Introduction

Chalcone (1, 3-diaryl-2-propene-1-one) is an important group of organic compounds found in some plants or prepared synthetically [1,2,3]. Chalcones are aromatic ketones belonging to the flavonoid family [4, 5]. Chalcones are of great importance in biochemistry, and they are the starting material of many important biological compounds [6,7,8]. They have important properties and wide biological activities [9] such as anti-fungal, antiviral, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory effects and anti-depressant activities, anti-cancer properties, anti-tubercular, anti-hyperglycemic agents [10,11,12,13], good antibacterial effects [14], and enzyme inhibitory properties [15, 16].

Commonly chalcone is obtained from the Claisen–Schmidt condensation between acetophenone and benzaldehyde [7, 17] in the presence of a base catalyst that is one of the important strategies for the development of carbon–carbon bonding [15]. Generally, alkaline hydroxides [18] are used as the homogeneous catalysts for this synthesis, which have many disadvantages [19]. Recently, due to the assumption of greener technologies for the synthesis of compounds, solid base catalysts are preferred over homogeneous ones. These catalysts have excellent activity and can be easily separated, revived, and reused [17, 20, 21].

Solid base catalysts have many different types, such as alkaline earth oxides and hydroxides, mixed oxides, clays, zeolites, hydrotalcites, etc. [22, 23]. Among the heterogeneous base catalysts, hydrotalcites are one of the most important ones due to their numerous applications. They are easily synthesized, have low cost, have a large surface area, and are widely used as base catalysts [24,25,26]. Hydrotalcites (HT), called layered double hydroxides (LDHs), have recently attracted much notice as new environmentally friendly catalysts [24, 27]. Reactions such as using LDH for biodiesel synthesis [22] and steam reforming of biomass [25], Claisen–Schmidt condensation [4, 28], Aldol condensation [29], Knoevenagel condensation [30], and Baeyer–Villiger oxidation of cyclohexanone to ε-caprolactone has been done [31].

LDHs can be depicted by the common formula: [M2+1 − xM3+x (OH)2]x+. An−x/n. zH2O [32], where M2+ represents divalent metal cations, M3+ represents trivalent metal cations, and An represents interspersed anions with charge n [32,33,34], so that water and anions are placed between the layers [28, 35]. X = M3+/(M2+ + M3+) the molar ratio for most hydrotalcites is about 0.2 until 0.33 [25, 36]. Various arrangements of divalent and trivalent cations have been used in the synthesis of LDHs that show many remarkable properties such as good basic character, vast surface area, thermally stable dispersion of metal ion components, high homogeneity, and contributory effects displayed between the elements [25, 37]. All divalent metals such as Co, Ca, Mg, Cd, Fe, Zn, and Ni form LDHs [38, 39]. LDHs prepared with Ca2+ cations have a low price, are non-toxic, have significant basic properties, and have very effective catalytic activity in many reactions. Mixed metal oxides derived from LDH precursors show good properties. During the calcination of LDH precursors hydroxyl groups are removed the interlayer structure of metal oxides and crystal shape are changed, causing an increase in specific surface area, expansion of mesoporosity, thermal stability, strong alkalinity, and enhanced adsorption capacity [28, 40,41,42,43].

In this work, we have prepared a new, recyclable, and deeply effective catalyst in the synthesis of chalcones under easy and green conditions using the Claisen–Schmidt condensation reaction. For this purpose, we synthesized and compared a series of M–Ca–Al (M = Sr, Ni, Cd, and Co) (with (M2+ + Ca2+)/Al3+ = 3) mixed metal oxides derived from LDH precursors as the heterogeneous solid base catalysts and they were used in chalcone synthesis via Claisen–Schmidt condensation between acetophenone and benzaldehyde as a model of C–C bond formation reaction. For the first time, we want to investigate how adding small amounts of other divalent cations (M2+) to the usual hydrotalcite-like (Ca–Al) sample so that the ratio of divalent to trivalent cation remains constant affects the structure, basicity, and activity of the catalyst in the condensation reaction. All catalysts were characterized with FT-IR, FESEM, CO2-TPD, BET, and XRD techniques, and the Hammett indicator method to investigate the relationship between catalytic performance, structure, and basicity of catalysts.

Experimental

Materials

Ethanol [C2H5OH (99%)], double deionized water (DDW), Ni(NO3)2.6H2O (99%), Sr(NO3)2.4H2O (99%), Co(NO3)2.6H2O(97%), Cd(NO3)2.4H2O (99%), Na2CO3(> 99%), Ca(NO3)2.4H2O (> 99%), Al(NO3)3.9H2O (98.5%), benzaldehyde [C6H5CHO(98%)], and acetophenone [C6H5C(O)CH3(99%)] were purchased from Merck Company. Ethanol [C2H5OH (96%)] was purchased from JATA Co.

