Abstract
In order to compensate for the stochastic nature of the power grid due to the tremendous development and the integration of renewable energy resources and meet its other requirements, the hydraulic turbines are forced to operate more frequently under partial load conditions with singular and misaligned flows inevitably excited by the inter-blade vortex. This paper presents numerical investigations of the unsteady characteristics of the inter-blade vortex for a low-head model Francis turbine. The SST k - ω turbulent model is used to close the unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equation. The flow structure of the inter blade vortex predicted by the numerical simulation is confirmed by experimental visualizations. It is shown that the total vortex volume in the runner sees a quasi-periodical oscillation, with significant flow separations created on the suction side of the runner blade. A counter measure by using the air admission into the water from the head cover is implemented to alleviate the undesirable effect of the inter-blade vortex. The analyses show that the development of the inter-blade vortex is significantly mitigated by the injecting air that controls and changes the spatial distribution of streamlines. Furthermore, the flow aeration with a suitable air flow rate can reduce the energy dissipation caused by the inter-blade vortex and plays a critical role in preventing the excessive amplitudes of the pressure fluctuation on the suction side of the runner blade. This investigation provides an insight into the flow mechanism underlying the inter-blade vortex and offers a reference to alleviate and mitigate the adverse consequences of the inter-blade vortex for the Francis turbine.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
REN21. Renewables 2020 global status report [R]. REN21 Secretariat, 2020.
Müller A., Favrel A., Landry C. et al. Fluid-structure interaction mechanisms leading to dangerous power swings in Francis turbines at full load [J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2017, 69: 56–71.
Kumar P., Saini R. P. Study of cavitation in hydro turbines—A review [J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2010, 14(1): 374–383.
Kurosawa S., Lim S. M., Enomoto Y. Virtual model test for a Francis turbine [J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2010, 12(1): 012063.
Luo X. W., Ji B., Tsujimoto Y. A review of cavitation in hydraulic machinery [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2016, 28(3): 335–358.
Cheng H. Y., Bai X. R., Long X. P. et al. Large eddy simulation of the tip-leakage cavitating flow with an insight on how cavitation influences vorticity and turbulence [J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2020, 77: 788–809.
Escaler X., Egusquiza E., Farhat M. et al. Detection of cavitation in hydraulic turbines [J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2006, 20(4): 983–1007.
Liu X., Luo Y., Wang Z. A review on fatigue damage mechanism in hydro turbines [J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 54: 1–14.
Dorji U., Ghomashchi R. Hydro turbine failure mechanisms: An overview [J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2014, 44: 136–147.
Goyal R., Gandhi B. K. Review of hydrodynamics instabilities in Francis turbine during off-design and transient operations [J]. Renewable Energy, 2018, 116: 697–709.
Li D., Fu X., Zuo Z. et al. Investigation methods for analysis of transient phenomena concerning design and operation of hydraulic-machine systems?A review [J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2019, 101: 26–46.
Li D., Wang H., Qin Y. et al. Mechanism of high amplitude low frequency fluctuations in a pump-turbine in pump mode [J]. Renewable Energy, 2018, 126: 668–680.
Trivedi C., Cervantes M. J., Gandhi B. et al. Experimental investigations of transient pressure variations in a high head model Francis turbine during start-up and shutdown [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2014, 26(2): 277–290.
Guo P., Wang Z., Sun L. et al. Characteristic analysis of the efficiency hill chart of Francis turbine for different water heads [J]. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2017, 9(2): 168781401769007.
Guo P. C., Wang Z. N., Luo X. Q. et al. Flow characteristics on the blade channel vortex in the Francis turbine [J]. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2016, 129(1): 012038.
Cheng H., Zhou L., Liang Q. et al. The investigation of runner blade channel vortices in two different Francis turbine models [J]. Renewable Energy, 2020, 156: 201–212.
Liu D. M., Liu X. B., Zhao Y. Z. Experimental Investigation of inter-blade vortices in a model Francis turbine [J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2017, 30(4): 854–865.
Liu M., Zhou L. J., Wang Z. W. et al. Investigation of channel vortices in Francis turbines [J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2016, 49(8): 082003.
Yamamoto K., Müller A., Favrel A. et al. Numerical and experimental evidence of the inter-blade cavitation vortex development at deep part load operation of a Francis turbine [J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2016, 49(8): 082005.
Yamamoto K., Müller A., Favrel A. et al. Guide vanes embedded visualization technique for investigating Francis runner inter-blade vortices at deep part load operation [C]. 6th IAHR International Meeting of the Workgroup on Cavitation and Dynamic Problems in Hydraulic Machinery and Systems, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 2015.
Yamamoto K., Müller A., Favrel A. et al. Experimental evidence of inter-blade cavitation vortex development in Francis turbines at deep part load condition [J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2017, 58(10): 142.
Yamamoto K., Müller A., Favrel A. et al. Pressure measurements and high speed visualizations of the cavitation phenomena at deep part load condition in a Francis turbine [J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2014, 22(2): 022011.
Magnoli M. V., Anciger D., Maiwald M. Numerical and experimental investigation of the runner channel vortex in Francis turbines regarding its dynamic flow characteristics and its influence on pressure oscillations [J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2019, 240(2): 022044.
