Abstract
Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is one of the most widely grown legumes in the world. Although the crop has high yield potential, average yields in Brazil are low due to several diseases. Angular leaf spot (ALS), caused by Pseudocercospora griseola, is among the most important diseases. A set of 81 accessions from the Instituto Agronômico (IAC, Campinas, SP) germplasm bank were evaluated for ALS resistance and genotyped by 12 microsatellites previously associated with ALS QTL resistance. Allele frequencies, number of alleles per locus, expected heterozygosity (He), and Shannon’s Information Index (I) were calculated. The average Ho was 0.12, and the He was 0.54. The STRUCTURE analysis and UPGMA clustering based on Nei’s genetic distance indicated a moderate degree of genetic diversity, with 4 and 5 main groups, respectively. Evaluation of the severity of ALS showed that 17% of the accessions had resistance. Cultivars were recommended for breeding crosses aimed at gaining in genetic diversity and resistance to ALS.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is an important source of protein, natural fiber, and calories that, together with rice, constitutes a staple food with nutritional and economic importance for the Brazilian population (Broughton et al. 2003; Hefni et al. 2010; Bellucci et al. 2014). Brazil is the largest consumer and the third largest producer with estimated production of about 2360 thousand tons (CONAB 2019). Brazil may be considered a secondary center of common bean diversification (Valentini et al. 2018). However, the major constraint to bean production is the occurrence of several diseases caused by fungi, viruses, bacteria, and nematodes (Schwartz and Pastor-Corrales 1989; Schwartz et al. 2005).
Angular leaf spot (ALS) caused by fungus, Pseudocercospora griseola (Sacc.) Crous & Braun, is one of the most serious diseases of common bean in tropical and subtropical countries and losses in the crop due to ALS can be as high as 80% (Stenglein et al. 2003; Miklas et al. 2006; Crous et al. 2006; Singh and Schwartz 2010). More than 40 races of P. griseola have been identified (Wagara et al. 2004; Nay et al. 2019a) and a successful resistance breeding strategy requires a thorough understanding of the host-pathogen interaction and the characterization of genetic and phenotypic resistance (Correa-Victoria et al. 1989; Liebenberg and Pretorius 1997).
P. vulgaris accessions are classified into two distinct gene pools, the Andean and the Mesoamerican (Schmutz et al. 2014), and P. griseola isolates have the same classification, due to the process of co-evolution between pathogen and host (Guzmán et al. 1995; Wagara et al. 2004). Isolates from the Mesoamerican group have greater genetic variability and infect both Mesoamerican and Andean bean cultivars, while isolates from the Andean group only infect beans of the same origin (Pastor-Corrales and Jara 1995; Wagara et al. 2004).
The currently approved ALS resistance loci include three dominant and independent loci (Phg-1 - Carvalho et al. 1998; Phg-2 - Sartorato et al. 2000; Phg-3 - Gonçalves-Vidigal et al. 2013), as well as two major QTLs, Phg-4 and Phg-5 (Souza et al. 2016; Oblessuc et al. 2012; Keller et al. 2015; Bassi et al. 2017). In addition to these resistance loci, some cultivars are sources of resistance and have been reported on studies of phenotypic resistance evaluations (Aggarwal et al. 2004; Sartorato 2004; Tryphone et al. 2016; Pereira et al. 2019a, b).
The use of fungicides to control ALS is an efficient measure; however, it is expensive mainly for smallholder farmers (Nay et al. 2019a). The most cost-effective and environmentally friendly management strategy to control the disease is through resistant cultivars (Pastor-Corrales et al. 1998). The characterization of new sources of resistance became indispensable for the genetic improvement of the species (Oblessuc et al. 2012). However, resistance inheritance of angular leaf spot in common beans has shown to be complex in some situations due to the oligogenic nature of the ALS resistance (Oblessuc et al. 2012; Keller et al. 2015; Bassi et al. 2017; Perseguini et al. 2016). The development of common bean cultivars with durable ALS resistance is difficult and requires pyramiding of several ALS QTL (Quantitative Trait Loci, Mendonça et al. 2003; Oblessuc et al. 2012).
Common bean breeding programs usually focus exclusively on breeding lines and/or cultivars, using a narrowed-based germplasm which may be a limiting factor for genetic progress (Valentini et al. 2018). Success in developing new cultivars with gain in genetic diversity is highly dependent on the choice of divergent parents to compose the crosses in a breeding program (Perseguini et al. 2011). The accessions selected for the crosses must have the desirable agronomic traits and the greatest possible genetic divergence to exploit the maximum genetic variability. Thus, it is necessary to know the genetic and phenotypic variability of the available core collection before using it (Pereira et al. 2019a, b).
Therefore, the aim of the present study was to characterize 81 accessions from the core collection of the Instituto Agronômico (IAC, Campinas, SP) regarding resistance to ALS and the degree of genetic diversity using microsatellites previously associated with ALS resistance. The characterization of genetic and phenotypic resistance to ALS was used to select specific accessions for recombination, to obtain lines with high resistance and genetic diversity for ALS resistance loci.
