Abstract
Food packaging is one of the essential subject areas in food technology that play an important role in preserving all types of foods. Due to many disadvantages like a non-biodegradable and environmental problem in food packaging industry, a newer concept of use of biodegradable materials in food packaging from botanicals created tremendous innovative ideas in food packaging from past few years. An increased interest in hygiene in everyday life as well as in food, feed, and medical issues lead to a strong interest in films and blends to prevent the growth and accumulation of harmful bacteria. A growing trend is to use synthetic and natural antimicrobial polymers, to provide non-migratory and non-depleting protection agents for application in films, coatings, and packaging. The aim of this review was to offer a complete view of the state of the art on natural biodegradable polymer packages for food application compared to synthetics. Also, heightened overall developments in botanicals, natural and synthetic biopolymers in food packaging and its applications were described by focusing future improvements. This is a timely review as there has been a recent renewed interest in research studies, both in the industry and academia, towards the development of a new generation of biopolymer-based food packaging materials with possible applications in other areas. A lot of achievements in nanotechnology compared to synthetic materials attracted food industry for its wonderful applications in packaging was highlighted.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The best intention of recent research on botanicals started to develop alternative strategies to reduce dependency on synthetic chemicals. Plants have potential to synthesize a vast number of secondary metabolites, like phenols, phenolic acids, flavones, flavonols, flavonoids, quinones, tannins, and coumarins. The components with phenolic structures like carvacrol, eugenol, and thymol, had been extremely active against to pathogen. These group of compounds show antimicrobial outcomes and serves as defense mechanisms against pathogenic microorganisms.
In the food industry, antimicrobial substances are used in the form of sprays or dips. But, such direct application has limited benefits because the active substance is neutralized on contact with the food or it may diffuse rapidly from the surface into the food. Whereas, immobilization of such substances to the surface of a polymer helps to anchor them to the material thereby preventing their movement into the food and hence, sustaining their activity and stability over a long period of time. Covalent immobilization of an enzyme prevents its aggregation, proteolysis, and interaction with the hydrophobic surface. Currently, there is a strong interest in the use of renewable and non-toxic supports for immobilization to make the process more eco-friendly [53].
Packaging is one of the most important methods to maintain the quality of food products for storage, transportation, and end use. Oxygen, light, water vapor, bacteria and other contaminants can affect the product without protective packaging after processing [1]. It prevents the quality deterioration and facilitates distribution and marketing. Suitable packaging can slow down the deterioration rate and hence extend the shelf life of food. Use of petroleum-derived polymers such as polyethylene, polystyrene, polypropylene etc., are dominating in the packaging field, but these materials are not environmental friendly. Nowadays people are more conscious about the environment and they move towards environmental eco-friendly packaging systems.
Silver and gold nanoparticles show antibacterial activity. Generally, they are prepared by chemical and biological methods. Chemical preparations are widely studied because of their ease and wide applications. Several nano-composites have been reported by using various nanoparticles and with synthetic polymers [22]. Silver, gold, and copper nanoparticles are reported to exhibit a strong biocidal effect on more than sixteen species of bacteria including Escherichia coli [50]. Metallic, ceramic and, metal nanoparticles are added to polymers to obtain unique physical and mechanical properties which cannot be achieved by adding micron-sized particles. The extent of modification of the property depends on the base polymer, the size, distribution, and dispersion of the nanoparticles and on the adhesion at the filler-matrix interface [89]. A nano-particle dispersed in the polymer is called polymer nano-composite and it is considered as a single homogeneous material. These materials exhibit unique thermal, mechanical, and biological properties when compared to conventional composites. Nanoparticles have an extremely large relative surface area to volume, and hence increasing their contact with bacteria or fungi, vastly improve their bactericidal and fungicidal effectiveness. They bind to microbial DNA, preventing bacterial replication, and to sulfhydryl groups in the metabolic enzymes of the bacterial electron transport chain, causing their inactivation [82]. Pertaining to current literature available information here we tried to relook for the natural sources, and technology. For public safety purpose, we took present investigation and pointed out the solutions of food safety.
Now Again in the Twenty-first Century, Why We Should Consider Botanicals?
Scientists are moving back to botanicals due to following reasons:
-
Eco-friendly.
-
Organic forming.
-
Easily bio-degradable.
-
Integrated diseases management.
-
Sustainable solutions in agriculture.
-
Less toxicity and use it as it is in food.
-
Use in multiple applied technology based applications.
Recently in 2016 Indian government has banned almost 344 drugs quoting the exact phrase “These antibiotic drugs containing fix dose of one or more combination of antibiotic drugs from bacteria mainly containing atropine and analgesic or antipyretic are causing anti-microbial resistance. The usage could even result in organ-failure”. Many of these antibiotic and synthetic drugs have already been banned in many countries or cannot be sell without Federal approval. Plants secrete number of secondary metabolites having aromatic structures as a by-product of the usual metabolic processes. Until 2016, almost 50,000 secondary metabolites have been discovered in the plant system, involved in plant defense system against Bacteria, Viruses, and Fungi etc. Many of these possess antimicrobial activity against many classes of bacteria, virus, insects and many other harmful organisms [38]. In 2011, Indian medicinal plants have been detected with potential activity against HIV [80]. So, Botanicals show promising future towards treating some of fatal diseases in the world and list of antimicrobials incorporated directly into polymers used for food packaging tabulated in Table 1.
There are six major phytochemical groups commonly found in botanicals are phenolic and phenolic acids-chlorogenic acid, protocatechuic acid, ferulic acid, caffeic acid, flavonoids and iso-flavonoids, saponins, steroids, tannins, and coumarins and pyrones. These major phytochemical mechanisms of action were described in Table 2 [23, 54].
Why Botanicals are Losing it Attention?
-
Less effective.
