Abstract
Over the past two decades, concrete has been frequently employed in the construction sector because of its features. The development of massive concrete buildings with more complicated geometries and dense reinforcing has been growing progressively. Moreover, there is an increased need for improving the current practices of concrete technology to create new forms of concrete with better qualities, which encouraged scholars to advance further investigations in this area of research. Consequently, an innovative type of concrete called Self-Compacting Concrete (SCC) has been improved. Simultaneously, one key challenge, confronted by the civil engineering sector, is how to go more environmentally friendly. Using reused waste materials, e.g., coal bottom ash (CBA), is one of the carefully utilized techniques in construction and building applications. The CBA’s pozzolanic characteristic with high silica and its useful pozzolanic capabilities have effectively turned CBA into a beneficial substitute in self-compacting concrete. Therefore, CBA has been successfully employed in producing SCC. Research into CBA function in SCC production not only contributes to increasing its use but also helps decrease the cost of landfills and provides a clean, sustainable, and environmental solution by conserving energy and reducing the depletion of natural resources. In this study, an overview of previous studies on CBA’s physical and chemical characteristics has been thoroughly presented. Moreover, the impact of CBA on the self-compacting concrete’s fresh and mechanical properties is discussed. Results indicated that using up to 10% CBA in SCC as sand replacement resulted in improved fresh and hardened properties.
Graphical abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Concrete is a significant component in construction [1]. Concrete has been developed from a material, which mainly incorporates cement, aggregate, water, in addition to a few admixtures to a specifically engineered material, which is made of various additional ingredients that enhance performance in a range of exposure circumstances [2, 3]. Concrete is a frequently utilized building material due to its beneficial characteristics [4, 5]. However, conventional concrete has some flaws in the commercial use of ordinary concrete. To tackle several issues of limited construction, such as intricate designs, the density of reinforcing steel in structural components, a shortage of skilled labor, the construction industry’s fast development, and the poor quality of construction, have altogether prompted the implementation of self-compacting concrete (SCC) to address these issues [6,7,8]. In 1988, Okamura was the first engineer to introduce the utilization of SCC, which was developed to tackle various problems related to building extremely overcrowded reinforced concrete components [9,10,11,12]. The aim of developing self-compacting concrete primarily involves creating an innovative concrete type. This concrete can flow through and fill the mold corners and reinforcing spaces without using vibrations or compacting throughout the casting process [13, 14].
Self-compacting concrete, shortened as (SCC) is defined as a concrete process that uses a specialized technology for flowing and filling the space in between reinforcing and the high-performance concrete [15]. Furthermore, this type of concrete, i.e., SCC amalgamates appropriately under self-weight, and it increases the resistance of hardened concrete without segregation, bleeding, or any other heterogeneity of components [16,17,18]. Such concrete qualifies are useful for practical uses [16,17,18]. Using plasticizers and powder admixtures is, thus, critical for the flowability, stability, and impermeability of self-compacting concrete as the hardened concrete longevity can be enhanced and compressive, tensile, and bending strengths are improved [19]. Sulphates and chlorides exhibit an increase in their concrete resistance. Also, it is eco-friendly and effectively minimizes carbon dioxide emissions and noise generated by dynamic compaction [20, 21]. The efficiency and long-term benefits of using mineral admixtures and additional cementitious materials like fly ash and Coal Bottom Ash (CBA) are relevant to SCC to achieve durability growth and maintain a wider economy towards a cost-cutting strategy [22, 23]. Besides, the incorporation of mineral admixtures allows for the preservation of workability and long-term properties [22, 24].
The growing exploitation of natural resources has resulted in a noticeable increase in industrial waste and environmental pollution [25, 26]. Therefore, it is essential to minimize the use of natural resources considerably so that future generations’ activities will not be endangered [27,28,29]. As a result, it has become increasingly critical to find innovative, alternative materials for sustainable development. The coal-fired power plant is, however, the main energy-generation source in almost every country worldwide [30]. Coal thermal power stations have been generating huge FA and CBA amounts for many years so far, which accounted for 20 to 80%, respectively of total emissions in the environment [31, 32]. Malaysia contributes to approximately 1.7 mil tons of CBA and 6.8 mil tons of fly ash production each year. CBA utilization in the building sector is a practical replacement option for reducing a variety of ecological problems [31, 33]. Previous studies delivered a list of various management techniques for using CBA. The incipient concerns of CBA are directly linked to the scarcity of disposal locations, the unrelenting growth of production, and the continuous loss of natural resources [30, 34]. Previous findings on using CBA as a suitable construction material provided several advantages to the industry, such as the fact that it is relatively inexpensive, light, and suitable for utilization as a suitable sand aggregate substitute in the SCC the application [35,36,37].
The use of CBA, in the current and future construction sector has been promoted because it has a similar particle size distribution, as well as additional pozzolanic characteristics as a replacement material in SCC. Therefore, it has been widely researched and debated as an alternative material [38, 39]. According to previous researchers [37, 40,41,42], SCC is made by mixing CBA with cement additives, including metakaolin and fly ash. However, with the inclusion of a water reduction agent, fine aggregate is substituted with 10 to 30% of CBA. Similarly [43, 44] found that SCC containing fly ash and CBA has been made to conform to the required criteria of fresh SCC and, as determined. According to [42] the optimum replacement level of fine aggregate with CBA can be up to 10% that would provide comparable performance to concrete made with 100% fine aggregate. Upon employing the mechanical characteristics of the SCC mix as a guide, it was shown that the optimum proportion of CBA can be replaced in the combination of up to 20% of fine aggregate. Moreover, studies highlighted CBA’s significant benefits, as the bulk of the SCC mechanical characteristics produced by adding 10% to 15% of CBA instead of fine aggregate, enhanced overall performance [41]. For utilizing CBA, the physical and chemical properties, together with fresh, as well as mechanical properties in the SCC mixture should be investigated. The review in this paper aims to outline the findings of previous studies about the utilization of CBA in self-compacting concrete. This paper also aims to provide a critical and comprehensive review of previous research on the CBA utilization as a suitable alternative material in SCC mixes. Furthermore, this paper aims to examine the CBA effect on concrete performance.
