Introduction

Lymphedema is the painless progressive accumulation of protein-rich fluid in the interstitial spaces of the skin, resulting from an anatomic or functional obstruction of the lymphatic system [1, 2]. It is a chronic disease of the lymphatic system which can cause severe incapacitating swelling of the extremities [2, 3]. Lymphedema is most common in the lower limb, about 80% of cases, but can also occur in the arms, face, trunk, and external genitalia.

Pathology and clinical presentation

The primary pathology leading to lymphedema is dysfunction of the lymphatic transportation system [4]. Disruption of the lymphatic systems by pathological processes such as trauma, surgery and radiotherapy, infection, and congenital abnormalities can lead to lymphedema [5]. The disorder typically affects the dermis and spares the deeper compartments. The dermis has abundant lymphatic capillaries, forming superficial and deep plexuses [6,7,8].

Primary lymphedema is usually as a result of congenital abnormalities in the lymphatic system which can be either aplasia or hypoplasia [9, 10]. There are two main forms of primary lymphedema: lymphedema praecox (early onset, usually unilateral and before 35 years of age) and lymphedema tarda (late onset). Milroy disease is the autosomal dominant form of primary lymphedema with a very early age of onset. It is due to agenesis of the lymphatic system and is typically bilateral [11]. Valvular incompetence is a very rare cause of primary lymphedema [12].

Secondary lymphedema occurs as a result of obstruction or interruption of the normal lymphatic channels secondary to surgery and/or radiotherapy, trauma, or infection. In sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia, filariasis is the most common cause of secondary lymphedema [13].

Lymphedema staging

Stage 1 is reversible lymphedema, with pitting edema and swelling that decreases when the limb is elevated, and stage 2 is non-pitting edema that does not decrease when the limb is elevated. Stage 3 is lymphostatic elephantiasis, with grossly swollen limb and hardened skin [14].

Clinical manifestations include persistent edema of > 3 months duration, minimal response to overnight elevation or diuretics, and the presence of skin changes such as thickened skin, hyperkeratosis and papillomatosis indicating early elephantiasis.

Lymphoscintigraphy technique and image interpretation

Lymphoscintigraphy is now one of the primary imaging modalities used in determining a diagnosis in patients with suspected extremity lymphedema [9, 10, 15], as it has been proved to be reliable and reproducible. The study is noninvasive with no known adverse effects [1, 16]. Careful attention to technical performance and image evaluation is essential to maximize the clinical utility of the investigation [5]. The radiation dose received during the examination is low (effective dose of 0.04–0.08 mSv after an injection of 20–40 MBq of 99mTc nanocolloid) and the study can be repeated after therapy [1].

The current protocol in Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH) utilizes 20–40 MBq 99mTc-nanocolloid, injected intradermally at the first interdigital space of both limbs, regardless of whether edema is unilateral or bilateral, with static image acquisition at 5, 15 min and 1.5 h intervals. 99mTc-nanocolloid has an optimal particle size and neutral pH, which following intradermal injection allows better and faster visualization of the superficial compartment lymphatic pathways and does not cause a burning sensation [2, 7]. Other radiotracers which can be used include macromolecules such as Dextran-99mTc, which is less optimal for lymph node imaging. On the other hand, other colloids such as 99mTc-(human serum albumin) HSA microcolloid and 99mTc-sulfur colloid have larger particle size which results in slower transit. Field of view is up to the lower abdomen for the 15 min and 1.5 h images. The liver and spleen are included in the field of view in the 15 min image to detect any intravasation. The patients walk for 5 min before the 15 min image. Two minutes of muscular exercise has been shown to counteract the increased gradient pressure of the lymphatic system, accelerating lymph drainage [7].

In patients with normal lymphatic anatomy and function, a predictable sequence is seen on lymphoscintigraphy. Symmetric migration of the radionuclide is seen through discrete lymph vessels (three to five lymph vessels per calf and one to two per thigh) [1, 13] (Figs. 1, 2). Bilateral visualization of ilioinguinal lymph nodes occurs within 1 h [2].

