Abstract
Previous theoretical work suggests that happiness, life satisfaction, and positive affect are distinct. However, many recent research studies refer to these constructs interchangeably and mixed findings exist regarding their associations with alcohol and mental health outcomes. Thus, the purpose of this study was to explore the factor structure of positive affect, happiness, and life satisfaction and examine their associations with alcohol and mental health outcomes (i.e., alcohol consumption, drinking motives, depression, anxiety, and stress). Undergraduate students (N = 348; Mage=19.7 years; 74.6% women; 85.4% White) at a northeastern United States public university recruited via classroom announcements completed an online battery of self-report measures. A confirmatory factor analysis showed that modelling happiness, life satisfaction, and positive affect as three distinct factors provided optimal fit, χ2(149) = 409.31, p < .001, CFI = 0.98, RMSEA = 0.07, 90%CI [0.06, 0.08]. Happiness and life satisfaction were negatively associated with coping motives, while only life satisfaction was negatively associated with conformity motives. Happiness, life satisfaction, and positive affect were negatively associated with depressive symptoms and stress. Happiness and life satisfaction were negatively associated with anxiety symptoms. Findings of the current study highlight the distinct nature of positive psychological constructs: life satisfaction, subjective happiness and positive affect, and their differential link to alcohol use and mental health outcomes. Researchers should consider the differential nature of these positive constructs when selecting constructs to increase precision and promote clarity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
The prevalence of alcohol use disorder and mood and anxiety disorders are heightened in college students compared to non-college-attending peers of the same age (Blanco et al., 2008). College-aged young adults exhibit higher rates of risky alcohol use, binge drinking, and high-intensity drinking compared to other age groups (Schulenberg et al., 2021). Risky alcohol use among college students is associated with alcohol-related problems and engagement in other hazardous behaviors such as alcohol-induced memory impairment, drinking and driving, aggressive behavior, and sexual assault (Ashenhurst & Fromme, 2018). Additionally, numerous stressors may negatively impact the mental health of college students (Mahmoud et al., 2012). Stress, depression, and anxiety may be especially prominent due to frequent concerns about academic performance, pressure to succeed, and post-graduation plans (Beiter et al., 2015). Thus, it is important to identify relevant factors that may protect against risky alcohol use and negative mental health outcomes in college students.
Positive psychology is the study of “conditions and processes that contribute to the flourishing or optimal functioning of people, groups, and institutions” (Gable & Haidt, 2005, p. 104). One aspect of positive psychological research focuses on positive emotional constructs such as positive affect, happiness, and life satisfaction. Positive affect refers to one’s dynamic moods and emotions, which vary depending on context and as reactions to events (Diener et al., 1999), and reflects how much a person feels enthusiastic, alert, and active ((Watson et al., 1988a). Life satisfaction is defined as the stable, cognitive evaluation of satisfaction with one’s life. In contrast to the specific constructs of life satisfaction and positive affect, happiness is a more general construct which refers to how subjectively happy or unhappy one generally feels (Diener & Ryan, 2009; (Diener et al., 2009b; Lyubomirsky & Lepper, 1999). Happiness differs from life satisfaction and reflects overall quality of life, and affect, which is focused on emotions over a given period of time (Lyubomirsky & Lepper, 1999). These positive constructs are disparate from each other in the way that they can be experienced by individuals. For instance, people can feel dissatisfied with their life conditions (i.e., low life satisfaction) but still experience happiness or momentary positive affect. Thus, existing theoretical literature has established life satisfaction, positive affect, and happiness as distinct constructs. However, a critical limitation of the existing literature is inconsistency in how they are defined and conceptualized in empirical research. Many studies refer to these constructs interchangeably rather than separately assessing them (Donaldson et al., 2015). While moderate to strong correlations exist among happiness, life satisfaction, and positive and negative emotionality (Lyubomirsky & Lepper, 1999), this lack of precision may contribute to mixed findings regarding the association between these positive constructs and important health outcomes, such as alcohol and mental health outcomes.
Existing studies focusing on the association between positive constructs and alcohol use outcomes reveal conflicting findings. Positive affect and life satisfaction have been found to be negatively associated with alcohol use (Murphy et al., 2005; Saether et al., 2019; Wills et al., 1999), and prior-day alcohol use has been found to be negatively associated with next-day happiness (Harder et al., 2014; Lee et al., 2022). However, other studies have found a positive relationship between life satisfaction and alcohol use (Molnar et al., 2009) and some longitudinal studies have identified positive associations between positive affect and alcohol use (Hussong et al., 2001; Rankin & Maggs, 2006). Other studies have shown a non-linear association between life satisfaction and alcohol use. For instance, Koivumaa-Honkanen et al. (2012) reported a J-shaped association, wherein life satisfaction was higher for people who consumed low amounts of alcohol compared to those who either consumed high amounts of alcohol or were abstinent from alcohol. Massin and Kopp (2014) described an inverse J-shaped relationship between life satisfaction and alcohol use among men (i.e., men who reported the most alcohol consumption exhibited lower life satisfaction than men who abstained from alcohol) and an inverse U-shaped relationship among women (i.e., women who reported the most alcohol use exhibited lower satisfaction compared to women who drank less alcohol yet higher satisfaction compared to women who abstained from alcohol). Conversely, alcohol use has been found to have no relationship with happiness (Zhou et al., 2015) and life satisfaction (Clifford et al., 1991; Murphy et al., 2006). These inconsistent findings may be a result of imprecision in the definitions and measurement of these positive constructs and point to a need for research focusing on their distinction in relation to alcohol outcomes.
