Abstract
The Colorado potato beetle (CPB), Leptinotarsa decemlineata, poses a significant threat to potato crops globally and has developed resistance to numerous insecticides. Entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs), from the genera Steinernema and Heterorhabditis, are promising biocontrol agents. This study aimed to identify the bacterial symbionts of ten native EPN isolates, evaluate the efficiency of cell free supernatants (CFSs) from their symbiotic bacteria against different developmental stages of CPB, and determine the effect of these CFSs on CPB developmental stages and lifespan. The recA gene region was utilized to determine the symbiotic bacteria of ten local EPNs. CFSs from these bacteria were applied orally and through contact to CPB’s various developmental stages (L1/L2, L3/L4 larval stages, and adults). Mortalities, developmental transition times, and lifespans of adults were observed. The CFSs showed significant toxicity to CPB, with higher efficiency against young larvae. The CFSs exhibited cumulatively lethal effects over time, particularly on L1/L2 larval stages. CFSs from X. bovienii exhibited the highest efficacy. In all cases, where larvae received CFSs orally or by contact, they failed to develop into pupae and adults. In contrast, the transition periods of old larvae to pupal and adult stages were comparable to those of the control group. Lifespans of adults differed based on bacterial isolates and application methods. This study shows the potential efficacy of CFSs from Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus as biocontrol agents against CPB, particularly in its young larval stages. Further research is needed to unravel the mechanisms behind these effects and examine the impact on CPB mating and oviposition behaviors.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introductıon
The Colorado potato beetle (CPB), Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), is a notorious defoliator of potato crops worldwide. Its distribution spans approximately 16 million square kilometers, covering regions in Asia, Europe, and North America (Ditner and Ciszewska 2004; Alyokhin et al. 2008; Hsiao and Fraenkel 1968). In addition to its primary host, the CPB exhibits a diverse diet, targeting crops such as tomatoes, eggplants, tobacco, peppers, and cabbage, along with common weeds (Hare 1990; Riddick et al. 2013; Weber and Ferro 2016). The CPB's polyphagous nature facilitates its persistence in fields even when potato plants are absent (Ditner et al. 2019). Remarkably, a single CPB can consume a minimum of 100 cm2 of potato foliage during its lifetime, causing considerable yield losses when control measures are absent (Zehnder et al. 1994; Ferro et al. 1997).
Current control strategies for CPB encompass an array of methods, including cultural practices, biological, and chemical controls (Sewell and Alyokhin 2005; Szendrei et al. 2012). However, chemical control with insecticides represent a cornerstone of CPB management (Grafius 1995; Boiteau et al. 2009). This reliance on chemical control has had a dramatic impact on the insecticide industry's development (Alyokhin et al. 2008, 2015). The CPB's documented resistance to a broad range of insecticides (Alyokhin et al. 2008; Alyokhin et al. 2012; Park et al. 2002, Grafius and Douches 2008; Whalon and Mota-Sanchez 2017; Kaplanoglu et al. 2017; Schoville et al. 2018) shows the urgent need for alternative control methods. One of the promising alternatives is the utilization of entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs), notably those belonging to the Steinernema and Heterorhabditis genera. EPNs are recognized for their rapid efficacy, active host-seeking behavior, and compatibilities with pesticides (Shapiro-Ilan et al. 2018; Campos-Herrera et al. 2013; Moens et al. 2019). Their pathogenicity is attributed to symbiotic relationship with Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus bacteria (Georgis et al. 2006; Koppenhöfer and Kaya 1998).
Prior studies have demonstrated that both cell suspensions and cell-free supernatants (CFSs) derived from Xenorhabdus spp. and Photorhabdus spp. exhibit potent lethality against economically significant agricultural pests (Bussaman et al. 2006; Hinchliffe 2010; Tobias et al. 2017; Shehata et al. 2019; Shapiro-Ilan et al. 2020; Askary and Abd-Elgawad 2021; Abd-Elgawad 2022; Yuksel et al. 2022a, b). These symbiotic bacteria have garnered significant attention among researchers for their crucial role in augmenting the virulence of EPNs.
Nevertheless, as far as our knowledge extends, no study has specifically examined the efficacy of CFSs from Xenorhabdus or Photorhabdus against the CPB. This conspicuous gap in the literature prompted our current study, which seeks to evaluate the efficacy CFSs from local isolates against CPB. We particularly concentrate on exploring their contact and oral efficacy within the controlled Petri dish environment. Additionally, we aim to examine the influence of CFSs on various developmental stages of CPB and its overall lifespan, thereby contributing valuable insights into potential biocontrol strategies for this pest.
Materıals and methods
Entomopathogenic nematodes
Entomopathogenic nematode isolates, which were previously isolated from Kayseri and Nevşehir provinces, were used in the study. Nematodes were produced on the last instar larvae of Galleria mellonella (Woodring and Kaya 1988). Larvae of G. mellonella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) were cultured on artificial diet at 28 °C and in the dark (Mohammad and Coppel 1983). Information about the isolates is given in Table 1.