2 Research significance
In the construction industry, awareness about sustainable development has been growing considerably in recent years accompanied by the need to mitigate the industry’s environmental negative impact. A variety of industrial wastes have, therefore, been utilized in construction, especially in the production of concrete. Different industrial wastes can be exploited as partial or whole replacements for various concrete components. Using an industrial waste like CBA as a substitute material in making SCC is a good example. Several studies investigated the parameters, which affect the SCC’s mechanical behavior, as well as fresh concrete properties by using industrial wastes. In construction, resources are being recycled to produce sustainable concrete. CBA is a problem that affects people’s health and the environment as well. Recycling CBA and replacing it with main components of concrete could help conserve primary resources and reduce the emission of gases, which unfavorably influence human health. This review paper demonstrates that the utilization of CBA in producing SCC can help mitigate the depletion of raw materials. Limited studies that conducted with the aim of providing a comprehensive review analysis of previous researches regarding the use of CBA in SCC. Therefore, this review presents and discusses previous studies on using CBA as a substitute material in construction. The present review also investigates the CBA effects on the SCC fresh and mechanical properties. To this end, previous findings are examined and evaluated, and the main concrete properties are reviewed and compared to achieve optimal results. It is believed that providing a conclusions regarding the best practice of utilizing such material (CBA) in SCC is viable for guiding future researchers.
A Schematic diagram of the procedures used to conduct this review paper is presented in Fig. 1.
3 Coal bottom ash
3.1 CBA As waste material
CBA is a key source of industrial waste, which is produced by coal thermal power stations. Using CBA can potentially contribute to sustaining the global economy in construction because CBA plays a key role in mitigating the depletion of natural resources [45]. In the whole world, and particularly in the Malaysian context, eliminating CBA constitutes a crucial issue because of an acute shortage in dumping sites, in addition to the rising environmental impacts. CBA’s chemical properties incorporate high silica (SiO2), which is the reason why CBA enjoys good pozzolanic properties [32, 46]. Previous studies stated that the use of CBA in producing concrete contributes to enhancing concrete’s durability and its compressive strength. This is because CBA has an increasing pozzolanic reactivity and filler impact. Therefore, CBA constitutes a beneficial supplementary cementitious material in produced concrete [40, 47]. Furthermore, according to what has been mentioned in 2018 by the American Coal Ash Association, CBA has been broadly utilized in the fill and embankment, as well as other construction applications as demonstrated in the subsequent Table 1 [48].
3.2 Environmental sustainability and health Assessment of CBA
The CBA environmental sustainability can be periodically assured by conducting environmental impact assessments (EIA) throughout a product’s life cycle. However, the open disposal of CBA by coal thermal power plants, as well as many industrial sectors led to creating considerable ecological contamination, which resulted in major health hazards [49]. From an environmental perspective, utilizing CBA in the civil engineering application is a feasible solution for the significant disposal problems of such waste materials [50, 51]. PÖYKIÖ et al. (2016) emphasized that CBA disposal must be carefully handled either to avoid or mitigate environmental problems since CBA use is currently limited and at a low percentage [52]. Siddique et al. and Laura et al. [53, 54] conducted a CBA chemical analysis to determine the percentages of several existing elements like copper, zinc, barium, arsenic, mercury, and nickel. Several previous studies found that the existence of excessive amounts of heavy metals can inflict serious damage to living organisms’ tissues. Accumulating CBA in wide-open areas increases the likelihood of inhaling dangerous metals, such as copper, zinc, arsenic, barium, nickel, cadmium, mercury, aluminum, antimony, selenium, chromium, etc. The amount of metals, therefore, increases the risk of irreversible damage to the respiratory system, the genital system, and the gastrointestinal system, as well as lungs, kidneys, and raises the risk of birth abnormalities, and can lead to decreasing bone density in children [55,56,57]. Furthermore, Hashemi et al. and Aggarwal et al. [58, 59] examined concrete features of CBA radiation safety. In order of radioactive exposure, using CBA exerts a more beneficial environmental effect in the concrete industry compared to using it in heaps and ponds. Fly ash is utilized in the cement industry, and certain facilities have arranged with power plant operators to collect their fly ash regularly [60, 61]. Therefore, it is essential to research the CBA chemical composition to determine the risk and behavior associated with its influence on the environment.
3.3 Physical characteristics and chemical composition of CBA
The CBA physical characteristics and chemical composition in SCC differ not only based on the coal source but also the process of day-to-day manufacture and the production of coal in coal-fired power plants. This, in turn, affects the performance of CBA in SCC. The physical characteristics and chemical composition were investigated as reported by previous studies in the following sub-section.
3.3.1 Physical characteristics
Table 2 provides the CBA’s physical properties according to previous studies. The CBA physical characteristics in SCC depend on the size of particles and behavior [41, 42]. The color of raw CBA is grey; however, it becomes rather a dark grey after its grinding process, i.e., blackish [39]. Moreover, following the findings by several researchers, CBA is a substance of a dark grey color with most of its constituent particles being angular in shape and can be handled as a porous material of a gruff surface textile of low unit weight. Furthermore, according to the microstructure FESEM test, various CBA’s are obtained from different sources. As shown in Fig. 2 and Fig. 3, CBA is a material, which is characterized by a porous irregular shape of a dense structure [45] and [62], respectively.
3.3.2 Chemical composition
Scholars have examined the CBA chemical properties, as provided in Table 3 and the chemical composition of CBA was studied using microstructure analysis like energy dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDX) as mentioned in previous studies [59, 73]. Its chemical composition depends on the source of coal, as well as the technique of combustion. CBA has significant concentrations of alumina, silica, and iron; these are frequently found in such pozzolanic materials, whose total amounts make up between 70 and 93% of the overall chemical composition of coal. The loss on ignition of CBA has been reported by previously conducted studies, ranging between 0.8 and 13.0. CBA is categorized as either (Class C or Class F) pozzolanic material, following ASTM C618 [74] and following data gathered from a variety of studies. Nonetheless, the CBA coarse particle size can lead to a lower degree of pozzolanic reactivity. Therefore, when CBA is ground to smaller sizes, this enhances silica and CBA reactivity.
4 Self compacting concrete
4.1 Advantages use of self-compacting concrete
Recently, a considerable significance has been directed towards SCC due to the benefits it provides, such as minimizing building time, lowering labor costs, and improving structural compaction for reinforced complicated shapes [14, 84, 85]. The SCC containing CBA has fresh characteristics to guarantee that it functions very well in the mixture [63, 86]. The SCC fresh characteristics, including mobility, filling capability, passing capability, and segregation resistance, are critical criteria that influence the effectiveness of SCC with the CBA use [87, 88]. In general, SCC can be obtained by utilizing a new superplasticizer generation by reducing the ratio of water/binder (w/b in concrete). SCC has one downside, which involves the increased costs due to using chemical admixtures like superplasticizers [42]. Additionally, supplementary material ingredients, such as CBA are utilized to enhance the SCC viscosity and lower its cost [47]. Moreover, previous scholars examined self-compacting concrete, utilizing various additives, namely CBA. They found that CBA is an effective ingredient for SCC because of its lightweight and hard nature in reducing environmental contamination caused by this waste. Furthermore, the utilization of natural resources linked with main materials production causes severe environmental impacts [89,90,91].
