Abstract
Biomass has become a key contender in the race to find sustainable energy options, as we move toward a more environmentally friendly future. This extensive assessment explores the potential of biomass to transform the global energy landscape. We have examined different conversion technologies, including thermal technologies such as combustion and gasification, as well as biochemical technologies such as anaerobic digestion and biofuel production, and we delved into the renewable nature of biomass, which is derived from organic sources such as agricultural residues, forestry waste, and special energy crops. We highlight the adaptability of biomass for the production of energy, heat, and biofuels. Furthermore, we evaluated the socioeconomic and environmental impacts of biomass use, including greenhouse gas emissions, land use, and community effects. To increase the potential of biomass as a renewable energy source, it is essential to understand how these three factors interact. To maximize energy production while curtailing environmental problems, this review examines obstacles, ongoing research, and recent developments in effective biomass-based energy systems.
Graphical Abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Owing to rising energy demand, depleting fossil fuel supplies, and environmental concerns, energy crises have emerged as a serious worldwide issue. In this study, the severity of the global energy issue was examined and the need for sustainable energy solutions was emphasized [1, 2]. The existing energy landscape and the necessity for prompt action were illuminated by statistical data. The primary energy demand increased by 4.6% in 2021, driving an increase in global energy consumption fueled by emerging economies such as China and India [3]. Coal, oil, and natural gas continue to dominate the world's energy mix, accounting for approximately 80% of all energy used in 2020 [4]. Oil reserves could last 50 years and coal stockpiles several centuries, however, there are concerns about the finite nature of fossil fuel deposits [5]. Additionally, the burning of fossil fuels results in record-high greenhouse gas emissions, with the world's CO2 output hitting 36.8 billion metric tons in 2019 [6, 7]. Now more than ever, there is a dire need to cut emissions and switch to low-carbon opportunities.
Renewable energy sources, such as biomass, solar, wind, hydropower, and geothermal energy, have emerged as competitive substitutes for fossil fuels [8, 9]. Governments, legislators, and international organizations are putting more effort into encouraging the development of renewable energy sources to combat climate change, lessen reliance on fossil fuels, and attain energy security [10]. The largest renewable source, hydropower, was used to generate 29% of the world's electricity in 2021, followed by wind and solar [11]. Investments in renewable energy technology have been rising as their potential has become more widely understood. Therefore, evaluating the contribution of biomass and other renewable energy sources in the search for a greener and more sustainable future relies critically on knowing the global energy environment [12].
Any organic material derived from plants, animals, or microorganisms is referred to as biomass [13]. It comes in a variety of forms, including organic waste, wood pellets, energy crops, and agricultural residues [14]. On the other hand, biomass energy is the energy produced when biomass is transformed into heat, electricity, or liquid fuels. The advantages of biomass over other renewable energy sources include its consistent energy supply, ability to use organic waste, and ease of integration into current infrastructure for a smooth transition to renewable energy [15, 16].
Various techniques and technologies for conversions are used in the generation of biomass energy. Biomass combustion, which involves burning organic resources to produce heat and power, is one popular technique [17]. Biogas is created during the breakdown of organic waste by anaerobic digestion. Pyrolysis or the Fischer–Tropsch method, can also be used to convert biomass into liquid fuel. The Fischer–Tropsch technique is a catalytic chemical process that produces liquid hydrocarbons like gasoline and diesel from syngas, which is a mixture of hydrogen and carbon monoxide. Although it does not directly involve pyrolysis, this is an alternative process for turning biomass into liquid fuels. 400–600 °C are typical high temperatures for this process, depending on the particular feedstock and desired output [18]. Biomass is heated through thermal gasification to produce syngas, which can be used for power generation, heating, or as feedstock for chemicals and biofuels. These innovations help to ensure a sustainable future by utilizing biomass energy. The processes of gasification, combustion, pyrolysis, enzymatic hydrolysis, and fermentation have been reviewed by Osman et al. [19] Low temperature (below 300 °C) and high-temperature (above 300 °C) thermochemical processes include gasification, combustion, and pyrolysis. Pyrolysis is one of the most promising and oldest used techniques because it can function at temperatures as low as 500 °C, which is considerably lower than the gasification temperature range of 800–1300 °C. Azeta et al. [20] also reported the pyrolysis of coconut biomass into sustainable energy.
The importance of biomass energy has increased owing to several reasons. First, biomass can be replaced by organic processes such as plant and tree growth, which is why it is regarded as a renewable energy source [21]. It differs from fossil fuels, which have a limited supply and cause environmental issues, such as climate change. Second, using biomass energy results in a net-zero carbon footprint because the CO2 released during biomass combustion is balanced by the CO2 absorbed during biomass growth [22, 23]. According to the International Renewable Energy Agency (IREA), doubling the proportion of renewable energy by 2030 would result in a 12% decrease in worldwide CO2 emissions connected to energy. Biomass effectively minimizes greenhouse gas emissions [24]. Additionally, biomass energy uses organic waste to produce useful energy while reducing pollution and greenhouse gas emissions from landfills. A study by Liang-Nian [25] revealed that Soybean dregs were used to create Nitrogen-rich porous carbon materials with up to 4% nitrogen content and a variety of nitrogen forms. The materials' impressive CO2 adsorption capabilities at 0 °C and 25 °C at air pressure were 6.3 and 3.6 mmol/g, respectively [26]. They also contain ultra micro pores and nitrogen-containing groups. According to Dinesha et al. [27], biomass that has been pyrolyzed or hydrothermally carbonized (HTC) into char has been shown to have excellent CO2 adsorption capacity.
Additionally, biomass cultivation, harvest, processing, and distribution jobs are created by the production and use of biofuels, boosting rural economies [28]. Additionally, the rise of the biofuel industry attracts funding for research and development (R&D), technological developments, and infrastructure, which further stimulates economic growth [29]. Utilizing biofuels will help create a more diverse and sustainable energy sector, which will benefit local economies, jobs, and overall economic resilience [30, 31].
This review paper explores the various ways that biomass can be used to produce green energy, showing its promise as a clean, sustainable energy source. We seek to provide a thorough understanding of the role biomass plays in the shift to a greener energy environment by investigating diverse biomass conversion methods, such as combustion, anaerobic digestion, pyrolysis, and thermal gasification. The economic, environmental, and social advantages of using biomass are also covered in this review study, with a focus on how it helps with the creation of new job opportunities, waste management, energy security, and lower greenhouse gas emissions. By highlighting the various ways in which biomass is used in green energy, we seek to stimulate additional study, the creation of new regulations, and the use of biomass-based solutions to the top-priority problems faced by our energy system.
