Introduction

Our surrounding environment continues to become more polluted, and the conventional chemical methods that contract with environmental pollution have been unable to meet the requirements of modern energy-saving themes and environmental protection [1]. Environmental problems induced by toxic and hardly degradable organic pollutants have posed a grave menace to human well-being and development in the twenty-first century. Semiconductor photocatalysis has attracted increasing interest and been recognized as a “green” and efficient strategy in the field of environmental remediation because it can directly utilize sunlight as the energy source [2]. In the development of efficient photocatalytic systems, the synthesis of high-performance photocatalysts performed under visible light remains most important [3].

In particular, the rapid growth in nanotechnology and nanomaterial synthesis has created a large amount of promising photosensitive semiconductor materials [3,4,5]. Of the common photosensitive semiconductors, TiO2 has proved to be the most promising photocatalyst in the degradation of dyes and pollutants in wastewater streams and contaminated air [6, 7]. This is attributed to its wide band gap (3.2 eV) and the frequent recombination of the photogenerated electron–hole pairs. The large band gap of 3.2 eV restricts the activation of TiO2 to high-energy UV radiation. Unfortunately UV radiation accounts for less than 5% of solar light and less than 0.1% of indoor lighting. To better utilize visible light that accounts for 43% of solar energy, efforts have been made to exploit visible light-responsive photocatalysts [6, 8].

Visible light-driven photocatalysis is highly expected to be an ideal “green” technology for remediation of environment pollution, hydrogen energy production from water and CO2 fixation, etc. [9,10,11].

Developing new materials has become a hot topic in order to improve the efficiency of degradation of dye and other molecules using just sunlight [12]. In the recent years, a lot of attention has been focused on preparing the adsorption material with low-cost and high adsorption capacity, like clay minerals, polymers, nanomaterials, and silica [12,13,14,15,16].

Among the alternative semiconductor photocatalysts that have been explored to date, layered double hydroxide (LDH)-based photocatalysts have emerged as a very promising candidate to replace TiO2, owing to their unique layered structure, tunable band gaps, low cost, ease of scale-up, and good photocatalytic activity for water splitting and other reactions [17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. LDHs are a family of 2D layered anionic clays with the general formula [M 2+1−x M 3+ x (OH)2][(An) x/n ·mH2O], where M2+ is a divalent metal ions such as Mg2+, Fe2+, Cu2+, Co2+, and Ca2+, M3+ is a trivalent metal ions such as Al3+, Cr3+, Fe3+, Co3+, Mn3+, and Ga3+, and An is an interlayer anion, such as Cl, \( \text{CO}_{3}^{2 - } \), F, \( \text{NO}_{3}^{ - } \), polyoxometalate and various organic anions and x is the M3+/(M2+ + M3+) molar ratio that the pure phase of LDHs is usually obtained for a restricted range as 0.2 ≤ x ≤ 0.33 [24,25,26,27,28]. The anions and divalent cations in these materials are often easily exchanged, which allows great flexibility in the composition and electronic structure of LDHs. By incorporating particular photoactive metal cations into LDHs, visible light-responsive photocatalysts with band gaps from 2.0 to 3.4 eV can be synthesized. Furthermore, by controlling the particle size, surface defects can be introduced that alter the LDH electronic structure and greatly enhance the efficiency of photogenerated charge separation and photocatalytic reactions rates. LDHs thus offer a robust structural platform for the development of novel semiconductor photocatalysts with high visible light activity, motivating detailed experimental and theoretical investigations in this area [29, 30].

Here we developed a ZnCrBi-LDH hybrid to improve the photocatalytic properties of ZnCr-LDH which may be applied in wastewater treatment. The composites were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transfer infrared (FTIR), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) techniques and other features to reveal the material’s morphology and other features. The photocatalytic degradation experiments of methylene blue (MB) dyes with ZnCrBi-LDH composite were conducted to show that a higher visible light-driven degradation of organic pollutants could be obtained. ZnCrBi-LDH composite photocatalyst exhibited much high photocatalytic activity as compared to ZnCr-LDH alone.

Experimental

Materials

Zinc nitrate hexahydrate [Zn(NO3)2·6H2O], chromium nitrate nonahydrate [Cr(NO3)3·9H2O], and bismuth(III) nitrate pentahydrate [Bi(NO3)3·5H2O] were purchased from Aldrich Chemical Co. All chemicals were commercial materials of the highest available purity, and they were used as received. Commercial methyl violet 2B (MV2B) dye was provided by Roshfrans company, and it was employed as received.

