Abstract
In this study, length–weight relationships were estimated for discarded trawl fish species and mean size at capture was compared with reported mean length at first maturity (Lm). Sampling was conducted in Sığacık Bay, on the Turkish coast of the central Aegean Sea, between October 2008 and April 2010 onboard a commercial trawler fishing over a depth range of 88–450 m. A total of 14,120 individuals from 15 fish species belonging to 13 families were examined: 9 species were elasmobranchs and 6 were teleosts. Length-weight relationship (LWR) values of b parameter varied between 2.55 and 3.37, with five species having isometric growth, five negative and six positive allometric growth. LWR was not determined for one species due to insufficient sample size. Average size at capture for 14 fish species was found to be below the reported Lm. Our results could be useful in stock assessments and serve as a reference for future comparison of similar parameters estimated in other parts of the Aegean Sea or Mediterranean. Furthermore, information on the discard species in the trawl fishery, their mean size at capture and conservation status is important when considering sustainable ecosystem based fishery management.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
With the implementation of ecosystem-based fisheries management in recent years, attention on the protection of resources which have little or no economic significance including bycatch and discards in bottom trawling has increased (Jørgensen et al. 2016). Discards are generally composed of non-commercial species and undersized individuals of commercial species (Demestre et al. 2018; Soykan et al. 2019). It is well-known that bottom trawls are one of the least selective fishing gears and produce a high amount of discards (Kelleher 2005; Demestre et al. 2018; Roda et al. 2019). Nowadays, there is an increasing scientific interest with regard to impact of bottom trawling on benthic habitats, communities and demersal species. These impacts have potential to create changes in the ecological functioning of benthic components which may result in serious repercussions on the exploited populations (de Juan et al. 2007; Frid 2011). Therefore, the link between benthic communities, especially the discards, and commercial resources must be taken into consideration, because a huge number of ecological interactions may be adversely affected by fishery practices (Demestre et al. 2018). It is also important to address fundamental biological features such as reproduction and feeding of discarded species for ecosystem-based fishery management (EBFM) in order to protect the marine ecosystems and their sustainability (Browman and Stergiou 2004; Gullestad et al. 2014). Reproductive characteristics of many discarded species are generally omitted from scientific papers because they have no commercial value in the fishing industry. Even so, a number of studies (Yapıcı and Filiz 2014; Bradai et al. 2012; D'Onghia et al. 1998; Bottari et al. 2010) do provide information on reproduction of some discarded species of the bottom trawl fishery in the Mediterranean Sea. As is well-known, length at maturity (Lm) is a key population parameter that is extremely important in the fisheries management of exploited stocks (Jennings et al. 2001). Lm for a population is often expressed as the value at which 50% of the sample has reached sexual maturity (King 1996).
Length–weight relationships (LWR) are important tools in fisheries science for estimating the weight for a certain length of an individual fish, assessing the biomass when the length–frequency distribution is known, and calculating the condition indices of fish (Anderson and Gutreuter 1983; Froese 2006; Froese et al. 2011; Yapıcı et al. 2015). LWR is also used to compare life histories of fishes inhabiting different locations (Yapıcı et al. 2015). Previous studies reporting the LWR of some species inhabiting the Turkish coast of the Aegean Sea were conducted by many researchers (Table 1).
In this study, length–weight relationships were estimated for 14 discarded trawl fish species captured from Sığacık Bay, representing the first information available on length–weight relationships for 2 of these species (Nezumia sclerorhynchus, Dalatias licha) for the Turkish coast of the central Aegean Sea. Size at capture of those were compared with reported mean lengths at first maturity for each species. Therefore, our results are important for the fisheries assessment of the area and can be used as a reference for future comparison of similar parameters estimated in other parts of the Aegean Sea or Mediterranean.
