Introduction

Wadi Qena is one of the longest wadis in the Eastern Desert of Egypt. It is a promising dry valley in the central Eastern Desert. The wadi  is the unique obsequent wadi in the Eastern Desert of Egypt. It collects sporadic rainfalls from many effluents, which join the main stream along the 270 km course from the east to southeast. The wadi extends from north to south with an average east–west average width of 40 km. It is located at the northwest of Qena Governorate and extends between Qena City and Hurgada at the Red Sea, covering a surface area of about 18,000 km2 (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Location map of the study area showing the new road

Many previous studies have been carried out to investigate the geologic, geomorphological and hydrologic features of the wadi. Aggour (1997) investigated the impacts of geomorphological and geological conditions of the wadi. Gheith and Sultan (2002) estimated the probable groundwater recharge rate for alluvial aquifers of the Eastern Desert (i.e., Wadi Qena) from the sporadic precipitation over the Red Sea hills (during the 1994 rain storm events) as 49 × 106 m3, which indicates the promising nature of the Quaternary alluvial aquifer in the area. The hydraulic interconnection between the Quaternary aquifer and the underlying Nubian aquifer system in Wadi Qena is favored through the structural region (Elewa et al. 2000, 2006, 2011). Using isotopic and geochemical analysis along with field and remote sensing data, Sultan et al. (2000) showed that the discharge of the Nubian aquifer occurs on a large scale primarily through the deep-seated fault system, and the ascending groundwater discharges into the relatively thick alluvial aquifers proximal to the fault complex that define the River Nile. Based on the pumping test data, Elewa and Abu El Ella (2011)concluded that the hydrogeological system in the wadi is made of four layers: the upper layer contains unconfined Quaternary wadi deposits, the second and the third are considered as aquiclude and the bottom layers is the Nubian aquifer system followed by the basement rocks.

The preset study is focused on the description of the hydrogeochemical properties of groundwater in the central part of Wadi Qena. Samples were collected from the available groundwater wells and subjected to chemical analysis for the major and minor elements and environmental isotopes. The study aims to evaluate the origin of groundwater and its suitability for drinking and irrigation purposes. The saturation of groundwater with carbonate minerals was investigated. To accomplish that, the following stages were established:

  1. 1.

    Field measurements of the unstable parameters such as pH, EC, TDS and the collection of water samples from all available wells in the area were obtained (26 samples as shown in Fig. 2). These samples were subjected to detailed chemical analysis for the anions and cations at the laboratory of Applied Geochemistry in Faculty of Science, Sohag University. The results were analyzed and represented in the different graphs for identification of water characteristics, origin and suitability for different purposes.

    Fig. 2
    figure 2

    Location map of groundwater samples in the study area

  2. 2.

    The thermodynamic stability of groundwater was studied using the saturation index (SI) to define the saturation status regarding the carbonate and iron minerals.

  3. 3.

    Twenty-two water samples ware subjected to environmental isotope analysis to define the relative age of groundwater in the area. The analyses were carried out at the National Center for Nuclear Safety and Radiation Control, Atomic Energy Authority in Cairo.

Geology of the area

Many publications are available on the geology of Wadi Qena, among which are those by Ghorab (1956), Youssef (1957), Said (1960), Ghorab (1961), Said (1962), Awad and Ghobrial (1965), Said (1971, 1975, 1981); Hendriks and Kallenbach (1986), Hendriks et al. (1987), Bandel et al. (1987), Hermina et al. (1989), Hermina, (1990), Said (1990), Abdallah et al. (1992), Issawi et al. (1999), Abdel Moneim (2005) and Wilmsen and Nagm (2012).

