1 Introduction

Based on the advantages of metal matrix composites [1, 2] and high-entropy alloys (HEAs) [3,4,5,6], the high-entropy alloy matrix composites (HEAMCs) are expected to exceed the performance limits of traditional metal composites by adding reinforcement particles to HEAs [7,8,9,10,11]. In addition, the reinforcements particles added will directly affect the performance of the composites. Due to the low cost, high hardness and elastic modulus, ceramic particle is usually added to the HEAs to improve strength and wear resistance of alloys, such as TiC [12], WC [13], SiC [9], NbC [10]. Whereas, the ceramic particles further improve the strength and wear resistance of alloys at the expense of plasticity for the low ductility, and it is difficult to achieve the comprehensive performance enhancement of the alloys [14]. Zheng et al. [15] introduced Ni3Al particles into CoCrFeNi HEA to prepare CoCrFeNi(Ni3Al)x EHEA matrix composites. The results exhibited that the addition of the Ni3Al obviously enhance the mechanical properties. Wherein the CoCrFeNi(Ni3Al)10 alloy has excellent comprehensive mechanical properties with yield strength of 910 MPa, fracture strength of 1200 MPa and elongation of 14%, respectively. Compared with conventional ceramic particles, the Ni3Al with L12 structure as a metal particle reinforcement has some unique advantages. For example, Ni3Al has both metallic plasticity/toughness and ceramic strength/hardness due to the presence of both metallic and covalent bonds, and exhibits good toughness; Ni3Al has good chemical compatibility and wettability with the HEA matrix, and can form a good bonding interface; Ni–Al binary equilibrium phase diagram shows that the γ′-Ni3Al phase is fairly stable from room temperature to melting point temperature and does not undergo phase transformation.

Lu et al. [16] combined the concept of eutectic alloys and HEAs to proposed a new concept of eutectic high entropy alloys (EHEAs) and successfully designed and prepared the FCC(L12) + BCC(B2) two-phase AlCoCrFeNi2.1 EHEA, which exhibited a tensile fracture strength and elongation of 944 MPa and 25.6% at room temperature, respectively. With the continuous study of AlCoCrFeNi2.1 EHEA [17,18,19,20], it has been found that the stable structure and excellent comprehensive properties of the AlCoCrFeNi2.1 EHEA make it the most potential material for HEAMCs [21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. Moreover, multiple methods can be utilized for the fabrication of HEAMCs, including 3D printing [28, 29], atomic layer deposition [30], melt metallurgy method [31, 32], powder metallurgy [10]. Compared to other methods, the powder metallurgy technology makes powders uniform, and even form nanocrystals, which is conducive to the preparation of multi-component alloys with significant differences in element melting points, while avoiding component segregation caused by liquid solidification process.

Therefore, in this paper, Ni3Al metal particle was selected to add into AlCoCrFeNi2.1 EHEA to further improve the wear resistance as well as comprehensive mechanical properties. And the AlCoCrFeNi2.1-xNi3Al (x = 0, 5.0, 7.5 and 10 wt%) EHEA matrix composites were prepared by powder metallurgy. The influence of Ni3Al content on the microstructures, mechanical properties and wear properties of AlCoCrFeNi2.1-xNi3Al alloys were explored, and the wear mechanism of the alloys were elucidated, and the relationship between the particles content and properties was established.

