Abstract
Introduction
Pertussis, a contagious respiratory disease, is underreported in adults. The study objective was to quantify underestimation of pertussis cases in adults aged ≥ 50 years in five Latin American countries (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Mexico, Peru).
Methods
A previously published probabilistic model was adapted to adjust the number of pertussis cases reported to national surveillance systems by successive multiplication steps (proportion of pertussis cases seeking healthcare; proportion with a specimen collected; proportion sent for confirmatory testing; proportion positive for pertussis; proportion reported to passive surveillance). The proportions at each step were added in a random effects model to produce a pooled overall proportion, and a final multiplier was calculated as the simple inverse of this proportion. This multiplier was applied to the number of cases reported to surveillance to estimate the number of pertussis cases. Monte Carlo simulation with 10,000 iterations estimated median as well as upper and lower 90% values. Input data were obtained from surveillance systems and published sources.
Results
The estimated median underestimation factor for pertussis cases in adults ranged from 104 (90% limits 40, 451) in Chile to 114 (90% limits 39, 419) in Argentina. In all five countries, the largest estimated number of cases was in the group aged 50–59 years. The highest number per 100,000 population was in the group aged ≥ 90 years in most countries. The estimated median underestimation factor for pertussis hospitalizations was 2.3 (90% limits 1.8, 3.3) in Brazil and 2.4 (90% limits 1.8, 3.2) in Chile (data not available for other countries).
Conclusion
This analysis indicates that the number of pertussis cases in adults aged ≥ 50 years in five Latin American countries is approximately 100 times higher than the number captured in surveillance data. These results could support decision-making in the diagnosis, management, and prevention of pertussis disease in adults.
Plain Language Summary
Pertussis, also called whooping cough, is an infectious respiratory disease that can be severe in infants and older adults, and can cause complications in people with other conditions such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma. Although it is compulsory to report cases of pertussis infection in many countries, it is known that many pertussis cases in adults are not captured (underreported). The aim of this study was to measure pertussis underestimation in adults aged 50 years or over in five Latin American countries (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Mexico, Peru). There are several steps to identify a pertussis case (seeking medical care; specimen collected for testing; specimen sent for testing; pertussis confirmed by testing; case reported), and at each step there is potential for underestimation. These steps were combined in a model to calculate a multiplication factor to estimate the real burden of pertussis. The results showed that the estimated number of pertussis cases in adults aged 50 years or over in five Latin American countries is approximately 100 times higher than the number reported. These results show that pertussis is common in older adults, and should help to support health authorities and doctors making decisions about the management of pertussis disease.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Why carry out this study? | |
Pertussis is a highly contagious respiratory illness. Current disease surveillance systems underreport the potential number of cases, especially in adolescents and adults. | |
What was learned from the study? | |
The aims of this study were to quantify the underestimation of pertussis in adults aged 50 years or over in Latin American countries (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Mexico, Peru), and to estimate a multiplier factor to assess the potential burden of pertussis disease in this age group. | |
The estimated number of pertussis cases in adults aged 50 years or over was a median of 104 (90% limits 40–451) to 114 (90% limits 39–419) times the number of cases reported to surveillance systems in five Latin American countries. | |
These results highlight the substantial disease burden of pertussis in older adults, and should help to support decision-making in the management of pertussis disease. |
Introduction
Pertussis, also known as whooping cough, is an acute respiratory illness characterized by a distinctive cough. Most cases (86–95%) are caused by infection with the Gram-negative bacterium Bordetella pertussis, with some cases, usually milder, caused by Bordetella parapertussis [1]. Pertussis is highly contagious, and in an immune-naïve population one primary case has been estimated to cause a mean of 17 secondary cases [2], similar to measles and higher than mumps, rubella, poliomyelitis, smallpox, or influenza [3]. In newborns and young infants, pertussis can be a severe illness requiring hospitalization and intensive care, and the case fatality rate of pertussis in newborns has been estimated at 1–3% [1]. While most current vaccination programs focus on preventing pertussis in infants, the epidemiology of pertussis has shifted towards older age groups such as adolescents and adults [4]. Approximately 20% of pertussis cases are estimated to occur in adolescents aged 10–19 years and 25% in adults aged 20 years or over in the USA [1]. A study in five European countries (Finland, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and UK) estimated pertussis incidence at 1–6% per year, with a peak in adolescents and a second peak in young adults [4].