2 Biomass resources for green energy
There is enormous potential to produce clean, renewable energy from various biomass sources. We may lessen our reliance on fossil fuels and alleviate the environmental effects of conventional energy sources by utilizing the power of agricultural residues, energy crops, forestry waste, and organic municipal trash. In addition to being a feasible option, the use of biomass for green energy also opens up opportunities for effective waste management, rural development, and the transition to a greener and more sustainable future [32]. Here's a summary of the many biomass feedstocks, which include forestry waste, energy crops, agricultural residues, and organic municipal garbage.
2.1 Agricultural wastes
The byproducts and waste products produced during agricultural operations are commonly referred to as agricultural residues. Crop wastes such as corn stalks, wheat straws, rice husks, and sugarcane bagasse are among these products as shown in the Table 1. These leftovers from agricultural operations are plentiful and widely accessible. Agricultural waste products can be utilized as biomass feedstock for a variety of purposes, such as the manufacture of biofuels, bioenergy, and bioproducts [33]. Hafif et al. [34] reviewed the usage of rice husk and straw for sustainable and greener energy production. In another study by Alisaraei et al. [35], wheat straw is discussed as a source of biofuels.
2.2 Forestry trash
Forestry waste is made up of byproducts and remnants from logging and the maintenance of forests. This contains sawdust, bark, tree-tops, and branches. Environmental pollution is a result of frequent burning or abandonment of forestry debris which is shown in Fig. 1. However, it can be used as biomass feedstock for a variety of purposes, such as the production of heat and power, biofuels, and wood-based products. Borowski [36] and Navarre [37] reported the conversion of bamboo bark and birch bark for green energy and biofuel production. Ali et al. [38] agriculturalists all over the world produce a wide range of crop residues that can be treated and produced in different ways to turn them into biofuels. These methods include thermochemical conversion (combustion, pyrolysis, gasification, and hydrothermal liquefaction), biochemical conversion (microbial fermentation, enzymatic hydrolysis, and anaerobic digestion), and chemical treatment (transesterification, for example).
2.3 Organic municipal garbage
Organic municipal waste, also referred to as organic or green waste, is biodegradable waste produced by homes, eateries, and other organic waste-producing establishments. This comprises trash made of paper, yard waste, and food scraps. Organic municipal garbage can be handled by anaerobic digestion or composting to create biogas or nutrient-rich compost, rather than ending up in landfills where it will eventually add to greenhouse gas emissions [39, 40]. Anaerobic digestion, composting, and biomass combustion are a few examples of creative methods that can transform these materials into useful energy sources. Green trash and yard waste can be composted to create nutrient-rich soil amendments, while food waste and biosolids can be anaerobically digested to produce biogas, a sustainable energy source high in methane. Paper, wood refuse, and agricultural wastes can all be used as fuel in biomass boilers to produce heat and power. Communities may contribute to a cleaner, more sustainable energy future while simultaneously reducing landfill waste by utilizing the energy potential of organic municipal trash.
2.4 Energy crops
These plants are grown expressly for their ability to produce biomass. These plants have a high energy content and can be utilized to produce power or as a renewable source of fuel. Trees like poplar, willow, and miscanthus are examples of energy crops. These plants can be gathered and processed for biomass energy applications, and are grown in marginal soils that are unsuitable for food crops [41]. Stanton [42] reported on the usage and economic impact of hybrid poplar biomass production for biofuels and bioproducts in the Pacific Northwest. Similarly, Paul et al. [43] showed that rubber trees can also be used as a source of green energy. A graphical representation of all the possible sources of biomass is given below in Fig. 2,
It's essential to remember that the selection of biomass feedstock is influenced by a variety of variables, including regional availability, logistical concerns, and the particular requirements of the intended use. These biomass feedstocks can be transformed into useful forms like biofuels, heat, electricity, and bioproducts using a variety of technologies and methods, which further contribute to a more ecologically friendly and sustainable energy industry [46,47,48].
2.5 Solid waste
Solid waste is an important biomass resource for the production of energy. It includes municipal solid waste (MSW), agricultural residues, and forestry residues. Solid waste can be transformed into sustainable energy sources by procedures like gasification, combustion, and anaerobic digestion. Organic waste is broken down via anaerobic digestion, producing biogas—mainly carbon dioxide and methane—that can be used to heat buildings or generate energy. Combustion plants produce heat by burning solid waste, which is then utilized to produce steam or direct electricity. Solid waste can be directly used for heat and power or converted into liquid fuels through the process of gasification, which turns it into syngas [49, 50].
3 Biomass conversion technologies
Technologies for converting biomass resources into useful forms of energy, fuels, and chemicals include a variety of procedures. These technologies are essential for using biomass as a long-term replacement for fossil fuels, lowering greenhouse gas emissions, and facilitating the path to a more ecologically friendly energy source and are shown in the Fig. 3.
3.1 Combustion
There are benefits and drawbacks to using combustion as a strategy to turn biomass into biofuels. Direct combustion is one of the main methods for burning biomass; in this method, the biomass is burned to produce heat, which is then utilized to create power or heat industrial operations [51, 52]. This approach has the benefit of being reasonably mature and straightforward because it can make use of infrastructure already in place for fossil fuel combustion [53]. In addition, using biomass to produce energy can be economical. But when biomass is burned directly, greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide and nitrogen oxides are released into the atmosphere, causing air pollution and climate change [54]. Furthermore, the efficiency of biomass combustion is typically lower than that of other bioenergy conversion processes [55, 56]. A study by Marangwanda et al. [57] presented that particle drying, devolatilization, heterogeneous combustion, and homogeneous combustion are all combustion models. Particle tracking, heat transfer, and turbulence simulations are examined as supporting models. The goals of recent developments in biomass combustion technology have been to increase fuel flexibility, lower emissions, and improve efficiency. Accurate regulation of combustion parameters is made possible by enhanced automation and control technologies, which raise energy conversion efficiency and reduce pollution emissions. More biomass feedstocks, including as agricultural wastes and municipal solid waste, may be used thanks to innovative combustion procedures like gasification and fluidized bed combustion. Integrating with combined heat and power (CHP) facilities optimizes energy use and fosters sustainability in the generation of green energy.
3.2 Pyrolysis
By thermally degrading biomass in the absence of oxygen, pyrolysis is a promising method for converting biomass to bioenergy. Fast pyrolysis, which quickly raises biomass temperatures, has benefits including a larger output of bio-oil and a priceless feedstock for fuels and chemicals [58]. The volatility of bio-oil and the high-energy requirements of the process are obstacles as well [59, 60]. The process of converting biomass into bioenergy and biofuels is depicted in the Fig. 4, which also includes a detailed description of the pyrolysis procedure.