The colorado potato beetle Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say
Potato production was carried out in an area of 3 decares in order to ensure the continuous supply of the insect cultures and potato plants throughout the study period. In order to increase CPB populations in this field, none of the standart control medhods was applied. Only maintenance practices such as irrigation and fertilization were carried out in the field.
The populations obtained in the field were collected and left on the potato plants in pots. For the experiments, only individuals without any visible symptoms of infection or sickness were collected.
Isolation of symbiotic bacteria
In order to obtain symbiotic bacteria from each entomopathogenic isolate, approximately 500 recently emerged infective juveniles (IJs) were utilized. To ensure the exclusion of external contaminants, a sterile Ringer's solution containing 10% sodium hypochlorite by volume was employed for immersing these IJs over a period of 10 min. Following this decontamination step, the IJs underwent two subsequent rinses in sterile Ringer's solution, after which they were crushed in 1 cc of sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The resulting suspension was evenly streaked in 10-µl aliquots onto Nutrient Bromothymol Blue Triphenyltetrazolium Agar (NBTA) plates, following the methodology as described by Akhurst and Boemare (1988). These Petri dishes were then incubated at 28 °C for 48 h, and the ensuing colony-forming units were set aside for molecular analysis.
To extract genomic DNA, the GeneMATRIX tissue and bacterial DNA purification kit (EURx) was employed. Subsequently, the recombinase A gene (recA) was amplified using the recA F (5′-GCTATTGATGAAAATAAACA-3′) and recA R (5′-RATTTT RTCWCCRTTRTAGCT-3′) primers, aligning with the methodology outlined by Tailliez et al. (2010). The PCR amplification protocol consisted of an initial denaturation step at 94 °C for 12 min, followed by 30 cycles comprising denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, annealing at 50 °C for 1 min, extension at 72 °C for 2 min, and a final extension step at 72 °C for 7 min. The PCR products underwent verification through electrophoresis and were subsequently sent for sequencing to Macrogen, Inc. (South Korea). The resulting sequences were then deposited in GenBank (Table 2).
Preparation of cell-free bacterial supernatants from the symbiotic bacteria
Initially, the bacterial isolates were streaked onto NBTA plates and allowed to incubate for 24 h. Subsequently, a loopful of the bacterial culture was carefully transferred into a 300 ml conical flask containing 100 ml of Nutrient Broth (Merck, Darmstadt-Germany). The bacterial culture was placed on a rotary incubator, set at 150 rpm, for an incubation duration of 144 h. The entire incubation process was meticulously conducted in a dark environment, maintaining a temperature of 28 °C.
After the incubation period, the bacterial cultures were transferred into 50-ml centrifuge tubes and subjected to centrifugation at 20,000 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C. This centrifugation effectively separated the bacterial cells from the culture, resulting in a clear supernatant. To further ensure the purity of the obtained cell-free supernatant, the they were filtered through a 0.22 μm Millipore filter. The flow-through from this filtration process was designated as the cell-free supernatant. To confirm the complete absence of any residual bacterial cells, a portion of the flow-through was aseptically streaked onto NBTA agar plates, following the rigorous procedure as previously described by Bussaman et al. (2012) and Hazir et al. (2016).
The obtained supernatants were subsequently transferred into sterile 50 ml centrifuge tubes, sealed, and safely stored at − 20 °C until they were to be employed for the experimental purposes, adhering to the protocol delineated by Muangpat et al. (2017).
Determination of oral effects of bacterial supernatants on different stages of CPB
In order to determine the oral effect, each CFS used in the study was applied to the L1/L2, L3/L4 and adult stages of the CPB. This involved immersing potato plant leaves in 1 mL of the respective bacterial supernatant, allowing them to dry in 9 cm diameter Petri dishes. Subsequently, five CPB individuals were placed on each treated leaf, and the Petri dishes were sealed with parafilm. These dishes were then placed in an incubator set at 25 °C for a duration of 96 h. Each application was replicated three times, and the entire experiment was conducted twice. Control leaves were treated solely with Nutrient broth. The Petri dishes were checked at 24, 48, 72, and 96 h post-application, and dead insects were counted. Determination of insect mortality involved gently probing the insects with a fine-tipped needle; those that displayed no movement upon contact were considered dead. Upon concluding the application period, we recorded the time it took for surviving larvae to progress to the pupal and adult stages. This allowed us to assess the impact of bacterial supernatants on developmental stages and lifespan.
Determination of the contact effects of bacterial supernatants on different stages of CPB
To assess contact toxicity, we exposed the potato beetles to 1 ml of bacterial supernatant for specified time intervals and then transferred them to Petri dishes containing potato leaves. The control group, on the other hand, was immersed solely in Nutrient broth medium and placed in Petri dishes. In order to evaluate the contact effect on the larvae, we conducted inspections at 24, 48, 72, and 96 h post-application, during which we counted the dead insects. Determination of insect mortality was same as for the oral effect bioassays. Similar to the study assessing oral efficacy, we recorded the time it took for surviving larvae to progress to the pupal and adult stages after 96 h, and we also noted the time of death for adult beetles.
