Abstract
The percentage of mean arterial pressure (%MAP) is the height of the mean arterial waveform divided by the peak amplitude of the waveform of pulse volume recording. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the cutoff value of 45% for %MAP at the ankle, which is recommended for the diagnosis of lower extremity artery disease, in combination with ankle-brachial index (ABI) is useful for detecting patients with clinical coronary artery disease (CAD) and investigate the optimal cutoff value of %MAP to diagnose patients with CAD. We measured ABI and %MAP in 2213 subjects (mean age: 61.2 ± 15.5 years). Multivariate analysis revealed that %MAP ≥ 45% was significantly associated with a higher risk of CAD after adjusting for traditional cardiovascular risk factors (odds ratio [OR], 2.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.43–3.21; p < 0.001). However, the association was no longer significant after adjusting for ABI (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 0.83–2.33; p = 0.21), whereas ABI was significantly associated with CAD (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97–0.99; p = 0.005). The optimal cutoff value of %MAP derived from a receiver operating characteristic curve to diagnose CAD was 40.3%. Multivariate analysis revealed that %MAP ≥ 40.3% was significantly associated with a higher risk of CAD (OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.19–2.24; p = 0.002) independent of ABI (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97–0.99; p = 0.002). The cutoff value of 40.3%, but not 45%, for %MAP may be useful for detecting patients with advanced atherosclerosis and for cardiovascular risk assessment independent of ABI.
Registration Information
http://www.umin.ac.jp (University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry) (UMIN000039512)
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Introduction
Measurement of ankle-brachial index (ABI), the ratio of ankle systolic blood pressure to brachial systolic blood pressure, has been widely used as a noninvasive screening method for detecting patients with lower extremity artery disease (LEAD). ABI is not only an indicator of LEAD but also an indicator of systemic atherosclerosis and, therefore, can serve as a vascular marker of atherosclerosis for cardiovascular risk assessment. Indeed, several population-based cohort studies have shown that a lower ABI is associated with higher rates of concomitant cardiovascular disease and higher incidence of cardiovascular events [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Therefore, patients with a low ABI value should be regarded as being at high cardiovascular risk.
In addition to ABI, waveforms of pulse volume recording at the ankle obtained by using a plethysmographic technique can be used for noninvasive detection of LEAD [7,8,9]. Recent advancements in oscillometric cuff technology have made it possible to simultaneously obtain accurate waveforms of pulse volume recording at the ankle in a short time when measuring ABI by using an automated oscillometric device, which can lead to clinical application of pulse volume recording parameters calculated from high-quality pulse volume waveforms. Percentage of mean arterial pressure (%MAP), one of the parameters automatically calculated from pulse volume waveforms, is the height of the mean area of the arterial waveform divided by the peak amplitude [10]. In patients with hemodynamically occlusive lesions in the lower extremity artery, the pulse volume waveform at the ankle tends to be blunted and, consequently, %MAP should increase. Indeed, the results of a clinical study have shown that %MAP at the ankle increases with increasing stenosis severity in the lower extremity artery and that the cutoff value of 45% for %MAP is proposed for the diagnosis of LEAD [10,11,12]. These findings indicate the possibility that %MAP, as well as ABI, can be used as a vascular marker for detecting patients with advanced atherosclerosis. However, there is little information on the usefulness of %MAP alone or in combination with ABI for cardiovascular risk assessment. Therefore, we investigated the association between %MAP and clinical coronary artery disease (CAD) to determine whether the cutoff value of 45% for %MAP is useful for detecting patients at high cardiovascular risk in a large number of well-characterized subjects. In addition, we investigated the optimal cutoff value of %MAP to diagnose clinical CAD.