4.2 Mixture design of self-compacting concrete
In 1995, H. Okamura introduced the first recommended SCC mixture design, dubbed as the Japanese or rational technique at that time. SCC is capable of flowing under its weight for filling gaps in the piece of work, flowing freely all through the reinforcing bars without external vibrator support. Also, it allows further concrete’s accurate leveling when placed without any segregation [92,93,94]. Therefore, when the SCC mixture design was developed, various assessments were conducted, such as V-Funnel, slump flow, and L-Box to evaluate fresh state properties and the SCC limitation according to EFNARC guidelines as illustrated in Table 4 [95]. This method is referred to as an empirical design [95]. Nan Suet al. [96] presented the conventionalized empirical design approach’s simple application for implementation and stated that this method may significantly decrease the amount of time, binders, and expense involved. This approach primarily aims to enhance workability via the utilization of a specified amount of paste material for keeping every aggregate material in place, thus increasing the freshness and strength of the concrete. This is often referred to as the technique of packing aggregates closely [10]. This means that SCC should use a minimum coarse aggregate amount volume, an increased paste volume, an increased powder volume, a lowering water-to-powder ratio, a higher superplasticizer dose, and an infrequently necessary viscosity modifying agent [96]. Recent studies have summarized the SCC mixture design [97] and, in 2015, it was found that the SCC mixture design is determined by five factors. These include 1) an empirical design method, 2) a close aggregate packing technique, 3) paste rheology, 4) a method of compressive strength, and 5) a statistical factorial approach [95]. Previous research has shown that the SCC compressive strength ranged between 20 and 100 MPa at 28 curing days, with 40 MPa as a mean compressive strength [98,99,100]. SCC has a high resilience degree. Also, no extraordinary mix design is required if it achieves real applicability, economy, practicability, and high quality in both its fresh and hardened states. General exhibits are determined as a part by the basic materials used in the mix design [101].
5 Fresh properties of self-compacting concrete incorporating CBA
As displayed in Table 5, previous studies reported the results of fresh properties tests of CBA in the SCC, showing the range of fresh properties and the impact of adding varying ratios of CBA substitution in SCC.
5.1 Slump flow test
The slump flow test involves an average diameter of a concrete volume after releasing the conventional slump cone. It can be assessed on a couple of perpendicular sides [95]. As shown in Fig. 4, previous research identified the CBA quantity impact on the SCC passing ability. Siddique et al. [38] studied the SCC fresh properties with the use of CBA at 10%, 20%, 30%, and this superplasticizer amount (1.88–2.0%). The results showed that slump flow increased for all the replacement percentages, excluding the one containing 20% CBA and 1.90% of superplasticizer (591mm) [38], as per the guidelines outlined by the standard EFNARC, ranging between (650–800 mm) of SCC [95]. Increases in the superplasticizer amount resulted in a higher flow, while increases in the CBA amount resulted in a reduction of slump flow [38]. In their study, Ibrahim et al. [42] studied the slump flow for SCC and the results revealed a 740–540 mm range and reported a relative difference between various mixes because the flow characteristics of self SCC mixtures contain CBA, which have a higher viscosity than control specimens [42]. Another study by Keerio et al. [102] produced various SCC mixes using CBA (10–40%) as a fine aggregate substitute and found that CBA content increased and the slump flow decreased due to the CBA porosity, which, compared with fine aggregate, absorbed more water. The findings of another study, conducted by Hamzah et al. [103] revealed that the time of slump flow increased with an increase in the CBA replacement content in SCC. Mixtures containing 0–30% CBA content showed slump flow time, ranging between 2 and 5 s, i.e., in line with the range outlined by EFNARC [95]. The reason is that the CBA’s irregular shape lowered inter-particle friction with the addition of CBA, which decreased the SCC mixes’ viscosity.
5.2 L-Box test
The percentage of L-box elevation can be used in tandem with the H2/H1 ratio to define the self-compacting concrete’s passing abilities [95]. Several previous studies examined the effect of CBA quantity on the SCC L-box test, as shown in Fig. 5. Kasemchaisiri et al. [104] reported that the L-box passage ratio was between 0.83 and 0.05 and that the value decreased in all mixtures as the CBA percentage in SCC increased. A reduction in the L-box ratio due to the presence of aggregate blockage in a mixture of self-compacting concrete, containing CBA, was detected and a greater level of inter-particle friction was produced by the CBA particles [104]. Similarly, another study by Jamaluddin et al. [37] reported a decrease in the L-box test results with increasing the replacement proportion of CBA incorporated into the SCC mixture. Nevertheless, when the w/b proportion increases, the value of the L-box decreases. The results varied between 0.9 and 0.66, indicating that the concrete mixture without CBA had a higher passing ability [37]. This is due to the aggregate clogging up in front of apertures, which made it difficult for particles to flow freely without occlusion [37].
Hamzah et al. [103] observed that the L-box flow results improved with increasing the CBA proportion in concrete. The range is between 0.7 and 0.95 [103]. According to Singh et al. [35], an increase was observed in the L-box ratio, thereby increasing the replacement proportion of CBA in the SCC mixture. The value reached up to 1.0 in a 30% of CBA, with a greater value, which showed an improved passing ability [35]. EFNARC standard guideline [95] categorized L-box passing ratios as (passing ability1(PA1) with two rebars) or (passing ability 2 (PA2) with three rebars). The findings provided by each researcher indicated that the L-box passing ratio is within the acceptable range [95].
5.3 V-funnel test
This conducted test verifies the SCC mixtures’ viscosity and flowability. A mixture’s better flowability denotes a very short flow time and, as per EFNARC, the V-funnel test’s duration ranges between 6 and 12 s [95]. It was established in another previous study that the V-funnel flow time for several types of SCC ranged between 2.5 and 4.6 s according to Keerio et al. [102]. They found that the V-funnel flow time of SCC increases as the replacement ratio of CBA increases. They also confirmed that a high quantity of superplasticizer is required for producing SCC when CBA is combined with metakaolin, as compared to SCC made without any replacement materials [102]. Likewise, Aswathy et al. [41] observed an increment in the V-funnel value as the percentage content of CBA increased. The finding of V-funnel value between 8 and 12 s, signifying an enhanced passing ability [41]. The EFNARC standard guideline [95] categorized V-funnel flow time into two categories: VF1 (8 s) and VS2 (9–25 s) [95]. According to the findings obtained by each researcher, the V-funnel flow time of certain results falls into the VF1 category, while others fall into the VF2 category [95].