Preparation of hydrotalcite-like catalysts

The hydrotalcite-like catalysts were synthesized by the co-precipitation method [22, 44]. In a typical method for the preparation of the Ca–Sr–Al hydrotalcite catalyst with (Ca + Sr)/Al molar ratio of (2.5 + 0.5)/1, at first, the solution of Na2CO3 (0.75 M) (solution A) and the common solution of Ca(NO3)2.4H2O, Sr(NO3)2.4H2O, and Al (NO3)3.9H2O were prepared in deionized water (solution B). Then, both solutions were simultaneously poured into 50 mL of deionized water accompanied with vigorous mechanical stirring, maintaining the pH 10 at 65  °C. The blend was stirred vigorously for 20 h, then filtered and washed with deionized water several times to bring the pH to about 7–8. The precipitates were dried in an oven at 80 °C for 20 h and then calcined under airflow at 850 °C for 5 h. Also, calcined samples of hydrotalcite-like catalysts with the molar ratio of M2+/M3+ = 3/1 such as Ca3Al, Ni3Al, Cd3Al, Sr3Al, Co3Al, Sr0.125Ca2.875Al, Sr0.25Ca2.75Al, Sr0.75Ca2.25Al, Cd0.5Ca2.5Al, Co0.5Ca2.5Al, and Ni0.5Ca2.5Al were synthesized with this method.

Catalyst characterization

FESEM images were taken with a TESCAN instrument model MIRA III. The energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) of samples was also recorded with this device. BET surface area of the catalytic samples from the nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms was recorded in the BELSORP MINI II device. The samples were degassed for 2 h at 300 °C before measurement. The alkalinity of the catalysts was evaluated by CO2-TPD (Carbon dioxide temperature programmed desorption). A Micromeritics instrument (model Chemisorb 2750) was used for CO2-TPD within a temperature range of 100–1000 °C under helium flow (20 mL min−1) and released CO2 was detected by a TCD detector. X-ray diffraction (XRD) was utilized to investigate the structure of the catalysts. A Philips diffractometer was used to generate the diffraction patterns with Cu Kα radiation (Model PW 1800). The basicity of the catalysts was evaluated by CO2-TPD (carbon dioxide temperature programmed desorption). A Micromeritics instrument (model Chemisorb 2750) was used for CO2-TPD under helium flow (20 mL min−1) in the temperature range of 100–1000 °C, and released CO2 was detected by a TCD detector. FT-IR spectra of catalysts were obtained using KBr pellets on a BRUKERALPHA FT-IR spectrometer.

The Hammett indicator method was utilized to determine the alkaline strength of the synthesized catalysts. According to the procedure of our previous articles [45] para nitroaniline (H_ = 18.4), alizarin yellow R (H_ = 11.0), 4-chloro-2-nitroaniline (H_ = 17.7), 2, 4-dinitroaniline (H_ = 15.0), and phenolphthalein (H_ = 9.8) Hammett indicators are used in our tests.

Catalytic tests and activity evaluation

The reaction was done in the liquid phase in a batch reactor consisting of a round bottom flask with two necks, a sampling apparatus, and a condenser. According to Scheme 1, a typical reaction mixture containing acetophenone (10 mmol), benzaldehyde (12 mmol), and ethanol as a solvent was heated in an oil bath to 60 °C. Then, 0.04 wt% (0.09 g) of the catalyst was added to the flask after reaching the desired temperature. The reaction mixture was stirred at a rate of 1200 cycles/min with a magnetic stirrer for 6 h. The reaction process was checked with TLC.

Scheme 1
scheme 1

Preparation of chalcone

After the completion of the reaction, the catalyst was separated from the hot reaction mixture by filtration. Then, the reaction mixture was cooled to 20 °C and the solid product (chalcone) was separated from the blend by filtration. The remaining solution was injected into a GC (Perkin Elmer 8500) with an FID detector and 3% DEXIL 300 column to determine the amount of residual benzaldehyde. The conversion percentage was calculated based on benzaldehyde in the final reaction mixture according to the following equation:

$${\text{Conversion}}\;\left( \% \right) \, = \frac{{{\text{moles }}\;{\text{of}}\;{\text{benzaldehyde}}\;{\text{reacted}}}}{{{\text{Initial }}\;{\text{moles }}\;{\text{of }}\;{\text{benzaldehyde}}}} \times 100$$
(1)

The chalcone product was separated from the reaction mixture (at 20 °C), recrystallized by the two-solvent (hot ethanol and cold H2O) method, and weighed [13, 46].

