Abstract
This study explored the relationship between community participation/community attachment and subjective well-being (SWB) among Japanese older adults. The study was conducted in Japanese urban (Tokyo and Osaka) and rural (Shikoku region) areas. Structural equation modelling was performed to assess the potential relationship between community participation, community attachment and SWB. Results showed that community participation and community attachment were positively associated in both areas. However, community attachment had a significant impact on SWB only in rural areas with little impact on increasing SWB in urban areas. We conclude that the role of community attachment varies according to regions with different socioeconomic properties. These findings contribute to the design of detailed region-specific initiatives to improve SWB of older adults.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
The positive aspects of human psychology in promoting the health of older adults have been widely discussed, with the aim of a more fulfilling life from the perspective of lifelong development. Hence, it became necessary to elucidate the psychosocial factors that lead to this need. Subjective well-being (SWB) is a broad concept that includes emotional states, satisfaction with specific areas such as family and work, and satisfaction with life in general (Diener et al. 1999; Maddux 2018; Vallejos and Despott 2019). Studies have investigated the measure of SWB and explored enhancers in the context of health promotion. They figured out that personal and social factors act on SWB, for example, health, income, occupation, and so on (Pontin et al. 2013; Gaspar and Balancho 2017). Those are applied as indicators to increase well-being.
An approach to fostering those among older adults focuses on feelings of control and expectancies. Increased control over, and responsibility for, important outcomes in communities or networks results in higher levels of happiness. Expanding the social networks of older adults, such as allowing them to make more friends and communicate more with friends and family, improve their SWB (Wang 2016). For example, local festivals and sports teams influence community attachment and strengthen SWB through residents’ cocreation and community belonging (Chou et al. 2018; Kim et al. 2019). Although there are few studies on the mechanisms of SWB and community attachment in the elderly, related studies suggest that community attachment improves satisfaction with the community environment, community relationships, and perceived security, and has a positive effect on SWB (Lai et al. 2021; Layera et al. 2020; Taniguchi and Portter 2016; Toikko and Pehkonen 2018). Studies have indicated that community attachment is closely associated with self-perceived mental health (Vallejos and Despott 2019; Lee and Blanchard 2012; Yeo et al. 2022). Positive psychological states could mediate SWB and community attachment. Feeling a sense of belonging and involvement in the community during newly experienced activities could increase the level of confidence and satisfaction.
Another aspect of SWB is to be influenced by a number of factors including the built environment and socio-economic factors (Williams and Kitchen 2012). Subsequently, the relationship between community attachment and SWB could differ in regions possibly influenced by region-specific socio-economic factors. However, there is a lack of studies to pay attention to the regional difference in the relationship between community attachment and SWB for older adults and the mechanism of those. Although the literature concerning the effect of residential environment on SWB and mental health (Francis et al. 2012; Phillips et al. 2005) or the mediating effect of social connectedness and involvement to SWB (Lee et al. 2008; Lv and Xie 2017) are accumulating, there are much fewer empirical studies examining the contribution of community attachment to SWB and psychological mechanisms of community participation, community attachment toward SWB for the older adults, and those regional variances. Especially in Japan, where the aging rate exceeds 21% and which is referred to as a ‘super-aging society’, the older adults’ health and welfare are major concerns. In efforts aimed at promoting longer and healthier lives, the Japanese government recently decided that increasing community activities among older adults is a policy priority (MHLW 2017). Given the retirement and physical limitation of older adults, the community has gradually become the center of their daily lives and communication. It is thought that physical enhancement and psychological stability consisting of experience through community activities and community attachment can have a positive impact on SWB of the elderly and, by extension, contribute to extending the healthy life expectancy of older adults (De Leon et al. 1999; Kelly 2013; Kwon et al. 2019; Kobayashi et al. 2020). Therefore, it is important to explore the influence of community participation and community attachment to SWB of older adults to provide care services to address these concerns. However, extant studies related to SWB and community attachment for older adults remain relatively deficient.
This study focused on the influence of the participation in community activities and community attachment as a means of enhancing SWB. In particular, it was assumed that the relationship among ‘community participation’, ‘community attachment’, and ‘SWB’ might differ depending on the regional environment owing to the implementation status of community activities, relationship with neighbors, and efforts by local governments for aging measures. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the relationship among four dimensions: ‘community attachment’, ‘community participation’, and ‘SWB’, compared it between urban and rural areas, and explored ways to enhance well-being of older adults in each area. It would offer information which contributes to the older adults' welfare policy decision.