Statistical analyzes
Since there were no mortalities in the control groups, no correction were made to the mortality rates. The analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics version 20.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and the mortalities underwent arcsine transformation prior to analysis. In the bioassays for oral and contact efficacy, the effects of main factors and their interactions was determined at 0.05 level (P ≤ 0.05). Factorial repeated measures ANOVA were applied to all data, utilizing a General Linear Model. The data of transition time and adult lifespan were subjected to one-way ANOVA. Tukey’s multiple range tests were used to categorize mean differences (P ≤ 0.05).
Results
Molecular characterization of symbiotic bacteria
Based on the cladogram created using symbiotic bacteria obtained from 10 native entomopathogenic nematode isolates and representative data from the recombinase A (recA) gene region sourced from GenBank, we observed that Xenorhabdus species and strains (specifically X. bovienii, X. nematophila, and X. budapestensis) were prevalent across all locations. These Xenorhabdus species were found to be closely related to other selected Xenorhabdus species, with X. bovienii exhibiting significant intraspecific polymorphism and substantial divergence from other species, supported by high bootstrap values of 99%. Based on the cladogram, it can be concluded that X. bovienii demonstrates paraphyletic characteristics. Similarly, species X. nematophila and X. budapestensis clustered together, forming a distinct paraphyletic group. In terms of Photorhabdus species, P. luminescens subsp. kayaii was identified as descending from P. temperata subsp. temperata (Fig. 1).
Oral efficacies of bacterial supernatants on different stages of CPB
The differences in the mortalities observed in the CPB larvae were significantly affected by all the main factors of interest (Supernatant [S], Exposure Time [T], and Developmental Stage [D]) (Table 3). Moreover, the interactions of the main factors, specifically the three-way interaction; T*D*S also exhibited the statistical significance (P < 0.001). Namely, all CFSs showed statistically significant toxic effect on CPB.
When we assessed the mortalities induced by the CFSs, a notable trend emerged. As the developmental stage of the target insects advances, we observed that there is a discernible reduction in the efficacy of CFSs, particularly in the context of younger larval stages. Furthermore, the impact of CFSs on adult insects appears to be relatively limited.
Additionally, upon closer examination of the evolving effectiveness of CFSs over time, a noteworthy pattern becomes apparent. Over time, the efficacy of CFSs tends to increase, demonstrating a cumulative lethal effect. This augmentation in their lethal effect is particularly conspicuous on L1/L2 larval stages.
Comparing the efficacies of CFSs from various isolates at specific time intervals, we observe the highest efficacy against the young larval stage in isolates X. bovienii UTP-5 and X. nematophila KCS-4-S, resulting in 15% mortality. However, the mortalities of the remaining 10 isolates did not display statistically significant differences.
Following a 48-h application period, the evaluation of the effectiveness on young larvae exhibited remarkable results. Notably, the X. bovienii KBC-4 isolate exhibited the highest efficacy, inducing a35% mortality. Subsequently, X. bovienii AKS-1, X. bovienii UTP-5, and X. bovienii MCB-8 isolates exhibited comparable effectiveness, with mortalities ranging around 30%.
Upon expiration of the 72-h application period, a switch in efficacy patterns became apparent. X. bovienii AKS-1 showed a substantial increase in efficacy, resulting in high mortality of 60%. Both P. luminescens subsp. kayaii FLH-4-H and X. bovienii UTP-5 isolates exhibited comparable efficacy, causing 57.5% mortality against the young larvae. These findings emphasize the dynamic nature of activity over time and between various isolates (Table 4).
In a parallel set of observations focused on determining the transitional timelines of surviving larvae to pupal and adult stages, as well as the times of mortality in adult insects 96 h post-application, intriguing findings were obtained. Notably, for the surviving individuals in the early larval stage, it was consistently observed that they succumbed to mortality before progressing to the pupal stage across all CFSs applications. In contrast, concerning individuals in the old larval stage survived (Table 5), X. bovienii E-76, X. bovienii AKS-1, and X. bovienii KBC-4 treated larvae significantly accelerated the transition from larvae to pupae compared to the control group. This finding suggests that these specific treatments effectively hasten the larval-pupal transition phase. Conversely, treatments MGZ-4-S, X. bovienii KCS-4-S, and X. bovienii UTP-5 demonstrated moderately longer transition times, yet these were still comparable to the control. Notably, X. bovienii MCB-8 and X. bovienii DDKY-11 exhibited the longest durations for this transition, aligning closely with the control group's results, thereby indicating these treatments did not significantly alter the larval-pupal transition in comparison to the control.
Regarding the pupal-adult transition, treatment X. bovienii E-76 remarkably shortened the transition period relative to the control group. This indicates a potent effect of X. bovienii E-76 in accelerating the pupal to adult development. Other treatments, including X. bovienii AKS-1, P. luminescens subsp. kayaii FLH-4-H, X. bovienii UTP-5, X. Budapestensis MGZ-4-S, X. bovienii KCS-4-S, and X. bovienii DDKY-11 presented varied transition times. However, these were predominantly shorter or similar to those observed in the control group, suggesting their moderate effectiveness in expediting this developmental stage. In contrast, treatments X. bovienii KBC-4, P. luminescens subsp. kayaii AVB-15, and X. bovienii MCB-8, respectively, showed transition times that were longer or akin to the control group, indicating a negligible or absent influence in accelerating the pupal to adult transition.
