Introduction

Water is essential for human life; however, it is a limited resource that is getting scarce in numerous regions of the world. As the world's population continues to grow and climate change alters rainfall patterns, water scarcity is an issue of growing concern (Kalogirou 2005). According to the United Nations, more than 2 billion people do not have access to drinking water, and this number is expected to increase in the coming years (Delyannis 2003). In many parts of the world, water scarcity leads to crop failure, hunger and malnutrition (Delyannis and Belessiotis 2000). It also contributes to the spread of waterborne diseases. Several factors contribute to water scarcity around the world. Climate change is the main driver, with rising temperatures and changing rainfall patterns affecting water availability and quality in many regions (Tiwari et al. 2023). Population growth and urbanization also lead to an increased demand for water for drinking, sanitation and agriculture. Poor water management practices, including overexploitation of rivers and groundwater as well as pollution from industrial and agricultural activities, also exacerbate water scarcity (Sayigh 1989). However, solutions do exist, including better water management policies, investment in water infrastructure and adaptation to climate change, but the most promising and common solution is to harness the brackish water that covers around 70.2% of the earth's surface, and solar distillation is playing an increasingly crucial role in meeting the planet's water needs despite its modest productivity (Malik et al. 1982).

Solar distillation is a technique used to obtain purified water from salty or contaminated water (Tiwari and Tiwari 2007). This process uses solar energy to heat water; the solar still works by creating a greenhouse effect inside the container, which traps hot air and causes water to evaporate. Water vapor rises and condenses on the inner surface of the lid, which is cooler than the water, and the water drips into the collection unit (Malik et al. 1985). All impurities present in the original water source are removed, resulting in purified water. The solar still consists of a few basic parts, including a glass or plastic container, a condensation unit and a reflector to concentrate sunlight on the water (Anburaj et al. 2013).

Despite these advantages, solar distillation has certain limitations that should be addressed. The main challenge of this technology is the low productivity of solar units compared to other desalination systems (Nebbia and Nebbia-Menozzi 1966). Solar units have lower evaporation rates than other energy-intensive methods such as reverse osmosis (Talbert et al. 1970a). This means they take longer to produce the same amount of water, making them a less efficient solution for large-scale projects or densely populated areas (Delyannis 1967). The distillation process can also be improved by adding reflective material to the bottom of the vessel or by using a larger collection unit to increase the yield of purified water (Tleimat 1980). Innovative designs and modifications can also help improve solar still efficiency (Parekh et al. 2003). This work aims to highlight the process of solar desalination by describing some types of solar stills and their operation, discussing parameters that affect the operation of a solar still, reviewing some research work in this field, and making proposals about the future prospects of solar distillation technology (Arunkumar et al. 2019).

Literature review

The use of solar stills to obtain fresh water from seawater dates back several centuries, although they were used over 2000 years ago to produce salt rather than drinking water (Talbert et al. 1970b). However, recent advances in technology (Eibling et al. 1970) have led to the development of more compact and efficient solar stills to address the low-productivity problem (Kalidasa et al. 2013; Maalej 1991). Kalpesh and Kuldeep (2020) investigated how forced evaporation methods can be used to increase the efficiency of solar stills. These methods of increasing the evaporation surface area include the use of specific evaporation surfaces or capillary structures as well as the optimization of the geometric design (Chauhan et al. 2022). In the same vein of increasing the efficiency of solar distillers, research work has also focused on the integration of other solar thermal systems, such as solar distillers integrated with flat-plate solar collectors (Rai and Tiwari 1983; Badran et al. 2005), with a parabolic concentrator (Singh et al. 1996; Abdel-Rehim and Lasheen 2023), with evacuated tube collectors (Singh et al. 2013; Kumar et al. 2014b) or with a solar pool (Velmurugan et al. 2009a, 2009b). As part of the innovative research performed in this field, different shapes of top covers for solar stills, like spherical (Dhiman 1988), hemispherical (Arunkumar et al. 2012a), V-shaped (Selva Kumar et al. 2008), triangular prism (Wassouf et al. 2011) and pyramidal (triangular and square) (Kumar et al. 2014a), have been tried to improve their solar energy absorption as well as energy efficiency.

Solar distillation is a reliable and consistent method of water treatment (Garcia-Rodriguez 2003). The process is simple and easy to implement, requires minimal maintenance, and can produce clean water regardless of feed water quality (El-Dessouky and Ettouney 2000). The solar still method harnesses the sun's energy to create pure water (Tzen and Morris 2003). Evaporation and condensation are the fundamental concepts of any solar still. Salted water is put into the container, which is then exposed to the sun. The water in the container starts to evaporate when the sun heats it, leaving behind any impurities. The evaporated liquid then rises and condenses on the condenser's surface, where it is collected and cleaned (Shareef et al. 2018).

