Introduction

Water pollution has been regarded as a global environmental problem with harmful effect on human health and ecological safety. Heavy metals and microbial contaminants make the problem more and more serious (Fawell and Nieuwenhuijsen 2003). To avoid pollution damages from these contaminants, it is critical to kill bacteria and remove heavy metal from water (Nancharaiah et al. 2015). Adsorption as an alternative process in water treatment has the characteristics of simplicity, rapidness, high efficiency and low cost (Ali and Gupta 2007; Ali et al. 2012; Ali 2014). Different adsorbents including active carbon, nanosized metal oxide materials have been used for pollutants removal from water (Ali et al. 2016a, b, c; Ali 2010, 2012). Biosorption using biological materials as adsorbents has also been considered as a perfect method for the removal of the low concentration of pollutant from water (Hansda et al. 2016; Li and Tao 2015). Microorganisms as a biological adsorbent have a good adsorption for heavy metal (Javanbakht et al. 2014). Different types of microorganisms such as bacteria and yeast can be used to remove heavy metal with the advantages of simple preparation, low cost and environment friendliness (Li et al. 2013; Barboza et al. 2015).

Silver nanomaterials with broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity have been widely applied in water disinfection and microbial control (Loo et al. 2013; Lin et al. 2013). Though many chemical and physical methods could be used to prepare silver nanomaterials, these synthesis methods were characterized by high energy consumption, low efficiency and secondary pollution (Zhang et al. 2016). Recently, biosynthesis of silver nanomaterials has been developed as a low-cost, convenient, efficient and environmentally friendly method (Salunke et al. 2016; Velusamy et al. 2016; Ahmad et al. 2016). Microorganisms as nanomaterials biosynthesis factories have the potential to prepare silver nanomaterials. Moreover, the synthesized bionanocomposites can be used to remove pollutants such as pesticide and bacteria due to the adsorption property of microorganisms and the antibacterial property of silver nanomaterials (Das et al. 2012). Microbial cell, microbial extract or microbial extracellular polymeric substances can be used to reduce Ag+-silver nanomaterials (Park et al. 2016). But, there are some disadvantages in a typical microbial biosynthesis of silver nanomaterials. For example, it is difficult to screen silver tolerant microbe with characteristic of silver nanomaterials synthesis (Salunkhe et al. 2011). Obtaining microbial extract or extracellular polymeric substances as reductants for silver nanomaterials preparation is complex and laborious (Wei et al. 2012). So it is necessary to develop a new method for silver bionanocomposites synthesis to remove heavy metal and bacteria.

In the manuscript, a simple, rapid, eco-friendly method for silver bionanocomposites preparation has been described. When Ag+ was adsorbed on S. cerevisiae surface, in situ reduction of Ag+ to AgNPs on S. cerevisiae surface was performed by fulvic acids as reductants under simulated sunlight (Scheme S1). At the same time, S. cerevisiae was used as biosorbent for heavy metal removal. S. cerevisiae–AgNPs possessed the characteristic of antibacterial effect and kept the ability of heavy metal removal.

The synthesis of S. cerevisiae–AgNPs was performed at Hunan University of Science and Technology between January and August 2015. S. cerevisiae–AgNPs were characterized at Hunan University between January and August 2015. The antimicrobial and adsorption experiments were performed at Hunan University and Hunan University of Science and Technology in 2015–2016.

Materials and methods

Materials

Chemical reagents including K2Cr2O7, Na3AsO4, Pb(NO3)2, Cu(NO3)2, HgCl2, CdCl2, MnSO4, NiSO4, ZnSO4 and biological reagents were purchased from China National Pharmaceutical Group Corporation. S. cerevisiae was purchased from the local supermarket. E. coli was a preserved strain in our laboratory.

Instruments

The characteristics of S. cerevisiae–AgNPs were analyzed by Varian Cary300 UV–Vis spectrophotometer, Fourier transform infrared Nicolet 5700 spectrophotometer, field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM, Model S-4800) and transmission electron microscope (JEM 3010) equipped with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopic analysis (EDXA). Hg and As were measured using Agilent 200 Series AA atomic absorption spectrometer equipped with a VGA 77 AA hydride generator. Other heavy metals were measured using Hitachi Z-2000 atomic absorption spectrometer.