Methods
Data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Subjects
This study was a cross-sectional study. Between January 2008 and December 2019, a total of 2749 subjects were recruited for measurements of ABI and pulse volume recording for calculation of %MAP from participants who visited the outpatient cardiology clinic or who underwent health-screening examinations at Hiroshima University Hospital. Some of the data have been previously reported elsewhere [13, 14]. Participants with severe aortic stenosis or aortic regurgitation (n = 35), atrial fibrillation (n = 183), LEAD defined as critical limb ischemia (n = 56), a history of major amputation (n = 55) or minor amputation (n = 12) or previous intervention including angioplasty or bypass graft (n = 76), and those with missing information on a history of CAD (n = 23) were excluded. Participants with an ABI ≥ 1.4 (n = 96) were further excluded. Finally, 2213 participants (1361 men and 852 women; mean age: 61.2 ± 15.5 years) with an ABI < 1.4 were enrolled in this study. Hypertension was defined as treatment with oral antihypertensive drugs or systolic blood pressure of more than 140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure of more than 90 mmHg measured in a sitting position on at least three different occasions without medication [15]. Diabetes was defined according to the American Diabetes Association recommendation [16]. Dyslipidemia was defined according to the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program [17]. Smokers were defined as those who had ever smoked. CAD was defined as a history of myocardial infarction and/or angina pectoris. Myocardial infarction was defined as organic occlusion of at least 1 coronary artery confirmed by coronary angiography (CAG) with or without a history of a coronary revascularization procedure including percutaneous coronary intervention and/or coronary artery bypass grafting. Angina pectoris was defined as organic stenosis (≥50%) of at least one coronary artery confirmed by CAG and a history of chest pain with or without a history of a coronary revascularization procedure. The vascular tests were performed without withholding medications. The ethical committees of our institutions (Hiroshima University Hospital institutional review board) approved the study protocol. Written informed consent for participation in the study was obtained from all subjects.
Study protocol
The subjects fasted the previous night for at least 8 h and abstained from consuming alcohol and caffeine and from smoking. The subjects were kept in the supine position in a quiet, dark, air-conditioned room (constant temperature of 22–26 °C) throughout the study. A 23-gauge polyethylene catheter was inserted into the left deep antecubital vein to obtain blood samples. ABI measurement and pulse wave recording were performed at least 5 min after maintaining the supine position. Vascular tests were performed by skilled and trained physicians without detailed knowledge of baseline clinical characteristics of the subjects.
ABI measurement and pulse volume recording
ABI measurement and pulse volume recording for calculating %MAP were performed using a volume-plethysmographic apparatus (Form PWV/ABI, Omron Health Care Co., Kyoto, Japan). Four oscillometric cuffs were wrapped around both upper arms and lower legs. The cuffs were connected to an oscillometric pressure sensor for measurements of blood pressure and to a plethysmographic sensor for pulse volume recordings. Blood pressure in each limb was automatically and simultaneously measured, and then waveforms of pulse volume recording in the lower limbs were automatically and simultaneously recorded. This device distinguished between pulses of the anterior tibial artery, posterior tibial artery, and peroneal artery by using frequency analysis and automatically selected and displayed the pulse with the highest oscillation. ABI was automatically calculated by dividing the ankle systolic blood pressure of the right and left sides by the higher brachial systolic blood pressure of either arm.
Waveforms of pulse volume recording were obtained by holding cuff pressure at 54 mmHg in subjects with diastolic blood pressure above 62 mmHg and by holding cuff pressure at 8 mmHg below diastolic blood pressure in subjects with diastolic blood pressure below 62 mmHg to minimize the influence of cuff pressure on hemodynamics. Pulse waveforms in the lower limbs were recorded and stored for 10 s. The %MAP was automatically calculated for each pulse waveform and the mean of %MAPs obtained in the 10-second recording was used for analyses. A beat with a pulse interval 25% shorter or longer than the previous beat interval was excluded due to the possibility of arrhythmia or body movement. The %MAP was not calculated when the number of available pulses for calculation was less than three [10]. The %MAP is the height of the mean area of the arterial waveform (P2) divided by the peak amplitude (P1) [P2/P1 × 100 (%)] (Fig. 1A). The arterial waveform should be flattened and %MAP should increase with hemodynamically significant occlusive lesions in the lower extremity artery (Fig. 1B). The reproducibility of ABI and %MAP (on visit 1 and visit 2) was assessed in 30 consecutive subjects without medication change in whom ABI and %MAP were measured twice with a six-month interval by the same experienced observer. Pearson’s correlation coefficients of ABI between visit 1 and visit 2 were 0.59 (p < 0.001) in the right leg and 0.45 (p = 0.01) in the left leg, and the coefficients of variation were 4.0% in the right leg and 4.6% in the left leg. Pearson’s correlation coefficients of %MAP between visit 1 and 2 were 0.47 (p = 0.009) in the right leg and 0.40 (p = 0.03) in the left leg, and the coefficients of variation were 4.7% in the right leg and 5.7% in the left leg.