-
Rapid degradation.
-
Less availability of formulations.
-
Extraction methods are not properly standardized.
-
Need proper knowledge on formulations for bioavailability.
-
Most studies are in vitro efficacy, not effective at in vivo level.
-
Some chemical components shows side effect to human and plants.
-
Poor knowledge on proper extraction and determination, and validation of potent compound.
Packaging helps to protect the food spoilage from different microorganisms, physically damage, filth, and insects. Active packaging is the incorporation of novel nonmaterial’s into the packing material to prolong the shelf-life of the product while retaining dietary satisfactory and assuring microbial safety [43]. Nowadays a number of different methods available for better management of food spoilage. But the new era deviating from synthetic to natural things to avoid the possible dangerous effects of chemicals on the health.
Foods are primarily packaged to protect them from the environment with good biophysical properties to the packaging material (Table 3) and to provide ingredient and nutritional information to the consumers. However, food packaging has become a central focus of waste reduction efforts because proper waste management is important to protect human health and environment. The use of plastics over glass and metals has continued to increase due to their good materials properties and low cost. Thus, they find their origin in the petrochemical industry making them non-biodegradable and non-renewable. With the current focus on exploring alternatives to petroleum and emphasis on reduced environmental impact, research is increasingly being directed at the development of biodegradable food packaging from renewable resources.
Synthetic polymer material has been extensively used in every field of human life, most of which are derived from petroleum and its derivatives; the most common of such material is non-biodegradable [64]. The petro-based polymers used widely for food packaging are polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyethylene (PE), high-density polyethylene (HDPE), low-density polyethylene (LDPE), polypropylene (PP), polystyrene (PS) and polyvinyl chloride (PVC). Such materials have high mechanical support, high-speed production and low permeability and low production costs as well. The huge amount of waste generated by usage of non-biodegradable materials are hazardous to environment, difficult to eliminate [10] and many other issues associated with food packaging materials (Table 4). The material which is biodegradable are therefore attention since 1970’s [64]; especially in context to medical usage (suture materials), food industry (spoilage resistant packaging materials) etc. Although biodegradable material such as polycaprolactone (PCL) are available from petroleum sources, still developing food packaging materials with well defined properties (Table 5) from natural sources for different applications has been a hot topic for several years due to rise in prices of highly limited artificial sources such as petroleum [28, 44]. It’s important to satisfy the consumers demanding of more environmentally friendly packaging i.e. natural products, bio-based films or Biopolymers. This notion will continue to be highly relevant with respect to consumables (in the food industry) [24, 81].
Synthetics
Synthetic drugs are chemical synthesized imitating natural antimicrobial substances. Gerhard Domagk in 1932 discovered the red diazo dye, Prontosil having antibacterial activity and low toxicity (mice). It is considered as a first synthetic drug for which he was awarded Nobel Prize in 1939. Prontosil was a derivative form of Sulphonamide which was realized later on. Sulphonamides, Cotrimoxazole, Quinolones are some of the basic synthetic drugs which are used for medicinal purposes from several decades. Numerous synthetic chemicals are also used as preservatives in food and pharma industries.
Mode of Action of These Synthetic Drugs are Classified on the Basis of Their Activity
Anti-Metabolites
Most of the time synthetic drugs act as a competitive inhibitor of metabolites and halt basic life process in Bacteria or fungus. Sulfa drugs compete with p-aminobenzoic acid (PABA), play important role in biosynthesis of Folic acid. Folic acid plays a crucial role as co-factor of many enzymes. Sulphanilamide acts as a structure analog of PABA. Anti-metabolites also act by uncoupling the reactions. Bronopol and organo-mercurials target thiol group containing enzymes present in the cytoplasm.
Cell Membrane Agents
A compound like parabens, hexochlorophene, dichlorphene (phenols) disturbs membrane permeability of the cell turning it into “leaky” and ultimately leads to cell death due to loss of cytoplasm containing essential constituent [29, 39]. Sorbic acid interferes with transport of molecules across the cell membrane and affects fumaric acid oxidation. Chelators such as EDTA form complex with diatomic ions such as Ca2+ and Mg2 [76]. Hence, they disturb the integrity of membrane and strengthen the effect of other antimicrobial agents like 4-chloroxylenol.
Cell Wall Agents
A compound like Glutaraldehyde, phenols, EDTA involve in cell wall lysis. Glutaraldehyde irreversibly crosses- link with cell-wall. Although, the synthetic drugs have proved efficient in treating many diseases and avoiding spoilage but, these chemicals have many adverse effects which overshadow their treatment efficiency. Drugs like fluoroquinolones, Co-trimoxazole, Sulfa drugs have side effects like Nausea, Vomiting, Dizziness, Headache, Mental depression, Confusion, Bone marrow depression, Loss of appetite, Colic, Drowsiness, and Unconsciousness.
In November 2015, FDA advisory committee handed a report accounting risk factors associated with Fluoroquinolone antibacterial drug in acute bacterial sinusitis, Bronchitis, and urinary tract infection. In the report, a committee has mentioned various side effects like Neuropathy, Cardiac Arrhythmia, Tendonitis, and Tendon rupture. So, a committee has recommended label warnings because of rare but detrimental effects [17]. In the case of preservatives also there are following adverse effect:
-
Sulphites According to FDA, different form of sulphite preservative causes allergies in more than million people and these allergies include Asthma, Headache, and Anaphylactic shocks.
-
Sodium benzoate, benzoic acid Sodium Benzoate can react with Vitamin C and form Benzene which act as a Carcinogen causing Leukaemia and other Cancer.
-
Propyl gallate—People consuming propyl gallate containing food are more prone to cancer.
-
BHA, BHT, and TBHQ These chemicals after prolong intake can act as carcinogen.
