Abstract
Background
Scaphoid nonunion often requires surgical management involving the combination of a bone graft and internal fixation to restore the carpal alignment and length. While traditionally, the scaphoid waist nonunions have been treated with open bone grafts, with the advent of arthroscopy, bone graft reconstruction can now be carried out as an arthroscopic assisted minimally invasive procedure. We aimed to compare outcomes between open and arthroscopic bone grafting in the treatment of scaphoid nonunion.
Methods
A review protocol was established according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. PubMed/Medline, Cochrane, Embase, and Google Scholar were searched for articles on open and arthroscopic bone grafting for scaphoid nonunion with a minimum 12 month follow-up. The primary outcome was union rates in the two techniques. Secondary outcomes were changes in pain scores, complications, functional outcomes using different scoring systems, grip strength, range of motion at the wrist, and radiological parameters for restoring normal carpal alignment.
Results
Forty studies reporting on 1534 wrists were included (1152 open, 382 arthroscopic). The union rate was 93.4% and 93.2% with open and arthroscopic techniques, respectively. The functional scores were comparable between the two techniques. All patients had a reduction in their pain scores. The radiological outcome parameters were not reported by any of the studies in the arthroscopic group.
Conclusion
While bone grafting with both open and arthroscopic techniques for scaphoid nonunion showed comparable union rates and functional scores, further research is needed to assess the radiological outcomes of the arthroscopic technique.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Scaphoid nonunion often requires surgical management involving the combination of bone graft and internal fixation to restore carpal alignment and length [1]. Untreated scaphoid nonunion may progress to carpal instability and subsequent degenerative changes in the wrist [2]. Restoring normal carpal kinematics is paramount in preventing this progression [3].
Various techniques for graft reconstruction of scaphoid nonunion have been described. Traditionally, the scaphoid waist nonunions have been treated with nonvascularised bone grafts harvested from the iliac crest, distal radius, or the olecranon; vascularised bone grafts are preferred for proximal pole nonunion or after a failed procedure for the waist nonunion [4]. All these procedures were described as open techniques. However, with the advent of arthroscopy, bone graft reconstruction can now be carried out as an arthroscopic-assisted minimally invasive procedure [5]. As is the trend elsewhere in the body, there has been a shift in treatment approach from the conventional open technique to the arthroscopic assisted method, with the purported advantages of the latter being potentially less invasive and faster time to the bony union because of minimal trauma to the ligament structures, joint capsule, and the tenuous blood supply [6, 7]. Compromise of scaphoid vascularity, destabilisation of the ligament attachments, and postoperative stiffness are the reported disadvantages of open surgery [5]. While arthroscopic wrist surgery appears promising, it involves a steep learning curve, longer operative time, and the need for specialized training and equipment [8]. Secondly, the degree of carpal alignment restoration may be inadequate with arthroscopic bone grafting, although the clinical outcomes may be acceptable [9].
This systematic review aimed to find if arthroscopic bone grafting gives a better union rate and functional outcome than open bone grafting in the treatment of scaphoid nonunion.
Methods
The systematic review was registered with PROSPERO, International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42023399012) [10] and was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and recommendations [11]. We included all types of studies—randomised controlled trials, comparative observational studies, cohort, and case series of either arthroscopic and/ or open technique published in the English literature, not restricted to a specific date. We excluded cadaveric and biomechanical studies. The references of the included papers were also reviewed to ensure that no relevant studies were missed. Where a report of an earlier study existed, the most recent published paper was retrieved.
Types of Study Included
Inclusion Criteria
-
1.
Studies in which adult patient cohorts suffered scaphoid nonunion.
-
2.
Available in English literature
-
3.
Randomised controlled trials, comparative observational studies, cohort, and case series of either arthroscopic and/ or open technique
-
4.
Reporting data for union rate
-
5.
Reporting patient-reported outcome
-
6.
Follow-up of at least 12 months or longer
Exclusion Criteria
-
1.
Non-English language literature
-
2.
Conference presentations, methodology studies, reviews, case reports, and expert opinions
Intervention
All studies testing arthroscopic treatments for scaphoid nonunion with osseous fixation and bone grafting through an arthroscopic approach.
Comparator
All studies testing open treatments for scaphoid nonunion using osseous fixation and bone grafting.
