Abstract
Contemporary diagnosis and management of traumatic dental injuries requires a multifaceted understanding of the pathological and psychological impact over a patient's lifetime. The legacy of dental trauma injuries can have repercussions for the dentition and supporting tissues, requiring complicated multidisciplinary clinical input. Foresight is required to ensure optimal aesthetic and functional outcomes. Mitigating risks and maximising benefits in patients presenting with polytrauma can be challenging, but if optimally managed at the acute presentation, the long-term burden to the patient and the clinician is reduced. This paper aims to discuss the contemporary clinical dilemmas, challenges and controversies related to the management of dental trauma.
Key points
-
Raises awareness of the chronic challenges that dental trauma presents to the profession.
-
Details specific areas where early treatment can mitigate complications.
-
Highlights the need for multidisciplinary care in severe and complicated presentations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
At a conservative estimate, utilising meta-analysis, one billion patients worldwide have suffered a traumatic dental injury (TDI).1 This comprehensive study concluded that TDI is a neglected condition, and could rank fifth among the world's most frequent acute/chronic diseases.1 As the majority of epidemiological research has been conducted on child and adolescent patients, without due consideration for adult trauma, the actual incidence is likely to be significantly higher. Successful management of acute dental trauma largely depends on the severity of the initial injury, age of the patient and the elapsed time to treatment.2 The physical impact commonly results in more than one destructive process that compromises the health of the dental hard and soft tissues of one or more units.
The unattainable ideal would be the complete regeneration of the injured structures. Unfortunately, this has yet to be consistently realised, due to the delay in treatment, a lack of public awareness on prevention, or unmet standards in management.3,4,5 The process of healing begins as soon as the injury occurs. Optimal healing is more likely to materialise with prompt management of either fracture or displacement injuries.6 For example, root fractures that are poorly approximated are unlikely to heal favourably (Fig. 1). Furthermore, the long-term complications of repair rather than regeneration with poorly repositioned luxated teeth can provide extreme restorative challenges (Fig. 2). In comparison, pulpal responses to injuries can vary. Pulp vitality can be maintained post-injury, can be lost, potentially resulting in cessation of root development, or can be maintained, with the odontoblasts reacting in an attempt to preserve health (Fig. 3). Unfortunately, identifying the correct pulpal diagnosis can be fraught with challenges, which is why a strict longitudinal follow-up creates a more reliable clinical narrative.7 Contemporary dental trauma care faces similar issues that need to be addressed by clinicians and researchers for the benefit of the patients. Hence, this review aims to discuss the contemporary clinical dilemmas, challenges and controversies related to the management of dental trauma.
Delivery of acute dental trauma management
Due to the unplanned and unfortunate nature of dental trauma, accessing the right treatment at the right time can be challenging for the patient.8 This may be even more difficult when other simultaneous injuries, potentially life-threatening, take precedence. Patients and emergency services can be forgiven for overlooking oral health in favour of preserving the airway or consciousness (Fig. 4).9
The most time-sensitive injury is avulsion. As a result, it is recommended that replantation should best be conducted by the patient or someone at the scene of the injury. The presence of mind from patients or the public is important, as teeth replanted within 15 minutes have a significantly greater prognosis, which reduces exponentially until 60 minutes and subsequently becomes very poor and unpredictable.10 Therefore, public health initiatives to increase awareness on avulsion management are likely to improve outcomes.11 Engagement with professionals, such as school teachers and emergency care workers, is also likely to reduce the burden on primary and secondary care dental services and the subsequent morbidity and legacy of the injury.12
Once the patient presents to a dentist, the diagnosis of all issues and injuries is vital. In order to maximise time efficiency, a standard protocol for a concise history of neurological trauma (loss of consciousness, amnesia, vomiting) and a description of the traumatic episodes (answering the questions of ‘when', ‘where' and ‘how'), followed by medical history and habits is key. Often, asking for a pre-injury photograph of face and smile are also required, which is especially pertinent with displacement injuries.13
Dental injuries rarely occur in isolation. Often, multiple teeth can be affected, or a single tooth may have several injuries. Severe injuries can distract the attention of the operator, resulting in injuries that go undiagnosed to only be realised at a later date once signs and symptoms develop (Fig. 5).14 Hence, identification of the source of bleeding, haemostasis, removal of dirt and other foreign bodies must precede the clinical examination to improve the visibility and accessibility of the field.