Findings on the associations between these positive constructs and mental health outcomes have been more uniform, with research generally finding that they are important for good mental health (Rosenfeld, 2019), though some of these findings have also been inconsistent. Happiness and life satisfaction have been found to be negatively associated with depression, anxiety, and stress in college students (Mahmoud et al., 2012; Wong, 2010). Indeed, life satisfaction is positively associated with good mental health outcomes even after controlling for factors such as income, general health, and gender (Lombardo et al., 2018). Life satisfaction has been found to be negatively associated with anxiety in college students (Mahmoud et al., 2015), though another study found that life satisfaction was not associated with worry and anxious arousal (Carver et al., 2021). An inverse relationship between positive emotions and stress has been found in college students (Çivitci, 2015), perhaps because positive affect helps people cope with stress over time (Folkman & Moskowitz, 2007). Decreased positive affect is a common effect of anxiety (Eisner et al., 2009) and depression (Brown et al., 1998; Clark & Watson, 1991), and college students with more intense and frequent experiences of positive affect tend to report lower depressive symptoms (Schick & Spillane, under review). While these findings between positive constructs and mental health outcomes are more consistent compared to alcohol outcomes, it is important to further refine our understanding of these positive constructs to more accurately identify mechanisms through which these outcomes can be targeted.
Previous theoretical work suggests that happiness, life satisfaction, and positive affect are distinct constructs. However, many recent research studies refer to them interchangeably (Donaldson et al., 2015) and mixed findings exist regarding their associations with alcohol and mental health outcomes. To promote precision in research, we aim to (1) statistically validate if happiness, life satisfaction, and positive affect are distinct factors and (2) determine if they are differentially related to alcohol and mental health outcomes. Increased clarity regarding the relations among these positive constructs and college student alcohol and mental health has the potential to inform treatment development, ultimately improving college student health.
2 Materials and Methods
2.1 Participants and Procedures
This study represents a secondary analysis of data collected from undergraduate students at a public university in the northeastern United States for a larger study examining the associations among stress, positive emotions, and alcohol use (Schick et al., 2023). Participants were recruited through online advertisements and announcements in classes in Spring 2018. Those interested in participating utilized a link within the advertisement to access a Qualtrics survey, at which point they were asked to read a consent form and confirm their willingness to participate by selecting “yes” at the bottom of the form. Participants who provided consent to participate were asked to complete the online Qualtrics survey, which took approximately 30 min to complete, and participants did not receive any compensation for completing the survey. No identifying information was collected during this study and all study procedures were approved by the University of Rhode Island Institutional Review Board. A total of 350 students provided informed consent and completed study questionnaires. The average age of the sample was 19.7 years (SD = 2.13; range: 18–40 years). Most participants identified as women (74.6%), non-Hispanic (93.4%), and White (85.4%), and were in their freshman (42.0%) or sophomore (26.0%) years of college. Sample demographic characteristics are summarized in Table 1. All data and code related to this manuscript can be found via Open Science Framework at https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/5ZWFU.
2.2 Measures
2.2.1 Positive Construct Measures
Positive affect was measured using the positive affect subscale of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS-PA; Watson et al., 1988a). The PANAS-PA includes 10 items measuring the intensity with which individuals have experienced a range of positive emotions over the preceding week. Participants rate each item based on the extent to which they have felt each of the emotions with five possible response options (1 = very slightly or not at all, 5 = extremely) for a possible total score between 10 and 50, with higher scores indicating higher intensity of positive affective experiences over the preceding week. The PANAS is considered the “gold standard” for the measurement of positive affect and has been shown to have good psychometric properties (Crispim et al., 2014); internal consistency in the present sample was excellent, Cronbach’s α = 0.90.
Subjective happiness was measured using the Subjective Happiness Scale (Lyubomirsky & Lepper, 1999), a 4-item measure of overall subjective happiness, happiness relative to peers, and participants’ characterization of themselves as a generally happy or unhappy person. Participants rate each item based on whether they perceive themselves to fall on a seven-point scale (i.e., one item has anchor points of 1 = much less happy and 7 = much more happy). Items are summed to produce a total score with possible scores ranging from 7 to 28, with higher scores indicating greater subjective happiness. Internal consistency in this sample was good, Cronbach’s α = 0.87.
Life satisfaction was measured using the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS; Diener et al., 1985a), Diener et al., 1985a> 5-item measure assessing the degree to which participants perceive their life conditions as positive. Participants rate each item based on the extent to which they agree with each statement according to seven possible response options (1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree). Item scores are summed to create a total score ranging from 5 to 35, with higher scores indicating greater life satisfaction. Internal consistency in the present sample was excellent, Cronbach’s α = 0.91.