The clinical presentation of pertussis changes with age, with data suggesting that adults are at increased risk of complications and severe disease requiring hospitalization from pertussis, compared with adolescents [5, 6]. Pertussis can lead to complications linked directly to bacterial infection or as a consequence of the cough associated with pertussis. After children, adults aged ≥ 50 years are most at risk of complications from pertussis; in a study in Canada, 6% of patients aged ≥ 50 years were hospitalized [6]. In this study of pertussis morbidity in Canada (N = 664), the proportion of cases with at least one complication was higher in adults (aged ≥ 18 years) than in adolescents (aged 12–17 years) (28% vs 16%, respectively; P < 0.001), with reported complications including pneumonia, sinusitis, otitis media, urinary incontinence, weight loss, rib fracture, and fainting [6]. In a review of 18 publications, adults and adolescents with conditions such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, and obesity were found to be at potentially increased risk of being diagnosed with pertussis [7]. Asthma, COPD, immune deficiency, and smoking were associated with worse pertussis symptoms and increased risk of hospitalization for pertussis-related complications [7].
The incidence of pertussis in adults and older adults, based on serological studies and estimates of the fraction of medically attended cough illness attributable to pertussis, is estimated to be substantially higher than reported in surveillance data, meaning the true burden of disease among older adults is underestimated [8, 9]. Several successive steps are required to identify a pertussis case, as illustrated schematically in Fig. 1. Starting with the total number of cases at the bottom of the pyramid, a fraction are symptomatic, a further fraction of symptomatic cases attend healthcare, a further fraction of those attending healthcare receive a confirmed pertussis diagnosis, and finally a fraction of those with confirmed pertussis diagnosis are reported to surveillance systems. At each step, there is potential for underestimation and many factors can affect the fraction retained at each level, such as perceived severity of symptoms, limited access to healthcare, lack of awareness of pertussis disease, limitations in routine diagnostic capability and limitations in reporting systems [10]. The clinical features of pertussis may be mild or atypical in adults, often without the characteristic whoop [11]. Limitations in timing and specificity of diagnostic tests make laboratory confirmation challenging, and late presentation to healthcare professionals among adults may also contribute to underdiagnosis [12, 13]. The underestimation of pertussis disease in adults can occur at two levels: underascertainment and underreporting. Underascertainment is used to cover cases that do not seek healthcare, and underreporting to cover cases that have sought healthcare but not been reported to surveillance (Fig. 1), although definitions vary [10]. In this study, underestimation is used to describe the fraction of pertussis cases not captured by surveillance systems, and includes both underascertainment and underreporting.
It is important to understand the burden of pertussis in adolescents and adults. Many countries have surveillance systems in place that rely on statutory clinical notification of cases and laboratory reports [14]. However, underestimation of disease burden is a recognized problem in surveillance systems, particularly for infectious diseases [10]. A systematic literature review assessing the burden of pertussis in Latin American countries (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Panama, and Uruguay) highlighted the limited epidemiological data available in adolescents, adults, and older adults as well as the need for standardized diagnostic tools and improvement of surveillance systems [15].
The objective of this study was to quantify the underestimation of pertussis in adults aged 50 years and over in five Latin American countries (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Mexico, Peru), by quantifying an underestimation multiplier factor that can be applied to surveillance results to estimate the potential number of pertussis cases in older adults in these countries.
Methods
Model
We adapted a published model used previously to estimate the number of people infected with pandemic H1N1 influenza in 2009 [16] and acute viral hepatitis in 2011 [17] in the USA. This model was considered applicable to pertussis because viral hepatitis and influenza share some similar surveillance challenges with pertussis. These similarities include many infections being atypical and/or asymptomatic; not all sick people seek healthcare; specimens sometimes produce false results; and not all cases are reported to health departments.
The model was a simple probabilistic multiplier model that aimed to estimate the fraction of adult patients aged 50 years or over with pertussis who would have been diagnosed and reported to surveillance systems in five countries in Latin America (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Mexico and Peru). Briefly, the model adjusted the number of pertussis cases reported to surveillance systems in each country by successive multiplication steps, as outlined in Fig. 2. These steps described the proportion of pertussis cases who would seek medical care, the proportion of those who had a specimen collected, the proportion of collected specimens sent for confirmatory testing, the proportion of tests positive for pertussis, and the proportion of positive tests reported to passive surveillance systems.