Literature Search
We performed electronic searches using Medline, Cochrane Library Databases, Embase, and Google Scholar in August 2023. Medline search string was ((((((((scaphoid nonunion[Title/Abstract]) AND (bone grafting[Title/Abstract])) AND (outcome[Title/Abstract])) NOT (vascularised[Title/Abstract])) NOT (cadaveric[Title/Abstract])) NOT (biomechanical study[Title/Abstract])) NOT (vascularized[Title/Abstract])) NOT (ring fixator[Title/Abstract])) NOT (skeletally immature[Title/Abstract]). Cochrane search strings were ‘Population “Fracture Of Scaphoid Bone Of Wrist” AND “Nonunion Of Fracture” AND Intervention “Autogenous Bone Graft” AND Comparison (“Arthroscopic Procedure” OR “Open Surgical Procedure”) AND Outcome “Clinical Outcome”’; and ‘Population “Fracture Of Scaphoid Bone Of Wrist” AND “Nonunion Of Fracture” AND Outcome “Time To Bone Union” AND “Clinical Function” AND Intervention “Arthroscopic Procedure” OR Comparison “Open Surgical Procedure”’. EMBASE search string was (Scaphoid AND Nonunion OR Scaphoid nonunion) AND ((Arthroscopic) OR (Open) Bone grafting) AND (Outcome) OR (Result). Google Scholar search string was ‘Arthroscopic|Arthroscopic Surgical Procedure|Surgery, Arthroscopic|open bone grafting|Grafting, Bone|Transplantation, Bone Scaphoid Nonunion|ununited fracture|fracture, ununited result|outcome’.
Study Selection
Titles and abstracts were screened for eligibility by two reviewers (JAS and PA) before proceeding to the full text: inconsistencies between reviewers were resolved by discussion based on full-text articles.
Data Extraction
All saved search records were downloaded into Rayyan (https://rayyan.ai/) [12] for cataloguing decisions on inclusion and exclusion and then transferred to a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet for data extraction, which included study details like article title, author(s), year of publication, journal, country of origin, study type, level of evidence, number of participants recruited and evaluated, study design, location of nonunion, characteristics of the intervention—arthroscopic or open, graft source, fixation method, time to follow-up, loss to follow-up, outcome, union rate, visual analogue score (VAS) for pain—preoperative and at follow-up, functional score—preoperative and at follow-up, any complications, grip strength—preoperative and at follow-up, pinch strength—preoperative and at follow-up, range of movement—preoperative and at follow-up, radiographic parameter, failure, disabilities of arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score—preoperative and at follow-up.
Methodological Quality
All the included studies were assessed for quality and rigour against the methodological index for nonrandomised studies (MINORS) [13], and a global score was assigned to each. The MINORS score is a summation of individual item scores (zero to two for each item), with a maximum of 24 for comparative studies and 16 for noncomparative studies.
Data Analysis
Descriptive statistics were used to present quantitative data. Primary outcome measures were union rates in the two methods. Secondary outcome measures were changes in pain scores, complications, functional outcomes using different scoring systems, grip strength, range of motion at the wrist, and radiological parameters for restoring normal carpal alignment.
Results
Medline search returned 27 articles, Cochrane database returned 0 articles, EMBASE search returned 75 studies, and Google Scholar search returned 588 articles. The search results were imported into Rayyan, and the inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. After applying the selection criteria and searching the included studies’ references, 40 studies were shortlisted for the review (Fig. 1). All the included studies were published between 1991 and 2023.
Twenty-five studies reported the outcome of open bone grafting, 14 reported the outcome of arthroscopic bone grafting, and one was a comparative study of arthroscopic versus open bone grafting. One thousand one hundred fifty-two patients were treated with open bone grafting, while 382 were treated with arthroscopic bone grafting.
Quality Assessment
All studies included clear aims and outcomes, but the design was prospective in just around 15% of the studies. The MINORS scores can be seen in Table 1.