Material and methods
Plant material, DNA extraction, and SSR genotyping
A total of 81 accessions were selected from the Active Germplasm Bank (BAG) of the Instituto Agronômico (IAC, Santa Elisa’s Farm, Campinas, SP, Brazil) to represent the genetic and phenotypic variability of the core collection proposed by Perseguini et al. (2015). The set exhibits wide variability for agronomic characteristics such as grain size, growth habit, yield, tolerance to abiotic stress, and disease resistance. The set includes several accessions used as parents in genetic mapping populations (Oblessuc et al. 2012; Sanglard et al. 2013; Bassi et al. 2017; Briñez et al. 2017; da Silva et al. 2018). All information on accessions, such as genealogy, commercial class, grain size, and institution, as well as the classification of the degree of ALS resistance and the genotype matrix, is available in the full list in the Supplementary Material 1.
For DNA extraction, three seeds from each accession were planted in pots kept in a greenhouse. The first trifoliate leaf was collected from plants at V3 phenological stage, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and lyophilized for 72 h. After lyophilization, the plant samples were ground in a mechanical mill (Cyclotec-1093 Sample Mill, Tecator), packed in hermetically sealed vials, and stored at − 20 °C. Total DNA from each sample was extracted from lyophilized plant material using the CTAB protocol proposed by CIMMYT (2005). DNA was quantified on a broad-spectrum spectrophotometer (Nanodrop 2000), diluted to 10 ng/μL. Integrity and quality were confirmed on 1% agarose stained by GelRed (Biotium, Inc.).
A set of 12 microsatellite (SSR) molecular markers associated with ALS resistance QTL (Oblessuc et al. 2012, 2013) were selected for genetic diversity analysis (Table 1). PCR were performed on the BioRad My Cycler thermocycler. For each reaction, 2.5 μL Milli-Q water, 7.5 μL Master Mix (Promega), 1 μL of each primer (0.8 pmol/μL - forward and reverse), and 30 ng of genomic DNA were used, in a final volume of 15 μL. The amplification conditions were 1 min at 94 °C, followed by 30 cycles of 1 min at 94 °C, 1 min at each SSR specific annealing temperature, and 1 min at 72 °C, with a final extension of 5 min at 72 °C. The quality of the amplifications was visualized on 3% agarose stained by GelRed (Biotium, Inc.). The PCR product was visualized in automated genotyping Fragment Analyzer™ 96 (Plant Genetic Resource Center, Instituto Agronômico, Campinas, SP, Brazil) using the DNF-905 double-stranded DNA Reagent Kit (Advanced analytical Technologies, Ames, IA, USA). The PROSize™ 2.0 software included in the advanced Fragment Analyzer™ 96 system was used to visually select strong, clear polymorphic DNA bands for scoring. The genetic matrix containing the fragment size of each reaction was converted to a GenAlEx format file.
Evaluation of resistance to ALS
The evaluation of resistance to ALS was carried out using an isolate of P. griseola (provided by Dr. Elaine Aparecida de Souza from the Genetics and Plant Breeding Department, UFLA, MG, Brazil) characterized as physiological race 31-31, according to the series of differentiating cultivars proposed by Pastor-Corrales and Jara (1995). The high virulence isolate classified as a Mesoamerican race was chosen due to the capacity to infect both Andean and Mesoamerican beans with the same intensity. The experiment was performed in an inoculation chamber (Santa Elisa’s Farm – Instituto Agronômico), in a randomized block design with four replications. Each plot consisted of a pot with two plants. Thus, a total of 8 seeds of each accession were pre-germinated and transplanted to plastic pots (11 × 8 × 9 cm) containing plant substrate (Plantmax®), in a greenhouse, where they remained for 15 days. Upon reaching the V3 phenological stage, the pots were transferred to an inoculation chamber, where they remained under controlled temperature (24 °C), relative humidity (95–100%), and photoperiod (12 h/12 h) conditions.
For inoculation, the monosporic isolate 31-31 was subcultured in Petri dishes containing V8 medium (1.61% agar, 0.25% calcium carbonate, 61.94% distilled water, and 36.2% Campbell’s V8 vegetable juice) 3 days after planting the accessions and incubated at 24 °C for 14 days, with 12 h of photoperiod, to induce sporulation. The inoculum suspension was prepared by the addition of 5 mL of sterile water to each plate containing the pathogen colonies, followed by scraping for conidia release. The final suspension was filtered and diluted to a concentration of 4 × 104 conidia mL−1 and, before inoculation, a drop of Tween 20 (0.1 mL/L−1) was added. Inoculation occurred 24 h after the plants were transferred to the inoculation chamber with the aid of De Vilbiss atomizer powered by an electric air compressor spraying on both the adaxial and abaxial surfaces of each leaf. The inoculation chamber consists of four large glass aquariums (4 × 1 × 1 m) with individual humidification system in a room with temperature control and artificial light. Five days after inoculation, the plants were transferred to a greenhouse and maintained with relative humidity and temperature around 75% and 28 °C, respectively. Symptoms were evaluated 15 days after inoculation using the diagrammatic scale (1–9) proposed by Van-Schoonhoven and Pastor-Corrales (1991), where plants with infection scores from 1 to 3 are considered resistant, from 4 to 6 moderately resistant, and from 7 to 9 susceptible.