Materials and Methods
The Sığacık and Kuşadası Bays are located along the Turkish coast of central Aegean Sea (Fig. 1). Fish samples were taken from a commercial trawler (27 m length, 550 hp. engine), using a commercial bottom trawl net which had 1200 mesh around the mouth of the net. Codend of the trawl net was 5 m in length (400 mesh circumference at the codend) and made of braided polyethylene material with 44 mm mesh size netting. A total of 40 trawl hauls were made between October 2008 and April 2010. During winter; in 2009, number of hauls (n) = 4 and in 2010 n = 6. In spring of both 2009 and 2010 n = 5; and in summer 2009, n = 10. In autumn 2008, n = 6; in 2009, n = 4. Depth was 88–450 m and duration of trawl operation varied from 192 to 415 min at a towing speed of 2.4 to 2.6 knots.
The discarded samples were taken from the discards of each haul after the commercially valuable fraction of the catch had been sorted and retained by the fishermen. The discarded portion of the catch from each haul was first mixed by a paddle on deck in order to maintain a homogenous distribution of species. Then subsamples were taken randomly according to the amount of discarded yield in the sampling ratios of 1/3, 1/5, etc. and put in hard plastics sacks. Discard subsamples in the plastic sacks of each operation were kept in the cold storage room of the vessel and brought to the laboratory fresh after each fishing trial without any chemical application. Fishes were identified to the species level in the laboratory according to Whitehead et al. (1986) and scientific names for each species were checked with the FishBase (Froese and Pauly 2019). Individual samples were measured for total length (TL) to the nearest 1 mm using a measuring board, and weighed to the nearest 0.01 g using an electronic scale in the laboratory.
Length–weight relationship parameters (a and b) were estimated by linear regression analysis on log-transformed data (W = aLb) where “a” is the intercept (coefficient related to body form), and “b” is the slope of the linear regression (exponent indicating the growth type). The degree of association between variables was calculated by the determination coefficient (r2). One of the most important results of the length-weight relationship function is to determine the growth type. It was reported that length weight relationship, hence the type of growth, may significantly change in different life stages of a species and it also depends on size range of the samples (Froese 2006; Ilkyaz et al. 2008). Therefore, growth types of species were given in the results and compared to other studies. In cases where b-values are equal to 3, then the growth of fish is isometric, whereas when b is less or greater than 3, the growth is considered to be negative or positive allometric (Froese 2006). Growth type identification (whether the value of the regression slope (b) was significantly different from 3.0) was based on Student’s t test (Ilkyaz et al. 2008).
Global conservation status of the species was based on the International Union for Conservation of Nature’s Red List of Threatened Species (IUCN 2020). Average size at capture of species were compared with their Lm values which were given in previous studies conducted in the Mediterranean basin,to avoid regional differences. Percentages of individuals caught below the mean length at first maturity were also calculated.
Results
A total of 14,120 individuals from 15 fish species belonging to 13 families were examined: 9 species were elasmobranchs and 6 were teleosts (Table 2). According to the International Union for Conservation of Nature’s Red List of Threatened Species: 11 species are listed to be in the least concern category; 1 is vulnerable (Dalatias licha); 2 are near threatened (Raja clavata, Dipturus oxyrinchus); and 1 is endangered (Squalus acanthias). Sample size; length and weight range; length–weight relationship parameters (95% confidence limits of b, and coefficient of determination); and other relevant parameters for each fish species are given in Table 2. All regressions were highly significant (P < 0.001). Furthermore, sample size ranged from 1 individual for Hexanchus griseus, to 2940 for Scyliorhinus canicula and due to insufficient sample size, LWR for H. griseus could not be determined.
Concerning the type of growth, 5 species (Coelorinchus caelorhincus, Dalatias licha, Galeus melastomus, Nezumia sclerorhynchus, Peristedion cataphractum) showed isometric growth (b = 3); 5 species (Dipturus oxyrinchus, Hoplostethus mediterraneus, Raja clavata, Scyliorhinus canicula, Squalus acanthias) positive allometry (b > 3); and 4 species (Capros aper, Etmopterus spinax, Macroramphosus scolopax, Torpedo marmorata) negative allometry (b < 3) (Table 2).
