Abstract
Phosphorus (P) is an essential macronutrient required for the survival and reproduction of all living organisms. Its inorganic form (Pi) is taken up by the roots to support plant growth and development, and its availability directly determines agricultural productivity. The primary source of P replenishment in agriculture is chemical phosphate (Pi) fertilizers. While application of Pi-fertilizers to croplands ensures high yield agriculture, its intensive use leads to several environmental implications, including loss of soil fertility and pollution of water bodies with runoff fertilizer. Global non-renewable P-reserves are finite and would last for only a few hundred years. Therefore, a holistic approach is needed to combine Pi-use efficient germplasm with the targeted fertilization, agronomically superior fertilizer formulations for better P-management. The latest technologies to reclaim Pi from alternative sources need to be explored. In the present review, we first outline the challenges and environmental consequences of Pi-intensive fertilization, followed by plants' response and adaptive strategies to Pi starvation. Next, we discuss the role of microbes and Pi-nanofertilizer to plant Pi nutrition. Finally, a few cutting-edge technologies and innovative solutions available for reclaiming Pi from waste are argued.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Phosphorous (P) is unarguably one of the most important macronutrients, next to nitrogen, of all life forms on earth. It is an important constituent of macromolecules such as nucleic acids, sugar phosphates and phospholipids. P is also essential for the growth of new tissues and cell division in plants. P contributes to about 0.2% of the total dry weight of plants (Sulieman and Tran 2017). It is also indispensable to numerous vital metabolic and signaling processes such as photosynthesis, macromolecular interactions, energy transfer reactions, respiration, signal transduction (Khan et al. 2010), and nitrogen fixation (Kouas and Labidi, 2005). Paucity of P leads to inhibited photosynthesis. P is taken by the roots mainly in its inorganic forms (Bieleski 1973). Soils around the globe vary greatly from very high to very low in terms of the spatial distribution of P (https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/use/worldsoils/?cid=nrcs142p205401 4). MacDonald et al. (2011) has suggested that the soils in the majority of global agrosystems (~ 70%) is rich in P. Despite this, only a small percentage of soil P is often available to plants. A large fraction, amounting up to 80%, of total soil P is available in its organic form, especially as phytic acid (inositol hexaphosphate) (Anderson 1980; Alewell et al. 2020). According to an estimation, about half of the agricultural soils worldwide are deficient in P (Lynch 2011). Such deficiency in soils is either because of inadequate P replenishment into agrosystems (more likely in developing countries with limited access to fertilizers) or due to its fixation, which renders soil P unavailable to plants (Heuer et al. 2017). Thus, soil P may be copious in the soils of some regions, but its unrestricted availability to plants is not guaranteed. Therefore, chemical Pi-fertilizers are routinely applied to replenish the inorganic and bioavailable P deficiency in agricultural systems (Herrera-Estrella and López-Arredondo, 2016).
Due to the slow diffusion rate of P (10−12 to 10−15 m2s−1), its uptake by plants at high rates creates a depletion zone around the roots (Schachtman et al. 1998). Such Pi-depletion in the proximity of roots is often slowly alleviated. Therefore, Pi deficiency often leads to compromised plant growth (Lόpez-Bucio et al. 2000; Bindraban et al. 2020). The bioavailability of P is strongly affected by soil pH as mildly acidic soil pH favours its maximum solubility and plant availability. The formation of iron (Fe) and aluminum (Al) phosphate minerals such as strengite (FePO4.2H2O) and variscite (AlPO4.2H2O), respectively, reduce its bioavailability in strongly acidic soil (Richardson 2001). Likewise, in the alkaline pH (around 8), soil Pi reacts with calcium (Ca) and form insoluble Ca-Pi complexes (Haynes 1982; Wang and Nancollas, 2008; Hopkins and Ellsworth, 2005). Besides its fixation in the soils, P loss from farms due to leaching, erosion, and runoff also challenges its availability in the agro systems. Soil erosion is considered one of the primary contributors to such loss and is projected to critically challenge global P availability in agriculture systems in the future (Alewell et al. 2020; Simpson et al., 2011).
The global demand for Pi-fertilizers reached to approximately 21 million tons in 2015 (Bindraban et al. 2020). This is estimated to further increase in the future to 22–27 million tons per year for croplands. In terms of grasslands, an additional requirement of 4–12 million tons of P is projected (Mogollón et al. 2018). To meet the increasing demand, worldwide production of Pi-fertilizer has also increased to 50 million tonnes in 2020 (http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/RFN) (Fig. 1A). Although applying chemical Pi-fertilizers is integral to maintaining soil P fertility, their injudicious use in agricultural systems is known to affect soil health and crop growth, especially by disrupting the composition and function of soil microorganisms. For example, up to five-fold more Pi-fertilizer is applied to highly P-sorbing weathered and tropical soils (Simpson et al. 2011). Excessive Pi-fertilizers may reduce the microorganism's biodiversity that may become critical to crop health. Further, in the case of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF)-colonized plants, increased diversion of host carbon to the mycobiont may affect plants' produce (Buwalda and Goh, 1982; Jakobsen et al. 2005; Kaminsky et al. 2019; Liu et al. 2018a, b). Because of these reasons, scientific and technological interventions to either cut down on the overall Pi-usage in agriculture systems or reclaim Pi from waste become essential for its long-term management. Improving the agronomic efficiency (defined as the increase in grain yield per unit of applied fertilizer) of mineral fertilizers, that falls between 20–30% for the currently used chemical Pi-fertilizers (Syers et al. 2008; Van de Wiel et al., 2016), wo uld also contribute in prolonging the availability of this natural reserves. This review first outlines the current knowledge on the interrelationship between P (in Pi-fertilizers) and agricultural systems. We summarize the benefits as well as ecological implications associated with intensively fertilized agrosystems. Plant adaptive strategies to Pi deficiency and the role of microbial associations in improving Pi uptake by roots is discussed. Solutions to minimize the adverse effects associated with intensive fertilization in agriculture are also argued. Due to the extensive coverage of the molecular events underlying plant phosphorus responses and the cellular Pi signalling pathways in several recently published excellent review articles (Ham et al. 2018; Crombez et al. 2019; Guan et al. 2021; Wang et al. 2021a, b; Cho et al. 2021), we have avoided an in-depth coverage of these topics in this article.
Global phosphorus reserves are finite
P-reserves are a non-renewable resource that is asymmetrically distributed globally. Three countries, including Morocco and Western Sahara (71%), China (4.8%), and Algeria (3%), together hold most of the global natural rock phosphorous (RP) reserves (Survey USG 2020). The majority of the developing countries lack large natural indigenous P-reserves and meet their demand by importing RPs or finished fertilizers. In past decades, the production and demand for Pi-fertilizers has steadily increased (Fig. 1A). Numerous statistical analyses predict that the demand for Pi would further increase and reach its peak by 2030 (Cordell et al. 2009). Although there is no consensus on the exact time of the complete depletion of RPs, P-reserves are anticipated to exhaust in the next few hundred years (Gilbert 2009; Sattari et al. 2016; Ockenden et al. 2017). Thus, a potential P crisis is imminent in the recent future that would challenge the sustainability of agriculture.