Statistical analysis
Molecular data were used to calculate expected heterozygosity (He) and Shannon’s Information Index (I) using GenAlEx 6.5 (Peakall and Smouse 2012). Polymorphic Information Content (PIC) was estimated by the CERVUS 3.0.7 program (Kalinowski et al. 2007). Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed using the ADE 4 package (Dray et al. 2007), and genetic distance according to Nei (1978) was grouped by the UPGMA using the POPPR package (Kamvar et al. 2015) in the software R. For population structure analysis, the STRUCTURE v2.3.1 program (Pritchard et al. 2000) was used, with a burn-in period of 20,000 and 50,000 MCMC interactions, in a continuous series of groupings (K) ranging from 2 to 10 in 15 repetitions. The best K (DELTA K) was estimated by the method proposed by Evanno et al. (2005) through the STRUCUTURE HARVESTER program (Earl and Vonholdt 2012). The graphic was generated by the POPHELPER package (Francis 2017).
The final resistance evaluation score of each access in the four repetitions was understood by the arithmetic average of the two plants in each plot. The score values obtained were used for analysis of variance (ANOVA), the normality test (Shapiro and Wilk 1965), and the Scott and Knott (1974) means test by the EXPDes package (Ferreira et al. 2014). Broad-sense heritability was estimated by the RBio program (Bhering 2017) and the lower and upper limits for the confidence intervals were obtained according to Knapp et al. (1985).
Results
Resistance to ALS
Angular necrotic spots delimited by the leaf veins, symptoms that are typical of ALS disease, began to appear 12 days after inoculation. On the day of evaluation, the difference in severity between accessions was clear, being easy to distinguish plants with the presence of a few small nonsporulating lesions (resistant, score < 3) from plants with several sporulating lesions (susceptible, score > 3). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed significance for accessions (Table 2), allowing separation of cultivars through the means test. The significance for blocks is probably due to the variation of the relative humidity between the 4 aquariums of the inoculation chamber, highlights the importance of using the statistical design. Due to the quantitative nature of the disease, even with the well experiment conduction, the coefficient of variation was moderate (27%).
Data normality was tested by the Shapiro-Wilk test, which was not significant (P = 0.830). High broad-sense heritability estimated in 84% (confidence intervals = 79 and 89%) is considered relatively high, allowing the selection of superior accessions to ALS resistance. Regarding the Scott-Knott means test, four groups were formed, revealing high variability for resistance to ALS. The first group (a) was comprised of only 14 resistant accessions (Fig. 1).
Genetic diversity and population structure
The general diversity estimated for the 12 SSR markers associated with 7 ALS resistance loci showed that the mean number of alleles identified was 4 (2 to 6), the allele frequency ranged from 0.01 to 0.91, and the polymorphic information content (PIC) ranged from 0.13 to 0.72 (mean 0.51). Regarding the diversity parameters of the 81 accesses, the results evidenced moderate diversity for the markers used, with expected mean heterozygosity (He) and Shannon’s Information Index (I) estimated at 0.54 and 1.05, respectively.
Inference of genetic structure by Bayesian analysis (STRUCTURE) indicated division of the accessions into five groups (Fig. 2a). The grouping from STRUCTURE analysis with K = 5 is represented by Fig. 2b. The first group (blue cluster) was composed of mostly elite lines from the Instituto Agronômico (IAC), together with the AND 277 and CAL 143 cultivars. The second group, consisting mainly of lines from breeding programs, was the largest and corresponded to 99% membership coefficient of the IAC Carioca cultivar (the first carioca cultivar released). The third and fourth groups were mainly composed of older cultivars, such as IAC Pyatã, IAC Alvorada, IAC Aysó, IAC Apuã, IAC Maravilha, IAPAR 3, IAPAR 81, and Carioca MG. The last group (gray cluster) consisted of only 10 accessions, including BRS-Requinte and BRS Pérola, both released by EMBRAPA. Interestingly, the cultivars IAC Akytã and IAC Pyatã came from the same cross but were in different groups.
The UPGMA dendrogram based on Nei’s genetic distance matrix (Fig. 3) revealed considerable genetic variability of the set evaluated by the formation of four main groups in the dendrogram, the second group being the largest one. Cultivars resistant to ALS (red color) were distributed throughout all groups, allowing the selection of accessions as parents recommended for crosses aiming to obtain lines with high resistance and genetic diversity for the evaluated QTL. Genealogy information was also confirmed through the dendrogram, such as Gen05Pr11214, Gen05Pr1316, Gen05C43111, Gen05C63521, Gen05C44312, Gen05C32417, and Gen05C64512 lines, which all came from the same breeding program.
Selection of accessions for breeding
To obtain lines with gain in genetic variability, higher ALS resistance, and agronomic performance, 11 accessions and 9 parents’ pairs were selected (Table 3). The pairs were formed only from resistant accessions, and the cultivars’ pairs did not belong to the same group formed by the structure analysis (Fig. 2) and/or the dendrogram (Fig. 3). Aiming at reduction of the linkage drag and the segregation for grain color promoted by recombination of cultivars from different commercial classes, the pairs formed were limited to the commercial grain types.