Overall, the data elucidates that certain treatments significantly hasten developmental transitions in insects, particularly from larvae to pupae and from pupae to adults, in comparison to untreated controls. Other treatments, however, exhibited limited efficacy or mirrored the natural developmental timeline observed in the control group.
Contact effects of bacterial supernatants on different stages of CPB
Using repeated measures ANOVA, a thorough examination of the interaction table involving factors (Supernatant [S], Exposure Time [T], and Developmental Stage [D]) revealed statistically significant findings. Specifically, the triple interaction among these factors (T*D*S) demonstrated a high degree of statistical significance (P < 0.001), as outlined in Table 6. This statistical outcome highlights a significant interplay among the considered factors in our analysis.
Upon scrutinizing the mortalities resulting from the contact effect of CFSs (Table 7), it becomes clear that their impact on young larval stages is notably pronounced. In the first 72 h, the maximum mortality observed in mature larvae reaches 10%, but notably rises to 30% when the P. luminescens subsp. kayaii FLH-4-H isolate. In contrast, the contact effects of CFSs across all isolates on the adult stage demonstrated considerably lower activity, with a maximum 5% mortality (P < 0.001). This observation applies to P. luminescens subsp. kayaii FLH-4-H, X. bovienii AKS-1, X. bovienii E-76, and X. bovienii DDKY-11.
Analyzing the temporal changes in the contact activities of supernatants from all isolates, it is discernible that the activity exhibited an increase over time (P < 0.05). However, in alignment with the outcomes of oral activity tests, it is apparent that the L1/L2 larval stages manifest greater susceptibility to CFSs.
Comparing the efficacy of supernatants across isolates at specific time intervals, the highest efficacy against young larval stages was observed 24 h post-application, particularly when the supernatant of the X. bovienii KBC-4 isolate was administered, resulting a mortality of 27.5%. In contrast, X. bovienii MCB-8 caused a 10% mortality, representing the least active isolate. Nevertheless, the differences in contact toxicities of CFSs among the other nine isolates, excluding the application of X. bovienii MCB-8 supernatant, did not attain statistical significance (P > 0.05).
Examining activities on young larvae 48 h after application, the X. bovienii KBC-4 isolate emerged as the most effective, inducing a 37.5% mortality, followed by X. nematophila KCS-4-S with 32.5%, and X. bovienii DDKY-11 with 27.5%. While P. luminescens subsp. kayaii FLH-4-H demonstrated the lowest effect at 17.5%, it did not represent a statistically significant difference (P > 0.05).
Finally, after a 72-h application period, X. bovienii KBC-4 caused a 72.5% mortality, while the supernatant application of isolate P. luminescens subsp. kayaii AVB-15 demonstrated the lowest effect and yielded a 32.5% mortality. After 96 h post-application, the highest mortality was achieved at 87.5% with X. bovienii KBC-4, closely followed by X. bovienii AKS-1 (85%) and X. nematophila KCS-4-S (77.5%). These differences are proportional, and no statistically significant distinction was observed among the activities of the isolates (P > 0.05).
When evaluating the impact of supernatants on old larvae, no significant effect was discernible within the first 72 h after application. However, the CFS derived from the P. luminescens subsp. kayaii FLH-4-H isolate demonstrated the highest efficacy with a 30% mortality. Correspondingly, similar to the oral effect studies, CFSs were found to exert no significant effect on adult insects.
In the part of the study to determine the timing of developmental changes in larvae that survived application of CFSs, we observed a consistent and surprising pattern developed. Specifically, across all CFS treatments, individuals that survived the early larval stage always perished before reaching the pupal stage.
In addition, it became evident that the transition to the pupal stage happened more rapidly in mature larvae compared to the control group (Table 8). The treatments X. bovienii E-76, P. luminescens subsp. kayaii FLH-4-H, X. bovienii KBC-4, and P. luminescens subsp. kayaii AVB-15, demonstrated a significant acceleration in transition times compared to the control group. This indicates the effectiveness of these treatments in hastening the larval to pupal transition phase. In contrast, X. bovienii AKS-1 and X. bovienii MCB-8, respectively, exhibited prolonged transition times. Additionally, treatments X. budapestensis X. budapestensis MGZ-4-S, X. bovienii KCS-4-S, and X. bovienii DDKY-11 showed moderately extended transition periods, albeit within the range of the control group.
Regarding the pupal to adult transition, X. bovienii E-76 and X. bovienii DDKY-11 considerably shortened the duration of this stage compared to the control group, underscoring their potent influence in accelerating this phase of development. Meanwhile, treatments P. luminescens subsp. kayaii FLH-4-H, X. bovienii KBC-4, and P. luminescens subsp. kayaii AVB-15 resulted in slightly abbreviated transition times relative to the control. Conversely, treatments X. bovienii AKS-1, X. budapestensis MGZ-4-S, X. bovienii KCS-4-S, X. bovienii UTP-5, and X. bovienii MCB-8 were associated with longer transition times than those observed in the control group, implying these treatments were less effective or possibly delayed the transition from pupae to adult.