Clinical Effectiveness
The union rate was 93.4% (1076/1152) with the open bone grafting technique and 93.2% (352/382) with the arthroscopic bone grafting technique. Twelve studies in the open group reported preoperative functional scores, whereas 22 reported functional scores in the follow-up. Ten studies in the arthroscopic group reported preoperative functional scores, whereas 12 reported functional scores at follow-up. Fourteen studies in the open group reported preoperative grip strength, whereas 23 studies reported grip strength at follow-up. In the arthroscopic group, 10 studies reported preoperative grip strength and 12 studies reported grip strength at follow-up. Only three studies, all in the open group, reported on pinch strength. In the open group, 15 studies reported preoperative range of motion, whereas 23 reported range of motion at follow-up. In the arthroscopic group, 10 studies reported on the preoperative range of motion, whereas 13 studies reported the range of motion at follow-up. Among the open bone grafting studies, 9 studies reported preoperative functional results; modified Mayo wrist score (MMWS) was reported in 5 studies (average 46), and patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) in 4 studies (average 47). Functional score at follow-up was reported in 21 studies; scaphoid outcome score in one (12 excellent, 13 good, 6 fair, and 5 poor), Cooney wrist score in 5 (good to excellent in most studies), MMWS in 10 (average 84), PRWE score in 4 (average 22). One study did not mention the scoring system used. Fourteen studies reported preoperative grip strength, and 10 reported grip strength in percentage, an average of 64% of the uninjured hand. Twenty-three studies reported grip strength at follow-up, an average of 89% of the uninjured hand. Five studies reported preoperative disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) or QuickDASH score (average 47), and 10 studies reported DASH or QuickDASH at follow-up (average 17).
In the arthroscopic group, 9 studies reported preoperative MMWS (average 58). Among these, 2 studies also reported PRWE (average 36). 12 studies reported functional assessment at follow-up; MMWS in 11 studies (average 87), and four studies reported PRWE (average 7.1). Eleven studies in the open group reported preoperative pain scores, whereas 18 studies reported pain during follow-up.
All studies reported a reduction in pain score except one, which reported severe pain in 2 patients at follow-up [20]. Twelve studies in the arthroscopic group reported preoperative and follow-up pain scores. All patients had a reduction in their pain scores. The pre- and post-operative functional scores, grip strength, VAS score for pain and range of motion for all the included studies are shown in Table 2.
Sixteen studies in the open group reported complications, including three at the donor site. In contrast, only one study reported complications, which were transient neuropraxia of the superficial radial nerve and pin irritation.
Twenty studies reported radiographic parameters in the open group, whereas none of the studies in the arthroscopic group reported on radiographic parameters (Table 3).
Only studies with a minimum of 12 months postoperative follow-up were included. In the open group, follow-up ranged from 12 to 384 months; three studies reported nine patients lost to follow-up, while two studies did not report on this. In the arthroscopic group, follow-up ranged from 12 to 120 months; two studies reported five patients who were lost to follow-up, while one did not report on this.
Bone graft was most frequently harvested from the iliac crest, followed by the distal radius in both techniques. Bone graft from the olecranon, with or without iliac crest, was used in one case series in each technique. A comparison of fixation techniques could not be performed owing to the wide variability in the implants used (Kirschner wires, screws, plates, and biodegradable implants) and their combinations.
Discussion
When comparing the studies reporting open bone grafting with those reporting arthroscopic bone grafting, we found no significant difference in the union rates and clinical outcomes. The open and arthroscopic bone grafting techniques for scaphoid nonunion resulted in high union rates and comparable functional results.
The studies included in this review were a heterogeneous group, with the majority being retrospective without any uniformity regarding the location of nonunion, choice of bone graft or implant. Comparison of outcomes based on the location of nonunion was not feasible due to the limited information reported in most of the included studies. The definition for inclusion of patients regarding the duration since injury was not uniform across the studies in both groups, with patients included as early as 8 weeks after injury to 6 months after injury. However, all patients had a postoperative follow-up of at least 12 months.
Patients treated with the open bone grafting were almost three times those treated with the arthroscopic technique. The studies of open bone grafting, which included 1152 patients, were published between 1991 and 2023, while the studies of arthroscopic bone grafting, which included 382 patients, were published between 2016 and 2023. It is expected that these numbers will see a dramatic change as surgeons pursue arthroscopic surgical techniques in the treatment of wrist disorders increasingly and more studies of arthroscopic bone grafting are published.
With the inclusion of observational studies, which were the main study type available on this topic, the strengths and weaknesses of this systematic review are not unique and are subject to confounding factors and bias. There is a need to conduct well-designed multi-centre randomised controlled trials with rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria with the use of uniform radiological and functional outcome assessment on this topic to determine the superiority of one technique over the other, if any.
Conclusion
We systematically reviewed the available literature for evidence of better union rate and functional outcome with arthroscopic bone grafting compared to the open technique for scaphoid nonunion at a minimum of 1-year postoperative follow-up. Bone grafting with both open and arthroscopic techniques for scaphoid nonunion showed comparable union rates and functional scores. However, the radiological outcome parameters were not reported by any of the studies in the arthroscopic group.
Data availability
All the relevant data related to the study are presented in the tables.