-
Sodium nitrite and nitrate At higher temperature, they form Nitrosamine, which is a Carcinogen.
Synthetic preservative and chemicals has various side effects which range from very mild to life-threatening. So, it is best to use botanicals as an alternative substitute which has very less or no side effect and cost effective too. Botanicals such as Salvia officinalis, Cinnamomum Sp., Rosmarinus officinalis, Pimentaracemosa, Syzygiumaromaticum, Citrussps.(citral) essential oils can be used as a substitute of synthetic preservatives [97]. Synthetic and natural polymers characteristic features were depicted in Table 6. Researchers so far proved that botanicals have great potential as preservatives and medicinal substitute avoiding antimicrobial resistance and side effects.
Nature Versus Man
Many food-borne diseases (referred as food poisoning or food-borne illness) result from the consumption of soiled or contaminated food by pathogenic bacteria, fungi, viruses, and parasites. The economic burden associated with these can affect food companies, peoples, and reputation of the country. Still, diseases associated with these pathogens globally still not under the control, which intern leading to great economic imbalance and mortality rate. May be primary cause associated with handling food in the unhygienic state, practices during food production, transport and storing conditions. So there is a need for many novel, cost effective, applicable steps to combat future outbreaks. Individual pathogens develop their own defense strategy by expressing specific determinants/molecules on their own cell membrane to attach host cell-surface. When pathogen adherent molecules adhere to host, it is the critical state of pathogen start to colonize and infect very effectively by utilizing sufficient nutrient from the host. However, many pathogens sense their surrounding environment and can respond by altering molecular gene expression; leads to protective response may follow tremendous tolerating adaptation to a number of stress conditions. This phenomenon is called stress adaptation may intern cause survival capability tin food products and their respective environment. This special property of pathogens can develop specific virulence properties and contribute to survival under number host defense mechanisms. One side elucidating mechanism involved in stress adaptation, the effectiveness of natural and synthetic compounds against food-borne pathogens is the primary requisite for the development of effective control measures will permit implementation of new optimal condition and packaging material for food safety with consumer demand [12]. Even with well-developed technologies and modern food preservatives available also, an excessive amount of food loss due to microbial spoilage specifically the formation of biofilm acting as an obstacle for human and benefit for pathogens. Attachment of these pathogens to food and packaged surfaces by biofilms leads to sever public health risk and great economic loss. The recent work suggested that bacterial cell to cell communication attacked a researcher to manifest role of quorum signals in the attachment of pathogens to food and packaged surfaces. The communication responsible molecule in spoilage food was the one of the hot element to combat the food spoilage process [34]. Consequently, there are a number of advantages using natural compounds in toxicity, availability, and cost compared to synthetic compounds. Synthetic materials showed a vast number of applications, but disadvantages like they are permeable to oxygen; is a special sound in food packaging. That’s why scientist thinking to coat wafer-thin layers on plastic for multiple applications in a number of areas. Biopolymers which added a special active nanoparticle (designed with or without natural materials) provides new packaging technology to improve food preservation properties. This is designed to protect the contents from their surrounding and to extend the shelf life of food. Improving oxygen barrier by utilizing many technologies can sound to combat irregular technologies. High density polyethylene (HDPE), Linear low density polyethylene (LDPE), Polycaprolactam (PCL) and Low-density polyethylene (LDPE) applications in controlling food spoilage by cross-linking active natural molecules and suitable enzyme immobilization to polymer exhibited beautiful association between nature and man through technology was proved against S. aureus [53].
Biopolymers
The ‘biopolymer’ refers to polymers that are generally obtained from natural sources (renewable) and can be degraded by various environmental factors upon exposure (soil moisture, microorganisms, and oxygen), into carbon dioxide, nitrogen, water and other minerals. Polymer materials are solid, nonmetallic compounds of high molecular weights. They contain repeating units called monomer. The properties that are required of an ideal packaging material includes: thermal stability, flexibility, good barrier to gases, good barrier to water, resistance to chemicals, biocompatibility, biodegradability; these are directly affected by the structure of monomer used in polymer preparation. Biopolymers can be classified according to their source [72, 73, 96] and/or method of production as follows:
-
Category 1 Polymers directly extricated from plant or animal biomass or natural biopolymers; includes polysaccharide, protein, and lipids (waxes, glycerides).
-
Category 2 Polymers synthesized from chemical synthesis or synthetic biodegradable biopolymers; includes polylactic acid (PLA).
-
Category 3 Polymers produced by natural/genetically engineered microorganisms or microbial biopolymers; includes poly hydroxy alkanoates (PHA), poly β hydroxy butyrate (PHB) and poly β hydroxy butyrate-co-3 hydroxy valerate, cellulose, xanthan, pullulan [56, 60, 77].
Food Packaging
Packaging materials provide a means to preserve, protect, distribute and store food for a long time. It is crucial to transport products that need to be safe and wholesome when reaching consumers; hence the quality of food is not compromised. When the food comes in contact with oxygen/moisture etc., its various components undergo oxidation intern oxidative damage leads to food spoilage and become off taste due to microbial contamination. So one of the effective barrier preventing food spoilage by microorganisms and environmental factors is the proper packaging of food may extend the shelf life of food products by avoiding adherence and growth of the pathogen to the packaging material. The packaging industry is the largest user of polymers; more than 90% of flexible packaging is made of them, compared to only 17% of rigid packaging [63]. Unlike rigid (metal cans and glass jars), flexible packaging is relatively permeable to gases, water vapor, and other small penetrable molecules. Therefore, such materials when used for packaging of oxygen sensitive foods it should possess low oxygen permeability and needs essentially high barrier requirement. Materials for polymeric packages must possess numerous characteristics (Table 7) such as mechanical strength, heat resistance, tensile resistance, chemical resistance, and transparency etc. [63].
