Abstract
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a chronic condition which mainly affects elderly males. Existing scientific evidences have not completely revealed the pathogenesis of BPH. Glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78) is a member of the heat shock protein 70 superfamily, which serves as an important regulator in many diseases. This study aims at elucidating the role of GRP78 in the BPH process. Human prostate tissues, cultured human prostate cell lines (BPH-1 and WPMY-1) and clinical data from BPH patients were utilized. The expression and localization of GRP78 were determined with quantitative real time PCR (qRT-PCR), Western blotting and immunofluorescence staining. GRP78 knockdown and overexpression cell models were created with GRP78 siRNA and GRP78 plasmid transfection. With these models, cell viability, apoptosis rate, as well as marker levels for epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and oxidative stress (OS) were detected by CCK8 assay, flow cytometry analysis and Western blotting respectively. AKT/mTOR and MAPK/ERK pathways were also evaluated. Results showed GRP78 was localized in the epithelium and stroma of the prostate, with higher expression in BPH tissues. There was no significant difference in GRP78 expression between BPH-1 and WPMY-1 cell lines. In addition, GRP78 knockdown (KD) slowed cell growth and induced apoptosis, without effects on the cell cycle stage of both cell lines. Lack of GRP78 affected expression levels of markers for EMT and OS. Consistently, overexpression of GRP78 completely reversed all effects of knocking down GRP78. We further found that GRP78 modulated cell growth and OS via AKT/mTOR signaling, rather than the MAPK/ERK pathway. Overall, our novel data demonstrates that GRP78 plays a significant role in the development of BPH and suggests that GRP78 might be rediscovered as a new target for treatment of BPH.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common chronic disease in elderly men [1]. Accumulating evidence shows that its incidence increases with age [2]. More than 80% of men over 70 years old are troubled by this disease worldwide [3]. A number of pathophysiological hypotheses of BPH have been proposed, including the imbalance of androgen-estrogen ratio; the dysregulation of cell proliferation and apoptosis; the interaction between stromal and epithelial cells; inflammation; as well as growth factors [4]. Also, oxidative stress (OS) has been found associated with BPH over the past decades. The prostate cells are often subjected to severe OS due to obesity [5], smoking and aging [6, 7]. In addition, attention has been focused on epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), a process implicated in embryonic development, organ fibrosis, cancer invasion and metastasis [8]. It is already well accepted that this process contributes to accumulation of stromal cells in the prostate [9]. However, the exact molecular mechanism of BPH has not been fully elucidated.
Glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78), also known as heat shock protein family A member 5, belongs to the HSP70 superfamily [10]. It mainly resides in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and functions as a molecular chaperone to start unfolded protein response (UPR) signaling during ER stress [11], which regulates intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis and insulin/IGF-1 signal transduction [12]. This molecule can also be found on the cell surface [13]. Under stressed conditions, GRP78 transduces to the cell membrane from the cytoplasm, leading to its abundant expression on the membrane [14]. A number of studies provide evidence for the vital role GRP78 plays in cell proliferation and apoptosis in a wide range of cells and tissues [15,16,17,18,19]. GRP78 is able to act as the target of steroids to modulate cell proliferation in hormone-sensitive tissues [19]. It is also essential for embryonic development and senility [12]. Actually, high level expression of GRP78 was observed at the blastocyst stage of mouse embryo [20]. Meanwhile, it was shown that GRP78 is highly expressed in the follicle, oviduct, embryo and placenta [21]. In addition to cell growth and embryonic development, the EMT has been implicated in the dysregulation of GRP78 [22], where it functions as a key regulator modulating several cell adhesion markers, including E-cadherin, N-cadherin, and Snail2 (Slug) [23, 24]. Also, GRP78 has been correlated with OS. In chronic kidney disease, GRP78 was overexpressed to counteract OS damage and produce an important protective effect [25]. In vascular endothelial cells, copper oxide nanoparticles (CuONPs)-induced OS leads to upregulation of GRP78 [26].
A link between GRP78 and BPH has not been reported in the literature. As mentioned above, BPH mainly results from the imbalance of cell proliferation and cell apoptosis with the proliferation being dominant. The occurrence of EMT, along with accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), also have been demonstrated to contribute to BPH development [9, 27]. Recently, it was hypothesized that BPH implicated “reawakening” of the embryonic process where the prostate mesenchyme induced epithelial differentiation [28]. Based on all of the above findings, we speculated that GRP78 is associated with BPH. Indeed, our current study has revealed an upregulated expression of GRP78 in BPH tissues compared with normal ones. We further examined cell viability, cell apoptosis, as well as the status of EMT and OS after knockdown and overexpression of GRP78 in human prostate cell lines in order to investigate the effect of GRP78 on BPH development. Finally, we tried to identify the underlying molecular mechanism(s) through which GRP78 modulates proliferation, apoptosis and OS in BPH.
Results
The expression and localization of GRP78 in human BPH tissues and prostate cells
As shown in Fig. 1, GRP78 mRNA and protein levels were substantially upregulated in BPH tissues (Fig. 1A–C). There was no difference of GRP78 expression between BPH-1 and WPMY-1 cell lines (Fig. 1D–F). The fluorescence intensity of BPH samples was significantly higher than that of normal samples (Fig. 1G). In addition, GRP78 was localized in both epithelial and stromal compartments of prostate tissues (Fig. 1G), and more specifically, it was stained at the membrane or the cytoplasm, rather than the nucleus, of BPH-1 and WPMY-1 cell lines (Fig. 1H). The proportion of GRP78-stained cells also showed no difference between two lines in the immunofluorescence staining experiment (Fig. 1I).