Multiple radiographs from various angulations and soft tissue radiographs are required to ascertain the full extent of fracture lines or broken/displaced tooth or fragments. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) can be utilised in cases that are complex involving multiple units (Fig. 6).15 This needs to be balanced against the relative exposure to the patient and the risks of delayed management for those conditions.
Onward referral to secondary care services may be required to satisfy the gold standard of care that has been internationally recognised.16 Clinicians should be aware of local dental trauma services to reduce unwanted delay in referral. At this stage, the complexity and magnitude of the pathologies may warrant multidisciplinary care, despite appearing costly within insurance or public services.17 This approach takes particular precedence in children and adolescents due to the stage of developing dentition and the likely lifelong legacy of the injury (Fig. 7).18
Psychological component of dental trauma
The prevalence of mental health issues as a result of general trauma is well-documented.19 As might be expected, the mental health component of dental trauma has been investigated to a lesser degree.20 The inter-relationship of mental health and physical health is of paramount importance. Where patients suffer from post-traumatic stress, the constant reminder of the incident through attendance for dental treatment is an undeniable factor to consider in the planning of treatment. This is even more prevalent in children who may develop psychological problems due to a missing anterior unit or an aesthetic issue. In the International Association of Dental Traumatology (IADT) 2020 guidelines, this aspect has been well-documented, with additional emphasis on minimising stress to an already traumatised child.21 As such, multidisciplinary management should extend to the involvement of psychology colleagues to aid mental health healing in tandem with physical healing. Historically, this may not have seemed to be of any crucial importance, but it is considered imperative in contemporary traumatology, as the ability of patients to attend, comply and appreciate the treatment outcomes directly correlates to their mental wellbeing.22 The tangible benefits of psychological management may only become apparent towards the end of treatment, however successful or compromised the outcome may be.
Another aspect that the clinician needs to consider is the stages of grief (Fig. 8). The acute presentation of the patient to the dental setting, where the injury suffered is recent, may coincide with feelings of shock, denial or anger. These phases of emotion can prevent delivery of treatment. For example, patients in denial about the injury may not present soon after the injury as they are struggling to come to terms with the event. Equally, patients managing anger or frustration may struggle with the need for invasive dental treatment or the acceptance of poor prognosis associated with their TDI. Frustratingly, these challenges may be compounded when patients have no experience of dental treatment due to previous optimal oral health. Incorporating input from psychology colleagues within a multidisciplinary environment can improve clinical outcomes.23 Similar psychological issues need to be explored among the sports persons affected by TDI. A phenomenon of ‘kinesiophobia' or fear of re-injury has been identified in athletes with orthopaedic injuries, especially involving the cruciate ligament.24 This makes them anxious and delay their return to practice and competitive sport, ultimately affecting their performance.24 Furthermore, the negative effects of TDI on patients‘ quality of life has been assessed.25 Hence, due consideration should be given in developing a holistic management protocol with adequate follow-up rather than focusing on purely clinical provision of treatment.
Developing dentition
The highest incidence of dental trauma has been reported in the 9-12 years age group, with higher preponderance in boys.1 Therefore, it is expected that a significant quantum of dental trauma management worldwide is either the acute manifestation in an injured adolescent, or the adverse consequences of faulty/failed or even absence of treatment in an older age group or adulthood. As a result, the primary objective should be to preserve pulp vitality and promote apexogenesis of immature roots in the developing dentition (Fig. 9).26
A contemporary issue, rarely addressed by any guidelines, is the presence of primary teeth adjacent to injured permanent teeth requiring splinting. Therefore, flexible splinting in developing dentitions might be done by utilising the firm primary teeth, whose numbers and extent may be determined by the stage of their root resorption or the severity of trauma.
The proximity of the roots of primary anterior teeth to the developing permanent tooth germ puts the permanent successor at risk of long-term sequelae (Fig. 10).
Discolouration
Pulp canal obliteration (PCO) is a process whereby a vital pulp lays down tertiary dentine resulting in a more intense dentine colour, partly due to the increased root wall thickness, and is considered a favourable outcome after dental trauma (Fig. 11, Fig. 12). On average, only 11% of PCO teeth go on to develop pulp necrosis.27 The discolouration is commonly misinterpreted as loss of pulp vitality and inappropriate endodontic treatment may be initiated. The importance of multiple clinical and radiographic findings over a period of time cannot be over-emphasised, which combine to conclude a more definitive pulpal diagnosis.