Cutoff values of ABI and %MAP
The 2016 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines on the management of peripheral artery disease (PAD) recommend that ABI in the range of 1.00–1.40 should be classified as normal for the diagnosis of LEAD [18]. In addition, a previous study showed that low ABI (<1.00) was associated with a higher incidence of cardiovascular events than was normal ABI (1.00–1.40) [6]. Therefore, participants were divided into two groups based on the cutoff value of ABI: subjects with low ABI when ABI on either side was <1.00 and subjects with normal ABI when ABIs on both the left and right sides were ≥1.00.
To our knowledge, there has been no report in which a cutoff value of %MAP for cardiovascular disease was proposed in the general population. Therefore, in accordance with the recommended cutoff value of %MAP for diagnosis of LEAD in the 2013 Japanese Circulation Society guidelines for a noninvasive vascular function test [11] and in the 2022 Japanese Circulation Society guideline on the management of PAD [12] and a cutoff value of %MAP proposed from the results of a recent study in which the optimal cutoff value of %MAP for diagnosis of LEAD was investigated [10], participants were divided into two groups: subjects with %MAP < 45% when the %MAPs on both the left and right sides were <45% and subjects with %MAP ≥ 45% when %MAP on either side or %MAPs on both sides were ≥45%. In the present study, these cutoff values of ABI and %MAP were used for severity assessment of atherosclerosis but not for diagnosis of LEAD.
Statistical analysis
All reported p values were 2-sided, and a p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Continuous variables are summarized as means ± standard deviation and were compared by using unpaired Student t test. Categorical variables are presented as frequencies and percentages and were compared by means of the chi-square test. The Cochran–Amitage trend test was used to assess the trend of ordered categorical variables for the association between ABI and proportion of subjects with high %MAP and the association between %MAP and prevalence of CAD. Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent variables associated with high %MAP or CAD. Age, sex, body mass index (BMI), heart rate, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, smoking, hemodialysis, and ABI were entered as covariates into the model of the relationships between %MAP and variables. Age, sex, BMI, heart rate, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, smoking, and ABI were entered into the model for the association between CAD and %MAP. Multivariate analysis was performed among subjects with low ABI. Age and sex were entered into the model as covariates. To assess the diagnostic accuracy for clinical CAD, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed. The optimal cutoff value of %MAP was determined according to the highest Youden index from the ROC curve to diagnose clinical CAD. The differences in area under the curve (AUC) were compared using the method of Delong et al. [19]. The data were processed using JMP version pro 16 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).
Results
Baseline clinical characteristics
The baseline clinical characteristics of the subjects are summarized in Table 1. Of the 2213 participants, 304 (13.7%) had CAD. Mean values were 1.14 ± 0.12 for right ABI, 1.13 ± 0.13 for left ABI, 38.4 ± 4.7% for right %MAP, and 38.4 ± 4.5% for left %MAP. The proportion of patients with %MAP ≥ 45% was increased in relation to a decrease in ABI in both the left and right legs (p < 0.001) (Fig. 2). Multiple logistic regression analyses revealed that lower BMI, higher heart rate, diabetes mellitus, hemodialysis, and lower ABI were significantly associated with %MAP ≥ 45% in both the left and right legs (Supplementary Table 1).
Association between ABI and CAD
The lower ABI value of either side was used for analysis. The prevalence of CAD according to ABI had a reverse J-shaped distribution (Supplementary Fig. 1). We divided the participants into two groups according to ABI (low ABI: ABI < 1.00, normal ABI: ABI ≥ 1.00). The baseline clinical characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Of the 2213 subjects, 268 subjects (12.1%) had low ABI. The prevalence of CAD was significantly higher in subjects with low ABI than in subjects with normal ABI (24.6% vs. 12.2%, p < 0.001) (Table 1). Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that low ABI was significantly associated with a higher risk of CAD (odds ratio [OR], 1.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.27–2.69; p = 0.001) after adjustments for other traditional cardiovascular risk factors (Supplementary Table 2).