It was found that TL ranged from 3.4 (Capros aper) to 59.1 cm (Raja clavata). The values of the slope b ranged from 2.55 (Macroramphosus scolopax) to 3.37 (Dipturus oxyrinchus). The a values varied from 0.0007 (Dipturus oxyrinchus) to 0.041 (Torpedo marmorata).
Comparison of average size at capture and Lm are presented in Table 3 indicating that vast majority of discard species caught were below the Lm. Average size at capture of only one teleost species (Nezumia sclerorhynchus) was found to be above the Lm. Regarding the proportion of individuals below Lm, elasmobranch species had the highest percentages. All individuals of elasmobranch fishes (except S. canicula) and P. cataphractum were captured before they reached Lm. The difference between the average size at capture and Lm is particularly large in elasmobranches ranging from 15.7 (S. canicula) to 332.5 cm (H. griseus).
Species listed in alphabetical order. TL, total length (with standard error values); Lm, length at maturity; Per bel Lm, percentage of individuals below maturity length.
Discussion
This study provides length–weight relationships for 15 discarded fish species from the Turkish coast of the central Aegean Sea which was stated to be one of the most suitable trawling areas within the waters surrounding Turkey (Soykan et al. 2019). Average sizes at capture of each species were also compared with reported Lm in order to determine the impact of fishing on reproduction ability.
Froese (2006) has recommended separation of the LWR for males, females and both sexes, when the sex ratio is significantly different from 1:1. Sex of the specimen couldn’t be determined in the present study. Therefore, LWR was calculated for both sexes without making sex determination. Fish samples in this study were intermittently collected throughout the year. Estimated LWR parameters should be considered to be mean annual values for each species of this study since the data were obtained over an extensive period of time (Dulčić and Glamuzina 2006). Furthermore, LWR relationship parameters of Nezumia sclerorhynchus and Dalatias licha are reported for the first time for Turkish coast of the Aegean Sea with the present study.
Length and weight data were reported to provide useful information for estimating growth rates of fish populations (Froese 2006) and they are also useful for many of the fisheries assessment models. Many LWR studies (Ilkyaz et al. 2008; Kapiris and Klaoudatos 2011; Bilge et al. 2014; Yapıcı et al. 2015) include results on growth types of other species. All of the b-values presented in this study ranged from 2.5 to 3.5, similar to the findings of Froese (2006). Most of the b values of the present study are in accordance with those of İşmen et al. (2007) and Bilge et al. (2014). Six of the elasmobranch species of this study match with those of Eronat and Özaydın (2014) who conducted their research in the same area. However, growth types of only two species (G. melastomus and R. clavata) are similar. Discrepancies on growth type for the other 4 species are considered due to sampling strategy (operation depth, hauling time, the type of the net and etc) and length distribution differences between the two studies. At this point, the differences in b-values and growth types between reported results may generally be attributed to changes in the water temperature, maturity stage, habitat, degree of stomach fullness, etc. (Weatherley and Gill 1987) but they were not considered in this study.
According to global conservation status of animals, 4 species sampled in this study are listed in more serious categories than least concern (LC) and among them Squalus acanthias was considered to be facing a very high risk of extinction in the wild (Ellis et al. 2016). R. clavata and S. acanthias are under conservation management and their capture is prohibited. As such if these species are found onboard by inspectors, both the captain and owner of the boat could be fined under Turkish fisheries legislation.
Soykan et al. (2019) reported that discards of bottom trawling in the Aegean Sea constitute an important fraction of the total catch and that the number of affected species is very high. Relatively large number of discarded species and specimens belonging to those were included in the present work. Morphological traits were reported to be useful for assessing the impact of trawling to benthic resources (Jørgensen et al. 2016). While morphological traits like “body size” and “shape” are currently available in the scientific literature, crucial information on “lifespan”, “larval development strategy”, “fecundity” (Tyler et al. 2012) or “reproduction” are rudimentary for many discarded species. Concerning this, all species in the present study were found to be caught at sizes smaller than reported Lm values indicating negative impact on reproduction and sustainability of mentioned species. Although the difference between average size at capture and Lm is relatively small for some bony fish (C. aper, C. caelorhincus), big gaps are noteworthy for cartilaginous fish species.