Melting point technique, FT-IR(BRUKERALPHA), 13C-NMR, and 1H-NMR (BRUKER-AVANCe 300 NMR-300 MHz Spectrometry) spectra were used to identify chalcone compounds. The yield % of the product was calculated as follows:

$${\text{Yield}}\;\left( \% \right) \, = \frac{{{\text{Amount }}\;{\text{of}}\;{\text{ produced }}\;{\text{chalcone}}}}{{{\text{Theoritical }}\;{\text{value}}}} \times 100$$
(2)

Results and discussion

Catalysts characterization

XRD

The X-ray diffraction patterns of the two-component M/Al (M: Ca, Ni, Cd, Co, and Sr) with M2+/Al3+ = 3/1 and three-component M/Ca/Al (M: Ni, Cd, Co, and Sr) HT-like catalyst samples with (M2+  + Ca2+)/Al3+ = 3/1 molar ratio after calcination are shown in Fig. 1. Also, the XRD pattern of Ca3Al sample before calcination is reported in Fig. 1a. This pattern is related to peaks of CaCO3, Al(OH)3, and Ca(OH)2 phases according to standard cards (00-041-1475, 01-074-1119, 00-044-1481) which confirm the hydrotalcite-like structure of Ca3Al before calcination [24, 47]. According to Fig. 1, results showed that the calcined hydrotalcites are of relatively high crystallinity which agrees with the previous studies [40,41,42]. In all the calcined samples, the XRD pattern of calcium oxide was clearly observed, and the diffraction peaks at 2θ: 32.33, 37.38, 53.78, 64.1, and 67.29° were related to the presence of CaO phase according to the standard card (01-077-2376) [47, 48]. Also, the peaks were attributed to the Ca(OH)2 phase in 2θ: 17.96, and 34 were identified in the Sr/Ca/Al and Co0.5Ca2.5Al samples according to the standard card (00-044-1481) [47, 48]. There is no diffraction line for the alumina phases. Al3+ cations can be completely incorporated into the CaO framework or may form an amorphous AlOx phase. The presence of aluminum in the structure of HT-like catalytic samples causes a change in the reflection to a higher 2θ [47]. Also, in the two-component M/Al samples, the NiO, CdO, and Co3O4 phases were observed according to standard cards (01-1239), (01-075-0596), and (74-1656), respectively [49].

Fig. 1
figure 1

XRD patterns of the catalyst samples: a Ca3Al before calcination and Ca3Al, Co0.5Ca2.5Al, Co3Al after calcination b Ca3Al, Cd0.5Ca2.5Al, Cd3Al, c Ca3Al, Ni0.5Ca2.5Al, Ni3Al, d Ca3Al, Sr0.25Ca2.75Al, Sr0.5Ca2.5Al, Sr0.75Ca2.25Al, Sr3Al after calcinations

But in the containing strontium samples, peaks related to SrO, SrAl2O4, and Sr(OH)2 phases are observed according to standard cards (00-006-0520) and (00-027-0847), respectively. As the amount of strontium in the samples increases, these peaks become sharper, and the peaks related to calcium oxide decrease. The peaks related to the SrAl2O4 phase at 2θ: 20.1, 22.8, 29.4, 35.2, 46.45, and 57.68 degrees were determined according to the standard card (00-034-0379). The average crystal size of these catalyst samples was calculated from X-ray diffraction using Scherer’s equation, which is reported in Table 1. Also, the XRD pattern of the Sr0.5Ca2.5Al sample before calcination (Fig. was not reported) confirms the hydrotalcite-like structure and shows the peaks related to calcium carbonate, strontium carbonate, (Sr, Ca)CO3, Sr(OH)2 and Al(OH)3 phases according to standard cards (01-086-2341, 01-071-2393, 00-044-1421, 01-074-1119). In the Sr0.5Ca2.5Al sample after calcination, the peaks related to carbonate phases are completely lost and only some peaks related to Sr(OH)2 are observed.

Table 1 Textural properties of catalyst samples

FT-IR

The FT-IR spectra of the Ca3Al catalyst before and after calcination at 750 °C are shown in Fig. 2a. The FT-IR spectra of the sample before calcination confirm the hydrotalcite-like structure and show water molecules in the structure of the catalyst with peaks in the range of 3630–3430 cm−1, which belongs to O–H stretching vibrations. Also, the presence of a peak in the region of 3700 cm−1 indicates the OH group and the presence of metal hydroxide. A wide and strong peak is also observed in the area of 1887–1384 cm−1, which belongs to the carbonate group. In the FT-IR spectra of the Ca3Al sample after calcination (Fig. 2a and b), the intensity of this peak is reduced and the peak related to H2O stretching vibrations disappeared. The FT-IR spectra of all catalysts show that peaks are observed in the 3643 cm−1 region related to the OH group which remains inter layers of HT samples after calcination [50]. Also, in the range of 500–1000 cm−1 peaks related to metal oxides are observed (Fig. 2b) [51, 52].

