Abstract
Knowing the potential distribution of species helps to focus conservation efforts more effectively, mainly when dealing with endangered species. The aim of this study was to generate potential distribution models for four species of small wild felids in Mexico (Leopardus pardalis, Leoparduswiedii, Lynx rufus and Puma yagouaroundi). The models were generated based on felids presence records, and topographic, anthropic and vegetation drivers. We used 473 records (171 for L. pardalis, 140 for L. wiedii, 86 for L. rufus and 76 for P. yagouaroundi) to build eleven models per species to then select the three with the best performance and included them in ensemble models. These were based on the formula of the weighted average, which considers the performance of the algorithms evaluated with a subsample of testing records, from which the area under the curve is calculated. In this way, in the ensemble model the consistent zones between algorithms are included, but the one with the best performance predominates. The species with the largest potential distribution area was L. pardalis with 34.3% of the national territory, while L. rufus had the smallest area (14.3%). In the four species a unique set of variables was identified that influence the probability of presence, however the altitude, the arid vegetation and the population density were important variables for three of the four species. We verified our models with recently published presence records. The results of this study reflect a robust analysis of the current and potential distribution of four species of wild felids in Mexico. In addition to being the first step to develop effective conservation strategies at national and local levels.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anderson, R.P., Lew, D., Peterson, A.T., 2003. Evaluating predictive models of species distributions: criteria for selecting optimal models. Ecol. Modell. 162, 211-232, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00349-6.
Aranda, M., 2005. Puma yagouaroundi. In: Ceballos, G., Oliva, G. (Eds.), Los mamíferos silvestres de México. CONABIO - UNAM - Fondo de Cultura Económica, México D.F, pp. 358-369.
Aranda, M., Valenzuela-Galván, D., 2015. Registro notable de margay (Leopardus wiedii) en el bosque mesófilo de montana de Morelos, México. Rev. Mex. Biodivers. 86, 1110-1112, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmb.2015.09.015.
Araújo, M., Pearson, R., Thuiller, W., Erhard, M., 2005. Validation of species climate impact models under climate change. Glob. Chang. Biol. 11, 1504-1513, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.01000.x.
Aubry, K.B., Raley, C.M., McKelvey, K.S., 2017. The importance of data quality for generating reliable distribution models for rare, elusive, and cryptic species. PLoS One 12 (6), e0179152, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179152.
Ávila-Villegas, S., Lamberton-Moreno, J., 2013. Wildlife survey and monitoring in the sky Island region with an emphasis on neotropical felids. In: Gottfried, Gerald J., Ffolliott, Peter F., Gebow, Brooke S., Eskew, Lane G., Collins, Loa C. (Eds.), Merging Science and Management in a Rapidly Changing World: Biodiversity and Management of the Madrean Archipelago III and 7th Conference on Research and Resource Management in the Southwestern Deserts; 2012 May 1-5; Tucson, AZ. Proceedings. RMRS-P-67. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, pp. 441-447.
Campbell, L., 2003. Jaguarundi. In: Endangered and Threatened Animals of Texas Their Life History and Management. Wildlife Division. 4200 Smith School Road Austin, Texas 78744.
Ceballos, G., Blanco, S., González, C., Martínez, E., 2006. ‘Lynx rufus. Distribución potencial’. Extraído del proyecto DS006’ Modelado de la distribución de las especies de mamíferos de México para un análisis GAP.
Center for International Earth Science Information Network-CESIN-Columbia University and Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical -CIAT-, 2010. Gridded Population of the World, Versión 3 (GPWv3): Population Density Grid, Future Estimates. NASA Socioeconomic Data and Aplications Center SEDAC, Palisades, NY (Accessed 15.05.2016).
Céspedes-Flores, S., Moreno-Sánchez, E., 2010. Estimación del valor de la pérdida de recurso forestal y su relación con la reforestación en las entidades federativas de México. Investigación ambiental 2, 5-13.
Clark Labs, 2006. Idrisi 15: the Andes edition. Clark Photo Labs, Worcester, Massachusetts, MA, USA.
CONABIO, 2015. NATURALISTA Plataforma de Ciencia (Accessed: 20-05-2015) https://doi.org/www.gob.mx/conabio/prensa/naturalista?idiom=es).
Coronado-Quibrera, W., 2011. Distribución geográfica y ecológica del jaguarundi (Pumayaguaroundi) en el estado de San Luis Potosí, México. Master thesis. Colegio de Postgraduados. Montecillo, Texcoco, Edo. de México.
Crooks, K., Burdett, C., Theobald, D., Rondinini, C., Boitani, L., 2011. Global patterns of fragmentation and connectivity of mammalian carnivore habitat. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 366, 2642-2651, doi: [10.1098/rstb.2011.0120].
Domíguez-Vega, H., Monroy-Vilchis, O., Balderas-Valdivia, C., Gienger, C.M., Ariano-Sánchez, D., 2012. Predicting the potential distribution of the beaded lizard and identification of priority areas for conservation. J. Nat. Conserv. 20 (4), 247-4253, https://doi.org/10.1016/jjnc.2012.04.003.
