Abstract
Untethered small-scale (from several millimetres down to a few micrometres in all dimensions) robots that can non-invasively access confined, enclosed spaces may enable applications in microfactories such as the construction of tissue scaffolds by robotic assembly1, in bioengineering such as single-cell manipulation and biosensing2, and in healthcare3,4,5,6 such as targeted drug delivery4 and minimally invasive surgery3,5. Existing small-scale robots, however, have very limited mobility because they are unable to negotiate obstacles and changes in texture or material in unstructured environments7,8,9,10,11,12,13. Of these small-scale robots, soft robots have greater potential to realize high mobility via multimodal locomotion, because such machines have higher degrees of freedom than their rigid counterparts14,15,16. Here we demonstrate magneto-elastic soft millimetre-scale robots that can swim inside and on the surface of liquids, climb liquid menisci, roll and walk on solid surfaces, jump over obstacles, and crawl within narrow tunnels. These robots can transit reversibly between different liquid and solid terrains, as well as switch between locomotive modes. They can additionally execute pick-and-place and cargo-release tasks. We also present theoretical models to explain how the robots move. Like the large-scale robots that can be used to study locomotion17, these soft small-scale robots could be used to study soft-bodied locomotion produced by small organisms.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
Our robot is constructed of soft active materials, which can be magnetically actuated to generate desired time-varying shapes16 (see Supplementary Information section S1). Although our robotic system includes both an untethered soft device and the electromagnets that remotely generate the actuating fields (see Supplementary Information section S2 and Supplementary Fig. 2), we refer to only the untethered soft device as a ‘robot’, for consistency with the literature3,4,5,16,18,19. Unlike previous robots constructed with similar materials7,16, our proposed robot design and actuation inputs can achieve multimodal locomotion, and we have concurrently accounted for the robot’s programmed soft-bodied deformation and rigid-body rotation characteristics in different terrains. The choice of magnetic actuation suits various applications because the actuating fields can easily and harmlessly penetrate most biological and synthetic materials3,4. This work uses external (off-board) magnetic actuation only, but it should also be possible to create similar soft machines that use internal (on-board) soft actuation methods20 to produce similar time-varying shapes and rotation.
The magneto-elastic, rectangular-sheet-shaped, soft robot is made of silicone elastomer (Ecoflex 00-10) embedded with hard magnetic neodymium-iron-boron (NdFeB) microparticles that have an average diameter of 5 μm. The surfaces of the robot are hydrophobic, and they can potentially be made biocompatible21 (Supplementary Information section S1C). By following the magnetization process described in Supplementary Information section S1A, the robot can be programmed to have a single-wavelength harmonic magnetization profile m along its body (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1). After m is programmed, the robot can be controlled by a time-varying magnetic field B to generate different modes of locomotion. Unless otherwise specified, B is spatially uniform, and therefore no magnetic forces are applied to translate the robot (Supplementary Information section S15). The uniform B, however, can control the robot’s morphology and steer it to move in a desired direction. To describe the effects of B, we express with respect to the robot’s body frame (Fig. 1a) where Bxy represents the x–y plane components of B, that is, . The interaction between Bxy and m produces spatially varying magnetic torques that deform the robot, and hence controlling Bxy allows us to generate the desired time-varying shapes for the robot. As the deformed robot possesses an effective magnetic moment Mnet (Fig. 1b), which tends to align with B, we can control Bz to rotate the robot about its y axis, steering it along a desired direction (see Supplementary Information section S3B(II)).
Depending on the magnitude of Bxy—that is, Bxy—the robot exhibits different shape-changing mechanisms (Fig. 1b and Supplementary Information section S3A-B). When Bxy is small (for example, < 5 mT) and Bxy is aligned along the two principal directions shown in Fig. 1b (II and III), the prescribed m produces a sine or a cosine shape for the robot. Because the robot’s deformation is small in such conditions, orienting Bxy away from the principal directions generates a weighted superposition of the two basic configurations. Thus, we can create a travelling wave along the robot’s body by using a rotating Bxy that has a small constant magnitude. As the robot’s Mnet is always parallel to the applied Bxy in small-deflection conditions, the robot does not experience any rigid-body magnetic torque and consequent rotation about its z axis (Supplementary Information section S3B(I)). Conversely, when Bxy has high magnitude (for example, Bxy = 20 mT) and is aligned along the principal axis shown in Fig. 1b (IV and V), the robot undergoes a large-deflection shape change, deforming into either a ‘C’- or a ‘V’-shape. However, if the direction of Bxy is not along this principal axis, the deformed robot generates a large Mnet that is generally non-parallel to the applied field, and this makes the robot rotate about its z axis until its Mnet aligns with Bxy (Fig. 1c and Supplementary Information section S3B(I)). At the end of this rotation, the robot will assume its ‘C’- or ‘V’-shape configuration because the generated Mnet in these configurations is naturally aligned with the applied Bxy. Using this mechanism, we can control the robot’s angular displacement about its z axis to enable locomotion modalities like rolling, walking and jumping.