Slow pyrolysis, which results in a higher proportion of biochar and has benefits including increased stability and lower energy needs, creates heat at a slower rate [61]. However, slow pyrolysis produces a reduced output of bio-oil, which restricts its ability to produce liquid fuels [62]. Amrullah et al. [63] proposed in his work that In a batch-style reactor, U. lactuca underwent gradual pyrolysis at 400–600 °C for 10–50 min. The analysis revealed large amounts of amines/amides (15.33–23.31%), phenolics (9.73–31.89%), carboxylic acids (22.63–35.28%), and N-aromatic compounds (14.04–15.68%) in the bio-oil. The final study showed that the atomic ratios of carbon and oxygen in the biochar were lower than those in the feedstock, indicating that dehydration and decarboxylation events occurred during pyrolysis. Although both strategies offer potential, more work must be done to increase their effectiveness and overcome their drawbacks [64,65,66].
Catalytic pyrolysis improves biomass conversion by using catalysts to transform biomass into useful products. It has benefits like enhanced selectivity, enabling management of product attributes and composition. Higher-value chemicals and fuels may be produced as a result [67]. Additionally, catalytic pyrolysis can reduce energy requirements and operating temperatures, thereby increasing the total energy efficiency [68, 69]. However, the complexity of catalyst design and selection, expense, deterioration of the catalyst, and potential deactivation by contaminants in the biomass feedstock are obstacles. Current research focuses on creating reliable and affordable catalysts and improving the circumstances of the reaction in catalytic pyrolysis [70,71,72]. Wang et al. [73] reported the catalytic pyrolysis of biomass with Ni/Fe-CaO-based catalysts for hydrogen gas production and found that the most favorable reaction conditions for the generation of H2 are 650°C in the presence of Ni–Fe/CaO, according to thermodynamic simulation and pyrolysis tests.
Recent advancements in biomass pyrolysis have completely changed the industry and provided effective means of using biomass for resource recovery and energy production. Key developments in biomass pyrolysis technology are shown below in Fig. 5.
3.3 Gasification
To create versatile synthesis gas, which is made up of carbon monoxide, hydrogen, and trace gases, gasification uses partial oxidation of biomass [74]. Gasifiers with fluidized beds, updrafts, and downdrafts are among the methods. It has the advantages of efficient energy utilization and the capacity to produce power, industrial feedstock, and biofuels. Whereas other factors are also involved in viable energy systems as shown in Fig. 6. However, difficulties include the need for high-quality feedstock, high installation, and operating capital costs, and the difficulty of cleaning and conditioning syngas for effective use [75,76,77].
The ultimate success of gasification as a bioenergy conversion method depends on overcoming these technological and financial obstacles [78]. Using Aspen Plus software, Martins et al. [79] investigated three different biomass gasification methods (conventional, plasma, and supercritical water). By modifying the steam-to-biomass ratio, gasifier temperature, pressure, and biomass moisture, they were able to maximize hydrogen generation. The hydrogen output increased with higher SBR and lower feed concentration, while supercritical water gasification demonstrated a considerable increase in the hydrogen molar percentage at 400–600 °C. The pressure adjustments had no effect, and more hydrogen was produced when the moisture content of the biomass was higher.
3.4 Anaerobic digestion
In the process of converting biomass, anaerobic digestion uses microorganisms that break down organic material in the absence of oxygen to create biogas that is largely made up of methane and carbon dioxide [80, 81]. Anaerobic digesters have a variety of shapes and sizes, such as continuously stirred tank reactors, plug flow digesters, and anaerobic lagoons [82]. The ability to handle organic waste and wastewater while simultaneously producing renewable biogas for energy is one of the many benefits of anaerobic digestion. Digestate, a byproduct of this process that is rich in nutrients and can be utilized as a natural fertilizer, is also produced. However, anaerobic digestion systems can be sensitive to changes in feedstock composition, necessitating careful management and monitoring [83]. The method's slowness in comparison to other bioenergy conversion techniques restricts the types of biomasses that may be used and makes greater reactor volumes necessary for commercial-scale operations. The need for investment in digesters and biogas upgrading might be a barrier to wider adoption, and the economics of anaerobic digestion significantly depends on the availability of adequate feedstock [84, 85]. Yogeli et al. [86] reported the anaerobic digestion of some of the biomass sources and found that a handsome amount of calorific values can be obtained via these fuels given in Table 2 [86, 87].
Technological developments in anaerobic digestion increase process stability and biogas output through enhanced reactor designs and co-digestion procedures. While composting and nitrogen recovery from digestate maximize value and improve sustainability, advanced monitoring systems optimize conditions. Its potential for sustainable energy generation and waste management is highlighted by examples such as its application in wastewater treatment plants and on-farm digesters [87].
4 Bioenergy from biomass
A viable route toward developing a more sustainable energy system is the conversion of biomass to heat and power. This renewable energy strategy offers various important benefits by utilizing the organic resources obtained from plants, animals, and waste goods [89]. Through sustainable techniques, biomass may be constantly renewed, lowering greenhouse gas emissions and mitigating climate change [90]. Direct combustion or gasification methods are used to convert biomass into heat, producing thermal energy for district heating and industrial use [91]. Burning biomass produces steam, which powers turbines attached to electricity generators to produce electricity. Some systems' inclusion of waste heat recovery improves total energy efficiency even more [92]. According to Islam Fattah [93], under 40% operational efficiency, palm oil biomass can provide about 5000 MW of power. Malaysia's yearly dependency on coal may have been replaced by this substantial electricity potential.
One of the best-case studies for the production of biomass-based heat and electricity is the Danish Skaerbkvrket Power Plant. It functions as a biomass-based CHP plant and burns primarily wood pellets, wood chips, and agricultural waste [94]. The facility, which has a capacity of approximately 390 MW for electricity generation and approximately 810 MJ/s for heat generation, is vital for sustainably supplying Denmark's energy demands [95, 96]. Fluidized-bed boiler technology, which generates steam to power turbines for electricity generation and district heating, is essential for its operational efficiency. This facility serves as an example of the environmental advantages and carbon savings possible through biomass utilization by utilizing 1.2 million tons of biomass annually and reducing over 1.1 million tons of CO2 emissions [97, 98].
Additionally, by utilizing organic materials and waste products to produce electricity and heat, biomass power plants play a vital part in the shift to renewable energy sources. The ability of biomass power plants to reduce greenhouse gas emissions is one of their main benefits. The carbon dioxide generated when organic materials are burned or converted into biogas is balanced by the carbon taken in during the growth of the biomass feedstock, making it a carbon–neutral energy source. Therefore, biomass power plants are a desirable choice to minimize carbon emissions and combat climate change [99,100,101,102,103].