Association between %MAP and CAD
The higher %MAP value of either side was used for analysis. The prevalence of CAD increased in relation to an increase in %MAP (p < 0.001) (Fig. 3). We divided the participants into two groups according to %MAP: subjects with %MAP < 45% and patients with %MAP ≥ 45%. The baseline clinical characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Of the 2213 subjects, 241 subjects (10.9%) had %MAP ≥ 45%. The prevalence of CAD was significantly higher in patients with %MAP ≥ 45% than in subjects with %MAP < 45% (22.4% vs. 12.7%, p < 0.001) (Table 1). In an unadjusted analysis of the relationship between CAD and %MAP ≥ 45%, %MAP ≥ 45% was significantly associated with a higher risk of CAD (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.43–2.77; p < 0.001) (Table 2, unadjusted model). In a multiple logistic regression analysis of relationships between CAD and variables, %MAP ≥ 45% was significantly associated with a higher risk of CAD after adjusting for traditional cardiovascular risk factors (OR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.43–3.21; p < 0.001) (Table 2, Model 2). When the ABI value was entered into the model, there was no significant association between %MAP ≥ 45% and CAD (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 0.83–2.33; p = 0.21), whereas ABI was significantly associated with CAD (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97–0.99; p = 0.005) (Table 2, Model 3). When systolic blood pressure at the time of %MAP measurement and antihypertensive drug treatment were entered instead of hypertension into the model of the relationships between %MAP ≥ 45% and variables, the insignificant association between %MAP ≥ 45% and CAD (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.77–2.19, p = 0.33) and the significant association between ABI and CAD (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97–0.99, p = 0.001) remained unchanged (Table 2, Model 4). The AUC value of the ROC curve for ABI < 1.00 to diagnose clinical CAD was 0.56 (95% CI, 0.53–0.58) and that for %MAP ≥ 45% was 0.54 (95% CI, 0.52–0.56). The addition of %MAP ≥ 45% to ABI < 1.00 did not improve the diagnostic accuracy for clinical CAD [AUC: 0.56 (95% CI, 0.53–0.58) to 0.56 (95% CI, 0.53–0.58), p = 0.79].
When the diagnostic accuracy of %MAP and that of ABI were compared as continuous values, there was no significant difference between the AUC value of %MAP to diagnose CAD and that of ABI [AUC: 0.56 (95% CI, 0.53–0.60) vs. 0.59 (95% CI, 0.55–0.63), p = 0.19]. The addition of %MAP to ABI as a continuous value did not improve the diagnostic accuracy for clinical CAD [AUC: 0.59 (95% CI, 0.55–0.63) to 0.59 (95% CI, 0.56–0.63), p = 0.51].
Association between %MAP and CAD in subjects with normal ABI
We divided the subjects with normal ABI (≥1.00) into two groups according to the cutoff value of 45% for %MAP. The clinical characteristics are summarized in Supplementary Table 3. Of the 1945 subjects with normal ABI, 99 (5.1%) had %MAP ≥ 45%. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of CAD between subjects with %MAP < 45% and subjects with %MAP ≥ 45% (12.2% vs. 12.1%, p = 0.97) among the subjects with normal ABI (Supplementary Table 3).
Association between %MAP and CAD in patients with low ABI
We divided the subjects with low ABI (<1.00) into two groups according to the cutoff value of 45% for %MAP. The clinical characteristics are summarized in Supplementary Table 4. Of the 268 patients with low ABI, 142 (53.0%) had %MAP ≥ 45%. The prevalence of CAD was significantly higher in patients with %MAP ≥ 45% than in patients with %MAP < 45% (29.6% vs. 19.1%, p = 0.04) (Supplementary Table 4). In an unadjusted analysis of the relationship between CAD and %MAP ≥ 45%, %MAP ≥ 45% was significantly associated with a higher risk of CAD (OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.01–3.16; p = 0.04) (Supplementary Table 5, unadjusted model). In a multiple logistic regression analysis of relationships between CAD and variables, %MAP ≥ 45% was not associated with CAD after adjusting for age and sex (OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 0.86–2.98; p = 0.14) (Supplementary Table 5, Model 1).