Types of distillers

Inclined-plane solar still

This is a passive solar still; two different processes occur in the same equipment, namely the distillation and the heat recovery process. One of the main advantages of this equipment is that it supplies the water tank at a lower cost due to its simple design, as shown in Fig. 1. It consists of a black-painted basin sealed within a fully airtight surface created from a clear glass or plastic cover (Retiel 2008). Solar radiation passes through the cover and is absorbed by the black basin. Following the absorption of solar radiation, the water in the pond evaporates. Steam rises until it hits the inside surface of the lid and condenses into clean water. After that, it flows along the lower surface of the lid and is collected using the droplets (Sathyamurthy et al. 2016).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Inclined-plane solar still

Aybar et al. (2005) experimentally studied an inclined solar still under the real environmental conditions in northern Cyprus.

The system consists of a flat and inclined solar absorption plate covered with glass, which creates a cavity. The absorber plate is made of galvanized steel and painted to form a matte black surface. However, all metal parts of the system that come into contact with water are made of stainless steel, copper or brass due to their better corrosion resistance. A black wick is placed on the absorber plate in order to evenly distribute the water on the plate and to increase the thickness of the water film. The absorber plate is insulated from below to prevent heat loss. The cavity is covered with 3-mm glass (with a transmissivity of about 0.88). The system is tilted at a 30° angle in order to run water over the absorber plate and increase the amount of solar radiation reaching the surface opening more frequently during the day. The system was tested with three variants: a bare plate, black fabric and black fleece. The effects of the wicks were observed. The rate of freshwater productivity increased by two to three times when wicks were used instead of a bare plate.

Cascading solar still

The waterfall solar distiller is a small water distiller powered by solar energy. It is designed to provide a solution to the problem of drinking water shortages in regions where access to drinking water is limited (Headley 1973). The principle of the cascading solar still is simple. It relies on the natural process of evaporation and condensation. Harnessing the power of the sun, the still heats the contaminated water, which then evaporates, leaving impurities. The difference from the flat still is that the absorber has a cascade structure. We find that if the body of water is tiny, the water heats up and evaporates faster (Velmurugan et al. 2008; Bernard 2004). The vapor then condenses on the inclined glass plates and this purified water flows down to be collected in a container (Khelif and Fethy 2000).

Khelif and Touati (2000) made an experimental study of a cascading solar still under the conditions in Adrar, Algeria. The system is shown in Fig. 2. It consists of a galvanized steel absorber formed of nine identical steps. This absorber contains a load of salt water and is covered with a transparent cover made of ordinary glass. The system is thermally insulated with a polystyrene coating and reinforced at the back with a second glass wool coating. On the edge surfaces are three holes connected with grooves. The first orifice is intended for supplying the distiller with salt water, the second for recovering the distillate, and the third for measuring and controlling the water level when the basin is full.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Cascading solar still

Khelif and Touati performed a detailed study of the parameters that characterize the cascade solar still. The study led to the suggestion of some methods of improving the efficiency of the system: reduce optical and thermal losses to the environment, promote condensation by controlling the cooling of the glazing, avoid salt deposition in the absorber basin by draining, and reduce the inertia of the system by using light materials.

Solar wick still

A solar wick still is a device that transforms salt water into drinking water using solar energy (Yeh and Chen 1986). The principle of operation is simple: the salt water is poured into the tank of the distiller, which is exposed to the rays of the sun. The latter heat the liquid, thus evaporating the water, which is then recovered in the form of vapor on a wick placed inside the device. This vapor then condenses on the cold wick, turning into pure, drinkable water (Arunkumar et al. 2012b).

The existence of the porous lining (wick) ensures slow circulation of the brackish water by drawing up the water, which increases the amount of energy it can absorb (Oualid 2009; Janarthanana et al. 2006).

Matrawy et al. (2015) made an experimental study of the wavy-wick-type solar still shown in Fig. 3 for comparison with a simple basin-type solar still. The main components of the proposed solar still are as follows: (1) a 6-mm-thick glass cover to transmit solar radiation incident on and reflected by the reflector to both a porous material and pond water (the steam generated condenses along the lower surface of the cover and is collected at the lower end); (2) a porous material made of 2-mm-thick black cloth in a corrugated form (the porous material is partially immersed in and wetted by the pool water via the capillary effect in order to increase the rate of evaporation); (3) a basin that contains the hot water; (4) the outer frame, a cubic wooden box with sides of 1.35 m, which is used to protect the system from the external ambient conditions; and (5) a flat, inclined stainless steel reflector 0.5 m in height and 0.8 m in width. The study led to the conclusion that the daily productivity of the solar wick was about 34% higher than that of the simple basin.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Wavy wick solar still