Environmental consequences associated with intensive fertilization
Most chemical Pi-fertilizers are synthetic and are primarily obtained from RP extraction. RPs generally contain two principal phosphorous-containing minerals, fluorapatite (Ca5(PO4)3F) and hydroxyapatite (Ca5(PO4)3OH). Following the treatment with sulphuric and phosphoric acids, water-soluble Pi salts of these minerals are produced. Some of the major chemical Pi-fertilizers are; Ca and Al phosphates (MAP, MCP, DAP), monopotassium phosphate, and triple superphosphate (Hedley and McLaughlin, 2005). Du ring the production of chemical Pi-fertilizers, disposal of a waste by-product, phosphogypsum, has always been a concern to the environment. The fertilizers industry is known to contribute to the enhanced levels of radionuclides such as Uranium (238U), Radium (226Ra), and Thorium (232Th) in the environment (Sahu et al. 2014; Casacuberta and Masqué, 2011; da Conceição et al. 2012). PR deposits often contain heavy metals such as Cadmium (Cd). Applying Cd-contaminated fertilizers to croplands may affect soil fertility; therefore, many countries have set tolerance limits for heavy metal additions to the soils (Mortvedt, 1996). Du e to its toxic effects, Cd once entered into the food chain via plants, may pose a serious threat to human health. Cd concentration in the vegetable crops follows a linear correlation with its concentration in the soils and increases in the edible plant parts with its increasing amount in the rhizosphere (Huang et al. 2004; Othman 2007).
P security is indispensable to sustainable agriculture
Overreliance of countries on the foreign RP reserves is critical as any volatile geopolitical or economic crisis in the biggest RP supplier countries may compromise the supply of P to the importing nations (Jasinski 2011). A good example of such apprehension becoming reality is the global economic crisis of 2008. As a consequence of the financial meltdown, the prices of international Pi spiked from $50 per tonne to $430 per tonne (Jones et al. 2020). In such a scenario, countries such as India, primarily dependent on imported P products, were reported to be among the most affected nations due to their severe national shortage (Cordell et al. 2009; Elser and Bennett, 2011; Alewell et al., 2020). Further, the cost of RPs has significantly increased to $700 per ton in 2015 (Amundson et al. 2015). In India, any sudden fluctuation or sharp increase in RP prices is generally met by raising the fertilizers subsidy. It is reported that the Department of Fertilizers, the Government of India approved Rs. 26,335/- crore in 2019–2020, as the subsidy outgo, to provide cheaper P and K-fertilizers to farmers. This subsidy outgo has remained above Rs. 20,000/- crores in the last few years (Fig. 1B) (https://fert.nic.in/sites/default/files/2020-09/Annual-Report-2019-20.pdf).
Phosphate starvation response and adaptive strategies in plants
The Pi absorbed by roots from the soils are maily available in its orthophosphate forms such as H2PO4− or HPO42− (Mardamootoo et al. 2021). There are two primary P sources in the soils, (i) the native P and (ii) externally applied P, as organic or inorganic complexes. The bioavailability of Pi is generally limited in the soils due to its rapid fixation with cations such as Ca, Al, and Fe (Kochian et al. 2004; McLaughlin et al. 2011). These insoluble complexes together with the organic P pools (mainly the decomposed parts of the living organisms) make it poorly mobile in the soils (McLaughlin et al. 2011). To cope with Pi limitations, plants have acquired several adaptive strategies, collectively called Pi starvation responses (PSRs). These adaptive measures are employed to improve Pi uptake and internal mobilization for its better access to plants (Theodorou et al. 1993, Raghothama 1999; Zhang et al. 2014a, b).
Reprogramming of root system architecture
PSRs are classified into local and systemic responses (for detailed information on sensing and signaling of Pi starvation, please refer to recent review articles by Chien et al. 2018 and Ham et al. 2018). The profound structural modifications in plants under Pi deficiency unarguably occur in the root system architecture (RSA), a localized PSR (Williamson et al. 2001; Peret et al. 2014). Modifications in root system are triggered by local alterations in external Pi and sensed by the root tip under depleted Pi conditions (Svistoonoff et al. 2007). As plants assimilate Pi primarily via roots, the reprogramming of RSA under Pi deficiency is advantageous to improve nutrients foraging. Altered primary root length, increased lateral roots, and longer and denser root hairs are some of the well-studied morphological changes observed in the roots of Pi-deficient plants (Bates and Lynch, 1996; Ma et al. 2001; Yan et al. 2004). Formation of cluster roots and a decrease of root angles to a shallower position also occur in Pi-deprived plants(Borch et al. 1999; Dinkelaker et al. 1995; Kim et al. 2008). The development and functioning of cluster roots in white lupin and the Proteaceae family members is a well-studied strategy by plants to maximize Pi uptake from its enriched patches in the soils (Lambers and Finnegan, 2011; Lambers et al., 2013; Cheng et al. 2011; Skene and James, 2000). Si nce cluster roots in Proteaceae members are more prominent in the top layers of the soils, secretion of organic acids strategy is preferred over the P scavenging through root extension to mobilize sparingly available Pi (Rath et al. 2010). The decreased growth angle of basal roots is also considered an effective strategy to maximize Pi-acquisition from the top layers of the soil in several plant species (Bonser et al. 1996; Hodge et al. 2009). Modification of RSA is coordinated by the coaction of multiple plant hormones such as auxin, ethylene, cytokinin and strigolactones (Cheng et al. 2013; Crombez et al. 2019; Giri et al. 2018; Ruzicka et al. 2007; Muller et al. 2008). Recently, Song et al. (2016) have implicated ETHYLENE-INSENSITIVE3 (EIN3), a key transcriptional regulator of ethylene signaling and response, in the promotion of root hair growth under Pi depleted conditions. Similarly, in two separate studies by Giri et al. (2018) and Bhosale et al. (2018), a signalling module involving auxin synthesis, auxin transport and transcriptional regulators controlling low Pi promoted root hair growth in Arabidopsis has been revealed. Strigolactone or jasmonate have also been implicated in the Pi-related lateral root formation, although the underlying molecular mechanisms remains to be deciphered (Crombez et al. 2019; Sun et al. 2014; Raya-González et al. 2012). Although RSA modification is a common adaptive response in plants subjected to Pi deficiency, comparison of the low Pi-induced RSA in Arabidopsis and several other crop germplasms indicates that such response is genetically determined and is highly species-specific (Bhosale et al. 2018; Giri et al. 2018; Niu et al. 2013; Van de Wiel et al., 2016; Camacho-Cristóbal et al., 2008; Devaiah et al. 2007).