Understanding the life history or population dynamics of discarded species is important due to interspecific relations. Discarded fish populations may have influences on the abundance of target species (Yapıcı and Filiz 2014). Furthermore, discarded fish species within the demersal trawl catch composition are important for biodiversity and sustainability of future commercial harvests (Yapıcı and Filiz 2014). Therefore, comprehensive studies focusing on discarded fish populations are required in order to understand their biological aspects on the marine food web (Alverson et al. 1994; Yapıcı and Filiz 2014). Discard information such as species composition, discarded amount and discard ratios of the Aegean Sea trawl fishery must be addressed in the further legislative actions for sustainable fisheries management.
Our results could be useful in stock assessments of the area and as a reference for future comparison of similar parameters estimated in other parts of the Aegean Sea or Mediterranean. Long-term monitoring of demersal living resources is essential for sustainability of fish stocks and the conservation of biodiversity. Parameters such as length at first sexual maturity, reproduction period and global conservation status of discarded species should be considered during decision making for continuity of the species and providing the sustainability of the ecosystem.
References
Akyol O, Kinacigil HT, Şevik R (2007) Longline fishery and length–weight relationships for selected fish species in Gökova Bay (Aegean Sea, Turkey). Int J Nat Eng Sci 1:1–4
Alverson DL, Freeberg MH, Pope JG, Murawski SA (1994) A global Assesment on fisheries Bycatch and discards. FAO fisheries technical paper no. 339, Rome, 223 pp. http://www.fao.org/docrep/003/T4890E/T4890E00.HTM.
Anderson RO, Gutreuter SJ (1983) Length, weight, and associated structural indices. In: Nielsen L, Johnson D (eds) Fisheries techniques. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, pp 284–300
Bilge G, Yapici S, Filiz H, Cerim H (2014) Weight-length relations for 103 fish species from the southern Aegean Sea, Turkey. Acta Ichthyol Piscat 44(3):263–269
Bottari T, Dimech M, Nardone G, Ragonese S (2010) Distribution and biological features of the african armoured searobin, Peristedion cataphractum (actinopterygii: scorpaeniformes: peristediidae), off the southern coasts of Sicily (Mediterranean Sea). Acta Ichthyol Piscat 40(2):113–127. https://doi.org/10.3750/AIP2010.40.2.04
Bottaro M, Clo S, Dalu M, Modena M, Vacchi M (2003) Preliminary notes about the biology of the kitefin shark Dalatias licha (Bonnaterre, 1788) from the Gulf of Genoa. Poster presented to the 7th Annual European Association meeting, San Marino
Bradai MN, Saidi B, Enajjar S (2012) Elasmobranchs of the Mediterranean and Black Sea: status, ecology and biology bibliographic analysis. Studies and reviews-general fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean, (91). FAO, Rome, p 103
Browman H, Stergiou K (2004) Perspectives on ecosystem-based approaches to the management of marine resources. Introduction Mar Eco Prog Ser 274:269–303
Ceyhan T, Akyol O, Erdem M (2009) Length–weight relationships of fishes from Gökova Bay, Turkey (Aegean Sea). Turk J Zool 33(1):69–72. https://doi.org/10.3906/zoo-0802-9
Cohen DM, Inada T, Iwamoto T, Scialabba N, 1990 FAO species catalogue. Vol. 10. Gadiform fishes of the world (Order Gadiformes). An annotated and illustrated catalogue of cods, hakes, grenadiers and other gadiform fishes known to date. FAO Fish Synop 125(10). Rome: FAO. 442 p
Consalvo I, Scacco U, Romanelli M, Vacchi M (2007) Comparative study on the reproductive biology of Torpedo torpedo (Linnaeus, 1758) and T. marmorata (Risso, 1810) in the Central Mediterranean Sea. Sci Mar 71(2):213–222