Humbert [104] and Lee [105] reported the statistical data on the Drax power station in the UK which is the finest example of a biomass power plant. One of the largest biomass power stations in the world, Drax, was formerly a coal-fired plant. Its main fuel source is wood pellets obtained from sustainably managed forests in the US and Canada. A big step forward for green energy, the renovation of Drax, has resulted in a significant drop in greenhouse gas emissions. The data show that as of 2020, Drax's biomass operations have reduced carbon emissions by 86% when compared to their prior coal-fired state, significantly advancing the UK's renewable energy targets. Shamsuddin [106] in his study, revealed the Malaysian strategies to capture carbon dioxide in the power plants which is shown below in the Table 3.
Energy-efficient technologies called Combined Heat and Power (CHP) systems concurrently produce heat and electricity from a single fuel source, providing the opportunity for optimal energy use by capturing waste heat for heating applications [107]. CHP systems have become a desirable choice for sustainable energy generation, waste reduction, and greenhouse gas emission reduction when biomass is integrated as the primary fuel source [108, 109]. The Växjö Biomass Gasification CHP plant in Sweden, which uses wood chips and forest leftovers to generate electricity and district heating through gasification, is an example of successful integration [110, 111]. Biomass CHP-powered district heating systems provide lower emissions and higher energy efficiencies. Denmark's decentralized biomass CHP systems serve as an example of how to effectively employ local biomass as feedstock while fostering local participation in sustainable energy practices and energy independence. Critical analyses are required to ensure effective biomass utilization and to optimize contributions to a greener and more sustainable energy sector [112,113,114].
The desire for sustainable and renewable energy sources has fueled major developments in biomass-to-bioenergy conversion technologies in recent years. The main developments in biomass-to-bioenergy technology are compiled in Table 4 [115].
5 Biofuels from biomass
Biofuels are renewable substitutes for fossil fuels made from biomass feedstocks, such as bioethanol and biodiesel. Biodiesel is created through the transesterification of vegetable or animal fats, and bioethanol is created through the fermentation of sugar, starch, or cellulose-rich feedstocks [116, 117].
Karimi et al. [118] gave a statistical overview of the production of bioethanol in the US, where corn is a common feedstock, and bioethanol production is demonstrated largely. The United States, one of the world's major producers of bioethanol, receives most of its renewable fuel from corn ethanol. Shaik et al. [119] reported that over 13.9 billion gallons of bioethanol were produced in the U.S. as of 2020, largely from corn. Replacing over 46% of the carbon dioxide emissions from gasoline in each gallon of corn-based ethanol considerably reduces greenhouse gas emissions [120]. A possible threat to food supplies and their effects on food prices has been raised by the use of food crops for biofuel production, such as maize [121].
Similarly, the manufacturing of biodiesel has become increasingly popular worldwide, especially when using feedstocks, such as soybean oil, rapeseed oil, and palm oil [122]. Kareem et al. [123] investigated canola oil for the production of biodiesel at a large scale. Safaripour [124] in one study, reported the potential of jojoba oil for biodiesel production. The European Union is one instance in which biodiesel production has increased significantly. The EU generated 12.2 million metric tons of biodiesel in 2020, mostly from vegetable oils. With a much smaller carbon footprint than regular diesel, biodiesel is a greener substitute. However, due to concerns about deforestation and biodiversity loss in areas where palm oil plantations are expanding, the use of palm oil as feedstock has been controversial.
Other biofuels, such as jet fuels and biogas, are being developed and commercialized, in addition to bioethanol and biodiesel. Bio-jet fuels made from biomass feedstock are being investigated to reduce the carbon footprint of the aviation industry. Anaerobic digestion of organic waste results in the creation of biogas, which predominantly consists of methane and can be utilized for transportation, heating, and energy generation. With a market share of over 20% for biogas by 2020, nations such as Sweden have made major progress in utilizing it in their transportation sector. Table 5 shows the applications of various types of biomass for biofuel generation.
Significant progress has been made in feedstock utilization and conversion processes in the field of biomass-to-biofuel technology as a result of continuous research and development activities. Recent developments in biomass-to-biofuel technologies are summarized in Table 6 [133].
6 Environmental and economic considerations
Compared with conventional fossil fuels, biomass energy can minimize greenhouse gas emissions, which is an important feature. Carbon dioxide (CO2) is released into the atmosphere when biomass is burned; however, the carbon released is a component of the natural carbon cycle. This implies that the carbon absorbed by plants during growth balances the carbon released during combustion. This procedure can be regarded as carbon neutral because it does not result in a net rise in atmospheric CO2 levels, provided that the biomass is obtained from sustainable sources. However, owing to concerns about deforestation, changes in land use, and unsustainable harvesting methods, the carbon neutrality of biomass energy is in question. Maintaining carbon neutrality requires sustainable sourcing and a balance between consumption and regeneration [134,135,136,137,138].
Although biomass energy lowers greenhouse gas emissions, it has environmental drawbacks. Particulate matter, nitrogen oxides, volatile organic compounds, and carbon monoxide are only a few pollutants released during combustion that affect air quality and human health [139]. Strict emission regulations, modern air pollution management technology such as electrostatic precipitators and scrubbers, and enhanced conversion technologies are some mitigation techniques [140]. Regular compliance checks and monitoring are essential to ensure that biomass power facilities follow all applicable environmental laws [141, 142].
Cost, cost structure, technological development, and government incentives all affect the economic viability of biomass energy [140]. In areas with abundant resources, it can be competitive, eliminating dependency on imported fossil fuels and giving money to biomass producers. However, the initial setup costs and infrastructure required for biomass collection and transportation can be significant, and the cost-effectiveness of biomass is affected by changes in the prices of other energy sources [143]. The cost of producing biomass energy is anticipated to decrease as technology advances, thereby increasing its long-term economic appeal [144]. In order to comprehend the economic dynamics of producing energy from biomass, a number of elements must be examined. The following figure highlights the essential components that determine the systems' economic viability and feasibility.
Furthermore, supportive laws and policies are essential to encourage the adoption of biomass energy and sustainable development. Governments can encourage biomass production and investment by providing financial aid, tax breaks, subsidies, feed-in tariffs, and renewable energy targets. Strong environmental laws are necessary to examine and reduce the effects of biomass energy generation. These rules should concentrate on sustainable sourcing, emission reduction, and land-use strategies that prevent deforestation and safeguard biodiversity. International collaboration and agreements make it easier for best practices to be shared, thus ensuring the ethical use of biomass energy worldwide. Policymakers should encourage the growth of biomass energy while positively impacting the energy mix and efforts to mitigate climate change by integrating environmental considerations and economic incentives.