2 Literature review and hypothesis
2.1 Community participation and community attachment
Community attachment describes a sense of support for a community, formed through shared experiences with others in daily life, and a mindset that aims for the future of the community (Omori et al. 2014). It is a comprehensive concept that includes connectedness with neighbors (Eisenhauer et al. 2000; Raymond et al. 2010), sense of belongingness or involvement (Escalera-Reyes 2020; Esters et al. 2022; Schellenberg et al. 2018), pride in being a resident (Fiser and Kozuh 2019; Magno and Dossena 2020) and so on. Community participation is defined as engagement in activities occurring outside the home and interacting with others in the community. Given community participation are critical for older adults to develop abilities, promote health, and prevent disabilities (Gough et al. 2021), community organizations, healthcare professionals and municipalities have delivered community activities targeting the participation of older adults. Older adults are encouraged to participate in various community activities, such as involving in residential community groups, volunteering, participating in local events, and so on.
Community participation brings emotional connections and further develops community attachment (Manzo and Perkins 2006). In community participation, older adults connect with their neighbors and feel a sense of belonging. It improves functional ability and mental health. These positive experiences should be closely related with community attachment. Mutually, community attachment enhances community participation (Kim et al. 2022). Feeling a sense of belonging and cohesion would convert to act for a community. For example, community cohesion increases the willingness to participate in community activities, such as cooperation in tourism (Orgaz-Agüera et al. 2022). This cycle can occur repeatedly through interactions between community participation and community attachment.
H1
Community participation and community attachment interacts each other.
2.2 Community attachment and subjective well-being
Subjective well-being (SWB) is attracting wide attention in fields such as policy evaluation and development economics (Das et al. 2020). In Japan, where the aging population is advancing at an unprecedented rate coupled with the declining birthrate, the purpose of the system has changed greatly from ‘long–term care’ to ‘prevention’ after the revision of the Long–term Care Insurance Law. Hence, prefectures and municipalities have put SWB as one of the policy indicators of the long–term vision and are using it for local government management. Many municipalities have begun to measure SWB of the older adults prior to the formulation of long–term Care Insurance Plan. It assumes SWB as a driving force that encourages actions that lead to preventive care. Therefore, understanding the factors that enhance SWB and working on them are measures for encouraging older adults to take preventive care. Furthermore, even if the household composition, financial situation, and physical condition cannot be changed, there is room for interaction and social participation to be changed by the behavior of the older adults themselves. By preventing the decline in SWB in old age, it becomes easier to take positive actions that lead to care prevention, interactions, and better physical and mental health. The Japanese government is promoting and subsidizing senior citizens' clubs that are conducting community activities so that the older adults themselves can find a role in society and actively participate in society (MHLW 2017). Municipalities also support volunteer activities to older adults. Through participation in such activities, they can obtain SWB by satisfying various aspects of physical, mental, and social aspects. (Litwin 2000; Zhang and Zhang 2015).
H2
Community attachment affects subjective well-being.
The conceptual model regarding SWB of the elders regarding community attachment, and community participation was built as follows (Fig. 1). To see the regional differences, two conceptual models of urban and rural regions were compared.
3 Materials and methods
3.1 Target area and sample
To compare different socioeconomic regions, we separated the survey area into urban and rural areas. Tokyo and Osaka prefectures were selected as urban areas, and four prefectures in Shikoku were selected as rural areas. Data were collected using a questionnaire survey via the Internet from anonymous individuals aged over 60 from 24 to 25 September 2021. Respondents were briefed on the study and considered subject consent of participation before beginning their responses. An online survey was designated to only respondents with subject consent to participate in the survey. Of the total samples collected, 111 were from urban areas and 116 were from rural areas. The number of total samples is 227. Based on the regulation of Ethics Committee of Tokyo University of Science, survey research only including questions about psychological trauma is subject to review by Ethics Committee, this work does not require review or approval by Ethics Committee and informed consent.
An urban area is an area where commerce, culture, and distribution are developed, and human concentration is high. Tokyo and Osaka, which have the largest populations and average annual incomes in Japan, can be considered urban areas with well–developed commerce and other activities. The aging rate is relatively low at 23.1% and 27.6% in Tokyo and Osaka, respectively, due to the large number of young people moving in. However, in the four prefectures of the Shikoku region, the average population of each prefecture does not reach 1 million, and although the number of older adult people is small, the aging rate is higher than 30.0% (Cabinet Office 2020). The employment rate of the primary industry is higher than the national average, thus, agriculture is flourishing in such regions.
