Abstract
The enhancement of energy efficiency stands as the principal avenue for attaining energy conservation and emissions reduction objectives within the realm of road transportation. Nevertheless, it is imperative to acknowledge that these objectives may, in part or in entirety, be offset by the phenomenon known as the energy rebound effect (ERE). To quantify the long-term EREs and short-term EREs specific to China’s road transportation, this study employed panel cointegration and panel error correction models, accounting for asymmetric price effects. The findings reveal the following: The long-term EREs observed in road passenger transportation and road freight transportation range from 13% to 25% and 14% to 48%, respectively; in contrast, the short-term EREs in road passenger transportation and road freight transportation span from 36% to 41% and 3.9% to 32%, respectively. It is noteworthy that the EREs associated with road passenger transportation and road freight transportation represent a partial rebound effect, falling short of reaching the magnitude of a counterproductive backfire effect. This leads to the inference that the upsurge in energy consumption within the road transportation sector cannot be solely attributed to advancements in energy efficiency. Instead, various factors, including income levels, the scale of commodity trade, and industrial structure, exert more substantial facilitating influences. Furthermore, the escalation of fuel prices fails to dampen the demand for energy services, whether in the domain of road passenger transportation or road freight transportation. In light of these conclusions, recommendations are proffered for the formulation of energy efficiency policies pertinent to road transportation.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Barla P, Lamonde B, Miranda-Moreno L F, Boucher N (2009). Traveled distance, stock and fuel efficiency of private vehicles in Canada: Price elasticities and rebound effect. Transportation, 36(4): 389–402
Berkhout P H G, Muskens J C, Velthuijsen J W (2000). Defining the rebound effect. Energy Policy, 28(6/7): 425–432
Böhringer C, Rivers N (2021). The energy efficiency rebound effect in general equilibrium. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 109: 102508
Chai J, Yang Y, Wang S, Lai K K (2016). Fuel efficiency and emission in China’s road transport sector: Induced effect and rebound effect. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 112: 188–197
Chaudry M, Jayasuriya L, Blainey S, Lovric M, Hall J W, Russell T, Jenkins N, Wu J (2022). The implications of ambitious decarbonisation of heat and road transport for Britain’s net zero carbon energy systems. Applied Energy, 305: 117905
Chen Q, Zha D L, Salman M (2022a). The influence of carbon tax on CO2 rebound effect and welfare in Chinese households. Energy Policy, 168: 113103 (in Chinese)
Chen Q, Zha D L, Wang L J, Yang G L (2022b). The direct CO2 rebound effect in households: Evidence from China’s provinces. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 155: 111888
Chen Z N, Du H B, Li J L, Southworth F, Ma S F (2019). Achieving low-carbon urban passenger transport in China: Insights from the heterogeneous rebound effect. Energy Economics, 81: 1029–1041
de Borger B, Mulalic I (2012). The determinants of fuel use in the trucking industry: Volume, fleet characteristics and the rebound effect. Transport Policy, 24: 284–295
Dillon H S, Saphores J D, Boarnet M G (2015). The impact of urban form and gasoline prices on vehicle usage: Evidence from the 2009 National Household Travel Survey. Research in Transportation Economics, 52(SI): 23–33
Dimitropoulos A, Oueslati W, Sintek C (2018). The rebound effect in road transport: A meta-analysis of empirical studies. Energy Economics, 75: 163–179
Feng R, Fang X K (2022). China’s pathways to synchronize the emission reductions of air pollutants and greenhouse gases: Pros and cons. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 184: 106392
Frondel M, Peters J, Vance C (2008). Identifying the rebound: Evidence from a German household panel. Energy Journal, 29(4): 145–163
Frondel M, Schmidt C M (2005). Evaluating environmental programs: The perspective of modern evaluation research. Ecological Economics, 55(4): 515–526
Gately D (1993). The imperfect price-reversibility of world oil demand. Energy Journal, 14(4): 163–182
Gillingham K (2014). Identifying the elasticity of driving: Evidence from a gasoline price shock in California. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 47(SI): 13–24
Gillingham K T, Rapson D S, Wagner G (2016). The rebound effect and energy efficiency policy. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 10(1): 68–88
Greening L A, Greene D L, Difiglio C (2000). Energy efficiency and consumption: The rebound effect, a survey. Energy Policy, 28(6/7): 389–401
Jia J X, Ma G R, Qin C, Wang L Y (2020). Place-based policies, stateled industrialisation, and regional development: Evidence from China’s Great Western Development Programme. European Economic Review, 123: 103398
Jiang Z J, Lin B Q (2013). China’s energy demand and its characteristics in the industrialization and urbanization process: A reply. Energy Policy, 60: 583–585
Khazzoom J D (1980). Economic implications of mandated efficiency in standards for household appliances. Energy Journal, 1(4): 21–40