The sedimentary succession of Wadi Qena generally ranges from Paleozoic to Quaternary deposits (Figs. 3, 4). Most of the Paleozoic rocks are non-marine and well represented in the northern part of the wadi. The distribution of the Paleozoic sediments was more or less controlled by older pre-Cenomanian structural events (Said, 1990; Issawi et al. 1999). The first marine influence is documented in the central and northern parts of Wadi Qena which occur within the Upper Lower Cretaceous deposits. The marine transgression was continued with some phases of regressions later on during the Late Cretaceous and Tertiary. This resulted in the deposition of the most sedimentary rocks of Wadi Qena. Table 1 summarizes the existing formations, age and lithology of the recorded geologic units in Wadi Qena.

Fig. 3
figure 3

A geologic map of Wadi Qena area (after CONOCO 1987; EGSMA 1983, 2006)

Fig. 4
figure 4

Lithostratigraphic columnar section of Wadi Qena (after CONOCO 1987; EGSMA 1983, 2006)

Table 1 Summary of the geologic units recorded in Wadi Qena

Structurally, Wadi Qena anticline represents one of the oldest systems in the stable shelf of Egypt (Hume 1929; Sandford 1929; Said 1962; Billings 1954; Stern and Hedge 1985; CONOCO 1987; EGSMA 1983, 2006, El Gaby et al. 1988; Aggour 1997; Abdel Ghany 2011). It has a great amplitude and gentle dip and plunges southward. Its axis runs almost in the north–south direction and coincides with the Wadi Qena main trunk. The concerned anticline covers most of the Wadi Qena hydrographic basin and is displayed in the area between latitudes 26° 30′ and 28° 00′ N for a distance of more than 200 km.

Hydrogeology of the area

Most of the hydrogeological studies that have been carried out in Wadi Qena were focused mainly on the downstream of the wadi, among these are those by El Ramly (1972), Gomaa (1992), Thorweihe and Heinl (1993), Aggour and Sadek (2001), Assiut University (2001), Yehia (2001), Abdel Moneim (2005) and Seleem (2014). The review of pervious publications indicated that groundwater in Wadi Qena and its surroundings exists with different potentials in six aquifers under different hydrogeologic conditions. These units are: Quaternary alluvium aquifer, Pliocene sandstone aquifer, Lower Maastrichtian phosphate aquifer, Companion marl aquifer, Turonian–Santonian sandstone aquifer, Precambrian basement complex aquifer. Water in these aquifers exist under free water table conditions expected that of the last one (known as Nubain aquifer system) where confined conditions are prevaling. Abdel Moneim (2005) revealed that the most promising aquifers are the (from quantity point of view) Quaternary and the Nubian water-bearing formations.

The Quaternary alluvial deposits are formed of sand, gravel and boulders, filling the courses of the hydrographic basins. They have lateral and vertical variations in the lithological composition according to the dominated rock exposures in the hydrographic basins. The Quaternary alluvium aquifer is affected by different environmental conditions, representing the areal variation of thickness, texture, composition and water chemistry. The thickness of the Quaternary alluvial deposits varies in Wadi Qena from place to place due to the undulation of subsurface strata and the effective erosion of surface layers in other places. In general, the thickness increases downstream of the wadi and reaches 100 m at the downstream (Seleem 2013).

Groundwater in the Nubian aquifer occurs under confined condition and the exploited part lies below the mean sea level. The overlying impermeable Quseir shale is considered as the confining bed overlying the sandstone series. The depth to the Nubian aquifer differs from one locality to another and depends on the geological condition in the area. It ranges from 300 to 500 m below the ground surface with an average thickness of 350 m (Abdel Moneim 2005). The flow of the groundwater in the Nubian sandstone aquifer in Wadi Qena is defined to be from the northeast to southeast (Aggour 1997).

Geochemsity of groundwater

The evaluation of the geochemical characteristics of groundwater in the study area is based on the detailed chemical analysis of the 26 water samples (20 for the Quaternary aquifer system (QAS) and 6 for Nubian sandstone aquifer system (NSAS). The differentiation between the QAS and the NSAS is based on the depth of sampling and description of the lithologic logs of the wells in relation to the existing geologic conditions in addition to the review of the available literature. The result of the chemical analysis is given in Tables 2 and 3. The following is the description of the main findings.