7 Future prospects and research direction
Biomass has great potential to help generate renewable energy and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. However, to fully realize their potential, several issues must be resolved. The struggle for biomass resources between energy generation and other applications, such as agriculture and forestry, is a major hurdle. To prevent possible disputes, ensure food security, and maintain ecosystem health, it is essential to sustain the source and distribute biomass feedstocks. To address this difficulty, future initiatives should promote integrated biomass usage strategies that use agriculture and forestry leftovers for both energy production and soil enrichment. Additionally, it is crucial to invest in research to find and create abundant non-food lignocellulosic biomass sources that do not directly compete with food production.
Another crucial challenge is to boost the efficiency of biomass conversion procedures. There is still an opportunity for improvement in terms of energy generation, waste reduction, and process stability, even though technologies such as anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis have shown promise. To increase the overall effectiveness of biomass-to-energy conversion, more research is required to optimize the operating conditions, catalysts, and reactor design. Additionally, there are technological and logistical problems associated with integrating these processes into the current energy infrastructure, which necessitate careful planning and investment. Realizing the full potential of biomass applications for green energy requires the development of scalable and financially effective waste-to-energy systems.
8 Conclusion
This comprehensive review analyzes the use of biomass energy as a sustainable energy source and its possible utilities for the future. When harvested sustainably, biomass has enormous potential as a renewable energy source to lower greenhouse gas emissions. It is a workable option for lowering carbon footprints because of its adaptability to a range of industries, from power generation to transportation. Biomass is crucial for addressing climate change because it can be made carbon–neutral through sustainable land management. Enhancing the economic viability and competitiveness of biomass worldwide requires ongoing research, legislative support, and international cooperation. While there are still obstacles to overcome, biomass can be a key in creating a cleaner and more sustainable energy environment, along with other renewables. To realize its full potential and to open the door to a brighter, more eco-friendly future, coordinated efforts are required. To maximize the potential of biomass as a renewable energy source, it is essential to understand how these three factors interact. To maximize energy production while minimizing environmental problems, this review examines obstacles, ongoing research, and recent developments in effective biomass-based energy systems.
Data availability
Data will be made available on request.
References
Farghali M, et al. Strategies to save energy in the context of the energy crisis: a review. Environ Chem Lett. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-023-01591-5.
Ng KH, et al. Photocatalytic water splitting for solving energy crisis: myth, fact or busted? Chem Eng J. 2021;417:128847.
Hussain SA, et al. The perspective of energy poverty and 1st energy crisis of green transition. Energy. 2023;275:127487.
Gilbert A, Bazilian MD, Gross SJB. Report, December, The emerging global natural gas market and the energy crisis of 2021–2022. 2021. Foreign Policy, Brookings, 2021.
Goldthau A, Tagliapietra SJN. Energy crisis: five questions that must be answered in 2023. Nature. 2022;612(7941):627–30.
Kreps BH. The rising costs of fossil-fuel extraction: an energy crisis that will not go away. Am J Econ Sociol. 2020;79(3):695–717.
Ramos JL, et al. Addressing the energy crisis: using microbes to make biofuels. Microb Biotechnol. 2022;15:1026–30.
Mahesh A, Sandhu KS. A genetic algorithm based improved optimal sizing strategy for solar-wind-battery hybrid system using energy filter algorithm. Front Energy. 2020;14:139–51.
Chomać-Pierzecka E, Sobczak A, Soboń D. The potential and development of the geothermal energy market in Poland and the Baltic States—selected aspects. Energies. 2022;15(11):4142.
Atuguba RA, Tuokuu FXD, Science S. Ghana’s renewable energy agenda: legislative drafting in search of policy paralysis. Energy Res Soc Sci. 2020;64:101453.
Durrani AA, Khan IA, Ahmad MI. Analysis of electric power generation growth in Pakistan: falling into the vicious cycle of coal. Eng. 2021;2(3):296–311.
Shah SHA, et al. Assessing potential of dor river as small hydro project for lessening energy crisis and enhancing tarbela reservoir life in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Water. 2022;14(17):2683.
Sherwood J. The significance of biomass in a circular economy. Bioresour Technol. 2020;300:122755.
Niksa S. Predicting the macroscopic combustion characteristics of diverse forms of biomass in pp firing. Fuel. 2021;283:118911.
Adeleke AA, et al. Essential basics on biomass torrefaction, densification and utilization. Int J Energy Res. 2021;45(2):1375–95.
Hajinajaf N, et al. Practical strategies to improve harvestable biomass energy yield in microalgal culture: a review. Biomass Bioenergy. 2021;145:105941.
Odzijewicz JI, et al. Utilization of ashes from biomass combustion. Energies. 2022;15(24):9653.
Ighalo JO, et al. Flash pyrolysis of biomass: a review of recent advances. Clean Technol Environ Policy. 2022;24(8):2349–63.
Osman AI, et al. Conversion of biomass to biofuels and life cycle assessment: a review. Environ Chem Lett. 2021;19:4075–118.
Azeta O, et al. A review on the sustainable energy generation from the pyrolysis of coconut biomass. Sci Afr. 2021;13:e00909.
Ayele A, et al. Comparative utilization of dead and live fungal biomass for the removal of heavy metal: a concise review. Sci World J. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5588111.
Alper K, et al. Sustainable energy and fuels from biomass: a review focusing on hydrothermal biomass processing. Sustain Energy Fuels. 2020;4(9):4390–414.
Forsberg C, et al. Replacing liquid fossil fuels and hydrocarbon chemical feedstocks with liquid biofuels from large-scale nuclear biorefineries. Appl Energy. 2021;298:117225.
Sher F, et al. Development of biomass derived highly porous fast adsorbents for post-combustion CO2 capture. Fuel. 2020;282:118506.
Xie WH, et al. Biomass-based N-rich porous carbon materials for CO2 capture and in-situ conversion. Chemsuschem. 2022;15(18):e202201004.
Zhang Z, et al. Emerging trends in sustainable CO2-management materials. Adv Mater. 2022;34(29):2201547.
Goel C, Mohan S, Dinesha P. CO2 capture by adsorption on biomass-derived activated char: a review. Sci Total Environ. 2021;798:149296.
Udayan A, et al. Mass cultivation and harvesting of microalgal biomass: current trends and future perspectives. Bioresour Technol. 2022;344:126406.
Shah SAR, et al. Nexus of biomass energy, key determinants of economic development and environment: a fresh evidence from Asia. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2020;133:110244.