To distinguish between the socioeconomic characteristics of respondents in the urban and rural areas of the target regions, personal attributes such as age, gender, occupation, area and duration of residence, family structure, subjective sense of health status, and household income were asked and subjected to χ2 tests (Table 1). There was a significant difference with residence (< 0.001) and household income (< 0.005). Regarding residence, while both regions are dominated by residential area, Shikoku has a relatively large number of farming and mountainous areas. There are relatively many low–income households with household income of less than 2 million yen in Shikoku region, and many high–income households with 10 million yen or more in Tokyo and Osaka. In both regions, the male ratio of respondents was high at 70% or more in terms of gender, and although there was no significant difference in age, the older adults in rural area were slightly younger. Nearly half the respondents are laborers. There are many older adults who have lived for more than 25 years in rural areas and have lived for a long time on average. Most households comprised a married couple family, with no children, followed by couples with unmarried children, and those living alone. In terms of the subjective sense of health, the most common answer was ‘healthy’ in both regions (Table 1).
3.2 Measures
The questionnaire items were developed (Okamoto et al. 2005; Kasejimai et al. 2015; Aoyagi 2017) and validated in the preliminary questionnaire survey. Preliminary questionnaire survey was conducted for 52 respondents from 5 to 8 October 2021. The items consist of three dimensions and related questions: willingness to participate in local communities, community attachment, and subjective well-being (SWB) (Table 2). The items should all measure the same thing, so they should be correlated with one another. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of internal consistency of each dimension was estimated and regarded as satisfactory (α > 0.8).
The reliability coefficient α showed > 0.800 values for community attachment, community participation, and SWB in both regions (Table 2).
3.3 Structural equation modelling
To examine SWB process that is driven by community attachment and willingness to participate in local communities, a scheme via structural equation modelling (SEM) was elaborated. SEM has become a useful technique in social sciences research to analyze the relationship between latent variables (Mueller and Hancock 2010). Latent variables were set as ‘community attachment’, ‘community participation’, and ‘SWB’. Based on the hypothesis model (Fig. 1), SEM was performed using IBM SPSS Amos27 (SPSS Inc., Armonk, USA).
4 Results
4.1 Community attachment and subjective well-being model
Regarding urban areas, the goodness of fit of the model is RMSEA = 0.086, CFI = 0.960, both of which meet the standard values, thus, the verified hypothetical model is suitable for the data. There is a significant influence of 0.707 (< 0.001) between ‘community attachment’ and ‘community participation’, but the relationship between ‘community attachment’ and ‘subjective well-being (SWB)’ (0.003, p = 0.985) was not significant. It suggested that ‘community attachment’ would have little effect on increasing ‘SWB’ in urban areas (Fig. 2).
In rural areas, there is a significant correlation between ‘community attachment’ and ‘community participation’ (0.551, < 0.001), ‘community attachment’ and ‘SWB’ (0.597, < 0.001). The goodness of fit of the model is RMSEA = 0.036, CFI = 0.996, which showed relatively low. It may be attributed to the integration of data with different tendencies. This suggests that ‘community attachment’ could have a significant influence on enhancing ‘SWB’ in rural areas (Fig. 3).
In both urban and rural areas, the overall relationship among latent variables is similar to that of rural areas. ‘community attachment’ and ‘community participation’ was closely related to each other (0.692, < 0.001). Community attachment positively influenced SWB (0.623, < 0.001). The goodness of fit of the model is RMSEA = 0.0.96, CFI = 0.964, which showed relatively low. It may be attributed to the integration of data with different tendencies (Fig. 4).
