Abstract
Tan spot, caused by Pyrenophora tritici-repentis, and fusarium head blight (FHB), caused by the Fusarium graminearum species complex, are among the main wheat diseases worldwide. This 3-year field study evaluated the effect of soil incorporation of calcium silicate, a source of silicon (Si), to manage tan spot and FHB and improve grain yield and quality. The effect of Si was compared on two cultivars contrasting in disease resistance and associated with one or two fungicide sprays. Calcium silicate fertilization increased the Si concentration in the soil and wheat leaf and spike tissues. The increase of Si concentration in wheat tissues was associated with reduction in the severity of both tan spot and FHB, consequently increased the quality and grain yield of wheat. The reduction of disease severity conferred by Si was greater for tan spot than FHB. The greatest control of tan spot and FHB was obtained with the moderately resistant cultivar grown in soil amended with calcium silicate (+Si) and treated with two fungicide sprayings. On the other hand, the highest grain yield, under high disease pressure, was obtained in +Si plants, regardless of the cultivar, treated with two fungicide sprays. The results of this study show for the first time that the incorporation of Si in the soil complemented the effect of genetic resistance and fungicide treatments in controlling both tan spot and FHB. Furthermore, results indicate that calcium silicate fertilization is useful as part of integrated management of these wheat diseases.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is the most consumed and second most produced cereal worldwide, and is a staple food for more than 36% of world’s population (FAO 2020; Li et al. 2015). Tan spot (Fig. 1a), caused by Pyrenophora tritici-repentis, and fusarium head blight (FHB) (Fig. 1b), caused by the Fusarium graminearum species complex, are two of the main wheat diseases worldwide. Tan spot affects the leaves and spikes, causing a reduction in grain yield by up to 48%, mainly due to the reduction in the number and weight of grains per spike (Rees and Platz 1983; Ronis et al. 2009). The FHB pathogen reduces grain yield by up to 50% and also contaminates grain with mycotoxins, especially trichothecenes such as deoxynivalenol, which poses a serious threat to food safety (Bai and Shaner 1994; McMullen et al. 2012).
The management of these diseases can be accomplished by sowing healthy seeds, and using crop rotation and tillage to reduce inoculum (Bockus and Claassen 1992; Carmona et al. 2006). Fungicides are also used to control tan spot and FHB, but chemical treatment adds cost to wheat growers, and sometimes, for FHB, the results of their application are not satisfactory (D’Angelo et al. 2014). Planting of resistant cultivars is considered an effective and environmentally friendly approach to reduce damage caused by foliar and spike diseases (Halder et al. 2019). Unfortunately, resistance to FHB is largely quantitatively inherited and limited by additive genetic effect and genotype × environment interaction, making it available only as moderately resistant cultivars (Buerstmayr et al. 2020; Halder et al. 2019). Moderate resistance of cultivars to tan spot and FHB is associated with higher plant defense through cell wall fortification, and increased biochemical defense mechanisms that restrict pathogen colonization and/or mycotoxin accumulation (Pritsch et al. 2000; Strelkov and Lamari 2003; Walter et al. 2010; Ding et al. 2011; Dorneles et al. 2017).
With respect to wheat defense against tan spot and FHB, silicon (Si) is an attractive complement to enhance the defense mechanisms of the plants, especially as a factor for integrated control of the diseases. In wheat, several fungal diseases (blast - Magnaporthe oryzae Triticum pathotype; tan spot, septoria leaf blotch - Zymoseptoria tritici; spot blotch - Cochliobolus sativus; and powdery mildew - Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici) were found to be reduced by Si through alteration of their monocyclic components such as incubation period, infection efficiency, lesion expansion rate, lesion size, and number of lesions per unit leaf area (Rodrigues et al. 2015; Dorneles et al. 2017; Pazdiora et al. 2018). The effect of Si on the reduction of disease intensity is basically attributed to two mechanisms that act additively and/or synergistically: physical barrier and biochemical defenses (Debona et al. 2017). In wheat, the physical barrier was reported to be due to Si deposition below the cuticle and the increase of papillae deposition at infection sites (Bélanger et al. 2003; Xavier-filha et al. 2011). Furthermore, Si primed the biochemical defenses by increasing defense enzyme activity, biosynthesis of phenolic compounds and phytoalexins, and accumulation of hydrogen peroxide at the infection sites (Rodrigues et al. 2015; Debona et al. 2017; Dorneles et al. 2017, 2018).