By using the steering and shape-changing mechanisms, we demonstrate all of our robot’s locomotion modes in Figs 2 and 3. When completely immersed in water, the robot can swim upwards and overcome gravity (Fig. 2a, Supplementary Video 1, and Supplementary Information section S10). A periodic B with time-varying magnitude along the principal axis allows the shape of the robot to alternate between the ‘C’- and ‘V’-shapes, enacting a gait similar to jellyfish swimming22. Inertial effects at Reynolds number ranging from 74 to 190 permit this time-symmetric but speed-asymmetric swimming gait to produce fluid vortices that propel the robot to the water surface (Fig. 3c, Supplementary Video 1, and Supplementary Fig. 37). Upon emersion, the soft robot strongly pins at the water–air interface by exposing its hydrophobic surface to air.
Inspired by beetle larva that overcome frictionless barriers by performing quasi-static work on liquid–air interfaces23, the soft robot can climb up a water meniscus by deforming into a ‘C’-shape to enhance its liquid buoyancy without extra energy expenditure (Fig. 2b, Supplementary Video 2 and Supplementary Information section S7). Upon meniscus climbing and reaching contact with an adjacent solid platform, a slow rotating B will make the ‘C’-shaped robot rotate about its z axis. The hydrophobicity of its surface allows the robot to be peeled away from the water surface by such rotation (Fig. 2c, Supplementary Video 2 and Supplementary Information section S11B). In contrast to meniscus climbing, the robot can also dive into the liquid bulk by disengaging from the water–air interface via a fast sequence of downward bending, rotation and flipping (Fig. 2d and Supplementary Information section S11A).
In nature, soft-bodied caterpillars use rolling locomotion to escape from their predators, because this is an efficient and fast way to sweep across solid terrains24. Like caterpillars, our robots can also roll directionally over a rigid substrate or dive from a solid onto a liquid surface (Figs 2e and 3a). This locomotion is enabled by a high-magnitude rotating B (such as B = 18.5 mT), which allows the robot to roll in its ‘C’-shape configuration (Supplementary Video 3 and Supplementary Information section S5). However, the curled-up robot cannot roll across substrate gaps wider than its diameter but narrower than the length of the robot; such gaps can instead be traversed by walking.
Walking is a particularly robust way to move over unstructured surfaces and affords precise tuning of stride length and frequency (Fig. 2f, Supplementary Video 3 and Supplementary Information section S6). Inspired by the walking gait of inchworms25, the robot can walk in a desired direction when we use a periodic B to sequentially adapt its tilting angle and curvature. In each walking cycle, the robot first anchors on its front end to tilt forward so that it can pull its back end forward. The robot then anchors on its back end to tilt backwards and extends its front end to achieve a positive stride in a single cycle.
When the walking robot is blocked by narrow openings, it can mimic another caterpillar locomotion24 and use an undulating gait to crawl through the obstacle (Fig. 2g, Supplementary Video 4 and Supplementary Information section S9). Crawling is encoded by a rotating B to produce a longitudinal travelling wave that propels the robot along the direction of the wave. A similar control sequence additionally enables the robot to produce an undulating gait to swim efficiently on liquid surfaces26 (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Video 6). In contrast to crawling, however, the undulating swimming direction is antiparallel with the direction of the travelling waves. Although previous robots with multi-wavelength, harmonic magnetization profiles have also demonstrated undulating swimming locomotion7, such robots have not been able to create the critical ‘C’- and ‘V’-shapes necessary to realize multimodal locomotion.
Like nematodes27, the soft robot can jump over obstacles that are too high or too time-consuming to roll or walk over, by imparting an impulsive impact on a rigid surface (Fig. 2h, Supplementary Video 5 and Supplementary Information section S4). The B control sequence prompts both the robot’s rigid-body rotation, which specifies the jumping direction, and elastic deformations to maximize the momentum of its free ends before striking the substrate. This sequence of B is specified in the robot’s local y–z plane, where By is used for inducing the shape-changing mechanism, whereas the rigid-body rotation of the robot is induced by both By and Bz.