Justification for Natural and Synthetic Polymers
Many bioplastics are mixes or blends containing synthetic components, that improves its functional properties and hence the finished product can be used for a range of application. Bioplastics have a large number of applications such as agriculture, horticulture, toys, fibers, textiles, medical fields and very importantly in food industries for food packaging application is gaining importance (http://www.european-bioplastics.org). With the context of food packaging, it is important to study the change that occurs on the characteristics of the bioplastics during the time of interaction with the food [84]. Synthetic and natural polymers are opposite in their many properties: polyolefins are hydrocarbon hydrophobic polymers, resistant to peroxidation, biodegradation, highly resistant to hydrolysis which makes them non-biodegradable. Natural compounds, like cellulose, starch and so on, are hydrophilic polymers water wettable or swellable and consequently biodegradable. They are not technologically useful for food packaging, where water resistance is needed. Between these extremes reside the hydro-biodegradable aliphatic polyesters such as polylactic acid (PLA) and the polyhydroxy acid (PHA) [83]. Fully biodegradable synthetic polymers, such as polylactic acid (PLA), polycaprolactone (PCL), and polyhydroxy butyrate-valerate (PHBV) have been commercially available since 1990. Such synthetic polymers are more expensive than petroleum based polymers and also have slow degradability; hence blending starch with these degradable synthetic polymers is in focus of research for enhanced applicability in future.
Active Packaging
Active packaging is a system that changes the environment inside the food package by altering its head space to enhance its quality by extending the shelf life, enhancing look, maintaining taste or smell of food product, and mainly avoiding microbial entry is the foremost importance playing in food industries to provide safety food for consumers [70]. In this regard, the growing popularity of active packaging is due to the desire for high-quality safe and natural products amongst consumers [62].
Mechanisms Involved in Active Food Packaging
-
Water scavenging from fresh produce that is any minimally processed prepared foods, as a result of normal respiration or microbiological activity, can occur as evaporation from the product followed by permeation through the package material, when a proper water–vapor barrier is not there, Several desiccants’ such as silicates (i.e., silica gel) and humidity-controlling salts have long been used in food packaging, particularly to maintain the relative humidity surrounding dry foods and non-food products. Silica gel, its moisture-absorbing rate, and the water vapor transmission rate are dependent, usually at a very low relative humidity.
-
Oxygen scavenging leads to various adverse effects on food/beverages and deteriorates nutritional and quality of food. Some are listed as follows (a) Rancidity due to oxidation of unsaturated fats present in food material; may lead to formation of toxic products. (b) Loss of vitamin C (ascorbic acid) (c) Browning of meat products (d) Proliferation of aerobic spoilage causing microorganisms (e) Off-odors from bakery products (f) Growth of insects/insect eggs. (g) Increase in respiration of fresh produce. (h) Phenol induced browning in freshly cut vegetables and fruits. Mechanisms involved in active food safety: oxygen scavenger refers to materials incorporated into package structures, that chemically combine with, and thus effectively remove, oxygen from the inner package environment; ultimately removing oxygen from the food product through diffusion, resulting from differential partial pressure. Scavengers are fast, high capacity oxygen interceptors which are capable of eliminating relatively large volumes of oxygen and continuing till the scavenger is present.
-
Antimicrobial compounds have been incorporated into films for use in active packaging. These are included in active packaging because they rely on diffusion through the packaging medium instead of a triggered release of antimicrobials through responsive materials [14]. Edible and non-edible films are also of interest wherein natural antimicrobial ingredients like clove, pepper, cinnamon, coffee, and others are incorporated [40, 55]. Chitosan, another biologically derived polymeric bio-material, is also being researched extensively due to its inherent, natural antimicrobial activities and non-toxicity [3, 46, 93].
Nanotechnology in Food Packaging
New food technologies are always creating a tremendous curiosity in the food industry. Scientist continuously working hard for developing food application methods for public use, health concern and economic status of the country. The most promising benefit of hot nanotechnology near future for food industries. Research and development (R&D) in the area of nanotechnology continuously extending the shelf life of food and drinks by improving the safety. One of the promising active areas in food packaging is smart packaging by use of nanotechnology to develop active antimicrobial packaging. Packaging material incorporates ‘smart’ nano molecules which respond to environmental alterations, intern alert itself or alert consumer. In this regard scientists working at big name companies like Bayer, Kodak, and Kraft as well as a number of universities, smaller companies putting hand together to develop smart food packaging material to absorb oxygen, detect pathogen associated with food and at the same time to alert consumers for spoilage food. Now E. coil and Salmonella detecting smart packaging material is ready to release in few years. According to the industry analyst, the current market for this technology in the US is estimated that $58 billion at the end of 2015. Similar technology was developing for US government by Netherlands using smart packaging nanotechnology that will not only detect when food is beginning to spoilage but will also release preservatives to food to extend the shelf life food. So, this type of solutions is some of the tremendous innovations in the food industry today. Many other applications attacked a number of researchers in the field of food packaging, food processing, agriculture and other fields with interesting mechanism discussed broadly [11, 15, 16].
Nano/biomimetic Adhesives
The utilization of potent tissue adhesives in aqueous environments is a big challenge. Absorbed water can diminish the physical surface adhesion forces and acid–base interactions, which leads to changes in the chemical bonds. Therefore, tissue adhesives should be resistant to the aqueous environment of the body fluids. Synthetic and natural derived adhesives materials show some disadvantages regarding their adhesion properties on wet substrates. One of the great alternatives for adhesive material utilization under the aqueous condition is Biomimetic adhesives. Two great sources for biomimetic adhesives inspired from nature are, from some animal feet to surfaces (such as geckos and frogs) and some ocean creatures based on biochemical secretion along with having nano structural features. Emphasize on the importance of inspiration from the nature for designing new adhesives and review recent research in this field which is rapidly expanding.