Drake, J.M., Bossenbroek, J.M., 2009. Profiling ecosystem vulnerability to invasion by zebra mussels with support vector machines. Theor. Ecol. 4, 189-198, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12080-009-0050-8.
Engler, R., Guisan, A., Rechsteiner, L., 2004. An improved approach for predicting the distribution of rare and endangered species from occurrence and pseudo-absence data. J. Appl. Ecol. 41, 263-274, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00881.x.
Espinosa, C., Trigo, T., Tirelli, F., Gonc¸alves da Silva, L., Eizirik, E., Queirolo, D., Mazim, D., Peters, F., Favarini, M., de Freitas, T., 2017. Geographic distribution modeling of the margay (Leopardus wiedii) and jaguarundi (Puma yagouaroundi): a comparative assessment. J. Mammal. 1, 252-262, https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyx152.
Ferraz, K., Ferraz, S., Cunha de Paula, R., Beisiegel, B., Breitenmoser, C., 2012. Species distribution modeling for conservation purposes. Natureza Conservac¸ao 10(2), 214-220.
Grigione, M., Menke, K., López-González, C., List, R., Banda, A., Carrera, J., Carrera, J., Giordano, A., Morrison, J., Sterrnberg, M., Thomas, R., Van, B., 2009. Identifying potential conservation areas for felids in the USA and Mexico: integrating reliable knowledge across an international border. Oryx 43, 78-86, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605308002019.
Guisan, A., Zimmermann, N., 2000. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol. Modell. 135, 147-186, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00354-9.
Haddad, N., Brudving, L., Clobert, J., et al., 2015. Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems. Sci. Adv. 1 (2), e1500052, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500052.
Haines, A., Tewes, M., Laack, L., 2005. Survival and sources of mortality in ocelots. J. Wildl. Manag. 69, 255-263.
Hanley, J., McNeil, B., 1982. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143, 29-36, https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747.
Hartley, S., Harris, R., Lester, P., 2006. Quantifying uncertainty in the potential distribution of an invasive species: climate and the Argentine ant. Ecol. Lett. 9, 068-1079, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00954.x.
Hirzel, A.H., Hausser, J., Chessel, D., Perrin, N., 2002. Ecological-niche factor analysis: how to compute habitat-suitability maps without absence data? Ecology 83 (7), 2027-2036.
Hirzel, A., Arlettaz, R., 2003. Modelling habitat suitability for complex species distribucions by environmental-distance geometric mean. J. Environ. Manage. 32, 614-623, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-0040-3.
Hirzel, A., Hausser, J., Perrin, N., URL: 2004. Biomapper4.0. Lab. of Conservation Biology, Department of Ecology and Evolution. University of Lausanne https://doi.org/www.unil.ch/biomapper.
Hodge, A., 2014. Habitat selection of the margay (Leopardus wiedii) in the eastern Andean foothills of Ecuador. Mammalia 78, 351-358, https://doi.org/10.1515/mammalia-2013-0070.
Holbrook, J., Caso, A., De Young, R., Tewes, M., 2013. Population genetics of jaguarundis in Mexico: implications for future research and conservation. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 37, 336-341, https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.246.
INE (Instituto Nacional de Ecología), 2007. Transformación de los Sistemas Naturales de México (Accessed: 20.05.2016) https://doi.org/www2.ine.gob.mx/publicaciones/libros/43/dos.html#top.
INEGI (Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía), Escala 1:250 000. Serie VI 2015. Conjunto de datos vectoriales de Uso del suelo y vegetación. https://doi.org/www.beta.inegi.org.mx/temas/mapas/usosuelo/.
INEGI (Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía), 2014. INEGI (Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía) (Accessed: 20.05.2016) https://doi.org/www.inegi.org.mx/geo/contenidos/topografia/topografia1m.aspx.
Liu, C., Berry, P., Dawson, T., Pearson, R., 2005. Selecting thresholds of occurrence in the prediction of species distribution. Ecography 28, 385-393, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0906-7590.2005.03957.x.
Marmion, M., Parviaenen, M., Luoto, M., Heikkinen, R., Thuiller, W., 2009. Evaluation of consensus methods in predictive species distribution modelling. Divers. Distrib. 15, 59-69, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00491.x.
Martínez-Calderas, J., Rosas-Rosas, O., Martínez-Montoya, J., Tarango-Arámbula, L., Clemente-Sánchez, F., Crosby-Galván, M., Sánchez-Hermosillo, M., 2011. Distribución del ocelote (Leopardus pardalis) en San Luis Potosí, México. Rev. Mex. Biodivers. 82, 997-1004, https://doi.org/10.22201/ib.20078706e.2011.3.
Muñoz, M., Giovanni, R., Siqueira, M., Sutton, T., Brewer, P., Pereira, R., Canhos, D., Canhos, V., 2009. openModeller: a generic approach to species’ potential distribution modelling. GeoInformatica 15, 111-135, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10707-009-0090-7.
Newbold, T., 2010. Applications and limitations of museum data for conservation and ecology, with particular attention to species distribution models. Prog. Phys. Geogr.: Earth Environ. 34 (1), 3-22, https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133309355630.