Table 2 Chemical analysis data of the collected water samples from QAS in the study area
Table 3 Chemical analysis data of the collected water samples from NSAS in the study area

Total dissolved solids (TDS)

The TDS in QAS varies from 1183 ppm (well no. Q4) to 5506 ppm (well no. Q18), while its varies from 1496 ppm (well no. N6) to 1715 ppm (well no. N1) for the NSAS (Figs. 5, 6), respectively. The iso-salinity distribution map of QAS (Fig. 5) and NSAS (Fig. 6) shows a general increase toward the south of the study area which may reflect a continuous recharge from the rainfall. The increase of the TDS in both aquifers is in accordance with the direction of groundwater flow, reflecting the impact of the leachate effects of water-bearing formations.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Iso-salinity distribution of the groundwater of QAS in the study area

Fig. 6
figure 6

Iso-salinity distribution of the groundwater of NSAS in the study area

Distribution of major ions

The most common elements found in groundwater include four cations, calcium, magnesium, sodium and potassium, and four anions, bicarbonate, carbonate, sulfate and chloride. These anions and cations are present in the water in detectable amounts and govern its physical and chemical characteristics. The source of sodium in water depends on the rock type through which the water moved. The sodium content of the groundwater in the QAS in the study area ranges from about 197 ppm (well no. Q4) to 1210 ppm (well no. Q20) (Table 2, Fig. 7), and ranges from about 345 ppm (well no. N4) to 411 ppm (well no. N1) for NSAS (Table 3, Fig. 8). Generally, in QAS the sodium content increases from the north to the south regions. On the other hand, the sodium content of NSAS increases from the south to the north regions, probably due to the impact of the lithology of the NSAS.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Iso- sodium map of QAS in the study area

Fig. 8
figure 8

Iso- sodium map of NSAS in the study area

Calcium occurs in carbonates such as limestone and dolomite and in sulfate such as gypsum and anhydrite. For QAS, the maximum measured calcium concentration value in the study area (567 ppm) was recorded in sample no. Q17, while the lowest value (55 ppm) was recorded in sample no. Q6 (Table 2). In NSAS, the maximum measured calcium concentration value (115 ppm) was recorded in sample no. N1, while the lowest value (88 ppm) was recorded in sample no. N6 (Table 3). Generally, in QAS the calcium content increases from the north to south regions and reaches its higher values in the south (well no. Q17). On the other hand, the calcium content of NSAS increases from the south to the north regions as the aquifers approached the calcium carbonates of the Thebes Formation.

Magnesium is abundant in rocks and soil containing limestone, dolomites and gypsum. The maximum measured magnesium concentration value (183 ppm) was recorded in sample no. Q14 and Q15, while the lowest value (18 ppm) was recorded in sample no. Q4 for QAS (Table 2). For NSAS, the maximum measured magnesium concentration value (58 ppm) was recorded in sample no. N3, while the lowest value (46 ppm) was recorded in sample no. N6 for NSAS (Table 3). The magnesium content in QAS increases from north to south with the flow direction, while it increases in the reverse direction for NSAS. This may be attributed to the impacts of the aquifer lithology.

Potassium in groundwater is generated from the silicate rocks minerals that contain potassium as the potash feldspars, orthoclase and microcline. Potassium salts are less readily available as solution in water in the clastic sediments. Potassium represents the lowest cations in the groundwater samples. In the study area, the potassium content in groundwater ranged between 4 ppm (well no. Q4 and Q7) to 14 ppm (well no. Q18) for QAS (Table 2) and from 5 ppm (well no. N6) to 12 ppm (well no. N1) for NSAS (Table 3).