Overall, the findings suggest a notable variability in the impact of different treatments on the developmental transitions from larvae to pupae and subsequently from pupae to adults in older larvae (L3/L4). The data highlights that while some treatments significantly expedited these developmental processes, others exhibited limited or even a retarding effect on development.when compared to untreated controls.
In our study of the adult lifespans resulting from the contact and oral applications of CFSs (Table 9), several noteworthy trends emerged. For oral application, CFSs from X. bovienii E-76 (9 days), X. bovienii AKS-1 (10 days), X. bovienii UTP-5 (10 days), and P. luminescens subsp. kayaii FLH-4-H (10 days) resulted in shortened adult lifespans. Conversely, the application of CFSs from X. bovienii DDKY-11 (13 days), X. budapestensis MGZ-4-S (12 days), and X. bovienii MCB-8 (12 days) prolonged the lifespan of adults.
Turning the attention to the findings of contact application, only the application of X. bovienii DDKY-11 (14 days) led to an increase in adult lifespan compared to control (P < 0.05). However, the application of CFSs from X. bovienii AKS-1 (8 days), P. luminescens subsp. kayaii FLH-4-H (8 days), and X. bovienii KBC-4 (9 days) resulted in a decrease in adult lifespan (P < 0.05). Notably, a consistent pattern of shortened adult lifespan was observed in X. bovienii E-76, X. bovienii AKS-1, and P. luminescens subsp. kayaii FLH-4-H following both oral and contact applications. However, the adults of CPB exhibited a prolonged lifespan in both oral and contact applications of X. bovienii DDKY-11(P < 0.05).
Discussion
We designed this study with three specific objectives. Firstly, we identified the symbiotic bacteria of local entomopathogenic isolates by using recA gene region. This molecular characterization of symbiotic bacteria is consistent with prior studies that utilized genetic markers such as the recA gene region for bacterial identification (Tailliez et al. 2010). Consequently, it is evident that conducting comparative phylogenetic studies, encompassing diverse gene regions, is essential for the comprehensive delineation of subspecies and bacterial races in phylogenetic studies.
Secondly, we evaluated the toxicity of cell-free supernatants (CFSs) from those symbiotic bacteria from local EPNs against different developmental stages of CPB. The best of our knowledge, this approach has not previously been studied in the context of CPB management. This study expands on previous studies regarding the biocontrol potential of EPNs and their associated bacteria. The findings of the current study showing the oral and contact toxicity of CFSs produced by symbiotic bacteria to CPB larvae are consistent with prior research indicating the toxicity of these bacteria and their products to diverse insect hosts (Eleftherianos et al. 2010; Richard and Muñoz-Carpen 2003).
Among the various studies, only one study has delved into the potential toxic effect of symbiotic bacteria on the CPB. This particular study solely employed the toxins produced by Photorhabdus luminescens bacteria. Remarkably, the study revealed that the toxin complex generated by P. luminescens induced mortality rates exceeding 80% among CPB larvae (Blackburn et al. 2005). In our study, we examined two strains of P. luminescens subsp. kayaii, which, in contact efficacy experiments, resulted in larval mortality rates of 60% and 65% among young larvae, and 65% and 72.5% in oral efficacy experiments. This could be attributed to the rapid infiltration of bacterial toxins into the larvae's midgut. Previous research has indicated that cell suspensions from both Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus bacteria proved to be highly effective against the insects under examination when applied to the plants (Mahar et al. 2005; Fukruksa et al. 2017; Vitta et al. 2018). It is well-documented that the efficiency and diversity of secondary metabolites produced by symbiotic bacteria, such as Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus, vary not only among different species but also among isolates of the same species (Eroglu et al. 2019). This difference renders symbiotic bacteria and their associated toxins invaluable tools in the search for novel biopesticides. Hence, it is essential to conduct further research focused at identifying specific toxins with insecticidal properties, particularly concerning agriculturally significant pests like CPB. In the current study, CFSs demonstrated a moderate level of insecticidal activity against early CPB larval stages. Mortalities ranged from 47.5 to 87.5% in both oral and contact bioassays. These findings demonstrate the potential of bacterial toxins as a means of CPB control.
Lastly, we evaluated the sublethal effect of the CFSs by assesing the developmental transition periods and adult’s lifespan. The efficacy of CFSs on the transition times of the developmental stages and adult lifespan support prior studies on the impacts of EPNs and their associated bacteria on insect physiology (Borgonie et al. 2010). This highlights the complex nature of the relationship between EPNs and their hosts. The differences of findings among contact and oral application suggest that the application methods do not significantly alter the impact once the CFSs have entered the insect's body. However, it is worth considering that bacterial species and strains may have varying effects on lifespan, possibly due to differences in toxic metabolites or target regions. Furthermore, it's important to note that we also observed morphological deformations in adult individuals that emerged from pupae following nearly every application. These deformations included significantly smaller bodies, predominantly dull coloration in the pronotum region, and color loss in the abdomen. The pattern which was both observed and assessed underscores the importance of future research focused on elucidating the mechanisms by which bacterial toxins influence insect hormones. For a thorough understanding of the underlying processes, it is essential to comprehend these impacts and their target locations.