Fig. 2
figure 2

a FT-IR of Ca3Al catalyst before and after calcination at 750 °C b FT-IR of Ca3Al and M0.5Ca2.5Al catalysts (M: Ni, Cd, Co, and Sr) after calcination

BET and BJH analysis

To determine the porosity and the structural properties of catalysts, the BET technique was used for all samples, and the results are presented in Fig. 3. According to Fig. 3a, the adsorption–desorption isotherm of the Co0.5Ca2.5Al sample corresponds to type II and H2 hysteresis loop which is related to micropores materials with poorly adsorbed-adsorbent interaction. The Ni0.5Ca2.5Al sample isotherm is approximately type V or (IV) with an H3 hysteresis loop in the range of 0.4–1 P/P°, indicating mesoporous structures and strip pores. Other catalysts show a mixture of type V and type II isotherms with an H2 and H3 hysteresis loop in the range of 0.75–1 P/P°, which confirms the presence of microporous-mesoporous structures. Also, Fig. 3b determines the pore size distribution profiles of the catalytic samples using the BJH method. As it is clear from Fig. 3b, the pore size distribution profiles of Ca3Al and Co0.5Ca2.5Al samples are different compared to other samples and the pore size (rp) corresponding to the maximum of curves is about 1.2 nm. Also, the average pore size of Ca3Al is about 5.9414 nm and it has increased with the introduction of the third metal.

Fig. 3
figure 3

a The absorption and desorption diagram, obtained from the BET analysis of Ca3Al and M0.5Ca2.5Al catalysts (M: Ni, Cd, Co, and Sr) after calcination, b BJH plot of synthesized catalysts

The values of BET surface areas, pore volumes, and pore diameters of Ca3Al, Sr0.5Ca2.5Al, Cd0.5Ca2.5Al, Co0.5Ca2.5Al, and Ni0.5Ca2.5Al calcined HT-like catalysts are reported in Table 1. According to Table 1, the surface area of the Ca3Al sample is 39 m2/g, which is in good agreement with the surface values for calcined HT samples reported in the literature [53]. Table 1 funds that replacing a small amount of calcium with another divalent metal has caused a decrease in the BET surface area so that the Co0.5Ca2.5Al sample has the lowest surface area (6 m2/g). Also, the total pore volumes of catalyst samples are about 0.04–0.17 cm3 g−1 and the nickel-containing catalyst has the largest pore volume.

FESEM and EDS

The FESEM images of all catalytic samples are given in Fig. 4, in order to compare the morphology of the prepared catalysts. According to Fig. 4, the morphology of the catalyst samples has changed significantly with the replacement of the divalent cations. FESEM results also show the agglomerated nanoparticles with a size of 30–52 nm which is consistent with the data from the XRD pattern.

Fig. 4
figure 4

FESEM images of the catalysts: a Sr0.5Ca2.5Al, b Cd0.5Ca2.5Al, c Ni0.5Ca2.5Al, d Co0.5Ca2.5Al, e Ca3Al after calcination

Also, the XDS analysis was utilized to determine the chemical composition of the surface of catalyst samples (Fig. 5, Table 2). The results show that the percentage composition of the elements on the surface of the catalyst is almost the same as the bulk and confirms the homogeneity of the percentage composition in the whole sample.

Fig. 5
figure 5

EDS spectroscopy of the catalyst samples: a Sr0.5Ca2.5Al, b Cd0.5Ca2.5Al, c Ni0.5Ca2.5Al, d Co0.5Ca2.5Al, e Ca3Al after calcination

Table 2 Comparison of the M2+/Al3+molar ratio theoretical and experimental

Mapping analysis was used to determine the abundance of Sr, Ca, and Al elements on the surface of the Sr0.5Ca2.5Al catalyst and the scatter map of element distribution, the results of which are shown in Fig. 6. Based on that, the distribution of elements on the surface is uniform and homogeneous, and accumulation is not seen.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Mapping of Sr0.5Ca2.5Al catalyst after calcination

CO 2 -TPD

In order to evaluate the surface basic strength and determine the number of alkaline sites on the surface of the prepared catalysts, the CO2-TPD technique was used for all samples after calcination, the results of which are shown in Fig. 7 and Table 3. In general, in the CO2-TPD profiles, the number of peaks, the areas of peaks, and the position of peaks indicate the number of alkaline sites, the types of alkaline sites, and the strength of basic sites, respectively. Therefore, we can classify basic sites as medium, strong, and stronger sites according to the maximum desorption temperature of the desorption peaks. According to Fig. 7, the calcined Ca3Al HT-like sample shows two CO2 desorption peaks at around 426 and 720 °C, which indicates strong basic sites corresponding to Ca2+–O2− pairs. Also, calcined Ni0.5Ca2.5Al and Cd0.5Ca2.5Al samples, like sample Ca3Al, show peaks with maximum temperatures of 563 °C, 727 °C, and 497 °C, 736 °C, respectively, which are related to strong alkaline sites. According to Fig. 7, the calcined Co0.5Ca2.5Al HT-like sample has two peaks at maximum temperatures of 246 and 716 °C, which correspond to medium and strong basic sites, respectively.