Costa ME, Erzini K, Borges TC (2005) Reproductive biology of the blackmouth catshark, Galeus melastomus (Chondrichthyes: Scyliorhinidae) off the south coast of Portugal. J Mar Biol Ass UK 85:1173–1183
de Juan S, Thrush S, Demestre M (2007) Functional changes as indicators of trawling disturbance on a benthic community located in a fishing ground (NW Mediterranean Sea). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 334:117–129. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps334117
Demestre M, Sartor P, Garcia-de-Vinuesa A, Sbrana M, Maynou MA (2018) Ecological importance of survival of unwanted invertebrates discarded in different NW Mediterranean trawl fisheries. Sci Mar 82(S1):189–198. https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.04784.28A
D'Onghia G, Tursi A, Marano CA, Basanisi M (1998) Life history traits of Hoplostethus mediterraneus (Pisces: Beryciformes) from the North-Western Ionian Sea (Mediterranean Sea). J Mar Biol Ass UK 78:321–339
Dulčić J, Glamuzina B (2006) Length–weight relationships for selected fish species from three eastern Adriatic estuarine systems (Croatia). J Appl Ichthyol 22(4):254–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2006.00633.x
Ellis JR, Soldo A, Dureuil M, Fordham S (2016) Squalus acanthias. The IUCN red list of threatened species 2016: e.T91209505A16527761. Downloaded on 14 April 2020
Eronat EGT, Özaydın O (2014) Length-weight relationship of cartilaginous fish species from Central Aegean Sea (İzmir Bay and Sığacık Bay). Ege J Fish Aqua Sci 31(3):119–125. https://doi.org/10.12714/egejfas.2014.31.3.01
Filiz H, Bilge G (2004) Length-weight relationships of 24 fish species from the North Aegean Sea. Turkey J Appl Ichthyol 20:431–432
Frid CLJ (2011) Temporal variability in the benthos: does the sea floor function differently over time? J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 400:99–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2011.02.024
Froese R (2006) Cubelaw, condition factor and weight-length relationships: history, meta-analysis and recommendations. J Appl Ichthyol 22:241–253
Froese R, Pauly D (2019) FishBase version (12/2019). World Wide Web electronic publication. Available at: http://www.fishbase.org (accessed January 2020)
Froese R, Tsikliras AC, Stergiou KI (2011) Editorial note on weight–length relations of fishes. Acta Ichthyol Piscat 41:261–263. https://doi.org/10.3750/AIP2011.41.4.01
Gullestad P, Aglen A, Bjordal JA, Blom G, Johansen S, Krog J, Misund OA, Røttingen I (2014) Changing attitudes 1970–2012: evolution of the Norwegian management framework to prevent overfishing and to secure long-term sustainability. ICES J Mar Res 71:173–182
Gurkan S, Bayhan B, Akcinar SC, Taskavak E (2010) Length–weight relationship of fish from shallow waters of Çandarli bay (North Aegean Sea, Turkey). Pak J Zool 42(4):495–498
Ilkyaz AT, Metin G, Soykan O, Kinacigil HT (2008) Length–weight relationship of 62 fish species from the Central Aegean Sea. Turkey J Appl Ichthyol 24:699–702
İşmen A, Ozen A, Altinagac U, Ozekinci U, Ayaz A (2007) Weight–length relationships of 63 fish species in Saros Bay, Turkey. J Appl Ichthyol 23:707–708. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2007.00872.x
IUCN (2020). The IUCN red list of threatened species. Version 2020-1. https://www.iucnredlist.org. Downloaded on 19 March 2020
Jennings S, Dinmore TA, Duplisea DE, Warr KJ, Lancaster JE (2001) Trawling disturbance can modify benthic production processes. J Anim Ecol 70:459–475. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2001.00504.x
Jørgensen LL, Planque B, Thangstad TH, Certain G (2016) Vulnerability of megabenthic species to trawling in the Barents Sea. ICES J Mar Sci 73:84–97. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsv107
