the surface of Cu nanoparticles to create exposed Cu–Sn atomic interfaces.
X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of the catalysts is shown in Supplementary Fig. 5a, where the Cu100 and Cu97Sn3 exhibit identical diffraction peaks arising from the fcc structure of Cu and Cu2O, indicative of the atomic dispersion of Sn without alloy phase formed. The formation of Cu2O can be attributed to the spontaneous oxidation of Cu nanoparticle surface when exposed to the air. Note that there is no Cu2O diffraction peak observed in Cu70Sn30, possibly due to the coating of Sn layer that protects Cu from oxidation. This is also supported by the UV–vis spectroscopy (Supplementary Fig. 5b), where the coating of Sn layer on Cu70Sn30 also blocks the plasmonic signal of Cu, leading to the absence of the absorption peak at ~620 nm. As a result, the valence states of Cu on the surfaces of Cu100/Cu97Sn3 and Cu70Sn30 are estimated to be +1 and 0, respectively, as shown in Cu LMM Auger spectra (Supplementary Fig. 5c).
The Cu K edge X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) and extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) measurements were further carried out to uncover the coordination environment and electronic structure of samples. Cu foil and CuO were used as references for metallic Cu and Cu2+, respectively. The near-edge positions of Cu100, Cu97Sn3, and Cu70Sn30 catalysts are slightly higher than that of Cu foil, indicating that the bulk Cu in the three samples is in the metallic state with only surface been oxidized to Cu+ (Supplementary Fig. 6a)34. The Fourier-transformed k3-weighted spectra of the samples exhibit two major peaks at 1.5 and 2.2 Å, corresponding to Cu–O and Cu–Cu coordination shells, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 6b). The Cu–O peak is only observed in Cu97Sn3 and Cu100 catalysts, while the Cu70Sn30 displays similar peak shape compared to Cu foil with peak intensity from 4 to 5 Å significantly suppressed. This result also suggests that the surface of Cu70Sn30 was completely coated with Sn shell.
Evaluation of CO2RR performances
The selectivity, activity, and stability of Cu100, Cu97Sn3, and Cu70Sn30 for CO2RR were investigated in a CO2-saturated 0.5 M KHCO3 electrolyte (pH = 7.2). The gas and liquid products were quantified by gas chromatography (GC) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), respectively (Supplementary Fig. 7). It is worth noting that Cu–Sn alloys could be oxidized when exposed to the air. Therefore, a cyclic voltammetry (CV) pretreatment was conducted in relatively negative potentials from −0.5 to −2 V vs. RHE for ten cycles prior to CO2RR, to remove the possible surface oxides and exclude their influence on CO2RR (Supplementary Fig. 8). As confirmed by the ex situ Sn 3d XPS and Cu LMM Auger spectra, most of the oxides on Cu97Sn3 were reduced after the CV pretreatment (Supplementary Fig. 9). Figure 3a–c show potential-dependent Faradaic efficiencies (FEs) of different products obtained with Cu100, Cu97Sn3, and Cu70Sn30 catalysts. The pure Cu100 exhibits poor selectivity for CO2RR with diverse products including H2, CO, formate, and C2H4, in agreement with previous reports on Cu-based catalysts35,36. Surprisingly, with only 3% of Sn single-atoms alloyed on Cu surface, the selectivity completely changed to CO2-to-CO conversion. The onset potential obtained with the Cu97Sn3 catalyst was as low as −0.4 V, and the maximum FECO of 98% was achieved at −0.7 V. To further verify the surface alloy effect, the Cu99Sn1 was synthesized and evaluated (Supplementary Fig. 11). It is found that even with only 1% of Sn, the Cu catalyst can yield a high selectivity of ~90% for CO production. In comparison, when the content of Sn increases to 30% to form the Cu70Sn30 bulk alloy, the catalyst selectivity is switched to formate production (FE of ~90% at −1.1 V) with CO2-to-CO conversion almost suppressed. The product distribution obtained with Cu70Sn30 catalyst is similar to those for the Sn37, SnO38, and several Cu–Sn alloy electrodes29.