The AND 277 (brindle grain) x SEA5 (red grain) cross was strategic for breeding of special bean varieties, since both have high resistance, wide genetic divergence, different genetic structure, and seed color classified as special commercial group. Gen05P5381 x Gen05P5482 improved lines were recommended to obtain new advanced lines from the black commercial group. The other seven pairs are recommendations for improvement of the carioca variety. Among them, the combination of the elite line LP0940 with the IAC Votuporanga and BRS Pérola cultivars, with 1.5, 1.8, and 2.6 severity scores, respectively, is the most outstanding.
Discussion
The most important agronomic trait for the common bean production chain is grain yield, as the financial return depends mainly on the quantity of grains produced (Pereira et al. 2019a, b). For this reason, the genetic breeding programs have as main goal the increase in productivity of the new bean cultivars to be released. Several other secondary traits are also improved with the aim of adding value, as plant size, grain tolerance to shelf storage, reduced cooking time, biofortification, heat and drought tolerance, and resistance to diseases. Yield is a complex trait influenced by biotic and abiotic factors, and it is a real challenge for breeders. However, it is possible to improve traits that are simpler and positively correlated with yield.
Incidence of diseases such as ALS can lead to serious production losses, depending on environmental conditions, the degree of cultivars resistance, and the virulence of the pathogen (Schwartz et al. 1981; Rava et al. 1985; 66 Jesus-Junior et al. 2001). Therefore, obtaining ALS-resistant cultivars directly influences yield and productivity. However, the basis of a breeding program for disease resistance is the genetic variability present in the germplasm bank, which can only be explored when well characterized and evaluated.
In the case of germplasm bank with a lot of accessions, the variability characterization becomes costly, and the best way is to select a reduced number of accessions that represents almost all the diversity of the active germplasm bank, so that the characterization becomes viable. According to Colombari Filho et al. (2010), the characterization of diversity may be more useful when evaluated in combination with genotype and phenotypic information of interest. Even though there are several studies on the genetic (Corrêa et al. 2001; Mahuku et al. 2011; Miller et al. 2018; Nay et al. 2019b) and phenotypic (Sannazzaro et al. 2003; Reis-Prado et al. 2006; Chataika et al. 2010; Pereira et al. 2019a, b) characterization of ALS resistance, as well as evaluation of the general genetic diversity of common bean accessions (Campa et al. 2018; Raatz et al. 2019; Valentini et al. 2018; Gioia et al. 2019), this is the first study involving phenotypic resistance evaluation in combination with genetic diversity of loci associated with ALS resistance.
Variance analysis of ALS phenotypical evaluations, using physiological race 31-31, in controlled inoculation condition (greenhouse), confirmed great variability among accessions shown by highly significant values of F tests. We found high heritability (84%) for ALS that corroborates previous studies. Oblessuc et al. (2012) estimated 69% of heritability in the evaluation of ALS resistance in a greenhouse and 81% under natural infection conditions. According to Amaro et al. (2007), the high heritability usually estimated for the ALS resistance allows phenotypic selection in early generations.
The groups formed by the Scott-Knott mean test are according to the resistance classification proposed by Van-Schoonhoven and Pastor-Corrales (1991), with group “a” composed of resistant cultivars, groups “b” and “c” of moderately resistant, and group “d” constituted by susceptible cultivars. Low number of ALS resistant cultivars was also reported in a recent phenotypic evaluation study using 144 cultivars, where only 7% of accessions showed resistance to both 63-63 and 63-23 isolates (Pereira et al. 2019a, b). Other studies have reported the high resistance of the AND 277 and CAL 143 cultivars and their importance as sources of genetic resistance (Gonçalves-Vidigal et al. 2011; Oblessuc et al. 2012; Bassi et al. 2017). However, both cultivars belong to the Andean gene pool, which makes it difficult to use them in the improvement of Mesoamerican cultivars, such as the carioca bean, that represents 70% of the varieties consumed in the country (Pereira et al. 2019a, b). Thus, the high resistance of the carioca cultivars IAC Votuporanga, BRS Pérola, IAC Pyatã, IAC Apuã, and LP0940 makes them extremely important sources of ALS resistance.
Regarding the diversity of the 12 SSRs used, our results were close to studies carried out on common beans with a larger number of markers. Perseguini et al. (2011) evaluated 70 SRRs in a set of carioca bean cultivars and identified an average PIC of 0.47 and several alleles ranging from 2 to 6. More recently, Delfini et al. (2017) analyzed a set of 39 Brazilian cultivars genotyped by 17 SSRs and reported a mean PIC of 0.33 and a mean number of alleles of 3.4 per locus. Furthermore, our results showed a higher degree of diversity for accessions than the ones reported by Delfini et al. (2017), with an average value of 0.69 for carioca cultivars and 0.65 for black tegument cultivars. The authors concluded that the evaluated set had moderate genetic diversity. Probably, the greater diversity found in the present study is mainly because this set of accessions was not limited to Brazilian commercial cultivars.