A more contemporary issue has been the discolouration of traumatised teeth subsequent to endodontic treatment utilising bioceramic materials (Fig. 13).28 Their use is indicated for vital pulp therapy or the management of an open apex. Unfortunately, over time, the bismuth oxide component of mineral trioxide in particular results in dark discolouration. Contemporary hydraulic cements have reduced the risk of discolouration and should be considered by clinicians.
Root resorption
External cervical resorption (ECR) is associated with traumatised teeth, as well as units that have been treated orthodontically.29 The classic signs of a painless pink spot that develops within the crown, signifying a firm subgingival lesion that bleeds on probing, have now been challenged to include a much greater variation in presentation (Fig. 14, Fig. 15).30 Treatment of ECR involves gaining access to the lesion, chemically and mechanically debriding it in its entirety, and providing a restoration for adequate healing (Fig. 16). Unfortunately, early signs of ECR are subtle, but timely diagnosis is a significant component as lesions can engulf the majority of the tooth, making it unsalvageable (Fig. 17).31
Internal inflammatory resorptive lesions provide a different challenge due to changes in the internal root canal anatomy (Fig. 18).32 The resorptive lesion results in an elliptical defect within the root canal anatomy. This necessitates the chemical debridement of the areas that are likely to harbour biofilm and are inherently inaccessible to common mechanical instrumentation.33 As such, irrigation adjuncts are required to aid disruption of the biofilm. This can be achieved through producing shear stresses in the irrigants by ultrasonic devices.34 Once the debridement and preparation stages are completed, obturation can commence with thermoplastic or packable materials or hydraulic cement if the resorption has perforated the root canal wall.
The inability to differentiate between internal and external resorption can result in inappropriate treatment. Therefore, 3D imaging is routinely recommended where there may be ambiguity on a definitive diagnosis before treatment commences.35
External inflammatory root resorption can manifest between 2-8 weeks post-injury, especially after pulpal necrosis (Fig. 19).36 Late manifestation of all these conditions can result in catastrophic outcomes (Fig. 20). As such, early diagnosis of these issues allows for remedial treatment that can avoid destruction in traumatised teeth.
Replacement resorption (ankylosis) is the process whereby a necrosed periodontal ligament results in bone formation along the denuded root surface. This process is most common after severe luxation, intrusion, or delayed re-implantation.36 The tooth has a high-pitched tone on percussion, becomes immobile and cannot accommodate occlusal forces or be moved orthodontically.37 In growing patients the injured tooth is stunted in its position resulting in an incisal edge discrepancy or infra-occlusion (Fig. 21). The aesthetic issue of incisal edge asymmetry may distract from the catastrophic lack of vertical alveolar bone and soft tissue development in this site. This, over the period of many years, can result in a demanding situation when the tooth requires prosthetic replacement.
Decoronation, as described by specialist teams in Scandinavia, aims to promote a favourable outcome where bone and soft tissue can continue to develop.37 This involves removal of the crown and remnant enamel until the cemento-enamel junction, and if possible, induction of bleeding from the apical region (Fig. 22).36 The resorptive process slowly assimilates the root portion and ideally results in an alveolar bone level that is comparable to the adjacent, non-traumatised tooth. Endodontic treatment will not affect the progress of replacement resorption; in fact, the endodontic obturation material can complicate future dental implant surgery. Therefore, endodontics should be performed only if the pulp loses vitality with the canal and can be dressed with calcium hydroxide paste indefinitely rather than obturated with gutta-percha.
Historical peri-radicular disease
One particular challenging aspect of the management of patients who have suffered TDI is the unfortunate development of large lesions associated with multiple teeth (Fig. 23). Correct diagnosis of the offending tooth can be challenging but will avoid inappropriate orthograde or even surgical intervention of the unaffected adjacent teeth, which can, in turn, cloud clinical judgement on future interventions. Due to the extension of the lesion in the bucco-palatal direction, the risk of healing through scar tissue development is increased (Fig. 24).38 Clinicians may consider surgical intervention as the best option, when in reality, the evidence shows that traditional de novo orthograde root canal treatment can resolve large lesions over time and without haste.39
Endodontic regeneration
Loss of vitality of permanent teeth with incomplete root formation is less than ideal because of the inherent lack of mechanical strength due to short root length, wide open apical foramen and thinner dentinal walls, not to mention the necrotic remnants and bacterial degradation products.40 Historically, their endodontic management involved either repeated placement of calcium hydroxide for apexification or endodontic surgery.41 However, with the advent of bioceramics and materials such as mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), the apical barriers can be prepared in one session and the tooth obturated (Fig. 3).42 As previously discussed, this can result in discolouration in an already structurally compromised unit.