To illustrate the robot’s potential to navigate across unstructured environments (Supplementary Information section S13), we demonstrate that the robot can use a series of locomotion modes to fully explore a hybrid liquid–solid environment (Fig. 3 and Supplementary Video 6) and a surgical human stomach phantom (Fig. 4a, Supplementary Video 7 and Supplementary Information section S14A). Heading towards an in vivo ultrasound-guided operation, we also show that the robot can be visualized by an ultrasound medical imaging device as it rolls within the concealed areas of ex vivo chicken muscle tissue (Fig. 4b, Supplementary Video 8, Supplementary Information section S14B and Supplementary Fig. 44). The soft robot can additionally accomplish functional tasks like gripping an object and transporting it to a targeted location (Fig. 4c and Supplementary Video 9), as well as ejecting a cargo that is strapped onto the robot (Fig. 4d, Supplementary Video 10 and Supplementary Information section S14C).
In addition to magnetic field-induced torques, magnetic gradient-based pulling forces could also be used to enhance locomotion performance (for example, speed and jumping height). Moving along this direction, we show that the jumping height can be increased by adding magnetic gradient-based pulling forces (Supplementary Video 5), and we will explore other similar possibilities in the future. Using gradient-based pulling exclusively may however be detrimental, as the dynamics of this actuation method is inherently unstable28. From a practical standpoint, gradient-based pulling methods are also less energy efficient than locomotion propelled via magnetic field-based torques29 (Supplementary Information section S15).
The lack of an on-board actuation method prevents the proposed robot from operating in large open spaces, making it unsuitable for outdoor applications such as environment exploration and monitoring. Furthermore, the current demoulding process creates a pre-stress in the magneto-elastic material that induces a small residual curvature in the robot when it is in the rest state (shape I in Fig. 1b and Supplementary Information section S1D). Although the pre-stress does not hinder the robot from achieving multiple modes of locomotion and could be reduced through improved fabrication, it induces small errors in the predicted robot shapes (shapes II and V in Fig. 1b) and partly affects the model matching of the experimental data for the walking and undulating swimming speeds (Supplementary Information sections S6 and S8).
To understand small-scale soft-bodied robot locomotion better, we devised theoretical models to perform a scaling analysis on how the robot’s dimensions (L, w and h, shown in Fig. 1a) would affect the jumping, rolling, walking, meniscus-climbing and undulating swimming locomotion modalities (Supplementary Information sections S4–S8). The theoretical models for the crawling and jellyfish-like swimming locomotion are too difficult to be derived, so we instead used the experimental data in Supplementary Information sections S9–S10 to derive corresponding fitting models. From our theoretical and fitting models, we predict that a larger L and a smaller h are always preferred for multimodal locomotion because a longer and thinner rectangle shape helps the robot to move faster and jump higher. The models also suggest that w would affect only the jellyfish-like swimming locomotion and that minimizing w would increase the swimming speed. There are, however, practical lower bounds for both h and w, because our current fabrication technique has difficulties in creating robots that have h < 40 μm and w < 0.3 mm. Likewise, the practical upper bound of L is typically constrained by the size requirements of specific applications and the maximum allowable workspace of the electromagnetic coil setup that generates the spatially uniform B. A more detailed summary for the scaling analysis and fabrication limits can be found in Supplementary Information section S12.
To validate the theoretical models, we compared them against extensive experimental characterizations conducted across robots with differing dimensions. In general, except for the undulating swimming locomotion, the experimental data agree well with our models (see Supplementary Information sections S4–S8, S12 and Supplementary Table 4). Detailed discussions pertaining to the theoretical and experimental discrepancy for the undulating swimming locomotion can be found in Supplementary Information section S8. These analyses may also provide useful design guidelines for optimizing the performance of future miniature robots that have multimodal locomotion.
We intend to use our robot to study small-scale soft-bodied locomotion on other complex terrains such as within non-Newtonian fluids and on granular media30. We also plan to scale down the robots to the sub-millimetre scale and to investigate their potential in vivo medical applications.