One of the most important limitation of the study is the mating and oviposition behavior of the surviving adults. If mating occurs, the amount of eggs laid and the percentage of hatching of those eggs were not determined. A second limitation is the lack studying the effect of supernatants applied to the egg stage. of the results by applying supernatants to the egg stage, since the CPB lays its eggs on leaves. The admission of limitations, such as the need for more study into mating and oviposition habits and the effect on CPB eggs, echoes the urge for complete research into biocontrol measures (Grewal et al. 2005). Future research should address these gaps for a more comprehensive understanding.
Conclusion
In conclusion, both previous studies and the findings of the present research underscore the intriguing variability in the virulence of entomopathogenic bacteria, exemplified by Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus isolates, particularly in their ability to induce mortality in CPB larvae (Ffrench-Constant et al. 2007). This findings aligns with previous studies that has documented the considerable variation in the pathogenicity of different bacterial strains within the Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus genera (Ffrench-Constant et al. 2007). This results emphasize the crucial role played by secondary metabolites (Bode 2009) produced by Xenorhabdus spp. and Photorhabdus spp. in mediating their insecticidal effects (Sergeant et al. 2003; Proschak et al. 2014). Xenorhabdus bacteria are known to secrete a number of secondary metabolites, including XptA1 and XptA2 (Sergeant et al. 2003), Xenocycloins (Proschak et al. 2014), and toxin complexes like as XaxA, XaxB, and the Tcc toxin complexes (Vigneux et al. 2007). These compounds have been demonstrated to serve as potent insecticides (Jarrett et al. 1997; Bowen et al. 1998a,b; ffrench-Constant and Bowen 2000), underlining their significance in the context of biocontrol of insect pests. On the other hand, Photorhabdus species produce their own arsenal of insecticidal compounds, including Tca, Tcb, Tcc, Tcd, PirA, PyB, and Mcf toxin complexes (Blackburn et al. 1998; Bowen et al. 1998a,b; Daborn et al. 2002; Waterfield et al. 2005; Dowling and Waterfield 2007; Sheets and Aktories 2017).
These toxin complexes have been well-documented for their efficiency in controlling insect pests and are crucial for the pathogenicity of Photorhabdus strains. Interestingly, despite the documented insecticidal activity of both Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus, the specific components responsible for their efficiency in cell-free bacterial supernatants remain unclear. This information gap underlines the need for further research to identify and characterize these elusive insecticidal compounds (Jarrett et al. 1997; Blackburn et al. 1998). The identification and characterization of these compounds are not only critical for a more comprehensive understanding of the factors involved their entomopathogenic activities but also for their potential applications in environmentally friendly pest management strategies. The ongoing research in this particular topic may ultimately lead to the development of novel and more effective insecticides based on the compound produced by Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus bacteria. Furthermore, a better understanding of the diverse secondary metabolites produced by these bacteria in their interactions with insect hosts can shed light on the intricate world of microbe-insect relationships, with implications for both basic science and practical pest management tactics.
References
Abd-Elgawad MMM (2022) Xenorhabdus spp.: an overview of the useful facets of mutualistic bacteria of entomopathogenic nematodes. Life 12(9):1360
Akhurst R, Boemare NE (1988) A numerical taxonomic study of the genus Xenorhabdus (Enterobacteriaceae) and proposed elevation of the subspecies of X. nematophilus to species. Microbiology 134(7):1835–1845
Alyokhin A, Baker M, Mota-Sanchez D, Dively G, Grafius E (2008) Colorado potato beetle resistance to insecticides. Am J Potato Res 85:395–413
Alyokhin A, Baker M, Mota-Sanchez D, Dively G (2012) Colorado potato beetle resistance to insecticides. Am J Potato Res 89(5):329–337
Alyokhin A, Mota-Sanchez D, Baker M, Snyder WE, Menasha S, Whalon M, Dively G, Moarsi WF (2015) The Red Queen in a potato field: integrated pest management versus chemical dependency in Colorado potato beetle control. Pest Manag Sci 71(3):343–356
Askary TH, Abd-Elgawad MMM (2021) Opportunities and challenges of entomopathogenic nematodes as bio control agents in their tripartite interactions. Egypt J Biol Pest Cont 31:42
Bode HB (2009) Entomopathogenic bacteria as a source of secondary metabolites. Curr Opin Chem Biol 13(2):224–230
Boiteau G, Aalbu R, Salmon L (2009) Reducing the use of neonicotinoid insecticides in the presence of colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). J Econ Entomol 102(1):118–126
Borgonie G, García-Moyano A, Litthauer D, Bert W, Bester A, van Heerden E, Möller C, Erasmus M, Onstott TC (2011) Nematoda from the terrestrial deep subsurface of South Africa. Nature 474(7349):79–82
Bowen DJ, Ensign JC, Silverman N (1998a) Txp40, a new antimicrobial peptide from Xenorhabdus nematophilus (Enterobacteriaceae). J Invertebr Pathol 71(2):126–132
