Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Holistic End-to-End Prescriptive Maintenance Framework

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Data-Enabled Discovery and Applications

Abstract

The concept of equipment maintenance is older than the industrial revolution. The mode, medium, and timing of maintenance during equipment life cycle have evolved from reactive maintenance to predictive maintenance to prescriptive maintenance. Prescriptive maintenance, which incorporates the Internet of Things, digitization, and artificial intelligence, has the potential to greatly improve upon proactive maintenance. The growth in applications based on prescriptive maintenance has been exponential. However existing solutions are piecemeal and lack complete solutions to keep equipment operating at optimal cost. We propose a Holistic end-to-end Prescriptive Maintenance Framework (HeePMF) that uses maintenance needs analysis, equipment, and operational data with predictive technologies and feedback to generate actionable insights. Other features implemented are personnel scheduling, supply chain improvement, field-replaceable unit (FRU) management, process improvement, and knowledge management. The working of framework (HeePMF) is demonstrated using datasets from the 2019 HACKtheMACHINE Data Science Competition. The implementation demonstrates data integration, selection of few critical discriminants using feature reduction, missing dataset computation, and noise removal. It ulilizes and demonstrates predictive algorithms to determine sub-components for impending failures at individual equipment and fleet levels, and then providing mechanism for complete repair solutions (FRUs order, service personnel scheduling, equipment downtime management). Steps like service personnel optimal deployment are implemented using a simulated dataset. This HeePMF is extensible and makes it truly prescriptive, resulting in a much reduced unplanned equipment downtime at optimal cost. This paper successfully defines extensible end-to-end holistic prescriptive equipment maintenance framework with optimal cost and demonstrates with a very thorough case study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Data Availability

The data was available at https://www.hackthemachine.ai/track2 when experiments were conducted during the month of February 2020 .

References

  1. F. Ansari, R. Glawar, T. Nemeth, PriMa: a prescriptive maintenance model for cyber-physical production systems, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 32(4–5), 482–503 (2019).

  2. F. Ansari, R. Glawar, W. Sihn, Prescriptive Maintenance of CPPS by Integrating Multimodal Data with Dynamic Bayesian Networks. Machine Learning for Cyber Physical Systems, Technologies for Intelligent Automation), vol 11. (Springer Vieweg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2019), pp. 1–8.

  3. Fiix Software, Run-to-failure-maintenance (n.d.), https://www.fiixsoftware.com/run-to-failure-maintenance, Accessed 4 Jan 2020

  4. iOffice, Preventive Maintenanc Vs. Predictive Maintenance: What’s the difference? (n.d.), https://www.maintenanceconnection.com/website/preventive-vs-predictive-maintenance-taking-facility-next-step/ , Accessed 6 Jan 2020.

  5. J. Han, M. Kamber, J Pei, Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques, 3rd Edition,Morgan Kaufmann (2011).

  6. Sparcognition, predictive-prescriptive-maintenance-why-enterprise-should-know-difference (2020), https://www.sparkcognition.com/predictive-prescriptive-maintenance-why-enterprise-should-know-difference/, Accessed 10 Jan 2020

  7. P. Ceravolo, F. Zavatarelli, Knowledge acquisition in process intelligence, 2015 International conference on information and communication technology research (ICTRC), (2015), pp. 218–221.

  8. R. Soltanpoor, T. Sellis, Prescriptive Analytics for Big Data, Databases Theory and Applications: 27th Australasian Database Conference, ADC 2016, (Sydney, NSW, 2016), pp. 245–256.

  9. A. Aamodt, E. Plaza, Case-based reasoning foundational issues, methodical variations and system approaches, Artificial Intelligence Communications, 7(1), 39–59 (1994).

  10. R. Accorsia, R. Manzinia, P. Pascarellab, P. Patellab, S. Sass, Data mining and Machine Learning for condition-based maintenance, Procedia. Manuf. 11, 1153–1161 (2017).

  11. A. Bousdekis, N. Papageorgiou, B. Magoutas, D. Apostolou, G. Mentzas, Enabling condition-based maintenance decisions with proactive event-driven computing,  Comput. Ind. 100, 173–183 (2018).

  12. A. Bousdekis, B. Magoutas, D. Apostolou, G. Mentzas, Review, analysis and synthesis of prognostic-based decision support methods for condition based maintenance. J. Intell. Manuf. 29, 1303–1316 (2018).

  13. K. Lepenioti, B.D. Alexandros Apostolou, G. Menzas, Prescriptive analytics: Literature review and research challenges, Int. J. Inf. Manag. 50, 57–70 (2020).

  14. K. Lepeniotia, A. Bousdekisa, D. Apostolouab, G. Mentzasa, Prescriptive analytics: A Surveyof approaches and methodsBIS 2018: International Conference on Business Information Systems. 339, 449–460 (2018)

  15. D. Belyia, E. Popovaa, D.P. Mortonb, P. Damien, Bayesian failure-rate modeling and preventive maintenance optimization, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 262(3), 1085–1093 (2017).

  16. C. Franciosi, A. Lambiase, S. Miranda, Sustainable maintenance: A periodic preventive maintenance model with sustainable spare parts management, IFAC-PapersOnLine. 50(1), 13692–13697 (2017).

  17. R. Ruschel, E.A.P. Santos, E.D. Freitas, L. Louresc, Mining shop-floor data for preventive maintenance management: Integrating probabilistic and predictive models, Procedia. Manuf. 11, 1127–1134 (2017).