5.4 J-ring test
The J-ring test, in parallel to the L-box test, can be applied in conjunction with the test of slump flow to ascertain that concrete can pass-through bars, as per EFNARC [95]. According to ASTM C1621 [105], J-ring can be defined as a method of testing concrete’s capacity of passing through under its weight, thereby filling spaces, and getting a blocking evaluation [105]. The J-ring flow results were reported by Siddique et al. [38] which ranged between 2.3 and 11.6 mm for various self-compacting concrete. The results of the J-ring flow of SCC containing CBA rose as the CBA amount increased for all the mixtures [38]. Also, based on another study by Keerio et al. [102] the values of the J-ring ranged between 2.5 and 8.7 mm. As observed, the values increased with an increase in the CBA replacement ratios in the SCC mixture [102].
6 Discussion of finding from fresh properties
Existing research indicates that the ideal content of CBA is between 10 and 20% to meet the criteria of "filling and passing ability" and "segregation resistance". The dependence of the result depends on the water-binder ratio and the amount of superplasticizer used. An increase in the CBA content has been observed to have a negative effect on processability and segregation. CBA has the potential to be used at 10% to 20% in SCC, meeting standards set by the European Federation of National Associations Representative for Concrete (EFNARC). Based on the above-mentioned previous studies, it was observed that the key properties of CBA in SCC, namely slump and L-box ratio, show a decrease, while J-ring and V-funnel values increase with increasing substitution ratio of CBA in the concrete mix. The reduction in the freshness properties of the mixture can be attributed to the absorption of moisture content by the CBA particles, resulting in increased friction between the aggregate particles generated by the CBA particles. The conclusions from all of the previous studies support the criteria and limitations established in the SCC standards and recommendations, including the requirements of EFNARC, 2002, and ACI 237R-07.
7 Mechanical properties of self-compacting concrete incorporating CBA
The next sub-sections discuss the mechanical properties of self-compacting concrete (SCC) incorporating CBA. The discussion includes compressive strength, flexural tensile strength, and splitting tensile strength. Table 6 presents a summary of the CBA effect on the SCC mechanical properties based on previous studies.
7.1 Compressive strength
Compressive strength along with fresh characteristics are regarded as the significant valuable features of self-compacting concrete (SCC), providing a complete picture of the condition of concrete as they are closely associated with the cement paste structure [6]. Furthermore, the concrete’s compressive strength at room temperature is influenced by ambient curing, water-to-cement ratio, aggregate particles size and category, aggregate-paste interface transition zone, categories of admixture, and stress applied [106]. Previous researchers [47, 104, 107] confirmed the CBA suitable percentages of use in the SCC mix, i.e., 10–20%; such a percentage improved compressive strength properties. Siddique et al. [44] examined how the compressive strength of the SCC containing CBA and coal fly ash can be affected by the utilized water-to-powder ratio. The results showed a comparable behavior with regular SCC when strength was increased by lowering the w/p ratio. Self-compacting concrete showed enhanced strength properties as the w/p ratio decreased, i.e., 0.439–0.414 for the 0% CBA, a decrease from 0.50 to 0.47 for the 10% CBA, with a decrease from 0.58 to 0.51 for the 20% CBA, and from 0.620 to 0.546 for the 30% CBA. Self-compacting concrete can, therefore, be produced at 40–50 MPa compressive strength using various percentages of CBA merged with coal fly ash between 15 and 30%.
As reported by Kasemchaisiri [104] the SCC compressive strength with CBA is 10–30%, compared with the control samples without CBA. It was found that 10% of CBA obtained higher values of compressive strength. Other percentages were decreased, which can be attributed to delayed pozzolanic reaction, which dominated over the raised porosity. Similar observations were also made by [107], whereby increasing replacement amounts of CBA ranging from 10 to 30% decreased the compressive strength. The decrease was between 54 and 42 MPa at 180 curing days, as demonstrated in Fig. 6. Another study by Zainal Abidin et al. [40] recorded an increased compressive strength up to 15% CBA in the SCC mix. These increased properties of strength revealed that there was a pozzolanic reactivity in SCC containing CBA particles. Compressive strength obtained these increases: 44.30MPa, 50.33MPa, 54.05MPa, 37.90MPa, 36.65MPa for CBA0%, CBA10%, CBA15%, and CBA20%, CBA25%, respectively.
A reduction in concrete strength was obtained by Siddique et al. [38] throughout the curing initial stages due to CBA’s delayed pozzolanic reactivity. However, the concrete strength improved significantly during the long period of curing. The compressive strength in SCC decreased with increasing the water-to-binder ratio and the proportion of CBA replacement. According to the conducted review of previous studies, the behavior of SCC containing CBA can be affected by the percentages of CBA, the superplasticizer inclusion, and the utilized w/c ratio. Therefore, adding a finer size of CBA using appropriate proportions encourages the formation of pozzolanic reactions.
7.2 Flexural strength
According to Jamaluddin et al. [37], a reduced flexural strength for SCC incorporating CBA was observed at different ages, as exhibited in Fig. 7. Fine aggregate was substituted with CBA at varying ratios of replacement up to 30%. Furthermore, the optimal percentage of 10% CBA is higher when compared with control samples. The authors reported an increased flexural strength with a higher value of 8.2 MPa with 0.35 w/c during the lengthy time of curing ages. Conversely, the flexural strength was decreased for all water-cement ratios when 15%, 20%, 25%, and 30% alternative of CBA is utilized in SCC [37]. Another study by Zainal Abidin et al. [90] reported that CBA’s flexural strength in self-compacting concrete with 10% and 15% alternative of CBA is greater compared to SCC without the addition of CBA at 7–28 ages of curing. Furthermore, flexural strength for other replacement percentages was decreased.
Another study by Siddique et al. [44] reported that the flexural strength of SCC was decreased as CBA increased. They showed that when the CBA replacement ratio increases, flexural strength drops because of a weaker contact between the cement paste and ashes. As per Keerio et al. [102], the SCC mixes’ flexural strength with CBA from (10% to 30%) decreased as the replacement percentages increased at various ages starting from 3 to 180 days of curing in contrast to regular concrete without CBA. The reduction occurred due to low inter-particle abrasion between the aggregate particles, as the CBA particles have spheres formed.