S. cerevisiae–AgNPs preparation

S. cerevisiae was transferred into YPD culture medium and shaken overnight at 30 °C. One hundred milliliters of S. cerevisiae culture was centrifuged at 4000 rpm and washed three times to collect cell. After 30-s vigorous vortex reaction, 100 mL of resuspended S. cerevisiae containing 2 mM AgNO3 was transferred into a beaker for 5 min stirring constantly. 0.1 g L−1 fulvic acid was added for another 5-min stirring constantly. The solution was exposed for 5 min under a CHF-XM500 xenon lamp with a parallel light source system. Centrifugation at 4000 rpm, the precipitate was collected. And the collected S. cerevisiae–AgNPs were washed three times to remove free AgNPs. S. cerevisiae–AgNPs were freeze-dried overnight and kept at 4 °C.

Bacteria killing

Escherichia coli was grown in LB broth and incubated on orbital shaker at 37 °C. The growth rate and concentration of E. coli were determined by measuring optical densities (OD) at 600 nm using UV–Vis spectrophotometer (Sreeprasad et al. 2011).

One milliliter of E. coli (OD600 = 1.51) was transferred into 150 mL LB medium containing different doses of S. cerevisiae–AgNPs (0, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100 µg mL−1). At a certain time interval, 1 mL of E. coli suspension was measured at OD600 after three times dilution using sterile water.

One milliliter of E. coli (OD600 = 1.86) was harvested by centrifugation at 4000 rpm. The collected cell was washed and resuspended using sterile water. Different doses of S. cerevisiae–AgNPs (0, 20, 40, 50, 100, 200 µg mL−1) were added. After 2-h cultivation at 37 °C, E. coli soup was diluted 105 times. One hundred microliters of E. coli diluent was spreaded and cultivated on LB plates (LB broth with 1.5% agar) at 37 °C for 24 h. E. coli colonies were counted using the colony-forming units (CFU) counting method (Wang et al. 2013). Each sample was carried out in triplicate. Photographs were recorded by Canon digital camera.

Heavy metal removal

Heavy metal adsorption experiments were performed using Cd2+ as model heavy metal in 50-mL flasks containing 2 mg mL−1 S. cerevisiae–AgNPs at 150 rpm. The effect of pH on Cd2+ adsorption was investigated at 20 m L−1 Cd2+ under different pHs varying from 4 to 6. The effect of reaction time on Cd2+ adsorption was studied at different initial Cd2+ concentrations from 10 to 80 mg L−1. Varied concentrations from 5 to 80 mg L−1 Cd2+ adsorption were explored to study adsorption isotherms.

Application of S. cerevisiae–AgNPs on simulated wastewater

After 6 h reaction using 2 mg mL−1  S. cerevisiae-AgNPs, 20 mg L−1Pb2+, Mn2+, Zn2+, Ni2+, Hg2+, Cu2+, As5+ or Cr6+ was detected. Simulated wastewater was prepared by adding heavy metals (10 mg L−1 Pb2+ and 10 mg L−1 Cd2+) and E. coli (≈4.71 × 107) to the filtered Xiangjiang river water. Heavy metals and E. coli in the simulated wastewater were treated using 2 mg mL−1 S. cerevisiae–AgNPs.

Results and discussion

Formation and characterization of S. cerevisiae–AgNPs

Biosorption is highly desirable for control of heavy metal pollution in water. S. cerevisiae has been used for heavy metal biosorption due to its advantages in high uptake, wide distribution, low cost and easy cultivation (Wang and Chen 2006). Moreover, the active groups of S. cerevisiae surface, such as hydroxyl group and carboxylic acid group, can act as binding site and nucleation site for AgNPs (Chen et al. 2014). Ag+ is adsorbed on the surface of S. cerevisiae, and the adsorbed Ag+ cannot form AgNPs in a short time (Korbekandi et al. 2016). Under simulated sunlight, Ag+ can form AgNPs by spontaneous reduction of silver facilitated by carboxylic acid groups from peptidoglycan (Nam et al. 2008), but the process takes several days. In the experiment, fulvic acids act as environmentally safe reductants to accelerate the reduction of Ag+–AgNPs under simulated sunlight (Yin et al. 2012).

