Abstract
Theory of Mind, or the ability to attribute mental states to the self and others, forms the foundation of social cognitive processes or social cognition. Since its conception in 1978, the construct has been enjoying increasing attention from researchers and it has been widely studied in the context of autism spectrum disorder. This paper tries to review the issues surrounding the assessment of the construct. Theory of Mind (ToM) assessment goes almost synonymously with false belief tests. And assessing ToM with false belief tasks did not pose a problem because the construct had traditionally been studied mostly, if not exclusively on children. This paper discusses the danger of testing theory of mind with false belief tasks only and the serious necessity to study the construct in the adult population. The paper also discusses why the construct needs to be assessed in a culture-specific manner, the problems with the existing recent tools that have been developed to measure the construct, the complexity of simulating real social stimuli, and the subtleties around the construct that is to be taken care of while developing assessment measures.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Apperly, I. (2010). Mindreaders: the cognitive basis of “theory of mind”. London: Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203833926.
Apperly, I. A., Back, E., Samson, D., & France, L. (2008). The cost of thinking about false beliefs: evidence from adults’ performance on a non-inferential theory of mind task. Cognition, 106(3), 1093–1108.
Atran, S., & Medin, D. L. (1997). Knowledge and actions: Cultural models of nature and resource management in Mesoamerica. In M. H. Bazerman, D. M. Messick, A. E. Tenbrunsel, & K. A. Wade-Benzoni (Eds.), The New Lexington Press management series and the New Lexington Press social and behavioral science series. Environment, ethics, and behavior: The psychology of environmental valuation and degradation (pp. 171–208). San Francisco: The New Lexington Press/Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Baron-Cohen, S. (2000). Theory of mind and autism: a review. In International review of research in mental retardation (Vol. 23, pp. 169–184). Academic Press.
Baron-Cohen, S., O’Riordan, M., Jones, R., Stone, V., & Plaisted, K. (1999). A new test of social sensitivity: detection of faux pas in normal children and children with Asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29(5), 407–418.
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001). The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Test revised version: a study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 42(2), 241–251.
Bennett, J. (1978). Some remarks about concepts. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1, 557–560.
Bird, C. M., Castelli, F., Malik, O., Frith, U., & Husain, M. (2004). The impact of extensive medial frontal lobe damage on ‘Theory of Mind’and cognition. Brain, 127(4), 914–928.
Blakemore, S. J. (2008). The social brain in adolescence. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(4), 267.
Blakemore, S. J., den Ouden, H., Choudhury, S., & Frith, C. (2007) Adolescent development of the neural circuitry for thinking about intentions, Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2(2), 130–139.
Bosco, F. M., Colle, L., De Fazio, S., Bono, A., Ruberti, S., & Tirassa, M. (2009). Th.o.m.a.s.: an exploratory assessment of Theory of Mind in schizophrenic subjects. Consciousness and Cognition, 18(1), 306–319.
Brown, B. B. (2004). Adolescents’ relationships with peers. In Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 363–394).
Castelli, F., Happé, F., Frith, U., & Frith, C. (2000). Movement and mind: a functional imaging study of perception and interpretation of complex intentional movement patterns. Neuroimage, 12(3), 314–325.
Cross, S. E., Morris, M. L., & Gore, J. S. (2002). Thinking about oneself and others: the relational-interdependent self-construal and social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(3), 399.
Das, T., Karmakar, A., Ganguly, A., & Dogra, A. K. (2017). Bengali Adaptation of Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) in young adults: the B-IRI. Indian Journal of Psychology and Education, 7(1), 176–181.
Davis, M. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. Catalogue of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.
Dennett, D. C. (1978). Current issues in the philosophy of mind. American Philosophical Quarterly, 15(4), 249–261.
Dumontheil, I., Apperly, I. A., & Blakemore, S. J. (2010). Online usage of theory of mind continues to develop in late adolescence. Developmental Science, 13(2), 331–338.
Fernández-Abascal, E. G., Cabello, R., Fernández-Berrocal, P., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2013). Test-retest reliability of the ‘Reading the Mind in the Eyes’ test: a one-year follow-up study. Molecular autism, 4(1), 33.