7.3 Splitting tensile strength
Various mechanical characteristics of concrete can be assessed using one of the fundamental and significant characteristics [42]. The splitting tensile strength of the concrete structures significantly affects the cracking development and size [42]. Concrete is weak under tension and, therefore, it is essential to conduct a preliminary assessment of the concrete’s splitting tensile strength [42]. Another study by Siddique et al. [38] examined the splitting tensile strength of self-compacting concrete containing 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30% of CBA as a partial replacement for fine aggregate in concrete. There was a decrease in the concrete’s splitting tensile strength with increased amounts of CBA at the entire ages of curing due to insufficient interlocking of the fine aggregate particles replacing the fine aggregate with CBA. Similar trend observations were also made by Sandhya et al. [108], who reported a decrease in the SCC splitting tensile strength with increased CBA replacement percentages, while strength increased with curing ages.
Another study by Zainal Abidin et al. [90] recorded splitting tensile strengths of 3.6, 3.75, 3.9, 3.5, 3.4, and 3.1 MPa at 28 days, in the examined SCC mixture containing CBA 0,10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, respectively. An increase was reported in the splitting tensile strength of the samples as the CBA replacement ratio reached 15%, as shown in Fig. 8. Similarly, another study by Aswathy et al. [41] reported an increase in the splitting tensile strength as the replacement ratio of CBA reached 10% using a fixed 0.45 w/c ratio. This increased CBA replacement resulted in more porous concrete, having larger pores, which were scattered across the CBA aggregate surface, thereby decreasing its tensile strength [41].
8 Discussion of finding from mechanical properties
The investigation of the influence of the CBA volume in SCC on its strength characteristics revealed that the incorporation of CBA as a replacement material at levels of up to 10% yielded a significant improvement relative to traditional concrete. Previous research has shown that the incorporation of a modest amount of CBA in SCC has resulted in notable improvements in mechanical parameters, including compressive strength, split tensile strength, and flexural strength. These enhancements have been seen that reach up to 10% in the majority of the results. The increase in strength may be ascribed to the pore refinement effect resulting from the pozzolanic activity of CBA. The use of CBA as a replacement material leads to an enhanced level of porosity. However, it is worth noting that the presence of silica in CBA particles plays a crucial role in facilitating the synthesis of calcium-silicate-hydrate (C-S–H), a gel-like substance that significantly contributes to the development of strength in materials. The observed increase in strength may be attributed to the higher concentration of calcium silicate hydrate (C-S–H) in the SCC samples mixed with CBA. This increase in C-S–H is a consequence of the reaction between the calcium hydroxide produced during cement hydration and the reactive silica present in the CBA.
9 Conclusion
The aim of this research was to provide a comprehensive review regarding the use of CBA in SCC. Based on the conducted review the following conclusions were drawn:
-
CBA can be used to replace up to 20% of the fine aggregate in SCC without negatively affecting its fresh properties and up10% without reducing its mechanical properties considerably.
-
Extending the age of curing for samples with CBA can significantly enhance the properties of SCC due to the delayed pozzolanic reaction of CBA.
-
The CBA’s physical and chemical characteristics are suitable to be effectively utilized in producing self-compacting concrete.
-
The CBA inclusion affects fresh properties like (L-box, V-funnel, slump flow, J-ring) in the SCC mixture. The L-box height ratio ranged from (0.8 to 1.0), which is in the range of the EFNARC standard for all SCC mixtures as mentioned by several researchers. For other fresh properties like (V-funnel, slump flow, J-ring) in self-compacting concrete, they were decreased as the substitution ratio of CBA increased.
10 Future recommendations
The utilization of SCC in the building industry has been growing steadily and according to previous studies, SCC has several appealing features. It contributes to enhancing fresh and hardened characteristics, which makes it perfect for effective use in the construction sector. By adding CBA and chemical admixtures, as well as a variety of aggregate percentages, improved fresh and hardened characteristics were obtained. The evaluation has been conducted in line with this review and sufficient materials were provided. However, many gaps remain in this field of research, which should be explored further. To concentrate on the construction industry’s use of SCC, it is, therefore, recommended to examine the effect of CBA inclusion on the durability characteristics, such as bond strength, impact resistance, and abrasion resistance. Apart from these mechanical characteristics, time-dependent mechanical characteristics of SCC, such as creep and shrinkage are suggested topics for further studies to narrow the scope of research. The inclusion of CBA as a pozzolanic material and chemical admixtures (superplasticizers) increases the capacity of SCC to pass through and flow. Additionally, limited research has been conducted on the rheological and thixotropic behavior of SCC. Therefore, to obtain a better understanding of workability, such behaviors should be investigated by incorporating CBA into SCC.
Data availability
Data will be made available on request.
Abbreviations
- SCC:
-
Self-compacting concrete
- CBA:
-
Coal bottom ash
- FA:
-
Fly Ash
- EIA:
-
Environmental impact assessments
- EDX:
-
Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy
- W/B:
-
Water to binder ratio
References
AlBiajawi MI, Embong R, Muthusamy K (2021) An overview of the utilization and method for improving pozzolanic performance of agricultural and industrial wastes in concrete. Mater Today Proceed 48:778–783
Li P, Li W, Sun Z et al (2021) Development of sustainable concrete incorporating seawater: A critical review on hydration, microstructure and mechanical strength. Cem Concr Compos 121:104100
Kanyal KS, Agrawal Y, Gupta T (2021) Properties of sustainable concrete containing red mud: a review. J Sci Res Rep. https://doi.org/10.9734/jsrr/2021/v27i330366
Miraldo S, Lopes S, Pacheco-Torgal F, Lopes A (2021) Advantages and shortcomings of the utilization of recycled wastes as aggregates in structural concretes. Constr Build Mater 298:123729
Al-Rifaie W, Alawaneh A, Al-Bajawi M, Ahmed W (2018) Effect of nano silica on compressive strength of concrete in ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. Am Soc Mech Eng 52170:044
Siddique R (2019) Self-compacting concrete: materials, properties and applications. Woodhead Publishing