To overcome these issues, in the early 2000s, the regenerative endodontic paradigm was developed.43 The techniques that have been described are based on the repopulation of the inner root canal dentine surface with cells from Hertwig's epithelial root sheath and apical papilla.44 Theoretically, these undifferentiated cells develop into pulp cells through contact with the dentine surface and growth factors present on the surfaces. This has been shown to result in the regression of apical lesions, as well as apical closure and continued root development. The continued development of the root anatomy has been sporadic in the nature of its reporting and indeed may be considered ‘hit and miss', despite being biologically lucrative for the patient and the clinician.45
Regenerative endodontics meets the biological needs of a traumatised, non-vital, permanent tooth with incomplete root formation, but predictability of the procedure through research evidence is yet to be realised.46
Hard and soft tissue defects
The greater the severity of dental trauma, the greater the likelihood of involvement and loss of bone within the alveolus. The key aspect for units in the aesthetic zone is the regression of bundle bone connected to the periodontal ligament after avulsion or extraction.47 Once a tooth is avulsed or extracted, the proprioceptive stimulation of the surrounding bone through the tension within the ligament disappears and so begins the process of resorption. This has significant repercussion for future tooth replacement, where the ideal housing of a dental implant within native alveolar bone is unachievable (Fig. 25). Numerous bone augmentation techniques to remedy this issue have been described elsewhere.48 The larger the area that needs to osseointegrate and be perfused, the more challenging and the greater the risks involved (Fig. 26).
The unfortunate reality is that bone grafting in a vertical dimension may not solve the issue of depleted bone stock and clinicians are often forced to consider options other than the provision of dental implants.49
Further, the chronic presentation of a large apical lesion can more than likely result in a post-extraction defect (Fig. 24). These aspects need to be considered carefully during treatment planning. In some cases, the clinician may elect to provide endodontic treatment for an otherwise ‘unrestorable' tooth, purely for the purposes of maintaining or regenerating the apical bone (Fig. 23).
The adjunctive loss of keratinised or ‘scarred' tissue may not be of immediate concern. However, when performing endodontic microsurgery, bone grafting, or dental implant placement, the diminished keratinised tissue or scarred periosteum results in a tissue which is difficult to manipulate and potentially less amenable to the long term-stability of the restorative treatment. Therefore, clinicians should carefully consider the implications of their treatment in the present and possibly more importantly, how it may affect the patient's future options, as the restorative cycle is inevitable.
Dental implant complications
Dental implants, despite being the most modern method of tooth replacement, experience biological and mechanical complications (Fig. 27).50,51,52
Dental implant provision is best delayed until maxillary growth is completed where the likelihood of infra-occlusion is less likely to develop (Fig. 28).53 However, even patients well into adulthood can subsequently present with infra-occlusion of their dental implant.
Peri-implantitis is a known and established disease entity within the world of implantology.54 The disease process results in the inflammation of the peri-implant soft and hard tissues which results in circumferential bone loss (Fig. 29).
This is especially relevant to the dental trauma cohort where implants may be considered the gold standard for anterior tooth replacement (Fig. 30).55 Since trauma prevalence is high in younger patients and so the need for tooth replacement, the likelihood and cumulative risk of complications increases when compared to older cohorts, as the prostheses will be in service for potentially many years or decades.56
A reliable method to manage peri-implantitis has yet to be realised, although risk factors have been identified to aid prevention.57 The presence of periodontal disease, poor oral hygiene and those with systemic disease all present with a greater risk of development.58 As such, clinicians should look to instigate strategies that minimise the development of the disease through recommending smoking cessation, the attainment of systemic health and improving oral hygiene.