Spherical still

A spherical solar still is frequently used in desert regions. It is solar powered and uses the evaporation–condensation cycle to operate. The distiller receives water, which is heated by the rays of the sun, causing the evaporation of the water, which rises to the top of the sphere. When water vapor comes into contact with the cold, reflective surface of the sphere, it condenses and collects in a depression around the equator. Salt and other contaminants are then flushed out of the cleaned water and it is directed to a storage tank (Rabah 2012; Chaker and Menguy 2001).

Brahim and Chouchene (2014) conducted a study in Sousse, Tunisia, relating to the productivity and testing of a spherical solar still (shown in Fig. 4) for the productivity of water. The distiller consisted of an absorbent copper tank that was coated in black and had a surface area of 0.18 m2, a thickness of 2 mm, a thermal conductivity of 384 W m−1 K−1 and an absorption coefficient equal to 0.85; a plexiglass pane with an area of 0.785 m2, a thickness of 3 mm and a thermal conductivity of 0.19 W m−1 K−1; and expanded polystyrene insulation with a thickness of 2 cm and a thermal conductivity of 0.04 W m−1 K−1 that was used to avoid losses from the lower part of the tank. The results were taken over a period of 7 h in order to measure the daily productivity, which was approximately 0.8 L/day in this case.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Spherical solar still

From the interpretation of the experimental results obtained, the authors found that the productivity of distilled water obviously depended on the incident solar energy and the absorbing surface, and it allowed a distillate of very good quality to be obtained. There was also a strong temperature gradient between the water table and the glass, which promoted condensation and evaporation. A mathematical model where all the parameters characterizing the performance of the system are evaluated instantaneously during the period of sunshine can confirm the results of this study.

Vertical solar still

The vertical solar still is a device that uses the power of the sun to purify water. It consists of a clear, cone-shaped, upright plastic container that is placed over a basin of salty or contaminated water. Sunlight heats the water, causing it to evaporate and rise to the top of the cone. When it reaches the top, the water condenses on the plastic surface and drips into a collection basin, leaving behind contaminants and salt (Ameur and Ait Allaoua 2015; Tiwari 1992) (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Principle of operation of the vertical solar still

Boukar et al. (2007) constructed a single-effect indirect vertical solar still and experimented with it under the desert climate conditions of Adrar. This distiller is basically made up of a solar collector, a supply tank and a support. Tests carried out from December 2005 until February 2006 led to the conclusion that improvements in the the performance of the distiller could be achieved through the improvement of the design, the control of the brackish water supply and the improvement of the artifice used to track solar radiation.

Figures 5, 6 show the operating principle and the experimental setup, respectively.

Conditions that affect productivity

The selection of the type of solar still to use is mainly based on its productivity, which is impacted by several parameters (Shadi et al. 2016). In their review, Muftah et al. (2014) cited a number of factors (as shown in Fig. 6), including geographic location, general weather conditions, solar still design, position of the sun and exploitation technique.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Parameters affecting the productivity of solar stills

History of solar stills

In their review, Panchal and Patel (2017) studied the factors that affect the distillate productivity of a solar still. The most important factors are climate and design parameters. Solar still productivity was found to be directly correlated to total solar radiation, air temperature and wind speed.

Based on several research works (Selvaraj and Natarajan 2018; Velmurugan et al. 2008; Ghoneyem and Ileri 1997; Tiwari and Madhuri 1985; Manokar et al. 2014; Velmurugan and Srithar 2011; Abdenacer and Nafila 2007; Muftah et al. 2014; Nafey et al. 2000; Velmurugan et al. 2009c) that studied the parameters affecting the performance of a solar still, we can draw the following conclusions. The appropriate orientation of the glass cover depends on the latitude of the location. In northern latitudes it should be south facing, and in southern latitudes it should be north facing. The inclination of the cover should be optimized to maximize the rate of condensation of water on the lower surface of the cover and to collect the water without the mass of accumulated drops falling back into the basin. This therefore depends on the intensity of the solar radiation, the rates of evaporation and condensation, the material used for the cover, and its wetting properties. Lowering the cover temperature helps increase productivity. The temperature of the glass cover is reduced by having a film of cooling water flowing continuously over the glass or by having an intermittent flow of cooling water on the lid. The dependence of distillate productivity on water depth is strongly dependent on the initial water temperature in the basin. Still productivity decreases with increasing water depth during the day, but the reverse is the case with nighttime productivity. Still performance is associated with the thermal conductivity of the cover material. A thinner thickness of the condensation glass cover is preferable. Optimizing the tilt of the glass cover is very important for increasing productivity. It is suggested that a larger angle of coverage inclination is preferable in winter and a smaller angle is preferable in summer, and it is observed that the best angle of coverage inclination is close to that of the latitude of the location. Black granite gravel and black rocks are good energy-absorbing materials for storing solar energy and increasing productivity. The use of an asphalt basin coating increases the productivity of the solar as it presents higher absorption compared to black paint. The integration of the flat plate collector with the still increases its efficiency. The output of a multi-basin solar still is higher than that of single-basin still because of the greater difference between water temperature and glass cover temperature. The double-basin solar still coupled with vacuum tubes gives better performance.