From Marine Creatures
Brown Algae
Brown algae release a viscous adhesive established on carbohydrates that contain polysaccharides and glycoproteins. Also, phenolic polymers play an enormous function in brown algae’s adhesion to hard surfaces. The composition of polyphenols consists of phloroglucinol items which act much like DOPA residues of tube worms and mussels seeing that they can type go-hyperlinks by way of oxidation. Actually, the alginate founded adhesives are inspired from and similar to algae adhesive. This adhesive has a merit that it adheres well to both hydrophilic surfaces equivalent to collagen sheets and to hydrophobic surfaces akin to plastic. Novel biomimetic glue has been studied on already with an adhesion mechanism just like the adhesion of algae composed of alginate gel and native phloroglucinol [13].
Mussels
Mussels produce byssus to adhere themselves to the various surfaces in their environment. Byssus consists of protein threads hooked up to the mussel’s foot where there is a flattened plaque at the end which is an interface for adhesion to the surface. The animal has 4 distinguished glands in its foot that secret targeted products and these products form the plaque. These products include a mucous material, a collagenous layer, a combination of poly phenolic proteins often called foot proteins, and an adjunct protein. The chief similarity between these proteins is the existence of 3, 4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA), a modified amino acid, which cross-links the proteins and acts as an arbitrator in adhesion to the surface. The oxidative conversion of DOPA to DOPA-quinone enables the adhesive proteins to cross-link. A great advantage of this adhesive is its sufficient mechanical strength of adhesion under the wet conditions and the ability of adhesion to a wide range of materials such as metals, plastics, and glasses.
Nano-biomimetic Adhesives
In nature, complicated topographical floor designs, with reversible adhesion to enhance physical interactions were determined in some animals. Two magnificent designs are fibrillar pads determined in gecko feet, and tender pads determined in tree frog feet. A gecko’s pad includes long keratinous hairs (setae) which have a length of 30—a hundred thirty mm. These hairs incorporate thousands of nubs ended via 200–500 nm spatula-shaped structures. The attachment pads of tree frogs incorporate a hexagonal sample of 10 mm epithelial cells. 1 mm vast channels separate the cells and divide them into an array of nanopillars (>300–400 nm in diameter). The fibrillar attachment pads show up in various geometrical shapes in these animals. For example, toroidal, flat, sucker-like, band-like, spatula-like, filament-like, spherical, and conical tip shapes were located in this case. These distinctive geometries furnish the reversible adhesion of the animals to each dry and wet surfaces. Utilizing nano/micro fabrication procedures equivalent to nanoimprint lithography (NIL) and electron beam lithography (EBL), surfaces with identical geometries were designed in latest years.
Gecko
The capacity of geckos to connect to hard, tender, vertical, and reverse surfaces ended in researches about the adhesion mechanism of gecko toes and utilizes it in adhesive systems. The compact fibrillar arrays which quilt the bottom of gecko ft develop the outside adhesion to its highest. The adhesion of animal feet to a floor is managed with the aid of a combination of capillary and van der Waals forces. In recent years, situated on these results, adhesives influenced from the gecko for use in moist environments akin to quite a lot of tissues have been developed with a view to connecting to organic surfaces effectively by creating reversible non-covalent bonds below water. There had been attempts to mimic the fibrillar structure of gecko ft via utilizing strategies like lithography and dry etching in oxygen plasma on micro patterned poly (imide) films [66].
Frog
The Australian frog (Notaden bennett) secretes a protein-based adhesive on its again when sensing a threat. This adhesive is strong, bendy, potentially biocompatible, and sets in water. A number of fascinating critiques were achieved on this adhesive to show its benefits in special biomedical purposes. This adhesive used to be applied on a sheep cartilage with the intention to repair it. The results illustrated that this adhesive had a better effect compared to fibrin/gelatin adhesives and weaker force in assessment to cyanoacrylate adhesives on this tissue. Remarkable antibacterial and healing results were observed in a system of frog skin powder on wounds. In one more gain knowledge of, it used to be recognized that a peptide with the capacity of promoting the wound remedy process exists in the dermis of the Odorrana graham frog. Its fascinating pastime was found in a full thickness dermal wound, created in a murine mannequin [35, 47]. Researchers have proven that the biocompatibility and biodegradability of this adhesive are favorable despite the fact that the researchers on this adhesive are still being endured to check the distinct adhesion mechanism and the role of proteins involved in the mechanism.
Conclusion
Currently, when the environmentally safe and sustainable development is crucial to the social research, production, and utilization of (bio)degradable polymers becomes an increasingly important issue. Biopolymers have vast diversity, and therefore their applications in food packaging are various and multiple. This review covers the major concerns about the botanicals sources and its applications, natural and synthetic polymers and nanotechnology based applications in food packaging, their structure, and sources also elaborated systematically. It is clear that bio-based packaging materials offer a versatile potential in case of packaging industry however, there is need of certain storage tests to be performed on packaging machinery in order to certify the use of these packaging films on a commercial scale. So in future, critical evaluation is required to access the functionality of bio-based packaging materials before they are launched into the market as sole substitutes for conventional packaging materials.