Data Availability
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the published article and its Supplementary Information, and are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Chung, S. E., Dong, X. G. & Sitti, M. Three-dimensional heterogeneous assembly of coded microgels using an untethered mobile microgripper. Lab Chip 15, 1667–1676 (2015)
Ceylan, H., Giltinan, J., Kozielski, K. & Sitti, M. Mobile microrobots for bioengineering applications. Lab. Chip 17, 1705–1724 (2017)
Nelson, B. J., Kaliakatsos, I. K. & Abbott, J. J. Microrobots for minimally invasive medicine. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 12, 55–85 (2010)
Sitti, M. et al. Biomedical applications of untethered mobile milli/microrobots. Proc. IEEE 103, 205–224 (2015)
Sitti, M. Miniature devices: voyage of the microrobots. Nature 458, 1121–1122 (2009)
Sitti, M. Mobile Microrobotics (MIT Press, 2017)
Diller, E., Zhuang, J., Lum, G. Z., Edwards, M. R. & Sitti, M. Continuously distributed magnetization profile for millimeter-scale elastomeric undulatory swimming. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 174101 (2014)
Huang, H. W., Sakar, M. S., Petruska, A. J., Pané, S. & Nelson, B. J. Soft micromachines with programmable motility and morphology. Nat. Commun. 7, 12263 (2016)
Maeda, S., Hara, Y., Sakai, T., Yoshida, R. & Hashimoto, S. Self-walking gel. Adv. Mater. 19, 3480–3484 (2007)
Miyashita, S ., Guitron, S ., Ludersdorfer, M ., Sung, C. R. & Rus, D. An untethered miniature origami robot that self-folds, walks, swims, and degrades. IEEE Int. Conf. on ‘Robotics and Automation’ 1490–1496, http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7139386/ (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 2015)
Koh, J. S. et al. Jumping on water: surface tension-dominated jumping of water striders and robotic insects. Science 349, 517–521 (2015)
Yuk, H., Kim, D., Lee, H., Jo, S. & Shin, J. H. Shape memory alloy-based small crawling robots inspired by C. elegans. Bioinspir. Biomim. 6, 046002 (2011)
Diller, E. & Sitti, M. Three-dimensional programmable assembly by untethered magnetic robotic micro-grippers. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24, 4397–4404 (2014)
Rus, D. & Tolley, M. T. Design, fabrication and control of soft robots. Nature 521, 467–475 (2015)
Wehner, M. et al. An integrated design and fabrication strategy for entirely soft, autonomous robots. Nature 536, 451–455 (2016)
Lum, G. Z. et al. Shape-programmable magnetic soft matter. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, E6007–E6015 (2016)
Aguilar, J. et al. A review on locomotion robophysics: the study of movement at the intersection of robotics, soft matter and dynamical systems. Rep. Prog. Phys. 79, 110001 (2016)
Diller, E., Giltinan, J., Lum, G. Z., Ye, Z. & Sitti, M. Six-degree-of-freedom magnetic actuation for wireless microrobotics. Int. J. Robot. Res. 35, 114–128 (2016)
Kummer, M. P. et al. OctoMag: an electromagnetic system for 5-DOF wireless micromanipulation. IEEE Trans. Robot. 26, 1006–1017 (2010)
Hines, L., Petersen, K., Lum, G. Z. & Sitti, M. Soft actuators for small-scale robotics. Adv. Mater. 29, 1603483 (2017)
Amjadi, M., Yoon, Y. J. & Park, I. Ultra-stretchable and skin-mountable strain sensors using carbon nanotubes-Ecoflex nanocomposites. Nanotechnology 26, 375501 (2015)
Gemmell, B. J. et al. Passive energy recapture in jellyfish contributes to propulsive advantage over other metazoans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 17904–17909 (2013)
Hu, D. L. & Bush, J. W. M. Meniscus-climbing insects. Nature 437, 733–736 (2005)
Brackenbury, J. Caterpillar kinematics. Nature 390, 453 (1997)
Wang, W. et al. Locomotion of inchworm-inspired robot made of smart soft composite (SSC). Bioinspir. Biomim. 9, 046006 (2014)
Taylor, G. Analysis of the swimming of microscopic organisms. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A. 209, 447–461 (1951)
Campbell, J. F. & Kaya, H. K. How and why a parasitic nematode jumps. Nature 397, 485–486 (1999)
Zhang, X. D., Mehrtash, M. & Khamesee, M. B. Dual-axial motion control of a magnetic levitation system using Hall-effect sensors. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 21, 1129–1139 (2016)
Abbott, J. J. et al. How should microrobots swim? Int. J. Robot. Res. 28, 1434–1447 (2009)
Aguilar, J. & Goldman, D. I. Robophysical study of jumping dynamics on granular media. Nat. Phys. 12, 278–283 (2016)
Acknowledgements
W.H. thanks the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation for financial support. This work is funded by the Max Planck Society. We thank Z. Burghard and A. Diem from the University of Stuttgart for evaluating the Young’s modulus of our robots, K. Suppelt and S. Meyer from Fujifilm Visualsonics for their help with the ultrasound-guided experiments, and the members from Physical Intelligence Department at the Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems for their comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.S., W.H., G.Z.L. and M.M. proposed and designed the research. W.H. performed all experiments. G.Z.L. developed all theoretical and empirical models, except for the meniscus-climbing model, which was developed by M.M. The experimental data were analysed by W.H., G.Z.L. and M.M. All authors wrote the paper and participated in discussions.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
Max Planck Innovation filed a provisional patent application on behalf of all authors (PCT/EP2017/084408) based on the methods and results presented here.