Metabolic strategies for Pi mineralization in the rhizosphere
Secretion of organic acids, protons, phosphatases, or ribonucleases by roots in the rhizosphere is an efficient mechanism adopted by plants to improve Pi-acquisition from the organic P and insoluble-Pi mineral complexes in the soils (Singh and Pandey, 2003; Heuer et al. 2017; Dissanayaka et al. 2021) (Fig. 2). It is a localized PSR that helps mobilize and enhance the bioavailability of the available Pi in the soils (Hinsinger 2001). Releasing protons or organic acids by Pi-deficient roots causes acidification of the rhizosphere. Consequent mineralization of insoluble Pi-complexes or organic P compounds results in the release of Pi in the rhizosphere. Root exudation of carboxylates such as citrate, malate, and oxalate mobilizes Pi from Al, Fe, or Ca complexes through chelation and ligand exchanges in the rhizosphere (Shen et al. 2011). In this context, the role of malate not only in the mineralization of soil bound P but also in controlling RSA under Pi depletion is well-studied. Mora-Macías et al. (2017) through characterization of two low-Pi insensitive Arabidopsis mutants (lpi5 and lpi6) revealed existence of a regulatory module involving SENSITIVE TO PROTON RHIZOTOXICITY (STOP1) and ALUMINUM ACTIVATED MALATE TRANSPORTER 1 (ALMT1) in controlling malate efflux in the root apex. Such malate efflux leads to the aggregation of Fe3+ ions in the apoplast, which blocks the symplastic channels due to callose deposition. The closing of symplastic channels eventually impairs the communication of root apical meristem (RAM) with the neighbouring cells, leading to seizure of cell proliferation and root meristematic activity. Overall the authors demonstrated that malate-dependent Fe accumulation regulates RSA reprogramming in Pi-starved Arabidopsis seedlings (Mora-Macías et al., 2017). The role of ALMT1 transporters in conferring plants tolerance to Al3+ is also well investigated. In acid soils, Al3+ toxicity inhibits root growth, leading to inadequate soil exploration capacity of such roots for nutrients uptake (Delhaize et al., 2012). Be cause Al3+ activates ALMT1 transporter genes, the secreted malate can solubilize complexed soil Pi from Al-P complexes in the acidic soils. Consistent with the proposed roles of ALMT1 genes in Al3+ toxicity and Pi starvation, barley lines expressing an ALMT1 gene from wheat exhibited improved Al3+ tolerance and Pi uptake when grown in acidic soil (Delhaize et al. 2009). Zhang et al. (2020) have further demonstrated a similar interrelationship between Pi and Fe. A low Pi supply promoted organic acids exudation and simultaneously enhanced Fe absorption during its deficiency in apples. Another critical strategy to improve Pi-mineralization is the secretion of phosphatases or phytases by Pi-starved roots. Their release mobilizes Pi from the organic phosphate complexes through enzyme-catalyzed hydrolysis (Shen et al. 2011). A large body of evidence has demonstrated the induction of numerous phosphatases encoding genes in many plant species under Pi deficiency (Baldwin et al. 2008; Del Vecchio et al. 2014; Gao et al. 2017; Mehra et al. 2017; Srivastava et al. 2020). Several purple acid phosphatases (PAPs) and haloacid halogenases have been implicated to increase PUE and PAE in plants. A summary of such selected studies is provided in Table 1.
Alteration related to Pi acquisition and transport
In plants, Pi uptake by roots (H2PO4− or H2PO42−) is maximum between pH 5–6. However, its uptake by roots is restricted by organic P assimilated in microbes and inorganic Al-P and Fe–P complexes in the soils. The acidic nature of soils, which account for ~ 30% of the total agricultural land worldwide, exacerbates this situation (Uexküll and Mutert, 1995). Further, due to the poor mobility of Pi (diffusion coefficient, 10−12 to 10−15 m2 s−1) in the soil, its active uptake by plants leads to a depleted Pi zone in the vicinity of roots (Furihata and Suzuki, 1992; Schachtman et al. 1998; Ullrich-Eberius et al. 1984). While Pi concentration in plant tissues ranges between 5–20 mM (Raghothama 1999), it remains mostly less than 10 μM in the soils (Bieleski, 1973). This massive difference in Pi concentration between plants and rhizosphere highlights the indispensable role of phosphate transporters (PHTs) in its acquisition. A suite of root-tip localized high-affinity Pi-transporters (HATs) is activated under acute Pi shortage in the soils (Poirier and Bucher, 2002). The PHT1 family of Pi-transporters is an excellent example of HATs. These proteins are highly conserved from fungi to plants. They are involved in the active transport of Pi from the soil to root hair cells (Nussaume 2011). Another class of protein, PHO1, containing the SPX-EXS domain, is critical to Pi transport from roots to shoots (Hamburger et al. 2002).
Intracellular Pi allocation and transfer between the cytoplasm and cellular compartments, including chloroplast, mitochondria, Golgi apparatuses, and vacuoles, contributes to Pi-homeostasis, especially under Pi deprivation. The non-metabolic vacuolar Pi is transported from the vacuole to the chloroplast (site of photosynthesis) and cytoplasm (site of glycolysis and sugar synthesis) under Pi deficiency (Poirier and Bucher, 2002). Different classes of transporters, PHT2 (chloroplast), PHT3 (mitochondria), PHT4 (Golgi apparatus), and PHT5 (vacuoles), are involved in such transfer and management of intracellular Pi pools (Sun et al. 2017). PHT5 class of Pi transporters is critical for the influx and efflux of Pi in and out of vacuoles (Liu et al. 2015, 2016). Recently, three vacuolar Pi transporters (VPTs), belonging to the SPX-MFS [SYG1/Pho81/XPR1 (SPX)-Major Facility Superfamily (MFS)] class, were identified in Arabidopsis. The biophysical studies on isolated vacuoles established PHT5;1 as the main vacuolar Pi influx transporter. Arabidopsis transgenic plants overexpressing this gene were found to sequester more Pi in their vacuoles. These plants also showed a higher vacuolar-to-cytosolic Pi ratio over their wild type controls, indicating importance of these genes to plant adaptation under nonuniform Pi availability in the soils. Similarly, PHT5 class members have been identified in rice. The functional studies revealed that OsSPX-MFS1 functions as a vacuolar Pi influx transporter, similar to its AtPHT5;1 homolog. Contrastingly, the other gene family member, SPX-MFS3, was found to function as an efflux VPT (Wang et al. 2015). For a more detailed outlook on PHTs, including gene expression, intracellular localization, and functions, two review articles recently published by Gu et al. (2016) and Wang et al. (2021a, b) are recommended for further reading.
Metabolic strategies for intracellular Pi homeostasis
Pi deficiency profoundly affects plants' carbon fixation, glycolysis, and respiration (Plaxton and Tran, 2011). Reducing the ATP demand to recycle and optimize internal Pi use is another metabolic strategy to mitigate its deficiency by plants (Cruz-Ramírez et al., 2006). Activation of inorganic pyrophosphate-dependent bypass enzymes is crucial for the metabolic adaptations of plants under depleted cellular Pi (Plaxton and Tran, 2011). Such changes facilitate the carbon flux for the enhanced synthesis of organic acids in the glycolytic pathway under chronic Pi limitation and help plant survival under depleted ATP levels (Plaxton and Tran, 2011). Up-regulation of alternative oxidases in mitochondria also contributes to such adaptation by maintaining the mitochondrial citric acid cycle and electron transport chain with impaired ATP production, especially under long-term starvation (Sieger et al. 2005; Plaxton and Podestá, 2006). During Pi starvation, enhanced sugar mobilization from shoot to roots occurs to support reprogramming of RSA (Hammond and White, 2008; Ciereszko et al. 2005). Further, root sugar levels seem vital for the secretion and activity of root-associated acid phosphatase as a mutation in a sucrose transporter gene (SUC2) lowered such activity in mutant Arabidopsis seedlings and impacted Pi uptake (Zakhleniuk et al. 2001). Emerging evidence suggests that exogenous sucrose supply under Pi starvation conditions enhances the activation level of several Pi starvation inducible (PSI) genes in plants, highlighting the importance of sugar signaling to PSRs (Karthikeyan et al. 2007; Akash et al. 2021; Srivastava et al. 2021; Khurana and Akash, 2021).