Associations between ABI ≤ 0.90, %MAP, and CAD
To determine whether the cutoff value of the ABI affect the usefulness of %MAP, we divided the participants into two groups according to a cutoff value of 0.90 for ABI. The baseline clinical characteristics are summarized in Supplementary Table 6. Of the 2213 subjects, 142 subjects (6.4%) had ABI ≤ 0.90. The prevalence of CAD was significantly higher in subjects with ABI ≤ 0.90 than in subjects with ABI > 0.90 (31.7% vs. 12.5%, p < 0.001) (Supplementary Table 6). Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that ABI ≤ 0.90 was significantly associated with a higher risk of CAD (OR, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.82–4.59; p < 0.001) after adjustments for other traditional cardiovascular risk factors (Supplementary Table 7).
We divided the subjects with ABI > 0.90 into two groups according to a cutoff value of 45% for %MAP. The clinical characteristics are summarized in Supplementary Table 8. Of the 2071 subjects with ABI > 0.90, 132 (6.4%) had %MAP ≥ 45%. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of CAD between subjects with %MAP < 45% and subjects with %MAP ≥ 45% (12.4% vs. 13.6%, p = 0.68). We divided the subjects with ABI ≤ 0.90 into two groups according to a cutoff value of 45% for %MAP. The clinical characteristics are summarized in Supplementary Table 9. Of the 142 subjects with ABI ≤ 0.90, 109 (76.8%) had %MAP ≥ 45%. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of CAD between subjects with %MAP < 45% and subjects with %MAP ≥ 45% (27.3% vs. 33.0%, p = 0.53).
The optimal cutoff value of %MAP
The optimal cutoff value of %MAP derived from an ROC curve to diagnose clinical CAD was 40.3%. Subjects were divided into two groups according to the cutoff value of %MAP: subjects with %MAP < 40.3% (n = 1410) and subjects with %MAP ≥ 40.3% (n = 803). The clinical characteristics of subjects according to the cutoff value of %MAP are summarized in Supplementary Table 10. The prevalence of CAD was significantly higher in subjects with %MAP ≥ 40.3% than in subjects with <40.3% (18.2% vs. 11.2%, p < 0.001). In an unadjusted analysis of the relationship between CAD and %MAP ≥ 40.3%, %MAP ≥ 40.3% was significantly associated with a higher risk of CAD (OR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.38–2.25; p < 0.001) (Supplementary Table 11). When the ABI value was entered into the model, the association between %MAP ≥ 40.3% and CAD remained significant (OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.19–2.24; p = 0.002) (Supplementary Table 11, Model 3). The AUC value of the ROC curve for %MAP ≥ 40.3% was 0.57 (95% CI, 0.54–0.60). The addition of %MAP ≥ 40.4% to ABI < 1.00 significantly improved the diagnostic accuracy for clinical CAD [AUC: 0.56 (95% CI, 0.53–0.58) to 0.59 (95% CI, 0.56–0.62), p = 0.006].
Discussion
In the present study, we showed that lower ABI was significantly associated with a higher risk of clinical CAD. In addition, the proportion of patients with clinical CAD was significantly higher in patients with %MAP ≥ 45% than in patients with %MAP < 45%. Although we found a significant association between %MAP ≥ 45% and CAD in an unadjusted analysis, the association was attenuated and no longer significant after adjusting for traditional cardiovascular risk factors and ABI. Moreover, subgroup analyses showed that %MAP ≥ 45% was not associated with CAD in either subjects with normal ABI or subjects with low ABI. Furthermore, when a cutoff value of 0.9 for ABI was used, %MAP ≥ 45% was not associated with CAD in either subjects with ABI > 0.90 or subjects with ABI ≤ 0.90. However, %MAP ≥ 40.3%, the optimal cutoff value derived from an ROC curve to diagnose clinical CAD, was significantly associated with CAD even after adjusting traditional risk factors and ABI. These findings suggest that the cutoff value of 40.3%, but not 45% recommended for LEAD screening, is useful for cardiovascular risk assessment even when the ABI value is taken into account.