Knockdown of GRP78 attenuates cell viability and induces apoptosis in human prostate cells
GRP78-silenced cell models were established through GRP78 siRNA (siGRP78) transfection. The knockdown efficiency of si-1, si-2 and si-3 was assessed by qPCR, Western blotting and flow cytometry analysis. si-2 was shown to more strongly decrease GRP78 mRNA and protein levels in BPH-1 and WPMY-1 cells, compared with si-1 and si-3 (Fig. S1A–C). Moreover, si-2-mediated GRP78 knockdown induced apoptosis more effectively in prostate cell lines than the other two siRNAs (Fig. S1D, E). Therefore, si-2 was ultimately selected for our following experiments.
The effect of GRP78 silencing with si-2 (siGRP78–1) on cell proliferation, cell cycle and cell apoptosis was subsequently determined by CCK8 assay and flow cytometry analysis. GRP78 KD strongly inhibited cell viability at 48 h and 72 h in both BPH-1 and WPMY-1 cells (Fig. 2A). However, no statistically significant difference was observed in cell cycle detection (Fig. 2B, C). GRP78 silencing also greatly increased the apoptosis rate of two prostate cell lines by ~ 3.2 fold and 3.4 fold, respectively (Fig. 2D, E). In agreement with previous studies, BAX (a pro-apoptotic protein) was shown to downregulate while Bcl2 (an anti-apoptotic protein) was upregulated in BPH tissues (Fig. S2A, B). Consistently, BAX tended to increase while Bcl-2 was decreased in GRP78-silenced prostate cells (Fig. 2F, G).
Overexpression of GRP78 promotes cell growth and inhibits apoptosis in human prostate cells
We transfected GRP78 plasmid into BPH-1 and WPMY-1 cell lines. As shown in Fig. 3A–C, the plasmid substantially increased GRP78 transcript and translation levels in prostate cells. The viability of GRP78-overexpressed cells was significantly higher at 24, 48 and 72 h (Fig. 3D). In agreement with the results of gene KD, there was no difference for cell cycle stages between cells treated with vector and GRP78 plasmid (Fig. 3E, F). Furthermore, GRP78 overexpression significantly inhibited apoptosis of BPH-1 and WPMY-1 cells, as demonstrated by dramatically decreased apoptosis rates in Fig. 3G, H. Also, the protein expression of BAX was significantly repressed and Bcl-2 levels were enhanced (Fig. 3I, J).
GRP78 participates in activation of AKT-mTOR signal transduction pathway
The signaling pathways correlating with GRP78-related cell growth and death were investigated in this section. The protein expression levels of four AKT-mTOR signaling biomarkers, p-AKT, t-AKT, p-mTOR and t-mTOR, were detected in GRP78-silenced and GRP78-overexpressed cells. Figure 4A, B show a significant downregulation in protein expression of these biomarkers in GRP78 KD cells (BPH-1 and WPMY-1). Meanwhile, the ratio of p-AKT/t-AKT and p-mTOR/t-mTOR also decreased (Fig. 4A, B). In contrast, GRP78 overexpression dramatically elevated levels of four AKT/mTOR signaling markers, as well as the ratio of p-AKT/t-AKT and p-mTOR/t-mTOR (Fig. 4C, D). However, GRP78 silencing did not significantly change protein levels of several MAPK signal pathway biomarkers, including ERK1/2, p38 and JNK (Fig. S3A–D).
SC79 reverses the effect of GRP78 knockdown on prostate cells
To further validate whether siGRP78-mediated apoptosis implicated AKT-mTOR signal pathway, AKT activator SC79 was used to treat BPH-1 and WPMY-1 cells transfected with/without GRP78 siRNA. As expected, SC79 completely reversed attenuated cell viability caused by GRP78 silencing (Fig. 5A). siGRP78-induced apoptosis was rescued by SC79 (Fig. 5B, C). Furthermore, this activator recovered the expression of apoptosis-related proteins and AKT/mTOR markers changed by GRP78 knockdown in BPH-1 and WPMY-1 lines (Fig. 5D–G).
GRP78 modulates the EMT process in BPH-1 cells
To investigate whether GRP78 participated in the EMT process, we determined the expression of EMT markers (E-cad, N-cad and vimentin) as well as EMT transcript factors (EMT-TFs) (Snail1, Snail2, Twist, ZEB1 and ZEB2) in BPH-1 cells. As shown in Fig. 6A–C, GRP78 knockdown dramatically downregulated E-cad, N-cad and vimentin, while GRP78 overexpression significantly increased expression of these markers. GRP78-silenced cells displayed a substantial reduction of Snail1, Twist, ZEB1 and ZEB2, as well as an upregulation of Snail2 at both mRNA and protein levels, while GRP78 overexpression reversed all these changes (Fig. 6D–F).
GRP78 regulates oxidative stress via AKT activation in prostate cells
We further measured ROS production and expression of two antioxidant enzymes: superoxide dismutase-2 (SOD2) and catalase (CAT) in BPH-1 and WPMY-1 cells. As shown in Fig. 7A, B and Table S1, GRP78 KD resulted in excessive levels of ROS. In contrast, ROS levels were significantly lower in GRP78-overexpressed prostate cells. Knockdown of GRP78 dramatically decreased mRNA and protein levels of SOD2 and CAT, while overexpression of GRP78 significantly upregulated these two genes (Fig. 7C–E). Additionally, we investigated whether AKT participated in these changes related to GRP78. As expected, AKT activator SC79 rescued ROS increase caused by GRP78 silencing (Fig. 7F, G and Table S2). The mRNA and protein expression of SOD2 and CAT downregulated by GRP78 knockdown were also recovered by SC79 (Fig. 7H–J).