Fig. 7
figure 7

CO2-TPD of Ca3Al and M0.5Ca2.5Al catalysts (M: Ni, Cd, Co, and Sr) after calcination

Table 3 Claisen–Schmidt condensation reaction and basic properties of the synthesized catalysts

For the calcined Sr0.5Ca2.5Al HT-like sample, three desorption peaks have appeared at 497, 687, and 882 °C which peaks are related to strong and stronger base sites, respectively. According to XRD results (Fig. 1), the calcined sample content CaO, Sr(OH)2, SrO, and SrAl2O4 phases. In this sample, the peaks corresponding to the temperatures of 497 and 687 °C match to basic sites of Sr(OH)2 and CaO components, which have shifted from 426 to 497 °C and 720 to 678 °C due to the interaction with the other components. It seems that the desorption peaks at higher temperatures in the range of 700–850 °C are related to SrO and SrAl2O4 phases. The peak with a maximum temperature of 800 is related to the isolated oxygen species [54].

Hammett indicator method

In order to evaluate the basic strengths (H_) of, Ca3Al, Ni0.5Ca2.5Al, Cd0.5Ca2.5Al, Co0.5Ca2.5Al, Sr0.125Ca2.875Al, Sr0.25Ca2.75Al, Sr0.5Ca2.5Al, and Sr0.75Ca2.25Al HT-like catalysts, the Hammett indicator procedure was also used, the results of which are shown in Table 3. In this experiment, the mixture of solid base sample and methanol was titrated by benzoic acid in the presence of indicators. In the Hammett method, catalysts with weaker alkaline strength than the strongest indicators do not change color, but catalysts with stronger alkaline strength than the weakest indicators change color [24]. From Table 3, it was found that Ca3Al, Ni0.5Ca2.5Al, and Cd0.5Ca2.5Al catalysts changed color in the presence of all indicators except for para nitroaniline and 4-chloro-2-nitroaniline. The Co0.5Ca2.5Al catalyst changed color with phenolphthalein and alizarin yellow R, but did not change color with 2,4-dinitroaniline, 4- chloro-2-nitroaniline, and para nitroaniline. Catalysts containing strontium did not change color with phenolphthalein, and para nitroaniline. Also, the bimetallic catalysts of Ni3Al, Cd3Al, and Co3Al did not change color with these alkaline reagents and could not be investigated by this method. Therefore, the alkaline strength (H_) of the Ca3Al, Ni0.5Ca2.5Al, and Cd0.5Ca2.5Al, catalyst samples could be empirically denoted as 9.8 < H_ < 17.7. The basic strength of Sr3Al, Sr0.125Ca2.875Al, Sr0.25Ca2.75Al, Sr0.5Ca2.5Al, Sr0.75Ca2.25Al, and Co0.5Ca2.5Al could be empirically denoted as 11 < H_ < 18.4 and 9.8 < H_ < 15, respectively.