Kadri H, Marouani S, Saïdi B, Bradai MN, Bouaïn A, Morize E (2014) Age, growth, sexual maturity and reproduction of the thornback ray, Raja clavata (L.), of the Gulf of Gabès (south-Central Mediterranean Sea). Mar Biol Res 10(4):416–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/17451000.2013.797584
Kapiris K, Klaoudatos D (2011) Length-weight relationships for 21 fish species caught in the Argolikos gulf (Central Aegean Sea, eastern Mediterranean). Turk J Zool 35(5):717–723
Karakulak FS, Erk H, Bilgin B (2006) Length–weight relationships for 47 coastal fish species from the northern Aegean Sea. Turkey J Appl Ichthyol 22:274–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2006.00736.x
Kelleher K (2005) Discards in the World’s marine fisheries: an update. FAO fisheries and technical paper. No: 470. Rome, pp. 134
King M (1996) Fisheries biology assessment and management. Fishing News Books, Farnham
Özaydin O, Taskavak E (2006) Length–weight relationshipsfor 47 fish species from Izmir Bay (eastern Aegean Sea, Turkey). Acta Adriat 47(2):211–216
Özaydin O, Uçkun D, Akalın S, Leblebici S, Tosunoglu Z (2007) Length–weight relationships of fishes captured from Izmir Bay, Central Aegean Sea. J Appl Ichthyol 23:695–696
Paramo J, Motta J, Hoz JDL (2017) Population structure of grenadier fish Coelorinchus caelorhincus in deep waters of the Colombian Caribbean coast. Bol investig mar Costeras 46(1):153–170
Porcu C, Marongiu MF, Follesa MC, Bellodi A, Mulas A, Pesci P, Cau A (2014) Reproductive aspects of the velvet belly lantern shark Etmopterus spinax (Condrichthyes: Etmopteridae), from the central western Mediterranean Sea. Notes on gametogenesis and oviducal gland microstructure. Medit Mar Sci 15(2):313–326. https://doi.org/10.12681/mms.559
Roda MAP, Gilman E, Huntington T, Kennelly SJ, Suuronen P, Chaloupka M, Medley PA (2019) A third assessment of global marine fisheries discards. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper no. 633, Rome, 58 pp. http://www.fao.org/3/CA2905EN/ca2905en.pdf
Soykan O, Bakır K, Kınacıgil HT (2019) Demersal trawl discards with spatial and bathymetric emphasis in the Turkish coast of the Aegean Sea. Mar Biol Res 15(1):113–123
Tyler EHM, Somerfield PJ, Berghe EV, Bremner J, Jackson E, Langmead O, Palomares MLD, Webb TJ (2012) Extensive gaps and biases in our knowledge of a well-known fauna: implications for integrating biological traits into macroecology. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 21:922–934. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00726.x
Weatherley AH, Gill HS (1987) The biology of fish growth. Academic Press, London
Whitehead PJP, Mauchot ML, Hureau JC, Nielsen J, Tortonese E (1986) Fishes of the North-Eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean, Vol. I–III. UNESCO, Paris, p 1473
Yapıcı S, Filiz H (2014) Estimation of age, growth and reproduction of boarfish, Capros aper, in the South Aegean Sea. Pakistan J Zool 46(4):1061–1068
Yapıcı S, Karachle PK, Filiz H (2015) First length–weight relationships of 11 fish species in the Aegean Sea. J Appl Ichthyol 31(2):398–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.12459
Yığın C, İşmen A (2010) Age, growth, reproduction and feed of longnosed skate, Dipturus oxyrinchus (Linnaeus, 1758) in Saros Bay, the North Aegean Sea. J Appl Ichthyol 26:913–919. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2010.01510.x
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Soykan, O., Kınacıgil, H.T. Length–Weight Relationship of some Discarded Fish Species with Emphasis on Length at Maturity from the Central Aegean Sea, Turkey. Thalassas 37, 505–511 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41208-021-00291-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41208-021-00291-7