The positive and negative effects of social media and dental trauma
The digital age has resulted in a multitude of instant limitless avenues through which we can communicate with one another. This expansive tool allows us to disseminate information quickly and rapidly while also connecting with people anywhere in the world. Due to the relative penetrance of the internet and social media in society, it has also had an undoubted effect on the aetiology and subsequent management of dental trauma.
The unfortunate advent of trolling or online bullying has been shown to manifest itself or result in physical harm, including dental trauma.59 The injuries that may present are severe, but as discussed earlier, the mental component is of paramount consideration. Delivering the news of prognoses of teeth where the outlook is not clear or very poor is likely to need psychologist support. Patients with severe depression or anxiety may not be able to comprehend the need for extensive dental treatment or the loss of teeth at a time.
Digital media can have a positive effect on the management of trauma. Information on how to manage acute conditions, such as avulsions, is widely available on search engines and the IADT ToothSOS app.60 Therefore, the injured person, or any member of the public, can reposition a tooth in a timely and efficient manner and so improving prognosis.61 Such instant relevant information will undoubtedly improve outcomes without any real need for investment in training or resources. Unfortunately, a related phenomenon reported recently was the possibility of TDI due to trips and falls when operating smartphones and related devices.62
Conclusion
Contemporary issues in dental traumatology make it a complicated proposition for healthcare professionals and increase the burden on the affected patients and their families.
Dental professionals should keep themselves updated with recent guidelines and contemporary management modalities so that they are confident to perform remote management, emergency care and follow-up for the benefit of the patient in the short-term, but just as importantly, the long-term legacy. As this cohort will embark on the restorative cycle at a relatively young age, every effort should be made to balance our clinical footprint in the present with potentially limiting any future restorative options.
References
Petti S, Glendor U, Andersson L. World traumatic dental injury prevalence and incidence, a meta-analysis - One billion living people have had traumatic dental injuries. Dent Traumatol 2018; 34: 71-86.
Chauhan R, Rasaratnam L, Alani A, Djemal S. Adult Dental Trauma: What Should the Dental Practitioner Know? Prim Dent J 2016; 5: 70-81.
Giannetti L, Murri A. Clinical evidence and literature to compare two different therapeutic protocols in tooth avulsion. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2006; 7: 122-130.
Tewari N, Bansal K, Mathur V P. Dental Trauma in Children: A Quick Overview on Management. Indian J Paediatr 2019; 86: 1043-1047.
Willis D H, Tong D C, Thomson W M, Love R M. Maxillofacial trauma and the GDP - speciality recognition and patterns of referral. N Z Dent J 2010; 106: 97-102.
Heithersay G S, Kahler B. Healing responses following transverse root fracture: a historical review and case reports showing healing with (a) calcified tissue and (b) dense fibrous connective tissue. Dent Traumatol 2013; 29: 253-265.
Bastos J V, Goulart E M, de Souza Côrtes M I. Pulpal response to sensibility tests after traumatic dental injuries in permanent teeth. Dent Traumatol 2014; 30: 188-192.
Wagle E, Allred E N, Needleman H L. Time delays in treating dental trauma at a children's hospital and private paediatric dental practice. Paediatr Dent 2014; 36: 216-221.
Mihalik J P, Myers J B, Sell T C, Anish E J. Maxillofacial Fractures and Dental Trauma in a High School Soccer Goalkeeper: A Case Report. J Athl Train 2005; 40: 116-119.
Fouad A F, Abbott P V, Tsilingaridis G et al. International Association of Dental Traumatology guidelines for the management of traumatic dental injuries: 2. Avulsion of permanent teeth. Dent Traumatol 2020; 36: 331-342.
Glendor U. Has the education of professional caregivers and lay people in dental trauma care failed? Dent Traumatol 2009; 25: 12-18.
Al-Jundi S H, Al-Waeili H, Khairalah K. Knowledge and attitude of Jordanian school health teachers with regards to emergency management of dental trauma. Dent Traumatol 2005; 2: 183-187.
Djemal S, Singh P. Smartphones and dental trauma: the current availability of apps for managing traumatic dental injuries. Dent Traumatol 2016; 32: 52-57.
Costa Mendes L, Vaysse F, Courtois B, Marty M. Undiagnosed mandibular degloving following dental trauma. Dent Traumatol 2021; 37: 151-154.