Taking into account the effect of Si against leaf diseases and wheat defense to tan spot and FHB, we believe that wheat plants supplied with Si may be less affected by both leaf and spike diseases, and therefore allowing a reduction in the number of fungicide sprays during the crop cycle. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the potential of Si soil amendment to reduce disease and yield damage caused by tan spot and FHB. The Si effects were analyzed on two wheat cultivars contrasting in resistance to tan spot and FHB associated to fungicide treatment with one (at the stem elongation stage) and two (at stem elongation and flowering stages) sprays.
2 Material and methods
2.1 Study site, cultural practices, and treatments
Field experiments were conducted at the Palma Agriculture Center (31°48′06.4″S 52°30′18.6″W) belonging to the Federal University of Pelotas. The same experiment was conducted in three successive field seasons, 2016, 2017, and 2018. In each year, the experiment was established in a conventionally tilled field, after burying previous crop residues. The area used was a former orange orchard and the 2016 crop season was the first year of cultivation with wheat.
The physicochemical characteristics of the soil were as follows: 19% clay, 1.79% organic matter, Ca2+, Mg2+, Al3+, H+Al3+ = 3.2, 0.7, 0.2, 2.2 cmolc.kg−1, respectively, cation exchange capacity (1.0 M CH3CO2NH4) 4.2 cmolc.kg−1, base saturation = 85%, pH (CaCl2) = 4.3, P and K (Mehlich 1) = 7.2 and 36 mg.kg−1, respectively. The concentration of available Si (extracted with 0.01M CaCl2) was 6.2 mg.kg−1. The soil fertility was adjusted, as described below, using chemical fertilizer to achieve a yield of 4.0 t.ha−1.
Calcium silicate (Agrosilício Plus®, Agronelli Insumos Agrícolas, Uberaba, Brazil), composed of 10.5% Si, 25.0% Ca, and 6.0% Mg, was the source of Si. In the 2016 and 2017 crop seasons, the product was incorporated into the soil at a rate of 4.0 t.ha−1 in order to increase the soil pH to 6.5. To standardize the amount of calcium and magnesium supplied to the plants in the calcium silicate treatment, the soil in the control treatment was amended with extra-fine limestone at the rate of 3.33 t.ha−1. The extra-fine limestone (Dagoberto Barcelos, Caçapava do Sul, Brazil) was composed of 26.5% Ca and 15.0% Mg. In the 2018 crop season, 2.0 t.ha−1 of calcium silicate or extra-fine limestone was added to the soil. For all seasons, calcium silicate or limestone was incorporated in the soil by harrowing 30 days before sowing.
Soil samples collected on the day of sowing (2016 crop season) indicated concentrations of 3.5 and 3.4 cmolc.kg−1 of Ca2+ and 10.8 and 6.2 mg.kg−1 of Si, respectively, in the plots that received calcium silicate and extra-fine limestone (Fig. 2). In the second year of the experiment (2017 season), soil analysis indicated 5.1 and 4.3 cmolc.kg−1 of Ca2+ and 13.8 and 6.2 mg.kg−1 of Si, respectively, in the plots that received calcium silicate or extra-fine limestone. In 2018, soil analysis indicated 5.2 and 4.5 cmolc.kg−1 of Ca2+ and 15.4 and 6.2 mg.kg−1 of Si, respectively, in the plots that received calcium silicate and extra-fine limestone.
Two wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars were chosen – Tbio Toruk (Biotrigo®) and Tbio Sossego (Biotrigo®) – from among regionally adapted cultivars with similar anthesis and maturity dates, but contrasting in disease resistance, the former being more susceptible to tan spot and FHB than the latter. Plots were planted (9 rows, 0.17 m row spacing) with a plot drill (Semeato, SHP model) at density of 300 plants per m2. Chemical fertilizer (05-20-20 nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium) at rate of 300 kg. ha−1 was applied at sowing. Total nitrogen (granular urea, N, 45%) input was 100 kg N ha−1 yr−1, where 15% of the total N was applied as basal fertilizer and the remainder (85%) was top-dressed at the phenological stages of tillering and stem elongation (growth stage (GS) 25 and GS37). Iodosulfuron-methyl (Hussar®; Bayer, 100 g c.p. ha−1) and imidacloprid beta-cyfluthrin (Connect®; Bayer, 500 mL c.p. ha−1) were used to control weeds and insects, respectively, as necessary to ensure these factors would not influence the outcome of the experiment.