Remodeling of membrane lipids is another prominent alternate mechanism for Pi uptake under its acute deficiency. In such conditions, membrane phospholipids are converted into galactolipids. First, phospholipids, such as phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylserine, phosphatidylethanolamine are converted into diacylglycerol (DAG), which is then converted into galactolipids such as monogalactosyldiacylglycerol (MGDG) or digalactosyldiacylglycerol (DGDG). MGDG and DGDG synthetases catalyze these reactions (Nakamura 2013; Okazaki et al. 2013; Pant and Burgos, 2015). A recent article published by Dissanayaka et al. (2021) has provided an in-depth overview of metabolic adaptations during PSRs in plants, including the mechanisms underlying phospholipid to galacto- and sulpholipid conversation under Pi starvation.
Strategies for improving Pi-use-efficiency (PUE)
Alternate Pi-sources and its recycling
Unearthing alternate Pi sources is critical to reducing over-reliance on the import of RPs. For example, phosphite (Phi), which has a higher solubility in water and is less prone to fixation in the soil, may be exploited as an alternate Pi-fertilizer (Heuer et al. 2017). Attempts have been made to develop bioengineered plants with the potential to utilize Phi as Pi-fertilizer (López-Arredondo and Herrera-Estrella, 2012). Expression of phosphite oxidoreductase (ptxD) enzyme coding gene in Arabidopsis helped transgenic plants efficiently convert Phi to Pi after its uptake by the roots. These bioengineered plants only required 50 to 70% of the original Pi input to achieve maximum productivity with Phi. Likewise, nuclear expression of ptxD in C. reinhardtii rendered transgenic lines the advantage of successfully metabolizing Phi as its Pi source(Loera-Quezada et al. 2016). Nonetheless, the natural inability of plants to metabolize Phi combined with high production cost and toxicity remains a bottleneck in its way to become a sustainable alternative to Pi-fertilizers. Further, due to its herbicidal properties, the use of Phi is banned in several European countries. Although the usage of Phi as an alternative Pi-fertilizer under the present scenario seems unrealistic, the development of Phi metabolizing plants which offers an alternative strategy to target both Pi nutrition with weed control cannot be neglected (Thao and Yamakawa, 2019; Heuer et al., 2017; Manna et al. 2016).
The amount of annually produced organic waste in big developing countries is enormous. Several available innovative technologies could be helpful for recycling and extracting Pi from urban, industrial, and agricultural waste. A few such technologies are already in place in Europe. For instance, sewage sludge ash is considered one of the best Pi sources across many European countries. Theoretically, it could meet 40–50% of annually applied Pi-fertilizer input in agriculture in central Europe (Egle et al. 2016; Zoboli et al. 2016). However, one of the biggest concerns about recovering Pi from municipal waste is its contamination with heavy metals and organic micropollutants. Therefore, modern techniques should be explored to recover Pi from sewage sludge with minimum contaminants. A cue in this context can be taken from a recently published article by Egle et al. (2016). The authors compared a total of 19 relevant Pi recovering technologies by considering their relationships with existing wastewater and sludge treatments. The outcome indicates that while clean and plant-available Pi is recoverable from municipal wastewater, the overall recovery remains poor. The present situation demands further technological innovations to improve the efficiency of the comprehensive Pi reclamation.
Identification and development of P-use-efficient crops
As per the definition by Hammond and White (2008), PUE is defined as the amount of total biomass or yield produced per unit of absorbed P. Plants are unable to assimilate majority of the applied Pi-fertilizers (Syers et al. 2008). One of the effective measures that have been suggested to significantly bring down the scale of Pi-fertilizers input in agricultural systems is the identification of crop germplasm with better internal PUE and Pi-acquisition. The high PUE genotypes would efficiently mobilize residual soil P. Although PUE involves a complex set of plant traits, two basic mechanisms are central to it. First, the root's ability to reclaim residual Pi from the soil (also known as Pi-acquisition efficiency, PAE; or external PUE). Generally, crops germplasm with higher P scavenging capacity is recommended for soils particularly rich in organic P and insoluble Pi-complexes. Second, the efficiency of internal remobilization of Pi for sustainable biomass production (also known as the internal PUE). In the second scenario, crop genotypes which can give better yield in under-fertilized soils are recommended (Lynch 2007). While identifying crops germplasm with better PAE can immediately bring down the amount of Pi-fertilizers used in agricultural systems, the development of enhanced internal PUE crops holds a long-term and more desirable sustainable solution (Rose and Wissuwa, 2012). It has been suggested that improving internal PUE (i.e. economic use of P in plants) for the better utilization of already available internal Pi pool for biomass production could prove a more resource-efficient approach in plants (Veneklaas et al. 2012). For example, high concentrations of P in cereal grains (largely present in the indigestible bound form as phytate) remains underutilized by human and animals. Therefore, developing cereal crop genotypes that accumulate less phytate in their grains but with similar yield potentials would lower P extraction from soils, requiring subsequently less Pi-input to restore soil P balance in the next crop cycle.
Although external PUE accessions are known for several crops such as maize, rice, legumes, Brassica, more efforts should be made to identify such germplasm for all crops (Ganie et al. 2015). For identification of high PUE crop accessions, root architectural traits for enhanced Pi foraging capacity, such as increased number of lateral roots/lateral root branching, denser and longer root hairs, more crown/proteoid/cluster/adventitious roots with shallower growth angles of growth have been suggested (Lynch 2007; Peret et al., 2014). For example, both longer and more dense root hairs are an attribute of Pi-efficient genotypes of common bean (Yan et al. 2004). More lateral roots by plants under Pi deficiency improve possibilities of P scavenging (Lynch 2007). However, such phenotypes may not always confer increased Pi uptake capacity in all crops. Further, monitoring these traits in the soils remains highly challenging. While increased branching capacity of plant roots may enhance their nutrients foraging capacity, this approach might only partially mitigate the P demand due to the heterogenous distribution of P in the topsoil. Therefore, engineering plants roots responding only to P-enriched patches in the context of a higher number of lateral roots or localized higher root hair density in low P soils may offer a better strategy (Richardson et al. 2011; Van et al. 2016).