The modulation of cell growth, cell apoptosis, as well as EMT and OS status by GRP78 is further validated by another siRNA (siGRP78–2) and another cell line RWPE-1
We used another siRNA (siGRP78–2) and another cell line (RWPE-1) to repeat our phenotype observations to make our study more convincing. As expected, cell viability was repressed by siGRP78–2 in BPH-1, WPMY-1 and RWPE-1 cells (Fig. 8A). A dramatic increase in the proportion of apoptotic cells following GRP78 KD by siGRP78–2 was observed in these three cell lines (Fig. 8B, C). Silencing GRP78 with both siGRP78–1 and siGRP78–2 was shown to increase ROS levels, and downregulate SOD2 and CAT expression in three lines (Fig. 8D, E). In agreement with above-mentioned results, both GRP78-silenced prostatic epithelial cells (BPH-1 and RWPE-1) displayed a downregulation of E-cad, N-cad and vimentin, concomitant with an upregulation of Snail2 expression (Fig. 8F, G).
GRP78 correlates with the severity of nocturia and expression of multiple markers for apoptosis, EMT and OS
Finally, we investigated the correlation between GRP78 and multiple clinical characteristics, as well as several markers of apoptosis, EMT and OS (BAX, Bcl2, E-cad, N-cad, SOD2 and CAT), by Pearson correlation analysis. The severity of nocturia in BPH significantly correlated with GRP78 levels (Table S3, p < 0.01), but no significant correlation was observed between other clinical characteristics and GRP78 expression. In addition, we found that GRP78 was negatively correlated with BAX and positively correlated with another apoptosis marker (Bcl2), EMT markers (E-cad, N-cad) and OS markers (SOD2, CAT) (Table S4).
Discussion
This study showed that GRP78 is upregulated in BPH tissues and almost equally localized in both the stroma and epithelium of the prostate. We demonstrated GRP78 modulates the proliferation and apoptosis of prostate cells via AKT/mTOR signaling in vitro. We also found that GRP78 plays a key role in EMT and OS, and that AKT participates in this GRP78-regulated OS process. In general, our novel data suggests that GRP78 is closely related to BPH.
GRP78, a member of HSP70 superfamily, is an important molecular chaperone in the ER [10, 11]. An analysis of the human tissue-specific expression by genome-wide integration of transcriptomics showed that GRP78 is broadly expressed in human thyroid (rpkm 442.6), bone marrow (rpkm 284.6) and 24 other tissues, including the prostate (rpkm 169.4) [29]. This molecule was also reported to upregulate in multiple malignancies, including lung cancer, prostate cancer and glioblastoma [10, 14, 30]. In addition to cancer, GRP78 participates in embryonic development and senility [12]. Nevertheless, its function in BPH has not been completely identified. Actually, BPH is regarded as “reawakening” of the embryonic process with aging being one of the main pathogenic factors [28]. We therefore speculated that GRP78 likely drove the development and progression of BPH. Indeed, we observed an upregulation of GRP78 in both epithelial and stromal compartments of hyperplastic prostate tissues. The GRP78 molecule was shown to be almost equally localized on the membrane or in the cytoplasm of human prostate cell lines, with relatively higher expression on the cell surface.
GRP78 was found as a key regulator of cell survival, proliferation and apoptosis in a wide range of tissues [12, 15, 21, 31]. Excessive levels of GRP78 augmented cartilage cell proliferation during the chondrogenesis process [32]. Knockdown of GRP78 slowed the cell growth rate and induced cell apoptosis in glioma [33]. Similarly, our current study revealed that the viability of BPH-1 and WPMY-1 cells is attenuated when GRP78 silenced. Meanwhile, siGRP78 caused a dramatically increased apoptosis rate as well. It is interesting to observe that the apoptosis rate of GRP78-silenced WPMY-1 cells was 25.60%, nearly two times higher than that of BPH-1 cells, which was probably attributed to the difference of cell viability after incubation with siRNA and transfection reagents. Besides cells in the GRP78 KD group, the apoptosis rate of WPMY-1 cells in the control group (transfected with scrambled siRNA and transfection reagents) was 7.46%, which was also approximately twice as much as that of BPH-1 cells (3.32%). These observations indicate that WPMY-1 is more sensitive to siRNA (control siRNA or GRP78 siRNA) and/or transfection reagents than BPH-1 cells. On the other hand, both cell lines showed similar growth multiples in apoptosis rate (~3.2 fold in BPH-1 and ~3.4 fold in WPMY-1), indicating that the effect of GRP78 KD on both lines is almost same, when taking into account the similar basal expression of GRP78 in BPH-1 and WPMY-1. Also, the CCK8 assay revealed a relatively poorer viability of WPMY-1 cells at the time point 72 h, compared with that of BPH-1 cells, following GRP78 KD. Thus, we speculated that it was the difference of cell sensitivity to siRNA and/or transfection reagents, rather than a different amount of GRP78 in two cell lines, that accounted for the different impact on the overall level of cell apoptosis. Additionally, apoptosis-related proteins, BAX (a pro-apoptotic molecule) and Bcl2 (an anti-apoptotic molecule), were significantly changed, both of which strictly regulates the intrinsic apoptotic pathway [34]. However, no significant differences in terms of cell cycles were observed in either BPH-1 or WPMY-1 cells. We inferred from these findings that the suppression of cell viability induced by GRP78 knockdown might not correlate with cell cycle arrest.