The fungicide prothioconazole (150 g L−1; triazolinthione) + trifloxystrobin (175 g L−1; strobilurin) (Fox®; Bayer, 0.5 c.p. ha−1) was applied at the stem elongation stage (GS32/GS33) (one spraying treatment) alone or at both the stem elongation stage and at flowering (GS60) (two spraying treatments). The fungicide was applied using a CO2 pressured sprayer kit, with four tip nozzles (TTJ60 11002; Teejet®), delivering 200 L ha−1.
2.2 Experimental design
The experimental design was a three-way (2 × 2 × 2) factorial scheme in a randomized block (two silicon treatments - not supplied (−Si) or supplied (+Si); two cultivars – Tbio Toruk or Tbio Sossego; and two fungicide treatments – one application or two applications), with four replications. Each experimental plot was 1.53 m × 5 m, separated by 1 m and a 30 cm deep furrow to prevent runoff of rainwater from one plot to the other (Fig. 3).
2.3 Disease assessment
The disease assessment was conducted from tillering to early dough (GS83). Powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici) and Septoria leaf blotch (Zymoseptoria tritici) were observed only occasionally on plants of some treatments and in some years, but with low incidence (less than 20%) and low severity (less than 1%). The main diseases were tan spot and FHB.
In 2017 and 2018, tan spot incidence was 100% regardless of the treatment since stem elongation, so only the severity was measured, according to Pazdiora et al. (2018), by quantifying the percentage of the leaf area showing disease symptoms relative to the total leaf area of ten plants randomly chosen at five different locations, resulting in total of 50 plants per plot. As in 2016 the tan spot occurred only after flowering stage, the data presented for the 3 years are the latest evaluation conducted at early dough.
The FHB incidence was measured at early dough stage by counting the number of spikes with typical FHB symptoms (i.e., fully or partially bleached spikes). For each experimental plot, 100 spikes from the central line were observed, resulting in 400 spikes per treatment. Disease incidence was expressed as the percentage of symptomatic wheat spikes. The FHB severity was the percentage of spikelets with typical FHB symptoms relative to the total number of spikelets per spike. The FHB severity was measured in the same spikes used for FHB incidence evaluation.
2.4 Yield measurement
Wheat was hand harvested from 3.4 m2 (five rows with four meters) and threshed in a mechanical grain thresher (EDA, model TR. PARCELA). The grain moisture content of a representative subsample was measured with a moisture tester (Gehaka Agri G600). Grain yield was measured with a balance and normalized to 13% grain moisture content. A sample of 1000 grains, counted by an electronic seed and grain counter (Sanick ESC 2011), was weighed on an analytical balance (Shimadzu model BL 3200H) and expressed in grams to determine the 1000 grain weight. The hectoliter weight (HW) was measured using a cereal weight scale (Dallemolle type 40) according to international standards.
2.5 Determination of Si concentration
Flag leaves and spikes were sampled at the flowering stage (GS60), rinsed with deionized water, dried for 72 h at 70 °C, and ground using a mortar and pestle to pass through a 40-mesh screen. Foliar and spike Si concentrations were determined by colorimetric analysis of 0.1 g of alkali-digested tissue (Dorneles et al. 2017).
2.6 Data analysis
Prior to Anova, Levene’s test was used to assess whether homoscedasticity could be assumed. After applying the parametric ANOVA, the Shapiro–Wilk test was applied to ascertain normality of the fitted residuals. Data of the three years were analyzed separately (Tables 1 and 2) and means compared by Tukey test (P≤ 0.05). All the statistical analyses were performed using the computing environment R (R Core Team 2020), using “agricolae” (Mendiburu 2014) and “car” (Fox and Weisberg 2019) packages.