2.2.2 Alcohol Outcome Measures
Alcohol consumption was measured using open-ended questions regarding past-month frequency and quantity of alcohol use. For the present analyses, items regarding drinking frequency (i.e. “in the past month, on average how many days did you drink alcohol?”) were multiplied by drinking quantity (i.e. “in the past month, on average how many drinks did you have each time you drank?”) to create a total consumption score reflecting approximate number of alcoholic drinks consumed per month. This derived score has been used previously in extant research (Beard et al., 2019; Lima et al., 2005; Schick et al., 2022), with higher total scores reflecting greater alcohol consumption.
Drinking motives were measured using the Drinking Motives Questionnaire – Revised (DMQ-R; Cooper 1994). The DMQ-R includes 20 items across four subscales reflecting reasons for alcohol use (i.e., social, coping, enhancement, and conformity). Participants rate each item based on how frequently they drink for each reason with five possible response options (1 = almost never/never, 5 = almost always/always). Subscale scores are created by summing appropriate items, with higher scores indicating more frequent endorsement of drinking due to each motive. Cronbach’s alphas in the present study were good, α = 0.90, 0.88, 0.86, and 0.86 for the social, coping, enhancement, and conformity motive subscales, respectively.
2.2.3 Mental Health Outcome Measures
Depressive symptoms were measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9; Kroenke & Spitzer 2002), a self-report measure assessing depressive symptoms over the preceding two weeks. Participants rate each item based on the extent to which they have been bothered by each symptom in the past two weeks with four possible response options (0 = not at all, 3 = nearly every day). Item scores are summed to create a total scale score ranging from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating greater depressive symptom severity. Internal consistency in this sample was good, Cronbach’s α = 0.89.
Anxiety symptoms were measured using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7; Spitzer et al., 2006), a self-report measure assessing anxiety symptoms over the preceding two weeks. Participants rate each item based on the extent to which they have been bothered by each symptom in the past two weeks with four possible response options (0 = not at all, 3 = nearly every day). Item scores are summed to create a total scale score ranging from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety symptom severity. Internal consistency in this sample was excellent, Cronbach’s α = 0.90.
Perceived stress was measured using the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS; Cohen et al., 1983), a 10-item self-report measure assessing the degree to which situations in one’s life are appraised as stressful. Participants rate each item based on the extent to which each statement has been true for them in the preceding month with five possible response options (0 = never, 4 = very often). Appropriate items are reverse scored, then all items are summed to create a total scale score ranging from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating higher levels of perceived stress in the past month. Internal consistency in this sample was good, Cronbach’s α = 0.88.
2.3 Data Analytic Strategy
First, two confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models were examined in Mplus version 7.1 (Muthén & Muthén, 1998) using weighted least squares estimation method (WLSMV). WLSMV was utilized due to the ordinal nature of item responses (i.e., Likert-type scales) and has been shown to be less biased and more accurate than robust maximum likelihood in estimating factor loadings for ordinal data (Li, 2016). The first model estimated a three-factor structure, with each scales’ respective items loading onto separate factors. The second model estimated a bifactor model in which an overall positive construct variable as a general factor under which the three scales were subsumed. Overall model fit was assessed using the likelihood ratio test based on the chi-square value. A nonsignificant likelihood ratio test indicated good model fit. However, because the chi-square test rejects even adequately fitting models (Hu & Bentler, 1999), fit indices based on the chi-square distribution were also used to assess model fit. Specifically, the comparative fit index greater than 0.95 (CFI; Bentler 1990) and root mean square error of approximation value below 0.10 (RMSEA; Steiger 1990) with accompanying 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were also used to indicate good model fit. Agreement among fit indices provides evidence that at least adequate model fit was achieved (Kline, 2016).
Next, using SPSS v. 27.0, we examined scores on study variables of interest to assess adherence to assumptions of normality. We examined bivariate correlations between variables representing positive constructs (i.e., positive affect, subjective happiness, life satisfaction), alcohol use outcomes (i.e., alcohol consumption, drinking motives), and mental health outcomes (i.e., depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, stress) to examine their interrelations. Magnitude of correlations was interpreted based on the following guidelines by Mukaka (2012): below 0.30 is very small, 0.30 to 0.50 is small, 0.50 to 0.70 is moderate, and above 0.70 is large. In any cases where multiple positive constructs emerged as significantly correlated with an outcome, we entered all positive constructs into a multiple linear regression model to examine their relative contributions to each respective outcome.
Finally, we conducted sensitivity analyses to examine the effects of age and gender on the associations between positive constructs and alcohol and mental health outcomes. We examined bivariate correlations among age, gender, and alcohol and mental health outcomes. Then, for any cases where multiple positive constructs and either age or gender were significantly correlated with an outcome, we entered all positive constructs, age, and gender into a multiple linear regression model to examine their relative contributions to each respective outcome.