The proportions at each step were added in a random effects model to produce a pooled overall proportion, and a final multiplier was calculated as the simple inverse of this proportion. This multiplier was then applied to the number of cases reported to each national surveillance system to derive an estimate of the potential number and incidence of pertussis cases in each country.
To account for variability and uncertainty in the model parameters, a probabilistic approach using Monte Carlo simulation was applied. For each parameter, the model randomly sampled a value using a uniform probability distribution covering a range of minimum to maximum values. Results from 10,000 iterations were used to estimate median as well as upper and lower 90% values for the estimated number of cases.
To produce estimated case numbers for five age groups (50–59, 60–69, 70–79, 80–89, and 90 years or over), the estimated total case numbers were divided according to published data on the age distribution of pertussis in older adults.
Input Data
The size of the population aged 50 years or over, stratified into five age groups (50–59, 60–69, 70–79, 80–89, and 90 years or over), in each country in 2020 was obtained from United Nations estimates [18] (Table 1).
Data on the number of pertussis cases in adults aged 50 years or over reported to national surveillance systems during the period from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2021 were obtained from the national health ministries in Argentina [19], Brazil [20], Chile [21], Mexico [22], and Peru [23] (Table 2). Data on the number of pertussis hospitalizations reported over the same period for this age group were available only for Brazil [24] and Chile. The hospitalization data for Chile were obtained directly from the Ministry of Health (Ministerio de Salud [MINSAL], Chile. Unidad de Transparencia. Solicitud de Acceso a la Información Pública—Ley de Transparencia. Folio N AO001T0019380. Received 17 May 2023). The final surveillance data for Argentina were obtained through a request to the Ministry of Health through Public Data Transparency Laws (Reference number EX2023-28921934-APN-DNPAIP#AAIP), and comprised two hospitalizations (one from 2017 and one from 2018) and zero cases reported for the total study period. It is not feasible to run the model with a data input of zero, so the model for Argentina was run using the two hospitalized cases as a minimum proxy for ambulatory cases. It was not possible to run the hospitalization model for Argentina because of the limited data.
The model was capable of producing results for two distinct periods, 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2019 and 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2021, to allow the option of analyzing the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic period separately. However, as the available surveillance data were limited, the model was run for the total time period.
The age distribution of pertussis in adults aged 50 years or over was adapted from a study in England [25] (Table 3). The age distribution for pertussis hospitalizations was adapted from a separate published study in Australia [26] (Table 3). The same age distributions for cases and hospitalizations were applied for all countries in the study.
Minimum and maximum values for the input data for parameters of pertussis disease at each of the steps in Fig. 2, for non-hospitalized and hospitalized pertussis cases, were obtained from published literature [9, 27, 28] and a Delphi panel consensus with experts in Brazil [29] (Table 4). The same parameter ranges were used in all countries in the study.
Statement of Ethics Compliance
Ethics approval was not required as this study was based on published data and therefore did not involve human participants. Data for Chile and Argentina were obtained via Public Data Transparency Laws. All the disease data were extracted from publicly accessible surveillance system databases which report aggregated anonymized data.
Results
Estimated Multipliers
Table 5 shows the estimated median multiplier factors, together with upper and lower 90% limits, for pertussis cases in all five countries and for pertussis hospitalizations in Brazil and Chile. The estimated median multiplier for pertussis cases ranged from 104 (90% limits 40, 451) in Chile to 114 (90% limits 39, 419) in Argentina. The multiplier values were similar across all countries studied, because the same pertussis input data were used across all countries. The variability in the multiplier was derived from the probabilistic model. The multiplier values indicate that every pertussis case reported to national surveillance systems in adults aged 50 years or over represents approximately 100 cases that are not captured by surveillance. For hospitalizations in Brazil and Chile, the estimated multipliers were much smaller (in Brazil, median 2.3, lower and upper 90% limits 1.8, 3.3; in Chile, median 2.4, lower and upper 90% limits 1.8, 3.2).
Estimated Pertussis Case and Hospitalization Numbers
The estimated median and 90% limits of pertussis cases by age in each country are shown in Table 6, and the estimated median numbers of pertussis cases per 100,000 population are shown in Table 6 and Fig. 3. The highest estimated number of cases per 100,000 population was in Chile (Fig. 3). In all the countries, the largest estimated number of cases was in the group aged 50–59 years (Table 6). In all countries except Chile and Argentina, the highest number per 100,000 population was in the oldest age group, aged 90 years or over (Fig. 3, Table 6).