References
Ahvenainen R (ed) (2003) Novel food packaging techniques. Elsevier, London
Ahvenainen R, Hurve E (1997) Active and smart packaging for meeting consumer demands for quality and safety. Food Addit Contam 14(6–7):753–763
Aider M (2010) Chitosan application for active bio-based films production and potential in the food industry: review. LWT Food Sci Technol 43(6):837–842
Alavi S, Giannetta F, Nanjundaswamy A, Madl R, Vadlani P (2014) Delivery of antioxidants through fruits and antioxidants in extruded foods. Cereal Food World 4:179–185
Appendini P, Hotchkiss JH (2002) Review of antimicrobial food packaging. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol 3(2):113–126
Aranaz I, Harris R, Navarro-García F, Heras A, Acosta N (2016) Chitosan based films as supports for dual antimicrobial release. Carbohydr Polym 146:402–410
Arcan I, Yemenicioğlu A (2011) Incorporating phenolic compounds opens a new perspective to use zein films as flexible bioactive packaging materials. Food Res Int 44(2):550–556
Arvanitoyannis IS (1999) Totally and partially biodegradable polymer blends based on natural and synthetic macromolecules: preparation, physical properties, and potential as food packaging materials. J Macromol Sci Rev Macromol Chem Phys C39:205–271
Auras R, Harte B, Selke S (2004) An over view of polylactides as packaging materials. Macromol Biosci 4:835–864
Azeredo HM, Miranda KW, Ribeiro HL, Rosa MF, Nascimento DM (2012) Nanoreinforced alginate–acerola puree coatings on acerola fruits. J Food Eng 113(4):505–510
Baeumner A (2004) Nanosensors identify pathogens in food. Food Technol 58(8):51–55
Begley M, Hill C (2015) Stress adaptation in foodborne pathogens. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol 6:191–210
Bitton R, Josef E, Shimshelashvili I, Shapira K, Seliktar D, Bianco-Peled H (2009) Phloroglucinol-based biomimetic adhesives for medical applications. Acta Biomater 5(5):1582–1587
Brockgreitens J, Abbas A (2016) Responsive food packaging: recent progress and technological prospects. Comprehen Rev Food Sci Food saf 15:3–15
Brody AL (2003) “Nano, Nano” food packaging technology. Food Technol 57(12):52–58
Brody AL (2006) Nano and food packaging technologies converge. Food Technol 60(3):92–94
Burton TM (2015) “FDA panel seeks tougher antibiotic labels”. Wall Street J
Chandra R, Rustgi R (1998) Biodegradable polymers. Prog Polym Sci 23(7):1273–1335
Chen XG, Zheng L, Wang Z, Lee CY, Park HJ (2002) Molecular affinity and permeability of different molecular weight chitosan membranes. J Agri Food Chem 50(21):5915–5918
Chung SK, Cho SH, Lee DS (1998) Modified atmosphere packaging of fresh strawberries by antimicrobial plastic films. Korean J Food Sci Technol 30(5):1140–1145
Chung KT, Wong TY, Wei CI, Huang YW, Lin Y (1998) Tannins and human health: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 38(6):421–464
Corcione CE, Maffezzoli A (2009) Glass transition in thermosetting clay-nanocomposite polyurethanes. Thermochim Acta 485(1):43–48
Cowan MM (1999) Plant products as antimicrobial agents. Clin Microbiol Rev 12(4):564–582
Cutter CN (2006) Opportunities for bio-based packaging technologies to improve the quality and safety of fresh and further processed muscle foods. Meat Sci 74(1):131–142
Darmadji P, Izumimoto M (1994) Effect of chitosan in meat preservation. Meat Sci 38(2):243–254
De Kruijf N, van Beest M, Rijk R, Sipilailen-Malm T, Pasaero-Losada P, de Meulenaur B (2002) Active and intelligent packaging: application and regulatory aspects. Food Addit Contam 19:144–162
Fang JM, Fowler PA, Escrig C, Gonzalez R, Costa JA, Chamudis L (2005) Development of biodegradable laminate films derived from naturally occurring carbohydrate polymers. Carbohyd Polym 60(1):39–42
Farris S, Schaich KM, Liu LS, Piergiovanni L, Yam KL (2009) Development of polyion-complex hydrogel sasan alternative approach for the production of bio-based polymers for food packaging applications: a review. Trends Food Sci Technol 20(8):316–332
Fassihi RA (1991) Preservation of medicines against microbial contamination. In: Block SS (ed) Disinfection, sterilization and preservation, 4th edn. Lea & Febiger, Malvern, pp 871–886
Fernandez-Saiz P, Soler C, Lagaron JM, Ocio MJ (2010) Effects of chitosan films on the growth of Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus and Salmonella spp. in laboratory media and in fish soup. Int J Food Microbiol 137(2):287–294
Floros JD, Dock LL, Han JH (1997) Active packaging technologies and applications. Food Cos Drug Packag 20(1):10–17
Galet VM, Clemente RG, Muñoz PH (2015) Novel antimicrobial films based on ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymers for food packaging application (Doctoral dissertation, Universitat Politècnica de València)
Gherardi R, Becerril R, Nerin C, Bosetti O (2016) Development of a multilayer antimicrobial packaging material for tomato puree using an innovative technology. LWT Food Sci Technol 72(2016):361–367
Gopu V, Meena CK, Shetty PH (2015) Quercetin influences quorum sensing in food borne bacteria: in vitro and in silico evidence. PLoS One 10(8):e0134684
Graham LD, Danon SJ, Johnson G, Braybrook C, Hart NK, Varley RJ, Ramshaw JA (2010) Biocompatibility and modification of the protein-based adhesive secreted by the Australian frog Notaden bennetti. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 93(2):429–441
