Introduction

Obesity remains a substantial problem in the United States with approximately 35% of American adults classified as obese (body mass index (BMI) >30 kg m2) in 2011–2012.1 Obese individuals are at a higher risk of developing an array of health problems including hypertension, atherosclerosis, type 2 diabetes and cancer.2, 3 Although BMI is frequently used in clinical settings to establish risk status, there is variation in individual risk of developing cardiometabolic disease at any given BMI.2 Recent evidence strongly suggests that the factor mediating the association between obesity and health outcomes is the amount of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) rather than the amount of either subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) or total body fat.2 VAT accumulation is strongly associated with unfavorable lipid profiles, insulin resistance, elevated diastolic blood pressure,4 arterial stiffness and overall poor cardiovascular health.5 In addition, analyses of interventions that increase physical activity (PA) and restrict caloric intake show that reductions in VAT, not SAT, mediate improvement in cardiometabolic risk factors such as triglyceride levels, cardiorespiratory fitness,6 high-density lipoprotein7 and insulin sensitivity.8

Numerous randomized controlled trials provide evidence for a beneficial effect of PA on VAT, particularly those involving aerobic PA interventions.7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 These studies, however, have been limited primarily to Caucasian participants, with limited data on other racial/ethnic groups. The association between PA, VAT, cardiometabolic disease and overall mortality may differ by ethnicity. In a multi-ethnic cross-sectional analysis, the inverse association between self-report PA and VAT was significantly stronger for Filipinas than for white and black women.14 In addition, Lesser et al.15 demonstrated that while both self-reported moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA) and vigorous physical activity were associated with VAT in Chinese and European subjects, only vigorous physical activity was associated with VAT in South East Asians. Furthermore, some studies suggest that the association between PA and diabetes is stronger for White Americans than for African Americans, Hispanics or Asian Pacific Islanders.16

To our knowledge, there are no studies comparing the association between objective measures of PA and VAT among Latino and non-Latino adults. Although research suggests that PA reduces BMI and total body fat in Latinos,17, 18, 19, 20 data regarding VAT are sparse. Given the higher prevalence of obesity among Latinos (42.5%) compared with whites (32.6%), and the significant increase in the prevalence of obesity among Latinos from 1999 to 2010,21 it is particularly important to investigate the extent to which PA may influence changes in VAT in this population.

In this study, we evaluated the association between objectively measured PA and body composition derived from anthropometry and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) among overweight or obese Latino and non-Latino adults. Given their established influence on body composition, both age and sex were taken into account in the analyses.22 Although the World Health Organization (WHO) currently recommends 150 min of moderate or 75 min of vigorous PA per week accumulated in bouts lasting at least 10 min for the prevention of non-communicable disease and optimal health,23 decreases in VAT, BMI and waist circumference have been reported for PA bouts lasting <10 min.24, 25, 26, 27 Thus, we also explored if PA performed in very short bouts (that is, <10 min) was associated with body composition in this sample.

Materials and methods

Study sample

Baseline data were analyzed from 298 overweight/obese adults enrolled in a 12-month randomized controlled trial that tested the efficacy of text messaging to improve weight-related outcomes. Participants were recruited from San Diego and were required to be 21–61 years old, moderately overweight or obese (BMI>27–39.8 kg m2), own a cell phone capable of sending and receiving automated text messages, not taking medications that could cause weight gain and have no history of eating disorders or weight loss surgery. In this study, participants with fewer than 5 days of accelerometry-based PA data or missing baseline DXA data were excluded from analysis, leaving 236 participants (96 Latino and 140 non-Latino). Inclusion/exclusion criteria were pre-established. Those excluded did not differ on the basis of sex, ethnicity or BMI, but were younger than those included (mean ageexcluded= 38.94±10.74 years vs mean ageincluded=42.64±10.72 years; P=0.016, two sided). This study was approved by the University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA, Institutional Review Board (Project # 091040) and all participants provided written informed consent.

Measurement methods

Objective PA levels were measured using waist-worn ActiGraph GT1M and/or GT3X+ accelerometers (ActiGraph, LLC, Pensacola, FL, USA). Participants were asked to wear the ActiGraph for at least 7 days and were prompted twice via telephone during the monitoring period to assist with compliance. A valid day consisted of >10 h of wear time. Data were collected as counts at 30-s epochs. MVPA and vigorous physical activity were defined using the Troiano count thresholds of 2020 and 5999 counts min–1, respectively.28 A bout consisted of MVPA lasting ⩾10 min allowing for an interruption of up to 2 min anywhere within the bout. All accelerometer data extraction, processing and scoring were performed using the most up-to-date version of ActiLife software (ActiGraph, Pensicola, FL, USA).