The estimated median number and 90% limits for pertussis hospitalizations in Brazil and Chile are shown in Table 6. Hospitalization data were not available for the other countries. The age group with the highest number of hospitalizations was the group aged 70–79 years. The highest number of hospitalizations per 100,000 population occurred in the group aged 90 years or over (Table 6), which would be consistent with declining immunity to infection resulting from immunosenescence, frailty, and presence of comorbidities.
Discussion
Although pertussis is a mandatory notifiable disease regardless of age in all countries in this study [30,31,32,33,34], many cases in adults are not captured by surveillance systems. This issue of underestimation is also recognized in other countries. For example, a community cohort study in healthy people in South Africa estimated the incidence of pertussis at 0.21 per 100 person-weeks, higher than the previously reported mean annual incidence of 17 per 100,000 population in patients hospitalized for pneumonia [35]. To our knowledge, this is the first study in Latin America to estimate the underestimation rate for pertussis in adults aged 50 years or over based on a probabilistic model using data from literature and national surveillance systems. Our results indicated that the number of pertussis cases in these countries is approximately 104–114 times higher than the number reported to national surveillance systems. The 90% limits around the estimated median values were broad, with a lower limit of 39 to 41 and an upper limit of 419 to 482, reflecting some uncertainty in some of the input values for the pertussis parameters in the model. For pertussis hospitalizations, the median estimated multipliers were smaller and had narrower 90% limits (in Brazil, median 2.3, lower and upper 90% limits 1.8, 3.3; in Chile, median 2.4, lower and upper 90% limits 1.8, 3.2). This is because the data inputs used for the proportion seeking healthcare and the proportions with a specimen collected and sent for testing were higher and less variable in patients hospitalized for pertussis disease, compared with non-hospitalized cases. The median multiplier estimates were similar for all five countries, because the same pertussis input data were used across all countries, and the variability in the multipliers was derived from the probabilistic model. If the study had used different input data values for each country, it is likely that the multipliers would also have differed between the countries. We were not able to use country-specific input data because of a lack of available information. The limited real-world surveillance data available for pertussis cases in adults in the selected countries might suggest differences in the multipliers between the countries. However, considering the scarcity of parameter data for pertussis in adults, we standardized the input data in the present simplistic model, resulting in little difference between the resulting country multipliers. The results aim to serve as baseline data that can be used in sensitivity analyses in further modelling studies. Even with the small multiplier range, our results provide a baseline estimate for specific country pertussis incidence, adjusted to country-specific population and surveillance data stratified by age group.
Our results are broadly consistent with previous studies in Europe and Israel that have also estimated pertussis reporting rates to be hundreds of times lower than the number of infections estimated from serological data. In Israel, the incidence of pertussis infection in 2000, estimated from serology, was 2448 per 100,000 population aged 3 years or over, compared with 5.6 per 100,000 for reported pertussis cases in the same year, indicating an incidence of infection approximately 400 times higher than the incidence of notified clinical pertussis cases [36]. In the Netherlands, pertussis incidence estimated by serology was 6.6% per year for people aged 3–79 years, approximately 685 times higher than the 0.01% annual incidence of notified cases [37]. Our estimated median case numbers of approximately 100 times higher than reported data are somewhat lower than the results from these studies, but the 90% upper limit of our estimates (419 to 482) is similar to the value reported in the Israeli study [36]. Our results are also broadly consistent with a study in the USA that estimated undiagnosed pertussis cases in adolescents and adults with reported acute respiratory disease using clinician notes in an electronic health record database, using a machine learning algorithm [38]. This US study found that accounting for undiagnosed pertussis episodes increased the estimated pertussis incidence by 110-fold on average [38]. This estimate is very similar to our median estimated multiplier of 104–114.