2 Experimental

The high purity Al, Co, Cr, Fe, and Ni powders (more than 99.9 wt%, and an average particle size of 45 µm) were employed as the AlCoCrFeNi2.1 EHEA powder. The Ni3Al particles with the content of 0, 5.0, 7.5, 10 wt% (purity with 99.9 wt%, average particle size with 45 µm) were added into the AlCoCrFeNi2.1 powder. The powder was milled at 300 r/min for 50 h in 30 min intervals, and the ball to powder ratio was maintained at 10:1. The milled powders were subjected to spark plasma sintering furnace at 1100 °C for 15 min with an applied pressure of 50 MPa to obtain cylindrical blocks of 15 mm diameter and 11 mm height. The density of the composites was measured using the Archimedes drainage method. The phase structures were performed using X-ray diffractometer (Rigaku Ultima IV, Japan) with Cu target, voltage of 40 kV, scanning range from 20° to 100°, and scanning speed of 4°/min. The samples and wear surfaces morphology were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Carl Zeiss) with an energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS). The mechanical properties of composites were examined by compression tests (MTS E45.305) using a cylindrical sample with Φ5 × 10 mm at a strain rate of 1 × 10–3 s−1. The Vickers microhardness was measured with a Vickers hardness tester (MH-50) at a loading of 500 g and with a dwell time of 15 s. The dry wear tests were carried out on multifunctional friction and wear testing machine (Rtec MFT-5000, United States) with ball-on-disk dry sliding reciprocating friction at room temperature. The friction counterpart used Si3N4 ceramic ball with a size of 9.8 mm. The round trip distance, sliding speed, loads, and sliding time of tests were 5 mm, 1 Hz, 10 N, and 30 min, respectively. A three-dimensional morphometer (Contour GT-K1, Germany) was used to measure the worn volume and morphology of the tracks. The corresponding wear rates (mm3 N−1 m−1) were calculated by the equation: W = V/FL, where V is the worn volume (mm3), F is the normal load (N) and L is the sliding distance (m).

3 Results and Discussion

3.1 Microstructures of EHEA Matrix Composites

Figure 1 shows the XRD diffraction patterns of the AlCoCrFeNi2.1-xNi3Al EHEA matrix composites. As it can be seen, all composites are composed of both FCC/Ll2 and B2 phases, as well as a small amount of Al2O3 and Cr7C3. The L12 phase diffraction peak almost coincides with the FCC phase diffraction peak, and the calculated lattice constants are 0.3592 Å for FCC and 0.3572 Å for Ll2, respectively. The Ni3Al0 and Ni3Al5.0 composites have strong Ll2/FCC phase diffraction peaks, and weak B2 phase diffraction peaks. With a further increase in the Ni3Al content, the diffraction peak intensity of the B2 phase increase. When the content of Ni3Al reaches 10 wt%, the diffraction peak intensity of the hard B2 phase and the soft Ll2/FCC phase are almost identical, which indicates that the volume fraction of B2 phase is close to that of Ll2/FCC phase in the Ni3Al10 composite. This combination of phase volume fraction may be likely to balance the plasticity and strength of the Ni3Al10 alloy.

Fig. 1
figure 1

XRD diffraction patterns of the AlCoCrFeNi2.1-xNi3Al EHEA matrix composites

The densities of all composites were obtained by Archimedes method, and the calculated densities of AlCoCrFeNi2.1-xNi3Al (x = 0, 5.0, 7.5, 10 wt%) composites were 95%, 94%, 93.5%, 95%, respectively. Besides, no pores were found to be generated from the microscopic morphology, which indicates that the AlCoCrFeNi2.1-xNi3Al composites has a high dense microstructure.

The SEM images of the AlCoCrFeNi2.1-xNi3Al composites are shown in Fig. 2. It can be seen from Fig. 2a, c, e and g that all composites are composed of cellular grid morphologies surrounded by large gray phases (define as the A phase). The reason for the formation of this double-scale morphology is uneven powder temperature distribution during SPS. During the sintering process, the temperature on the surface of the AlCoCrFeNi2.1-xNi3Al EHEA matrix composites powders is higher, leading to the higher grain growth rate. And the grain size is easy to form micron level on the powders surface. While the internal temperature is lower and the grain growth rate is slow, thus forming relatively fine grains. With the increase of Ni3Al content, the volume fraction of A phase first increases and then decreases. In addition, as shown in Fig. 2b, d, f, g, the inner part of the cellular grid is consisted of four phases (define as B, C, D, and E phases). Wherein, B and C phases with a larger volume fraction are almost alternately distributed, and the nanoscale spherical D phase is diffusely distributed. The D phase is diffusely distributed on the boundary of A phase, and E phase is randomly distributed inside the cellular grid.