Body weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg using a calibrated digital scale, and height (without shoes) was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using a stadiometer. BMI was calculated from height and weight as kg m2. To assess body fat and VAT, participants underwent full body DXA scans conducted by an experienced technician certified by the state of California. The use of DXA and CoreScan/enCORE Software (GE/Lunar, Madison, WI, USA) has been recently validated for assessing VAT, and was reported to correlate strongly to expert readings of computed tomography-derived VAT in both men and women across a wide range of ages and BMIs.29, 30 Regions of interest were automatically determined by the software and adjusted as needed by a trained technician, then verified by a study investigator with experience in DXA-derived body composition. Body fatness was expressed as the percentage of fat mass relative to total body mass; VAT was expressed in grams.

Statistical methods

Descriptive statistics (proportions, means and s.d.) were used to describe the demographic characteristics. Multivariable linear regression assessed associations between body composition (BMI, percent body fat and VAT) and multiple measures of MVPA adjusting for sex, age, ethnicity (Latino or non-Latino) and ActiGraph wear time. MVPA outcome variables of interest included: (1) average minutes of MVPA per day (MVPA), (2) average minutes of MVPA performed in bouts of ⩾10 min per day (MVPA bouts), (3) average minutes of MVPA performed in <10-min bouts (non-bouts MVPA) and (4) a yes/no binary determined upon performing at least 150 min of MVPA in bouts of ⩾10 min (Meeting Guidelines). Residuals from each model with a continuous MVPA variable were plotted. The assumption of homoscedasticity was met for each model. The modifying influences of sex, age and ethnicity in the relationship between total MVPA and body composition were modeled independently with multiplicative interaction terms. For the interaction analyses, age was entered as a binary variable after creating a median split at 43 years. For the multivariate adjusted models, means and coefficients were reported with their associated standard error terms. Associations and interactions were considered significant if P⩽0.05. Given the exploratory nature of this analysis, additional adjustments were not made for multiple comparisons. All analyses were performed using Stata 14.0 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA).

Results

Descriptive statistics of the total sample

Participants were predominantly female (78%), educated and employed with an average age of 43 years. Forty-one percent of the sample was Latino (Table 1). The sample mean BMI, percent body fat and VAT mass was 32.6 kg m–2, 43.1% and 1.3 kg, respectively. On average, participants performed 25 min of MVPA per day of which approximately two-thirds were not completed in bouts.

Table 1 Sample characteristics

Body composition

The average BMI, percent body fat and VAT for each sex, ethnicity and age group obtained from the regression models are shown in Table 2. On average, women had lower BMI, higher percent body fat and lower VAT than did men; older individuals had higher BMI, percent body fat and VAT than did younger individuals. The differences in body composition between Latinos and non-Latinos were small, with Latinos evidencing slightly higher BMI (32.59 vs 31.15 kg m–2), lower percent body fat (47.42 vs 48.15%) and higher VAT (838.68 vs 631.08 g) than non-Latinos. Variance between comparison groups was similar.

Table 2 Multivariable adjusteda mean (s.e.) body composition

Associations between MVPA and body composition

Table 3 shows the associations between each MVPA variable and body composition variables controlling for sex, age, ethnicity and accelerometer wear time. All measures of MVPA were significantly and negatively associated with percent body fat (P<0.05). A 30-min daily increase in MVPA was associated with a 2% average decrease in body fat. The associations between MVPA and BMI were significant for non-bouts MVPA and approached significance for total MVPA. For every 30-min increase in non-bouts MVPA, BMI decreased by 1.5 kg m–2. Similarly, the associations between PA and VAT were significant only for MVPA and non-bouts MVPA. Every 30-min increase in MVPA and non-bouts MVPA were associated with a 123 and 249 g decrease in VAT, respectively.

Table 3 Multivariable adjusteda association between PA and body composition

Interactions by age, sex and ethnicity

There was a significant interaction between ethnicity and MVPA in predicting percent body fat such that a given increase in MVPA was associated with a greater decline in body fat in non-Latinos. There was no interaction between ethnicity and MVPA in predicting VAT or BMI (Table 4). Figure 1 shows the unadjusted regression models for BMI, percent body fat and VAT vs MVPA for Latinos and non-Latinos.