As shown in linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) curves (Fig. 3d), the total current densities of Cu97Sn3 outperform both Cu100 and Cu70Sn30 from −0.4 to −1.0 V vs. RHE, reaching a current density as high as 112 mA cm−2 at −1.0 V. Note that the onset potential of Cu97Sn3 decreases for ~230 mV compared to Cu70Sn30, which can be attributed to different reaction pathways and will be further discussed below. Figure 3e shows Sn-mass-normalized CO2RR partial currents obtained with Cu97Sn3 and Cu70Sn30. A high current density of 2.3 A mgSn−1 was achieved on Cu97Sn3 at −0.8 V, a value 23 times greater than that for Cu70Sn30. For the stability tests (Fig. 3f), the Cu97Sn3 exhibits a robust response with 97% retention of jCO and almost unchanged FECO, even after 20 h of consecutive electrolysis at high current densities of ~30 mA cm−2. The electrochemically active surface area (ECSA) is evaluated from double-layer capacitance (Cdl) (Supplementary Fig. S13) to elucidate the origin of diverse catalytic activity of the electrodes39,40. The Cu100, Cu97Sn3, and Cu70Sn30 show similar Cdl (2.0–2.5 mF cm−2) and ECSA, suggesting that the observed catalytic property is primarily contributed by the intrinsic reactivity of each active site, rather than a surface area effect.
To assess the performance of catalysts at industrial-relevant conditions, a home-customized flow cell based on Cu97Sn3 gas diffusion electrode was built for high current CO2RR (Supplementary Fig. 14). As shown in Fig. 4a, the polarization curve obtained with flow cell exhibits significantly reduced onset potential (~400 mV) compared with that in an H-cell, and achieves 10 mA cm−2 at only −0.19 V vs. RHE. This onset potential of CO evolution on Cu97Sn3 reaches almost its theoretical potential of −0.11 V vs. RHE41, which is the lowest among the state-of-the-art CO2-to-CO catalysts, to the best of our knowledge (Supplementary Table 3). The low overpotential can be attributed to (i) enhanced CO2 mass transport at the three-phase interfaces of catalyst, CO2 gas, and KOH electrolyte; (ii) the catalytic promotion effect of hydroxide ions, which can lower the CO2 activation energy barriers42. Fig. 4b displays the CO FEs and partial current densities plotted against the iR-corrected potentials. At a small overpotential of 30 mV, the Cu97Sn3 shows a high FECO of 98% with jCO of 2.0 mA cm−2. The jCO increases sharply with the applied potentials, reaching 100 mA cm−2 at −0.45 V with a FECO of 87%, and further exceeds 200 mA cm−2 at −0.65 V with a FECO of 67%. The overpotential of Cu97Sn3 at ~100 mA cm−2 also outperforms most, if not all, the catalysts in recent reports.
Discussion
Density functional theory (DFT) simulations
To understand the different electrocatalytic behaviors of the catalysts, the thermodynamic reaction energetics on four different models including pure Cu, Cu–Sn surface alloy, Cu–Sn bulk alloy, and Cu–Sn core-shell bulk alloy were studied using DFT simulations (Fig. 5a). The corresponding reaction pathways involve CO2–COOH*–CO*–CO (Fig. 5b), CO2–COOH*–HCOOH and CO2–OCHO*–HCOOH (Supplementary Figs. 15, 16), and H+–H*–H2 (Fig. 5c), which have been proposed for CO2RR on Cu–Sn alloys29. According to the XRD results, we used a face-centered cubic (fcc) model for Cu, and this structure has the lowest formation energies among the different phases43. Here, we considered stepped facets in our models, which have been found to be generally more active for CO2RR than flat terrace sites29,35.