5 Discussion
5.1 Community attachment and subjective well-being
People develop a type of attachment to the community to which they belong that involves emotional connections with and intense caring for the community. These emotional attachments have been often estimated empirically and contributing factors were explored (Cheng et al. 2021; Kim and Park 2018; Kwon et al. 2019). Especially, participation in community activities is a strong enhancer in raising community attachment. Community activities encompass a wide range of actions involving a community. These activities include engaging in community self-governance, such as actively exchanging opinions on community development and regional policies, participating in voting, and taking part in initiatives like environmental volunteering and health promotion. By engaging in these activities, individuals have the opportunity to deepen their understanding of the community and cultivate a sense of attachment to it. On one hand, community attachment could enhance participation in community activities and events (Kim et al. 2022; Orgaz-Agüera et al. 2022). Since the initial study on community attachment by Kasarda and Janowitz in 1974, which found a positive relationship between the length of residence and level of community participation, this topic has been widely discussed (Kasarda and Janowitz 1974). Community attachment often transforms into positive perceptions, emotions, and behaviors toward the community (Twigger-Ross and Uzzell 1996; Altman and Low 2012; Zwiers et al. 2018; Chang et al. 2022). It was revealed consistently in this study that community attachment and participation showed positively correlated.
Moreover, it is possible for an individual to form a network within a community by reducing the distance between people who participate in the community together with them, and it is thought that the change of emotions and a sense of belonging within the network will extend to the attachment to the community. Empirical studies elucidated that there is a positive impact of community attachment on SWB (Powdthavee 2008; Tsurumi et al. 2019). Older adults also have shown community attachment via community participation, which is further linked to subjective well-being (SWB) (Strommen and Sanders 2018). Results in the current study suggested consistently that community participation and community attachment are associated with SWB of seniors. Positive psychological states involved in community attachment such as a sense of belonging, good relationships in the community, satisfaction to contribute to community development, and so on (Kelly 2013; Kim et al. 2022), further seemingly influence SWB.
5.2 Regional variation of the role of the community attachment in subjective well-being
Regional variations in happiness and well-being have been often discussed considering neighborhood and community environments (Conigliaro 2022; Hitokoto et al. 2014; Rodríguez-Pose and von Berlepsch 2014). In this study, we focused on community attachment as one of the major factors to influence subjective well-being (SWB) and drive the regional variance of the same. For urban areas, there were no significant paths of community attachment to SWB. Only community attachment and community participation were significant. As the relationship between community attachment and SWB was not significant, attachment to the residential area would hardly be the major factor for increasing SWB for older adults in urban areas.
This finding suggests a couple of explanations regarding influential factors of SWB among urban seniors. Urban seniors would possess more plausible factors than community participation or community attachment to influence SWB. Previous studies have stated the effectiveness of individual approaches to enhance SWB other than increasing participation in community activities. Yasunaga et al. (2002) analyzed factors affecting SWB of the older adults in urban areas in Japan and concluded that exercise habits are particularly important. Exercise practice is known to strengthen more functional skills and contribute to the performance of activities of daily living, greater subjective satisfaction, and increased well-being (De Souza et al. 2018; Parra-Rizo and Sanchis-Soler 2020). Meanwhile, less physical activity than in rural areas may have highlighted the impact of exercise on the well-being of older people in urban areas (Lee and Um 2021; Robertson et al. 2018). Another point of view is seemingly the difference in the range of social relations in working, hobby groups, and so on. Concerned that urban public transportation is convenient and access to certain places is well structured, older adults have a greater range of activities. More urban seniors are working in the office and need to commute away from their residential areas, on the other hand, those in rural areas are working more in agricultural sectors which are mostly located near their residential areas (Cabinet office 2021). Urban seniors often commute or participate in groups/activities away from their residential places, the chance to participate in community activities and raise community attachment might be less. These findings suggest that for older adults residing in urban areas, personal care such as exercise or diversified social relation may be a priority factor associated with SWB, rather than neighborhood or community.
On one hand, a possible explanation is that the relatively lower SWB of elders in urban than in rural could cause the disconnection between community attachment and SWB. Studies have compared urban–rural differences and showed low subjective QOL or SWB in urban contexts and much higher well-being in urban (Campanera and Higgins 2011; Davern and Chen 2010; Wang and Fowler 2019). Given the consistent trend in Japan (Kshita et al. 2021), it might be difficult to find a significant path from community attachment to SWB because SWB is relatively low.
In rural areas, community attachment and SWB were significantly related. There is relatively abundant community involvement in rural areas that older adults can take the initiative in, which not only provides employment support but also a place for social participation, leading to securing income, purpose of life, friend-making, and maintaining and improving health. Community participation was indirectly associated to SWB via community attachment, suggesting that there is a tendency to lower anxiety when the connection with the neighboring community is strong in rural areas, where they are relatively vulnerable to natural disasters (Lee and Fraser 2019). Concerned that there are many challenges such as a shortage of human resources and reduced demand for nursing and medical services, people tend to value not only ‘self-help’ and ‘public assistance’ but also ‘mutual assistance’, that is, cooperation and help from the people around them. Such awareness of interpersonal relationships with neighboring residents is the community attachment of older adults in rural areas. Through community attachment, they feel well-being.