Fig. 2
figure 2

SEM images of the AlCoCrFeNi2.1-xNi3Al EHEA matrix composites: a and b x = 0; c and d x = 5.0; e and f x = 7.5; g and h x = 10

The distribution of elements in different regions of AlCoCrFeNi2.1-xNi3Al (x = 0, 5.0, 7.5, and 10) EHEA matrix composites are given by EDS, as listed in Table 1. To more vividly describe the elements distribution in cellular grid, the EDS mapping is shown in Fig. 3. It can be found that region A is enriched in Co, Cr, Fe and Ni elements, region B is enriched in Al and Ni elements, region C is enriched in Co, Cr, Fe, and Ni elements similar to region A, but the ratio of sum content of Co, Fe, and Ni elements to sum content of Al, Cr elements in region A is close to 3/1, which is the same as the Ni3Al structure [32]. Region D is enriched in Al and O elements, and region E is enriched in Cr and C elements. Combined with the XRD and EDS results, the Co, Cr, Fe and Ni-rich region A is a Ll2 phase, the Al, Ni-rich region B is a B2 phase, the Co, Cr, Fe and Ni-rich region C is FCC phase, the Al, O-rich region D is a Al2O3, and the rich Cr, C-rich region E is Cr7C3. Wherein, Cr7C3 and Al2O3 are produced as a result of carbon/oxygen contamination during ball milling and entrained oxygen between the graphite punch and die during sintering, and their formation also has been observed in many MA + SPS prepared alloy systems [10].

Table 1 Chemical compositions of different regions in the AlCoCrFeNi2.1-xNi3Al EHEA matrix composites (at.%)
Fig. 3
figure 3

EDS elemental mapping of the AlCoCrFeN2.1 EHEA

Figure 4 demonstrates the Vickers hardness and the compressive stress–strain curves at room temperature for the AlCoCrFeNi2.1-xNi3Al EHEA matrix composites. The specific values of the compressive yield strength, compressive fracture strength, compressive strain, and Vickers hardness are listed in Table 2. As seen in Fig. 4a and Table 2, all the AlCoCrFeNi2.1-xNi3Al EHEA matrix composites exhibit higher hardness above 600 HV, which can be assumed to have better wear resistance. With the increase of Ni3Al content, the hardness of AlCoCrFeNi2.1-xNi3Al composites shows a trend of decreasing from 629 HV (x = 0) to 615 HV (x = 5.0), and then gradually increasing from 615 HV to 626 HV (x = 10). From the Fig. 4b, it can be found that the fracture occurs without significant yield in the AlCoCrFeNi2.1 alloy without the Ni3Al. However, the addition of Ni3Al significantly improves the plasticity of the AlCoCrFeNi2.1 alloy. With the increase of the Ni3Al content, the compressive yield strength and compressive stain of AlCoCrFeNi2.1-xNi3Al EHEA matrix composites gradually increase. The compressive fracture strength first increased, then decreased and finally increased significantly. Wherein, Ni3Al10 composite exhibits excellent comprehensive mechanical properties, the compressive yield strength, the compressive fracture strength, compressive strain, and Vickers hardness are 1845 MPa, 2301 MPa, 10.1%, and 626 HV, respectively. The excellent mechanical properties may be resulted from the balance of the high hardness phase and the high plasticity phase in Ni3Al10 composite. Meanwhile, the double-scale morphology may play a very important role for mechanical property [33, 34].