On the pure Cu surface, the potential limiting steps for CO and HCOOH formation are the desorption of CO* and COOH*→HCOOH (Fig. 5b and Supplementary Fig. 16a), with the corresponding overpotentials of 0.39 and 0.24 eV, respectively. Given the tiny overpotential of 0.05 eV for HER on pure Cu (Fig. 5c), its activity and selectivity for CO2RR are poor. Besides, the strong absorption of CO* on Cu surface (−0.09 eV) is important for the formation of C2H4. When Cu–Sn surface alloy forms, the potential limiting steps for the CO and HCOOH production are the same, i.e., the formation of COOH*, with the overpotentials of 0.29 V (Supplementary Fig. 16b). Considering the much lower free energy of CO* (0.10 eV) compared with HCOOH (0.38 eV), COOH* tends to be reduced to CO* instead of HCOOH from a thermodynamics point of view. Moreover, the overpotential for HER on Cu–Sn surface alloy increases to 0.1 eV (Fig. 5c). All these results indicate that the isolated Cu–Sn bonding can tune the selectivity for CO2-to-CO conversion with suppressed HER. As for both Cu–Sn bulk alloys, the most significant changes are the increase of COOH* free energy up to 0.66 and 0.81 eV (Supplementary Fig. 16c, d), respectively. Given the much lower free energy of OCHO* compared with COOH*, the CO2-to-HCOOH conversion would dominate the CO2RR process on Cu–Sn bulk alloys. Meanwhile, due to the relatively large overpotential for HCOOH production on core-shell bulk alloy (0.53 eV, Fig. 5d), a much higher negative potential is required to achieve desired currents. Collectively, all DFT results are in line with the experimental observations that, compared with pure Cu surface, Cu97Sn3, and Cu99Sn1 surface alloys exhibit superior activity and selectivity for CO production while Cu70Sn30 bulk alloy shows excellent reactivity for formate generation at large overpotentials.
According to d-band theory, the behavior of the occupied d orbital projected on the catalyst surface tightly correlates with the local electron transfer and surface chemisorption. In the context of chemisorption of molecules to a metal surface, a more positive d-band center manifests a stronger adsorption interaction between the metal sites and the adsorbates44,45. To explain the different electrocatalytic behaviors of our catalysts, we further calculated the projected density of states (PDOS) of d orbitals and the d-band center (ɛd) of Cu atoms (Fig. 5e). The DFT calculations show an obvious left shift of PDOS of Cu d orbitals in surface alloy compared to pure Cu, and the corresponding d-band center is thus farther to the Fermi level than that on pure Cu by 0.1 eV. As a result, the bonding of COOH*, H*, and OCHO* are all weakened on isolated Cu–Sn bonding to a certain extent, which increases the UL(CO2)–UL(H2) for CO production (Supplementary Fig. 17). To sum up, the unique electrocatalytic behavior of isolated Cu–Sn atomic interfaces is attributed to the combination of geometric (different coordination environment) and electronic (change of d orbitals) effects, which can explain the different CO2RR reactivity of pure Cu, Cu97Sn3 surface alloy, and Cu70Sn30 core-shell bulk alloy.
In this work, pure Cu, single-atom surface alloys (Cu97Sn3 and Cu99Sn1), and core-shell bulk alloy (Cu70Sn30) were synthesized via a one-step sequential reduction process. Extensive structural characterizations revealed a high surface density (up to 8%), isolated Sn sites in Cu97Sn3, which is able to break the linear scaling relationship of Cu or Sn catalysts. As such, the observed distinct CO2RR selectivity and orders-of-magnitude increase in Sn-mass-normalized activity on Cu97Sn3 relative to Cu70Sn30 is understood as a result of its unique surface structure and bonding geometry. In an alkaline flow cell, we achieved a high FECO of 98% at a tiny overpotential of 30 mV and a jCO of 100 mA cm−2 at −0.45 V vs. RHE. In light of this superior performance, together with the high degree of control over the atomic structure, it is expected that the strategy could be applied for the design of various surface alloy electrocatalysts for CO2RR, as well as a range of electrochemical energy conversion reactions such as oxygen reduction, nitrogen fixation, and beyond.