Chloride in groundwater may originate in evaporate deposits or from seawater trapped in sediments during their deposition. Other sources of chloride include solution of dry atmospheric fallout, municipal sewage and industrial wastes (does not exist in the study area). With regard to the distribution of chloride content in the groundwater of the study area, it ranges from about 173 ppm (well no. Q4) to 2142 ppm (well no. Q18) for QAS (Table 2), while in NSAS the chloride concentration varies between 566 and 649 ppm. Generally, the chloride content for QAS increases to the south direction (Fig. 9). On the other hand, the chloride content for NSAS increases at the north direction (Fig. 10).

Fig. 9
figure 9

Iso-chloride zonation map of QAS in the study area

Fig. 10
figure 10

Iso-chloride zonation map of NSAS in the study area

Bicarbonate and carbonate ions in groundwater exist due to dissolved carbon dioxide in rains which, as it enters the soil, dissolves more carbon dioxide. The bicarbonate content of the groundwater in the QAS in the study area ranges from 89 ppm (well no. Q20) to 578 ppm (well no. Q14) (Table 2) and from 130 ppm (well no. N3) to 172 ppm (well no. N6) for NSAS (Table 3). Generally, in QAS the bicarbonate content increases at the southern part of the study area and reaches its higher values (well no. Q14), while the lower value is recorded at the northern part, where higher rainfall in this area has taken place. On the other hand, the bicarbonate content for NSAS increases at the southern part of the study area.

Sulfate is useful for understanding oxidation–reduction conditions in groundwater and for predicting the fate of contaminants, such as industrial solvent. With regard to the distribution of sulfate content in the groundwater of the study area, it ranges from about 251 ppm (well no. Q6) to 1781 ppm (well no. Q15) for QAS (Table 2), while in NSAS it varies between 237 and 338 ppm. Generally, the sulfate content for QAS increases to the south of the study area; this may be attributed to the effect of soil salinity. On the other hand, the sulfate content for NSAS increases toward the north of the study area.

Major ion relationships in QAS and NSAS

The ion ratios enable possible determination of the origin of water and detection of the hydrochemical processes acted in water, such as contamination, mixing and ion exchange. Such relationships could be studied through the calculation of the hydrochemical coefficients of the water samples, characterized to the two present aquifers in the study area. A summary of the calculation of the hydrochemical parameters is given in Table 4.

Table 4 Maximum, minimum and average hydrochemical parameters of QAS and NSAS

The rNa+/rCl coefficient is of special importance; it is used in detecting the groundwater origin (marine or meteoric). In the sea water, this coefficient is less than the unity while it attain more than unity in the meteoric water. In the study area the values of rNa+/rCl coefficient for 25 % of the samples collected from the QAS have less than one while the rest of samples in the QAS (75 %) have more than unity, which reflects a meteoric water origin. But the excess of chloride than sodium in the other samples are attributed to the chemical local reaction due to enrichment of sodium or local ionic exchange reaction. For the NSAS, all the groundwater samples (100 %) have less than unity reflecting the marine water origin of groundwater.

The rSO4 /rCl ratio is useful as a guide for detecting any excess in sulfate content in the groundwater due to dissolution of calcium sulfate or precipitation of calcium carbonate. This ratio indicates the dissolution of sulfate minerals, i.e., gypsum and anhydrite. The value of this ratio in the majority of water samples collected from the QAS (95 %) is less than unity. This reflects a limited solution of the local terrestrial source of sulfate, such as gypsum and anhydrite minerals in groundwater. The rest of the samples (5 %) have rSO4 /rCl more than unity. The value of this ratio in all the water samples from the NSAS (100 %) is less than unity. This reflects a limited solution of the local terrestrial source of sulfate minerals in groundwater.

The rCa++/rMg++ parameter is important for tracing seawater contamination. High values may indicate a source of Ca as evaporates and active base exchange processes. Ca/Mg value in all wells from the QAS and the NSAS are more than one (except sample no. 10), where there is an increase in Ca ion content, which may result from the precipitation of calcium carbonate or calcium sulfate.