Preparation of ZnCrBi-LDH

The ZnCrBi-LDH with molar ratio of 2.0:0.7:0.3 was prepared by a simple co-precipitation method. In a typical procedure, 1.0 g (3.36 mmol) of Zn(NO3)2·6H2O and 0.47 g (1.18 mmol) of Cr(NO3)3·9H2O were dissolved in 30 mL of deionized water to form a clear mixed salt solution (Solution A). 0.25 g (0.50 mmol) of Bi(NO3)3·5H2O was dissolved in concentrated nitric acid solution (Solution B). Then, the above two saline solutions and a mixture containing NaOH (2 M) and Na2CO3 (0.5 M) were added simultaneously to a three-necked flask at a speed of 1 drop s−1. The pH of resulting suspension was maintained at 9–10 by continuous addition of a 1 M NaOH and the mixed solution stirring for 12 h, and then, it was sonicated for 1 h. Finally, the mixture was transferred to Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclaves and the hydrothermal temperature is 160 °C for another 24 h. The resulting solid product was separated by centrifugation, washed with deionized water several times until pH 7, and dried in an oven at 80 °C for 6 h to collect the solid powder ZnCrBi-LDH. Also, ZnCr-LDH with 2.0:1.0 molar ratios was prepared by similar procedure without using Bi.

Photocatalytic experiments

Photocatalytic activities of all the samples were evaluated by degradation of the aqueous methylene blue (MB; molecular weight, 319.85 g/mol) as model pollutant under visible light irradiation. MB is a cationic dye, used extensively for dying cotton, wool, and silk. The risks of the existence of this dye in wastewater have arisen from the burns effect of eye, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. MB has a maximum absorption in the 660 nm visible area. MB is chosen as a model contaminant to evaluate the photocatalytic activity of prepared samples due to its stability under visible light irradiation. Chemical structure of methylene blue (C16H18N3SCl) makes it to fall under a group of azin dyes, as shown in Scheme 1. The photocatalytic reaction was carried in a 50-mL single-compartment cylindrical quartz reactor containing 2 ppm of MB aqueous solution and 20 mg as-prepared photocatalysts. The solution was vigorously stirred with a magnetic stirrer. A 200-W xenon lamp was used as a light source with a UV filter to provide visible light. The luminous intensity of the xenon lamp was 100 mW/cm2. The actual experiments were performed at room temperature. Prior to illumination, the solution containing MB and photocatalyst magnetically was stirred for 120 min in the dark to ensure the establishment of an adsorption–desorption equilibrium between the photocatalyst and MB. Then, the solution was exposed to visible light irradiation under magnetic stirring for 120 min. At certain time intervals, specific amount of the solution was withdrawn and the changes in concentration of MB were observed using a UV–Vis spectrophotometer.

Scheme 1
scheme 1

Structure of methylene blue (MB)

Characterization techniques

FTIR spectra were recorded on Jasco-680 (Japan) spectrophotometer with 4 cm−1 resolution. The KBr pellet technique was applied for monitoring changes in the FTIR spectra of the samples in the range of 4000–400 cm−1. The vibrational transition frequencies are reported in wave numbers (cm−1). XRD (Philips X’ Pert Pro MPD) studies were performed to identify the formation of crystal phase by using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 0.1542 nm). The diffraction patterns were collected between 2θ of 5° and 80° at a scanning rate of 0.05°/min. The morphology of the samples was examined by FESEM (HITACHI; S-4160). The powdered sample was dispersed in H2O, and then, the sediment was dried at room temperature before gold coating. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of the samples were collected on a Philips CM120 transmission electron microscope with accelerator voltage of 100 kV. The UV–Vis absorption spectra were recorded using UV–Vis-NIR spectrophotometer with an integrating sphere (DUV-3700, Shimadzu, Japan), in which BaSO4 was used as a reference.