5.3 Theoretical and practical implications
The current study is one of few explorations that examine the relationships between ‘community attachment’, ‘community participation’, and ‘subjective well-being (SWB)’ among Japanese older adults and that point out the distinctions in regional variations of the same. First, despite considerable findings that have demonstrated the positive effect of willingness to participate in local community activities on community attachment, few studies consider its sequential positive role toward SWB. In most cases, motivation to participate in local community activities is a critical factor that directly determined the community attachment. In turn, community attachment also influences community participation (Kim et al. 2022). Subsequently, community attachment influences an older adults’ SWB through individuals’ psychological processes. This means that community attachment raises SWB as a means of giving decision–making autonomy, independence, satisfaction, and achievement, among others, through daily activities of older adults. Second, community attachment positively influences SWB in rural areas, but not in urban areas. Results indicated that regional characteristics could drive differences in the role of community attachment as a trigger of SWB. For example, there are relatively physically intensive community activities, which is a major part of the daily life of rural older adults. On the other hand, in urban areas, individual activities are more abundant than community activities.
These findings have practical implications. First, municipalities or community administrators should fully consider social communication and the design of community activities. During a community activity design phase, policymakers and stakeholders should carefully consider the regional characteristics and the regional specific preference of community activities in maintaining or enhancing the quality of life of older adults. Second, especially in urban areas, given the weak role of community attachment, implementation of community activities alone is not sufficient for enhancing SWB. Community administrators should adopt proper measures to cultivate older adults’ satisfaction with community activities and strengthen the relationship between community attachment and SWB.
5.4 Limitations and future scope
The following limitations exist in the current study. The theoretical model explored in this study remains to be tested. First, target areas were limited to a couple of prefectures in Japan, Shikoku regions for rural and both Tokyo and Osaka for urban. Although the regional characteristics were clarified to represent urban and rural areas by using regression analysis, respectively, it remains to test whether to generalize the findings for older adults through Japan in future study. Second, because the survey in this study used an online research tool, the target population was limited to those who have or can handle electronic devices such as computers and tablets. This inevitably led to an increase in the proportion of those who live with family members and are proficient in handling electronic terminals and a slight decrease in the data for the older adults who live alone. It is necessary to prevent bias in the characteristics of the target population by having the survey mailed to them. Furthermore, this study suggested that community attachment affects SWB in rural areas and not in urban areas. As the next step, it is necessary to clarify the factors that influence the community attachment of the older adults in rural areas and the factors that strongly influence the SWB of the older adults in urban areas, respectively. By doing so, it is possible to narrow down the focus points of each local government's efforts to improve SWB.
6 Conclusions
This study targeted older adults living in urban areas and rural areas in Japan, and explored the relationship between community attachment, community participation, and subjective well-being (SWB). The elderly of the rural area could acquire SWB from community attachment and active participation in community activities. However, in urban areas, the relationship between them was not that significant. In urban areas, a sense of security in life is provided by other factors but community attachment such as well-developed public transportation systems, medical facilities, and nursing care facilities is seemingly considered to be linked to SWB. Conversely, in rural areas, there is a strong spirit of mutual aid, in which neighbors help each other resolve concerns and risks in their daily lives, and it is thought that fostering relationships with others is associated with SWB.
Data availability
Data is avaiable in seo, yuna (2022), Community attachment as a factor in the subjective well–being of the older adults in urban and rural Japan, Dryad, Dataset. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.ht76hdrkj.