3 Results
Extra-fine limestone amendment in the soil increased the concentration of calcium (Ca) in the soil during the three growing seasons, but not the silicon (Si) concentration (Fig. 2). However, calcium silicate amendment increased the concentration of both Si and Ca in the soil over the three seasons (Fig. 2). The highest concentration of Si in the soil resulted in the significantly higher concentration of the element in the leaf and spike (Fig. 2).
The temperatures during the wheat cycle were favorable to diseases (tan spot and FHB) in the three seasons (Fig. 4). However, the rain distribution was more variable. The 2016 season was marked by drought during the stem elongation and booting stages, but precipitation was normal after the flowering stage (Fig. 4). In 2017 and 2018, rainfall was distributed more evenly across the wheat cycle.
In 2017 (Fig. 5b) and 2018 (Fig. 5c), the meteorological conditions were more conducive to tan spot than 2016, when the disease severity was lower than 10% (Fig 5a). The effects of the higher resistance in the cultivar Tbio Sossego were pronounced in 2017 (Fig. 5b) and 2018 (Fig. 5c), significantly reducing the tan spot severity compared to the Tbio Toruk cultivar, regardless of the fungicide and soil amendment treatments. The amendment with calcium silicate (+Si) in the soil significantly reduced tan spot severity, especially in 2017 (Fig. 5b) and 2018 (Fig. 5c), regardless of the cultivar and fungicide treatment. We would point out that, generally, tan spot severity was lower in +Si plants treated with fungicide at the stem elongation stage than −Si plants treated twice with fungicide (spraying at stem elongation and flowering stages). When comparing the same cultivar with the same soil amendment, two fungicide sprayings were always more effective than one at the stem elongation stage in reducing tan spot severity (Fig. 5a–c).
The effect of treatments (cultivars, soil amendments, and fungicide application) on tan spot severity can be visualized in Fig. 6. The higher resistance to tan spot of the cultivar Tbio Sossego (Fig. 6i) relative to Tbio Toruk (Fig. 6a) is clearly evident by comparing the −Si plants treated with fungicide applied at the stem elongation stage. The leaves of the plants of Tbio Toruk were affected by the disease up to the flag leaf, while up to two green leaves were still visible in the Tbio Sossego plants. The effect of calcium silicate was clearly evident in plants treated with a single fungicide application at the stem elongation stage for both cultivars (Fig. 6b and j). For Tbio Toruk, +Si plants (Fig. 6b) retained at least two green leaves while in −Si plants (Fig. 6a), the disease affected all leaves. In the cultivar Tbio Sossego, a higher number of leaves remained green in +Si plants (Fig. 6j) than in −Si plants (Fig. 6i). For both cultivars, calcium silicate amendment in the soil plus one spraying of fungicide at the stem elongation stage (Fig. 6b and j) conferred a similar number of green leaves to plants that received two sprayings in soil amended with extra-fine limestone (−Si) (Fig. 6c and k). Plants of both cultivars that received two fungicide sprayings showed higher proportion of green leaf area than plants with one spraying, and the tan spot control was the highest for +Si plants receiving two sprayings (Fig. 6d and l).
For FHB, the effect of the higher genetic resistance present in the cultivar Tbio Sossego was observed in 2016, 2017, and 2018 for FHB incidence (Fig. 5d–f) and in two crop seasons (2017 and 2018) for FHB severity (Fig. 5g and h). The lower FHB incidence and severity in spikes of the cultivar Tbio Sossego (Fig. 6m and n) compared to Tbio Toruk (Fig. 6e and f) was also clearly observed in the field, especially for plants without fungicide application at flowering. Calcium silicate reduced the FHB incidence only in Tbio Sossego plants treated with fungicide at flowering (2016 and 2017) (Fig. 5d and e) and for both fungicide treatments in 2018 (Fig. 5f). However, lower FHB severity was recorded in +Si plants than −Si ones, of both cultivars, regardless of the number of fungicide applications, in 2017 (Fig. 6h) and 2018 (Fig. 6p), except for Tbio Toruk treated with fungicide at the stem elongation stage in 2017. In general, fungicide spraying at the flowering stage significantly reduced the FHB incidence, especially in 2017 and 2018, regardless of the cultivar or soil amendment, and for the +Si plants of Tbio Sossego in 2016. On the other hand, the FHB severity was reduced significantly by fungicide treatment at flowering regardless of the cultivar or soil corrective in the three crop seasons.