ABI has been used not only for the diagnosis and severity assessment of LEAD but also for cardiovascular risk assessment since ABI is not only an indicator of occlusive arterial lesions in the lower extremities but also an indicator of generalized atherosclerosis and cardiovascular prognosis. The results of previous studies showed that lower ABI is associated with a higher risk of clinical cardiovascular disease and higher incidence of cardiovascular events and that cardiovascular risk increases with decreasing ABI [4,5,6, 20, 21]. Indeed, the results of the present study showed that the proportion of patients with clinical CAD increased with decreasing ABI and that low ABI (<1.00) was significantly associated with CAD independent of traditional cardiovascular risk factors, suggesting that ABI is a useful vascular marker for cardiovascular risk assessment. However, ABI is not always reliable since ABI can be falsely normalized despite the presence of occlusive arterial lesions in the lower extremities in patients with calcified noncompressible lower limb arteries due to falsely elevated ankle systolic blood pressure, which can lead to underestimation of cardiovascular risk. Therefore, other vascular markers should be combined with ABI to improve diagnostic accuracy of ABI for cardiovascular risk assessment [22, 23].
Volume change in the lower limb generated by pulsatile artery inflow can be recorded by using plethysmography. Technological advances in pnuemoplethysmography using the cuff method have made it possible to obtain accurate pulse volume waveforms at the ankle in a short time during ABI measurement, and pulse volume recording parameters, including %MAP, are automatically calculated by an automated oscillometric device, which can lead to objective evaluation and clinical application of pulse volume recording parameters. The %MAP is the height of the mean area of the arterial waveform divided by the peak amplitude. In patients with hemodynamically occlusive lesions in the lower extremity artery, the pulse volume waveforms at the ankle tend to be blunted and, consequently, %MAP should be increased. Indeed, the proportion of patients with high %MAP increased with decreasing ABI in the present study. Although the results of a previous study showed that a combination of %MAP and ABI improves diagnostic accuracy for LEAD compared with ABI alone [10], there is little information on whether %MAP alone or in combination with ABI is useful for cardiovascular risk assessment as a marker of atherosclerosis. In the present study, the proportion of patients with clinical CAD was significantly higher in patients with %MAP ≥ 45% than in patients with %MAP < 45%. However, multivariate analysis revealed that there was no significant association between %MAP ≥ 45% and CAD after adjusting for several confounding factors, including ABI, whereas ABI was significantly associated with clinical CAD. These findings suggest that the cutoff value of 45% for %MAP recommended for the diagnosis of LEAD is not useful for cardiovascular risk assessment.
The optimal cutoff value of %MAP derived from the ROC curve to diagnose patients with clinical CAD was 40.3%. The proportion of patients with clinical CAD was significantly higher in patients with %MAP ≥ 40.3% than in patients with %MAP < 40.3% and %MAP ≥ 40.3% was significantly associated with CAD independent of ABI. Moreover, the addition of %MAP ≥ 40.3% to ABI < 1.00 improved the diagnostic accuracy for clinical CAD. These findings suggest that the cutoff value of 40.3%, but not 45% recommended for LEAD screening, for %MAP is useful for identifying patients with advanced atherosclerosis and cardiovascular risk assessment independent of ABI and that paying attention to whether %MAP is greater than 40.3% or not may reduce the risk of missing patients with advanced atherosclerosis. The optimal cutoff value of %MAP for clinical CAD may be lower than that for LEAD screening, which may be related to the insignificant association between %MAP ≥ 45% and clinical CAD.
The usefulness of %MAP as a prognostic marker has been investigated in some clinical studies [24,25,26]. Li et al. showed that high %MAP ( > 45%) was significantly associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality in subjects with normal ABI (0.9 < ABI ≤ 1.3) during a mean follow-up period of 20.3 months in an observational study in which almost 80% of the participants had diabetes mellitus [24]. The same investigators also reported that patients with a combination of high %MAP (>45%) and normal ABI (>0.9) had a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality than did patients with a combination of normal %MAP (≤45%) and normal ABI (>0.9) among patients with type 2 diabetes during a median follow-up period of 22.9 months [26]. Lee et al. reported that %MAP > 50% was significantly associated with higher all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality in patients who were receiving chronic hemodialysis during a mean follow-up period of 2.7 years [25]. These findings suggest that %MAP is useful for the assessment of mortality risk and cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and/or end-stage renal disease. The results of the present study support the findings of the previous studies, although the cutoff values of %MAP were different among the studies.