Ha JU, Kim YM, Lee DS (2001) Multilayered antimicrobial polyethylene films applied to the packaging of ground beef. Packag Technol Sci 14(2):55–62
Hanani ZN, Beatty E, Roos YH, Morris MA, Kerry JP (2012) Manufacture and characterization of gelatin films derived from beef, pork and fish sources using twin screw extrusion. J Food Eng 113(4):606–614
Hartmann T (2007) From waste products to ecochemicals: fifty years research of plant secondary metabolism. Phytochemistry 68(22):2831–2846
Hugo WB, Russell AD (1998) Pharmaceutical microbiology. Blackwell Science. doi:10.1002/9780470988329.fmatter
Jo HJ, Park KM, Na JH, Min SC, Park KH, Chang PS, Han J (2015) Development of anti-insect food packaging film containing a polyvinyl alcohol and cinnamon oil emulsion at a pilot plant scale. J Stored Prod Res 61:114–118
Joerger RD, Sabesan S, Visioli D, Urian D, Joerger MC (2009) Antimicrobial activity of chitosan attached to ethylene copolymer films. Packag Technol Sci 22(3):125–138
Khan YH, Islam A, Sarwar A, Gull N, Khan SM, Munawar MA, Zia S, Sabir A, Shafiq M, Jamil T (2016) Novel green nano composites films fabricated by indigenously synthesized graphene oxide and chitosan. Carbohyd Polym. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.03.031
Labuza TP, Breene W (1989) Application of ‘active packaging’ technologies for the improvement of shelf-life and nutritional quality of fresh and extended shelf-life foods. In: Nutritional impact of food processing, vol 43. Karger Publishers, pp 252–259
Laine C, Harlin A, Hartman J, Hyvärinen S, Kammiovirta K, Krogerus B, Pajari H, Rautkoski H, Setälä H, Sievänen J, Uotila J, Vähä-Nissi M (2013) Hydroxy alkylate dxylans—their synthesis and application in coatings for packaging and paper. Ind Crops Prod 44:692–704
Lee DS, Hwang YI, Cho SH (1998) Developing antimicrobial packaging film for curled lettuce and soybean sprouts. Food Sci Biotechnol 7(2):117–121
Lei J, Yang L, Zhan Y, Wang Y, Ye T, Li Y, Deng H, Li B (2014) Plasma treated polyethylene terephthalate/polypropylene films assembled with chitosan and various preservatives for antimicrobial food packaging. Coll Surf B Bio interf 114:60–66
Liu H, Mu L, Tang J, Shen C, Gao C, Rong M, Lai R (2014) A potential wound healing-promoting peptide from frog skin. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 49:32–41
Liu H, Fengwei X, Long Y, Ling C, Lin L (2009) Thermal processing of starch-based polymers. Prog Polym Sci 34(12):1348–1368
López P, Sánchez C, Batlle R, Nerín C (2007) Development of flexible antimicrobial films using essential oils as active agents. J Agric Food Chem 55(21):8814–8824
Maki DG, Tambyah PA (2001) Engineering out the risk of infection with urinary catheters. Emerg Infect Dis 7:342–347
Malhotra B, Keshwani A, Kharkwal H (2015) Int J Pharm Pharmaceut Sci 7(4):10–18
Malhotra B, Keshwani A, Kharkwal H (2015) Antimicrobial food packaging: potential and pit falls. Front Microbiol 6:611
Manohar CM, Prabhawathi V, Sivakumar PM, Doble M (2015) Design of a papain immobilized antimicrobial food package with curcumin as a crosslinker. PloS One 10(4):e0121665. Medicine 339:2026–2027
Manukumar HM, Prathima VR, Sowmya S, Thribhuvan KR (2013) Study of nutritional quality, phytochemical constituents and antioxidant activities by different solvents of nettle (Urtica urens) From Madikeri-Karnataka State. Int Res J Pharmaceut Appl Sci 3(5):112–119
Manso S, Becerril R, Nerin C, Gomez-Lus R (2015) Influence of Ph and temperature variations on vapor phase action of an antifungal food packaging against five mold strains. Food Contr 47:20–26
Mensitieri G, Di Maio E, Buonocore GG, Nedi I, Oliviero M, Sansone L, Iannace S (2011) Processing and shelf life issues of selected food packaging materials and structures from renewable resources. Trends Food Sci Technol 22(2–3):72–80
Mitrus M, Wojtowicz A, Moscicki L (2009) Biodegradable polymers and their practical utility. In: Janssen LPBM, Moscicki L (eds) Thermoplastic starch: a green material for various industries. Wiley, Weinheim, Germany
Mochizuki M, Hirami M (1997) Structural effects on the biodegradation of aliphatic polyesters. Polym Adv Technol 8(4):203–209
Möller H, Grelier S, Pardon P, Coma V (2004) Antimicrobial and physicochemical properties of Chitosan–HPMC-based films. J Agric Food Chem 52(21):6585–6591
Nampoothiri MK, Nair NR, Rojan PJ (2010) An over view of the recent developments in polylactide (PLA) research. Biores Technol 101(22):8493–8501
Oussalah M, Caillet S, Salmiéri S, Saucier L, Lacroix M (2004) Antimicrobial and antioxidant effects of milk protein-based film containing essential oils for the preservation of whole beef muscle. J Agric Food Chem 52(18):5598–5605
Ozdemir M, Floros JD (2004) Active food packaging technologies. Crit Rev Food Sci 44:185–193
Park ES (2015) Antimicrobial polymeric materials for packaging applications: a review. The battle against microbial pathogens: basic science, technological advances and educational programs, 1
Pawar PA, Purwar Aachal H (2013) Biodegradable polymers in food packaging. Am J Eng Res 2(5):151–164
Peltzer M, Wagner J, Jiménez A (2009) Migration study of carvacrol as a natural antioxidant in high-density polyethylene for active packaging. Food Addit Contam 26(6):938–946
Pennisi E (2000) Geckos climb by the hairs of their toes. Science 288(5472):1717–1718
Pereirade Abreu DA, Cruz JM, Losada PP (2012) Active and intelligent packaging for food industry. Food Rev Int 28(2):146–187