The grain yield of Tbio Toruk was higher than that of Tbio Sossego, regardless of fungicide and soil amendment, in 2016 (Fig. 7a); in plants receiving two fungicide sprayings, in 2017 (Fig. 7b); and for +Si plants treated with fungicide at the stem elongation stage in 2018 (Fig. 7c). The cultivar Tbio toruk also showed higher grain weight regardless of the fungicide and soil amendment in 2016 (Fig. 7d), and for +Si plants in 2017 (Fig. 7e) and 2018 (Fig. 7f). Calcium silicate, compared to extra-fine limestone, significantly increased the grain yield in 2017 (Fig. 7b) and 2018 (Fig. 7c), except for plants that received two fungicide sprayings in 2017. Grain weight (Fig. 7e) and hectoliter weight (Fig. 7h) were only increased by calcium silicate in plants treated with fungicide at the stem elongation stage in 2017. In 2018, calcium silicate significantly increased the grain weight of Tbio Toruk with two fungicide sprayings (Fig. 7f), and the hectoliter weight of grains of Tbio Toruk (Fig. 7i), regardless of the number of fungicide sprays. In general, the fungicide treatment at flowering increased the grain yield and the weight of grains, especially in 2017. Furthermore, hectoliter weight also increased due to fungicide application at flowering, regardless of the cultivar or soil amendment, in 2017 (Fig. 7h) and 2018 (Fig. 7i).
4 Discussion
In previous studies, under greenhouse environment, calcium silicate treatment of wheat has been shown to reduce tan spot severity by altering several epidemic components (Pazdiora et al. 2018). This effect caused by calcium silicate fertilization occurred due to increasing the silicon (Si) concentration in wheat leaves, which has been associated with earlier and stronger activation of the plant’s capacity to defend itself against P. tritici-repentis infection through several defense mechanisms, including superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, chitinase, and phenylalanine ammonia-lyase activities, as well as the accumulation of hydrogen peroxide and derivatives of the phenylpropanoid pathway (Dorneles et al. 2017, 2018). The current study shows for the first time the increase in the Si concentration in the leaves and spikes in wheat plants grown in field conditions in soil amended with calcium silicate, which reduced tan spot and FHB intensities, consequently increasing grain yield. Furthermore, this study also reports for the first time the integration of calcium silicate fertilization with genetic resistance and fungicide spraying to control tan spot and FHB of wheat.
The effect of calcium silicate on tan spot severity increased from 2016 to 2018 due to increasing availability of the element in the soil, which increased the leaf concentration. The lower tan spot severity in 2016 was due to at least two factors: first, the absence or very low initial inoculum of P. tritici-repentis in the area because that was the first year that wheat was grown; second, the slower disease progress due a shortage of rain during the stem elongation and booting stages. Under low disease pressure, the effects of treatments on disease mitigation were weak and more difficult to discriminate. However, the contribution of genetic resistance, calcium silicate amendment, and fungicide sprays were clear in both 2017 and 2018. The greatest difference in tan spot severity between −Si and +Si plants was observed for Tbio Toruk, the more susceptible cultivar, treated with fungicide at stem elongation. However, the lowest tan spot severity occurred in the Tbio Sossego plants treated twice with fungicide, especially in 2018, showing the importance of the high partial resistance to improve disease control. This result is in agreement with previous studies that showed higher reduction of tan spot by Si in plants with moderate resistance due to strong and fast defense activation (Dorneles et al. 2017, 2018; Pazdiora et al. 2018).
The change in the resistance components (previously reported by Dorneles et al. 2017; and Pazdiora et al. 2018) in the +Si plants led to a smaller number and size of lesions and a longer time to complete the infection cycles by the pathogen, which thus reduced the progress of tan spot, resulting in lower disease severity at the end of the wheat cycle. There was a lower efficiency in the reduction of the disease by calcium silicate in the field compared to that reported for a greenhouse study (Pazdiora et al. 2018). However, it is important to highlight that although the effect in the field was lower than that in the greenhouse, it was still significant and significantly reduced the final tan spot severity and increased grain yield and quality.
