Abstract
Study Design
Cross-sectional study.
Objective
To determine motivations for compliance with bracing among female patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).
Summary of Background Data
Bracing prevents the need for surgery for the majority of girls with AIS with curves of 20° to 40° and 2 or more years of growth remaining. The main obstacle to success is compliance. The factors that either promote or impede compliance previously have not been fully clarified.
Methods
Participants were females 10 to 16 years of age who were prescribed a brace to be worn 16 hours per day for AIS. Each completed a “Scoliosis Compliance Questionnaire” composed of the SRS-22r and five original sections focused on patients’ attitudes to scoliosis, situations in which they found wearing the brace to be most and least difficult, factors that motivate brace wear, and interventions that could potentially improve compliance.
Results
Thirty-nine subjects completed the study, mean age 13 years (range 11–15 years), at a mean of 15.4 months (range 4–39 months) of brace wear at the time of recruitment. More than 90% of patients stated that their main motivations for compliance were the desire to avoid surgery and to prevent curve progression. Compliance was most challenging during the summer and while at school. Many patients reported pain and skin irritation in the brace. The majority reported they would likely improve their hours of wear if they were able to communicate with a peer in the same situation. SRS-22r scores were similar to those of healthy adolescents.
Conclusions
The most important influences promoting brace wear are the patient’s desire to avoid surgery and to prevent curve progression. Peer support potentially may improve compliance.
Level of Evidence
Level III.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Wright JG, et al. Effects of bracing in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. N Engl J Med 2013;369:1512–21.
Katz DE, Herring JA, Browne RH, et al. Brace wear control of curve progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010;92:1343–52.
Sanders JO, Newton PO, Browne RH, et al. Bracing for idiopathic scoliosis: how many patients require treatment to prevent one surgery? J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014;96:649–53.
Karol LA, Virostek D, Felton K, et al. Effect of compliance counseling on brace use and success in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2016;98:9–14.
Schwieger T, Campo S, Weinstein SL, et al. Body image and quality-of-life in untreated versus brace-treated females with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2016;41:311–9.
Misterska E, Glowacki M, Latuszewska J. Female patients’ and parents’ assessment of deformity- and brace-related stress in the conservative treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012;37:1218–23.
Deceuninck J, Bernard JC. Quality of life and brace-treated idiopathic scoliosis: a cross-sectional study performed at the Centre des Massues on a population of 120 children and adolescents. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2012;55:93–102.
Danielsson AJ, Hasserius R, Ohlin A, et al. Body appearance and quality of life in adult patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with a brace or under observation alone during adolescence. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012;37:755–62.
Parent EC, Wong D, Hill D, et al. The association between Scoliosis Research Society-22 scores and scoliosis severity changes at a clinically relevant threshold. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010;35:315–22.
Danielsson AJ, Hasserius R, Ohlin A, et al. Health-related quality of life in untreated versus brace-treated patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a long-term follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010;35:199–205.
Aulisa AG, Guzzanti V, Perisano C, et al. Determination of quality of life in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis subjected to conservative treatment. Scoliosis 2010;5:21.
Vasiliadis E, Grivas TB. Quality of life after conservative treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Stud Health Technol Inform 2008;135:409–13.
Pham VM, Houlliez A, Carpentier A, et al. Determination of the influence of the Chêneau brace on quality of life for adolescent with idiopathic scoliosis. Ann Readapt Med Phys 2008;51:3–8. 9–15.
Ugwonali OF, Lomas G, Choe JC, et al. Effect of bracing on the quality of life of adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine J 2004;4:254–60.
Asher M, Min Lai S, Burton D, et al. Discrimination validity of the scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire: relationship to idiopathic scoliosis curve pattern and curve size. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003;28:74–8.
Morton A, Riddle R, Buchanan R, et al. Accuracy in the prediction and estimation of adherence to bracewear before and during treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 2008;28:336–41.
Glattes RC, Burton DC, Lai SM, et al. The reliability and concurrent validity of the Scoliosis Research Society-22r patient questionnaire compared with the Child Health Questionnaire-CF87 patient questionnaire for adolescent spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007;32:1778–84.
Daubs MD, Hung M, Neese A, et al. Scoliosis Research Society-22 results in 3052 healthy adolescents aged 10–19 years. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2014;39:826–32.
Lai SM, Burton DC, Asher MA, et al. Converting SRS-24, SRS-23, and SRS-22 to SRS-22r. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011;36:E1525–33.
Carreon LY, Sanders JO, Diab M, et al. The minimum clinically important difference in Scoliosis Research Society-22 appearance, activity, and pain domains after surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010;35:2079–83.
Verma K, Lonner B, Hoashi JS, et al. Demographic factors affect Scoliosis Research Society-22 performance in healthy adolescents: a comparative baseline for adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010;35:2134–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Author Disclosures
EMB (none); DGA (none).
This study was approved by the Penn State College of Medicine Institutional Review Board and consent was obtained for participation from the parent/guardian of each participant.
Funding Sources
None.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brigham, E.M., Armstrong, D.G. Motivations for Compliance With Bracing in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. Spine Deform 5, 46–51 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2016.09.004
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2016.09.004