Ortega-Huerta, M., Vega-Rivera, J., 2017. Validating distribution models for twelve endemic bird species of tropical dry forest in western Mexico. Ecol. Evol. 19, 7672-7686, https://doi: 10.1002/ece3.3160.
Pearson, R., Dawson, T., Liu, C., 2004. Modelling species distributions in Britain: a hierarchical integration of climate and land-cover data. Ecography 27, 285-298, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0906-7590.2004.03740.x.
Pérez-Irineo, G., Santos-Moreno, A., 2014. Density, distribution, and activity of the ocelot Leopardus pardalis (Carnivora: felidae) in Southeast Mexican rainforests. Rev. Biol. Trop. 62, 1421-1432, https://doi.org/10.15517/RBT.V62I4.12941.
Peterson, A., Papes, M., Eaton, M., 2007. Transferability and model evaluation in ecological niche modeling: a comparison of GARP and Maxent. Ecography 30, 550-560, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0906-7590.2007.05102.x.
Phillips, S., Anderson, R., Schapire, R., 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol. Modell. 190, 231-259, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026.
Pliscoff, P., Fuentes-Carrillo, T., 2011. Modelación de la distribución de especies y ecosistemas en el tiempo y en el espacio: una revisión de las nuevas herramientas y enfoques disponibles. Rev. Geogr. Norte Gd. 48, 61-79, https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-34022011000100005.
Ramírez-Bravo, O., Bravo-Carrete, E., Hernández-Santín, C., Schinkel-Brault, S., Kinnear, C., 2010. Ocelot (Leopardus pardalis) distribution in the state of Puebla, Central Mexico. Therya 1, 111-120, https://doi.org/10.12933/therya-10-12.
Roberts, N., Crimmins, S., 2010. Bobcat population status and management in North America: evidence of large-scale population increase. J. Fish Wildl. Manag. 1, 169-174, https://doi.org/10.3996/122009-JFWM-026.
Rocha-Mendes, F., Bianconi, G., 2009. Opportunistic predatory behavior of margay, Leopardus wiedii (Schinz, 1821) in Brazil. Mammalia 73, 151-152, https://doi.org/10.1515/MAMM.2009.017.
Romero, R., 2005. Lynx rufus. In: Ceballos, G., Oliva, G. (Eds.), Los mamíferos silvestres de México: 362-364. CONABIO - UNAM - Fondo de Cultura Económica, México D.F.
SEMARNAT (Secretaría del Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales), 2009. Inventario Nacional Forestal y de Suelos México 2004-2009. Una herramienta que da certeza a la planeación, evaluación y el desarrollo forestal de México. Press, Zapopan, Jalisco, México.
Stockman, A., Beamer, D., Bond, J., 2006. An evaluation of a GARP model as an approach to predicting the spatial distribution of non-vagile invertebrate species. Divers. Distrib. 12, 81-89, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1366-9516.2006.00225.x.
Stockwell, D., Peters, D., 1999. The GARP modelling system: problems and solutions to automated spatial prediction. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 13, 143-158.
Sunquist, M., Sunquist, F., 2002. Wild Cats of the World. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
USGS (United States Geological Survey), 2007. Shuttle Radar Topography Mision (SRTM) 3-arc Second ARTM Format Documentation. USGS/NASA https://doi.org/www.edc.usgs.gov/products/elevation/srtmbil.html.
Valdez-Jiménez, D., García-Balderas, M., Quintero-Díaz, G., 2013. Presencia del ocelote (Leopardus pardalis) en la “Sierra del laurel”, municipio de Calvillo, Aguascalientes, México. Nota científica. Acta Zoológica Mexicana (n.s.) 29, 688-692.
Valenzuela, D., Vázquez, L, 2007. Consideraciones para priorizar la conservación de carnívoros mexicanos. Pp. 197-214 inTópicos en sistemática, biogeografía, ecología y conservación de mamíferos. Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, Pachuca, México.
Velazco-Macías, C., Peña-Mondragón, J., 2015. Nuevo registro de ocelote (Leopardus pardalis) en el estado de Nuevo León, México. Acta Zoológica Mexicana (n.s.) 31, 470-472.
Zarco-González, M., Monroy-Vilchis, O., Alaníz, J., 2013. Spatial model of livestock predation by jaguar and puma in Mexico: conservation planning. Biol. Conserv. 159, 80-87, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.11.007.
SEMARNAT (Secretaría del Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales), 2010. PROYECTO de Modificación del Anexo Normativo III, Lista de especies en riesgo de la Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM 059 SEMARNAT 2010, Protección ambiental-Especies nativas de México de flora y fauna silvestres-Categorías de riesgo y especificaciones para su inclusión, exclusión o cambio-Lista de especies en riesgo, publicada el 30 de diciembre de 2010.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Monroy-Vilchis, O., Zarco-González, Z. & Zarco-González, M.M. Potential distribution and areas for conservation of four wild felid species in Mexico: Conservation planning. Mamm Biol 98, 128–136 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2019.09.003
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2019.09.003