To identify high PUE genotypes, the rhizosphere can be further analyzed for root exudates, mainly for the protons, organic acids, and hydrolytic enzymes. Pi-efficient genotypes in several plant species may release a higher volume of organic acids in the rhizosphere than the Pi-inefficient genotypes (Lyu et al. 2016). In a recent study, Wen et al. (2019) investigated root functional traits under Pi deficiency in 16 crop species and reported that substantial interspecific variations exist for these traits among the species. For examples, species with thinner roots relied more on intense root branching for Pi scavenging whereas species exhibiting thicker roots depended more on the secretion of root exudates for the mobilization of bound P in the rhizosphere (Wen et al. 2019). Similarly, Lyu et al. (2016) rep orted that legumes such as white lupin and chickpea, lacking the fibrous roots (present in cereal species) relies more on exudation of organic acids to mobilize Pi in the rhizosphere than wheat and maize. A root exudation index has been proposed to be useful biomarker for the identification of genotpes with enhanced PAE (Dissanayaka et al. 2021). However, during such screening, care must be taken as this trait is insufficiently consistent and may vary among plant species. For instance, Pearse et al. (2007) reported that despite the exudation of citrate, pea could not mobilize Pi from Al-P and Fe–P complexes. It has also been observed that organic acids become unstable in both acid and calcareous soils and quickly lost after degradation (Wang et al. 2010). Several attempts have already been made to improve PUE in multiple crops. In this context, Zhang et al. (2014a, b) have provided information on candidate genes that have been been explored to improve PUE in different crops. Although genotypes with the enhanced secretion of organic acid in the rhizosphere seems an exciting choice, however, it has been reported that in some species the metabolic investment of the plants in producing these exudates is quite substantial (Lynch and Whipps, 1990; Nguyen 2003; Rees et al. 2005). In some Proteaceae members and white lupin, the volume of secreted products may amount for ~ 25% of whole plant dry weight (Gardner et al. 1983; Dinkelaker et al. 1989). In white lupin, up to 25% of total photosynthetes are diverted as sucrose to cluster roots by Pi-depleted plants to support the enhanced root exudation in the rhizosphere (Canarini et al. 2019). Especially under Pi stress, rice root exudates attributed to 2–3% of total plant biomass (Kirk et al. 1999). For minimizing the carbon costs, the alternative respiratory pathway that is non-phosphorylating in nature (cyanide resistant pathway and rotenone insensitive pathway) should be focused. This pathway allows respiration to proceed without depleting phosphate or adenylate pools and is induced under Pi-deprived conditions (Rychter et al. 1992; Theodorou and Plaxton, 1993). Similarly, shifting the biomass allocation towards metabolically efficient root classes, such as adventitious roots, can also enable us to efficiently utilize the soil Pi reserve (Miller et al. 2003).
Alternatively, improving more efficient internal P usage under its unavailability offer a better solution. Genotypes with effective P mobilization within plants, such as its mobilization from mature/senescing organs to newly emerging/actively growing organs or its recycling between vacuoles and cytoplasm for most crops, must be identified. Akhtar et al., 2008 demonstrated that efficient Pi internal mobilization contributed to the high PUE observed in some Brassica cultivars. Early growth and development of germinating seedlings are supported by seed stored P (White and Veneklaas, 2012). The high amount of seed/grain P in cereal crops remains under metabolized by humans and monogastric herbivores (Veneklaas et al. 2012). Therefore, developing crops with significantly lower seed phytate levels is often advised. However, low phytate levels may lead to compromised seed vigor, and targeted fertilization may overcome such a situation. For example, seed coating with Pi-fertilizers, especially the nano-formulations (such as nano-DAP; Singh et al. 2021) could provide a viable solution to compensate low seed phytate levels. Nonetheless, more investigations are needed to create such combinations of modified crops and nano-P formulations to assess their performance in agriculture.
Another area to improve internal PUE is by using specific phosphatases involved in internal Pi re-allocation. Acidic phosphatases (APases) are know to libertate Pi from its monoesters in a mildly acidic pH range (Tran et al. 2010; Srivastava and Akash, 2020). PAPs constitute the largest family of APases. Several PAPs are known to actvate under Pi limitation conditions in plants. Activation of PAPs in shoot marks their importance in mobilization of Pi form intracellular monoesters and anhydrides during Pi deprivation or leaf senescence (Tran et al. 2010; Plaxton and Tran, 2011). Similarly, activation of root-specific PAPs help mineralize Pi from its extracellular organic compounds and insouluble inorganic complexes in the rhizosphere. Although little is known about phosphatases involved in internal re-allocation of Pi, Tang et al. (2013) have reported activation of such a gene, LaSAP1, in the roots of Pi-starved white lupin. An Arabidopsis thaliana PAP, AtPAP26, has been found to be critical for vacuolar Pi recycling during Pi deprivation and leaf senescence (Robinson et al. 2012; Dissanayaka et al. 2021). Similarly, transcript abundance analysis of AtPAP17 gene using Klepikova Atlas, available at TAIR revealed its highly specific high expression in the senescent leaf (https://www.arabidopsis.org/servlets/TairObject?id=38109&type=locus). Such a gene could be an ideal candidate for investigating its role in determining internal PUE. Alternatively, enhancing PUE by tweaking plant metabolism to lower P demand, as described in the earlier section, can be explored. In this context, metabolic adjustments done by the members of Proteaceae under Pi deficit conditions are fascinating. One of the critical adjustments undertaken by these members includes an investment of lower Pi resources in rRNA synthesis, especially plastid rRNA. This adjustment does not favor the production of those enzymes which requires P-containing metabolites during carbohydrate metabolism. It also leads to delinking of growth from the synthesis of photosynthetic machinery during early leaf development. Altogether, these adjustments have been found to contribute to a high photosynthetic PUE in the Proteaceae species in comparison to Arabidopsis and crops (Sulpice et al. 2014). Further, the role of sugar signaling in controlling the scale of transcriptional activation of selected PSI genes is exciting and demands further research for a better understanding on the role of sugars in controlling PUE.
Microorganisms for facilitating Pi acquisition in plants
Soil-based microorganisms are important for mobilizing tightly bound soil P to promote its availablity in rhizosphere (Richardson et al. 2011). Two reactions determine Pi fixation and uptake in the soils. The first process involves fixation of Pi onto soil particles, whereas the second involves the solubilization of bound Pi from the available inorganic complexes and organic P present in the soils (Havlin et al. 2005). Over decades, the frequent use of chemical fertilizers has impacted soil health (Gyaneshwar et al. 2002). Long-term P fertilization adversely affects soil fungal and bacterial diversity in croplands (Beauregard et al. 2010; Chen and Liu 2019; Chen et al. 2019). Excessive fertilization also leads to problems like inhibition of substrate-induced respiration by acitidione (activity observed in bacteria) and streptomycin sulfate (activity observed in fungus) (Bolan et al. 1996). Similarly, triple superphosphate application led to reduced microbial respiration and metabolic quotient (Thirukkumaran and Parkinson, 2002). Co nsidering the side-effects of excessive Pi-fertilization, more environmentally benign approaches such as use of Pi-solubilizing microbes (PSMs) as microbial inoculants are routinely carried out to improve crop production.