References
Zhang, X., Wang, L., Ma, X., Wang, F., Duan, W., & Shao, X. (2022). Cannulated compression screw with versus without two K-wire fixation for treatment of scaphoid waist fracture nonunion. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 17(1), 78. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-02975-z
Kawamura, K., & Chung, K. C. (2008). Treatment of scaphoid fractures and nonunions. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 33(6), 988–997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.04.026
Oh, W., Kang, H., Chun, Y., Koh, I., Lee, Y., & Choi, Y. (2018). Retrospective comparative outcomes analysis of arthroscopic versus open bone graft and fixation for unstable scaphoid nonunions. Arthroscopy, 34(10), 2810–2818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2018.04.024
Steinmann, S., & Adams, J. (2006). Scaphoid fractures and nonunions: Diagnosis and treatment. The Journal of Orthopaedic Science, 11(4), 424–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-006-1025-x
Lamon, B., Ardouin, L., Bellemère, P., Dautel, G., & Athlani, L. (2021). Arthroscopic bone grafting for scaphoid nonunion: A retrospective study of 42 cases. The Journal of Hand Surgery (Asian-Pacific Volume), 26(4), 545–554. https://doi.org/10.1142/S242483552150051X
Goyal, T., Sankineani, S. R., & Tripathy, S. K. (2013). Local distal radius bone graft versus iliac crest bone graft for scaphoid nonunion: A comparative study. Musculoskeletal Surgery, 97(2), 109–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-012-0219-y
Slade, J. F., Geissler, W. B., Gutow, A. P., & Merrell, G. A. (2003). Percutaneous internal fixation of selected scaphoid nonunions with an arthroscopically assisted dorsal approach. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume, 85, 20–32. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200300004-00003
Shi, H., Lu, P., Yu, D., Wang, J., Wang, Z., Zhuang, B., et al. (2022). The training of wrist arthroscopy. Frontiers in Medicine, 9, 947459. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.947459
Basso, M. A., Smeraglia, F., Ocampos-Hernandez, M., Balato, G., Bernasconi, A., & Corella-Montoya, F. (2023). Scaphoid fracture non-union: A systematic review of the arthroscopic management. Acta Biomedica, 94(5), e2023194. https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v94i5.14646
Santoshi J. A., Behera P., & Rangasamy K. (2024). A systematic review of arthroscopic versus open bone grafting for scaphoid nonunion. PROSPERO 2023 CRD42023399012. Retrieved May 10, 2024, from https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023399012
PRISMA statement. (2024). Retrieved May 10, 2024, from https://www.prisma-statement.org
Ouzzani, M., Hammady, H., Fedorowicz, Z., & Elmagarmid, A. (2016). Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
Slim, K., Nini, E., Forestier, D., Kwiatkowski, F., Panis, Y., & Chipponi, J. (2003). Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): Development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ Journal of Surgery, 73(9), 712–716. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02748.x
Van Duyvenbode, J. H., Keijser, L. C., Hauet, E. J., Obermann, W. R., & Rozing, P. M. (1991). Pseudarthrosis of the scaphoid treated by the Matti-Russe operation. A long-term review of 77 cases. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery British Volume, 73(4), 603–606. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.73B4.2071643
Nakamura, R., Horii, E., Watanabe, K., Tsunoda, K., & Miura, T. (1993). Scaphoid non-union: Factors affecting the functional outcome of open reduction and wedge grafting with Herbert screw fixation. Journal of Hand Surgery (Edinburgh, Scotland), 18(2), 219–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-7681(93)90114-u
Inoue, G., Shionoya, K., & Kuwahata, Y. (1997). Herbert screw fixation for scaphoid nonunions. An analysis of factors influencing outcome. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 343, 99–106.
