Abstract
To investigate the effects of the caudal fin deformation on the hydrodynamic performance of the self-propelled thunniform swimming, we perform fluid-body interaction simulations for a tuna-like swimmer with thunniform kinematics. The 3-D vortices are visualized to reveal the role of the leading-edge vortex (LEV) in the thrust generation. By comparing the swimming velocity of the swimmer with different caudal fin flexure amplitudes fa, it is shown that the acceleration in the starting stage of the swimmer increases with the increase of fa, but its cruising velocity decreases. The results indicate that the caudal fin deformation is beneficial to the fast start but not to the fast cruising of the swimmer. During the entire swimming process, the undulation amplitudes of the lateral velocity and the yawing angular velocity decrease as fa increases. It is found that the formation of an attached LEV on the caudal fin is responsible for generating the low-pressure region on the surface of the caudal fin, which contributes to the thrust. Furthermore, the caudal fin deformation can delay the LEV shedding from the caudal fin, extending the duration of the low pressure on the caudal fin, which will cause the caudal fin to generate a drag-type force over a time period in one swimming cycle and reduce the cruising speed of the swimmer.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Webb P. W., Blake R. W. Swimming in functional vertebrate morphology [M]. Cambridge, USA: Harvard Univeristy Press, 1985.
Webb P. W. Hydrodynamics and energetics of fish propulsion [J]. Bulletin Fisheries Research Boad of Canada, 1975, 190: 33–48.
Videler J. J. Fish swimming [M]. London, UK: Chapman and Hall, 1993.
Yang, L., Su Y. M. CFD simulation of flow features and vorticity structures in tuna-like swimming [J]. China Ocean Engineering, 2011, 25(1): 73–82.
Tytell E. D., Lauder G. V. The hydrodynamics of eel swimming I. Wake structure [J]. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2004, 207: 1825–1841.
Ghommem M., Bourantas G., Wittek A. et al. Hydrodynamic modeling and performance analysis of bio-inspired swimming [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2020, 197: 106897.
Tytell E. D. Do trout swim better than eels? Challenges for estimating performance based on the wake of self-propelled bodies [J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2007, 43: 701–712.
Borazjani I., Sotiropoulos F. Numerical investigation of the hydrodynamics of carangiform swimming in the transitional and inertial flow regimes [J]. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2008, 211: 1541–1558.
Liu G., Ren Y., Dong H. et al. Computational analysis of vortex dynamics and performance enhancement due to body-fin and fin-fin interactions in fish-like locomotion [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2017, 829: 65–88.
Borazjani I., Daghooghi M. The fish tail motion forms an attached leading edge vortex [J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2013, 280(1756): 20122071.
Kern S., Koumoutsakos P. Simulations of optimized anguilliform swimming [J]. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2006, 209: 4841–4857.
Li G., Muller U., van Leeuwen J. L. et al. Body dynamics and hydrodynamics of swimming fish larvae: a computational study [J]. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2012, 215: 4015–4033.
Feng Y. K., Liu H. X., Su Y. Y. et al. Numerical study on the hydrodynamics of C-turn maneuvering of a tuna-like fish body under self-propulsion [J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2020, 94: 102954.
Feng Y. K., Su Y. Y., Liu H. X. et al. Numerical simulation of a self-propelled fish-like swimmer with rigid and flexible caudal fins [J]. Journal of Environmental Biology, 2020, 41(2): 161–170.
Cheng W. Research on simulation and control technology for bionic underwater vehicle [D]. Doctoral Thesis, Harbin, China: Harbin Engineering University, 2004(in Chinese).
Dewar H., Graham J. Studies of tropical tuna swimming performance in a large water tunnel-kinematics [J]. Journal of Experimental Biology, 1994, 192: 45–59.
Zhang X. Hydrodynamic study on biomimetic fish flipping caudal fin propulsion system [D]. Doctoral Thesis, Harbin, China: Harbin Engineering University, 2012(in Chinese).
Yang L., Su Y. M., Xiao Q. Numerical study of propulsion mechanism for oscillating rigid and flexible tuna-tails [J]. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2011, 8(4): 406–417.
Li N., Liu H., Su Y. Numerical study on the hydrodynamics of thunniform bio-inspired swimming under self-propulsion [J]. Plos One, 2017, 12(3): e0174740.
Hu J., Xiao Q. Three-dimensional effects on the translational locomotion of a passive heaving wing [J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2014, 46: 77–88.
ANSYS Inc. ANSYS Fluent User’s Guide [R]. ANSYS Inc., 2015.
Bergmann M., Lollo A., Mittal R. Effect of caudal fin deformation on the propulsive efficiency of a fish-like swimmer [J]. Bioinspiration and Biomimetics, 2014, 9(4): 046001.
Leroyer A., Visonneau M. Numerical methods for RANSE simulations of a self-propelled fish-like body [J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2005, 20: 975–991.
Donley J. M., Dickson K. A. Swimming kinematics of juvenile kawakawa tuna (Euthynnus affinis) and chub mackerel (Scomber japonicus) [J]. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2000, 203: 3103–3116.
Hunt J. C. R., Wray A. A., Moin P. Eddies, streams, and convergence zones in turbulent flows [R]. Proceedings of the Summer Program. Center for Turbulent Research Report CTR-S88,1988, 193–208.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51479039).
Biography: Yi-kun Feng (1992-), Male, Ph. D. Candidate
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Feng, Yk., Su, Ym., Liu, Hx. et al. The effects of caudal fin deformation on the hydrodynamics of thunniform swimming under self-propulsion. J Hydrodyn 32, 1122–1137 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-020-0080-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-020-0080-7