Fungicide treatment, especially the second application at the flowering stage, was fundamental in −Si plants to reduce the tan spot severity, particularly in the most susceptible cultivar, Tbio Toruk. However, the small difference in the severity of tan spot between +Si plants with one fungicide spraying (stem elongation) and −Si plants with two fungicide sprays (stem application and flowering), regardless of cultivar, indicates that the combination of calcium silicate fertilization with fungicide application had an additive effect on disease control. The results of this study show that calcium silicate amendment in the soil increased the effect of the intrinsic partial resistance of each genotype against the disease as well as the control obtained by fungicide application. The additive effect of calcium silicate in the soil with fungicide spraying has also been reported for the control of anthracnose of sorghum, and brown spot and blast of rice (Datnoff et al. 1991; Resende et al. 2013). Considering that in Brazil, control of disease in wheat typically involves at least two fungicide sprayings during the vegetative stages (Barro et al. 2017) and one to three applications in the reproductive stages (specifically for FHB control), totaling three to five applications during the crop cycle (D’Angelo et al. 2014), the results of this study indicate the possibility of reducing the number of fungicide sprayings required for tan spot control.
For FHB, the fungicide application at flowering had the most noticeable effect in reducing the disease incidence and severity. However, the moderate resistance of the cultivar Tbio Sossego to FHB was enhanced by calcium silicate, reducing the disease incidence when combined with fungicide application at the flowering stage. Furthermore, the addition of calcium silicate in the soil reduced the FHB severity and increased the efficacy of control conferred by the fungicide as indicated by the lower disease severity on +Si plants. Infection by Fusarium occurs in the reproductive organs (Kang and Buchenauer 2000) through the penetration by hyphae in the anthers, in which the plant’s defense mechanisms are inefficient against the pathogen (Kheiri et al. 2018). The moderate resistance observed in some wheat cultivars is associated with stronger plant defense through cell wall fortification (Walter et al. 2010; Ding et al. 2011) and increased biochemical defense mechanisms, restricting pathogen colonization (Pritsch et al. 2000; Walter et al. 2010; Ding et al. 2011). The results observed in the field, showing little or no effect of calcium silicate on FHB incidence but significant reduction of disease severity, mainly in 2017 and 2018, support the view that the effect of Si in plants acts mainly by enhancing the plant’s defense mechanisms (Debona et al. 2017). However, for Si to initiate this effect on plant defense, a minimum concentration of the element in the plant tissue is needed (Dallagnol et al. 2011), which probably was not achieved in the 2016 growing season, as indicated by the lower concentration of Si in the soil and in the wheat tissues compared to the concentration observed in 2017 and 2018. Furthermore, the higher effect of Si on the control of tan spot than FHB may also be associated with a greater difference of Si concentration between plant organs, with the concentration being greater in the leaves than in the spikes.
The lower disease severity in +Si plants was accompanied by increased grain yield of up to 1.0 ton per hectare in some combinations of cultivar and fungicide spraying, especially in 2017 and 2018. Furthermore, lower disease severity in +Si plants resulted in increases, sometimes significant, in the 1000 grain weight and quality, measured by the hectoliter weight (always higher than the minimum of 70). However, the grain yield and quality were significantly influenced by the number of fungicide sprayings, being higher when plants were treated with fungicide at stem elongation and at flowering stages.
Although calcium silicate clearly reduced the severity of tan spot and FHB, the highest yields were always obtained with two fungicide applications. It was evident that Si confers benefits to wheat plants both in disease control and grain yield and quality. However, although Si significantly reduced the severity of FHB, the spraying of fungicide at the flowering stage is still essential for improved disease control. Thus, in order to obtain greater benefit from the effect of Si, aiming to reduce the number of fungicide applications (especially in the vegetative phase), further studies should be conducted to evaluate the combination of different wheat cultivars with higher partial resistance, associated with crop rotation at one or two-year intervals, and realignment of fungicide application, especially in the vegetative phase.
5 Conclusions
The results of this study showed for the first time that the supply of calcium silicate to wheat plants was efficient in reducing the intensity of tan spot and FHB in the field. Furthermore, although the Si effect was significant, regardless of resistance level of the wheat cultivar or the number of fungicide applications, its supply to the plants with higher partial resistance resulted in lower intensity of tan spot and FHB.