Bowen D, Rocheleau TA, Blackburn M, Andreev O, Golubeva E, Bhartia R, French-Constant RH (1998) Insecticidal toxins from the bacterium Photorhabdus luminescens. Science 280(5372):2129–2132
Bussaman P, Sermswan RW, Grewal PS (2006) Toxicity of the entomopathogenic bacteria Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus to the mushroom mite (Luciaphorus sp.; Acari: Pygmephoridae) Biocont. Sci Tech 16:245–256
Bussaman P, Sa-Uth C, Rattanasena P, Chandrapatya A (2012) Acaricidal activities of whole cell suspension, cell-free supernatant, and crude cell extract of Xenorhabdus stokiae against mushroom mite (Luciaphorus sp.). J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 13:261–266
Campos-Herrera R, Gutiérrez C, Martínez Y, Gómez Y, Fuentes JD, Rodríguez-Martín J (2013) “Koinobiont” parasitism by entomopathogenic nematodes with different foraging strategies in two aphid host species. J Parasitol 99(6):1102–1110
Canhilal R, Waeyenberge L, Yüksel E, Koca AS, Deniz Y, İmren M (2017) Assessment of the natural presence of entomopathogenic nematodes in Kayseri soils, Turkey. Egyp J Biol Pest Control. https://doi.org/10.5555/20173278354
Daborn PJ, Waterfield N, Silva CP, Au CPY, Sharma S, Ffrench-Constant RH (2002) A single Photorhabdus gene, makes caterpillars floppy (mcf), allows Escherichia coli to persist within and kill insects. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99(16):10742–10747
Ditner N, Ciszewska L (2004) The Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae): from an American agricultural pest to a global model beetle. Insect Science 11(4):269–288
Ditner N, Wiater A, Czajka K, Kazek M (2019) The impact of Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say) herbivory on tomato plant chemical defense against herbivores and resistance to Alternaria solani. Arthropod-Plant Interact 13(3):337–349
Dowling A, Waterfield NR (2007) Insecticidal toxins from Photorhabdus bacteria and their potential use in agriculture. Toxicon 49(4):436–451
Eleftherianos I, Boundy S, Joyce SA, Aslam S (2010) An antibiotic produced by an insect-pathogenic bacterium suppresses host defenses through phenoloxidase inhibition. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(1):435–440
Ferro DN, Slocombe AC, Mercier CT (1997) Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae): residual mortality and artificial weathering of formulated Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. tenebrionis. J Econ Entomol 90:574–582
ffrench-Constant RH, Bowen DJ (2000) Novel insecticidal toxins from nematode-symbiotic bacteria. Cell Mol Life Sci CMLS 57:828–833
ffrench-Constant RH, Dowling A, Waterfield NR (2007) Insecticidal toxins from Photorhabdus bacteria and their potential use in agriculture. Toxicon 49(4):436–451
Fukruksa C, Yimthin T, Suwannaroj M, Muangpat P, Tandhavanant S, Thanwisai A, Vitta A (2017) Isolation and identification of Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus bacteria associated with entomopathogenic nematodes and their larvicidal activity against Aedes aegypti. Parasit Vectors 10(1):1–10
Georgis R, Koppenhöfer AM, Lacey LA, Bélair G, Duncan LW, Grewal PS, Samish M, Tan L, Torr P, Van Tol RWHM (2006) Successes and failures in the use of parasitic nematodes for pest control. Biol Control 38(1):103–123
Grafius EJ (1995) Resistance to insecticides in the Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae): an historical assessment. J Econ Entomol 88(5):1261–1276
Grafius EJ, Douches DS (2008) The present and future role of insect-resistant genetically modified potato cultivars in IPM. Integration of insect-resistant genetically modified crops within IPM programs. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 195–221
Grewal PS, Selvan S, Gaugler R (2005) Thermal adaptation of entomopathogenic nematodes: niche breadth for infection, establishment, and reproduction. J Therm Biol 30(3):241–245
Hare JD (1990) Ecology and management of the Colorado potato beetle. Annu Rev Entomol 35(1):81–100
Hazir S, Shapiro-Ilan DI, Bock CH, Hazir C, Leite LG, Hotchkiss MW (2016) Relative potency of culture supernatants of Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus spp. on growth of some fungal phytopathogens. Eur J Plant Pathol 146:369–381
Hinchliffe S (2010) Insecticidal toxins from the Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus bacteria. Open Toxinol J 3:101–118
Hsiao TH, Fraenkel G (1968) The role of secondary plant substances in the food specificity of the Colorado potato beetle. Ann Entomol Soc Am 61(2):485–493
Kaplanoglu E, Chapman P, Scott IM, Donly C (2017) Overexpression of a cytochrome P450 and a UDP-glycosyltransferase is associated with imidacloprid resistance in the Colorado potato beetle. Leptinotarsa Decemlineata Sci Rep 7:1762
Mahar AN, Munir M, Elawad S, Gowen SR, Hague NGM (2005) Pathogenicity of bacterium, Xenorhabdus nematophila isolated from entomopathogenic nematode (Steinernema carpocapsae) and its secretion against Galleria mellonella larvae. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 6(6):457
Moens M, Perry RN, Jones JT (2019) Cyst nematodes: a diverse group of plant pathogens. Mol Plant Pathol 20(12):1561–1576
Muangpat P, Yooyangket T, Fukruksa C, Suwannaroj M, Yimthin T, Sitthisak S, Vitta A, Tobias NJ, Bode HB, Thanwisai A (2017) Screening of the antimicrobial activity against drug resistant bacteria of Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus associated with entomopathogenic nematodes from Mae Wong National Park, Thailand. Front Microbiol 8:262017