A vast number of microbial species have been identified with excellent Pi-solubilizing capacity. Such diversity includes bacteria, fungi, actinomycetes, and some algal species. Among bacteria, Pseudomonas and Bacillus species are the most well-known Pi-solubilizers. Rhodococcus, Arthrobacter, Serratia, Chryseobacterium, Gordonia, Phyllobacterium, Delftia, Azotobacter, Vibrio proteolyticus, Xanthobacter agilis, Xanthomonas, Enterobacter, Pantoea, and Klebsiella are some of the other significant Pi-solubilizing bacteria (Cheng et al., 2011; Kumar et al. 2011; de Freitas et al. 1997; Vazquez et al. 2000). Another excellent example of a Pi-solubilizing bacterium is the symbiotic nitrogenous rhizobia Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Trifoli. Besides nitrogen fixation, this bacteria has been reported to improve plant nutrition by mobilizing Pi from its inorganic and organic forms (Yanni et al. 2001). For a comprehensive account of the role of PSMs and strategies involved in facilitating Pi uptake, a recent review article by Rawat et al. (2020) is suggested for further reading.
Pi-solubilizing fungi consist of about 0.1 to 0.5% of the total fungal populations in the soils (Kucey 1983). Fungi are more suitable because these do not lose their Pi-solubilizing capabilities under laboratory conditions, which often limits the use of bacteria (Kucey 1983; Sperber 1958). Fungi traveling more distance (even beyond Pi depletion zones) in the soils via their hyphae greatly increases the possibility of P scavenging. AMFs directly deliver scavenged Pi to the root cortical cells (Bolan et al. 1991). In return, fungus obtains carbohydrates and lipids from the plant (Sawers et al. 2017). Almost 80% of plant species are known to have mycorrhizal associations (Schachtman et al. 1998). Hence, the solubilization of P present in the soil can be achieved more efficiently by fungi than bacteria (Kucey 1983). Since AMFs are naturally present in most soils, it is often difficult to notice their beneficiary role in Pi uptake in field conditions. Nevertheless, laboratory-scale pot experiments involving root colonization by AMF isolates under sterile soil conditions have revealed their positive role in Pi uptake by plants (Tawaraya, 2003; Deguchi et al. 2012). Among the filamentous fungi, Aspergillus and Penicillium species are the most significant Pi-solubilizers in the soils (Fenice et al. 2000; Khan et al. 2010; Reyes et al. 2002). A few Rhizoctonia solani and Trichoderma strains have also been reported as efficient Pi-solubilizers (Altomare et al. 1999; Jacobs and Boswell, 2002). Re cently, Srivastava et al. (2021) reported the positive role of Glomus species inoculation on barley seedlings' growth under the P-optimum nutritional regime. The AMFs-inoculated barley seedlings accumulated higher biomass with less Pi accumulation. Authors observed significantly enhanced PUE in the AMFs-colonized seedlings over their non AMF controls. While low Pi conditions support plant-AMFs interaction, high soil P conditions are often unfavourable for mycorrhization, although to varying degree in different species (Baylis 1967; Mosse et al. 1973; Johnson 1993; Van Geel et al. 2016). It is important to mention that the degree of success between plant-fungus association is influenced by host genetic factors as well; which tend to vary greatly with the change in the host species. A better understanding of the mechanisms underlying mineral uptake in croplands, especially host factors influencing plant mycorrhiza-mediated mineral nutrition, could be used to develop strategy for a resource-efficient sustainable agricultural system. Two recent review articles published by Sawers et al. (2017) and Kobae (2019) are recommended for further reading to understand the dynamics of the plant-fungus symbiotic associations.
Altogether, the collected evidence demonstrates that the native microbes in the rhizosphere help improve nutrient uptake. However, their commercial application as bio-inoculants has produced mixed results. One of the reasons for this observation could be that an alien microbe species, used as a bio-inoculant, can compete with native microbes of the rhizosphere and limit their overall nutrient-use efficiency. Therefore, knowing native microbe populations associated with different crops is a prerequisite before using any microbe as a bio-inoculant. Recent metagenomics studies providing insights into the structure and biodiversity of rhizosphere microbiomes for different crops in different soils are encouraging. Such information is useful to understand co-evolved diversity and host-microorganisms dynamics. For example, Chalasani et al. 2021 recently showed that non-symbiotic Rhizobium spp predominantly colonizes pigeon pea roots, rather than symbiotic Bradyrhizobium spp in Indian soils. Additionally, the data provided insights into the factors controlling pigeon pea bacterial community structure. Plant fraction, followed by developmental stage, soil type, and although the least important yet still a significant factor, plant genotypes influenced the bacterial community. Similarly, a genome-wide association study targeting to understand population-level microbiome analysis of the rhizospheres of 200 sorghum genotypes revealed a putative plant loci that control the heritability of the rhizosphere microbiome (Deng et al. 2021). Such data would be useful in devising effective ways to utilize species-specific bacterial/fungal partners to improve overall fertilizers' nutrient-use efficiency.
Nanofertilizers
The currently used chemical fertilizers have a major problem with their agronomic efficiency (Kah et al. 2018). Currently used mineral fertilizers are inefficient and needed in substantial quantity to support agricultural systems. Moreover, the granular forms need a massive amount of water for their dispersal. Advanced technology-based solutions such as nanotechnology are being explored to improve the delivery of the plants' macro-and micro-nutrients (such as P, N, and Zn). For instance, the application of urea-hydroxyapatite nanohybrids (for the slow release of nitrogen) in the rice fields significantly enhanced the agronomic use efficiency of urea. The field trial data clearly showed that the nanohybrids were translated directly to enhanced plant availability and growth while reducing the nitrogen content used by up to 50% (Kottegoda et al. 2017). Similarly, we also noticed the promotion of vegetative growth of monocot and dicot species after applying a reduced amount of cryo-milled diammonium phosphate nanoparticles (nDAP) over granular DAP (Singh et al. 2021). In this novel approach, the cryo-milling method was used to produce ~ 5000 times smaller particles of nDAP over the granular DAP (cDAP). A comparative study using different concentrations of nDAP and cDAP to investigate their effects on plant growth showed cDAP grown tomato and wheat seedlings being outperformed in biomass production by their equimolar nDAP grown counterparts. The nDAP grown seedlings consistently accumulated more Pi than their cDAP grown controls in all concentrations, indicating the beneficial role of reduced-sized Pi-fertilizers in plant growth promotion (Singh et al. 2021).
Precision farming
Precision agriculture is the method of implicating innovative and efficient technological advancements into agriculture for its betterment. Among the different environmental elements, the soil is the most exposed component in terms of excessive fertilization. Incorrect dosage or over-fertilization can increase soil salinity and acidity and also increase the risk of heavy metal contamination. Precision agriculture shows the way of appropriate fertilizer application by firmly moderating fertilizer doses based on the plant species. It also enables the application of fertilizers based on weather conditions and soil conditions (Adamchuk et al. 2004; Mikula et al. 2020). Whereas this approach has been discussed for micronutrient delivery, with emerging macronutrient nano-formulations, the concept for a more controlled delivery of these fertilizers holds a promising future. In this context, Indian Farmers Fertiliser Cooperative Limited (IFFCO), an Indian fertilizer company, has launched the world's first environment-friendly nano Urea (liquid) fertilizer (https://iffco.in/assets/images/IFFCO-Nano_PressNote-converted.pdf). Approximately, 10,000 times smaller nanoscale nitrogen particles than a Urea pril constitute the liquid fertilizer solution. As per the available information, the uptake efficiency of nano Urea is significantly increased over its prill form. Besides higher nutrient use efficiency, nano Urea is expected to reduce soil, water, and air pollution (https://iffco.in/index.php/ourproducts/index/nano-urea). The implication of Slow Released Fertilizers (SRFs) and Controlled Release Fertilizers (CRFs) can aid the nutritional needs of the plants while preventing excessive applications. Metaphosphates, glassphosphates have provided significant beneficiary results in terms of SRFs (Arslanoglu, 2019). Al together, the application of nano fertilizers would prove to be a big step towards the ultimatum of sustainable agriculture (Mikula et al. 2020).