The color of S. cerevisiae was changed from white to orange yellow within several minutes. The color change indicated that AgNPs were synthesized on S. cerevisiae surface. The UV–Vis spectra of S. cerevisiae–AgNPs exhibited an ultraviolet absorption peak at about 417 nm due to surface plasmon resonance of AgNPs (Fig. S1). The photographs of S. cerevisiae–AgNPs or AgNPs before and after centrifugation showed that free AgNPs cannot be centrifuged at speed of 4000 rpm, but AgNPs can be centrifuged by binding to S. cerevisiae (Fig. S2). SEM image indicated that a large number of AgNPs were distributed on S. cerevisiae surface (Fig. 1b). TEM micrograph further confirmed that AgNPs were synthesized (Fig. 1a). High-resolution TEM (HRTEM) image showed that crystalline AgNPs with the lattice distance of 0.233 nm were obtained (Yin et al. 2012; Das et al. 2013) (Fig. 1c). A characteristic peak of silver was about 3.0 keV from EDS spectrum (Fig. 1d).

Fig. 1
figure 1

TEM image (a), SEM image (b), HRTEM image (c), EDX spectrum (d) of S. cerevisiae–AgNPs

By comparing the FTIR spectra of pristine S. cerevisiae and S. cerevisiae–AgNPs, the chief compositions and structure of S. cerevisiae remained intact (Fig. 2) (Naumann 2006; Das et al. 2012; Selvakumar et al. 2011). The broad spectral feature of 3313 cm−1 resulted from N–H and O–H stretching vibration modes. The absorbance band at 1652.1 cm−1 was attributed to the C=O stretching of amide I. The combination of N–H bending mode and C–N stretch vibration mode in amide II was response to 1541.3 cm−1 frequency. A weak band at 1398.1 cm−1 was related to the symmetrical stretching vibration of C=O in COO functional groups of amino acid. The bands near 1241.8 and 1077.7 cm−1 represented amide III band components of proteins and phosphate group of lipoprotein or phospholipids, respectively. The FTIR spectrum changes of S. cerevisiae–AgNPs were observed. The shift from 3313 to 3392.6 cm−1 and the appearance of a broadening new band at 3392.6 cm−1 indicated that part of hydroxyl groups involved into AgNPs formation (Chen et al. 2014). The changes of amide I and amide II absorbance band may be a result of the roles of amide linkages in AgNPs formation (Das et al. 2012). The conversion of COO groups from 1398.1 to 1395.2 cm−1 showed that the ionized carboxyl groups play important role in the formation of AgNPs (Chen et al. 2014; Selvakumar et al. 2011). The shift of band at 1077.7 cm−1 implied that the stability of AgNPs was mediated by the phosphate group of lipoprotein (Das et al. 2012).

Fig. 2
figure 2

FTIR spectra of S. cerevisiae and S. cerevisiae–AgNPs

Antimicrobial activity of S. cerevisiae–AgNPs

In liquid culture, E. coli growth kinetics was monitored to evaluate antimicrobial activity of S. cerevisiae–AgNPs. A growth delay of E. coli was observed with increasing S. cerevisiae–AgNPs concentrations (Fig. 3a). 5 µg mL−1 of S. cerevisiae–AgNPs caused a growth delay. At dose of 60 µg mL−1, E. coli proliferated very slowly. E. coli was inhibited completely when S. cerevisiae–AgNPs concentration exceed 70 µg mL−1. Figure 3b shows the number of E. coli colonies on LB agar plates under different concentrations of S. cerevisiae–AgNPs. A vast array of E. coli colonies was observed in the absence of S. cerevisiae–AgNPs. The number of E. coli colonies was remarkably reduced under 40 or 50 µg mL−1 S. cerevisiae–AgNPs. 100% inhibition was achieved in the presence of 100 or 200 µg mL−1. Results indicated that S. cerevisiae–AgNPs could significantly restrain bacteria growth. The antibacterial property of S. cerevisiae–AgNPs is due to the large amounts of the toxic effect of AgNPs on S. cerevisiae surface.

Fig. 3
figure 3

a Growth of E. coli in LB medium containing different concentrations of S. cerevisiae–AgNPs. b The number of E. coli colonies in the presence of different concentrations of S. cerevisiae–AgNPs as a percentage of the number of E. coli colonies in the absence of S. cerevisiae–AgNPs. Inset the photographs under different concentrations of S. cerevisiae–AgNPs. A 0 µg mL−1, B 20 µg mL−1, C 40 µg mL−1, D 50 µg mL−1, E 100 µg mL−1, F 200 µg mL−1

Heavy metal biosorption of S. cerevisiae–AgNPs

Cadmium is a common kind of heavy metal that is most harmful to environment and human health (Clares et al. 2015). Cd2+ was chosen as model heavy metal to study heavy metal biosorption in the study. The influences of pH on Cd2+ removal were studied in Fig. S3. With the increase in pH value, removal efficiency was gradually improved. Higher adsorption at pH 6 could be due to the stronger electrostatic attraction between the negatively charged cell surface and the positively charged Cd2+.

