Abstract
Intra-articular fractures of the base of the first metacarpal (Bennet fractures) are prone to dislocation and require surgical reduction and fixation to prevent secondary degenerative joint disease and chronic dysfunction. Therefore, a prompt diagnosis is necessary, mostly achieved by conventional roentgenograms. We report the case of a 62-year-old man in whom a Bennet fracture was highly suspected on ultrasound (US) examination realized after a fall. Standard radiographs, obtained after US to confirm the diagnosis, were interpreted as normal. A computed tomography was then performed showing a typical Bennet fracture. This case report demonstrates that a careful assessment of bones must be an integral part of any routine musculo-skeletal US examination, particularly in post-traumatic patients. US can detect bone fractures where radiograph is not discriminating.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
First metacarpal bone fractures are quite common, accounting for 4% of all adult hand fractures [1]. Intra-articular fractures are often unstable owing to associated lesions of the ligaments stabilizing the first carpo-metacarpal joint (1st CMCJ) as well as the deforming action of local muscles (Figs. 1 and 2). Unstable fractures require surgical management, in contrast to extra-articular fractures, which are mainly treated conservatively [2].
Intra-articular fractures of the base of the first metacarpal, “passing obliquely across the base of the bone and detaching the greater part of the articular surface”, with a single beak fragment [3] and additional further comminuted variants with multiple fragments are known as Bennet fractures (BF). They represent around 30% of first metacarpal fractures [4].
The first-line diagnostic method to confirm a clinically suspected BF is a standard radiography. Nevertheless, up to 70% of all carpometacarpal fractures are underdiagnosed because of superposition of adjacent bones or incorrect radiographic projections.
We present the case of a post-traumatic patient where ultrasound (US) strongly suggested a BF, not confirmed by radiographs but subsequently proved by a computed tomography (CT).
Case report
A 62-year-old man was referred for US evaluation of his left thumb due to acute pain following a bicycle fall. Physical examination revealed local pain and tenderness over the thenar eminence with palpable skin tension. The overlying skin was continuous with subcutaneous swelling, there was no evidence of hematoma. Neurological and vascular examination were normal. Range of motion of the thumb was painful and limited.
US was obtained to rule out soft tissue trauma. The examination was performed by transverse and longitudinal conventional images on the 1st CMCJ and thenar eminence followed by color Doppler assessment. A commercially available equipment (Affinity 50, Philips Healthcare, Best, Netherlands) equipped with a linear electronic multi-frequency transducer (L 18-5 broadband array) was used by a 40- years experimented musculoskeletal radiologist.
US images over the palmar aspect of the 1st CMCJ on the most tender area (Fig. 3), showed a focal interruption of the first metacarpal base hyperechoic cortical line with the presence of a local bone fragment, a joint effusion and a hypervascularized synovial hypertrophy (Fig. 4). No ligaments/tendons/muscles and nerves lesions were observed.
Based on the US and clinical appearance a BF was diagnosed and a X-ray was requested for further confirmation. Antero-posterior and lateral radiographs of the 1st CMCJ, carried out three days later, were interpreted as negative for fracture (Fig. 5). The discrepancy between US and radiographs, warranted a CT verification that was exhaustive for a classical BF, identifying two intra-articular comminuted bone fragments (Fig. 6).
The fracture was treated by open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), (Fig. 7) with a good clinical outcome.
Discussion
Fractures of the first metacarpal bone are essentially observed in athletes and in young males.
A clear comprehension of 1st CMCJ anatomy and function is necessary to explain the consequences of traumatic injuries. Physiologically 1st CMCJ stability is sacrificed to allow large thumb movements, determinants for hand prehension and above all for opposition. Sixteen ligaments are involved to supplement 1st CMCJ stability [5,6,7], but the principal stabilizers are the anterior oblique ligament (AOL) and mostly the dorsal radial ligament (DRL). The DRL originates from the trapezium tubercle and inserts at the base of the first metacarpal on its radial side, sometimes adjacent to the insertion of the abductor pollicis longus (APL) tendon. It serves as a pivot point in 1st CMCJ stability during power pinch and power grasp and in the terminal phase of opposition known as the "screw home torque" mechanism [8].
In BF, the mechanism of injury is an axial load over a flexed thumb causing a metacarpal base fracture. A secondary DRL complete or partial tear produces joint instability and dislocation even if the AOL is continuous [8]. The tendons of the muscles inserting on metacarpal and proximal/distal phalanx i.e., the adductor pollicis (AP), the abductor pollicis longus (APL) and the extensor pollicis longus (EPL) act as a deforming forces that displaces the fragments after the injury [8]. Usually, the metacarpal bone tends to dislocate radially and dorsally, while the smaller fragment connected to the trapezium by the AOL, remains in his place.
The most frequent BF does not include a complete DRL rupture: in this case a close reduction is possible only in fresh BF (less than 5 days); after 5 days soft tissue healing may interfere with a close reduction, so an open approach is preferred. On the contrary, BF with a complete DRL break,often requires an open surgical reduction [8].
Early detection of BF is essential since if left untreated it can lead to osteoarthritis causing pain, deformity, grip and pinch strength reduction and thumb multiplanar movements limitation [2].
Symptoms and clinical signs of BF are not specific, and a definitive diagnosis is mostly obtained by a well-performed standard radiograph, occasionally with additional projections.
Until recently, due to its intrinsic properties, US was usually adopted in musculoskeletal trauma to assess soft tissue injuries only if a fracture was not considered. Although US does not represent the first imaging modality for bone, many works have extensively described the excellent US performances in bone trauma [9,10,11,12,13]. Several studies have found no difference in accuracy between US compared with conventional radiography in the detection of some bone fractures [9]. On the contrary in an emergency setting, other authors have shown different results: bedside ultrasound respectively is [10] and is not [14] a reliable method for diagnosing fractures of the upper and lower limb extremities compared with radiography. These conflicting results may be linked to the age of the patients and the different anatomical regions evaluated.