Methods
Synthesis of Cu–Sn nanoparticle alloys
The Cu–Sn nanoparticles were synthesized via a simple one-step reduction method based on copper (II) chloride (CuCl2), tin (II) chloride (SnCl2), and sodium borohydride (NaBH4). Since the Cu and Sn can be easily oxidized at ambient conditions, a concentrated strong reduction solution (5 M NaBH4) was used to ensure the completed reduction. For the preparation of the Cu100 sample, 2 mL CuCl2 (300 mg) aqueous solution was rapidly added into 2 mL NaBH4 solution under ice bath and aged for 0.5 h. The as-prepared black suspension was then washed with H2O and acetone several times. After drying in vacuum at room temperature, the Cu100 nanoparticles were obtained. For the synthesis of Cu99Sn1 and Cu97Sn3, 4.1 mg and 12.3 mg SnCl2 was added into 2 mL CuCl2 (300 mg) solution, respectively, before further react with NaBH4. For the preparation of the Cu70Sn30 sample, 300 mg CuCl2 and 170.2 mg SnCl2 were added into 3.2 mL H2O and then react with NaBH4. After synthesis, all the samples were stored under vacuum at room temperature to avoid oxidation for further use. The ratio of Sn and Cu in alloys were calculated from the stoichiometry of the precursor metals in the chemical reduction process.
Characterizations
Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images were collected with a QUANTA 450. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM), high-resolution TEM (HRTEM), high-angle annular dark-field scanning TEM (HAADF-STEM) were carried out on JEOL JEM-ARM200f microscope at 200 kV. XRD was performed on a PANalytical X’Pert XRD system (45 kV, 40 mA, Cu Kα radiation). XPS results were recorded by Thermo ESCALAB250Xi. Cu LMM Auger peak was obtained by the region scan of 555–590 eV Binding Energy, which were then converted to the Kinetic Energy. UV–vis spectroscopy was carried out on Varian Cary 100 Scan double-beam UV/Vis spectrophotometer. XAFS measurement and data analysis: XAFS spectra at the Cu K-edge and Sn K-edge were collected at Beijing Synchrotron Radiation Facility and 12-BM-B at the Advanced Photon Source in Argonne National Laboratory, respectively. The Cu and Sn K-edge XANES data were recorded in a transmission mode.
Atom probe tomography (APT)
The specimen was prepared in a Zeiss Auriga scanning electron microscopy/focused ion beam (SEM/FIB) using a modified liftout technique. The particle suspension was initially made by sonicating their ethanol mixture for 15 min and was dispersed on a Si substrate. After drying out, the substrate was welded on a SEM stub and transferred into SEM for particle liftout. The particles are prone to agglomerate into clusters with different sizes, and we target the one with a size of ~500 nm in diameter to facilitate our liftout experiment. The particle was easily adhered to the in-built tungsten manipulator by electrostatics and placed onto a pretreated Mo post. Thereafter, the gas-injection-system was used to deposit a thick Pt capping layer in order to firmly consolidate the specimen. Following a step by step FIB annual milling procedure, the specimen was sharpened less than 100 nm at the apex and was ready for APT experiment.
The identity of the chemicals can be determined by measuring the time of flight of each type of atom from the sample and detector. The data visualization and analysis can be carried out in a commercial software Integrated Visualization and Analysis (IVAS) 3.8.4. In this work, a CAMECA local electrode atom probe (LEAP4000X Si) assisted with a UV laser system (35–5 nm wavelength) was used for the experiment. The experiments were conducted at 50 K temperature, and laser energy, detection rate and pulse frequency were set at 20 pJ, 0.5% and 200 kHz respectively.
Electrochemical measurements
CO2 electrolysis in H-cells was performed in a gas-tight H-cell with two-compartments separated by a cation exchange membrane (Nafion®117). A Pt plate was used as the counter electrode, a saturated calomel electrode (SCE) was used as the reference electrode, and CO2-saturated 0.5 M KHCO3 was used as the electrolyte, respectively. To prepare the working electrodes, 10 mg of catalyst and 100 μL of 5% Nafion solution were introduced into 100 μL of water and 300 μL of ethanol solution, and sonicated for 1 h. A 6.25 μL of the catalyst ink was coated onto a carbon fiber paper substrate and dried in air, giving a catalyst loading of 0.5 mg cm−2. Before testing, all the samples were electrochemically reduced by applying a high negative potential from −0.5 to −2 V vs. RHE at 50 mV s−1 for ten cycles. All LSV and potentiostatic data were corrected with an iR compensation of 80%. All potentials were calculated with respect to the reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) scale according to the Nernst equation (ERHE = ESCE + 0.0591 × pH + 0.241 V, at 25 °C).