The current study also revealed that GRP78 knockdown results in the repression of the EMT process with decreased expression of epithelial phenotype marker E-cad, and mesenchymal phenotype markers (N-cad and vimentin). This was unexpected because EMT inhibition is normally compatible with upregulation of the epithelial marker, along with downregulation of mesenchymal markers [35, 36]. To investigate the exact mechanism by which E-cad decreased, we determined the expression of multiple EMT-TFs, including Snail1, Snail2, Twist, ZEB1 and ZEB2, and found that siGRP78 dramatically upregulated Snail2 while repressing the expression of other EMT-TFs. In fact, GRP78 KD has been shown to induce Snail2 expression and Snail2 was reported as a strong suppressor of E-cad in the prostate [23]. Therefore, the abnormal changes of E-cad expression is probably due to the upregulation of Snail2.
We also investigated the OS status in GRP78-silenced prostate cells. SOD2 and CAT, two critical antioxidant enzymes, are shown to be involved in the defense mechanism against OS and they are usually used to gage the antioxidant activity directly and the OS degree indirectly [37]. It is generally known that OS can not only activate the transcription factor NF-κB that targets at inflammation, cell proliferation, cell migration, and apoptosis, but also lead to DNA damage via vascular tissue damage, protein structure and function damage, genomic damage, through both of which compensatory cellular proliferation is induced and BPH ultimately occurs [27]. In contrast, our study reveals that OS is significantly inhibited by overexpression of GRP78 while it is activated with GRP78 knockdown. These findings seemed unexpected as both GRP78 and OS are stimuli for BPH. However, Bi et al. revealed that GRP78 is capable of inhibiting ROS accumulation by an activation of AKT (protein kinase B, PKB) [38]. GRP78 was also shown to prevent OS via regulation of Ca2+ homeostasis by Liu’s group [39]. Interestingly, our study shows a dramatic decrease of AKT in GRP78-silenced prostate cells. Therefore, it was speculated that GRP78 itself was possibly an inhibitor for ROS generation and OS activation by regulating Ca2+ levels. It was also likely that AKT repression participated in excessive ROS production induced by GRP78 silencing. We also validated all aforementioned phenotype observations with another siRNA (siGRP78–2) and another cell lines (RWPE-1). Thus, the chance off-target effects was minimized. Notably, these phenotypic changes produced by GRP78 knockdown were completely reversed by GRP78 overexpression.
We further investigated the underlying mechanism through which GRP78 regulates the proliferation, apoptosis and OS in prostate cells. Existing evidence suggests that several signaling pathways, including AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) (AKT/mTOR) signaling and mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK)/extracellular regulated protein kinases (ERK) (MAPK/ERK) pathway, are involved in the regulation of cell apoptosis [40, 41]. The MAPK signaling cascade includes three kinases: MAPK kinase kinase (MAPKKK), MAPK kinase (MAPKK) and MAPK, all of which transmit signals by phosphorylating downstream molecules [42]. Four different MAPK cascades have been reported to exist in cells, including ERK1/2, c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), p38 MAPK and ERK5 [43], with MAPK/ERK cascades playing more important roles in regulating cell proliferation and cell apoptosis [42]. AKT/mTOR signaling is also a significant apoptosis-related signal transduction pathway which mainly affects cell survival, proliferation, apoptosis, cell cycle and actin remodeling [44]. Briefly, the activation of AKT upstream protein, phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K), leads to the successive phosphorylation of multiple downstream molecules, from AKT ultimately to mTOR (mTORC1 and mTORC2) [44]. The phosphorylation of mTOR could trigger a series of the above-mentioned biological processes [44]. The apoptosis of osteoarthritic chondrocytes, human hepatocytes and keratinocytes has been reported to implicate these two pathways [45,46,47]. Meanwhile, Ni et al. found that GRP78 is capable of forming complexes with other protein partners to activate AKT/mTOR signaling [48]. In our current study, we showed that lack of GRP78 strongly represses the AKT/mTOR pathway while GRP78 overexpression activated this signaling. However, there were no statistically significant changes in protein expression of MAPK/ERK signaling markers in GRP78-silenced BPH-1 or WPMY-1 cells. We then combined SC79, an AKT activator which augments AKT phosphorylation through binding to PH domain of AKT, with siGRP78 to treat cultured human prostate cell lines. We showed the viability and apoptosis level of BPH-1 and WPMY-1 cells that were altered by siGRP78 were completely reversed to control levels. In agreement with our finding, Liu et al. showed the GRP78 blockade with a specific antibody (MAAb159) decreased PI3K instead of MAPK targets, indicating that GRP78 was the upstream regulator of AKT/mTOR signaling [49, 50]. We therefore speculated that it was the AKT/mTOR pathway, rather than MAPK/ERK pathway, that probably participated in regulating the cell growth related to GRP78. In addition to cell growth, AKT/mTOR signaling is also involved in GRP78-modulated OS status changes. SC79 could recover the excessive ROS production and decrease of SOD2 and CAT expression caused by GRP78 knockdown. This was compatible with the previous study mentioned above [38]. Thus, AKT indeed participates in OS status changes related to GRP78. This could also explain why GRP78 knockdown increased ROS levels and downregulated SOD2 and CAT though both GRP78 and OS are stimuli for BPH. Interestingly, all these phenotypes (cell viability, apoptosis and OS status) of control cell lines were not significantly affected by SC79 alone, and the phosphorylation of AKT was promoted insignificantly. This condition was consistent with a previous publication by Xu et al. [51], who also found an insignificant enhancement of the phosphorylation of AKT by SC79. We inferred that it was probably due to the fact that AKT phosphorylation had reached its maximum in our culture conditions since SC79 did not affect ROS production and expression of SOD2 and CAT in control lines. Only when the phosphorylation of AKT was repressed (silencing GRP78 in this study) would we observe a significant increase of p-AKT expression induced by SC79.