Wang C, et al. The social, economic, and environmental implications of biomass ethanol production in China: a multi-regional input-output-based hybrid LCA model. J Clean Prod. 2020;249:119326.
Sultana S, et al. Biofuel and bio-economy nexus. In: Bandh SA, Malla FA, editors., et al., Biofuels in circular economy. Singapore: Springer; 2023. p. 157–81.
Kobayashi T, Nakajima L. Sustainable development goals for advanced materials provided by industrial wastes and biomass sources. Curr Opin Green Sustain. 2021;28:100439.
Kumar Sarangi P, et al. Utilization of agricultural waste biomass and recycling toward circular bioeconomy. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2023;30(4):8526–39.
Dafiqurrohman H, et al. Gasification of rice wastes toward green and sustainable energy production: a review. J Clean Prod. 2022;366:132926.
Taghizadeh-Alisaraei A, et al. Potential of biofuels production from wheat straw biomass, current achievements and perspectives: a review. Biofuels. 2023;14(1):79–92.
Borowski PF. Management of energy enterprises in zero-emission conditions: bamboo as an innovative biomass for the production of green energy by power plants. Energies. 2022;15(5):1928.
Kumaniaev I, et al. Conversion of birch bark to biofuels. Green Chem. 2020;22(7):2255–63.
Ali M, et al. 16 - The use of crop residues for biofuel production. In: Verma D, et al., editors. Biomass, biopolymer-based materials, and bioenergy. Sawston: Woodhead Publishing; 2019. p. 369–95.
Mahari WAW, et al. Valorization of municipal wastes using co-pyrolysis for green energy production, energy security, and environmental sustainability: a review. Chem Eng J. 2021;421:129749.
Mills MP. Mines, minerals, and “green” energy: a reality check. 2020. https://media4.manhattaninstitute.org/sites/default/files/mines-minerals-green-energy-reality-checkMM.pdf.
Kaletnik G, et al. Potential of production of energy crops in Ukraine and their processing on solid biofuels. Ecol Eng Environ Technol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.12912/27197050/135447.
Stanton BJ, et al. The practice and economics of hybrid poplar biomass production for biofuels and bioproducts in the Pacific Northwest. BioEnergy Res. 2021;14:543–60.
Bhattacharjee A, et al. Rubber tree seed utilization for green energy, revenue generation and sustainable development–a comprehensive review. Ind Crops Prod. 2021;174:114186.
Saha JK, Dutta AJW, Valorization B. A review of graphene: material synthesis from biomass sources. Waste Biomass Valorization. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-021-01577-w.
Buffi M, et al. Energy and environmental assessment of hydrogen from biomass sources: challenges and perspectives. Biomass Bioenergy. 2022;165:106556.
Kokkinos K, Karayannis V, Moustakas K. Optimizing microalgal biomass feedstock selection for nanocatalytic conversion into biofuel clean energy, using fuzzy multi-criteria decision making processes. Front Energy Res. 2021;8:622210.
Sujith A, et al. Integrating nanomaterial and high-performance fuzzy-based machine learning approach for green energy conversion. Int J Food Nutr. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5793978.
AlNouss A, McKay G, Al-Ansari T. Enhancing waste to hydrogen production through biomass feedstock blending: a techno-economic-environmental evaluation. Appl Energy. 2020;266:114885.
Dhara FT, Fayshal MA. Waste sludge: entirely waste or a sustainable source of biocrude? A review. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-023-04846-7.
Akpahou R, Admas MM, Adaramola MS. Evaluation of a bioenergy resource of agricultural residues and municipal solid wastes in Benin. AIMS Energy. 2024;12(1):167.
Batista RM, et al. Tools for optimization of biomass-to-energy conversion processes. Processes. 2023;11(3):854.
Galán-Madruga D, et al. Influence of the products of biomass combustion processes on air quality and cancer risk assessment in rural environmental (Spain). Environ Geochem Health. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-021-01052-4.
Imran M, et al. Assessing green solutions for indoor and outdoor environmental quality: sustainable development needs renewable energy technology. Atmosphere. 2022;13(11):1904.
Osman AI. Mass spectrometry study of lignocellulosic biomass combustion and pyrolysis with NOx removal. Renew Energy. 2020;146:484–96.
Paes CE, et al. The power generation expansion planning in Brazil: considering the impact of greenhouse gas emissions in an investment decision model. Renew Energy. 2022;184:225–38.
Fayyazbakhsh A, et al. Engine emissions with air pollutants and greenhouse gases and their control technologies. J Clean Prod. 2022;376:134260.
Marangwanda GT, Madyira DM, Babarinde TO. Combustion models for biomass: a review. Energy Rep. 2020;6:664–72.
Mortari D, et al. The influence of water-soluble inorganic matter on combustion of grape pomace and its chars produced by slow and fast pyrolysis. Fuel. 2021;284:118880.
Hu B, et al. The oxalic acid-assisted fast pyrolysis of biomass for the sustainable production of furfural. Fuel. 2022;322:124279.
Wu L, et al. Low energy consumption and high quality bio-fuels production via in-situ fast pyrolysis of reed straw by adding metallic particles in an induction heating reactor. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2022;47(9):5828–41.
Tan H, et al. A review on the comparison between slow pyrolysis and fast pyrolysis on the quality of lignocellulosic and lignin-based biochar. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1051/1/012075.
Das S, Goud VVJE. RSM-optimised slow pyrolysis of rice husk for bio-oil production and its upgradation. Energy. 2021;225:120161.
Amrullah A, et al. Slow pyrolysis of Ulva lactuca (Chlorophyta) for sustainable production of bio-oil and biochar. Sustainability. 2022;14(6):3233.
Premchand P, et al. Biochar production from slow pyrolysis of biomass under CO2 atmosphere: a review on the effect of CO2 medium on biochar production, characterisation, and environmental applications. J Environ Chem Eng. 2023;11:110009.
Rego F, et al. Investigation of the role of feedstock properties and process conditions on the slow pyrolysis of biomass in a continuous auger reactor. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 2022;161:105378.
Wang L, et al. Comparison of properties of biochar produced from different types of lignocellulosic biomass by slow pyrolysis at 600 C. Appl Energy Combust Sci. 2022;12:100090.
Li P, et al. Synergistic enhancement of bio-oil quality through hydrochloric or acetic acid-washing pretreatment and catalytic fast pyrolysis of biomass. Ind Crops Prod. 2022;187:115474.
Dada TK, et al. A review on catalytic pyrolysis for high-quality bio-oil production from biomass. Biomass Convers Biorefin. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01391-3.