The genetic distance and STRUCTURE analysis confirmed the moderate degree of diversity of the evaluated group, with the formation of 4 and 5 groups, respectively. Interestingly, although the IAC UNA and IAC Alvorada cultivars do not have common parents, they were grouped together in the present study, agreeing with Perseguini et al. (2015) who analyzed the genetic distance with 180 accessions. Resistant accessions were grouped in all groups, which allow the selection and recommendation of nine cultivar pairs with high resistance and genetic divergence for recombination. According to Perseguini et al. (2011), the success of a breeding program in order to increase genetic diversity depends on the choice of divergent parents for the crosses. However, the bean breeder normally exploits only a small fraction of the genetic diversity available, and due to the difficulty in improving quantitative traits, recombinations tend to be only with elite cultivars to exploit additive inheritance (Pereira et al. 2019a, b). The problem is that the frequent use of elite cultivars in the bean breeding process leads to a high degree of kinship, diminishing the genetic base of commercial cultivars (Cooper et al. 2001).
In this sense, the hybridization pairs formed by the 11 selected accessions have great potential for the genetic improvement of the species, not only aiming at gaining ALS resistance but also to other agronomic traits of interest. In addition to the higher ALS resistance, the selected accessions showed genetic diversity accessed by 12 resistance loci evaluated, to increase genetic diversity and the diversification of alleles responsible for the resistance of the lines to be obtained by hybridization. Another advantage of the proposed pairs is the reduction of linkage drag and segregation for grain color since they were separated into commercial classes.
Between the selected pairs, the combination of the LP0940 elite line with the IAC Votuporanga and BRS Pérola cultivars is the most outstanding. In a study of yield, adaptability, and multiple resistance with 22 lines, Azevedo et al. (2015) found that LP0940 line (IAPAR) showed higher adaptability and yield than the standard cultivar (IAC Alvorada) for water and winter harvest, in addition to resistance to anthracnose and Fusarium wilt. In relation to the BRS Pérola cultivar, its approval by the producer market was so extensive that it changed the sieve yield standard, causing the carioca commercial variety to go from grain size 4.36 to 5.15 mm. On the other hand, the IAC Votuporanga cultivar was introduced in the 2000s aiming at grain quality and high yield (2853 kg/ha), which was higher than the BRS Pérola cultivar in the VCU evaluated over 3 years (2001, 2002, and 2003) (Chiorato and Carbonell 2014).
In summary, the characterization of ALS resistance on the 81 accessions, together with analysis of diversity, structure, and genetic divergence using the 12 microsatellites previously associated with the QTL resistance, allowed selection and recommendation of cultivars for breeding resistance to ALS with wide genetic diversity for the resistance loci evaluated. This fact not only enables resistant lines to be obtained but also ensures allelic variability to generate superior cultivars with durable resistance.
References
Aggarwal VD, Pastor-Corrales MA, Chirwa RM, Buruchara RA (2004) Andean beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) with resistance to the angular leaf spot pathogen (Phaeoisariopsis griseola) in southern and eastern Africa. Euphytica 136:201–210
Amaro GB, Abreu AFB, Ramalho MAP, Silva FB (2007) Phenotypic recurrent selection in the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L) with carioca-type grains for resistance to the fungi Phaeoisariopsis griseola and identification of RAPD markers linked to the resistance gene. Euphytica 134:297–303
Azevedo CBG, Ribeiro T, Silva DA, Carbonell SAM, Chiorato AF (2015) Adaptabilidade, estabilidade e resistência a patógenos em genótipos de feijoeiro. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 50:912–922
Bassi D, Briñez B, Rosa JS, Oblessuc PR, Almeida CP, Nucci SM, Silva LCD, Chiorato AF, Vianello RP, Camargo LEA, Blair MW, Benchimol-Reis LL (2017) Linkage and mapping quantitative loci associated with angular leaf spot and powdery mildew resistance in common beans. Genetics and Molecular Biology 40:109–122
Bellucci E, Bitocchi E, Rau D, Rodriguez M, Biagetti E, Giardini A, Attene G, Nanni L, Papa R (2014) Genomics of origin, domestication and evolution of Phaseolus vulgaris. In: Tuberosa R, Graner A, Frison E (eds) Genomics of plant genetic resources. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 483–507.