Finally, our current study shows that the severity of nocturia correlated with GRP78 expression levels in BPH patients, whereas there was no significant correlation between other clinical characteristics and GRP78 expression. In addition, GRP78 was shown to be negatively correlated with BAX and positively correlate with another apoptosis marker (Bcl2), EMT markers (E-cad, N-cad) as well as OS markers (SOD2, CAT) in BPH tissues, indicating a significantly positive correlation between GRP78 and OS status, EMT status, as well as apoptosis. These results were compatible with all of the above findings. The correlation between GRP78 and clinical traits, as well as these important biological processes, are worthy of further study.
In conclusion, we reveal and substantiate a correlation between GRP78 and BPH in this study. GRP78 was shown to have higher expression in the hyperplastic prostate and its upregulation mediates the proliferation and apoptosis of prostate cells via the AKT/mTOR signal pathway. Meanwhile, GRP78 plays a key role in EMT and OS, and it regulates OS status via AKT activation in BPH. In aggregate, our novel data provides evidence that GRP78 is probably a key regulator of BPH and it could likely be considered as a new therapeutic target for BPH.
Materials and methods
Human tissues and clinical data
Normal prostate samples were obtained from six brain-dead men (mean age: 29.6 ± 4.8 years old), with pathological examination by two different pathologists revealing no hyperplasia. A total of 104 BPH specimens (mean age, 70.1 ± 2.5 years old) with clinical data were obtained from the patients who underwent transurethral resection prostate in the department of urology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University. Post-operative pathological examination revealed BPH. Prostate tissues were divided into two strips and were, respectively, stored in liquid nitrogen for qPCR and Western blotting, and stored in 10% neutral buffered formalin for immunofluorescence microscopy and tissue microarray (TMA) construction. All prostate samples were collected with written informed consent from Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University and the collection was approved by the Hospital Medical Ethics Committees. Our human studies were conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Cell culture
Human BPH epithelial cell line (BPH-1) (Cat. #BNCC339850) was purchased from Procell Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China, and was cultured in RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco, China) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, GIBCO, Australia). SV40 large T antigen immortalized stromal cell line (WPMY-1) (Cat. #GNHu36) was acquired from Stem Cell Bank, Chinese Academy of Sciences in Shanghai, China, and it was cultured in DMEM medium (Gibco, China) with 5% FBS. Human normal prostatic epithelial cell line (RWPE-1) (Cat. #CRL-11609) was obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). The cells were cultured in prostate epithelial cell medium (PEpiCM, ScienCell Research Laboratories) with 1% prostate epithelial cell growth supplement (PEpiCGS, ScienCell Research Laboratories) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin solution (P/S, ScienCell Research Laboratories). Identification of three cell lines was performed at the China Center for Type Culture Collection in Wuhan, China. All the cell lines were cultured at 37 °C, 5% CO2 conditions in the cell incubator.
Cell transfection
The GRP78-target specific small interfering RNA (GRP78 siRNA, siGRP78) was purchased from Genepharma Ltd., Suzhou, China. Three different siRNAs (Sequences are listed in Table S5) were tested for highest GRP78 knockdown efficiency. As a control, negative control siRNA (Control) was used. GRP78 siRNAs (or control siRNA) were diluted in Opti-MEM reduced serum medium and mixed with Lipofectamine®2000 (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The complexes were added to 6-well plates where cells were seeded in and cultured for at least 24 h. For GRP78 overexpression, GRP78 cDNA was synthesized and transduced into a plasmid by Fenghuishengwu Co., Ltd. in Changsha, China. Empty plasmid (vector) was used as control. After transfection by plasmid for 48 h, alterations of GRP78 at transcriptional and protein levels were evaluated by qRT-PCR and Western blotting.
AKT activator treatment for rescue experiments
After siRNA transfection, BPH-1 and WPMY-1 cells were treated with AKT activator SC79 (MedChemExpress, China) at 4 ug/ml to activate AKT [52]. Cells in the untreated group were incubated with a corresponding amount of 0.1% DMSO. Both groups were subjected to RNA interference and then cell viability and apoptosis rate were measured by a cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) assay and flow cytometry analysis/Western blotting, respectively.
Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK8) assay
Cell viability was examined by CCK-8 (MedChemExpress, China) assay in our study. Briefly, the neurons (approximately 5000 cells/well) were seeded in 96-well plate and subjected to various treatments described above. BPH-1 and WPMY-1 cells were then cultured in the cell incubator for 0, 24, 48 or 72 h, respectively. At different time points, 10 μl CCK-8 solution (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China) was added to each well, and cells were incubated in the dark for 1 h. The absorbance at 450 nm was measured by a microplate reader (Thermo Labsystems, Vantaa, Finland).
Flow cytometry analysis
After transfection with siRNA or GRP78 plasmid, BPH-1 and WPMY-1 cells were harvested for flow cytometry analysis. The cell cycle stage was detected using the cell cycle staining kit (Multisciences Biotech, CO., Ltd. China) by flow cytometry (Beckman, Cat. #FC500). After phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) washing and centrifugation, the prostate cells were resuspended with 1 ml DNA staining solution and 10 μl permeabilization solution and then incubated in the dark at 37 °C for 30 min. For cell apoptosis detection, cells were resuspended with 1 ml pf binding buffer and stained with 5 μl Annexin V- FITC, as well as 10 μl propidium iodide (PI) (Multisciences Biotech Co., Ltd. China) for 5 min according to manufacturer’s instructions. To determine the level of ROS generation, cells were incubated with DCFH-DA at a 1:100 dilution in the dark for 30 min, followed by immediate detection of ROS levels by flow cytometry.