References
Altman I, Low SM (eds) (2012) Place attachment, vol 12. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin
Aoyagi R (2017) Exploratory analysis of factors that determine place attachment and ties with a region. Shukutoku University Graduate School of Integrated Human and Social Welfare Studies Bulletin, vol 24, pp 25–42. Available online: https://shukutoku.repo.nii.ac.jp/?action=pages_view_mainandactive_action=repository_view_main_item_detailanditem_id=1704anditem_no=1andpage_id=13andblock_id=21. Accessed 7 July 2021 (in Japanese)
Cabinet Office (2020) Annual Report on the Aging Society. Available online: https://www8.cao.go.jp/kourei/whitepaper/w-2020/html/zenbun/index.html (accessed on 23 Sep 2021)
Cabinet Office (2021) Survey on the daily life and community participation of the older adults in FY 2021. https://www8.cao.go.jp/kourei/ishiki/r03/zentai/pdf_index.html (in Japanese)
Campanera JM, Higgins P (2011) Quality of life in urban–classified and rural–classified English local authority areas. Environ Plan A 43:683–702. https://doi.org/10.1068/a43450
Chang KC, Chen HS, Hsieh CM (2022) Effects of relational capital on relationship between place attachment and resident participation. J Commun Appl Soc Psychol 32(1):19–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2531
Cheng X, Zhong W, Li D (2021) Urban neighborhood self–governance and community attachment: evidence from southwest China. Cities 112:103128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103128
Chou CY, Huang SC, Mair JA (2018) Transformative service view on the effects of festivalscapes on local residents’ subjective well-being. Event Manag 22(3):405–422. https://doi.org/10.3727/152599518x15258072560248
Conigliaro P (2022) Subjective well-being in Italian regions. Soc Indic Res 161(2–3):751–781. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02391-y
Das KV, Jones-Harrell C, Fan Y, Ramaswami A, Orlove B, Botchwey N (2020) Understanding subjective well-being: perspectives from psychology and public health. Public Health Rev 41(1):1–32
Davern MT, Chen X (2010) Piloting the geographic information system (GIS) methodology as an analytic tool for subjective wellbeing research. Appl Res Qual Life 5:105–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-010-9095-5
De Leon CFM, Glass TA, Beckett LA, Seeman TE, Evans DA, Berkman LF (1999) Social networks and disability transitions across eight intervals of yearly data in the New Haven EPESE. J Gerontol Ser B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 54(3):S162–S172. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/54B.3.S162
De Souza LNN, De Carvalho PHB, Ferreira MEC (2018) Quality of life and subjective well-being of physically active older adults people: a systematic review. J Phys Educ Sport 18:1615–1623
Diener E, Suh EM, Lucas RE, Smith HL (1999) Subjective well-being: three decades of progress. Psychol Bull 125:276–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276
Eisenhauer BW, Krannich RS, Blahna DJ (2000) Attachments to special places on public lands: an analysis of activities, reason for attachments, and community connections. Soc Nat Resour 13:421–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/089419200403848
Escalera-Reyes J (2020) Place attachment, feeling of belonging and collective identity in socio-ecological systems: study case of Pegalajar (Andalusia–Spain). Sustainability 12(8):3388. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083388
Esters P, Godor BP, Van der Hallen R (2022) Investigating the role of residential migration history on the relationship between attachment and sense of belonging: a SEM approach. J Commun Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22918
Fiser SZ, Kozuh I (2019) The impact of cultural events on community reputation and pride in Maribor, The European Capital of Culture 2012. Soc Indic Res 142:1055–1073. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-1958-4
Francis J, Giles-Corti B, Wood L, Knuiman M (2012) Creating sense of community: the role of public space. J Environ Psychol 32:401–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.07.002
Gaspar T, Balancho L (2017) Personal and social factors that influence subjective well-being: socioeconomic differences. Cien Saude Colet 22(4):1373–1389
Gough C, Lewis LK, Barr C, Maeder A, George S (2021) Community participation of community dwelling older adults: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 21(1):1–13
Hitokoto H, Takahashi Y, Kaewpijit J (2014) Happiness in Thailand: variation between urban and rural regions. Psychologia 57:229–244. https://doi.org/10.2117/psysoc.2014.229
Kasarda JD, Janowitz M (1974) Community attachment in mass society. Am Sociol Rev 328–339. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2094293.pdf. Accessed 3 Aug 2022
Kasejima T, Tadaka E, Taguchi R, Arimoto A, Dai Y, Imamatsu Y (2015) Subjective well-being and related factors for healthy longevity among community dwelling older adults people. Jpn Acad Commun Health Nurs 17:23–29. https://doi.org/10.2074/jachn.17.3_23
Kelly DC (2013) Community attachment, religious participation, and quality of life satisfaction among adults involved in civic participation. J Hum Behav Soc Environ 23:561–572. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2013.765821