3 Results
3.1 Confirmatory Factor Analysis Results
The three-factor model comprising factors representing positive affect, subjective happiness, and life satisfaction provided good fit to the data, χ2(149) = 409.31, p < .001, CFI = 0.98, RMSEA = 0.07, 90% CI [0.06, 0.08]. The model comprising of a bifactor solution provided worse fit to the data, χ2(137) = 1292.66, p < .001, CFI = 0.89, RMSEA = 0.16, 90% CI [0.15, 0.16]. Thus, the solution modeling three distinct factors was retained. See Table 2 for factor loadings derived from the confirmatory factor analysis conducted assuming a three-factor solution. The positive affect, subjective happiness, and life satisfaction scales were found to have acceptable reliability in the present sample, Cronbach’s α’s = 0.90, 0.87 and 0.91, respectively. Pearson product-moment correlations revealed significant positive correlations of moderate magnitude between the three scales (see Table 3).
3.2 Relation to Alcohol Use Outcomes
Pearson product-moment correlations (see Table 3) revealed that only life satisfaction was significantly correlated, with a very small magnitude, with past-month alcohol consumption. All positive constructs were significantly negatively related to coping drinking motives with a small magnitude, both subjective happiness and life satisfaction were significantly negatively related to conformity motives with a very small magnitude, and only subjective happiness was negatively related to social drinking motives with a very small magnitude. No positive constructs were significantly correlated with enhancement drinking motives.
Multiple linear regression analyses (see Table 4) predicting coping drinking motives revealed that, when all three positive constructs are entered into a model together, only subjective happiness (β = − 0.22, p = .01) and life satisfaction (β = − 0.20, p = .01) emerged as significant predictors (model R2 = 0.14, f2 = 0.16). In a model predicting conformity drinking motives, only life satisfaction (β = − 0.17, p = .046) emerged as a significant predictor (model R2 = 0.04, f2 = 0.04).
3.3 Relation to Mental Health Outcomes
Pearson product-moment correlations (see Table 3) revealed that all positive constructs were significantly negatively correlated with depressive symptoms with a moderate magnitude, anxiety symptoms with a small to moderate magnitude, and perceived stress with a moderate magnitude. Multiple linear regression analyses (see Table 4) predicting depressive symptoms revealed that, when all three positive constructs are entered into a model together, positive affect (β = − 0.20, p < .001), subjective happiness (β = − 0.30, p < .001), and life satisfaction (β = − 0.28, p < .001) emerged as significant predictors (model R2 = 0.46, f2 = 0.85). In a model predicting anxiety symptoms, only subjective happiness (β = − 0.38, p < .001) and life satisfaction (β = − 0.20, p = .002) emerged as significant predictors (model R2 = 0.28, f2 = 0.39). Finally, in a model predicting perceived stress, positive affect (β = − 0.20, p < .001), subjective happiness (β = − 0.25, p < .001), and life satisfaction (β = − 0.30, p < .001) emerged as significant predictors (model R2 = 0.42, f2 = 0.72).
3.4 Sensitivity Analyses
Bivariate correlations among age, gender, and alcohol and mental health outcomes (see Supplemental Table 1) revealed that age was significantly negatively correlated with social drinking motives, and being a woman was significantly negatively correlated with past-month alcohol consumption and significantly positively correlated with anxiety symptoms and perceived stress (all with very small magnitudes). Age and gender were not significantly correlated with any of the three positive constructs. Follow-up multiple linear regression analyses (see Supplemental Table 2) revealed that, controlling for age and gender, subjective happiness (β = − 0.42, p < .001) and life satisfaction (β = − 0.17, p < .001) remained significantly associated with anxiety symptoms (model R2 = 0.31, f2 = 0.45), while positive affect (β = − 0.15, p = .001), subjective happiness (β = − 0.35, p < .001), and life satisfaction (β = − 0.31, p < .001) remained significantly associated with perceived stress (model R2 = 0.48, f2 = 0.92).
4 Discussion
The purpose of this study was to examine the factor structure underlying subjective happiness, life satisfaction and positive affect, and their differential relationships with alcohol and mental health outcomes. First, we found evidence that these constructs may be best conceptualized as three distinct factors, rather than reflecting some underlying overall positive construct. This finding is in response to previous calls for clarity regarding the distinction between various positive psychological constructs and may help to explain the reasons for the mixed findings observed with respect to the associations between these constructs and clinically relevant outcomes. The growing field of positive psychology has received critiques regarding its conceptual and scientific rigor (Aspinwall & Tedeschi, 2010; Lazarus, 2003). As the field continues to expand (Donaldson et al., 2015), clarity and accuracy in construct measurement will be vital to promote rigor, increase the reach of research findings, and move towards the stated goal of the field to increase understanding of factors that promote individuals’ flourishing (Seligman & Csikszentmihalyi, 2014). Indeed, scientific rigor is the key separation of positive psychology from folk wisdom and popular ideas about positive thinking (Diener, 2003; Peterson & Park, 2003).