The device used for the measurements of ABI and %MAP in this study is now widely adopted in Asia, especially in parts of East Asia. Measurements with this device are operator-independent, noninvasive, and can be performed in a relatively short time. Considering the usefulness of ABI and %MAP for cardiovascular risk assessment, the measurement of ABI and %MAP should be performed more aggressively not only for LEAD screening but also for cardiovascular risk assessment in patients with cardiovascular risk factors in daily clinical practice.
There are several limitations in the present study. First, the possibility of the presence of residual unmeasured confounding factors cannot be excluded. Second, the results cannot be generalized to individuals with an ABI ≥ 1.4 since subjects with an ABI ≥ 1.4 were excluded from this study. Third, it remains unclear whether %MAP is a useful vascular marker for predicting future cardiovascular events because this study was a cross-sectional study. Fourth, although diagnosis of CAD was confirmed by CAG in all patients with clinical CAD, not all subjects without clinical CAD underwent CAG. Information on whether CAG was performed was not available and the exact number of subjects who underwent CAG among subjects without clinical CAD is unclear. Therefore, we cannot deny the possibility that patients without clinical CAD had latent coronary artery stenosis. Fifth, information on the exact date of CAG was not available. Therefore, the exact time interval between CAG and %MAP measurement was unclear. We cannot deny the possibility that %MAP did not reflect the condition of the lower extremity arteries at the time of diagnosis of CAD due to the time interval between CAG and %MAP measurement and that the time interval affected the association between %MAP and clinical CAD.
In conclusion, the cutoff value of 40.3%, but not 45% recommended for the diagnosis of LEAD, for %MAP may be useful for detecting patients with advanced atherosclerosis even when the ABI value is taken into account for cardiovascular risk assessment.
References
Selvin E, Erlinger TP. Prevalence of and risk factors for peripheral arterial disease in the United States: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2000. Circulation. 2004;110:738–43.
Newman AB, Shemanski L, Manolio TA, Cushman M, Mittelmark M, Polak JF, et al. Ankle-arm index as a predictor of cardiovascular disease and mortality in the cardiovascular health study. the cardiovascular health study group. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999;19:538–45.
Hirsch AT, Criqui MH, Treat-Jacobson D, Regensteiner JG, Creager MA, Olin JW, et al. Peripheral arterial disease detection, awareness, and treatment in primary care. JAMA. 2001;286:1317–24.
Newman AB, Siscovick DS, Manolio TA, Polak J, Fried LP, Borhani NO, et al. Ankle-arm index as a marker of atherosclerosis in the cardiovascular health study. Cardiovascular Heart Study (CHS) collaborative research group. Circulation. 1993;88:837–45.
Ankle Brachial Index C, Fowkes FG, Murray GD, Butcher I, Heald CL, Lee RJ, et al. Ankle brachial index combined with Framingham risk score to predict cardiovascular events and mortality: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2008;300:197–208.
Criqui MH, McClelland RL, McDermott MM, Allison MA, Blumenthal RS, Aboyans V, et al. The ankle-brachial index and incident cardiovascular events in the MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:1506–12.
Carter SA. Indirect systolic pressures and pulse waves in arterial occlusive diseases of the lower extremities. Circulation. 1968;37:624–37.
Kempczinski RF. Segmental volume plethysmography in the diagnosis of lower extremity arterial occlusive disease. J Cardiovasc Surg. 1982;23:125–9.
Allen J, Overbeck K, Nath AF, Murray A, Stansby G. A prospective comparison of bilateral photoplethysmography versus the ankle-brachial pressure index for detecting and quantifying lower limb peripheral arterial disease. J Vasc Surg. 2008;47:794–802.
Hashimoto T, Ichihashi S, Iwakoshi S, Kichikawa K. Combination of pulse volume recording (PVR) parameters and ankle-brachial index (ABI) improves diagnostic accuracy for peripheral arterial disease compared with ABI alone. Hypertens Res. 2016;39:430–4.