There is a consensus that reported pertussis cases are likely to be considerably lower than the real number of pertussis cases [39]. Underreporting is a particular problem in older age groups, as the only symptom in adults and adolescents may be prolonged cough, for which patients may present late or not at all, and which may be misdiagnosed if clinicians perceive pertussis as a childhood disease [39]. In Italy, the estimated incidence of pertussis based on seroprevalence data in the population aged ≥ 15 years was 3464 times higher than the rate of notified pertussis cases in 2018, while in the population aged 6–14 years the estimated incidence from seroprevalence was 141 times the notification rate [40]. A study in the Netherlands reported a remarkable difference in the age distribution for notified pertussis cases compared with infection rates estimated from serological data [37]. The incidence of notified cases was highest in infants (77.2 per 100,000 in the first year of life) and young children (87.4 per 100,000 in children aged 3–4 years and 63.1 per 100,000 in children aged 5–9 years), decreasing sharply to around 1–3 per 100,000 in adults aged 20 years or over. By contrast, the estimated incidence was lowest in children aged 3–4 years (3299 per 100,000), reached a peak in young adults aged 20–24 years (10,831 per 100,000), and fluctuated around 6,500 per 100,000 in adults aged 25–54 years and around 4000 per 100,000 in adults aged 55 years or over [37].
The number of pertussis cases per 100,000 population estimated in this study varied between countries, with the highest estimates in Chile. This reflects the higher number of pertussis surveillance reports in Chile, which results in a larger number of cases as the multiplier is similar as a result of a lack of country-specific data for the pertussis inputs in the model. The present study was not intended to make comparisons between the countries. It illustrates the potential magnitude of underestimation of pertussis, and there is considerable uncertainty in the estimates, as indicated by the broad 90% limits around the median values. In a study comparing the number of isolates of invasive pneumococcal disease reported to surveillance with the expected number of cases based on regional disease incidence data, Chile had the highest rate of reporting (43–83%) of the six Latin American countries in the study [41]. Other researchers have reported wide variations in pertussis prevalence between countries; in a study in 12 European countries conducted in 2007–2010, the percentage of adult patients presenting to primary care with acute cough who were found to have B. pertussis ranged from 0% in Italy to 6.2% in Sweden [42]. A review of the literature reported rates of pertussis underreporting varying from 5 to 50% in Brazil, Colombia, Spain, and the USA, and in the Netherlands a multiplier factor of 3 for infants and 200 for adults [43]. However, comparison of pertussis incidence between countries is difficult because of factors such as differences in case definitions, diagnosis methods, and reporting systems [39]. Open-source data may provide useful information on pertussis outbreaks globally, especially in countries that lack national surveillance systems [44]. Most studies of the cost-effectiveness of pertussis vaccination in adolescents and adults attempt to take account of underreporting of pertussis cases in these age groups. For example, a review of 27 economic evaluations of vaccination strategies for tetanus–diphtheria–acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) in a range of countries found that 18 of the 20 studies that considered adult or adolescent pertussis incidence used some strategy to correct for pertussis underreporting [45].
In most of the countries in the study, the highest number of pertussis cases per 100,000 population was in the oldest age group, aged 90 years or over. The data in Table 1 indicate that the five countries in the study have slightly different population structures, with the percentage of people in the group aged 50–59 years highest in Brazil (45%), Mexico (47%), and Peru (45%). This may indicate a potential future increase in the burden of pertussis in these countries as this group reaches older ages.
The present study has a number of strengths. It used an established model developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention which has previously been applied to influenza [16] and hepatitis [17]. Furthermore, it provides a simplified way to visualize and quantify pertussis underestimation in older adults in Latin America. This should help to increase awareness of the health burden of pertussis in adults among health officials and clinicians, helping to support surveillance and prevention activities.
Nevertheless, the study has a number of limitations. Data for hospitalizations were available for only two countries, Brazil and Chile, and therefore the estimated multiplier for hospitalizations was based only on these two countries as there were no others to construct the probabilistic model. Further data on hospitalizations from other countries would improve the analysis, if such data become available in the future. Surveillance data from Argentina were also limited, with a total of two hospitalizations (one from 2017 and one from 2018) and zero cases reported across the whole study period. It is not feasible to run the model with a data input of zero, so the model for Argentina was run using the two hospitalized cases as a minimum proxy for ambulatory cases. With these very small numbers, it is possible that even the predicted cases could have a degree of underestimation. The study collected data from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2021, and this included the period of the COVID-19 pandemic, which could have affected data collection. We constructed the model with the ability to split the analysis into two separate periods, 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2019 and 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2021, so that the COVID-19 pandemic period could be excluded if necessary. However, there was little difference in surveillance results between the two periods, so results are presented across the whole study duration. The analysis involved several assumptions, and data for parameter estimates were sparse, indirect and sometimes limited in geographical scope. Few studies have assessed underestimation in adults with pertussis. In Latin America, we identified only one published source with an estimate of the frequency of healthcare-seeking among adults with pertussis [27], and one reporting results from a Delphi panel [29]. Both these publications were from Brazil, reflecting its position as the largest country in the region. The issues with pertussis diagnosis and testing in adults are similar across all countries in Latin America, so it is likely that data from Brazil will be applicable to other countries in the region. For other inputs, we had to use data from countries outside Latin America, which may not be representative of the countries in the analysis. To account for some of this uncertainty, we used a probabilistic model with a range of values for each parameter. In addition, the case definition of pertussis may have varied between the studies from which parameter values were obtained, and since adults with milder illness may be less likely to seek care or be tested, they may not be fully captured in these estimates. Furthermore, we did not evaluate variability or uncertainty in the model parameters using sensitivity analysis. If more accurate and detailed parameter data become available in the future from surveys of health-seeking behavior, testing practices and policies, this would help to improve the estimates in this study. In the meantime, the estimates presented here should help to support decision-making for the management of pertussis in older adults in Latin America.