Magnoli M. V., Maiwald M. Influence of hydraulic design on stability and on pressure pulsations in Francis turbines at overload, part load and deep part load based on numerical simulations and experimental model test results [J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2014, 22(3): 032013.
Bouajila S., Brammer J., Flores E. et al. Modelization and simulation of Francis turbine inter-blade vortices in partial load conditions [C]. SimHydro 2017-Choosing the Right Model in Applied Hydraulics, Nice, Francis, 2017.
Bouajila S., De Colombel T., Lowys P. Y. et al. Hydraulic phenomena frequency signature of Francis turbines operating in part load conditions [J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2016, 49(8): 082001.
Zuo Z., Liu S., Liu D. et al. Numerical predictions of the incipient and developed interblade vortex lines of a model Francis turbine by cavitation calculations [J]. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2013, 5: 397583.
Zuo Z. G., Liu S. H., Liu D. M. et al. Numerical analyses of pressure fluctuations induced by interblade vortices in a model Francis turbine [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2015, 27(4): 513–521.
Xiao Y., Wang Z., Zhang J. et al. Numerical analysis of blade channel vortex in Francis turbine at part load of middle-low head [C]. Proceedings of the ASME Fluids Engineering Division Summer Conference, New York, USA, 2009.
Xiao Y., Wang Z., Yan Z. Experimental and numerical analysis of blade channel vortices in a Francis turbine runner [J]. Engineering Computations, 2011, 28(1–2): 154–171.
Huai W. X., Wang Z. W., Qian Z. D. et al. Numerical simulation of sandy bed erosion by 2D vertical jet [J]. Science China Technological Sciences, 2011, 54(12): 3265–3274.
Li Z. W., Huai W. X., Qian Z. D. Study on the flow field and concentration characteristics of the multiple tandem jets in crossflow [J]. Science China Technological Sciences, 2012, 55(10): 2778–2788.
Unterluggauer J., Maly A., Doujak E. Investigation on the impact of air admission in a prototype Francis turbine at low-load operation [J]. Energies, 2019, 12(15): 2893.
Chen Z., Baek S. H., Cho H. et al. Optimal design of J-groove shape on the suppression of unsteady flow in the Francis turbine draft tube [J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2019, 33(5): 2211–2218.
Luo X., Yu A., Ji B. et al. Unsteady vortical flow simulation in a Francis turbine with special emphasis on vortex rope behavior and pressure fluctuation alleviation [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, 2017, 231(3): 215–226.
Chirkov D., Scherbakov P., Skorospelov V. et al. Numerical simulation of air injection in Francis turbine [J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2019, 240(2): 022043.
Qian Z. D., Yang J. D., Huai W. X. Numerical simulation and analysis of pressure pulsation in francis hydraulic turbine with air admission [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2007, 19(4): 467–472.
Menter F. R. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications [J]. AIAA Journal, 1994, 32(8): 1598–1605.
Sun L., Guo P., Luo X. Numerical investigation on interblade cavitation vortex in a Franics turbine [J]. Renewable Energy, 2020, 158: 64–74.
Hunt J. C. R., Wray A. A., Moin P. Eddies, streams, and convergence zones in turbulent flows [R]. Proceedings of the Summer Program. Center for Turbulent Research Report CTR-S88,1988, 193–208.
Dong X. R., Wang Y. Q., Chen X. P. et al. Determination of epsilon for Omega vortex identification method [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2018, 30(4): 541–548.
Liu C., Gao Y. S., Dong X. R. et al. Third generation of vortex identification methods: Omega and Liutex/Rortex based systems [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2019, 31(2): 205–223.
Zhang Y., Liu K., Xian H. et al. A review of methods for vortex identification in hydroturbines [J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, 81(Part 1): 1269–1285.
Zhang Y. N., Liu K. H., Li J. W. et al. Analysis of the vortices in the inner flow of reversible pump turbine with the new omega vortex identification method [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2018, 30(3): 463–469.
Zhang Y. N., Qiu X., Chen F. P. et al. A selected review of vortex identification methods with applications [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2018, 30(5): 767–779.
Zhang Y. N., Wang X. Y., Zhang Y. N. et al. Comparisons and analyses of vortex identification between Omega method and Q criterion [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2019, 31(2): 224–230.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Key Research and Development Program of Shaanxi Province (Grant No. 2017ZDXM-GY-081), the Scientific Research Program of Shaanxi Provincial Education Department (Grant No. 17JF019), the Scientific Research Program of Engineering Research Center of Clean Energy and Eco-hydraulics in Shaanxi Province (Grant Nos. QNZX-2019-05, QNZX-2019-06) and the Youth Innovation Team of Shanxi Universities (Grant No. 2020-29).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51839010).
Biography: Long-gang Sun (1988-), Male, Ph. D. Candidate
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sun, Lg., Guo, Pc. & Wu, Lc. Numerical investigation of alleviation of undesirable effect of inter-blade vortex with air admission for a low-head Francis turbine. J Hydrodyn 32, 1151–1164 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-020-0081-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-020-0081-6