Regarding the (rCl rNa+/rCl), the negative values for this index indicate an active cation exchange process. This ratio in groundwater samples collected from the QAS (75 %) has negative value. This reflects a reaction between the groundwater and the aquifer sediments rich in clay lenses. The rest of the samples of the QAS (25 %) and all of the NSAS have positive values. They contain an abundance of NaCl salt and indicate low to moderately active ion exchange.

Groundwater genetic classification

The groundwater in the investigated area was classified using Sulin’s graph (1962) to detect its genesis. The representation of groundwater samples for the QAS in Sulin’s graph (Fig. 11a) indicated that the majority of wells in the study area were of meteoric origin (15 wells) and all of them had Na2SO4 content, while five wells were classified of marine origin and had MgCl2 content. This may indicate mixing of the meteoric and marine origin in the lower mixed part between the QAS and NSAS. On the other hand, all the samples of the NSAS (Fig. 11b) are located in the MgCl, indicating the marine origin of groundwater.

Fig. 11
figure 11

Sulin’s graph for genetic classification of groundwater in QAS (a) and NSAS (b)

Evaluation of groundwater for different purposes

Municipal purpose

The suitability of groundwater form the QAS and NSAS for drinking purposes were evaluated based on the Egyptian drinking water quality standards (ARE 2007). A comparison between the allowable limits for the TDS, cations and anions is given in Table 5. According to the table, the water is not suitable for drinking purposes, as all the samples contain concentration of one element or other above the allowable limits for drinking purposes.

Table 5 Water quality for drinking purposes in the QAS and NSAS

The total hardness plays a very important role in domestic water, whereas the total hardness should be below 120 epm (Hem 1970). The most controlling factor in laundry water is the total hardness concentration (TH), which is determined by the relation between Ca2+ + Mg2+ (Hem 1970). The total hardness of the groundwater in the study area is more than 120 epm (hard water), as shown in Tables 2 and 3. Therefore, water is unsuitable for drinking water and domestic purposes.

Irrigation purposes

Four most common factors are considered herein for the evaluation of the usefulness of water for irrigation purposes in the study area. They are the total dissolved salts (TDS), sodium adsorption ratio (SAR), residual sodium carbonates (RSC) and chloride content (Cl).

The concentration of the total dissolved salts (TDS) is considered to be an indication to the degree of salinity problems that might be anticipated when the groundwater is used for irrigation purposes. The US Salinity Laboratory classification (1954) differentiates the water sources into five categories according to salinity and therefore electric conductivity (E.C). Based on this diagram, the studied groundwater samples are located in the categories C3, C4 and C5, where C3 (sample no. Q4, Q5, Q6 and Q7) is suitable to some extent, so special management for salinity control may be required and plants with good salt tolerance should be selected. The water of other category (C4), samples nos. Q1, Q2, Q3, Q8, Q9, Q10, N1, N2, N3, N4, N5 and N6, are not suitable for irrigation under ordinary conditions, but may be used occasionally under very special circumstances. The soil must be permeable and water management for salinity control and leaching is necessary to remove the excess salts. Salt-tolerant crops must be chosen in this case. The excessive saline water (C5) is represented by the well nos. Q11,Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18,Q19 and Q20. This category is generally unsuitable for irrigation; plants of high salt tolerance must be chosen and frequent leaching must be carried out to prevent serious salinity.

Wilcox (1948) suggested a useful nomogram for water suitability for irrigation (the nomogram was modified later by US Department of Irrigation (1954), is that based on the sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) the water is classified into four types. From the plots of the analyzed water samples, they are considered to be within two main categories (Figs. 12, 13). The first category consists of water of very high salinity and medium SAR (C4-S2), which is represented by nine groundwater samples (well nos. Q1, Q2, Q3, N1, N2, N3, N4, N5 and N6). Special management should be followed to reduce salinity with selection of salt-tolerant crops on soil of good permeability with special leaching. The second main category consists of water of very high salinity and high SAR (C4S3) where three samples are located (sample nos. Q8, Q9 and Q10). This water is not suitable for irrigation under ordinary conditions, but may be used occasionally under very special circumstances. The soil must be permeable, drainage must be adequate, irrigation must be applied in excess to provide considerable leaching and highly salt-tolerant crops should be selected. The rest of the samples are located outside the nomogram where they contain high amounts and SAR and TDS. In conclusion, the results indicated that the drainage condition of the soil in the area should be improved to increase the crop productivity in the area.