Fiske, A. P., Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., and Nisbett, R. E. (1998). “The Cultural Matrix of Social Psychology”. The Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th ed., (pp. 915–981), edited by Daniel T. Gilbert and Susan T. Fiske. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Giedd, J. N., Blumenthal, J., Jeffries, N. O., Castellanos, F. X., Liu, H., Zijdenbos, A., et al. (1999). Brain development during childhood and adolescence: a longitudinal MRI study. Nature Neuroscience, 2(10), 861.
Gilet, A. L., Mella, N., Studer, J., Grühn, D., & Labouvie-Vief, G. (2013). Assessing dispositional empathy in adults: a French validation of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI). Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 45(1), 42.
Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1999). Is there a universal need for positive self-regard? Psychological Review, 106(4), 766.
Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (1999). Rethinking the value of choice: a cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(3), 349.
Kobayashi, C., Glover, G. H., & Temple, E. (2006). Cultural and linguistic influence on neural bases of ‘Theory of Mind’: an fMRI study with Japanese bilinguals. Brain and Language, 98(2), 210–220.
Larson, R. W., Moneta, G., Richards, M. H., & Wilson, S. (2002). Continuity, stability, and change in daily emotional experience across adolescence. Child Development, 73(4), 1151–1165.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224.
McGivern, R. F., Andersen, J., Byrd, D., Mutter, K. L., & Reilly, J. (2002). Cognitive efficiency on a match to sample task decreases at the onset of puberty in children. Brain and Cognition, 50(1), 73–89.
Moriguchi, Y., Ohnishi, T., Kawachi, T., Mori, T., Hirakata, M., Yamada, M., et al. (2005). Specific brain activation in Japanese and Caucasian people to fearful faces. Neuroreport, 16(2), 133–136.
Moriguchi, Y., Ohnishi, T., Mori, T., Matsuda, H., & Komaki, G. E. N. (2007). Changes of brain activity in the neural substrates for theory of mind during childhood and adolescence. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 61(4), 355–363.
Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 291.
Perner, J., & Wimmer, H. (1985). “John thinks that Mary thinks that…” attribution of second-order beliefs by 5-to 10-year-old children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 39(3), 437–471.
Perner, J., Leekam, S. R., & Wimmer, H. (1987). Three-year-olds’ difficulty with false belief: the case for a conceptual deficit. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5(2), 125–137.
Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(4), 515–526.
Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1978). When is attribution of beliefs justified? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, 492–593.
Russell, J., Saltmarsh, R., & Hill, E. (1999). What do executive factors contribute to the failure on false belief tasks by children with autism? The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 40(6), 859–868.
Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Tomer, R., Yaniv, S., & Aharon-Peretz, J. (2002). Empathy deficits in Asperger syndrome: A cognitive profile. Neurocase, 8(2), 245–252.
Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Tomer, R., Berger, B. D., & Aharon-Peretz, J. (2003). Characterization of empathy deficits following prefrontal brain damage: the role of the right ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 15(3), 324–337.
Söderstrand, P., & Almkvist, O. (2012). Psychometric data on the Eyes Test, the Faux Pas Test, and the Dewey Social Stories Test in a population-based Swedish adult sample. Nordic Psychology, 64(1), 30–43.
Sullivan, K., Zaitchik, D., & Tager-Flusberg, H. (1994). Preschoolers can attribute second-order beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 30(3), 395.
Vellante, M., Baron-Cohen, S., Melis, M., Marrone, M., Petretto, D. R., Masala, C., & Preti, A. (2013). The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test: systematic review of psychometric properties and a validation study in Italy. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 18(4), 326–354.
Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13(1), 103–128.
Yurgelun-Todd, D. A., & Killgore, W. D. (2006). Fear-related activity in the prefrontal cortex increases with age during adolescence: a preliminary fMRI study. Neuroscience Letters, 406(3), 194–199.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Karmakar, A., Dogra, A.K. Assessment of Theory of Mind in Adults: Beyond False Belief Tasks. Act Nerv Super 61, 142–146 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41470-019-00028-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41470-019-00028-1