Park HW, Kim KJ, Lee YI, Park KH (2002) Susceptibility of the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), to different insecticides. Korean J Appl Entomol 41(4):243–247
Richard G, Muñoz-Carpena R (2003) Xenorhabdus diversity and activity in laboratory culture collections of Steinernema carpocapsae complex nematodes. Appl Environ Microbiol 69(8):4759–4763
Riddick EW, Booth GM, Mills NJ (2013) Oviposition strategies of Colorado potato beetle in response to elevated UV-B radiation: a field survey. Environ Entomol 42(5):1059–1067
Schoville SD, Chen YH, Andersson MN, Benoit JB, Bhandari A, Bowsher JH et al (2018) A model species for agricultural pest genomics: the genome of the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Sci Rep 8:1931
Sewell GH, Alyokhin A (2005) Control of colorado potato beetle on potato, 2004. Arthropod Manage Tests 30(1):E67
Shapiro-Ilan DI, Han R, Dolinski C, Jones BW (2018) Release strategies for augmentative biological control with entomopathogenic nematodes: theory and practice. J Nematol 50(2):251–266
Shapiro-Ilan D, Hazir S, Glazer I (2020) Advances in use of entomopathogenic nematodes in integrated pest management. In: Kogan M, Heinrichs EA (eds) Integrated management of insect pests: current and future developments. Burleigh Dodds Science Publication, Cambridge, pp 1–30
Sheets J, Aktories K (2017) Insecticidal toxin complexes from Photorhabdus luminescens. Mol Biol Photorhabdus Bact. https://doi.org/10.1007/82_2016_55
Shehata IE, Hammam MMA, El-Borai FE, Duncan LW, Abd-Elgawad MMM (2019) Comparison of virulence, reproductive potential, and persistence among local Heterorhabditis indica populations for the control of Temnorhynchus baal (Reiche & Saulcy) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in Egypt. Egy J Biol Pest Cont 229:32
Szendrei Z, Grafius E, Byrne A, Ziegler A (2012) Resistance to neonicotinoid insecticides in field populations of the Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Pest Manag Sci 68(6):941–946
Tailliez P, Laroui C, Ginibre N, Paule A, Pages S, Boemare N, Le Brun N (2010) Phylogeny of Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus based on universally conserved protein-coding sequences and implications for the taxonomy of these two genera. Proposal of new taxa: X. vietnamensis sp. nov., P. luminescens subsp. hainanensis subsp. nov., and P. luminescens subsp. akhurstii subsp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 60(8):1921–1937
Tobias NJ, Wolff H, Djahanschiri B, Grundmann F, Kronenwerth M, Shi YM (2017) Natural product diversity associated with the nematode symbionts Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus. Nat Microbiol 2:1676–1685
Vitta A, Thimpoo P, Meesil W, Yimthin T, Fukruksa C, Polseela R, Mangkit B, Tandhavanant S, Thanwisai A (2018) Larvicidal activity of Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus bacteria against Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed 8(1):31
Weber DC, Ferro DN (2016) Suitability of certain common and uncommon weed species as hosts for Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Environ Entomol 45(3):601–611
Whalon ME, Mota-Sanchez D (2017) Arthropod pesticide resistance database. Michigan State Univ, East Lansing, MI
Woodring JL, Kaya H K (1988) Steinernematid and heterorhabditid nematodes: a handbook of biology and techniques. Southern cooperative series bulletin (USA).
Yüksel E, Imren M, Özdemir E, Bozbuğa R, Canhilal R (2022a) Insecticidal effect of entomopathogenic nematodes and the cell-free supernatants from their symbiotic bacteria against different larval instars of Agrotis segetum (Denis & Schiffermüller) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Egyp J Biol Pest Control 32(1):1–7
Yüksel E, Özdemir E, Delialioğlu RA, Canhilal R (2022b) Insecticidal activities of the local entomopathogenic nematodes and cell-free supernatants from their symbiotic bacteria against the larvae of fall webworm. Hyphantria Cunea Exp Parasitol 242:108380
Yuksel E, Canhilal R (2019) Isolation, identification, and pathogenicity of entomopathogenic nematodes occurring in Cappadocia Region, Central Turkey. Egyp J Biol Pest Control 29(1):1–7
Zehnder GW, Powelson ML, Jansson RK, Raman KV (1994) Advances in potato pest biology and management. The American Phytopathological Society Press, St Paul, MN
Funding
Open access funding provided by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TÜBİTAK).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
EE: conceptualization; formal analysis; ınvestigation; methodology; validation; visualization; writing—original draft; writing—review and editing. EY: conceptualization; Formal analysis; ınvestigation. RC: project administration.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Confict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Erdem, E., Yüksel, E. & Canhilal, R. Evaluation of cell-free supernatants from the symbiotic bacteria of entomopathogenic nematodes for controlling the colorado potato beetle [Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)]. J Plant Dis Prot 131, 731–742 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-024-00894-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-024-00894-1