Ma Z, Fang G, Liang Z, Jin D (2021) Experimental study on Mechanical Properties of green and environmental friendly self-compacting recycled concrete. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 787:12029
Li J, Zhang J, Ni S et al (2021) Mechanical performance and environmental impacts of self-compacting concrete with recycled demolished concrete blocks. J Clean Prod 293:126129
Yankun Z, Guangzhi CAI, Dongya Q (2021) Review on self compacting concrete with manufactured sand. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 634:12121
Shi C, Wu Z, Lv K, Wu L (2015) A review on mixture design methods for self-compacting concrete. Constr Build Mater 84:387–398
Ashish DK, Verma SK (2019) An overview on mixture design of self-compacting concrete. Struct Concr 20:371–395
Alexandra C, Bogdan H, Camelia N, Zoltan K (2018) Mix design of self-compacting concrete with limestone filler versus fly ash addition. Proced Manuf 22:301–308
Chandru P, Natarajan C, Karthikeyan J (2018) Influence of sustainable materials in strength and durability of self-compacting concrete: a review. J Build Pathol Rehabil 3:1–16
Adesina A, Awoyera P (2019) Overview of trends in the application of waste materials in self-compacting concrete production. SN Appl Sci 1:1–18
Revilla-Cuesta V, Skaf M, Faleschini F et al (2020) Self-compacting concrete manufactured with recycled concrete aggregate: an overview. J Clean Prod 262:121362
Grdic ZJ, Toplicic-Curcic GA, Despotovic IM, Ristic NS (2010) Properties of self-compacting concrete prepared with coarse recycled concrete aggregate. Constr Build Mater 24:1129–1133
Corinaldesi V, Moriconi G (2011) The role of industrial by-products in self-compacting concrete. Constr Build Mater 25:3181–3186
Santos S, Da Silva PR, De Brito J (2019) Self-compacting concrete with recycled aggregates–a literature review. J Build Eng 22:349–371
Dey S, Kumar VVP, Goud KR, Basha SKJ (2021) State of art review on self compacting concrete using mineral admixtures. J Build Pathol Rehabil 6:1–23
Alsheltat M, Ramadhan A (2018) A review on studies of the mechanical properties of self compacting concrete. Sustain Structures Mater Int J 1:21–29
Mansour AM, Al Biajawi MI (2022) The effect of the addition of metakaolin on the fresh and hardened properties of blended cement products: a review. Mater Today Proceed. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.06.521
Esquinas AR, Álvarez JI, Jiménez JR, Fernández JM (2018) Durability of self-compacting concrete made from non-conforming fly ash from coal-fired power plants. Constr Build Mater 189:993–1006
Al Biajawi MI, Embong R, Muthusamy K, Mohamad N (2023) Effect of fly ash and coal bottom ash as alternative materials in the production of self compacting concrete: A review. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. AIP Publishing
AlBiajawi MI, Embong R, Muthusamy K (2021) Influence of mineral admixtures on the properties of self-compacting concrete: an overview. Construction 1:62–75
Almeshal I, Al-Tayeb MM, Qaidi SMA et al (2022) Mechanical properties of eco-friendly cements-based glass powder in aggressive medium. Mater Today Proceed 58:1582–1587
Al-Tayeb MM, Aisheh YIA, Qaidi SMA, Tayeh BA (2022) Experimental and simulation study on the impact resistance of concrete to replace high amounts of fine aggregate with plastic waste. Case Studies Constr Mater 17:e01324
Guo Z, Jiang T, Zhang J et al (2020) Mechanical and durability properties of sustainable self-compacting concrete with recycled concrete aggregate and fly ash, slag and silica fume. Constr Build Mater 231:117115
Qaidi S, Najm HM, Abed SM et al (2022) Concrete containing waste glass as an environmentally friendly aggregate: a review on fresh and mechanical characteristics. Materials 15:6222
Qaidi SMA, Dinkha YZ, Haido JH et al (2021) Engineering properties of sustainable green concrete incorporating eco-friendly aggregate of crumb rubber: a review. J Clean Prod 324:129251
Embong R, Kusbiantoro A, Muthusamy K, Ismail N (2021) Recycling of coal bottom ash (CBA) as cement and aggregate replacement material: a review. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 682:012035. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/682/1/012035
Rafieizonooz M, Mirza J, Salim MR et al (2016) Investigation of coal bottom ash and fly ash in concrete as replacement for sand and cement. Constr Build Mater 116:15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.080
Embong R, Kusbiantoro A, Abd Wahab A, Muthusamy K (2021) Soluble Pozzolanic materials from coal bottom ash as cement replacement material. Key Eng Mater Trans Tech Publ 879:68–80
Abubakar AU, Baharudin KS (2012) Properties of concrete using tanjung bin power plant coal bottom ash and fly ash. Int J Sustain Constr Eng Technol 3:56–69
Dou X, Ren F, Nguyen MQ et al (2017) Review of MSWI bottom ash utilization from perspectives of collective characterization, treatment and existing application. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 79:24–38
Singh N, Mithulraj M, Arya S (2019) Utilization of coal bottom ash in recycled concrete aggregates based self compacting concrete blended with metakaolin. Resour Conserv Recycl 144:240–251
Hamzah Afbin (2017) Durability of self-compacting concrete with coal bottom ash as sand replacement material under aggressive environment. Mater Sci Eng
Jamaluddin N, Hamzah AF, Wan Ibrahim MH et al (2016) Fresh properties and flexural strength of self-compacting concrete integrating coal bottom ash. MATEC Web Conf EDP Sci 47:01010
Siddique R, Kunal, (2015) Design and development of self-compacting concrete made with coal bottom ash. J Sustain Cement-Based Mater 4:225–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650373.2015.1004138
Siddique R (2013) Compressive strength, water absorption, sorptivity, abrasion resistance and permeability of self-compacting concrete containing coal bottom ash. Constr Build Mater 47:1444–1450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.06.081
Zainal Abidin NE, Wan Ibrahim MH, Jamaluddin N et al (2014) The effect of bottom ash on fresh characteristic, compressive strength and water absorption of self-compacting concrete. Appl Mech Mater Trans Tech Publ 660:145–151
Aswathy PU, Paul MM (2015) Behaviour of self-compacting concrete by partial replacement of fine aggregate with coal bottom ash. Behaviour 2(10)
Ibrahim MHW, Hamzah AF, Jamaluddin N et al (2015) Split tensile strength on self-compacting concrete containing coal bottom ash. Proced Soc Behav Sci 195:2280–2289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.317
Siddique R, Aggarwal P, Aggarwal Y (2012) Mechanical and durability properties of self-compacting concrete containing fly ash and bottom ash. J Sustain Cement-Based Mater 1:67–82
Siddique R, Aggarwal P, Aggarwal Y (2012) Influence of water/powder ratio on strength properties of self-compacting concrete containing coal fly ash and bottom ash. Constr Build Mater 29:73–81