Li J L, Li A J, Xie X (2018). Rebound effect of transportation considering additional capital costs and input-output relationships: The role of subsistence consumption and unmet demand. Energy Economics, 74: 441–455
Li K, Yan Y X, Zhang X L (2021). Carbon-abatement policies, investment preferences, and directed technological change: Evidence from China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 172: 121015
Li S J, Liu Y Y, Purevjav A O, Yang L (2019). Does subway expansion improve air quality? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 96: 213–235
Liu J Y, Zhang Y J (2021). Has carbon emissions trading system promoted non-fossil energy development in China? Applied Energy, 302: 117613
Malmaeus M, Hasselstrom L, Mellin A, Nyblom A, Akerman J (2023). Addressing rebound effects in transport policy: Insights from exploring five case studies. Transport Policy, 131: 45–55
Matos F J F, Silva F J F (2011). The rebound effect on road freight transport: Empirical evidence from Portugal. Energy Policy, 39(5): 2833–2841
Mizobuchi K (2008). An empirical study on the rebound effect considering capital costs. Energy Economics, 30(5): 2486–2516
Odeck J, Johansen K (2016). Elasticities of fuel and traffic demand and the direct rebound effects: An econometric estimation in the case of Norway. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 83: 1–13
Peng T D, Yuan Z Y, Ou X M, Wang G H (2017). Analysis of future vehicle fuel demand and direct CO2 emissions in China. Energy Procedia, 142: 2767–2772
Rottoli M, Dirnaichner A, Pietzcker R, Schreyer F, Luderer G (2021). Alternative electrification pathways for light-duty vehicles in the European transport sector. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 99: 103005
Safarzynska K, van den Bergh J C J M (2018). A higher rebound effect under bounded rationality: Interactions between car mobility and electricity generation. Energy Economics, 74: 179–196
Small K A, van Dender K (2007). Fuel efficiency and motor vehicle travel: The declining rebound effect. Energy Journal, 28(1): 25–51
Song P, Mao X Q, Li Z Y, Tan Z X (2023). Study on the optimal policy options for improving energy efficiency and co-controlling carbon emission and local air pollutants in China. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 175: 113167
Sorrell S, Dimitropoulos J (2008). The rebound effect: Microeconomic definitions, limitations and extensions. Ecological Economics, 65(3): 636–649
Sorrell S, Dimitropoulos J, Sommerville M (2009). Empirical estimates of the direct rebound effect: A review. Energy Policy, 37(4): 1356–1371
Sorrell S, Stapleton L (2018). Rebound effects in UK road freight transport. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 63: 156–174
Stapleton L, Sorrell S, Schwanen T (2016). Estimating direct rebound effects for personal automotive travel in Great Britain. Energy Economics, 54: 313–325
Tamannaei M, Zarei H, Rasti-Barzoki M (2021). A game theoretic approach to sustainable freight transportation: Competition between road and intermodal road-rail systems with government intervention. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 153: 272–295
Wang A Q, Yuan Z B, Liu X H, Wang M L, Yang J, Sha Q E, Zheng J Y (2022). Measurement-based intermediate volatility organic compound emission inventory from on-road vehicle exhaust in China. Environmental Pollution, 310: 119887
Wang H, Han J Y, Su M, Wan S L, Zhang Z C (2021). The relationship between freight transport and economic development: A case study of China. Research in Transportation Economics, 85: 100885
Wang H, Zhou P, Zhou D Q (2012). An empirical study of direct rebound effect for passenger transport in urban China. Energy Economics, 34(2): 452–460
Wang Z H, Lu M L (2014). An empirical study of direct rebound effect for road freight transport in China. Applied Energy, 133: 274–281
Winebrake J J, Green E H (2017). Environmental policy, decision making, and rebound effects in the US trucking sector. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 23: 54–63
Xia D, Zhang L (2022). Coupling coordination degree between coal production reduction and CO2 emission reduction in coal industry. Energy, 258: 124902
Zha D L, Chen Q, Wang L J (2022). Exploring carbon rebound effects in Chinese households’ consumption: A simulation analysis based on a multi-regional input-output framework. Applied Energy, 313: 118847 (in Chinese)
Zhang S S, Lin B Q (2018). Investigating the rebound effect in road transport system: Empirical evidence from China. Energy Policy, 112: 129–140
Zhang Y J, Liu Z, Qin C X, Tan T D (2017). The direct and indirect CO2 rebound effect for private cars in China. Energy Policy, 100: 149–161
Zhang Y J, Peng H R, Liu Z, Tan W (2015). Direct energy rebound effect for road passenger transport in China: A dynamic panel quantile regression approach. Energy Policy, 87(SI): 303–313
Zheng Y J, Xu H C, Jia R N (2022). Endogenous energy efficiency and rebound effect in the transportation sector: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 335: 130310
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 72074111).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zha, D., Jiang, P. & Zhang, X. Direct energy rebound effect for road transportation in China. Front. Eng. Manag. 10, 597–611 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-023-0276-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-023-0276-y