Catalytic performance

To evaluate the catalytic performance of calcined HT-like samples, the Claisen–Schmidt condensation reaction between acetophenone and benzaldehyde for the chalcone synthesis was studied as a model of the C–C bond formation reaction. The results are given in Table 3. According to the analysis of the 1H-NMR spectra of the reaction product (spectra not shown), only the trans-chalcone configuration (E isomer) was obtained. Therefore, the percentage of selectivity in all runs was 100%. According to Table 3, the chalcone synthesis reaction was carried out in the presence of bimetallic calcined HT compounds such as Ca3Al, Sr3Al, Cd3Al, Ni3Al, and Co3Al and trimetallic calcined hydrotalcite catalysts after calcination, and in the absence of a catalyst. According to Table 3, in the absence of a catalyst, benzaldehyde conversion (%) was very little. Also, the Ca3Al was the most efficient among the binary catalysts and the lowest product was obtained in the presence of the Co3Al sample. In the presence of a calcined binary Ca3Al HT-like sample, the yield (%) of chalcone was 61% (conversion 65.1(%)) and the yield (%) of chalcone in the presence of the Co0.5Ca2.5Al catalyst decreased to 38% (conversion 38.2(%)). In the presence of Ni0.5Ca2.5Al and Cd0.5Ca2.5Al catalysts, the yield (%)/conversion (%) have changed to 70.1/72, and 79.8/80.2%, respectively. Also, in the presence of the Sr0.5Ca2.5Al catalyst yield (%) and conversion (%) have changed to 87.1% and 89.1, respectively. It seems that the replacement of calcium by cobalt has caused a decrease in the yield (%), and the replacement of calcium by Ni, Cd, and Sr, has caused an increase in the yield (%) of chalcone. To justify the difference in the performance of the synthesized catalysts, the results of CO2-TPD analysis obtained from the area of the corresponding peaks (calculated using Origin Pro software) are shown in Table 3. According to Table 3, the synthesized catalysts in three temperature ranges: Tmax < 550 °C, 550 °C < Tmax < 750 °C, and 750 °C < Tmax < 950 °C show the CO2 desorption peaks (mmol CO2.g−1) which are related to medium, strong, and stronger basic sites. The Ca3Al and Co0.5Ca2.5Al catalysts do have not any stronger basic sites and for this reason, in their presence, the yield (%) of the chalcone is lower than other samples. Also, according to the results in Table 1, the BET surface area of the Co0.5Ca2.5Al sample (6.2 m2.g−1) is much lower than the Ca3Al surface area (39.4 m2.g−1) and has caused to decrease in the yield (%) of chalcone. According to Table 3, activity, yield (%) of chalcone, and conversion % of benzaldehyde in the presence of Ni0.5Ca2.5Al, Cd0.5Ca2.5Al, and Sr0.5Ca2.5Al catalyst samples have increased with the increase in the stronger basic site. These results indicate that the catalytic activity is strongly related to the number of stronger basic sites and the activity value of more alkaline catalysts is higher than others. Therefore, the Sr0.5Ca2.5Al catalyst has more millimoles of stronger basic sites (1.27 mmol CO2.g−1) than the other samples and therefore has more activity in this reaction. Also, in Table 3, the effect of the Sr/Ca molar ratio on the activity of Sr-containing catalyst samples was investigated. The samples of Sr0.125Ca2.875Al, Sr0.25Ca2.75Al, and Sr0.75Ca2.25Al have shown almost the same catalytic activity compared to the Sr0.5Ca2.5Al sample. Therefore, the Sr0.5Ca2.5Al sample was chosen as a suitable solid base catalyst and used in further investigations. The performance of Sr0.5Ca2.5Al HT-like before calcination also is given in Table 3. The results showed that this catalyst had a lower catalytic performance in this reaction compared to the mixed oxide sample obtained from it (after calcination). It was not completely stable and slightly dissolved in the reaction mixture causing leaching. In fact, based on the characterization results, the replacement of calcium by Ni, Cd, or Sr in the structure of calcined binary Ca3Al HT-like catalyst, produces significant changes in basic strength, phase composition, morphology, and textural properties. So that Sr0.5Ca2.5Al sample with CO2 desorption peak in the temperature range of 750 °C < Tmax < 950 °C, contains very strong alkaline sites and phase composition of SrO, SrAl2O4, and Sr(OH)2. The collection of these alterations should be caused by the observed difference in activity. Therefore, the Sr0.5Ca2.5Al sample has an acceptable performance in this reaction and was used as a suitable base catalyst in further detailed studies.

Effect of calcination temperature on the activity of the catalyst

Since suitable active sites are created in the catalyst during the calcination, this process is of special importance and the calcination conditions should be investigated experimentally. Figure 8 shows the yield (%) of chalcone produced in the presence of the Sr0.5Ca2.5Al catalyst with different calcination temperatures (550–1050 °C) within 5 h. According to Fig. 8, the chalcone yield (%) is low in the presence of calcined Sr0.5Ca2.5Al at 550 °C, and enhancement of the calcination temperature)550–850 °C( has increased the chalcone yield (%) to 90%. But by raising the temperature to 1050 °C, the yield (%) of chalcone has decreased. Therefore, the calcination conditions (850 °C, 5 h) are appropriate for Sr0.5Ca2.5Al HT-like catalyst due to the complete decomposition of precursor and the production of crystalline phases of SrO, CaO, and SrAl2O4 and the yield (%) of chalcone is maximum. In the 850–1050 °C temperature range, the crystalline phases of the catalyst sample may have been agglomerated due to the sintering effect.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Effect of calcination temperature. Reaction conditions: 0.04 wt% of Sr0.5Ca2.5Al catalyst, 5 mL solvent (ethanol 96%), reaction time 6 h, benzaldehyde/acetophenone: 1.2, and reaction temperature 60 °C