Yamashina, A Japanese Circulation Society. Guidelines for non-invasive vascular function test (JCS 2013) (in Japanese). JCS guidelines. http://www.j-circ.or.jp/guideline/pdf/JCS2013_yamas hina_h.pdf. Accessed 1 Apr 2014.
Azuma, N Japanese Circulation Society. Guideline on the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (JCS/JSVS 2022) (in Japanese). JCS guideliens. https://www.j-circ.or.jp/cms/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/JCS2022_Azuma.pdf.
Maruhashi T, Kajikawa M, Kishimoto S, Hashimoto H, Takaeko Y, Yamaji T, et al. Upstroke time is a useful vascular marker for detecting patients with coronary artery disease among subjects with normal ankle-brachial index. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9:e017139.
Maruhashi T, Kajikawa M, Kishimoto S, Takaeko Y, Yamaji T, Harada T, et al. Upstroke time as a marker of atherosclerosis in patients with diabetes mellitus who have a normal ankle-brachial index. J Diabetes Complicat. 2021;35:108044.
Umemura S, Arima H, Arima S, Asayama K, Dohi Y, Hirooka Y, et al. The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension (JSH 2019). Hypertens Res. 2019;42:1235–481.
American Diabetes Association: clinical practice recommendations 1999. Diabetes care. 1999;22:S1-114.
Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA. 2001;285:2486–97.
Gerhard-Herman MD, Gornik HL, Barrett C, Barshes NR, Corriere MA, Drachman DE, et al. 2016 AHA/ACC Guideline on the management of patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69:1465–508.
DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988;44:837–45.
Resnick HE, Lindsay RS, McDermott MM, Devereux RB, Jones KL, Fabsitz RR, et al. Relationship of high and low ankle brachial index to all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality: the Strong Heart Study. Circulation. 2004;109:733–9.
O’Hare AM, Katz R, Shlipak MG, Cushman M, Newman AB. Mortality and cardiovascular risk across the ankle-arm index spectrum: results from the Cardiovascular Health Study. Circulation. 2006;113:388–93.
Potier L, Halbron M, Bouilloud F, Dadon M, Le Doeuff J, Ha Van G, et al. Ankle-to-brachial ratio index underestimates the prevalence of peripheral occlusive disease in diabetic patients at high risk for arterial disease. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:e44.
Maruhashi T, Matsui S, Yusoff FM, Kishimoto S, Kajikawa M, Higashi Y. Falsely normalized ankle-brachial index despite the presence of lower-extremity peripheral artery disease: two case reports. J Med Case Rep. 2021;15:622.
Li YH, Lin SY, Sheu WH, Lee IT. Relationship between percentage of mean arterial pressure at the ankle and mortality in participants with normal ankle-brachial index: an observational study. BMJ open. 2016;6:e010540.
Lee WH, Hsu PC, Huang JC, Chen YC, Chen SC, Wu PY, et al. Association of pulse volume recording at ankle with total and cardiovascular mortality in hemodialysis patients. J Clin Med. 2019;8:2045.
Li YH, Sheu WH, Lee IT. Use of the ankle-brachial index combined with the percentage of mean arterial pressure at the ankle to improve prediction of all-cause mortality in type 2 diabetes mellitus: an observational study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020;19:173.
Acknowledgements
We thank Megumi Wakisaka, Miki Kumiji, Kiichiro Kawano and Satoko Michiyama for their excellent secretarial assistance.
Funding
This study was supported in part by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan (18590815 and 21590898 to YH) (16K19408 and 19K17565 to TM) and a Grant in Aid of Japanese Arteriosclerosis Prevention Fund (to YH).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Maruhashi, T., Kajikawa, M., Kishimoto, S. et al. Percentage of mean arterial pressure as a marker of atherosclerosis for detecting patients with coronary artery disease. Hypertens Res 47, 281–290 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-023-01442-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-023-01442-4
- Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Intriguing review and topics in this month of Hypertension Research
Hypertension Research (2024)
-
Upstroke time is a more useful marker of atherosclerosis than percentage of mean arterial pressure for detecting coronary artery disease in subjects with a normal ankle-brachial index
Hypertension Research (2024)