Total RNA extraction, reverse transcription and quantitative real time PCR (qRT-PCR)
Total RNA was isolated from collected tissues and cells with RaPure Total RNA Micro Kit (Magen, China) and Trizol reagent (Invitrog, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufactures’ protocol. The RNA was quantified at 260 nm / 280 nm using the NanoPhotometer spectrophotometer (IMPLEN, Westlake Village, CA, USA). For reverse transcription, 2 μg of total RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA with ABScript II RT Master Mix (ABclonal, Wuhan, China) following manufacturer’s instructions. qRT-PCR was performed to determine the mRNA level of a gene of interest based on SYBR green in a Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA, USA) CFX96 system. The primer sequences are listed in Table S6. The relative mRNA expression levels of target genes to loading control GAPDH were calculated with 2−ΔΔCT method.
Western blotting analysis
Tissues and harvested cells were lysed and ultrasonicated in RIPA reagent containing protease inhibitor and phosphatase inhibitor (Sigma-Aldrich) on ice for 30 min. The supernatant was collected after centrifugation at 14,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. The protein concentration was measured by bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay. Protein extracts were resolved on 10% sodium dodecylsulfate-polyacrylamide (SDS-PAGE) gels (Wuhan Boster Biological Technology Ltd., Wuhan, China) prior to being transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). After blocking in 5% skim milk for 2 h, the membrane was incubated in primary antibody (Table S7) overnight at 4 °C and then incubated with secondary antibody: goat anti-rabbit IgG or goat anti-mouse IgG (Table S8) for 2 h at room temperature. Our bands were visualized with enhanced chemiluminescence kit (Thermo Scientific Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) on a Tanon-5200 ECL imager (Tanon, Shanghai, China). The protein levels were quantified using Image J software. Target protein bands were normalized to the loading control GAPDH.
Cell immunofluorescence staining
The prostate cells were grown on 12 mm coverslips in a 6-well plate and then washed with ice cold PBS. The coverslips were next fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde solution (PFA) for 30 min, followed by 0.1% Triton X-100 incubation at room temperature for 5 min and 10% BSA blocking at 37 °C for 1 h. Then, cells were successively incubated with primary antibody (Table S7) at 4 °C overnight, washed with PBS, and incubated with Cy3 labeled or FITC labeled secondary antibody (Table S8) in humidified air at 37 °C for 1 h. The nuclei were labeled blue with 2 μg/ml 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Visualization was performed with a Laser Scanning Confocal fluorescence microscope (cat. no. IX73; Olympus, Japan).
Tissue immunofluorescence staining
Tissues were fixed with 4% PFA overnight at 4°C and embedded into paraffin (Paraplast, Sigma-Aldrich) using a special tissue processor (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat. #STP120). Paraffin sections (4 μm) were sliced using a rotary microtome (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat. #HM325). The slides were washed in PBS and incubated for 2 h in the mixture of PBS supplemented with 0.2% Triton X-100 and 0.1% bovine serum albumin, followed by incubation in humidified air with GRP78 primary antibody (Table S7) and Cy3-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Table S8) in turn. DAPI was used to stain the nucleus. A confocal fluorescence microscope was used to visualize each slide.
TMA construction
The TMA was constructed based on the methods our group previously reported [53]. Briefly, the paraffin‐embedded tissues were sliced prior to H&E staining. Representative areas of the H&E staining sections were evaluated and confirmed by a senior pathologist. A TMA marker was designed by using 1.5 mm tissue core in each case. Finally, TMA containing 16 × 10 tissue cores for all BPH specimens in each were obtained and then sliced continuously into 4‐μm‐thick sections.
Immunohistochemistry and clinical correlation analysis
The paraffin sections were deparaffinized in xylene prior to anhydrous ethanol, 95% alcohol and 75% alcohol in turn. They were subsequently kept in 10 mM boiled sodium citrate buffer (pH 6.0) for 2 min for antigen retrieval and incubated with 3% H2O2 solution for 10 min to inactivate endogenous peroxidase. To block non-specific binding, 15% normal goat serum was used to incubate sections for 15 min at room temperature. Next, the sections were incubated successively with GRP78 primary antibody (Table S7) at humidified and 4 °C conditions and with secondary antibody (Table S8) at 37 °C until peroxidase and 3, 3′-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride visualization. Negative controls were incubated with PBS instead of the antibody. All stained sections were imaged using an Olympus-DP72 light microscope (Olympus, Japan). GRP78 expression in the prostate tissues from our TMA was blindly quantified by two pathologists via analysis for positive area of all images with Image J. For further correlation analysis, the clinical data were collected as we mentioned above. Pearson correlation analysis was conducted to investigate the correlation between GRP78 and several clinical characteristics of BPH, as well as GRP78 and multiple markers for apoptosis, EMT and OS.
Statistical analysis
In this study, all data were expressed in the form of mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analysis was performed by Student’s t-test or one-way ANOVA with SPSS v25.0. p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
Data availability
The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Bianchi-Frias D, Vakar-Lopez F, Coleman IM, Plymate SR, Reed MJ, Nelson PS. The effects of aging on the molecular and cellular composition of the prostate microenvironment. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e12501.
Robert G, De La Taille A, Descazeaud A. [Epidemiology of benign prostatic hyperplasia]. Prog Urol. 2018;28:803–12.
Egan KB. The epidemiology of benign prostatic hyperplasia associated with lower urinary tract symptoms: prevalence and incident rates. Urol Clin North Am. 2016;43:289–97.
McConnell JD. Medical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia with androgen suppression. Prostate Suppl. 1990;3:49–59.
Tyagi P, Motley SS, Koyama T, Kashyap M, Gingrich J, Yoshimura N, et al. Molecular correlates in urine for the obesity and prostatic inflammation of BPH/LUTS patients. Prostate 2018;78:17–24.