Comprehensive national policy on P import, use and recycle
Sustainable P-reserves for the future depends on innovative ideas and actions. Creative solutions can ensure the continued availability of Pi-reserves to agriculture. The uninterrupted supply and sustainable Pi-use will require several factors to consider, including.
-
i.
Global, local, and integrated P management are necessary for P-poor countries to ensure the benefits and cost of production getting distributed equitably.
-
ii.
Crop germplasm with improved PAE and internal PUE needs to be identified to maximize the agricultural produce.
-
iii.
Innovative farming technologies and farmer education regarding sustainable agriculture can also help to maximize sustainable Pi-use.
-
iv.
Maximization of knowledge transfer and communication between stakeholders, commercial industries, and sectors like mining and fertilizer industries is essential. A collective effort from every sector can only guarantee the sustainability of Pi.
Sustainable Pi-use in Europe: a case study
-
i.
A city-level study conducted in Gothenberg, Sweden, suggested a possible management strategy to separate 70% of the food waste from households and business sectors (Kalmykova and Strömvall, 2012). Th e city was estimated to produce 88 tons of P annually, which could return to agriculture after reclamation. It was further noticed that the implementation of the urine diversion also has similar potential. Segregation of blackwater and food waste could provide the best results regarding the complete recycling of P-based nutrients. The authors estimated the potential for the annual recovery of 245 tons of Pi from different city waste products for agriculture.
-
ii.
Recently, De Buck et al. (2012) suggested another action plan on a country basis by studying the Netherlands' agricultural system. The authors considered a range of scenarios that could return the surplus Pi to the farming fields. The improved farming solutions include removing excess Pi from the harvested products, balanced fertilization techniques, and feeding concentrates for livestock containing 10% less Pi.
-
iii.
The P-Rex project in Europe implemented new technologies for recycling and the sustainable use of Pi. This project demonstrated technical solutions regarding the recovery and recycling of Pi in full scale. The P-Rex project continued till 2015 and has hugely benefitted the Pi-reserves throughout the continent (Schoumans et al. 2015).
-
iv.
Numerous technologies such as Air prex, ANPHOS, Aarhus Water, Budenheim, LysoGest, Nuresys, PEARL, Phospac, P-ROC have been widely used in different European countries to obtain Pi-from the wastewater (Schoumans et al. 2015). Products like Struvite, CaP, P mineral, DCP, P4 have been used as agents to separate P and P-based compounds from wastewater in these processes.
Conclusions and future perspectives
The increasing demand, high price, soil health, and environmental consequences of intensive Pi fertilization along with finite nature of natural rock phosphate reserves demand more efficient use of this resource in agricultural systems. Unlike the other non-renewable resources such as fossil fuels, where alternate strategies are already available; Pi-fertilizers have no alternative or replacement (Herrera Estrella et al. 2016). P shortage is being speculated to challenge food security in the future. Such a crisis could be more severe in countries lacking large indigenous P-reserves (Subba Rao et al. 2015). The present situation demands urgent development of a proper, holistic policy on P-management in agrosystems. The action plan should integrate all possible strategies, including reclaiming and recycling Pi from organic matter and urban and industrial waste. Simultaneously, low Pi-tolerant or Pi-use-efficient crops germplasm should be identified or developed. The development of agronomically superior fertilizers such as nano Urea and nano-DAP is critical to bringing down fertilizers' application in agrosystems. Additionally, the targeted delivery mechanisms such as mixing Pi-fertilizers with seeds before sowing are highly desirable and should be aggressively tested. Altogether, innovative sustainable techniques for reclaiming P from industrial, domestic, and agricultural waste, agronomically superior Pi-fertilizers alongwith high PAE/PUE crops germplasm hold the key for prolonging P-sustainibility in the future.
Abbreviations
- ATP:
-
Adenosine triphosphate
- Al:
-
Aluminum
- Ca:
-
Calcium
- CaP:
-
Calcium phosphate
- CSH:
-
Calcium silicate hydrate
- Cd:
-
Cadmium
- DAG:
-
Diacylglycerol
- DGDG:
-
Digalactosyldiacylglycerol
- nDAP:
-
Diammonium phosphate nanoparticle
- DCP:
-
Dicalcium phosphate
- MGDG:
-
Monogalactosyldiacylglycerol
- G3P:
-
Glycerol-3-phosphate
- G3PDH:
-
Glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
- GDPDs:
-
Glycerophosphodiester phosphodiesterase
- HATs:
-
High affinity transporters
- Fe:
-
Iron
- ITP:
-
Inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate
- LAH:
-
Lipid acyl hydrolase
- Mg:
-
Magnesium
- μM:
-
Micrometer
- N:
-
Nitrogen
- PHTs:
-
Phosphate transporters
- Pi:
-
Phosphate
- PUE:
-
Pi use efficiency
- Phi:
-
Phosphite
- ptxD:
-
Phosphite oxidoreductase
- PAE:
-
Phosphate acquisition efficiency
- PSR:
-
Phosphate starvation responses
- PUE:
-
Phosphate use efficiency
- PAPs:
-
Purple acid phosphatase
- RP:
-
Rock phosphate
- R:
-
Radium
- RSA:
-
Root system architecture
- PHO1:
-
PHOSPHATE1
- Th:
-
Thorium
- U:
-
Uranium
- Zn:
-
Zinc
References
Adamchuk VI, Hummel JW, Morgan MT, Upadhyaya SK (2004) On-the-go soil sensors for precision agriculture. Comput Electron Agric 44:71–91
Akash PAP, Srivastava A, Mathur S, Sharma AK, Kumar R (2021) Identification, evolutionary profiling, and expression analysis of F-box superfamily genes under phosphate deficiency in tomato. J Plant Biochem Physiol 162:349–362
Akhtar MS, Oki Y, Adachi T (2008) Intraspecific variations of phosphorus absorption and remobilization, P forms, and their internal buffering in Brassica cultivars exposed to a P-stressed environment. J Integr Plant Biol 50:703–716
Alewell C, Ringeval B, Ballabio C, Robinson DA, Panagos P, Borrelli P (2020) Global phosphorous shortage will be aggravated by soil erosion. Nat Commun 11:1–2
Altomare C, Norvell W, Björkman T, Harman GE (1999) Solubilization of phosphates and micronutrients by the plant-growth-promoting and biocontrol fungus Trichoderma harzianum Rifai. Am Soc Microbiol 65:2926–2933
Amundson R, Berhe AA, Hopmans JW, Olson C, Sztein AE, Sparks DL (2015) Soil and human security in the 21st century. Sci 348:6235