Beltrame et al. [15] in a study of 86 patients, comparing US versus radiography after a trauma, concluded that US bone assessment is comparable to radiography only when joints are not involved in the injury. In this case, one US limitation, might be the inability to scan the entire bone contour due to patient pain, limiting joint excursion.
Hand fractures can seldom be difficult to identify for their complex anatomy and US use is to some extent controversial [16,17,18]. However, several articles described a reliable US employ for scaphoid, hamate, and sesamoid fractures [12, 19] as well as metacarpal bones lesions (20). A suitable sonographer training is mandatory to recognize those complicated patterns and may explain the above-mentioned contrasting conclusions. In addition, specific sonograms targeted to evaluation of bones, must be required after “standard US scans” to rule out fractures.
To the best of our knowledge this is the first report of BF diagnosed by US examination. PubMed research using the key words “Bennet fracture”, “Ultrasound”, “Diagnosis”, “Trauma” was made, and we found no other US descriptions of BF.
An early diagnosis conditions the BF surgical treatment: in our description, the delay in diagnosis constrained the orthopedic surgeon to perform an open surgery even though, as we comment above, the articular ligaments, in particular the DRL was intact.
This case report highlights the importance of performing a complete US examination in musculoskeletal trauma, including bone cortex, to find fractures with a poor outcome if left untreated, as in our case. Given the interaction between patient and examiner, US allows a more focalized assessment based on signs and symptoms reported, also adopting additional nonstandard scanning planes.
Conclusions
US is nowadays frequently requested in extremity trauma when a fracture is not suspected. It is important to stress that sonologists must always evaluate cortical bone in every examination.
Conventional radiography still represents the gold standard technique for post-traumatic hand bone fractures. US will not replace radiograph, but it accounts for a complementary method to triage patients for X-ray or as a negative predictive confirmation exam.
References
Stanton JS, Dias JJ, Burke FD (2007) Fractures of the tubular bones of the hand. J Hand Surg Eur 32:626–636
Nagaoka M, Nagao S, Matsuzaki H (2005) Trapeziometacarpal joint instability after Bennett’s fracture-dislocation. J Orthop Sci 10(4):374–377
Bennett EH (1882) Fractures of the metacarpal bones. Dublin J Med Sci 73:72–75
Hove LM (1993) Fractures of the hand. Distribution and relative incidence. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 27:317–319
Bettinger PC et al (1999) An anatomic study of the stabilizing ligaments of the trapezium and trapeziometacarpal joint. J Hand Surg Am 24:786–798
Strauch RJ et al (1994) Acute dislocation of the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb: an anatomic and cadaver study. J Hand Surg Am 19:93–98
Van Brenk B et al (1998) A biomechanical assessment of ligaments preventing dorsoradial subluxation of the trapeziometacarpal joint. J Hand Surg Am 23:607–611
Edmunds JO (2006) Traumatic dislocations and instability of the trapeziometacarpal joint of the thumb. Hand Clin 22(3):365–392
Døssing K, Mechlenburg I, Hansen LB, Søballe K, Østergaard H (2017) The use of ultrasound to exclude extremity fractures in adults. JBJS Open Access 2:e0007
Barata I, Spencer R, Suppiah A, Raio C, Ward MF, Sama A (2012) Emergency ultrasound in the detection of pediatric long-bone fractures. Pediatr Emerg Care 28(11):1154–1157
Bianchi S (2020) Ultrasound bone: a pictorial review. J Ultrasound 23:227–257
Botchu R, Bianchi S (2014) Sonography of trapezial ridge fractures. J Clin Ultrasound 42(4):241–244
Botchu R, Jae Lee K, Bianchi S (2012) Radiographically undetected coracoid fractures diagnosed by sonography. Report of seven cases. Skelet Radiol 41:693–698
Bolandparvaz S, Moharamzadeh P, Jamali K, Pouraghaei M, Fadaie M, Sefidbakht S, Shahsavari K (2013) Comparing diagnostic accuracy of bedside ultrasound and radiography for bone fracture screening in multiple trauma patients at the ED. Am J Emerg Med 31:1583–1585
Beltrame V, Stramare R, Rebellato N, Angelini F, Frigo AC, Rubaltelli L (2012) Sonographic evaluation of bone fractures: a reliable alternative in clinical practice? Clin Imaging. 36(3):203–208
Munk B, Bolvig L, Krøner K, Christiansen T, Borris L, Boe S (2000) Ultrasound for diagnosis of scaphoid fractures. J Hand Surg Br 25(4):369–371
Christiansen TG, Rude C, Lauridsen KK, Christensen OM (1991) Diagnostic value of ultrasound in scaphoid fractures. Injury 22(5):397–399
Carpenter CR, Pines JM, Schuur JD, Muir M, Calfee RP, Raja AS (2014) Adult scaphoid fracture. Acad Emerg Med 21(2):101–121
Celi J, de Gautard G, Della Santa JD, Bianchi S (2008) Sonographic diagnosis of a radiographically undiagnosed hook of the hamate fracture. J Utrasound Med 27(8):1235–1239
Kocaoğlu S, Özhasenekler A, İçme F, PamukçuGünaydın G, Şener A, Gökhan Ş (2016) The role of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of metacarpal fractures. Am J Emerg Med. 34(9):1868–1871
Funding
Financial and non-financial interests: not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent to publish
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Calvisi, S.L., Olarte, D., Meloni, M. et al. Sonographic diagnosis of radiographically undetectable bennet fracture. J Ultrasound (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-024-00901-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-024-00901-z