Bhering LL (2017) Rbio: a tool for biometric and statistical analysis using the R platform. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology 17:187–190
Briñez B, Perseguini JMKC, Rosa JS, Bassi D, Gonçalves JGR, Almeida C, Paulino JFC, Blair MW, Chioratto AF, Carbonell SAM, Valdisser PAMR, Vianello RP, Benchimol-Reis LL (2017) Mapping QTLs for drought tolerance in a SEA 5 x AND 277 common bean cross with SSRs and SNP markers. Genetics and Molecular Biology 40:813–823
Broughton WJ, Hernández G, Blair M, Beebe SE, Gepts P, Vanderleyden J (2003) Beans (Phaseolus spp.) - model food legumes. Plant and Soil 252:55–128
Campa A, Murube E, Ferreira JJ (2018) Genetic diversity, population structure, and linkage disequilibrium in a Spanish common bean diversity panel revealed through genotyping-by-sequencing. Genes 9:518–518
Carvalho GA, Paula-Júnior TJ, Alzate-Marin AL, Nietsche S, Barros EG, Moreira MA (1998) Herança da resistência da linhagem AND-277 de feijoeiro-comum à raça 63-23 de Phaeoisariopsis griseola e identificação de marcador RAPD ligado ao gene de resistência. Fitopatologia Brasileira 23:482–485
Chataika BYE, Bokosi JM, Kwapata MB, Chirwa RM, Mwale VM, Mnyenyembe P, Myers JR (2010) Performance of parental genotypes and inheritance of Angular Leaf Spot (Phaeosariopsis griseola) resistance in the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). African Journal of Biotechnology 9:4398–4406
Chiorato AF, Carbonell SAM (2014) O Melhoramento Genético do Feijoeiro no Instituto Agronômico IAC (1932 a 2014) O Agronômico (Campinas) 64/66:6-13
CIMMYT (2005) Laboratory protocols: CIMMYT applied molecular genetics laboratory. 3rd edition. CIMMYT, Mexico City, 102 p
Colombari Filho JM, Geraldi IO, Barona MAA (2010) Heterose e distâncias genéticas moleculares para a produção de grãos em soja. Ciência e Agrotecnol 34:940–945
CONAB - Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento (2019) Acompanhamento da safra brasileira de grãos: Safra 2018/19 - Décimo segundo levantamento. https://www.conab.gov.br/info-agro/safras/graos/boletim-da-safra-de-graos/. Accessed on june, 2020
Cooper HD, Spillane C, Hodgkin T (2001) Broadening the genetic base of crops: an overview. In: Cooper HD, Spil-lane C, Hodgkin T (eds) Broadening the genetic base of crop production. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 1–23
Corrêa RX, Good-God PIV, Oliveira MLP, Nietsche S, Moreira MA, Barros EG (2001) Herança da resistência à mancha-angular do feijoeiro e identificação de marcadores moleculares flanqueando o loco de resistência. Fitopatologia Brasileira 26:27–32
Correa-Victoria FJ, Pastor-Corrales MA, Saettler AW (1989) Angular leaf spot. In: Schwartz HF, Pastor-Corrales MA (eds) Bean production problems in the tropics. CIAT, Cali, pp 59–75
Crous PW, Liebenberg MM, Braun U, Johannes Z, Groenewald JZ (2006) Re-evaluating the taxonomic status of Phaeoisariopsis griseola, the causal agent of angular leaf spot of bean. Studies in Mycology 55:163–173
da Silva LC, de Souza TLPO, Cruz CD, Carneiro PCS, Silva FF, de Barros EG, de Souza Carneiro JE (2018) Linkage fine-mapping and QTLs affecting morpho-agronomic traits of a Mesoamerican × Andean RIL common bean population. Euphytica 214:221
Delfini J, Moda-Cirino V, Ruas CF, dos Santos NJ, Ruas PM, Buratto JS (2017) Distinctness of Brazilian common bean cultivars with carioca and black grain by means of morphoagronomic and molecular descriptors. PLoS ONE 12:e0188798
Dray S, Dufour A, Chessel D (2007) The ade4 package - II: two-table and K-table methods. R News 7:47–52
Earl DA, Vonholdt BM (2012) STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conservation Genetics Resources 4:359–361
Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Molecular Ecology 14:2611–2620
Ferreira E, Cavalcanti P, Nogueira D (2014) ExpDes: a R package for ANOVA and experimentais designs. Applications of Mathematics 5:2952–2958
Francis RM (2017) POPHELPER: an R package and web app to analyze and visualize population structure. Molecular Ecology Resources 17:27–32
Gioia T, Logozzo G, Marzario S, Spagnoletti Zeuli P, Gepts P (2019) Evolution of SSR diversity from wild types to U.S. advanced cultivars in the Andean and Mesoamerican domestications of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). PLoS ONE 14:e0211342
Gonçalves-Vidigal MC, Cruz AS, Garcia A, Kami J, Vidigal Filho PS, Sousa L, Mc Clean P, Gepts P, Pastor-Corrales MA (2011) Linkage mapping of the Phg-1 and Co-14 genes for resistance to angular leaf spot and anthracnose in the common bean cultivar AND 277. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 122:893–903
Gonçalves-Vidigal MC, Cruz AS, Lacanallo GF, Vidigal Filho PS, Sousa LL, Pacheco CM, Pastor-Corrales MA (2013) Co-segregation analysis and mapping of the anthracnose Co-10 and angular leaf spot Phg-ON disease-resistance genes in the common bean cultivar Ouro Negro. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 126:2245–2255
Guzmán P, Gilbertson R, Nodari R, Jonhson WC, Temple SR, Mandala D, Mkandawire ABC, Gepts P (1995) Characterization of variability in the fungus Phaeoisariopsis griseola suggests coevolution with the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Phytopathology 85:600–607