Luz L B, Vizzotto M B, Xavier P N, Vianna-Wanzeler A M, Dias da Silveira H L, Montagner F. The Impact of Cone-beam Computed Tomography on Diagnostic Thinking, Treatment Option, and Confidence in Dental Trauma Cases: A Before and After Study. J Endod 2022; 48: 320-328.
Lam R. Epidemiology and outcomes of traumatic dental injuries: a review of the literature. Aust Dent J 2016; 61: 4-20.
Bani-Hani T G, Olegário I C, O'Connell A C. The cost of dental trauma management: A one-year prospective study in children. Dent Traumatol 2020; 36: 526-532.
Agel M, Alani A. The paediatric dentistry-restorative dentistry interface. Br Dent J 2022; 233: 475-482.
Qi W, Gevonden M, Shalev A. Prevention of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder After Trauma: Current Evidence and Future Directions. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2016; 18: 20.
Lee J Y, Divaris K. Hidden consequences of dental trauma: the social and psychological effects. Paediatr Dent 2009; 31: 96-101.
Levin L, Day P F, Hicks L et al. International Association of Dental Traumatology guidelines for the management of traumatic dental injuries: General introduction. Dent Traumatol 2020; 36: 309-313.
Friedlander A H, Mills M J, Wittlin B J. Dental management considerations for the patient with post-traumatic stress disorder. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1987; 63: 669-673.
Jaju R, Tate A R. The role of paediatric dentistry in multidisciplinary cleft palate teams at advanced paediatric dental residency programmes. Pediatr Dent 2009; 31: 188-192.
Theunissen W W, van der Steen M C, Liu W Y, Janssen R P. Timing of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and preoperative pain are important predictors for postoperative kinesiophobia. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2020; 28: 2502-2510.
Lopez D, Waidyatillake N, Zaror C, Mariño R. Impact of uncomplicated traumatic dental injuries on the quality of life of children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health 2019; 19: 224.
Bimstein E, Rotstein I. Cvek pulpotomy - revisited. Dent Traumatol 2016; 32: 438-442.
McCabe P S, Dummer P M. Pulp canal obliteration: an endodontic diagnosis and treatment challenge. Int Endod J 2012; 45: 177-197.
Abuelniel G M, Duggal M S, Kabel N. A comparison of MTA and Biodentine as medicaments for pulpotomy in traumatized anterior immature permanent teeth: A randomized clinical trial. Dent Traumatol 2020; 36: 400-410.
Irinakis E, Aleksejuniene J, Shen Y, Haapasalo M. External Cervical Resorption: A Retrospective Case-Control Study. J Endod 2020; 46: 1420-1427.
Mavridou A-M, Rubbers E, Schryvers A et al. A clinical approach strategy for the diagnosis, treatment and evaluation of external cervical resorption. Int Endod J 2022; 55: 347-373.
Mavridou A-M, Hauben E, Wevers M, Schepers E, Bergmans L, Lambrechts P. Understanding external cervical resorption patterns in endodontically treated teeth. Int Endod J 2017; 50: 1116-1133.
Patel S, Ricucci D, Durak C, Tay F. Internal root resorption: a review. J Endod 2010; 36: 1107-1121.
Umashetty G, Hoshing U, Patil S, Ajgaonkar N. Management of Inflammatory Internal Root Resorption with Biodentine and Thermoplasticised Gutta-Percha. Case Rep Dent 2015; DOI: 10.1155/2015/452609.
Holliday R, Alani A. Traditional and contemporary techniques for optimizing root canal irrigation. Dent Update 2014; 41: 51-58.
Kamburoğlu K, Kurşun S, Yüksel S, Oztaş B. Observer ability to detect ex vivo simulated internal or external cervical root resorption. J Endod 2011; 37: 168-175.
Malmgren B. Ridge preservation/decoronation. J Endod 2013; 39: 67-72.
Campbell K M, Casas M J, Kenny D J. Ankylosis of traumatized permanent incisors: pathogenesis and current approaches to diagnosis and management. J Can Dent Assoc 2005; 71: 763-768.
Cassella E A, Pickett A B, Chamberlin J H. Unusual management problems in the treatment of a long-standing destructive periapical cyst. Report of a case. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1981; 51: 93-98.
Ng Y L, Mann V, Gulabivala K. A prospective study of the factors affecting outcomes of nonsurgical root canal treatment: part 1: periapical health. Int Endod J 2011; 44: 583-609.