The integration of the silicon improved grain yield and quality, showing that supply of calcium silicate to wheat plants is an alternative that can be integrated into wheat disease management programs, along with crop management practices and genetic resistance, to reduce the number of fungicide sprays.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Change history
05 May 2021
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-021-00695-y
References
Bai G, Shaner G (1994) Scab of wheat: prospects for control. Plant Dis 78:760–766. https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-78-0760
Barro JP, Forte CT, Trentin D, Scariot M, Milanesi PM (2017) Effectiveness of different fungicide formulations and number of applications in controlling wheat leaf rust. Summa Phytopathol 43:276–280. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-5405/174240
Bélanger RR, Benhamou N, Menzies JG (2003) Cytological evidence of an active role of silicon in wheat resistance to powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f. sp tritici). Phytopathology 93:402–412. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.2003.93.4.402
Bockus WW, Claassen MM (1992) Effects of crop-rotation and residue management-practices on severity of tan spot of winter-wheat. Plant Dis 76:633–636. https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-76-0633
Buerstmayr M, Stainer B, Buerstmayr H (2020) Breeding for Fusarium head blight resistance in wheat - progress and challenges. Plant Breed 139:429–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbr.12797
Carmona MA, Ferrazini M, Barreto DE (2006) Tan spot of wheat caused by Drechslera tritici-repentis: detection, transmission, and control in wheat seed. Cereal Res Commun 34:1043–1049. https://doi.org/10.1556/CRC.34.2006.2-3.236
D’Angelo DL, Bradley CA, Ames KA et al (2014) Efficacy of fungicide applications during and after anthesis against Fusarium head blight and deoxynivalenol in soft red winter wheat. Plant Dis 98:1387–1397. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-01-14-0091-RE
Dallagnol LJ, Rodrigues FA, Damatta FM et al (2011) Deficiency in silicon uptake affects cytological, physiological, and biochemical events in the rice-Bipolaris oryzae interaction. Phytopathology 101:92–104. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-04-10-0105
Datnoff LE, Raid RN, Snyder GH et al (1991) Effect of calcium silicate on blast and brown spot intensities and yields of rice. Plant Dis 75:729–732. https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-75-0729
Debona D, Rodrigues FA, Datnoff LE (2017) Silicon’s role in abiotic and biotic plant stresses. Annu Rev Phytopathol 55:85–107. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-080516-035312
Ding L, Xu H, Yi H et al (2011) Resistance to hemi-biotrophic F. graminearum infection is associated with coordinated and ordered expression of diverse defense signaling pathways. PLoS ONE 6:e19008. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019008
Dorneles KR, Dallagnol LJ, Pazdiora PC, Rodrigues FA, Deuner S (2017) Silicon potentiates biochemical defense responses of wheat against tan spot. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 97:69–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmpp.2017.01.001
Dorneles KR, Pazdiora PC, Hoffmann JF, Chaves FC, Monte LG, Rodrigues FA, Dallagnol LJ (2018) Wheat leaf resistance to Pyrenophora tritici-repentis induced by silicon activation of phenylpropanoid metabolism. Plant Pathol 67:1713–1724. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.12876
FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization. World Food Situation. Available at: <FAO Cereal Supply and Demand Brief | World Food Situation | Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations> Accessed in March 2020.