Additional information
Reviewer Information Nature thanks K.-J. Cho, R. Kramer-Bottiglio and B. Mazzolai for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
This file contains supplementary data S1-S15, figures S1-S45 and S1-S4. (PDF 8617 kb)
Jellyfish-like swimming
The video sequentially shows jellyfish-like swimming in slow motion (Fig. 2a), visualization of the fluid vortices produced by the jellyfish-like swimming locomotion as traced by 45 μm beads (Fig. S37), and arrest of the jellyfish-like swimming locomotion when B flipping is stopped. (MP4 1737 kb)
Meniscus climbing and landing
The video sequentially shows the robot climbing a water meniscus (Fig. 2b) and landing on a solid platform (Fig. 2c). (MP4 1162 kb)
Rolling and walking
The video sequentially presents rolling (Fig. 2e) and straight walking (Fig. 2f), demonstrates steered walking, and a comparison of using rolling or walking to cross a gap. (MP4 1404 kb)
Crawling
The video presents the relationship between the traveling wave produced on the soft robot body and the crawling direction (Fig. 2g), and demonstrates that the robot’s crawling direction can be flipped by reversing the direction of the traveling wave. (MP4 1100 kb)
Jumping
The video first presents the directional jumping locomotion shown in Fig. 2h. Subsequently, it presents the straight jumping locomotion, which is induced solely via the shapechange mechanism. It further shows how the straight jumping locomotion can be affected by different vertical magnetic field spatial gradients. Finally, it presents a control experiment in which a robot that has a homogenous magnetization profile is unable to jump, as opposed to a robot with a harmonic magnetization profile. (MP4 2128 kb)
Multimodal locomotion
The video presents the sequence of Fig. 3, whereby the soft robot navigates through different terrains by combining all the discussed locomotion modes. (MP4 3990 kb)
Multimodal locomotion in a surgical phantom
The video presents the soft robot navigating through a stomach phantom by a combination of meniscus climbing, landing, rolling and jumping, also shown in Fig. 4a. In the video, the robot moves very quickly at around 00:34 because it is pulled by unwanted magnetic gradient-based pulling forces generated by the spatial gradients of B. (MP4 1147 kb)
Ultrasound-guided locomotion
The video shows ex-vivo ultrasound-guided locomotion of the soft robot (Fig. 4b and Fig. S44). Jellyfish-like swimming, rolling and crawling are respectively demonstrated in three different biological phantoms. (MP4 2039 kb)
Cargo transport
The video demonstrates gripping, transportation and release of a cargo by the soft robot (Fig. 4c). (MP4 908 kb)
Cargo delivery
The video demonstrates selectively triggered cargo release by a modified soft robot (Fig. 4d and Fig. S45). (MP4 962 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hu, W., Lum, G., Mastrangeli, M. et al. Small-scale soft-bodied robot with multimodal locomotion. Nature 554, 81–85 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25443
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25443
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Focused ultrasound enables selective actuation and Newton-level force output of untethered soft robots
Nature Communications (2024)
-
Stenus-inspired, swift, and agile untethered insect-scale soft propulsors
Nature Communications (2024)
-
Bioinspired electronics for intelligent soft robots
Nature Reviews Electrical Engineering (2024)
-
Magnetic steering continuum robot for transluminal procedures with programmable shape and functionalities
Nature Communications (2024)
-
Fracture-driven power amplification in a hydrogel launcher
Nature Materials (2024)