CO2 electrolysis in flow cells at industrially relevant conditions was carried out in a home-customized flow cell. The windows for electrolysis were set to 1 cm × 1 cm. Each chamber has an inlet and an outlet for electrolyte, and a SCE reference electrode was placed in the catholyte chamber. The catalyst ink was prepared by mixing 20 mg of catalyst, 6 mL of ethanol, and 200 μL of a Nafion perfluorinated resin solution. Then, catalysts were air-brushed onto 1.5 × 1.5 cm−2 25 BC gas diffusion layer (Fuel Cell Store) electrodes with mass loading of 1.0 mg cm−2, and used as the cathode. A 1.5 × 1.5 cm−2 Ni foam was used as a counter electrode for oxygen evolution reaction. An anion exchange membrane (Dioxide Materials) was used to separate the cathode and anode chambers. 1 M KOH solution was used as the electrolytes. The catholyte and anolyte were cycled at a flow rate of 50 mL min−1 by using a peristaltic pump. The gas inlet and outlet on the cathode side were linked to a CO2 gas-flow meter (30 sccm) and a GC, respectively. The applied potentials were converted to the RHE scale with iR correction (ERHE = ESCE + 0.0591 × pH + 0.241 V + iR, at 25 °C)46.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information File or are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper.
References
Ross, M. B. et al. Designing materials for electrochemical carbon dioxide recycling. Nat. Catal. 2, 648–658 (2019).
Kibria, M. G. et al. Electrochemical CO2 reduction into chemical feedstocks: from mechanistic electrocatalysis models to system design. Adv. Mater. 31, 1807166 (2019).
Gu, J., Hsu, C.-S., Bai, L., Chen, H. M. & Hu, X. Atomically dispersed Fe3+ sites catalyze efficient CO2 electroreduction to CO. Science 364, 1091–1094 (2019).
Zhu, Q. et al. Hollow metal-organic-framework-mediated in situ architecture of copper dendrites for enhanced CO2 electroreduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 8896–8901 (2020).
Ren, W. & Zhao, C. Paths towards enhanced electrochemical CO2 reduction. Nat. Sci. Rev. 7, 7–9 (2019).
Kortlever, R., Shen, J., Schouten, K. J. P., Calle-Vallejo, F. & Koper, M. T. Catalysts and reaction pathways for the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6, 4073–4082 (2015).
Zhu, Q. et al. Carbon dioxide electroreduction to C2 products over copper-cuprous oxide derived from electrosynthesized copper complex. Nat. Commun. 10, 1–11 (2019).
Zheng, Y. et al. Understanding the roadmap for electrochemical reduction of CO2 to multi-carbon oxygenates and hydrocarbons on copper-based catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 19, 7646–7659 (2019).
Jiao, J. et al. Copper atom-pair catalyst anchored on alloy nanowires for selective and efficient electrochemical reduction of CO2. Nat. Chem. 11, 222–228 (2019).
Yang, D. et al. Selective electroreduction of carbon dioxide to methanol on copper selenide nanocatalysts. Nat. Commun. 10, 1–9 (2019).
Zhong, M. et al. Accelerated discovery of CO2 electrocatalysts using active machine learning. Nature 581, 178–183 (2020).
Greiner, M. T. et al. Free-atom-like d states in single-atom alloy catalysts. Nat. Chem. 10, 1008–1015 (2018).
Pérez-Ramírez, J. & López, N. Strategies to break linear scaling relationships. Nat. Catal. 2, 971–976 (2019).