Kim B, Park J (2018) Effects of commercial activities by type on social bonding and place attachment in neighborhoods. Sustainability 10:1771. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061771
Kim YD, Magnusen MJ, Weaver A, Kim M (2019) Rural community well-being through minor league sport. Sport Bus Manag Int J 9(4):328–343. https://doi.org/10.1108/sbm-10-2018-0092
Kim DJ, Salvacion M, Salehan M, Kim DW (2022) An empirical study of community cohesiveness, community attachment, and their roles in virtual community participation. Eur J Inform Syst. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2021.2018364
Kobayashi R, Nomura M, Kobayashi N (2020) Factors associated with the maintenance and decline of instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) among community-dwelling elderly people in Japan: a systematic review of observational studies. J Jpn Acad Health Sci 23(2):60–74. https://doi.org/10.24531/jhsaiih.23.2_60
Kshita R, Nagaki K, Ishizuki C, Miyaguchi H (2021) The relationship between subjective well-being, activity participation status, and basic attributes in community-dwelling older adults. OT 40:34–41. https://doi.org/10.32178/jotr.40.1_34 (in Japanese)
Kwon M, Lee C, Xiao Y, McIntosh WA (2019) Community currency activities, community attachment, and quality of life: a case study of the Crooked River Alliance of TimeBanks. Time Soc 28:1181–1220. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X17716737
Lai SL, Zhou YQ, Yuan Y (2021) Associations between community cohesion and subjective wellbeing of the elderly in Guangzhou, China–a cross-sectional study based on the structural equation model. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(3):953. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18030953
Layera MLM, Oter G, Perret V (2020) Perceived insecurity in the neighborhoods of Santiago (Capital of Chile): the importance of subjective well-being. Dados-Revista De Ciencias Sociais 63(1):e20170036. https://doi.org/10.1590/001152582020200
Lee MR, Blanchard TC (2012) Community attachment and negative affective states in the context of the BP Deepwater Horizon disaster. Am Behav Sci 56:24–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211409384
Lee J, Fraser T (2019) How do natural hazards affect participation in voluntary association? The social impacts of disasters in Japanese society. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 34:108–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.11.009
Lee GY, Um YJ (2021) Factors affecting obesity in urban and rural adolescents: demographic, socioeconomic characteristics, health behavior and health education. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18:2405. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052405
Lee RM, Dean BL, Jung KR (2008) Social connectedness, extraversion, and subjective well–being: testing a mediation model. Personality Individ Differ 45(5):414–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.05.017
Litwin H (2000) Activity, social network and well-being: an empirical examination. Can J Aging 19:343–362. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0714980800015038
Lv QC, Xie XL (2017) Community involvement and place identity: the role of perceived values, perceived fairness, and subjective well-being. Asia Pac J Tour Res 22(9):951–964. https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2017.1345772
Maddux JE (2018) Subjective well-being and life satisfaction: an introduction to conceptions, theories, and measures. In: Maddux JE (ed) Subjective well–being and life satisfaction. Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group, England, UK, pp 3–31
Magno F, Dossena G (2020) Pride of being part of a host community? Medium–term effects of mega–events on citizen quality of life: the case of the World Expo 2015 in Milan. J Destination Market Manag 15:100410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm
Manzo LC, Perkins DD (2006) Finding common ground: the importance of place attachment to community participation and planning. J Plan Lit 20(4):335–350
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) (2017) Annual health, labour and welfare report 2017, Health and welfare services for the elderly. Available online: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/wp/hakusyo/kousei/17-2/dl/10.pdf. (2023/3/2). (in Japanese)
Mueller RO, Hancock GR (2010) Structural equation modeling. In: Hancock R, Mueller RO (eds) The Reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences, Ing. Routledge, New York, pp 371–383
Okamoto H, Okada S, Shirasawa M (2005) The relationship between unmet perceived needs of the older adults for social participation and life satisfaction. J Hum Life Sci 3:185–191. https://doi.org/10.24544/ocu.20180308-147
Omori J, Mitsumori Y, Kobayashi M, Ono W, Anzai H, Takahashi K, Miyazaki T, Sakai T, Saito M (2014) Concept analysis of “Attachment to the local community” for public health nursing. Jpn J Public Health Nurs 3(1):40–48. https://doi.org/10.15078/jjphn.3.1_40
Orgaz-Agüera F, Castellanos-Verdugo M, Acosta Guzman JA, Cobena M, Oviedo-García MDLÁ (2022) The mediating effects of community support for sustainable tourism, community attachment, involvement, and environmental attitudes. J Hospitality Tour Res 46(7):1298–1321. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348020980126