Fig. 12
figure 12

Classification of groundwater for irrigation of QAS (U.S. Salinity Laboratory Staff 1954)

Fig. 13
figure 13

Classification of groundwater for irrigation of NSAS (U.S. Salinity Laboratory Staff 1954)

Eaton (1950) had classified the water for irrigation considering its bicarbonate content. He introduced the residual sodium carbonate (RSC) value expressed by the relation between carbonate, bicarbonate, calcium and magnesium concentrations in water (in meq/l). The RSC is used to distinguish between the different water classes for irrigation purposes. Moreover, the high concentration of bicarbonate ions in the irrigation water leads to its toxicity and affects the mineral nutrition of plants. The RSC values range from −2.2 to −37.62 epm/l with an average of −17.38 for the QAS, while it ranges from −5.35 to −7.88 with an average of −6.77 epm for NSAS. This is an indication of the fact that water is of very good quality, non hazard and suitable for irrigation purposes (as the RSC is <1.25 epm).

Taylor and Oza (1954) classified the groundwater for irrigation according to chloride content. According to their classification, the studied groundwater sample of 1 well (no. Q4) is considered to be of good quality and suitable for all tolerant plants and 4 wells are considered to be of fair quality and suitable for all tolerant plants, while 11 wells are undesirable for irrigation except for salt-tolerant plants. On the other hand, ten wells were highly undesirable for irrigation, except for highly salt-tolerant plants (Table 6).

Table 6 Suitability of water for irrigation in the study area based on the chloride content (Taylor 1954)

Livestock and poultry purposes

High salinity in water can cause physiological changes or even death of livestock. The suitability of water for livestock and poultry depending on salinity values is studied based on FAO (1984) guidelines. The results showed that 16 groundwater samples (10 of QAS and 6 of NSAS) have salinity ranging from 1000 to 2999 mg/L. These are very satisfactory for all classes of livestock and poultry, but may cause temporary and mild diarrhea in livestock not accustomed to such water, or watery dropping in poultry. Five groundwater samples from the QAS had relatively high salinity content (3000–4999 ppm). The use of this type may cause temporary diarrhea or may be refused at first by animals not accustomed to it. Also, it often causes watery feces, increased mortality and decreased growth. The resuts showed that the salinity contents of five samples collected from the QAS are of high salinity content (5000–6999 ppm) and have a considerable risk if this water is used for the dairy beef cattle, for sheep, swine and horses.

Chemical equilibrium and saturation index (SI)

The saturation indices are used to express the water tendency toward precipitation or dissolution. The degree of water saturation with respect to a mineral is given by; SI = log (K IAP/K sp), where K IAP is the ionic activity product, K sp is the solubility product and SI is the saturation index of the concerned mineral. When SI is equal to zero, the water is at equilibrium or saturated with the mineral phase; if SI value is less than zero (negative value), this indicates that water is undersaturated and that the mineral phase tends to dissolve, whereas SI value over zero (positive value) indicates the supersaturation of water and that the mineral phase tends to precipitate. The saturation indices (SI) of the major mineral phases in the different aquifers in the investigated groundwater samples were calculated using the software package (NETPATH-WIN, El kadi et al. 2010). The obtained results (Fig. 14) reflect that:

Fig. 14
figure 14

Saturation indices with respect to minerals in the QAS and NSAS samples

  1. 1.

    The groundwater is supersaturated with respect to iron mineral phases (hematite, goethite) where the SI is above zero. Hematite, goethite and siderite reflect the sensitivity of iron to oxidation even in low concentrations.

  2. 2.