Fig. 4
figure 4

a Vickers hardness, b compressive stress–strain curve at room temperature of the AlCoCrFeNi2.1-xNi3Al EHEA matrix composites

Table 2 Mechanical properties of the AlCoCrFeNi2.1-xNi3Al EHEA matrix composites

The friction coefficient is a basic parameter of the friction system, and the magnitude of the friction coefficient directly reflects the wear resistant property of the material. The friction coefficient of the AlCoCrFeNi2.1-xNi3Al alloys is obtained, as illustrated in Fig. 5. The average friction coefficients of the AlCoCrFeNi2.1-xNi3Al (x = 0, 5.0, 7.5, 10 wt%) composites are 0.72, 0.5, 0.41, and 0.40, respectively. With the Ni3Al content increasing from 0 to 10 wt%, friction coefficients of AlCoCrFeNi2.1-xNi3Al composites shows a decreasing trend, especially the friction coefficient of Ni3Al10 composites reaches a minimum of 0.40. It can be seen that the friction coefficient of the AlCoCrFeNi2.1-xNi3Al composites with Ni3Al particle added is lower than that of the AlCoCrFeNi2.1 matrix without Ni3Al particle under the same conditions. Which indicated that the addition of Ni3Al can obviously enhance the wear resistant. Among them, the Ni3Al10 alloy shows the lower friction coefficients and the least fluctuations, so it exhibits the best friction behavior.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Friction coefficient curves of the AlCoCrFeNi2.1-xNi3Al EHEA matrix composites

Figure 6 shows the 3D morphologies and wear section profile of the worn surface of the AlCoCrFeNi2.1-xNi3Al EHEA matrix composites. There are many grooves formed by micro-plowing on the worn surface of AlCoCrFeNi2.1-xNi3Al composites, and the micro-plowing phenomenon is first increases and then gradually decreases with the addition of Ni3Al. The width and depth of wear scar on the AlCoCrFeNi2.1-xNi3Al composites with Ni3Al particle added are narrower and shallower (see Fig. 6b–d) than those of AlCoCrFeNi2.1 matrix without Ni3Al particle. Wherein, the Ni3Al10 composite has the narrowest and shallowest wear tracks, which again proves that the Ni3Al10 composite has the best wear resistance.

Fig. 6.
figure 6

3D morphology and cross-section profiles of wear scar at middle part of the AlCoCrFeNi2.1-xNi3Al EHEA matrix composites: a x = 0, b x = 5.0, c x = 7.5, d x = 10

Figure 7 presents the relation between mass loss and microhardness for the AlCoCrFeNi2.1-xNi3Al EHEA matrix composites. With the increase of Ni3Al content, the mass loss gradually decreases, followed by 0.039 g, 0.032 g, 0.019 g and 0.016 g, respectively. According to Archard’s law [35], the wear resistance of the material is positively related to hardness but high hardness will also increase the brittleness of the material, causing the wear resistance to decrease instead [36]. It can be seen that the Ni3Al0 composite having the highest hardness value exhibits the high mass loss, which may due to the high hardness of the composite increases the brittleness. However, the mass loss of the Ni3Al5.0, Ni3Al7.5 and Ni3Al10 composites gradually decreases, which is positively related to hardness. The decreased mass loss of the composites may be resulted from the Ni3Al particles added into the AlCoCrFeNi2.1 leading to the plasticity increased significantly, avoiding the extension of the cracks. This comparison indicates that Ni3Al10 composite exhibits the best wear resistance, possibly owing to the optimal ratio of B2+Cr7C3/Al2O3 hard phases and ductile Ll2+FCC phases for about 1:1.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Relation between mass loss and microhardness for the composites