Hefni M, Ohrvik V, Mohamed T, Witthoft C (2010) Folate content in foods commonly consumed in Egypt. Food Chemistry 121:540–545
Jesus-Junior WC, Vale FX, Coelho RH, Hau B, Zambolim L, Costa LC, Filho AB (2001) Effects of angular leaf spot and rust on yield loss of Phaseolus vulgaris. Phytopathology 91:1045–1053
Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC (2007) Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Molecular Ecology 16:1099–1106
Kamvar ZN, Brooks JC, Grünwald NJ (2015) Novel R tools for analysis of genome-wide population genetic data with emphasis on clonality. Frontiers in Genetics 6:208
Knapp SJ, Stoup WW, Ross WM (1985) Exact confidence intervals for heritability on a progeny mean basis. Crop Science 25:192–194
Keller B, Manzanares C, Jara C, Lobaton JD, Studer B, Raatz B (2015) Fine-mapping of a major QTL controlling angular leaf spot resistance in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 128:813–826
Liebenberg MM, Pretorius ZA (1997) A review of angular leaf spot of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L). African Plant Protection 3:81–10
Mahuku GS, Antonia Henriquez M, Montoya C, Jara C, Teran H, Beebe S (2011) Inheritance and development of molecular markers linked to angular leaf spot resistance genes in the common bean accession G10909. Molecular Breeding 28:57–71
Mendonça HA, dos Santos JB, Ramalho MAP (2003) Genetic control of common bean reaction to angular leaf spot. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology 68:661–664
Miklas PN, Kelly JD, Beebe SE, Blair MW (2006) Common bean breeding for resistance against biotic and abiotic stresses: from classical to MAS breeding. Euphytica 147:105–131
Miller T, Gepts P, Kimno S, Arunga E, Chilagane LA, Nchimbi-Msolla S, Namusoke A, Namayanja A, Tedla YR (2018) Alternative markers linked to the Phg-2 angular leaf spot resistance locus in common bean using the Phaseolus genes marker database. African Journal of Biotechnology 17:818–828
Nay MM, Souza TLPO, Raatz B, Mukankusi CM, Gonçalves-Vidigal MC, Abreu AFB, Melo LC, Pastor-Corrales MA (2019a) A review of angular leaf spot resistance in common bean. Crop Science 59:1376–1391
Nay MM, Mukankusi CM, Studer B, Raatz B (2019b) Haplotypes at the Phg-2 Locus are determining pathotype-specificity of angular leaf spot resistance in common bean. Frontiers in Plant Science 10:1126–1126
Nei M (1978) Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89:583–590
Oblessuc PR, Baroni RM, Garcia AAF, Chioratto AF, Carbonell SAM, Camargo LEA, Benchimol-Reis LL (2012) Mapping of angular leaf spot resistance QTL in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under different environments. BMC Genetics 13:50
Oblessuc PR, Perseguini JMKC, Baroni RM, Chiorato AF, Carbonel SAM, Mondengo JMC, Vidal RO, Camargo LEA, Benchimol-Reis LL (2013) Increasing the density of markers around a major QTL controlling resistance to angular leaf spot in common bean. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 26:2451–2465
Pastor-Corrales MA, Jara C, Singh SP (1998) Pathogenic variation in, sources of, and breeding for resistance to Phaeoisariopsis griseola causing angular leaf spot in common bean. Euphytica 103:161–171
Pastor-Corrales MA, Jara C (1995) La evolución de Phaeoisariopsis griseola com el frijol comum en America Latina. Fitopatología Colombiana 19:15–24
Peakall R, Smouse PE (2012) GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research - an update. Bioinformatics 28:2537–2539
Pereira HS, Mota APS, Rodrigues LA, de Souza TLPO, Melo LC (2019a) Genetic diversity among common bean cultivars based on agronomic traits and molecular markers and application to recommendation of parent lines. Euphytica 215:38
Pereira R, Abreu ABF, Nalin RS, Souza EA (2019b) Phenotyping for angular leaf spot severity and its implication in breeding common bean for resistance. Science in Agriculture 76:415–423
Perseguini JMKC, Chioratto AF, Zucchi MI, Colombo CA, Carbonell SAM, Mondego JMC, Gazaffi R, Garcia AAF, Campos T, Souza AP (2011) Genetic diversity in cultivated carioca common beans based on molecular marker analysis. Genetics and Molecular Biology 34:88–102
Perseguini JMKC, Oblessuc PR, Rosa JRBF, Gomes KA, Chiorato AF, Carbonell SAM (2016) Genome-wide association studies of anthracnose and angular leaf spot resistance in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). PLoS ONE 11:e0150506
Perseguini JMKC, Silva GMB, Rosa JRBF, Gazaffi R, Marçal FJ, Carbonell SAM, Chiorato AF, Zucchi MI, Garcia AAF, Benchimol-Reis LL (2015) Developing a common bean core collection suitable for association mapping studies. Genetics and Molecular Biology 38:67–78
Pritchard J, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959
Raatz B, Mukankusi C, Lobaton JD, Male A, Chisale V, Amsalu B, Fourie D, Mukamuhirwa F, Muimui K, Mutari B, Nchimbi-Msolla S, Nkalubo S, Tumsa K, Chirwa R, Maredia KM, He C (2019) Analyses of African common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) germplasm using a SNP fingerprinting platform: diversity, quality control and molecular breeding. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 66:707–722