Conclusion
This analysis investigated the underestimation of pertussis in adults aged 50 years or over in five countries in Latin America, adapting a previously published probabilistic model and data from surveillance systems and the literature. Our results suggest that the number of pertussis cases in adults aged 50 years or over may be approximately 100 times higher than the numbers captured by surveillance systems. These results highlight the substantial disease burden of pertussis in older adults and should help to support decision-making in the management of pertussis disease.
Data Availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Nieves DJ, Heininger U. Bordetella pertussis. Microbiol Spectr. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.EI10-0008-2015.
Schellekens J, von König CH, Gardner P. Pertussis sources of infection and routes of transmission in the vaccination era. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2005;24(5 Suppl):S19-24. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.inf.0000160909.24879.e6.
Biggerstaff M, Cauchemez S, Reed C, Gambhir M, Finelli L. Estimates of the reproduction number for seasonal, pandemic, and zoonotic influenza: a systematic review of the literature. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:480. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-480.
Kretzschmar M, Teunis PF, Pebody RG. Incidence and reproduction numbers of pertussis: estimates from serological and social contact data in five European countries. PLoS Med. 2010;7(6):e1000291. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000291.
Clarke MF, Rasiah K, Copland J, et al. The pertussis epidemic: informing strategies for prevention of severe disease. Epidemiol Infect. 2013;141(3):463–71. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095026881200091X.
De Serres G, Shadmani R, Duval B, et al. Morbidity of pertussis in adolescents and adults. J Infect Dis. 2000;182(1):174–9. https://doi.org/10.1086/315648.
Jenkins VA, Savic M, Kandeil W. Pertussis in high-risk groups: an overview of the past quarter-century. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2020;16(11):2609–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2020.1738168.
Orenstein WA. Pertussis in adults: epidemiology, signs, symptoms, and implications for vaccination. Clin Infect Dis. 1999;28(Suppl 2):S147–50. https://doi.org/10.1086/515061.
Masseria C, Krishnarajah G. The estimated incidence of pertussis in people aged 50 years old in the United States, 2006–2010. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15:534. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-1269-1.
Gibbons CL, Mangen MJ, Plass D, et al. Measuring underreporting and under-ascertainment in infectious disease datasets: a comparison of methods. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:147. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-147.
Riffelmann M, Littmann M, Hellenbrand W, Hülße C, Wirsing von König CH. Pertussis: not only a disease of childhood. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2008;105(37):623–8. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2008.0623.
Choi JH, Correia de Sousa J, Fletcher M, et al. Improving vaccination rates in older adults and at-risk groups: focus on pertussis. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2022;34(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-021-02018-3.
Cherry JD, Tan T, Wirsing von König CH, et al. Clinical definitions of pertussis: summary of a Global Pertussis Initiative roundtable meeting, February 2011. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54(12):1756–64. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cis302.
Crowcroft NS, Pebody RG. Recent developments in pertussis. Lancet. 2006;367(9526):1926–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68848-X.
Nunes A, Abreu A, Furtado B, Soares da Silva A, Coelho EB, de Barros EN. Epidemiology of pertussis among adolescents, adults, and older adults in selected countries of Latin American: a systematic review. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021;17(6):1733–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2020.1827613.
Reed C, Angulo FJ, Swerdlow DL, et al. Estimates of the prevalence of pandemic (H1N1) 2009, United States, April-July 2009. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15(12):2004–7. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1512.091413.