Effect of the amount of catalyst

To investigate the effect of the amount of catalyst on the yield (%) of chalcone, the reactions were carried out in the presence of calcined Sr0.5Ca2.5Al in the range of 0.009–0.05% (based on the mass of total raw material) at 60 °C for 6 h, benzaldehyde/acetophenone: 1.2, and 5 mL solvent (ethanol 96%). Also, the reaction was carried out without a catalyst which did not have significant efficiency. The results in Fig. 9a show that by increasing the amount of catalyst up to 0.04%, the yield (%) of the product increases to 87% and after that, the yield (%) decreases with a further increase in the catalyst amount. At first, by increasing the catalyst amount, the number of accessible active sites has increased therefore, the yield (%) of chalcone has increased. The reaction rate depends on the external surface. However, above 0.04 wt% (0.09 g), the diffusion rate of the raw material toward the catalyst surface decreases, and therefore, the reaction rate is limited by external diffusion. The above results indicated the optimum catalyst amount is around 0.04 wt% (0.09 g).

Fig. 9
figure 9

a Effect of the amount of catalyst. aYield of pure isolated chalcone. Reaction conditions: Sr0.5Ca2.5Al calcined at 850 °C as the catalyst, 5 mL solvent (ethanol 96%), reaction time 6 h, benzaldehyde/acetophenone molar ratio: 1.2, and reaction temperature 60 °C. b Effect of molar ratio of raw materials. Reaction conditions: 0.04 wt% of Sr0.5Ca2.5Al HT-like calcined at 850 °C as the catalyst, reaction time 6 h, 5 mL solvent (ethanol 96%), and reaction temperature 60 °C

Effect of molar ratio of raw materials

To evaluate the effect of raw materials’ molar ratio on the yield (%) of chalcone, many experiments in the presence of calcined Sr0.5Ca2.5Al catalyst with different molar ratios of benzaldehyde/acetophenone were performed. The reactions were carried out at 60 °C for 6 h using 0.09 g of Sr0.5Ca2.5Al catalyst, 5 mL of solvent (ethanol 96%), and five different molar ratios of benzaldehyde/acetophenone in the range of 0.5–2. According to Fig. 9b, by increasing the molar ratio of benzaldehyde to acetophenone up to 1.2, the yield (%) of chalcone, has also increased. But increasing more than that has not had much effect on the yield percentage. Therefore, 1.2 was chosen as the optimal molar ratio.

Effect of reaction temperature

The reaction was carried out under different temperatures (20–80 °C) in the presence of Sr0.5Ca2.5Al calcined catalyst to check the effect of temperature change on the reaction. The reactions were performed with 0.09 g of catalyst, 1.2 of benzaldehyde/acetophenone molar ratio, 6 h reaction time, and 5 mL of solvent (ethanol 96%). The results in Fig. 10a show that raising the temperature up to 60 °C improved the chalcone yield (%). After this temperature, the yield (%) of chalcone has decreased to a small amount may be due to the production of side products. Therefore, the proper temperature for this reaction system is around 60 °C.

Fig. 10
figure 10

a Effect of reaction temperature. Reaction conditions: 0.09 g of Sr0.5Ca2.5Al HT-like calcined at 850 °C as the catalyst, 5 mL solvent (ethanol 96%), benzaldehyde/acetophenone: 1.2 molar ratios, and reaction time 6 h. b Effect of reaction time. Reaction conditions: 0.04 wt% of Sr0.5Ca2.5Al HT-like calcined at 850 °C as the catalyst, 5 mL solvent (ethanol 96%), benzaldehyde/acetophenone: 1.2 molar ratios, and reaction temperature 60 °C

Effect of reaction time

To determine the minimum time required for the condensation reaction between acetophenone and benzaldehyde to achieve the highest yield (%) of chalcone, the effect of reaction time was, studied. The reactions were carried out in the presence of 0.09 g of Sr0.5Ca2.5Al HT-like calcined at 850 °C as the catalyst, using 5 mL of solvent (ethanol 96%), reaction temperature 60 °C, 1.2 molar ratios of benzaldehyde/acetophenone, and reaction time in the range of 2–24 h. According to Fig. 10b, increasing the reaction time up to 6 h has increased the yield (%) of chalcone to the maximum value of 87%, and above this time, the yield (%) of chalcone remained almost constant. Therefore, the equilibrium time of 6 h is suitable for the desired reaction.

Effect of solvents

To evaluate the solvent effect on the yield (%) of chalcone, many experiments were performed with various solvents while the other conditions (0.09 g of the Sr0.5Ca2.5Al catalyst, benzaldehyde/acetophenone: 1.2 molar ratios, reaction temperature 60 °C, reaction time 6 h) have remained the same (see Table 4). Initially, the reaction was performed under solvent-free conditions and did not progress significantly. Also, the reaction did not progress much under a non-polar solvent. Then, polar green solvents of water and ethanol mixture with different (V/V) ratios were used for this reaction. According to Table 4, the reaction in the presence of ethanol had a better efficiency, and ethanol with 96% purity had a better than 99%. It was found that a very small amount of water is useful to advance the reaction. Also, doubling and tripling the amount of solvent does not have a great effect on increasing the yield of chalcone production, so, 5 mL of 96% ethanol is suitable for this reaction.