In order to further analyze the wear mechanism, the SEM images of worn surface of the AlCoCrFeNi2.1-xNi3Al EHEA matrix composites are given in Fig. 8. It can be seen that the wear morphology of the Ni3Al0 matrix is relatively rough (as shown in Fig. 8a), indicating severe wear occurs on the surface. The furrow morphology existed on the Ni3Al0 matrix wear surface, which indicates the occurrence of abrasive wear. In addition, it can be seen from Fig. 8b that a large number of black smooth dense layers (see area A) appear on the wear surface of the Ni3Al0 matrix. The EDS analysis reveals that the black dense layers contain high O element content, indicating that the area A is mainly oxide. It can be inferred that the oxidation reaction occurred on the wear surface, which is generated by the frictional heat generated during friction. Whereas some of the black oxide dense layer is accompanied by micro cracks, as shown in the top right corner of Fig. 8b. The area A with higher hardness reduces the contact area between the counterpart ball and sample surface resulting in the friction process is unstable. Which will cause stress concentration on the sample surface [37], leading to the cracks sprouting and expansion (see Fig. 9a). Then further grow, connect, and propagate along the microcracks as the friction and wear process continue (Fig. 9b). Finally, the mass materials of the surface are removed (see Fig. 9c), which leads to the high friction coefficient and mass loss of Ni3Al0 matrix. In short, the main mechanism of Ni3Al0 matrix is oxidation wear accompanied by slight abrasive wear.

Fig. 8
figure 8

SEM images of AlCoCrFeNi2.1-xNi3Al EHEA matrix composites after wear: a and b x = 0, c and d x = 5.0, e and f x = 7.5, g and h x = 10

Fig. 9
figure 9

ac Schematic of microstructural evolution mechanism of “crack” phenomenon

On the surface of the Ni3Al5.0 composite exhibits the general characteristics of the toughness deformation of the soft material wear surface along the sliding direction (see Fig. 8c), which is due to the sudden increase of plasticity and the hardness reduction with the addition of Ni3Al. As well as the wear surface retains a small amount of O-enriched dense friction layer (see Fig. 8d). Thus, the main mechanism of Ni3Al5.0 composite is abrasive wear accompanied by slight oxidation wear.

Unlike the previous worn surfaces, when the Ni3Al content increases to 0.75 and 10, the wear surface changes smoothly with a few small adhered fragments and fine shallow furrows (see Fig. 8e–h), indicating that the wear resistance increases. During the friction process, the hard B2+Cr7C3/Al2O3 phases play a supporting role to avoid a lot of abrasive wear, while the soft Ll2+FCC phases can prevent the brittle fracture of the alloy and reduces wear mass loss. Hence, the coupled interaction of the hard B2+Cr7C3/Al2O3 phases and the ductile Ll2+FCC phases make the composites exhibit excellent wear resistance. In short, the main wear mechanism of Ni3Al7.5 and Ni3Al10 composites are adhesive and abrasive wear.

4 Conclusions

AlCoCrFeNi2.1-xNi3Al (x = 0, 5, 7.5, 10 wt%) EHEA matrix composites were successfully prepared by powder metallurgy. The effects of Ni3Al particle content on the microstructure, mechanical properties and wear resistance of the AlCoCrFeNi2.1-xNi3Al alloys were investigated. The main conclusions are as follows:

  1. 1.

    The AlCoCrFeNi2.1-xNi3Al EHEA matrix composites present cellular grid microstructure composing of main FCC/Ll2 and B2 phases, and a small amount of Al2O3 and Cr7C3 phases.

  2. 2.

    With the addition of Ni3Al particles, compressive fracture strength, compressive yield strength and compressive strain of the AlCoCrFeNi2.1-xNi3Al EHEA matrix composites enhance significantly. Wherein, the Ni3Al10 alloy exhibit excellent comprehensive mechanical properties with the compressive yield strength of 1845 MPa, compressive fracture strength of 2301 MPa, and the compressive strain of the 10.1%.

  3. 3.

    The friction coefficient, wear width and depth, and mass loss of the AlCoCrFeNi2.1-xNi3Al (x > 0) EHEA matrix composites were significantly lower than that of the AlCoCrFeNi2.1 alloy matrix under the same frictional wear conditions. Among them, the Ni3Al10 alloy has the best wear performance, and the wear mechanism is main abrasive wear with a small amount of adhesive wear.