Parra-Rizo MA, Sanchis-Soler G (2020) Satisfaction with life, subjective well-being and functional skills in active older adults based on their level of physical activity practice. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17:1299. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041299
Phillips DR, Siu OL, Yeh AG, Cheng KH (2005) The impacts of dwelling conditions on older persons’ psychological well-being in Hong Kong: the mediating role of residential satisfaction. Soc Sci Med 60:2785–2797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.027
Pontin E, Schwannauer M, Tai S, Kinderman P (2013) A UK validation of a general measure of subjective well-being: the modified BBC subjective well-being scale (BBC-SWB). Health Qual Life Outcomes 11(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-11-150
Powdthavee N (2008) Putting a price tag on friends, relatives, and neighbours: using surveys of life satisfaction to value social relationships. J Socio-Econ 37:1459–1480
Raymond CM, Brown G, Weber D (2010) The measurement of place attachment Personal, community, and environmental connections. J Environ Psychol 30:422–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.08.002
Robertson MC, Song J, Taylor WC, Durand CP, Basen-Engquist KM (2018) Urban–rural differences in aerobic physical activity, muscle strengthening exercise, and screen–time sedentary behavior. J Rural Health 34:401–410. https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12295
Rodríguez-Pose A, von Berlepsch V (2014) Social capital and individual happiness in Europe. J Happiness Stud 15(2):357–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-013-9426-y
Schellenberg G, Lu CH, Schimmele C, Hou F (2018) The correlates of self-assessed community belonging in Canada: social capital, neighbourhood characteristics, and rootedness. Soc Indic Res 140(2):597–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1783-1
Strommen J, Sanders GF (2018) Perceptions of changing communities among rural elders: Impact on well-being. Act Adapt Aging 42:210–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924788.2017.1398033
Taniguchi H, Potter DA (2016) Who are your neighbors? Neighbor relationships and subjective well-being in Japan. Appl Quality Life Res 11(4):1425–1443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-015-9445-4
Toikko T, Pehkonen A (2018) Community belongingness and subjective well-being among unemployed people in a Finnish community. Int J Sociol Soc Policy 38(9–10):754–765. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijssp-01-2018-0010
Tsurumi T, Imauji A, Managi S (2019) Relative income, community attachment and subjective well–being: evidence from Japan. Kyklos 72(1):152–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/kykl.12193
Twigger-Ross CL, Uzzell DL (1996) Place and identity processes. J Environ Psychol 16(3):205–220. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1996.0017
Vallejos GG, Despott CC (2019) Practice of health professionals providing interventions in attachment with a community perspective: ‘encounters and disagreements.’ Cultura de los Cuidados 23(55):183–195. https://doi.org/10.14198/cuid.2019.55.16
Wang X (2016) Subjective well-being associated with size of social network and social support of older adults. J Health Psychol 21:1037–1042. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105314544136
Wang SC, Fowler PJ (2019) Social cohesion, neighborhood collective efficacy, and adolescent subjective well-being in urban and rural Taiwan. Am J Commun Psychol 63:499–510. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12324
Williams A, Kitchen P (2012) Sense of place and health in Hamilton, Ontario: a case study. Soc Indic Res 108:257–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0065-1
Yasunaga A, Yaguchi K, Tokunaga M (2002) The effects of exercise habits on subjective well-being in the older adults. Jpn J Phys Educ Health Sport Sci 47:173–183. https://doi.org/10.5432/jjpehss.KJ00003390687. (in Japanese)
Yeo LHW, Mah FCY, Chong EY, Lim AHS, Ng ST, Yi H (2022) Does gender matter to promote mental health through community engagement among older adults? Aging Ment Health 26:186–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2020.1855106
Zhang Z, Zhang J (2015) Social participation and subjective well-being among retirees in China. Soc Indic Res 123:143–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0728-1
Zwiers S, Markantoni M, Strijker D (2018) The role of change-and stability-oriented place attachment in rural community resilience: a case study in south-west Scotland. Community Dev J. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsw020
Funding
Open access funding provided by Tokyo University of Science.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.
About this article
Cite this article
Seo, Y. Community attachment as a factor in the subjective well-being of older adults in urban and rural areas: a case study in Tokyo, Osaka, and Shikoku region in Japan. Asia-Pac J Reg Sci 7, 1123–1140 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41685-023-00310-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41685-023-00310-w