Table 4 Effect of solvent on the Claisen–Schmidt condensation reaction between acetophenone and benzaldehyde in the presence of Sr0.5Ca2.5Al HT-like catalyst

Catalyst reusability

For reusability study, after the reaction was completed, the Sr0.5Ca2.5Al calcined catalyst was separated from the reaction blend, washed several times with ethanol, and carefully dried in the oven to reuse the catalyst in the reaction and also to study its lifetime and stability. According to Table 5, the Sr0.5Ca2.5Al HT-like catalyst has been used up to four times in the reaction, while about 2% of the yield (%) of chalcone has decreased. The X-ray diffraction profiles and FT-IR analysis were taken from the recycled catalyst after being used up to four times (See Fig. 11). These results show that the Sr0.5Ca2.5Al HT-like catalyst is completely stable and has preserved its structure.

Table 5 Reused of the recovered catalyst
Fig. 11
figure 11

a FT-IR, and b XRD pattern of Sr0.5Ca2.5Al HT-like catalyst after calcination, and after recycling

Claisen–Schmidt condensation reaction on different catalytic systems

Claisen–Schmidt condensation reaction with acetophenone and benzaldehyde on different catalytic systems is given in Table 6. As it can be seen, the Sr0.5Ca2.5Al HT-like catalyst, while being simple and cheap, has high activity in the reaction under mild conditions, and it can be seen that this catalyst has a catalytic activity comparable to other catalytic systems, therefore, this catalytic system is suitable for Claisen–Schmidt condensation. Other catalysts with good activity such as the Cs–pollucite catalyst have been investigated under severe reaction conditions and have a complex synthesis [55].

Table 6 Claisen–Schmidt condensation reaction on different catalytic systems

Effect of substituent on the preparation of chalcones

The effect of using different substituted benzaldehydes and acetophenone in the synthesis of chalcones was studied, the results of which are reported in Table 6. It is well understood that the presence of electron-withdrawing groups (Cl, NO2) on benzaldehyde and acetophenone (Entry 2, 5) has influenced the formation of enolate form and the yields of resulting chalcones. Also, electron-donating groups (OH, CH3, OCH3) have slightly reduced efficiency. Although both electron-donating and electron-withdrawing groups have reacted with appropriate efficiency, the presence of electron-withdrawing groups creates partial positive effects. According to Table 7, excellent yields have been obtained with benzaldehydes that have Cl electron-withdrawing groups (Entry 2), and the lowest efficiency has been obtained with acetophenone which has a methoxy group (Entry 6) (which is a strong resonant electron-donating group).

Table 7 Effect of electron-donating and electron-withdrawing groups substituent on the yield (%) of chalcones

Suggested mechanism of Claisen–Schmidt condensation reaction

The chalcone synthesis reaction as a green process was carried out at atmospheric pressure and 60 °C, in ethanol (96%) as solvent. At first, acetophenone is treated with the HT-like solid base catalyst that converts it to a more active enolate form. In the next step, it reacts with benzaldehyde to form an intermediate (Scheme 2). In the last step, with a heat of 60 ºC and in the presence of the catalyst, by removing a molecule of water, a conjugated double bond with carbonyl is created and the product becomes thermodynamically more stable [5].

Scheme 2
scheme 2

The suggested mechanism of Claisen–Schmidt condensation reaction by mixed metal oxides base catalyst

Conclusions

In this work, we have developed a simple, clean, and efficient solid base catalytic system for the synthesis of chalcones. In this effective process, a series of Ca3Al hydrotalcite (HT) samples and Ca2.5M0.5Al (M: Sr, Cd, Ni, and Co) HT-like were successfully synthesized and after calcination, was used as a solid base nanocatalyst in the Claisen–Schmidt reaction. Among the synthesized catalysts, the Sr0.5Ca2.5Al sample had the highest activity. This study showed that the replacing of divalent cations M2+ with Ca2+ in the Ca3Al mixed oxides derived from LDH precursors creates three types of medium, strong, and stronger basic sites due to the interaction between M, Ca, and Al oxides and the catalytic activity is dependent on the number of stronger basic sites.

Briefly, this catalytic system is non-toxic, inexpensive, convenient, and reusable. This system was used in mild conditions, with atmospheric pressure and temperature of 60 °C, in a mixture of ethanol and water as a green solvent. The yield (%) of chalcones reached 87% in the presence of 0.04 wt% (0.09 g) of Sr0.5Ca2.5Al catalyst at 60 °C in 6 h.