Klevens RM, Liu S, Roberts H, Jiles RB, Holmberg SD. Estimating acute viral hepatitis infections from nationally reported cases. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(3):482–7. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301601.
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division. World Population Prospects 2019. https://population.un.org/wpp/Download/Standard/Population/ Accessed 23 Dec 2022.
Ministerio de Salud Argentina. Boletin Integrado de Vigilancia (Edicion Ampliada). https://bancos.salud.gob.ar/bancos/materiales-para-equipos-de-salud/soporte/boletines-epidemiologicos/. Accessed 23 Dec 2022.
Sistema de Informação de Agravos de Notificacão (SINAN) (Brazil). Portal Da Saúde. https://datasus.saude.gov.br/acesso-a-informacao/doencas-e-agravos-de-notificacao-de-2007-em-diante-sinan/. Accessed 23 Dec 2022.
Ministerio de Salud (MINSAL) Chile. Departamento de Epidemiologia. Informe Epidemiologico: Coqueluche 2021. http://epi.minsal.cl/coqueluche-situacion-epidemiologica/. Accessed 23 Dec 2022.
Secretaria de Salud Mexico. Direccion General de Epidemiologia (DGE), Anuarios de Morbilidad. 2017 - 2021. https://epidemiologia.salud.gob.mx/anuario/html/index.html. Accessed 23 Dec 2022.
Ministerio de Salud (MINSA) Peru. Centro Nacional de Epidemiologia, prevencion y Control de Enfermedades. Numero de Casos de Tos Ferina, Peru 2017–2022. https://www.dge.gob.pe/portal/docs/vigilancia/sala/2022/SE07/tosf.pdf. Accessed 23 Dec 2022.
Sistema de informações hospitalares-SIH Brazil. Informações Saúde - Tabnet. https://datasus.saude.gov.br/acesso-a-informacao/morbidade-hospitalar-do-sus-sih-sus/. Accessed 23 Dec 2022.
Harrington L, Aris E, Bhavsar A, et al. Burden of pertussis in adults aged 50 years and older: a retrospective database study in England. Infect Dis Ther. 2023;12(4):1103–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-023-00774-5.
Karki S, McIntyre P, Newall AT, MacIntyre CR, Banks E, Liu B. Risk factors for pertussis hospitalizations in Australians aged 45 years and over: a population based nested case-control study. Vaccine. 2015;33(42):5647–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.08.068.
Fernandes EG, Sartori AMC, de Soárez PC, Amaku M, de Azevedo Neto RS, Novaes HMD. Cost-effectiveness analysis of universal adult immunization with tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) versus current practice in Brazil. Vaccine. 2020;38(1):46–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.09.100.
Hodder SL, Cherry JD, Mortimer EA Jr, Ford AB, Gornbein J, Papp K. Antibody responses to Bordetella pertussis antigens and clinical correlations in elderly community residents. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;31(1):7–14. https://doi.org/10.1086/313913.
Zanghelini F, da Rocha Pitta MG, de Veras B, et al. The pathway to diagnose pertussis in adults with asthma and COPD in Brazil: A Delphi consensus approach (Poster 2197). Presented at XIII Congresso Brasileiro de Asma, Curitiba, Brasil. (August 2–5, 2023). 2023.
Ministerio de Salud y Desarrolla Social. Boletín Integrado de Vigilancia https://bancos.salud.gob.ar/sites/default/files/2020-01/boletin-integrado-vigilancia-n448.pdf. Accessed 9 May 2023.
Fernandes EG, Sartori AMC, de Soárez PC, Carvalhanas T, Rodrigues M, Novaes HMD. Challenges of interpreting epidemiologic surveillance pertussis data with changing diagnostic and immunization practices: the case of the state of Sao Paulo, Brazil. BMC Infect Dis. 2018;18(1):126. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-018-3004-1.
Ministerio de Salud Chile. Enfermedades de notificación obligatoria. http://epi.minsal.cl/enfermedades-de-notificacion-obligatoria/. Accessed 9 May 2023.
Diario Oficial de la Federación. NORMA Oficial Mexicana NOM-017-SSA2–2012, Para la vigilancia epidemiológica. https://dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5288225&fecha=19/02/2013&print=true. Accessed 9 May 2023.