Results and discussion

FTIR study

FTIR spectra of ZnCr-LDH and ZnCrBi-LDH are shown in Fig. 1. In these spectra, the broad absorption band in the region 3100–3600 cm−1 is assigned to the OH stretching vibrations, ν(OH), associated with the basal hydroxyl groups and interlayer water. The characteristic band of angular deformation in water molecules, δ(H–O–H), is observed at 1640 cm−1. The O–C–O asymmetric stretching vibration appears between 1363 and 1507 cm−1. Compared with \( \text{CO}_{3}^{2 - } \) of CaCO3 (1430 cm−1), there is a considerable lower shifted absorption peak at 1365 cm−1, which shows that there was an intercalation between \( \text{CO}_{3}^{2 - } \) and interlayer H2O through the strong hydrogen bonding. The bands at lower wavenumbers such as 792, 552, and 431 cm−1 can be assigned to the metal–oxygen stretching modes (Zn–O, Cr–O, and Bi–O). These results confirmed the formation of LDHs (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

FTIR spectra of the a ZnCr-LDH and b ZnCrBi-LDH

X-ray diffraction

XRD is one of the most useful techniques to analyze the layered structure of nanomaterials. The XRD patterns of ZnCr-LDH and ZnCrBi-LDH samples with ZnCrBi mole ratios of 2.0:0.7:0.3 are shown in Fig. 2. As shown in Fig. 2a, it can be seen that ZnCr-LDH has strong peaks at 2θ = 11.6°, 23.7°, 34.6°, 39.7°, 46.3°, 61.56°, and 63.8° corresponding to (0 0 3), (0 0 6), (0 0 9), (0 1 5), (0 1 8), (110), and (1 1 3) planes, respectively. It is clear that ZnCr-LDH has hexagonal structure reported in the literature (JCPDS No. 05-0669), which almost has no change with ZnCrBi-LDH in the diffraction peaks position (Fig. 2b). All of the samples exhibit the characteristic diffraction peak of layered hydrotalcite-like materials, indicating that the bismuth does not destroy layered structure of the LDH, whereas a gradual decline in the intensity of (0 0 3) reflection peak and a significant broadening of (0 0 9) reflection were observed in the patterns of ZnCrBi-LDH. The broadness of the peaks in Fig. 2b indicates the low crystallinity of the ZnCrBi-LDH.

Fig. 2
figure 2

XRD patterns of the a ZnCr-LDH and b ZnCrBi-LDH

FESEM and EDX study

The surface morphologies and microstructural details of the as-synthesized photocatalysts were examined by SEM, EDS, and TEM measurements. Figure 3 shows the FESEM images as well as the EDS pattern of the ZnCr-LDH. The ZnCr-LDH ‏showed the nature of LDH particles which roughly consists of plate-like shape stacked on top of each other with lateral dimensions ranging over few micrometer and thickness over few hundred nanometers. Additionally, EDX pattern of the ZnCr-LDH indicates the elements of Zn and Cr and confirmed the formation of the LDH. The morphological feature of the Bi-doped ZnCr-LDH (ZnCrBi-LDH) has globular shape compared to the ZnCr-LDH which has plate-like shape (Fig. 4). The presence of Bi in the LDH was also confirmed by EDX techniques as shown in Fig. 4.

Fig. 3
figure 3

FESEM photographs and EDS pattern of the ZnCr-LDH sample

Fig. 4
figure 4

FESEM photographs and EDS pattern of the ZnCrBi-LDH sample

TEM study

TEM picture presented an actual image of nanoclay platelets to permit recognition of internal morphology of nanohybrids. TEM image of ZnCr-LDH and ZnCrBi-LDH samples as illustrated in Fig. 5a–d showed that the synthesized LDH is smooth overlapping crystals, and they are approximately in hexagonal form. As can be seen, the LDH sheets have homogeneous contrast, reflecting their ultrathin nature and uniform thickness. These were commonly observed for typical LDH compounds. The ZnCr-LDH and ZnCrBi-LDH samples have particle size around 20–40 nm.

Fig. 5
figure 5

TEM micrographs of the a, a′ ZnCr-LDH and b, b′ ZnCrBi-LDH

Optical measurements

The light absorbance of the ZnCr-LDH and ZnCrBi-LDH samples was evaluated by the UV–Vis diffuse reflection absorption spectra, and the results are shown in Fig. 6. As shown in Fig. 6, the ZnCrBi-LDH exhibits enhanced absorption in visible light region (centered at 586 nm) in comparison with ZnCr-LDH (centered at 394 nm). The strong absorption band in the region of 394 nm which can be assigned to typical in Zn(II) coordinated to the \( \text{CO}_{3}^{2 - } \) gallery [31,32,33]. Meanwhile, a broad absorption band from ~400 to 700 nm which is observed with maxima at ~586 nm may indicate the presence of Bi3+ or d–d transition of Cr3+ in the brucite-like sheets [34,35,36]. The broad nature of absorption at ~586 nm could be ascribed to supramolecular guest–guest (hydrogen bonding and van der Waals forces) or guest–host interactions (electrostatic attraction, hydrogen bonding and van der Waals forces) [31,32,33]. In case of the layered materials, the UV spectrum shows an overall broadening and a red shift is observed due to higher aggregate formation.