Shah A, Peacock R, Eliyas S. Pulp therapy and root canal treatment techniques in immature permanent teeth: an update. Br Dent J 2022; 232: 524-530.
Cvek M. Prognosis of luxated non-vital maxillary incisors treated with calcium hydroxide and filled with gutta-percha. A retrospective clinical study. Endod Dent Traumatol 1992; 8: 45-55.
Duggal M, Tong H J, Al-Ansary M, Twati W, Day P F, Nazzal H. Interventions for the endodontic management of non-vital traumatised immature permanent anterior teeth in children and adolescents: a systematic review of the evidence and guidelines of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2017; 18: 139-151.
Lin J, Zeng Q, Wei X et al. Regenerative Endodontics Versus Apexification in Immature Permanent Teeth with Apical Periodontitis: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study. J Endod 2017; 43: 1821-1827.
Schmalz G, Widbiller M, Galler K M. Clinical Perspectives of Pulp Regeneration. J Endod 2020; 46: 161-174.
Nazzal H, Duggal M S. Regenerative endodontics: a true paradigm shift or a bandwagon about to be derailed? Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2017; 18: 3-15.
Lin L M, Kahler B. A review of regenerative endodontics: current protocols and future directions. J Istanb Univ Fac Dent 2017; 51: 41-51.
Araújo M G, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2005; 32: 212-218.
Jepsen S, Schwarz F, Cordaro L et al. Regeneration of alveolar ridge defects. Consensus report of group 4 of the 15th European Workshop on Periodontology on Bone Regeneration. J Clin Periodontol 2019; 46: 277-286.
Alani A, Austin R, Djemal S. Contemporary management of tooth replacement in the traumatized dentition. Dent Traumatol 2012; 28: 183-192.
Chackartchi T, Romanos G E, Sculean A. Soft tissue-related complications and management around dental implants. Periodontol 2000 2019; 81: 124-138.
Fu J-H, Wang H-L. Breaking the wave of peri-implantitis. Periodontol 2000 2020; 84: 145-160.
Sailer I, Karasan D, Todorovic A, Ligoutsikou M, Pjetursson B E. Prosthetic failures in dental implant therapy. Periodontol 2000 2022; 88: 130-144.
Bohner L, Hanisch M, Kleinheinz J, Jung S. Dental implants in growing patients: a systematic review. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019; 57: 397-406.
Darby I. Risk factors for periodontitis & peri-implantitis. Periodontol 2000 2022; 90: 9-12.
Clark D, Levin L. In the dental implant era, why do we still bother saving teeth? Dent Traumatol 2019; 35: 368-375.
Mameno T, Wada M, Onodera Y, Fujita D, Sato H, Ikebe K. Longitudinal study on risk indicators for peri-implantitis using survival-time analysis. J Prosthodont Res 2019; 63: 216-220.
Schwarz F, Derks J, Monje A, Wang H-L. Peri-implantitis. J Periodontol 2018; 89: 267-290.
De Ry S P, Roccuzzo A, Lang N P et al. Evaluation of the implant disease risk assessment (IDRA) tool: A retrospective study in patients with treated periodontitis and implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs). Clin Oral Implants Res 2021; 32: 1299-1307.
Agel M, Marcenes W, Stansfeld S A, Bernabé E. School bullying and traumatic dental injuries in East London adolescents. Br Dent J 2014; DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.1123.
Duruk G, Gümüşboğa Z Ş. Effectiveness of the ToothSOS App as a training tool for the emergency management of traumatic dental injuries among non-dentists. Dent Traumatol 2022; 38: 229-237.
Traebert J, Traiano M L, Armênio R, Barbieri D B, de Lacerda J T, Marcenes W. Knowledge of lay people and dentists in emergency management of dental trauma. Dent Traumatol 2009; 25: 277-283.
Wilson V, Stone S, McCracken G. Dental trauma: Smartphone hazards. Br Dent J 2016; 221: 149.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Aws Alani, Nitesh Tewari and Gareth Calvert all conceived and produced this article.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Alani, A., Tewari, N. & Calvert, G. Contemporary issues in the management of dental trauma. Br Dent J 235, 946–956 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-023-6564-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-023-6564-4
- Springer Nature Limited