Beris, A. E., Soucacos, P. N., Xenakis, T., Malizos, K., Mitsionis, G., Varitimidis, S., et al. (1997). Scaphoid nonunion treated with bone graft and Herbert screw. 23 of 28 fractures healed. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum, 275, 60–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.1997.11744747
Chen, C. Y., Chao, E. K., Lee, S. S., & Ueng, S. W. (1999). Osteosynthesis of carpal scaphoid nonunion with interpositional bone graft and Kirschner wires: A 3- to 6-year follow-up. The Journal of Trauma, 47(3), 558–563. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199909000-00024
Takami, H., Takahashi, S., & Ando, M. (2000). Scaphoid nonunion treated by open reduction, anterior inlay bone grafting, and Kirschner-wire fixation. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 120(3–4), 134–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/pl00013760
Eggli, S., Fernandez, D. L., & Beck, T. (2002). Unstable scaphoid fracture nonunion: A medium-term study of anterior wedge grafting procedures. Journal of Hand Surgery (Edinburgh, Scotland), 27(1), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.1054/jhsb.2001.0651
Akmaz, I., Kiral, A., Pehlivan, O., Mahirogullari, M., Solakoglu, C., & Rodop, O. (2004). Biodegradable implants in the treatment of scaphoid nonunions. International Orthopaedics, 28(5), 261–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-004-0580-z
Murase, T., Moritomo, H., Goto, A., Sugamoto, K., & Yoshikawa, H. (2005). Does three-dimensional computer simulation improve results of scaphoid nonunion surgery? Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 434, 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000154204.72825.a5
Finsen, V., Hofstad, M., & Haugan, H. (2006). Most scaphoid non-unions heal with bone chip grafting and Kirschner-wire fixation. Thirty-nine patients reviewed 10 years after operation. Injury, 37(9), 854–859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.120
Huang, Y. C., Liu, Y., & Chen, T. H. (2009). Long-term results of scaphoid nonunion treated by intercalated bone grafting and Herbert’s screw fixation–a study of 49 patients for at least five years. International Orthopaedics, 33(5), 1295–1300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-008-0663-3
Zoubos, A. B., Triantafyllopoulos, I. K., Babis, G. C., & Soucacos, P. N. (2011). A modified Matti-Russe technique for the treatment of scaphoid waist non-union and pseudarthrosis. Medical Science Monitor: International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research. https://doi.org/10.12659/msm.881376
Watanabe, K. (2011). Analysis of carpal malalignment caused by scaphoid nonunion and evaluation of corrective bone graft on carpal alignment. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 36(1), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.10.011
Reigstad, O., Thorkildsen, R., Grimsgaard, C., Reigstad, A., & Røkkum, M. (2010). Healing of ununited scaphoid fractures by Kirschner wires and autologous structural bone grafts. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery, 44(2), 106–111. https://doi.org/10.3109/02844310903528663
Euler, S., Erhart, S., Deml, C., Kastenberger, T., Gabl, M., & Arora, R. (2014). The effect of delayed treatment on clinical and radiological effects of anterior wedge grafting for non-union of scaphoid fractures. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 134(7), 1023–1030. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-014-2007-7
Allon, R., Kramer, A., & Wollstein, R. (2016). Intramedullary screw and kirschner wire fixation for unstable scaphoid nonunion. Journal of Hand and Microsurgery, 8(3), 150–154. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1597550
Mani, K. C. K., & Acharya, P. (2018). Scaphoid nonunion: Does open reduction, bone grafting and Herbert screw fixation justify the treatment? International Orthopaedics, 42(5), 1099–1106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3590-3
Putnam, J. G., Mitchell, S. M., DiGiovanni, R. M., Stockwell, E. L., & Edwards, S. G. (2019). Outcomes of unstable scaphoid nonunion with segmental defect treated with plate fixation and autogenous cancellous graft. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 44(2), 160.e1-160.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.05.023
Schormans, P. M. J., Kooijman, M. A., Ten Bosch, J. A., Poeze, M., & Hannemann, P. F. W. (2020). Mid-term outcome of volar plate fixation for scaphoid nonunion. The Bone & Joint Journal, 102(12), 1697–1702. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.102B12.BJJ-2019-1160.R3
Yeh, C. W., Hsu, C. E., Wang, W. C., & Chiu, Y. C. (2020). Wrist function recovery course in patients with scaphoid nonunion treated with combined volar bone grafting and a dorsal antegrade headless screw. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 15(1), 519. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-02055-0
Hegazy, G., Alshal, E., Abdelaal, M., Abdelaziz, M., Moawad, M., Saqr, Y. M., et al. (2020). Kirschner wire versus Herbert screw fixation for the treatment of unstable scaphoid waist fracture nonunion using corticocancellous iliac bone graft: Randomized clinical trial. International Orthopaedics, 44(11), 2385–2393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04730-7