Ho T, Howard LE, Vidal AC, Gerber L, Moreira D, McKeever M, et al. Smoking and risk of low- and high-grade prostate cancer: results from the REDUCE study. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:5331–8.
Xu H, Fu S, Chen Y, Chen Q, Gu M, Wang Z. Smoking habits and benign prostatic hyperplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Medicine. 2016;95:e4565.
Thiery JP, Acloque H, Huang RY, Nieto MA. Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in development and disease. Cell 2009;139:871–90.
Alonso-Magdalena P, Brossner C, Reiner A, Cheng G, Sugiyama N, Warner M, et al. A role for epithelial-mesenchymal transition in the etiology of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:2859–63.
Kang BR, Yang SH, Chung BR, Kim W, Kim Y. Cell surface GRP78 as a biomarker and target for suppressing glioma cells. Sci Rep. 2016;6:34922.
Vilchez D, Saez I, Dillin A. The role of protein clearance mechanisms in organismal ageing and age-related diseases. Nat Commun. 2014;5:5659.
Pfaffenbach KT, Lee AS. The critical role of GRP78 in physiologic and pathologic stress. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2011;23:150–6.
Zhang LH, Zhang X. Roles of GRP78 in physiology and cancer. J Cell Biochem. 2010;110:1299–305.
Farshbaf M, Khosroushahi AY, Mojarad-Jabali S, Zarebkohan A, Valizadeh H, Walker PR. Cell surface GRP78: an emerging imaging marker and therapeutic target for cancer. J Control Release. 2020;328:932–41.
Zhu G, Lee AS. Role of the unfolded protein response, GRP78 and GRP94 in organ homeostasis. J Cell Physiol. 2015;230:1413–20.
Xiong G, Chen H, Wan Q, Dai J, Sun Y, Wang J, et al. Emodin promotes fibroblast apoptosis and prevents epidural fibrosis through PERK pathway in rats. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019;14:319.
Xiong Z, Jiang R, Li X, Liu Y, Guo F. Different roles of GRP78 on cell proliferation and apoptosis in cartilage development. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16:21153–76.
Ayaub EA, Kolb PS, Mohammed-Ali Z, Tat V, Murphy J, Bellaye PS, et al. GRP78 and CHOP modulate macrophage apoptosis and the development of bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis. J Pathol. 2016;239:411–25.
Hebert-Schuster M, Rotta BE, Kirkpatrick B, Guibourdenche J, Cohen M. The interplay between glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78) and steroids in the reproductive system. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19:1842.
Kim SK, Kim YK, Lee AS. Expression of the glucose-regulated proteins (GRP94 and GRP78) in differentiated and undifferentiated mouse embryonic cells and the use of the GRP78 promoter as an expression system in embryonic cells. Differentiation 1990;42:153–9.
Zhang C. Roles of Grp78 in female mammalian reproduction. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol. 2017;222:129–55.
Zhang L, Li Z, Fan Y, Li H, Li Z, Li Y. Overexpressed GRP78 affects EMT and cell-matrix adhesion via autocrine TGF-beta/Smad2/3 signaling. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2015;64:202–11.
Cultrara CN, Kozuch SD, Ramasundaram P, Heller CJ, Shah S, Beck AE, et al. GRP78 modulates cell adhesion markers in prostate Cancer and multiple myeloma cell lines. BMC Cancer. 2018;18:1263.
Zhang XX, Li HD, Zhao S, Zhao L, Song HJ, Wang G, et al. The cell surface GRP78 facilitates the invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:917296.
Bhreathnach U, Griffin B, Brennan E, Ewart L, Higgins D, Murphy M. Profibrotic IHG-1 complexes with renal disease associated HSPA5 and TRAP1 in mitochondria. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2017;1863:896–906.
He H, Xiao S, Xu G, Wang B, Zou Z, Qin X, et al. The NADPH oxidase 4 protects vascular endothelial cells from copper oxide nanoparticles-induced oxidative stress and cell death. Life Sci. 2020;252:117571.
Minciullo PL, Inferrera A, Navarra M, Calapai G, Magno C, Gangemi S. Oxidative stress in benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review. Urol Int. 2015;94:249–54.
Brennen WN, Isaacs JT. Mesenchymal stem cells and the embryonic reawakening theory of BPH. Nat Rev Urol. 2018;15:703–15.
Fagerberg L, Hallstrom BM, Oksvold P, Kampf C, Djureinovic D, Odeberg J, et al. Analysis of the human tissue-specific expression by genome-wide integration of transcriptomics and antibody-based proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2014;13:397–406.
Luo B, Lee AS. The critical roles of endoplasmic reticulum chaperones and unfolded protein response in tumorigenesis and anticancer therapies. Oncogene 2013;32:805–18.
Kurowska P, Mlyczynska E, Dupont J, Rak A. Novel insights on the corpus luteum function: role of vaspin on porcine luteal cell angiogenesis, proliferation and apoptosis by activation of GRP78 receptor and MAP3/1 kinase pathways. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:6823.
Xiong Z, Jiang R, Li X, Liu Y, Guo F. Different roles of GRP78 on cell proliferation and apoptosis in cartilage development. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16:21153–76.
Pyrko P, Schonthal AH, Hofman FM, Chen TC, Lee AS. The unfolded protein response regulator GRP78/BiP as a novel target for increasing chemosensitivity in malignant gliomas. Cancer Res. 2007;67:9809–16.
Hu G, Zhang J, Xu F, Deng H, Zhang W, Kang S, et al. Stomatin-like protein 2 inhibits cisplatin-induced apoptosis through MEK/ERK signaling and the mitochondrial apoptosis pathway in cervical cancer cells. Cancer Sci. 2018;109:1357–68.