Ponce AG, Roura SI, del Valle CE, Moreira MR (2008) Antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of edible coatings enriched with natural plant extracts: in vitro and in vivo studies. Postharvest Biol Technol 49(2):294–300
Pranoto Y, Rakshit SK, Salokhe VM (2005) Enhancing antimicrobial activity of chitosan films by incorporating garlic oil, potassium sorbate and nisin. LWT-Food Sci Technol 38(8):859–865
Quintavalla S, Vicini L (2002) Antimicrobial food packaging in Meat industry. Meat Sci 62:373–380
Randenburg J (2009) Modified atmospheric packaging. In: Yan KL (ed) The Wiley encyclopedia of packaging technology. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 787–794
Rhim JW, Park HM, Ha CS (2013) Bio-nanocomposites for food packaging applications. Prog Polym Sci 38:1629–1652
Robertson GL (2012) Food Packaging: principles and practices, 3rd edn. CRC Press-Taylor and Francis group, Boca Raton
Rojas-Graü MA, Avena-Bustillos RJ, Olsen C, Friedman M, Henika PR, Martín-Belloso O, Pan Z, McHugh TH (2007) Effects of plant essential oils and oil compounds on mechanical, barrier and antimicrobial properties of alginate–apple puree edible films. J Food Eng 81(3):634–641
Rooney ML (2005) Introduction to active food packaging. In: Han JH (ed) Innovations in food packaging. Elsevier ltd., London, pp 63–75
Rowe RC, Sheskey PJ, Owen SC (2006) Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients. Pharmaceutical Press
Ruban SW (2009) Biobased packaging—application in meat industry. Vet World 2(2):79–82
Rubio EM, Domingo R, Arenas JM, Gonzalez C (2004) Energetic analysis of drawing process by upper-bound techniques. J Mater Process Tech 155:1220–1226
Rutot D, Dubois P (2004) Les (bio) polymeres biodegradables: l’enjeu de demain? Chim Nouv 86:66–74
Sabde S, Bodiwala HS, Karmase A, Deshpande PJ, Kaur A, Ahmed N, Bhutani KK (2011) Anti-HIV activity of Indian medicinal plants. J Nat Med 65(3–4):662–669
Satyanarayana KG, Arizaga GG, Wypych F (2009) Biodegradable composites based on lignocellulosic fibers—an overview. Prog Polym Sci 34(9):982–1021
Sawant SN, Selvaraj V, Prabhawathi V, Doble M (2013) Antibiofilm properties of silver and gold incorporated PU, PCLm, PC and PMMA nanocomposites under two shear conditions. PLoS One 8(5):e63311
Scott G, Wiles DM (2001) Reviews programmed-life plastics from polyolefins: a new look at sustainability. Biomacromol 2(3):615–622
Scott G (2000) Greenpolymer. Polym Degrad Stab 68:1–7
Seydim AC, Sarikus G (2006) Antimicrobial activity of whey protein based edible films incorporated with oregano, rosemary and garlic essential oils. Food Res Int 39(5):639–644
Sodergard A, Stolt M (2002) Properties of lactic acid based polymers and their correlation with composition. Progr Polym Sci 27:1123–1163
Sun L, Sun J, Chen L, Niu P, Yang X, Guo Y (2017) Preparation and characterization of chitosan film incorporated with thinned young apple polyphenols as an active packaging material. Carbohydr Polym 163:81–91
Suppakul P, Miltz J, Sonneveld K, Bigger SW (2002) Preliminary study of antimicrobial films containing the principal constituents of basil. World Conference on Packaging: Proceedings of the 13th Intl. Assoc. of Packaging Res. Inst., Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, Mich., June 23–28. Fla.: CRC Press LLC. pp 834–839
Tang E, Cheng G, Ma X (2006) Preparation of nano-ZnO/PMMA composite particles via grafting of the copolymer onto the surface of zinc oxide nanoparticles. Powder Technol 161(3):209–214
Tokiwa Y, Suzuki T (1981) Hydrolysis of copolyesters containing aromatic and aliphatic ester blocks by lipase. J App Polym Sci 26(2):441–448
Tripathi S, Mehrotra GK, Dutta PK (2008) Chitosan based antimicrobial films for food packaging applications. e-Polymers 8(1):1082–1088 (ISSN1618-7229)
Valderrama Solano AC, de Rojas Gante C (2012) Food Bioprocess Technol 5:2522
Van Den Broek LAM, Knoop RJI, Kappen FHJ, Boeriu CG (2015) Chitosan films and blends for packaging material. Carbohydr Polym 116:237–242
Vert M (2002) Polymères de fermentation: Les poly (acide lactique) s et leurs précurseurs, les acides lactiques. L’Actualité chimique 11–12:79–82
Wang XX, Huang MY, Jiang YY (1992) Hydrogenation catalytic behaviors of palladium complexes of chitin and chitosan. In: Macromolecular symposia, vol. 59, no. 1. Hüthig & Wepf Verlag, pp 113–121
Weber CJ, Haugaard V, Festerson R, Bertelson G (2002) Production and applicationof biobased packaging material for food industry. Food Addit Contam 19:172–177
Willis D, Saidman S (2013) Botanical essential oils as natural food preservatives. In: 13th Annual Freshman Engineering Conference
Youssef AM, El-Sayed SM, El-Sayed HS, Salama HH, Dufresne A (2016) Enhancement of Egyptian soft white cheese shelf life using a novel chitosan/carboxymethyl cellulose/zinc oxide bionanocomposite film. Carbohydr Polym 151:9–19
Zhang X, Xiao G, Wang Y, Zhao Y, Su H, Tan T (2017) Preparation of chitosan-TiO2 composite film with efficient antimicrobial activities under visible light for food packaging applications. Carbohydr Polym 169:101–107
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ananda, A.P., Manukumar, H.M., Umesha, S. et al. A Relook at Food Packaging for Cost Effective by Incorporation of Novel Technologies. J Package Technol Res 1, 67–85 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41783-017-0011-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41783-017-0011-4