Cagnolati, A. F., Andrade, F. R., Rezende, L. G. R. A., Mazzer, N., Sugano, R. M. M., & Garcia, L. M. (2021). Internal fixation of scaphoid nonunion with humpback deformity using iliac graft and volar plate: Series of eight cases. Revista Brasileira De Ortopedia, 56(5), 588–593. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1735830
Welle, K., Taeger, S., Prangenberg, C., Hackenberg, R. K., Kieback, J.-D., & Kabir, K. (2022). Locking plate osteosynthesis of scaphoid nonunion with severe bone defects: A case series. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 8379. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12305-2
Ma, W., Yao, J., & Guo, Y. (2023). Clinical outcomes of double-screw fixation with bone grafting for displaced scaphoid nonunions: A series of 21 cases. Frontiers in Surgery, 10, 1096684. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1096684
Kang, H. J., Chun, Y. M., Oh, W. T., Koh, I. H., Lee, S. Y., & Choi, Y. R. (2016). The effect of debridement of coexisting partial ligament injuries on outcomes following arthroscopic osteosynthesis for minimally displaced scaphoid nonunions. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 41(6), e135-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.04.007
Lee, Y. K., Choi, K. W., Woo, S. H., Ho, P. C., & Lee, M. (2018). The clinical result of arthroscopic bone grafting and percutaneous K-wires fixation for management of scaphoid nonunions. Medicine, 97(13), e9987. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000009987
Liu, B., Wu, F., & Ng, C. Y. (2019). Wrist arthroscopy for the treatment of scaphoid delayed or nonunions and judging the need for bone grafting. The Journal of Hand Surgery, European, 44(6), 594–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193419841253
Wang, J. P., Huang, H. K., & Shih, J. T. (2020). Arthroscopic-assisted reduction, bone grafting and screw fixation across the scapholunate joint for proximal pole scaphoid nonunion. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 21(1), 834. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03850-w
Ecker, J., Shahbaz, L., Kohli, S., Breidahl, W., & Andrijich, C. (2022). Arthroscopic bone graft and internal fixation of non-union of the proximal pole of the scaphoid: Surgical technique and outcomes. Journal of Wrist Surgery, 11(6), 535–540. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1742097
Lee, Y. K., & Jung, Y. R. (2022). Arthroscopy-assisted bone grafting for the treatment of SNAC stage I without radial styloidectomy. Medicine, 101(32), e29930. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029930
Waitayawinyu, T., Lertcheewanan, W., Boonyasirikool, C., & Niempoog, S. (2022). Arthroscopic treatment of scaphoid nonunion with olecranon bone graft and screw fixation leads to union and improved outcomes. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 38(3), 761–772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2021.09.018
Waleed, B. M., Semaya, A. E., Mohammad, H., & El-Karef, E. A. (2022). Radiologic assessment of arthroscopic correction of humpback deformity in scaphoid fracture non-union. Senses and Sciences, 9(4), 10.
Wu, F., Zhang, Y., & Liu, B. (2022). Arthroscopic bone graft and fixation for proximal scaphoid nonunions. The Bone & Joint Journal, 104(8), 946–952. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.104B8.BJJ-2022-0198.R1
Bezirgan, U., Yoğun, Y., Gezer, M. C., & Armangil, M. (2023). Early clinical results of arthroscopic bone grafting and percutaneous K-wire fixation for the treatment of scaphoid non-union. Journal of Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, 76(1), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.4274/atfm.galenos.2023.35492
Lin, T. Y., Fu, C. W., Tsai, P. S., Huang, C. H., Wei, S. H., & Chuang, M. Y. (2023). Outcomes after arthroscopic treatment for scaphoid nonunion using ipsilateral radius bone graft and a headless compression screw: A comparison between the patients with and without avascular necrosis. International Orthopaedics, 47(4), 1041–1049. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-023-05700-5
Shih, Y. C., Wu, C. C., & Shih, J. T. (2023). Arthroscopic treatment of stable nonunion, unstable nonunion, or nonunion of the scaphoid with early degenerative radioscaphoid arthritis. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 18(1), 123. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03609-8
Cheng, C., Jiang, Z., Sun, H., Hu, J., & Ouyang, Y. (2023). Arthroscopic treatment of unstable scaphoid fracture and nonunion with two headless compression screws and distal radius bone graft. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 18(1), 52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03529-7
Acknowledgements
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
JAS and PB conceived and designed the study. JAS and KR performed the literature search. JAS, PB and PKA analysed the data. JAS wrote the first draft, and all authors commented on previous manuscript versions. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
Ethical Approval
The review was prospectively registered at PROSPERO—the International prospective register of systematic reviews—CRD42023399012.
Informed Consent
For this type of study, informed consent is not required.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Santoshi, J.A., Acharya, P.K., Behera, P. et al. Arthroscopic Versus Open Bone Grafting and Internal Fixation of Scaphoid Nonunion—A Systematic Review. JOIO (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-024-01233-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-024-01233-0