Next, we found that positive affect, subjective happiness, and life satisfaction emerged as differential predictors of alcohol-related outcomes. Specifically, at zero-order, only life satisfaction was significantly and negatively related to past-month alcohol consumption, only subjective happiness was significantly and negatively related to social motives for drinking, and only subjective happiness and life satisfaction were significantly and negatively related to conformity motives for drinking. All three positive constructs were significantly and negatively related to coping drinking motives at zero-order. In multivariate models including all positive constructs, life satisfaction emerged as the strongest predictor of both conformity drinking motives, while subjective happiness was the strongest predictor of coping drinking motives. It is interesting to note that coping and conformity motives represent avoidance-type motives for drinking under Cooper’s (1994) motivational model of alcohol use. It may be that those individuals who are more satisfied with their lives and happier are less likely to engage in avoidance-type behaviors overall. However, additional research is needed to explore the reason for this finding. While previous work has focused on well-being overall in relation to drinking motives (Appleton et al., 2018), this finding suggests that future work may benefit from more thoroughly examining the link between life satisfaction, happiness and drinking motives. Interestingly, a larger proportion of variance was accounted for by the positive constructs in the model predicting coping drinking motives compared to the model predicting conformity drinking motives; this may be related to the emotion-focused nature of coping motives (Cooper et al., 2000). Further, with the exception of a significant correlation with coping drinking motives, positive affect was not significantly related to any alcohol use outcomes. This finding may reflect the state-based and momentary nature of positive affect, whereas subjective happiness and life satisfaction are conceptualized as being more stable traits (Diener et al., 2009a, b). It may be that momentary states, such as positive affect, are more likely to predict momentary alcohol use and motives for that specific episode of alcohol use rather than average levels of alcohol use reported retrospectively.
Findings regarding the association between positive psychological constructs and mental health outcomes were more consistent, and the positive constructs accounted for a much larger proportion of the variance in outcomes compared to the models focused on alcohol-related outcomes. Positive affect, subjective happiness and life satisfaction were significantly and negatively related to depressive symptoms and stress in both bivariate and multivariate models, consistent with previous literature (Koivumaa-Honkanen et al., 2004; Pompili et al., 2016; Werner-Seidler et al., 2013). Each positive psychological construct was significantly related to anxiety symptoms at zero-order, but in multivariate models including all three positive psychological construct, only subjective happiness and life satisfaction remained significant predictors. Further, findings regarding anxiety and perceived stress remained consistent in sensitivity analyses after controlling for age and gender. Similar to our findings regarding links with alcohol use, it may be that the momentary nature of positive affect would be more likely to be associated with momentary, or even within-day, measures of mental health symptomatology. Indeed, previous work has found that frequency of positive emotions, not intensity (as is measured by the PANAS; Watson et al., 1988b), is related to overall well-being and good mental health (Diener et al., 1985b, 2009a). If this is the case, it would support the need for investigations using intensive longitudinal (e.g., experience sampling) methodologies to examine these temporal associations as they unfold in individuals’ daily lives, rather than relying on retrospective, cross-sectional examinations of correlates of positive emotions.
Findings of the present study have important implications for both research and clinical practice. First, they speak to the need for increased precision when considering positive psychological constructs in research given their theoretical and, now, empirically-supported distinction. Our finding that these constructs are differentially related to outcomes suggest that failure to thoroughly consider which positive construct researchers mean to measure may contribute to the previously observed mixed findings regarding their associations with important clinically relevant outcomes (Donaldson et al., 2015; Krentzman, 2013). Our finding that positive psychological constructs were negatively associated with various alcohol and mental health outcomes also suggests that positive psychological interventions (PPIs) may be a useful avenue for improving college students’ alcohol and mental health outcomes. Meta-analytic reviews examining the efficacy of PPIs have found strong support for their use to reduce depressive symptoms and that these effects last over time (Bolier et al., 2013; Sin & Lyubomirsky, 2009). More preliminary work has found evidence to suggest that PPIs may also be useful to target alcohol consumption (Akhtar & Boniwell, 2010), anxiety symptoms (Brown et al., 2019), and stress (Matvienko-Sikar & Dockray, 2017). Further work is needed to explore the efficacy of these interventions for a wider range of outcomes other than depression, and to better understand what specific positive construct is impacted by PPIs and is associated with changes in outcomes.
While results of the present study are novel and contribute to our understanding of the role of positive psychological constructs in relation to alcohol and mental health outcomes, findings should be considered within the context of the study’s limitations. First, the cross-sectional and correlational study design precludes the ability to draw causal inferences or predictive conclusions from the data (Solem, 2015). Additional data from longitudinal studies would be useful to further examine the interrelation between positive psychological constructs and to clarify the role of positive psychological constructs in alcohol and mental health outcomes, including examining how variations in these variables over time and in different contexts relate to outcomes. Second, the majority of participants were non-Hispanic women in their first two years of college. This limits the generalizability of the study, especially given work suggesting age, race, and gender differences in alcohol use and mental health symptomatology (Chen & Dagher, 2016; Maguen et al., 2010; White, 2020). However, it is also important to note that recent literature has called for interventions focused on reducing alcohol use among women in particular (White, 2020), necessitating the examination of factors that influence risk for alcohol use in samples largely comprised of women. Nevertheless, future studies should focus on obtaining a more generalizable sample to understand the extent to which these results are applicable to a wider population.