Fig. 6
figure 6

UV–Vis spectra of the a ZnCr-LDH and b ZnCrBi-LDH

Photocatalytic activity of ZnCr-LDH and ZnCrBi-LDH samples

Photocatalytic activity of different samples was followed through degradation of methylene blue as a function of irradiation time with visible light. To get the response of photocatalytic activities of ZnCr-LDH and ZnCrBi-LDH samples, the absorption spectra of exposed samples at various time intervals were recorded and the rate of color degradation was observed in terms of change in intensity at λmax of the dye. The photodegradation yield is defined as:

$$ {\text{Photo degradation yield (\%) }}=[(C_{0} - C)/C_{0} ] \times 100 $$
(1)

where C 0 and C are the initial concentration and concentration of dyes after photodegradation under visible light irradiation at various time intervals, respectively. In order to obtain the real photodegradation yield, the decreases in the dye concentration because of the adsorption and direct photolysis should be deducted. The photocatalysis of MB is negligible without the presence of ZnCr-LDH and ZnCrBi-LDH samples, suggesting that the degradation of RhB is induced by photocatalysis. Figure 7a shows the photodegradation rate of MB under visible light in the presence of different samples. MB can be completely decomposed within 120 min by the ZnCrBi-LDH heterojunction under visible light irradiation, which needs much less time than that of the ZnCr-LDH sample. After exposing the samples and MB dye under visible light for 120 min, the MB concentrations decreased dramatically with the ZnCrBi-LDH and ZnCr-LDH composite, i.e., about 99 and 63% of the MB dye was degraded by the ZnCrBi-LDH and ZnCr-LDH composite, respectively. The higher photocatalytic activity of ZnCrBi-LDH sample can be attributed to the combined effect of various factors: the bismuth doping, the effect of surface morphology on the surface area of these samples, and the increased light-harvesting ability (capability to absorb visible light and higher light absorption, compared to ZnCr-LDH). The kinetics of the decolorization of organic dyes has often been modeled with the following Langmuir–Hinshelwood equation [37, 38]:

Fig. 7
figure 7

a Photocatalytic degradation of MO over the different samples under visible light irradiation. b Photocatalyst stability test of prepared sample

$$ \text{ln(}C_{0} /C\text{)} = k_{{\text{app}}} t $$
(2)

where k app is the apparent pseudo-first-order reaction rate constant and t is the reaction time. So degradation kinetics of methylene blue was studied by plotting the natural logarithm of concentration ratio ln(C t /C 0) versus the irradiation time. The degradation process follows pseudo-first-order kinetics, and the degradation rate constant calculated from the slope of the kinetics plot was found to be 0.0084 and 0.0333 min−1 for ZnCr-LDH and ZnCr-LDH samples, respectively. Regeneration of catalyst is one of the key aspects to make heterogeneous catalysis technology for practical applications. The stability and reusability of the ZnCr-LDH and ZnCrBi-LDH catalysts were carried out with the same ratio of catalyst and dye concentration. After each reaction run, the catalyst was separated from the reaction system and its reusability was also investigated carefully. The catalyst was washed several times with distilled water, dried, and reused. Each cycle was carried out in the dark for 120 min and then exposed under visible light for 120 min. As shown in Fig. 7b, after a four-cycle experiment, these catalysts exhibited similar catalytic performance without significant deactivation. The above results revealed that these composites are potential catalysts with good photocatalytic activity, stability, and reusability.

Conclusions

In summary, ZnCr-LDH and ZnCrBi-LDH composites were synthesized by co-precipitation method. The characteristics of the obtained samples were investigated by SEM, TEM, XRD, FTIR, EDX, and UV–Vis. Photocatalytic experiments showed that ZnCrBi-LDH catalyst displayed high photocatalytic activity as compared to ZnCr-LDH under xenon light irradiation because of the increased surface area and light-harvesting ability. Kinetic research showed that the reaction rate constant of ZnCrBi-LDH sample is approximately 1.4 times higher than the reaction rate constant of ZnCr-LDH. The stability of the samples indicated no observable performance degradation for prepared photocatalyst even after four recycles. Therefore, these prepared composites would have a widely applied prospect in photocatalytic field to eliminate the organic pollutants from wastewater.