Ramzi NIR, Shahidan S, Maarof MZ, Ali N (2016) Physical and chemical properties of coal bottom ash (CBA) from Tanjung Bin Power Plant. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 160:12056
Kusbiantoro A, Hanani A, Embong R (2019) Pozzolanic reactivity of coal bottom ash after chemically pre-treated with sulfuric acid. Mater Sci Forum 947:212–216
Wani MH, Hamzah AF, Jamaluddin N et al (2020) Influence of bottom ash as a sand replacement material on durability of self-compacting concrete exposed to seawater. J Eng Sci Technol 15:555–571
American Coal Ash Association (2018) Coal Ash Recycling Reaches Record 64 Percent Amid Shifting Production and Use Patterns
Ibeto CN, Obiefuna CJ, Ugwu KE (2020) Environmental effects of concretes produced from partial replacement of cement and sand with coal ash. Int J Environ Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-020-02682-4
Silva RV, de Brito J, Lynn CJ, Dhir RK (2019) Environmental impacts of the use of bottom ashes from municipal solid waste incineration: a review. Resour Conserv Recycl 140:23–35
Kim HK (2015) Utilization of sieved and ground coal bottom ash powders as a coarse binder in high-strength mortar to improve workability. Constr Build Mater 91:57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.05.017
Pöykiö R, Mäkelä M, Watkins G et al (2016) Heavy metals leaching in bottom ash and fly ash fractions from industrial-scale BFB-boiler for environmental risks assessment. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 26:256–264
Siddique R (2014) Utilization of industrial by-products in concrete. Proced Eng 95:335–347
Ruhl L, Vengosh A, Dwyer GS et al (2009) Survey of the potential environmental and health impacts in the immediate aftermath of the coal ash spill in Kingston, Tennessee. Environ Sci Technol 43:6326–6333
Prabhakar AK, Mohan BC, Tay TS et al (2021) Incinerated sewage sludge bottom ash-chemical processing, leaching patterns and toxicity testing. J Hazard Mater 402:123350
Sutcu M, Erdogmus E, Gencel O et al (2019) Recycling of bottom ash and fly ash wastes in eco-friendly clay brick production. J Clean Prod 233:753–764
Khan RA, Ganesh A (2016) The effect of coal bottom ash (CBA) on mechanical and durability characteristics of concrete. J Build Mater Struct 3:31–42. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.242470
Hashemi SSG, Bin MH, Ghuan TC et al (2019) Safe disposal of coal bottom ash by solidification and stabilization techniques. Constr Build Mater 197:705–715
Aggarwal Y, Siddique R (2014) Microstructure and properties of concrete using bottom ash and waste foundry sand as partial replacement of fine aggregates. Constr Build Mater 54:210–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.051
Abdullah MH, Rashid ASA, Anuar UHM et al (2019) Bottom ash utilization: a review on engineering applications and environmental aspects. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 527:12006
Youcai Z (2016) Pollution control and resource recovery: municipal solid wastes incineration: bottom ash and fly ash. Butterworth-Heinemann
Abdulmatin A, Tangchirapat W, Jaturapitakkul C (2018) An investigation of bottom ash as a pozzolanic material. Constr Build Mater 186:155–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.101
Kumar P, Singh N (2020) Influence of recycled concrete aggregates and Coal Bottom Ash on various properties of high volume fly ash-self compacting concrete. J Build Eng 32:101491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101491
Kim Y-H, Kim H-Y, Yang K-H, Ha J-S (2021) Effect of concrete unit weight on the mechanical properties of bottom ash aggregate concrete. Constr Build Mater 273:121998
Yang K-H, Kim H-Y, Lee H-J (2021) Shrinkage behavior of concrete containing bottom ash granules as partial replacement of natural sands. Constr Build Mater 300:124188
Khatib J, Jahami A, El Kordi A et al (2021) Effect of municipal solid waste incineration bottom ash (MSWI-BA) on the structural performance of reinforced concrete (RC) beams. J Eng Des Technol 21(3):862–882
Rodríguez-Álvaro R, González-Fonteboa B, Seara-Paz S, Rey-Bouzón EJ (2021) Masonry mortars, precast concrete and masonry units using coal bottom ash as a partial replacement for conventional aggregates. Constr Build Mater 283:122737
Nanda B, Rout S (2021) Properties of concrete containing fly ash and bottom ash mixture as fine aggregate. Int J Sustain Eng. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2021.1920641
Yang I-H, Park J, Le Dinh N, Jung S (2020) Strength properties of high-strength concrete containing coal bottom ash as a replacement of aggregates. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2020:1–12
Hannan NIRR, Shahidan S, Ali N et al (2020) Acoustic and non-acoustic performance of coal bottom ash concrete as sound absorber for wall concrete. Case Stud Constr Mater 13:e00399
Sanjuán MÁ, Quintana B, Argiz C (2019) Coal bottom ash natural radioactivity in building materials. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 319:91–99
Kirthika SK, Surya M, Singh SK (2019) Effect of clay in alternative fine aggregates on performance of concrete. Constr Build Mater 228:116811
Hashemi SSG, Bin MH, Djobo JNY et al (2018) Microstructural characterization and mechanical properties of bottom ash mortar. J Clean Prod 170:797–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.191
American Society for Testing and Materials (2019) ASTM C618–19, Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use in Concrete. Annual Book of ASTM Standards 5. https://doi.org/10.1520/C0618-19
Argiz C, Moragues A, Menéndez E (2018) Use of ground coal bottom ash as cement constituent in concretes exposed to chloride environments. J Clean Prod 170:25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.117
Ge X, Zhou M, Wang H et al (2018) Preparation and characterization of ceramic foams from chromium slag and coal bottom ash. Ceram Int 44:11888–11891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.03.122
Singh M, Siddique R (2015) Properties of concrete containing high volumes of coal bottom ash as fine aggregate. J Clean Prod 91:269–278
Wongkeo W, Chaipanich A (2010) Compressive strength, microstructure and thermal analysis of autoclaved and air cured structural lightweight concrete made with coal bottom ash and silica fume. Mater Sci Eng, A 527:3676–3684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2010.01.089
Pyo S, Kim HK (2017) Fresh and hardened properties of ultra-high performance concrete incorporating coal bottom ash and slag powder. Constr Build Mater 131:459–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.10.109
Baite E, Messan A, Hannawi K et al (2016) Physical and transfer properties of mortar containing coal bottom ash aggregates from Tefereyre (Niger). Constr Build Mater 125:919–926
Ghafoori N, Cai Y (1998) Laboratory-made roller compacted concretes containing dry bottom ash: Part II - Long-term durability. ACI Mater J 95:244–251. https://doi.org/10.14359/368