Liu R, et al. A review on the catalytic pyrolysis of biomass for the bio-oil production with ZSM-5: focus on structure. Fuel Process Technol. 2020;199:106301.
Ren X, et al. Challenges and opportunities in microwave-assisted catalytic pyrolysis of biomass: a review. Appl Energy. 2022;315:118970.
Potnuri R, et al. Effect of dry torrefaction pretreatment of the microwave-assisted catalytic pyrolysis of biomass using the machine learning approach. Renew Energy. 2022;197:798–809.
Qiu B, et al. Research progress in the preparation of high-quality liquid fuels and chemicals by catalytic pyrolysis of biomass: a review. Energy Convers Manag. 2022;261:115647.
Wang J, et al. Catalytic pyrolysis of biomass with Ni/Fe-CaO-based catalysts for hydrogen-rich gas: DFT and experimental study. Energy Convers Manag. 2022;254:115246.
Faizan M, Song H. Critical review on catalytic biomass gasification: state-of-Art progress, technical challenges, and perspectives in future development. J Clean Prod. 2023;408:137224.
Martins AH, Rouboa A, Monteiro E. On the green hydrogen production through gasification processes: a techno-economic approach. J Clean Prod. 2023;383:135476.
Tezer Ö, et al. Biomass gasification for sustainable energy production: a review. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2022;47(34):15419–33.
Wang C, et al. A two-stage circulated fluidized bed process to minimize tar generation of biomass gasification for fuel gas production. Appl Energy. 2022;323:119639.
Akbarian A, et al. Challenges and opportunities of lignocellulosic biomass gasification in the path of circular bioeconomy. Bioresour Technol. 2022;362:127774.
Martins AH. Biomass gasification as a way of producing green hydrogen: modelling and simulation in Aspen Plus®. 2022.
Varjani S, et al. Breakthrough in hydrolysis of waste biomass by physico-chemical pretreatment processes for efficient anaerobic digestion. Chemosphere. 2022;294:133617.
Haldar D, et al. Purification of biogas for methane enrichment using biomass-based adsorbents: a review. Biomass Bioenergy. 2023;173:106804.
Sempere F, et al. Anoxic desulphurisation of biogas from full-scale anaerobic digesters in suspended biomass bioreactors valorising previously nitrified digestate centrate. J Hazard Mater. 2022;439:129641.
Heidari S, et al. Biogas production and processing from various organic wastes in anaerobic digesters and landfills. In: Pirzadah TB, Malik B, Bhat RA, Hakeem KR, editors., et al., Bioresource technology: concept, tools and experiences. Hoboken: Wiley; 2022. p. 310–31.
Oduor WW, et al. Enhancement of anaerobic digestion by co-digesting food waste and water hyacinth in improving treatment of organic waste and bio-methane recovery. Heliyon. 2022;8(9):e10580.
Mishra A, Kumar M, Bolan NS, Kapley A, Kumar R, Singh L. Multidimensional approaches of biogas production and up-gradation: opportunities and challenges. Bioresource Technology. 2021;338:125514.
Vögeli Y. Anaerobic digestion of biowaste in developing countries: practical information and case studies. Dübendorf: Eawag-Sandec; 2014.
Aworanti OA, et al. Decoding anaerobic digestion: a holistic analysis of biomass waste technology, process kinetics, and operational variables. Energies. 2023;16(8):3378.
Yang X, et al. Effects of torrefaction pretreatment on fuel quality and combustion characteristics of biomass: a review. Fuel. 2024;358:130314.
Schneider T, et al. A review of thermochemical biomass conversion combined with Stirling engines for the small-scale cogeneration of heat and power. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2020;134:110288.
Schicker PC, Spayde D, Cho H. Design and feasibility study of biomass-driven combined heat and power systems for rural communities. J Energy Resour Technol. 2022;144(7):070909.
Bagherian MA, et al. Analyzing utilization of biomass in combined heat and power and combined cooling, heating, and power systems. Processes. 2021;9(6):1002.
Zhu Y, et al. Thermodynamic analysis and economic assessment of biomass-fired organic Rankine cycle combined heat and power system integrated with CO2 capture. Energy Convers Manag. 2020;204:112310.
Zamri MFMA, et al. An overview of palm oil biomass for power generation sector decarbonization in Malaysia: progress, challenges, and prospects. Energy Environ. 2022;11(4):e437.
Johansen K, Werner S. Something is sustainable in the state of Denmark: a review of the Danish district heating sector. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2022;158:112117.
Behzadi A, Arabkoohsar A, Perić VS. Innovative hybrid solar-waste designs for cogeneration of heat and power, an effort for achieving maximum efficiency and renewable integration. Appl Therm Eng. 2021;190:116824.
Alves M, Segurado R, Costa MJE. On the road to 100% renewable energy systems in isolated islands. Energy. 2020;198:117321.
Jåstad EO, et al. Integration of forest and energy sector models–new insights in the bioenergy markets. Energy Convers Manag. 2021;227:113626.
Barker A, Blake H, D’Arcangelo FM, Lenain P. Towards net zero emissions in Denmark. 2022.
Ilari A, et al. Carbon footprint and feedstock quality of a real biomass power plant fed with forestry and agricultural residues. Resources. 2022;11(2):7.
Zhao B, et al. Location mapping for constructing biomass power plant using multi-criteria decision-making method. Sustain Energy Technol Assess. 2022;49:101707.
Guo H, Cui J, Li J. Biomass power generation in China: status, policies and recommendations. Energy Rep. 2022;8:687–96.
Burulday ME, Mert MS, Javani N. Thermodynamic analysis of a parabolic trough solar power plant integrated with a biomass-based hydrogen production system. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2022;47(45):19481–501.
Primadita D, et al. A review on biomass for electricity generation in Indonesia. J Electr Electron Inform. 2020;4(1):4.
Pierrehumbert R. Plant power: Burning biomass instead of coal can help fight climate change—but only if done right. Bull At Sci. 2022;78(3):125–7.
Yang C, et al. Role of biomass as low-carbon energy source in the era of net zero emissions. Fuel. 2022;328:125206.
Shamsuddin AH. Development of renewable energy in Malaysia-strategic initiatives for carbon reduction in the power generation sector. Proc Eng. 2012;49:384–91.
Lashgari F, et al. Comprehensive analysis of a novel integration of a biomass-driven combined heat and power plant with a compressed air energy storage (CAES). Energy Convers Manag. 2022;255:115333.
Algieri A, Morrone P. Thermo-economic investigation of solar-biomass hybrid cogeneration systems based on small-scale transcritical organic Rankine cycles. Appl Therm Eng. 2022;210:118312.