Findings of the current study highlight the distinct nature of positive psychological constructs: life satisfaction, subjective happiness and positive affect, and their differential link to alcohol use and mental health outcomes. Additional work is needed to further explore the association between these constructs and clinically relevant outcomes. Such work will increase precision in research and better inform how positive psychological interventions can be leveraged to help individuals flourish and reduce alcohol use and mental health concerns.
References
Akhtar, M., & Boniwell, I. (2010). Applying positive psychology to alcohol-misusing adolescents. Groupwork, 20(3), 6–31. https://doi.org/10.1921/gpwk.v20i3.707
Appleton, A., James, R., & Larsen, J. (2018). The Association between Mental Wellbeing, levels of Harmful drinking, and drinking motivations: A cross-sectional study of the UK Adult Population. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 15(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15071333
Ashenhurst, J. R., & Fromme, K. (2018). Alcohol use and consequences across developmental transitions during college and beyond. In Alcohol Use Disorders. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190676001.003.0015
Aspinwall, L. G., & Tedeschi, R. G. (2010). The value of positive psychology for health psychology: Progress and pitfalls in examining the relation of positive phenomena to health. Ann Behav Med, 39(1), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-009-9153-0
Beard, E., Brown, J., West, R., Kaner, E., Meier, P., & Michie, S. (2019). Associations between socio-economic factors and alcohol consumption: A population survey of adults in England. PloS one, 14(2), e0209442. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209442
Beiter, R., Nash, R., McCrady, M., Rhoades, D., Linscomb, M., Clarahan, M., & Sammut, S. (2015). The prevalence and correlates of depression, anxiety, and stress in a sample of college students. J Affect Disord, 173, 90–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2014.10.054
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull, 107(2), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
Blanco, C., Okuda, M., Wright, C., Hasin, D. S., Grant, B. F., Liu, S. M., & Olfson, M. (2008). Mental health of college students and their non-college-attending peers: Results from the national epidemiologic study on Alcohol and related conditions. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 65(12), 1429–1437. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.65.12.1429
Bolier, L., Haverman, M., Westerhof, G. J., Riper, H., Smit, F., & Bohlmeijer, E. (2013). Positive psychology interventions: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. BMC Public Health, 13, 119. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-119
Brown, T. A., Chorpita, B. F., & Barlow, D. H. (1998). Structural relationships among dimensions of the DSM-IV anxiety and mood disorders and dimensions of negative affect, positive affect, and autonomic arousal. Journal of abnormal psychology, 107(2), 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.107.2.179
Brown, L., Ospina, J. P., Celano, C. M., & Huffman, J. C. (2019). The Effects of positive psychological interventions on medical patients’ anxiety: A Meta-analysis. Psychosom Med, 81(7), 595–602. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0000000000000722
Carver, K., Ismail, H., Reed, C., Hayes, J., Alsaif, H., Villanueva, M., & Sass, S. (2021). High levels of anxiety and psychological well-being in college students: A dual factor model of mental health approach. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 5(1), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.47602/jpsp.v5i1.242
Chen, J., & Dagher, R. (2016). Gender and Race/Ethnicity differences in Mental Health Care Use before and during the great recession. J Behav Health Serv Res, 43(2), 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-014-9403-1
Çivitci, A. (2015). The moderating role of positive and negative affect on the relationship between perceived social support and stress in college students. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 15(3).
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1991). Tripartite model of anxiety and depression: Psychometric evidence and taxonomic implications. J Abnorm Psychol, 100(3), 316–336. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-843x.100.3.316
Clifford, P. R., Edmundson, E. W., Koch, W. R., & Dodd, B. G. (1991). Drug use and life satisfaction among college students. Int J Addict, 26(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.3109/10826089109056238
Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav, 24(4), 385–396. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6668417
Cooper, M. L. (1994). Motivations for alcohol use among adolescents: Development and validation of a four-factor model. Psychological assessment, 6(2), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.2.117
Cooper, M. L., Agocha, V. B., & Sheldon, M. S. (2000). A motivational perspective on risky behaviors: The role of personality and affect regulatory processes. Journal of Personality, 68, 1059–1088. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00126
Crispim, A. C., Archer, A. B., & Cruz, R. M. (2014). Methodological issues about affect: A systematic review about assessment tests of affect. International Journal of Education and Social Science, 1(3), 118–126.
Diener, E. (2003). What is positive about positive psychology: The curmudgeon and Pollyanna. Psychological inquiry, 14(2), 115–120. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1449816
Diener, E., & Ryan, K. (2009). Subjective well-being: A general overview. South African journal of psychology, 39(4), 391–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/008124630903900402
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985a). The satisfaction with Life Scale. J Pers Assess, 49(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
Diener, E., Larsen, R. J., Levine, S., & Emmons, R. A. (1985b). Intensity and frequency: Dimensions underlying positive and negative affect. J Pers Soc Psychol, 48(5), 1253–1265. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.48.5.1253
Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276
Diener, E., Sandvik, E., & Pavot, W. (2009a). Happiness is the frequency, not the intensity, of positive versus negative affect. In E. Diener (Ed.), Assessing well-being: The collected works of Ed Diener (pp. 213–231). Springer Science + Business Media.