Rava SCA, Sartorato A, Porto de Carvalho JR (1985) Yield losses in dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) caused by angular leaf spot (Isariopsis griseola Sacc.). Annual Report Bean Improvement Cooperative 28:5–6
Reis-Prado FG, Sartorato A, Costa JGC, Rava CA, Sibov ST, Pinheiro JB, Carneiro MS (2006) Reação de cultivares de feijoeiro comum à mancha angular em casa de vegetação. Fitopatologia Brasileira 31:306–309
Sanglard DA, Mafra VS, Ribeiro CAG, Silva LC, Barros EG, Moreira MA, Carneiro JES, Mota APS, Vianello RP, Souza TLPO (2013) Rudá x AND 277 RILs: a potential new core mapping population for common bean. Annual Report Bean Improvement Cooperative 56:23–24
Sannazzaro AM, Wutke EB, Oliveira SHF, Castro JL, Gallo PB, Martins ALM, Bortoleto N, Sabino JC, Kanthack RAD, Ishimura I, Silveira LCP, Dornelles CR, Pereira JCVNA, Sakai M, Saes LA, Bacchi GS (2003) Severidade da mancha angular (Phaeiosariopsis griseola) em cultivares de feijoeiro no estado de São Paulo. Unidade de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento de Sorocaba 70:315–321
Sartorato A, Nietsche S, Barros E, Moreira MA, Sartorato A, Nietsche S, Moreira MA (2000) RAPD and SCAR markers linked for resistance gene to angular leaf spot in common beans. Fitopatologia Brasileira 25:637–642
Sartorato A (2004) Pathogenic variability and genetic diversity of Phaeoisariopsis griseola isolates from two counties in the state of Goias, Brazil. Journal of Phytopathology 152:385–390
Schmutz J, McClean PE, Mamidi S, Wu GA, Cannon SB, Grimwood J, Jenkins J, Shu S, Song Q, Chavarro C, Torres-Torres M, Geffroy V, Moghaddam SM, Gao D, Abernathy B, Barry K, Blair M, Brick MA, Chovatia M, Gepts P, Goodstein DM, Gonzales M, Hellsten U, Hyten DL, Jia G, Kelly JD, Kudrna D, Lee R, Richard MMS, Miklas PN, Osorno JM, Rodrigues J, Thareau V, Urrea CA, Wang M, Yu Y, Zhang M, Wing RA, Cregan PB, Rokhsar DS, Jackson SA (2014) A reference genome for common bean and genomewide analysis of dual domestications. Nat Genet 46:707–713.
Schwartz HF, Correa F, Pineda P, Otoya MM, Katherman MJ (1981) Dry bean yield losses caused by Ascochyta, angular, and white leaf spots in Colombia. Plant Disease 65:494–496
Schwartz HF, Pastor-Corrales MA (1989) Bean production problems in the tropics. CIAT, Cali
Schwartz HF, Steadman JR, Hall R, Forster RL (2005) Compendium of bean diseases, 2nd edn. APS Press, St. Paul
Scott AJ, Knott M (1974) A cluster analysis method for grouping means in the analysis of variance. Biometrics 30:507–512
Shapiro SS, Wilk MB (1965) An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52:591–611
Singh SP, Schwartz HF (2010) Breeding common bean for resistance to diseases: a review. Crop Science 50:2199–2223
Souza TLPO, Gonçalves-Vidigal MC, Raatz B, Mukankusi CM, Abreu ÂFB, Melo LC, Pastor-Corrales MA (2016) Major loci controlling resistance to the angular leaf spot of common bean. Annual Report Bean Improvement Cooperative 59: 15–18
Stenglein S, Ploper LD, Vizgarra O, Balleti P (2003) Angular leaf spot: a disease caused by the fungus Phaeoisariopsis griseola (Sacc.) Ferraris on Phaseolus vulgaris L. Advances in Applied Microbiology 52:209–243
Tryphone GM, Chilagane LA, Nchimbi-msolla S (2016) Genetic characterization of angular leaf spot resistance in selected common bean landraces from Tanzania. African Journal of Biotechnology 8:14–56
Valentini G, Gonçalves-Vidigal MC, Elias JCF, Moiana LD, Mindo NNA (2018) Population structure and genetic diversity of common bean accessions from Brazil. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 36:897–906
Van-Schoonhoven A, Pastor-Corrales MA (1991) Sistema estándar para La evaluación de germoplasma de Frijol. CIAT, Cali, pp 20–46
Wagara IN, Mwang’ombe AW, Kimenju JW, Buruchara RA, Jamnadass R, Majiwa PAO (2004) Genetic diversity of Phaeoisariopsis griseola in Kenya as revealed by AFLP and group-specific primers. Journal of Phytopathology 152:235–224
Acknowledgments
We are very thankful to Dr. Elaine Aparecida de Souza from the Genetics and Plant Breeding Department (UFLA, MG, Brazil) who gently provided the P. griseola isolate for the development of this study.
Funding
We are grateful to the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) for granting funding for the research project (FAPESP Number 2014/11145-2) and scholarships (FAPESP Numbers 2017/01753-3, 2014/19967-1), which enabled this study to be carried out.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
C.P.A.; N.A.; J.F.C.P.; G.F.J.B.; and B.C.D. conducted the experiments. C.P.A and M.M.B. analyzed the data. C.P.A. wrote the draft. G.M.F. conducted the manuscript edition. F.R.A.P; A.F.C.; S.A.M.; and L.L.B-R supported data curation and conducted review of the manuscript. L.L.B-R idealized the study and was responsible for the project’s funding. All the authors read and approved the final version.
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(XLSX 30 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Almeida, C.P., Arruda, N., de Carvalho Paulino, J.F. et al. Genetic diversity of Pseudocercospora griseola resistance loci in common beans. Trop. plant pathol. 46, 129–138 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40858-020-00395-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40858-020-00395-0