  18. D. Zühlke, SmartFactory – A Vision Becomes Reality, Proceedings of the 17thWorld Congress IFAC’08, Seoul, Korea, 42(4), 31–39 (2009).

  19. K. Matyas, T. Nemeth, K. Kovacs, R. Glawar, A procedural approach for realizing prescriptive maintenance planning in manufacturing industries, CIRP Annals. 66(1), 461–464 (2017).

  20. R. Glawar, C. Habersohn, T. Nemeth, K. Matyas, B. Kittl, W. Sihn, A Holistic Approach for Anticipative Maintenance Planning Supported by A Dynamic Calculation of Wear Reserve, Journal of Maintenance Engineering. 1, 313–324 (2016).

  21. L. Berk, D. Bertsimas, A.M. Weinstein, J. Yan, Prescriptive analytics for human resource planning in the professional services industry, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 272(2), 636–641 (2019).

  22. J. Beyerer, A. Maier, O. Niggemann (eds.), Machine learning for cyber physical systems. Technologien für die intelligente Automation, Technologies for Intelligent Automation, 65(2), 621-641 (2019).

  23. S. Akter, R. Bandara, U. Hani, S.F. Wamba, C. Foropon, T. Papadopoulos, Analytics-based decision-making for service systems: A qualitative study and agenda for future research, Int. J. Inf. Manag. 48, 85–95 (2019).

  24. D. Bumblauskas, D. Gemmill, A. Igou, J. Anzengruber, Smart Maintenance Decision Support Systems (SMDSS) Based on Corporate Big Data Analytics, Expert Syst. Appl. 90, 303–317 (2017).

  25. J. Sinha, A. Yunusa-Kaltungo, W. Hahn, A holistic approach for anticipative maintenance planning supported by a dynamic calculation of wear reserve, IncoME-I 2016 (1nd International Conference on Maintenance Engineering), Manchester; August 2016. 1,  313–324 (2016).

  26. I. D. J. Kelleher, B. Mac Namee, A. D’Arcy, “Fundamentals of Machine Learning for Predictive Data Analytics: Algorithms, Worked Examples, and Case Studies”, 2015, 1–3, 12–15, 17, 117, 153–158, 179, 247, 323. Cambridge, USA: MIT Press

  27. D. Belyi, E. Popova, D.P. Morton, P. Damien, Bayesian Failure Rate Modeling and Preventive Maintenance Optimization, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 262(3), 1085–1093 (2017).

  28. D. Yuan, J.S. Edwards, Y.K. Dwivedi, Artificial intelligence for decision making in the era of big data–evolution, challenges and research agenda, Int. J. Inf. Manag. 48, 63–71 (2019).

  29. D. Kumar, B. Klefsjö, Proportional hazards model: A review, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 44(2), 177–188 (1994).

  30. N. Stein, J. Meller, C.M. Flath, Big Data on the Shop-floor: Towards Sensor-Based Decision-Support for Manual Processes, J. Bus. Econ. 88(1), 593–616 (2018).

  31. A. Chalamalla, I. F. Ilyas, M. Ouzzani, P. Papotti, Descriptive and prescriptive data cleaning, Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGMOD international conference on management of data, 445–456 (2014).

  32. Z. Li, S. Zhou, C. Sievenpiper, S. Choubey, Statistical Monitoring of Time-to-Failure Data Using Rank Tests, Quality Reliability Engineering 28(3), 321–333 (2012).

  33. X. Deng, Y. Yao, J. Chen, Y. Lin, "Combining breadth-first with depth-first search algorithms for VLSI wire routing," 2010 3rd International Conference on Advanced Computer Theory and \(ICACTE), Chengdu (2010), pp. 482–486

  34. R. Zhou, E.A. Hansen, Combining Breadth-First and Depth-First Strategies in Searching for Treewidth, Proceedings of the Twenty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-09), pp. 162–168 (2009).

  35. Z. Li, S. Zhou, S. Choubey, C. Sievenpiper, Failure event prediction using the Cox proportional hazard model driven by frequent failure signatures, IEEE Transaction, 39(3), pp. 303–315 (2007).

  36. Z. Li, S. Zhou, C. Sievenpiper, S. Choubey, "Change Detection in the Cox Proportional Hazards Models from Different Reliability Data", Quality Reliability Engineering, volume 26(7), pp. 677–689 (2010).

  37. A. Kaur, P. Sharma, A. Verma, "A appraisal paper on Breadth-first search, Depth-first search and Red black tree", International Journal of Scientific Research Publications, volume 4, issue 3, pp. 1-3 (2014).

  38. HachTheMachine: Track 2 Data Science – Cleared for Takeoff (2019), https://www.hackthemachine.ai/track2/, Accessed 4 Feb 2020.

  39. S. Old, K. Esbenson, P. Geladi, Principal component analysis, proceedings of multivariate statistical Worshop for geologists and geochemists, 2(1–3), 37–52 (1987).

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for the comments and suggestions.

Code Availability

The code is not available.

Funding

This work was conducted as part of the authors’ normal duties at the University of South Alabama.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suresh Choubey.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article belongs to the Topical Collection: Data-Enabled Discovery for Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems

Guest Editor: Raju Gottumukkala

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choubey, S., Benton, R.G. & Johnsten, T. A Holistic End-to-End Prescriptive Maintenance Framework. Data-Enabled Discov. Appl. 4, 11 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41688-020-00045-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41688-020-00045-z

Keywords

Navigation