Ministerio de Salud (MINSA) Peru. Visto el Expediente N° 12–090566–001, que contiene los memorandos N° 1552 y 1819–2012-DGE-DVE-DSVSP/MINSA de la Dirección General de Epidemiología del Ministerio de Salud. https://www.dge.gob.pe/portal/docs/normas/rm/2012/RM948-2012.pdf. Accessed 9 May 2023.
Moosa F, Tempia S, Kleynhans J, et al. Incidence and transmission dynamics of bordetella pertussis infection in rural and urban communities, South Africa, 2016–2018. Emerg Infect Dis. 2023;29(2):294–303. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2902.221125.
Rendi-Wagner P, Tobias J, Moerman L, et al. The seroepidemiology of Bordetella pertussis in Israel—estimate of incidence of infection. Vaccine. 2010;28(19):3285–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.02.104.
de Melker HE, Versteegh FG, Schellekens JF, Teunis PF, Kretzschmar M. The incidence of Bordetella pertussis infections estimated in the population from a combination of serological surveys. J Infect. 2006;53(2):106–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2005.10.020.
Macina D, Mathur S, Dvaretskaya M, et al. Estimating the pertussis burden in adolescents and adults in the United States between 2007 and 2019. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2023;19(1):2208514. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2023.2208514.
Tan T, Trindade E, Skowronski D. Epidemiology of pertussis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2005;24(5 Suppl):S10–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.inf.0000160708.43944.99.
Bagordo F, Grassi T, Savio M, et al. Assessment of pertussis underreporting in Italy. J Clin Med. 2023;12(5):1732. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12051732.
Nieto Guevara J, Guzman-Holst A. Laboratory-based surveillance in Latin America: attributes and limitations in evaluation of pneumococcal vaccine impact. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021;17(11):4667–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2021.1972709.
Teepe J, Broekhuizen BD, Ieven M, et al. Prevalence, diagnosis, and disease course of pertussis in adults with acute cough: a prospective, observational study in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2015;65(639):e662–7. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp15X686917.
Fuentes C, Álvarez F, Glavic V, Gray A, Jiménez R, Namizato C. Vacunación contra la Bordetella pertussis en gestantes del Perú : evaluación socioeconómica de un proyecto de inversión pública. https://repositorio.esan.edu.pe/handle/20.500.12640/1803. Accessed 9 May 2023.
Stone H, Moa A, MacIntyre CR, Chughtai AA. Using open source data to estimate the global epidemiology of pertussis. Global Biosecurity. 2020. https://doi.org/10.31646/gbio.65.
Fernandes EG, Rodrigues CCM, Sartori AMC, De Soarez PC, Novaes HMD. Economic evaluation of adolescents and adults’ pertussis vaccination: a systematic review of current strategies. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2019;15(1):14–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2018.1509646.
Medical Writing and Editorial Assistance
The authors would like to thank Business & Decision Life Sciences platform for editorial assistance and manuscript coordination, on behalf of GSK. Carole Nadin (Fleetwith Ltd, on behalf of GSK) provided writing support.
Funding
GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA funded this study (GSK study identifier VEO-000349) and was involved in all stages of study conduct, including analysis of the data. GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA also took in charge all costs associated with the development and publication of this manuscript, including the journal’s Rapid Service fee.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Adriana Guzman-Holst, Jorge A Gomez, Otavio Cintra, Desirée Van Oorschot, Nicolas Jamet and Javier Nieto-Guevara: contributed to the study conception, design, and data interpretation. Data collection and analysis were performed by AG-H and JN-G. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. All authors had full access to the data and agreed with the submission of the publication.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Adriana Guzman-Holst, Jorge A Gomez, Otavio Cintra, Desirée Van Oorschot, Nicolas Jamet and Javier Nieto-Guevara are employees of GSK. Adriana Guzman-Holst, Jorge A Gomez, Otavio Cintra, Desirée Van Oorschot and Javier Nieto-Guevara hold shares in GSK. All authors declare no other financial or non-financial relationships and activities and no other conflicts of interest.
Ethical Approval
Ethics approval was not required as this study was based on published data and therefore did not involve human participants. Data for Chile and Argentina were obtained via Public Data Transparency Laws. All the disease data were extracted from publicly accessible surveillance system databases which report aggregated anonymized data.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Guzman-Holst, A., Gomez, J.A., Cintra, O. et al. Assessing the Underestimation of Adult Pertussis Disease in Five Latin American Countries. Infect Dis Ther 12, 2791–2806 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-023-00895-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-023-00895-x