    The groundwater in the two aquifers is undersaturated with respect to the main carbonate minerals (calcite, aragonite, dolomite, siderite and rhodochrosite) and also undersaturated regarding sulfate minerals (gypsum and Anhydrite). This is clear where the pH values reflect a slightly alkaline character. The main source of carbonates in this aquifer is the atmosphere, where CO2 reacts with the rainwater to form the bicarbonate ions in addition to leaching of carbonate materials.

Isotope analysis and age dating

The usefulness of stable isotopes as tracer in hydrology has been demonstrated since the emergence of the field of isotope geochemistry in the 1950s. The earliest applications of isotopes as tracers were in the identification of clear-cut isotopic relationships between 18O and 2H in worldwide waters, arising due to isotopic fractionation occurring in the hydrological cycles (Craig 1961).

In the study area, 22 water samples were collected in April 2013 (Fig. 15) and subjected to environmental isotope analysis. The result is shown in Table 7.

Fig. 15
figure 15

Location map of groundwater samples for isotope analysis

Table 7 δ18O and δ2H values for groundwater samples in the study area

Hamza et al. (2009) presented a scheme of the application of the two-component mixing model with the correction of δ18O values for evaporative isotope enrichment (Fig. 16. The raw and corrected δ18O values of the Nile water are represented by the points 1 and 2, respectively. The determined δ18O value of the sample and the corrected ones using a slope of 5.8 are represented by the points 3 and 4. The end member value of the Nubian sandstone water is found at point 5.

Fig. 16
figure 16

Scheme of the application of the two-component mixing model with the correction of the δ18O values for evaporative isotope enrichment (Hamza et al. 2009)

The water samples from wells in the groundwater samples yielded δ18O and δ2H values ranging from −7.07 to −2.64 ‰ and from −52.33 to −23.50 ‰, respectively (Table 7). The mean values for all data are −4.99 and −35.62 ‰ for δ18O and δ2H, respectively. The results of the δ18O/δ2H in Hamza et al. ‘s diagram is shown in Fig. 17. A few data fit the Global Meteoric Water Line with d = 10 ‰ and the others belong to a local palaeowater line with d = −4.5 ‰. Four samples were located near the NSAS point.

Fig. 17
figure 17

Delta O-18 vs. delta D diagram for groundwater samples

From the evaluation of the isotope data and the results indicated in (Fig. 17), it is concluded that

  1. 1.

    The water samples of well nos. 6, 12, 13 and 20 collected from the deep wells (more than 500 m deep and known in the literature as Nubian wells (Abdel Moneim 2005; Elewa et al. 2000, 2006, 2011) are mainly of Nubian sources (old water) and could be mixed with recharge from the Quaternary water. Also, water may be extracted from these wells not only from the Nubian sediments, but also from the overlaying Quaternary succession (the design of these wells is not available).

  2. 2.

    The other water samples (well nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 11, 18, 19, 21 and 22) are located nearer to the Nile freshwater, indicating Quaternary water age.

  3. 3.

    The water samples collected from the shallow pits (sample nos. 14, 15, 16 and 17) are located much more nearer to the Nile water, revealing that water originated from the relatively recent fresh rain water.

Conclusion and recommendation

The study area covers part of Wadi Qena which is one of the largest wadis in the Eastern Desert of Egypt. The construction of a new desert road connecting Upper Egypt to the Red Sea has accelerated different forms of agricultural development in the wadi. Large numbers of wells were drilled in the wadi to extract water for cultivation activities, and this road provides wonderful opportunities to carry out hydrogeological and hydrogeochemical studies in such a remote area.