The effects of contact time on Cd2+ adsorption were investigated (Fig. S4). The adsorption was very fast in the first few minutes, followed closely by the slow adsorption. The kinetics of Cd2+ uptake showed that the adsorption can be divided into two processes: the rapid beginning followed by the slow phase. The pseudo second-order kinetic model was used to study Cd2+ adsorption kinetics (Table 1). The calculated qe values were proved to be close to the experimental qe values. The correlation coefficient values (R 2) were close to 1. As shown in Fig. 4, the adsorption kinetics of Cd2+ can be well described by pseudo second-order kinetic model based on the assumption that the rate-limiting step may be chemical adsorption involving valence forces through sharing or exchange of electrons (Belala et al. 2011; Chen and Wang 2010).

Table 1 Parameters of pseudo second-order kinetic model for Cd2+ adsorption on S. cerevisiae–AgNPs
Fig. 4
figure 4

Second-order adsorption kinetics of different concentrations of Cd2+

Langmuir model and Freundlich model were described to simulate Cd2+ adsorption (Wang and Chen 2006; Ali et al. 2016c). Langmuir isotherm model presented a better fit to depict Cd2+ uptake on S. cerevisiae–AgNPs, as shown in Fig. 5, and the results showed that S. cerevisiae binding to AgNPs does not lose the removal ability of adsorbent for heavy metal and monolayer adsorption takes place on S. cerevisiae–AgNPs surface (Selvakumar et al. 2011). There was a little difference on adsorption capacity between S. cerevisiae and S. cerevisiae–AgNPs (Table 2). The Cd2+ adsorption capacity of S. cerevisiae–AgNPs was weakened, because adsorption sites of S. cerevisiae surface were occupied by AgNPs. The chief compositions and structure of S. cerevisiae–AgNPs were not altered. The functional groups still exist on S. cerevisiae surface, which would help S. cerevisiae–AgNPs to adsorb heavy metal. S. cerevisiae–AgNPs retained the ability of heavy metal removal.

Fig. 5
figure 5

a Langmuir and b Freundlich isotherm model for Cd2+ adsorption on S. cerevisiae or S. cerevisiae–AgNPs

Table 2 Parameters of Langmuir and Freundlich for Cd2+ adsorption on S. cerevisiae or S. cerevisiae–AgNPs

Application of S. cerevisiae–AgNPs on simulated wastewater

In order to improve the applications of this method in water treatment, adsorption experiments for various heavy metals were performed (Table 3). The removal efficiency for Pb2+, Cu2+, Hg2+, Zn2+, Mn2+, Ni2+, Cr6+ and As5+ was 91.75, 43.58, 19.72, 22.56, 22.53, 12.47, 6.25 and 9.65%, respectively. High removal efficiency for Pb2+ was achieved due to Pb2+ as soft ion (Chen and Wang 2010). Low removal efficiency for Cr6+ or As5+ could be relevant to electrostatic repulsion between the negatively charged Cr2O7 2− or AsO4 3− and the negatively charged S. cerevisiae–AgNPs. The simulated wastewater containing E. coli, Cd2+ and Pb2+ was treated using S. cerevisiae–AgNPs (Table 4). After 30-min reaction, E. coli cannot be detected; the removal efficiency for Pb2+ reached 90.56%, for Cd2+ reached 78%. The results showed that S. cerevisiae–AgNPs could be used to treat practical wastewater. Various adsorbents including inorganic nanomaterials, organic biomaterials for the removal of heavy metal or bacteria from aqueous systems were studied (Table S1). Although it is not always possible to make direct comparisons between different adsorbents in terms of pollutants removal from water, these adsorbents obviously cannot be used to remove both heavy metal and bacteria. S. cerevisiae–AgNPs possess the ability of removing both heavy metal and bacteria.

Table 3 Removal percentage of different kinds of heavy metals by S. cerevisiae–AgNPs
Table 4 Concentration changes of E. coli, Cd and Pb in the simulated contaminated water using S. cerevisiae–AgNPs

Conclusion

A simple, rapid, environmentally friendly method for S. cerevisiae–AgNPs synthesis was developed to remove pollutants from water. This method can avoid high cost, complicated synthesis process and environmentally unfriendly chemistry reagent. More importantly, the antibacterial S. cerevisiae–AgNPs have good capacity of removing heavy metal. The present method will provide new insight into water treatment by bionanocomposites.