Fox J, Weisberg S (2019) An R companion to applied regression, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks
Halder J, Zhang J, Ali S, Sidhu JS, Gill HS, Talukder SK, Kleinjan J, Turnipseed B, Sehgal SK (2019) Mining and genomic characterization of resistance to tan spot, Stagonospora nodorum blotch (SNB), and fusarium head blight in Watkins core collection of wheat landraces. BMC Plant Biol 19:480. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-019-2093-3
Kang Z, Buchenauer H (2000) Ultrastructural and immunocytochemical investigation of pathogen development and host responses in resistant and susceptible wheat spikes infected by Fusarium culmorum. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 57:255–268. https://doi.org/10.1006/pmpp.2000.0305
Kheiri A, Jorf SAM, Malihipour A (2018) Infection process and wheat response to Fusarium head blightcaused by Fusarium graminearum. Eur J Plant Pathol 153:489–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-018-1576-7
Li AL, Geng SF, Zhang LQ, Liu DC, Mao L (2015) Making the bread: insights from newly synthesized allohexaploid wheat. Mol Plant 8:847–859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2015.02.016
McMullen M, Bergstrom G, De Wolf E et al (2012) Unified effort to fight an enemy of wheat and barley: fusarium head blight. Plant Dis 96:1712–1728. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-03-12-0291-FE
Mendiburu F, (2014) Agricolae: statistical procedures for agricultural research. R package version 1.2-1
Pazdiora PC, Dorneles KR, Forcelini CA et al (2018) Silicon suppresses tan spot development on wheat infected by Pyrenophora tritici-repentis. Eur J Plant Pathol 150:49–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-017-1251-4
Pritsch C, Muehlbauer GJ, Bushnell WR, Somers DA, Vance CP (2000) Fungal development and induction of defense response genes during early infection of wheat spikes by Fusarium graminearum. Mol Plant Microbe Interac 13:159–169. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI.2000.13.2.159
R Core Team (2020) The R Project for statistical computing. Available from: www.r-project.org. Accessed 30 Mar 2020
Rees RG, Platz GJ (1983) Effects of yellow spot on wheat - comparison of epidemics at different stages of crop development. Aust J Agric Res 34:39–46. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9830039
Resende RS, Rodrigues FA, Costa RV, Silva DD (2013) Silicon and fungicide effects on anthracnose in moderately resistant and susceptible sorghum lines. J Phytop 161:11–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/jph.12020
Rodrigues FA, Dallagnol LJ, Duarte HSS et al (2015) Silicon control of foliar diseases in monocots and dicots. In: Rodrigues FA, Datnoff LE (eds) Sil diseases. Springer International Publishing, pp 67–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22930-0_4
Rodrigues FA, Resende RS, Dallagnol LJ et al (2015) Silicon potentiates host defense mechanisms against infection by plant pathogens. In: Rodrigues FA, Datnoff LE (eds) Silicon and plant diseases. Springer International Publishing, pp 109–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22930-0_5
Ronis A, Semaskiene R, Dabkevicius Z et al (2009) Influence of leaf diseases on grain yield and yield components in winter wheat. J Plant Prot Res 49:151–157. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10045-009-0021-5
Strelkov SE, Lamari L (2003) Host–parasite interactions in tan spot Pyrenophora tritici-repentis of wheat. Can J Plant Pathol 25:339–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/07060660309507089
Walter S, Nicholson P, Doohan FN (2010) Action and reaction of host and pathogen during Fusarium head blight disease. New Phytol 185:54–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03041.X
Xavier Filha MS, Rodrigues FA, Domiciano GP et al (2011) Wheat resistance to leaf blast mediated by silicon. Austral Plant Pathol 40:28–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13313-010-0010-1
Acknowledgements
We are thankful to BIOTRIGO for providing wheat seeds for the experiments. We also thank anonymous reviewers for suggestions in the manuscript.
Code availability
Not applicable.
Funding
The authors are thankful to the CAPES (Finance code 001). PC Pazdiora was supported by student fellowship of the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) (grant number 140699/2015-5). LJ Dallagnol is supported by fellowship CNPq (grant number 308149/2018-1). This research was supported by the CNPq (grant number: 403292-2016-6), UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) grant BB/P016855/1 (Designing Future Wheat) and the Bilateral BBSRC-Embrapa Newton Fund project (BB/N019113/1).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: L.J.D. and P.C.P.; Methodology: L.J.D., P.C.P, and K.R.D.; Investigation: P.C.P, K.R.D., and T.N.M.; Writing – original draft: L.J.D., P.C.P, and K.R.D.; Writing – review and editing: L.J.D., P.C.P, and P.N..; Resources: L.J.D., P.C.P, and K.R.D.; Funding acquisition: L.J.D.; Supervision: L.J.D. and P.C.P.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Pazdiora, P.C., da Rosa Dorneles, K., Morello, T.N. et al. Silicon soil amendment as a complement to manage tan spot and fusarium head blight in wheat. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 41, 21 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-021-00677-0
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-021-00677-0