Diener, E., Scollon, C. N., & Lucas, R. E. (2009b). The evolving concept of subjective well-being: The multifaceted nature of happiness. In E. Diener (Ed.), Assessing well-being: The collected works of Ed Diener (pp. 67–100). Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2354-4_4
Donaldson, S. I., Dollwet, M., & Rao, M. A. (2015). Happiness, excellence, and optimal human functioning revisited: Examining the peer-reviewed literature linked to positive psychology. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(3), 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.943801
Eisner, L. R., Johnson, S. L., & Carver, C. S. (2009). Positive affect regulation in anxiety disorders. J Anxiety Disord, 23(5), 645–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.02.001
Folkman, S., & Moskowitz, J. T. (2007). Positive affect and meaning-focused coping during significant psychological stress. In M. Hewstone, H. A. W. Schut, J. B. F. De Wit, K. Van Den Bos, & M. S. Stroebe (Eds.), The scope of social psychology: Theory and applications (pp. 193–208). Psychology Press.
Gable, S. L., & Haidt, J. (2005). What (and why) is positive psychology? Review of general psychology, 9(2), 103–110.
Harder, V. S., Ayer, L. A., Rose, G. L., Naylor, M. R., & Helzer, J. E. (2014). Alcohol, moods and male-female differences: Daily interactive voice response over 6 months. Alcohol Alcohol, 49(1), 60–65. https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agt069
Hu, L. t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Hussong, A. M., Hicks, R. E., Levy, S. A., & Curran, P. J. (2001). Specifying the relations between affect and heavy alcohol use among young adults. Journal of abnormal psychology, 110(3), 449. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.110.3.449
Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
Koivumaa-Honkanen, H., Kaprio, J., Honkanen, R., Viinamaki, H., & Koskenvuo, M. (2004). Life satisfaction and depression in a 15-year follow-up of healthy adults. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol, 39(12), 994–999. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-004-0833-6
Koivumaa-Honkanen, H., Kaprio, J., Korhonen, T., Honkanen, R. J., Heikkila, K., & Koskenvuo, M. (2012). Self-reported life satisfaction and alcohol use: A 15-year follow-up of healthy adult twins. Alcohol Alcohol, 47(2), 160–168. https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agr151
Krentzman, A. R. (2013). Review of the application of positive psychology to substance use, addiction, and recovery research. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 27(1), 151–165. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029897
Kroenke, K., & Spitzer, R. L. (2002). The PHQ-9: A new depression diagnostic and severity measure. In (Vol. 32, pp. 509–515): SLACK Incorporated Thorofare, NJ.
Lazarus, R. S. (2003). Does the positive psychology movement have legs? Psychological inquiry, 14(2), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1402_02
Lee, S. S., Yu, K., Choi, E., & Choi, I. (2022). To drink, or to exercise: That is (not) the question! Daily effects of alcohol consumption and exercise on well-being. Appl Psychol Health Well Being, 14(2), 555–571. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12319
Li, C. H. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behav Res Methods, 48(3), 936–949. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7
Lima, C. T., Freire, A. C., Silva, A. P., Teixeira, R. M., Farrell, M., & Prince, M. (2005). Concurrent and construct validity of the audit in an urban brazilian sample. Alcohol Alcohol, 40(6), 584–589. https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agh202
Lombardo, P., Jones, W., Wang, L., Shen, X., & Goldner, E. M. (2018). The fundamental association between mental health and life satisfaction: Results from successive waves of a canadian national survey. BMC Public Health, 18(1), 342. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5235-x
Lyubomirsky, S., & Lepper, H. S. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46(2), 137–155. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006824100041
Maguen, S., Ren, L., Bosch, J. O., Marmar, C. R., & Seal, K. H. (2010). Gender differences in mental health diagnoses among Iraq and Afghanistan veterans enrolled in veterans affairs health care. Am J Public Health, 100(12), 2450–2456. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.166165
Mahmoud, J. S., Staten, R., Hall, L. A., & Lennie, T. A. (2012). The relationship among young adult college students’ depression, anxiety, stress, demographics, life satisfaction, and coping styles. Issues Ment Health Nurs, 33(3), 149–156. https://doi.org/10.3109/01612840.2011.632708
Mahmoud, J. S., Staten, R. T., Lennie, T. A., & Hall, L. A. (2015). The relationships of coping, negative thinking, life satisfaction, social support, and selected demographics with anxiety of young adult college students. J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs, 28(2), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcap.12109
Massin, S., & Kopp, P. (2014). Is life satisfaction hump-shaped with alcohol consumption? Evidence from russian panel data. Addictive Behaviors, 39(4), 803–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.01.005
Matvienko-Sikar, K., & Dockray, S. (2017). Effects of a novel positive psychological intervention on prenatal stress and well-being: A pilot randomised controlled trial. Women and Birth, 30(2), e111-e118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2016.10.003
Molnar, D. S., Busseri, M. A., Perrier, C. P., & Sadava, S. W. (2009). A longitudinal examination of alcohol use and subjective well-being in an undergraduate sample. J Stud Alcohol Drugs, 70(5), 704–713. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2009.70.704
Mukaka, M. M. (2012). A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi medical journal, 24(3), 69–71.