Busch EL, Keku TO, Richardson DB, Cohen SM, Eberhard DA, Avery CL, et al. Evaluating markers of epithelial-mesenchymal transition to identify cancer patients at risk for metastatic disease. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2016;33:53–62.
Heerboth S, Housman G, Leary M, Longacre M, Byler S, Lapinska K, et al. EMT and tumor metastasis. Clin Transl Med. 2015;4:6.
Tanaka H, Mizuno M, Katsumata Y, Ishikawa K, Kondo H, Hashizume H, et al. Oxidative stress-dependent and -independent death of glioblastoma cells induced by non-thermal plasma-exposed solutions. Sci Rep. 2019;9:13657.
Bi X, Zhang G, Wang X, Nguyen C, May HI, Li X, et al. Endoplasmic reticulum chaperone GRP78 protects heart from ischemia/reperfusion injury through Akt activation. Circ Res. 2018;122:1545–54.
Liu H, Bowes RR, van de Water B, Sillence C, Nagelkerke JF, Stevens JL. Endoplasmic reticulum chaperones GRP78 and calreticulin prevent oxidative stress, Ca2+ disturbances, and cell death in renal epithelial cells. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:21751–9.
Pistritto G, Trisciuoglio D, Ceci C, Garufi A, D’Orazi G. Apoptosis as anticancer mechanism: function and dysfunction of its modulators and targeted therapeutic strategies. Aging (Albany NY). 2016;8:603–19.
Elmore S. Apoptosis: a review of programmed cell death. Toxicol Pathol. 2007;35:495–516.
Guo YJ, Pan WW, Liu SB, Shen ZF, Xu Y, Hu LL. ERK/MAPK signalling pathway and tumorigenesis. Exp Ther Med. 2020;19:1997–2007.
Plotnikov A, Zehorai E, Procaccia S, Seger R. The MAPK cascades: signaling components, nuclear roles and mechanisms of nuclear translocation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011;1813:1619–33.
Shorning BY, Dass MS, Smalley MJ, Pearson HB. The PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway and prostate cancer: at the crossroads of AR, MAPK, and WNT signaling. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:4507.
Zhang Y, Cai W, Han G, Zhou S, Li J, Chen M, et al. Panax notoginseng saponins prevent senescence and inhibit apoptosis by regulating the PI3KAKTmTOR pathway in osteoarthritic chondrocytes. Int J Mol Med. 2020;45:1225–36.
Zheng XY, Yang SM, Zhang R, Wang SM, Li GB, Zhou SW. Emodin-induced autophagy against cell apoptosis through the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in human hepatocytes. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2019;13:3171–80.
Yang J, Sun L, Han J, Zheng W, Peng W. DUSP1/MKP-1 regulates proliferation and apoptosis in keratinocytes through the ERK/Elk-1/Egr-1 signaling pathway. Life Sci. 2019;223:47–53.
Ni M, Zhang Y, Lee AS. Beyond the endoplasmic reticulum: atypical GRP78 in cell viability, signalling and therapeutic targeting. Biochem J. 2011;434:181–8.
Liu R, Li X, Gao W, Zhou Y, Wey S, Mitra SK, et al. Monoclonal antibody against cell surface GRP78 as a novel agent in suppressing PI3K/AKT signaling, tumor growth, and metastasis. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19:6802–11.
Zhou X, Xing X, Zhang S, Liu L, Wang C, Li L, et al. Glucose-regulated protein 78 contributes to the proliferation and tumorigenesis of human colorectal carcinoma via AKT and ERK pathways. Oncol Rep. 2016;36:2723–30.
Xu Y, Fang R, Shao J, Cai Z Erianin induces triple-negative breast cancer cells apoptosis by activating PI3K/Akt pathway. Biosci Rep. 2021;41:BSR20210093.
Jing ZT, Liu W, Xue CR, Wu SX, Chen WN, Lin XJ, et al. AKT activator SC79 protects hepatocytes from TNF-alpha-mediated apoptosis and alleviates d-Gal/LPS-induced liver injury. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2019;316:G387–G396.
Liu J, Yin J, Chen P, Liu D, He W, Li Y, et al. Smoothened inhibition leads to decreased cell proliferation and suppressed tissue fibrosis in the development of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Cell Death Disco. 2021;7:115.
Acknowledgements
We thank the staff at Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University for their help in completing the study.
Funding
This study was supported in part by National Natural Science Foundation of China (N.82070780 and N.81770757). The funders had no role in study design, data collection or analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
XF, JML, DQL, YYZ and YHG contributed equally to this work. XF, JML and DQL designed the experiment and XF wrote the first draft. XF, YYZ and YHG conducted most of the experiments, ZW, SY, WXH, PC and XHW helped to analyze the results and collect the specimens. MED and XHZ critically revised drafts of the manuscript, provided important intellectual input and approved the final version for publication. XF and XHZ contributed to the writing of the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Edited by Professor Alessandro Finazzi-Agrò
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Fu, X., Liu, J., Liu, D. et al. Glucose-regulated protein 78 modulates cell growth, epithelial–mesenchymal transition, and oxidative stress in the hyperplastic prostate. Cell Death Dis 13, 78 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-022-04522-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-022-04522-4
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Integrating spatial transcriptomics and single-cell RNA-sequencing reveals the alterations in epithelial cells during nodular formation in benign prostatic hyperplasia
Journal of Translational Medicine (2024)
-
Capsaicin reduces blood glucose and prevents prostate growth by regulating androgen, RAGE/IGF-1/Akt, TGF-β/Smad signalling pathway and reversing epithelial-mesenchymal transition in streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology (2024)