Fig. 1
figure 1

43-Year-old female. Bilateral lower limb swelling for more than 10 years. Normal passage of tracer was demonstrated. Some tracer in the bladder is noted present small amount of unbound Tc99m. Some crossover lymphatics also thought to exist with communication of the left and right ilioinguinal nodal groups

Fig. 2
figure 2

40-Year-old female. Bilateral lower limb swelling for 7 years. 3 channels are demonstrated below the knee on the right at the 5 min image. There was, however, no tracer holdup and the appearance was fairly symmetrical in the subsequent images

On lymphoscintigrams with abnormal findings, a variety of findings can be identified including interruption of lymphatic flow, collateral lymph vessels, progressive dermal and flow, delayed flow, delayed visualization or non-visualization of lymph nodes, a reduced number of lymph nodes, dilated lymphatics and in severe cases non-visualization of the lymphatic system at all [1] (Figs. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8). Dermal backflow, also referred to as dermal flow or dermal forward-flow, reflects the increased numbers of abnormally dilated lymphatic capillaries. Visualization of popliteal nodes in the setting of lymphedema occurs as a result of recruitment of the deep lymphatics due to insufficiency of the superficial lymphatics. Interruption of the lymphatic channels with or without formation of lymphocoele implies a direct trauma to the lymphatic channels. Purely qualitative analysis has been reported to be very accurate for confirming or excluding the diagnosis of lymphedema, with a sensitivity as high as 92% and a specificity as high as 100% [4].

Fig. 3
figure 3

14-Year-old female with an 8-month history of left lower limb swelling; noted history of treatment for a parasitic infection with improvement, but persistent swelling. Tracer migration to the left inguinal lymph nodes was clearly reduced and delayed in this patient. Visualization of a popliteal lymph node in the later images implies recruitment of drainage through the deep lymphatics due to impaired drainage through the superficial system

Fig. 4
figure 4

23-Year-old female with a 9-year history of right lower limb swelling. This is a case of primary lymphedema due to aplasia of the lymphatic channels on the right. Dermal backflow is demonstrated in the grossly swollen right lower limb at the region of the ankle

Fig. 5
figure 5

36-Year-old male with a 6-week history of right lower limb swelling. This is a case of late onset unilateral right-sided primary lymphedema (lymphedema tarda). No lymphatic channels visualized on the right in keeping with aplasia. The minimal tracer is seen in a right inguinal lymph node which likely represents crossover from the left inguinal nodes

Fig. 6
figure 6

26-Year-old with painless bilateral lower limb swelling for seven years. No history of trauma. Bilateral lymphedema secondary to hypoplasia of the lymphatic channels

Fig. 7
figure 7

44-Year-old female with long-standing right-sided limb swelling with recurrent attacks of cellulitis. Marked tracer pulling is noted in the right leg which is consistent with a lymphocele. There was also dermal backflow and collateral channels related to the lymphocele

Fig. 8
figure 8

25-Year-old female with bilateral lower limb swelling for several years, left worse than right. There was delayed migration of tracer along the lymphatics, with bilateral dermal backflow and left-sided collateral formation and communication with deep lymphatics

Between August 2014 and July 2015, a total of 55 lymphoscintigraphy examinations were performed in the part of evaluation of patients with long-standing lower limb swelling in the absence of other known causes of lower limb swelling (Tables 1, 2, 3). Three examinations were excluded from review: one due to lack of 1.5 h imaging and two due to inadequate field of view. We present some of the imaging appearances including a suggested model of quantitative assessment. All procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments.

Table 1 Demographic characteristics of the subjects
Table 2 Clinical presentation
Table 3 Distribution of lymphedema by gender

Quantitative and semi-quantitative analysis parameters can be used complementary to visual analysis, to better characterize discrete changes or for monitoring therapeutic assessment in sequential studies [17]. One of the easier and reproducible quantitative parameters is estimating the amount of tracer at the ilioinguinal nodes at a specified time point (Fig. 9).

Fig. 9
figure 9

Computation of ilioinguinal lymph nodes uptake as a quantitative index in lymphedema diagnosis. Region of interest was drawn at the injection site and the inguinal nodes at the 1½ hour images and percentage of the amount of tracer in the ilioinguinal nodes computed. This is correlated well with the findings from the visual analysis

Kramer et al. observed that recognition of milder degrees of lymphatic abnormality is highly dependent on the standardization of technique and on quantitative analysis [18].

Conclusion

Because many institutions are establishing lymphedema centers, lymphatic imaging will become more prevalent. As this occurs, it will be important to develop standardized procedures and radiopharmaceuticals to perform these examinations and standardized criteria to interpret the results. This pictorial essay provides insight into the imaging appearances of normal and abnormal lymphoscintigrams.