Oruji S, Brake NA, Nalluri L, Guduru RK (2017) Strength activity and microstructure of blended ultra-fine coal bottom ash-cement mortar. Constr Build Mater 153:317–326
Shahbaz M, Yusup S, Inayat A et al (2017) Cleaner production of hydrogen and syngas from catalytic steam palm kernel shell gasification using CaO sorbent and coal bottom ash as a catalyst. Energy Fuels 31:13824–13833
Elemam WE, Abdelraheem AH, Mahdy MG, Tahwia AM (2020) Optimizing fresh properties and compressive strength of self-consolidating concrete. Constr Build Mater 249:118781
Hamzah AF, Wan Ibrahim MH, Jamaluddin N et al (2015) Cementitious materials usage in self-compacting concrete: a review. Adv Mater Res Trans Tech Publ 1113:153–160
Pathak N, Siddique R (2012) Properties of self-compacting-concrete containing fly ash subjected to elevated temperatures. Constr Build Mater 30:274–280
Ibrahim MHBW, Shahidan S, Algaifi HA, et al (2021) CBA Self-compacting Concrete Exposed to Water Curing. In: Properties of Self-Compacting Concrete with Coal Bottom Ash Under Aggressive Environments. Springer, pp 9–31
Singh N, Mithulraj M, Arya S (2018) Influence of coal bottom ash as fine aggregates replacement on various properties of concretes: a review. Resour Conserv Recycl 138:257–271
Singh N, Kumar P, Goyal P (2019) Reviewing the behaviour of high volume fly ash based self compacting concrete. Journal of Building Engineering 26:100882
Zainal Abidin NE, Wan Ibrahim MH, Jamaluddin N et al (2015) The strength behavior of self-compacting concrete incorporating bottom ash as partial replacement to fine aggregate. Appl Mech Mater 773–774:916–922. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.773-774.916
Sua-Iam G, Makul N (2015) Utilization of coal-and biomass-fired ash in the production of self-consolidating concrete: a literature review. J Clean Prod 100:59–76
Li J, Yin J, Zhou S, Li Y (2005) Mix proportion calculation method of self-compacting high performance concrete. In: SCC’2005-China: 1st International Symposium on Design, Performance and Use of Self-Consolidating Concrete. RILEM Publications SARL, pp 199–205
Okamura H (1997) Self-compacting high-performance concrete. Concr Int 19:50–54
Nagamoto N, Ozawa K (1999) Mixture properties of self-compacting, high-performance concrete. Spec Publ 172:623–636
Efnarc F (2005) Specification and guidelines for self-compacting concrete European federation of specialist construction chemicals and concrete system. BIBM 22:563
Su N, Hsu K-C, Chai H-W (2001) A simple mix design method for self-compacting concrete. Cem Concr Res 31:1799–1807
Danish P, Ganesh GM (2020) Self-compacting Concrete—Optimization of Mix Design Procedure by the Modifications of Rational Method. In: International Conference on Innovative Technologies for Clean and Sustainable Development. Springer, pp 369–396
Aggarwal P, Siddique R, Aggarwal Y, Gupta SM (2008) Self-compacting concrete-procedure for mix design. Leonardo Electron J Pract Technol 7:15–24
Jawahar JG, Sashidhar C, Reddy IVR, Peter JA (2012) A simple tool for self compacting concrete mix design. Int J Adv Eng Technol 3:550
Sedran T de, De Larrard F, Hourst F, Contamines C (2004) Mix design of self-compacting concrete (SCC). In: Production methods and workability of concrete. CRC Press, pp 451–462
Domone PL (2007) A review of the hardened mechanical properties of self-compacting concrete. Cement Concr Compos 29:1–12
Keerio MA, Saand A, Kumar A, et al (2021) Effect of Local Metakaolin Developed from Natural Material Soorh and Coal Bottom Ash on Fresh, Hardened Properties and Embodied Carbon of Self-Compacting Concrete
Hamzah AF, Ibrahim MHW, Jamaluddin N et al (2015) Fresh characteristic and mechanical compressive strength development of self-compacting concrete integrating coal bottom ash as partial fine aggregates replacement. Int J Mech Mechatron Eng 15:61–67
Kasemchaisiri R, Tangtermsirikul S (2008) Properties of self-compacting concrete in corporating bottom ash as a partial replacement of fine aggregate. Sci Asia 34:87–95
ASTM C (2014) Standard test method for passing ability of self-consolidating concrete by J-ring
Neville AM (2011) Properties of concrete, 5th edn. Green technology an A-to-Z guide SAGE Publication, California
Hamzah AF, Ibrahim MHW, Manan EA (2020) Carbonation and strength of self-compacting concrete with coal bottom ash exposed to seawater by wetting-drying cycle. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 476:12032
Sandhya B, Reshma EK (2013) A study on mechanical properties of cement concrete by partial replacement of fine aggregates with bottom ash. Int J Stud Res Technol Manage 1:416–430
Hamzah AF, Ibrahim MHW, Jamaluddin N et al (2016) Nomograph of self-compacting concrete mix design incorporating coal bottom ash as partial replacement of fine aggregates. J Eng Appl Sci 11:1671–1675
Singh N, Arya S, Raj MM (2019) Assessing the performance of self-compacting concrete made with recycled concrete aggregates and coal bottom ash using ultrasonic pulse velocity. In: Reddy KR, Bansal A (eds) Arvind Kumar Agnihotri. Recycled Waste Materials. Springer, Singapore, pp 169–178
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Ministry of Higher Education for providing financial support under fundamental research grant Scheme (FRGS) No. (FRGS/1/2022/TK01/UMP/02/5 (university reference RDU(220112) and Universiti Malaysia Pahang AL-Sultan Abdullah (UMPSA) for laboratories facilities as well as additional support under internal grant No. RDU 223313, as well as additional financial support under Doctoral Research Scheme (DRS).
Funding
The authors would like to thank Ministry of Higher Education for providing financial support under fundamental research grant Scheme (FRGS) No. (FRGS/1/2022/TK01/UMP/02/5 (university reference RDU(220112) and Universiti Malaysia Pahang AL-Sultan Abdullah (UMPSA) for laboratories facilities as well as additional support under internal grant No. RDU 223313, as well as additional financial support under Doctoral Research Scheme (DRS).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MIAB Writing- Original draft preparation, Writing Reviewing and Editing. RE: Supervision, Writing-Original draft preparation, Writing Reviewing and Editing. AS Writing Reviewing and Editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethical approval
We confirm the ethic approval.
Consent to participate
All the authors and contributors have consent for this article.
Consent for publication
All authors and contributors have consent to publish in this journal.
Human and animal rights and informed consent
This article does not contain any studies involving animals or human participants performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Al Biajawi, M.I., Embong, R. & Shubbar, A. Engineering properties of self-compacting concrete incorporating coal bottom ash (CBA) as sustainable materials for green concrete: a review. J Build Rehabil 8, 105 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41024-023-00352-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41024-023-00352-9