Fernández, E. M. et al. Scaling relationships for adsorption energies on transition metal oxide, sulfide, and nitride surfaces. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47, 4683–4686 (2008).
Clark, E. L., Hahn, C., Jaramillo, T. F. & Bell, A. T. Electrochemical CO2 reduction over compressively strained CuAg surface alloys with enhanced multi-carbon oxygenate selectivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 15848–15857 (2017).
Kim, C. et al. Alloy nanocatalysts for the electrochemical oxygen reduction (ORR) and the direct electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction reaction (CO2RR). Adv. Mater. 31, 1805617 (2019).
Zhi, X., Jiao, Y., Zheng, Y., Vasileff, A. & Qiao, S.-Z. Selectivity roadmap for electrochemical CO2 reduction on copper-based alloy catalysts. Nano Energy 71, 104601 (2020).
Vasileff, A., Xu, C., Jiao, Y., Zheng, Y. & Qiao, S.-Z. Surface and interface engineering in copper-based bimetallic materials for selective CO2 electroreduction. Chem 4, 1809–1831 (2018).
Zhao, Z.-J. et al. Theory-guided design of catalytic materials using scaling relationships and reactivity descriptors. Nat. Rev. Mater. 4, 792–804 (2019).
Greeley, J. & Mavrikakis, M. Alloy catalysts designed from first principles. Nat. Mater. 3, 810–815 (2004).
Rameshan, C. et al. Subsurface-controlled CO2 selectivity of PdZn near-surface alloys in H2 generation by methanol steam reforming. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 3224–3227 (2010).
Sun, G. et al. Breaking the scaling relationship via thermally stable Pt/Cu single atom alloys for catalytic dehydrogenation. Nat. Commun. 9, 4454 (2018).
Kim, J. et al. Highly durable platinum single-atom alloy catalyst for electrochemical reactions. Adv. Energy Mater. 8, 1701476 (2018).
Marcinkowski, M. D. et al. Pt/Cu single-atom alloys as coke-resistant catalysts for efficient C–H activation. Nat. Chem. 10, 325–332 (2018).
Lucci, F. R. et al. Selective hydrogenation of 1, 3-butadiene on platinum-copper alloys at the single-atom limit. Nat. Commun. 6, 1–8 (2015).
Giannakakis, G., Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M. & Sykes, E. C. H. Single-atom alloys as a reductionist approach to the rational design of heterogeneous catalysts. Acc. Chem. Res. 52, 237–247 (2018).
Ju, W. et al. Electrocatalytic reduction of gaseous CO2 to CO on Sn/Cu-nanofiber-based gas diffusion electrodes. Adv. Energy Mater. 9, 1901514 (2019).
Li, Q. et al. Tuning Sn-catalysis for electrochemical reduction of CO2 to CO via the core/shell Cu/SnO2 structure. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 4290–4293 (2017).
Zheng, X. et al. Theory-guided Sn/Cu alloying for efficient CO2 electroreduction at low overpotentials. Nat. Catal. 2, 55–61 (2019).
Wang, P. et al. Phase and structure engineering of copper tin heterostructures for efficient electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction. Nat. Commun. 9, 4933 (2018).
Ju, W. et al. Sn-decorated Cu for selective electrochemical CO2 to CO conversion: precision architecture beyond composition design. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2, 867–872 (2018).
Li, M. et al. Modulated Sn oxidation states over Cu2O-derived substrate for selective electrochemical CO2 reduction. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 12, 22760–22770 (2020).
Miller M. K. Atom Probe Tomography: Analysis at the Atomic Level. (Springer Science & Business Media, 2012).
Nguyen-Phan, T.-D. et al. Understanding three-dimensionally interconnected porous oxide-derived copper electrocatalyst for selective carbon dioxide reduction. J. Mater. Chem. A 7, 27576–27584 (2019).
Peterson, A. A., Abild-Pedersen, F., Studt, F., Rossmeisl, J. & Nørskov, J. K. How copper catalyzes the electroreduction of carbon dioxide into hydrocarbon fuels. Energy Environ. Sci. 3, 1311–1315 (2010).