Murphy, J. G., McDevitt-Murphy, M. E., & Barnett, N. P. (2005). Drink and be merry? Gender, life satisfaction, and alcohol consumption among college students. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 19(2), 184–191. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-164X.19.2.184
Murphy, J. G., Hoyme, C. K., Colby, S. M., & Borsari, B. (2006). Alcohol consumption, alcohol-related problems, and quality of life among college students. Journal of college student development, 47(1), 110–121.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998). Mplus: The comprehensive modeling program for applied researchers: User’s guide. Muthén & Muthén.
Peterson, C., & Park, N. (2003). Positive psychology as the evenhanded positive psychologist views it. Psychological inquiry, 14(2), 143–147. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1449822
Pompili, M., Innamorati, M., Lamis, D. A., Lester, D., Di Fiore, E., Giordano, G., Ricci, F., Erbuto, D., Tambelli, R., & Balestrieri, M. (2016). The interplay between suicide risk, cognitive vulnerability, subjective happiness and depression among students. Current Psychology, 35(3), 450–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-015-9313-2
Rankin, L. A., & Maggs, J. L. (2006). First-year college student affect and alcohol use: Paradoxical within-and between-person associations. Journal of youth and adolescence, 35(6), 925–937. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-006-9073-2
Rosenfeld, A. J. (2019). The neuroscience of happiness and Well-Being: What brain findings from Optimism and Compassion Reveal. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am, 28(2), 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chc.2018.11.002
Saether, S. M. M., Knapstad, M., Askeland, K. G., & Skogen, J. C. (2019). Alcohol consumption, life satisfaction and mental health among norwegian college and university students. Addict Behav Rep, 10, 100216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abrep.2019.100216
Schick, M. R., & Spillane, N. S. (under review). Heterogeneity in experiences of positive emotionality among college students: A latent profile analysis.
Schick, M. R., Nalven, T., & Spillane, N. S. (2022). Drinking to fit in: The Effects of drinking motives and self-esteem on Alcohol Use among Female College Students. Subst Use Misuse, 57(1), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2021.1990334
Schick, M. R., Spillane, N. S., & Breines, J. G. (2023). The role of positive affect in the association between stress and college student alcohol use. Journal of American College Health, 71(1), 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2021.1891075
Schulenberg, J. E., Patrick, M. E., Johnston, L. D., O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Miech, R. A. (2021). Monitoring the Future National Survey results on Drug Use, 1975–2020. Volume II, College Students & adults Ages 19–60. Institute for Social Research. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED615085.pdf
Seligman, M. E., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). Positive psychology: An introduction. In Flow and the foundations of positive psychology (pp. 279–298). Springer.
Sin, N. L., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2009). Enhancing well-being and alleviating depressive symptoms with positive psychology interventions: A practice-friendly meta-analysis. J Clin Psychol, 65(5), 467–487. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20593
Solem, R. C. (2015). Limitation of a cross-sectional study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 148(2), 205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.05.006
Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. B., & Lowe, B. (2006). A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: The GAD-7. Arch Intern Med, 166(10), 1092–1097. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092
Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval Estimation Approach. Multivariate Behav Res, 25(2), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988a). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988b). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of personality and social psychology, 54(6), 1063.
Werner-Seidler, A., Banks, R., Dunn, B. D., & Moulds, M. L. (2013). An investigation of the relationship between positive affect regulation and depression. Behav Res Ther, 51(1), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2012.11.001
White, A. M. (2020). Gender differences in the epidemiology of Alcohol Use and Related Harms in the United States. Alcohol Res, 40(2), 01. https://doi.org/10.35946/arcr.v40.2.01
Wills, T. A., Sandy, J. M., Shinar, O., & Yaeger, A. (1999). Contributions of positive and negative affect to adolescent substance use: Test of a bidimensional model in a longitudinal study. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 13(4), 327–338. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-164X.13.4.327
Wong, S. S. (2010). Balanced states of mind in psychopathology and psychological well-being. Int J Psychol, 45(4), 269–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207591003683090
Zhou, J., Heim, D., & O’Brien, K. (2015). Alcohol Consumption, Athlete Identity, and Happiness among Student Sportspeople as a function of Sport-Type. Alcohol Alcohol, 50(5), 617–623. https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agv030
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
This study was reviewed and approved by the University of Rhode Island Institutional Review Board prior to beginning data collection procedures.
Informed Consent
All participants provided informed consent via online questionnaire prior to providing responses to study questionnaires.
Conflicts of interest
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Schick, M.R., Trinh, C.D., Todi, A.A. et al. All Positive Constructs are Not Equal: Positive Affect, Happiness, and Life Satisfaction in Relation to Alcohol and Mental Health Outcomes. Int J Appl Posit Psychol 8, 467–484 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41042-023-00103-8
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41042-023-00103-8