Table 4 Multivariable adjusteda interactions between MVPA and covariates in predicting body composition
Figure 1
figure 1

Unadjusted body composition vs MVPA by ethnicity. (a) BMI. (b) % body fat. (c) VAT.

There was a significant interaction between age and MVPA in predicting BMI and body fat such that a given increase in MVPA was associated with a larger decrease in BMI and body fat in older individuals. There were no interactions between sex and MVPA in predicting any of the body composition variables (Table 4).

Discussion

The primary aims of this study were to investigate the relationship between PA and body composition in a sample consisting of approximately half Latino adults, and to compare this relationship between Latinos and non-Latinos. In the entire sample, MVPA was negatively associated with BMI, percent body fat and VAT. Meeting 150-min bout guidelines was associated with lower body fat, but was not significantly associated with lower BMI or VAT. In general, the associations between non-bouts of MVPA and body composition were stronger than the associations between MVPA completed in bouts of ⩾10 min. These results may be partially explained by the fact that approximately two-thirds of the total MVPA accumulated by participants was in bouts lasting <10 min. Nonetheless, these results support previous literature suggesting that accumulating MVPA in short bouts is associated with lower BMI, less total body fat and VAT.24, 25, 26, 27

The inverse relationship between MVPA and percent body fat was stronger for non-Latinos than for Latinos. These findings support literature suggesting that the relationship between PA and body composition may differ by race or ethnicity.15, 16 However, research in Latinos is limited especially regarding VAT. A variety of factors could explain this finding such as differences in lifestyle, socioeconomic status, diet and eating habits, rates of fat oxidation during exercise,14, 15, 16 and regional fat distribution. Several studies demonstrate that at a given BMI, the amount and distribution of body fat tends to differ by ethnicity. For example, at a BMI <30 kg m–2, Latin-American women tend to have more body fat than European-American and African-American women, whereas at a BMI >35 kg m2, European-American women tend to have more body fat than the other groups.31 Other work has shown that at a given BMI, Latinos tend to have more trunk fat32 and VAT volume measured by computed tomography,33 and that Latino men tend to accumulate more VAT for a given increase in BMI.33 This study found that when controlling for sex, age and PA, Latinos tend to have less total percent body fat, but more VAT, suggesting that Latinos have greater VAT relative to total percent body fat. Supporting this conclusion, Carroll et al.33 showed that Latinos have a higher L4L5 VAT to subcutaneous fat ratio than do white women. However, to our knowledge, no other studies have directly compared total percent body fat and total VAT between Latinos and non-Latinos while controlling for PA.

Interestingly, the relationship between MVPA and body composition did not differ between Latinos and non-Latinos for VAT or BMI. These results suggest that changes in VAT and BMI in response to MVPA may be less influenced by ethnicity than is total body fatness. Although a causal relationship cannot be inferred because of the correlational nature of this analysis, if true, it would have important implications for weight loss management and counseling across ethnicities. For example, for a given change in MVPA, Latinos may notice less change in total body fat compared with their non-Latino counterparts, but may be experiencing similar health benefits because of declining VAT.

Interactions were also found between age and PA and their association with body composition such that for a given increase in MVPA, the decreases in BMI and percent body fat were greater for older individuals. This implies that older individuals may require a lower amount of PA to obtain similar benefits in maintaining a healthy BMI and body fatness compared with younger adults.

Strengths of this study included a large proportion of Latino adults, the collection of objective PA data by accelerometry and the use of validated DXA software to assess total body fat and VAT. To our knowledge, it is also the first head-to-head comparison of the association between MVPA and body composition in Latino and non-Latino adults. Limitations included the disproportionately small number of men and the correlational nature of the analyses. We also did not differentiate between weekend or weekday accumulation of MVPA. Although patterns of PA may influence body composition and mortality,34 our goal in this study was to investigate the relationship between body composition and total bout accumulation regardless of when or how the bouts were accumulated. Finally, multiple measures of PA were used and P-values were unadjusted for multiple testing, increasing the likelihood of type I error. Thus, longitudinal studies with precise measurement of PA and body composition and large sample sizes are needed to clarify the interactions between ethnicity and PA in predicting body composition.

In conclusion, this study found that a given increase in MVPA was associated with a larger decrease in percent body fat in non-Latinos than in Latinos. The relationship of MVPA with VAT and BMI, however, did not differ by ethnicity. Future work is needed to verify these relationships and link these outcomes to cardiovascular and metabolic disease risk.