Table 1 summarizes some research works that have studied the parameters that affect the productivity of a solar still.

Table 1 The parameters that affect the productivity of a solar still according to different researchers

Economic study

The economic analysis of a solar still is a crucial step in calculating the cost of producing distilled water and the time required to recover the investment (Mukherjee and Tiwari 1986). The cost of distilling water and its use determine the best return on a company's investment. To carry out an economic study, we propose the method of Kabeel et al. (2010); which is based on desalination unit cost analysis: the main calculation elements used in the cost analysis of the desalination unit are the CRF (capital recovery factor), FAC (fixed annual cost), SFF (sinking fund factor), ASV (annual salvage value), average annual productivity (M) and CA (annual cost). The annual maintenance cost (AMC) of a solar still covers regularly filling the still with brackish water, collecting distilled water, cleaning the glass cover, removing salt deposits (scaling) and maintaining the DC pump. The frequency of pond filling will decrease as the water depth increases. As a system ages, the amount of maintenance required increases. This is why the maintenance cost was calculated as 10% of the current net cost. The annual cost of the AC system is divided by the annual solar still yield (M), and the result is the CPL (cost of distilled water per liter). The parameters of the calculation described above can be represented as follows:

$${\text{CRF}} = i({1} + i)^{n} /[({1} + i)^{{n - {1}}} ]$$
$${\text{FAC}} = P \left( {{\text{CRF}}} \right)$$
$${\text{SFF}} = i/[({1} + i)^{{n - {1}}} ]$$
$$S = 0.{2} P$$
$${\text{ASV}} = \left( {{\text{SFF}}} \right) \, S$$
$${\text{AMC}} = 0.{\text{15 FAC}}$$
$${\text{AC}} = {\text{FAC}} + {\text{AMC}} {-} {\text{ASV}}$$
$${\text{CPL}} = {\text{AC}}/{\text{M}},$$

where P is the current capital cost of the desalination system; i is the interest per year, which is assumed to be 12%; and n is the number of years of life, assumed equal to 10 years in this analysis. Commodity prices depend on the country considered.

Conclusion

The solar still is an environmentally friendly solution to the problem of contaminated water. It requires no external power source and emits zero carbon emissions (Singh et al. 2020). It is easy to install and use, making it an ideal solution for rural areas where electricity is scarce. Additionally, it provides a long-term solution to the problem, as it requires minimal maintenance and has a long service life. The solar still is a great example of how we can harness the power of nature to provide sustainable solutions to the challenges we face. The performance and accessibility of solar stills can be significantly improved by taking into account the parameters influencing productivity (Kabeel et al. 2022). The creation of more efficient advanced collection materials, such as specific coatings or nanomaterials that can improve the condensation process and produce more water (Akkala et al. 2021), could make solar stills more portable and compact by increasing the distillation efficiency achieved with a smaller collection area (Mohammed and Mourad 2022). Research carried out into the use of sensor technology to automatically change the parameters according to the external circumstances shows that integrating sensors and automatic control systems into solar stills can improve their performance (Pisitsungkakarn and Neamyou 2022). Solar stills can also be used in conjunction with thermal storage systems, such as phase change materials or hot water tanks, to more efficiently use solar energy when the sun shines while allowing access to drinking water on cloudy days or at night. Using this method, solar stills would be more reliable and ideal for places with poor sunlight conditions.

The following conclusions were obtained upon analyzing the research works dealing with different aspects of the parameters influencing the productivity of solar stills:

  • Daily productivity increases when the water depth is reduced by 2 cm, but nighttime productivity decreases. On the other hand, when the water depth is increased, productivity increases at night and decreases during the day. Overall, a 2-cm depth is the best option for maximum productivity.

  • When the thickness of the glass is lower, the productivity increases. This is because of thee cooler temperature of the thinner glass, as there is more heat transfer with the outside environment and less radiation absorption inside the glass.