Beiron J, Normann F, Johnsson F. A techno-economic assessment of CO2 capture in biomass and waste-fired combined heat and power plants–a Swedish case study. Int J Greenh Gas Control. 2022;118:103684.
Ahmed S, Nguyen TJSE. Analysis of future carbon-neutral energy system–the case of Växjö Municipality, Sweden. Smart Energy. 2022;7:100082.
Gustavsson L, Piccardo C. Cost optimized building energy retrofit measures and primary energy savings under different retrofitting materials, economic scenarios, and energy supply. Energies. 2022;15(3):1009.
Zheng Y, et al. Carbon footprint analysis for biomass-fueled combined heat and power station: a case study. Agriculture. 2022;12(8):1146.
Jensen AR, et al. Demonstration of a concentrated solar power and biomass plant for combined heat and power. Energy Convers Manag. 2022;271:116207.
Lund H, et al. Smart energy Denmark. A consistent and detailed strategy for a fully decarbonized society. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2022;168:112777.
Obileke K, Makaka G, Nwokolo N. Recent advancements in anaerobic digestion and gasification technology. Appl Sci. 2023;13(9):5597.
Ahmed SF, et al. Utilization of nanomaterials in accelerating the production process of sustainable biofuels. Sustain Energy Technol Assess. 2023;55:102894.
Maity S, Mallick N. Trends and advances in sustainable bioethanol production by marine microalgae: a critical review. J Clean Prod. 2022;345:131153.
Aghaei S, et al. A comprehensive review on bioethanol production from corn stover: worldwide potential, environmental importance, and perspectives. Biomass Bioenergy. 2022;161:106447.
Alalyani SRS, et al. Modeling and optimization of bioethanol production yield from corn starch using response surface methodology. Environ Dev Sustain. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-02990-y.
Ma Z, et al. Microalgae-based biotechnological sequestration of carbon dioxide for net zero emissions. Trends Biotechnol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2022.09.002.
Yogeeswari S, Loganathan N, Hassan AAG. Biofuels in environmental security, in environmental sustainability of biofuels. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2023.
Yahya M, et al. Dependence structure between the international crude oil market and the European markets of biodiesel and rapeseed oil. Renew Energy. 2022;197:594–605.
Abdulkareem AN, Nasir NF. Biodiesel production from canola oil using TiO2CaO as a heterogenous catalyst. J Adv Res Fluid Mech Therm Sci. 2022;93(2):125–37.
Safaripour M, et al. Ex-situ biodiesel production from Simmondsia chinensis (Jojoba) biomass: process evaluation and optimization. J Ind Eng Chem. 2023;124:392–401.
Neupane DJB. Biofuels from renewable sources, a potential option for biodiesel production. Bioengineering. 2022;10(1):29.
Abu-Ghazala AH, et al. Valorization of hazard waste: efficient utilization of white brick waste powder in the catalytic production of biodiesel from waste cooking oil via RSM optimization process. Renew Energy. 2022;200:1120–33.
Dutta N, et al. Methods to convert lignocellulosic waste into biohydrogen, biogas, bioethanol, biodiesel and value-added chemicals: a review. Environ Chem Lett. 2023;21(2):803–20.
Isler-Kaya A, Karaosmanoglu F. Life cycle assessment of safflower and sugar beet molasses-based biofuels. Renew Energy. 2022;201:1127–38.
Tanaka T, Guo J, Wang X. Price interconnection of fuel and food markets: evidence from biodiesel in the United States. GCB Bioenergy. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.13055.
Costa MW, Oliveira AA. Social life cycle assessment of feedstocks for biodiesel production in Brazil. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2022;159:112166.
Roy DK, Abedin MZJH. Potentiality of biodiesel and bioethanol production from feedstock in Bangladesh: a review. Heliyon. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11213.
Nagula K, et al. Biofuels and bioproducts from seaweeds. In: Tuli D, Kasture S, Kuila A, editors., et al., Advanced biofuel technologies. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2022. p. 431–55.
Sarangi PK, Nanda S, Mohanty P. Recent advancements in biofuels and bioenergy utilization. Berlin: Springer; 2018.
Saravanakumar A, et al. Thermochemical conversion of large-size woody biomass for carbon neutrality: principles, applications, and issues. Bioresour Technol. 2022;370:128562.
Srivastava RK, et al. Biomass utilization and production of biofuels from carbon neutral materials. Environ Pollut. 2021;276:116731.
Ozoliņa SA, et al. Can energy sector reach carbon neutrality with biomass limitations? Energy. 2022;249:123797.
Ahamer GJE. Why biomass fuels are principally not carbon neutral. Energies. 2022;15(24):9619.
Li X, et al. Decarbonization in complex energy systems: a study on the feasibility of carbon neutrality for Switzerland in 2050. Front Energy. 2020;8:549615.
Sri Shalini S, et al. Biochar from biomass waste as a renewable carbon material for climate change mitigation in reducing greenhouse gas emissions—a review. Biomass Convers Biorefin. 2021;11:2247–67.
Babu S, et al. Exploring agricultural waste biomass for energy, food and feed production and pollution mitigation: a review. Bioresour Technol. 2022;360:127566.
Kang Y, et al. Bioenergy in China: evaluation of domestic biomass resources and the associated greenhouse gas mitigation potentials. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2020;127:109842.
Hui DJAS. Effects of biochar application on soil properties, plant biomass production, and soil greenhouse gas emissions: A mini-review. Agric Sci. 2021;12(03):213.
Hariz HB, et al. Succinic acid production from oil palm biomass: a prospective plastic pollution solution. Fermentation. 2023;9(1):46.
Adegoke KA, et al. Sawdust-biomass based materials for sequestration of organic and inorganic pollutants and potential for engineering applications. Curr Res Green Sustain Chem. 2022;5:100274.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Farhad Ali conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, resources, software, visualization, writing—original draft, writing—review editing. Asadullah Dawood conceptualization, data curation, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, validation, visualization, writing—review editing. Akbar Hussain conceptualization, data curation, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, validation, visualization, writing—review editing. M Hisham Alnasir data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, validation, visualization, writing—review editing. Muhammad Asad Khan formal analysis, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, resources, validation, visualization, writing—review editing. Tehmeena Maryum Butt formal analysis, investigation, resources, validation, visualization, writing—review editing. Naveed Kausar Janjua conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, validation, visualization, writing—review editing. Anum Hamid conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, validation, visualization, writing—review editing.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ali, F., Dawood, A., Hussain, A. et al. Fueling the future: biomass applications for green and sustainable energy. Discov Sustain 5, 156 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00309-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00309-z