The sedimentary succession of Wadi Qena ranges from Paleozoic to Quaternary deposits. Large anticline represents one of the oldest systems in the stable shelf of Egypt of the Wadi Qena and plays a considerable role in the distribution, depth and thickness of the hydrogeologic unit in the area. The main groundwater bearing formations in the study area are the Quaternary aquifer that is formed of sand, gravel and boulders and the Nubian sandstone aquifer. The thickness of the Quaternary aquifers ranges between 20 and 100 m and increases toward the downstream of the wadi. Groundwater in the Nubian aquifer occurs under confined condition (overlying the impermeable Quseir Shale). The depth to the Nubian aquifer ranges from 300 to 500 m below the ground surface with an average thickness of 350 m and decreases toward the north. The flow of the groundwater in the Nubian sandstone aquifer in Wadi Qena is defined to be from the northeast to southeast.

The evaluation of the obtained results of the chemical analysis of the 26 samples [20 of the Quaternary aquifer system (QAS) and 6 of the Nubian sandstone aquifer system (NSAS)] indicates that the TDS in QAS varies from 1183 to 5506 ppm and from 1496 to 1715 ppm for the NSAS. It ranges between slightly saline and moderately saline for the QAS and slightly saline for the NSAS.

The evaluation of the hydrochemical parameters and presentations of the obtained data in the different diagrams indicated the meteoric water origin at the QAS and the marine origin in the NSAS aquifer. The evaluation indicated that the local terrestrial sources such as gypsum and anhydrite increases the sulfates content in groundwater. Accordingly, the continuous extraction of groundwater from the Nubian aquifer is expected to lead to water depletion of the aquifer as it is not a renewable aquifer.

Regarding the suitability of groundwater extracted from both QAS and NSAS for drinking and domestic uses, the result indicated that water in the area was not suitable for drinking purposes. The TDS, TH and the concentration of the cations and anions are higher than the allowable Egyptian drinking water standards.

The evaluation of the suitability of groundwater for irrigation purposes was discussed based on four common parameters, TDS, SAR, RSC and chloride content. The results showed that water from both aquifers (particularly the QAS) was suitable for irrigation of moderate to high salt-tolerant crops. Special arrangement should be made to improve the drainage condition in the area to increase crop productivity. The high concentration of TDS in the area is expected to lead to soil logging problem in the near future. Frequent leaching must be carried out to prevent serious salinity problems.

Regarding the suitability of water for the livestock and poultry, the 16 groundwater samples (10 of QAS and 6 of NSAS) had salinity ranging from 1000 to 2999 mg/L. These are highly satisfactory for all classes of livestock and poultry, but may cause temporary and mild diarrhea in livestock not accustomed to such water, or watery dropping in poultry. Groundwater extraction from the Nubian aquifer is more favorable for livestock and poultry than water extracted from the Quaternary aquifer.

The values of the water saturation index in the study area indicated that groundwater was supersaturated with respect to iron mineral phases, whereas undersaturated with respect to the main carbonate minerals. Therefore, deposition of iron minerals and dissolution of the carbonates are expected.

The analysis of the isotope data (δ18O and δ2H) of the water samples from wells in the aquifers indicated that δ18O and δ2H values ranging from −7.07 to −2.64 ‰ and from −52.33 to −23.50 ‰ were yielded, respectively. The water samples of wells more than 500 m deep were mainly of Nubian sources (old water) and could be mixed by recharge from the Quaternary water. The other samples extracted water from the Quaternary water. The water samples collected from the shallow pits showed that water originated from the recent fresh rain water.

It is recommended that the following should be carried out for better management of the use of groundwater and crop productivity in the study area:

  1. 1.

    Extraction from the Quaternary aquifer should be stopped as it is not suitable for irrigation. Continuous pumping from the aquifer will cause soil logging in the near future and reduce crop productivity.

  2. 2.

    Extraction of water from the Nubian aquifer system should be managed properly (using sprinkler or drip irrigation) to avoid aquifer depletion, as the water is of marine origin and not renewable water.

  3. 3.

    Drainage condition should be improved continuously using the soil washing techniques to reduce the expected building up of soil salinity (soil logging) that will decrease the crop productivity.

  4. 4.

    Continuous monitoring of the water quality should be undertaken to evaluate the changes in the water quality in the area.