Loiudice, A. et al. Tailoring copper nanocrystals towards C2 products in electrochemical CO2 reduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 5789–5792 (2016).
Lim, J., Kang, P. W., Jeon, S. S. & Lee, H. Electrochemically deposited sn catalysts with dense tips on gas diffusion electrode for electrochemical CO2 reduction. J. Mater. Chem. A 8, 9032 (2020).
Gu, J., Héroguel, F., Luterbacher, J. & Hu, X. Densely packed, ultra small SnO nanoparticles for enhanced activity and selectivity in electrochemical CO2 reduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 2943–2947 (2018).
Li, C. W., Ciston, J. & Kanan, M. W. Electroreduction of carbon monoxide to liquid fuel on oxide-derived nanocrystalline copper. Nature 508, 504–507 (2014).
Lai, Q., Yang, N. & Yuan, G. Highly efficient In-Sn alloy catalysts for electrochemical reduction of CO2 to formate. Electrochem. Commun. 83, 24–27 (2017).
Jia, C., Dastafkan, K., Ren, W., Yang, W. & Zhao, C. Carbon-based catalysts for electrochemical CO2 reduction. Sustain. Energy Fuels 3, 2890–2906 (2019).
Dinh, C. T. et al. CO2 electroreduction to ethylene via hydroxide-mediated copper catalysis at an abrupt interface. Science 360, 783–787 (2018).
Jain, A. et al. Commentary: the materials project: a materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. Apl. Mater. 1, 011002 (2013).
Nørskov, J. K. et al. Origin of the overpotential for oxygen reduction at a fuel-cell cathode. J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 17886–17892 (2004).
Stamenkovic, V. et al. Changing the activity of electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction by tuning the surface electronic structure. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 45, 2897–2901 (2006).
Li, F. et al. Molecular tuning of CO2-to-ethylene conversion. Nature 577, 509–513 (2020).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Australian Research Council (FT170100224, DP160101713). The authors are thankful to Dr. Xianjue Chen for his help in conducting the TEM tests. The authors are thankful to BSRF (Beijing Synchrotron Radiation Facility), 12-BM-B at the Advanced Photon Source (APS) in Argonne National Laboratory, and UNSW Mark Wainwright Analytical Center for providing access to their XAFS, XRD, SEM, XPS, Raman, NMR, and facilities. The authors acknowledge the technical and scientific support of the Microscopy Australia node at the University of Sydney (Sydney Microscopy & Microanalysis). This research was also undertaken with the assistance of resources provided by the Pawsey and the National Computing Infrastructure (NCI) facility at the Australian National University; allocated through both the National Computational Merit Allocation Scheme supported by the Australian Government and the Australian Research Council grant LE190100021 (Sustaining and strengthening merit-based access at NCI, 2019-2021). This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodovska-Curie grant agreement No. 891545-ADBCRZB.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
C.Z. conceived and directed the project. W.R. designed the experiments, analyzed the results and wrote the first draft of the paper. X.T. and S.S. performed the DFT calculation. J.Q., S.R., and J.C. carried out the APT measurements. S.L., J.L., X.L., and K.W. undertook the XAFS characterization. All authors contribute to the writing of the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Peer review information Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contributions to the peer review of this work. Peer review reports are available.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Source data
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ren, W., Tan, X., Qu, J. et al. Isolated copper–tin atomic interfaces tuning electrocatalytic CO2 conversion. Nat Commun 12, 1449 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21750-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21750-y
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Turning copper into an efficient and stable CO evolution catalyst beyond noble metals
Nature Communications (2024)
-
Fundamentals and catalytic applications of single-atom alloys
Science China Materials (2024)
-
Progress of Main-Group Metal-Based Single-Atom Catalysts
Electrochemical Energy Reviews (2024)
-
Selective CO2 electrolysis to CO using isolated antimony alloyed copper
Nature Communications (2023)
-
Dual-site catalysts featuring platinum-group-metal atoms on copper shapes boost hydrocarbon formations in electrocatalytic CO2 reduction
Nature Communications (2023)