Anderson G (1980) Assessing organic phosphorus in soils. The role of phosphorus in agriculture, pp 411–31
Arslanoglu H (2019) Adsorption of micronutrient metal ion onto struvite to prepare slow release multielement fertilizer: copper (II) doped-struvite. Chemosphere 217:393–401
Baldwin JC, Karthikeyan AS, Cao A, Raghothama KG (2008) Biochemical and molecular analysis of LePS2;1: a phosphate starvation induced protein phosphatase gene from tomato. Planta 228:273–280
Bates TR, Lynch JP (1996) Stimulation of root hair elongation in Arabidopsis thaliana by low phosphorus availability. Plant Cell Environ 19:529–538
Baylis GT (1967) Experiments on the ecological significance of phycomycetous mycorrhizas. New Phytol 66:231–243
Beauregard MS, Hamel C, St-Arnaud M (2010) Long-term phosphorus fertilization impacts soil fungal and bacterial diversity but not AM fungal community in alfalfa. Microb Ecol 59:379–389
Bhosale R, Giri J, Pandey BK (2018) A mechanistic framework for auxin dependent Arabidopsis root hair elongation to low external phosphate. Nat Commun 9:1409
Bieleski RL (1973) Phosphate pools, phosphate transport, and phosphate availability. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 1973:225–252
Bindraban PS, Dimkpa CO, Pandey R (2020) Exploring phosphorus fertilizers and fertilization strategies for improved human and environmental health. Biol Fertil Soils 56:293–317
Bolan NS, Currie LD, Baskaran S (1996) Assessment of the influence of phosphate fertilizers on the microbial activity of pasture soils. Biol Fertil Soils 21:284–292
Bonser AM, Lynch J, Snapp S (1996) Effect of phosphorus deficiency on growth angle of basal roots in Phaseolus vulgaris. New Phytol 132:281–288
Borch K, Bouma TJ, Lynch JP, Brown KM (1999) Ethylene: a regulator of root architectural responses to soil phosphorus availability. Plant Cell Environ 22:425–431
De Buck AJ, van Dijk W, van Middelkoop JC (2012) Agricultural scenarios to reduce the national phosphorus surplus in the Netherlands. Ppo Agv https://edepot.wur.nl/247486
Buwalda JG, Goh KM (1982) Host-fungus competition for carbon as a cause of growth depressions in vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal ryegrass. Soil Biol Biochem 14:103–106
Camacho-Cristóbal JJ, Rexach J, Conéjéro G, Al-Ghazi Y, Nacry P, Doumas P (2008) PRD, an Arabidopsis AINTEGUMENTA-like gene, is involved in root architectural changes in response to phosphate starvation. Planta 228:511–522
Canarini A, Kaiser C, Merchant A, Richter A, Wanek W (2019) Root exudation of primary metabolites: mechanisms and their roles in plant responses to environmental stimuli. Front Plant Sci 10:157
Casacuberta N, Masqué P (2011) Fluxes of 238U decay series radionuclides in a dicalcium phosphate industrial plant. J Hazard Mater 190:245–252
Chalasani D, Basu A, Pullabhotla SV, Jorrin B, Neal AL, Poole PS, Podile AR, Tkacz A (2021) Poor competitiveness of Bradyrhizobium in Pigeon pea root colonization in Indian. Soils Mbio 12:e00423-e521
Chen Q, Liu S (2019) Identification and characterization of the phosphate-solubilizing bacterium Pantoea sp. S32 in reclamation soil in Shanxi. China Front Microbiol 10:2171
Chen X, Jiang N, Condron LM, Dunfield KE, Chen Z, Wang J, Chen L (2019) Impact of long-term phosphorus fertilizer inputs on bacterial phoD gene community in a maize field. Northeast China Sci Total Environ 669:1011–1018
Cheng L, Bucciarelli B, Shen J, Allan D, Vance CP (2011) Update on white lupin cluster root acclimation to phosphorus deficiency update on lupin cluster roots. Plant Physiol 156:1025–1032
Cheng X, Ruyter-Spira C, Bouwmeester H (2013) The interaction between strigolactones and other plant hormones in the regulation of plant development. Front Plant Sci 4:199
Chien PS, Chiang CP, Leong SJ, Chiou TJ (2018) Sensing and signaling of phosphate starvation: from local to long distance. Plant Cell Physiol 59:1714–1722
Cho H, Bouain N, Zheng L, Rouached H (2021) Plant resilience to phosphate limitation: current knowledge and future challenges. Crit Rev Biotechnol 41:63–71
Ciereszko I, Johansson H, Kleczkowski LA (2005) Interactive effects of phosphate deficiency, sucrose and light/dark conditions on gene expression of UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase in Arabidopsis. J Plant Physiol 162:343–353
Cordell D, Drangert JO, White S (2009) The story of phosphorus: Global food security and food for thought. Glob Environ Change 19:292–305
Crombez H, Motte H, Beeckman T (2019) Tackling plant phosphate starvation by the roots. Dev Cell 48:599–615
Cruz-Ramírez A, Oropeza-Aburto A, Razo-Hernández F (2006) Phospholipase DZ2 plays an important role in extraplastidic galactolipid biosynthesis and phosphate recycling in Arabidopsis roots. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:6765–6770
Da Conceição FT, Antunes MLP, Durrant SF (2012) Radionuclide concentrations in raw and purified phosphoric acids from Brazil and their processing wastes: implications for radiation exposures. Environ Geochem Health 34:103–111
De Freitas JR, Banerjee MR, Germida JJ (1997) Phosphate-solubilizing rhizobacteria enhance the growth and yield but not phosphorus uptake of canola (Brassica napus L.). Biol Fert Soils 24:358–364
Deguchi S, Uozumi S, Touno E, Kaneko M, Tawaraya K (2012) Arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization increases phosphorus uptake and growth of corn in a white clover living mulch system. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 58:169–172
Del Vecchio HA, Ying S, Park J (2014) The cell wall-targeted purple acid phosphatase AtPAP25 is critical for acclimation of Arabidopsis thaliana to nutritional phosphorus deprivation. Plant J 80:569–581
Delhaize E, Taylor P, Hocking PJ, Simpson RJ, Ryan PR, Richardson AE (2009) Transgenic barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) expressing the wheat aluminium resistance gene (TaALMT1) shows enhanced phosphorus nutrition and grain production when grown on an acid soil. Plant Biotech J 7:391–400
Delhaize E, Ma JF, Ryan PR (2012) Transcriptional regulation of aluminium tolerance genes. Trends Plant Sci 17:341–348
Deng S, Lu L, Li J (2020) Purple acid phosphatase 10c encodes a major acid phosphatase that regulates plant growth under phosphate-deficient conditions in rice. J EXP Bot 71:4321–4332
Deng S, Caddell DF, Xu G, Dahlen L, Washington L, Yang J, Coleman-Derr D (2021) Genome wide association study reveals plant loci controlling heritability of the rhizosphere microbiome. ISME J 12:1–4
Devaiah BN, Karthikeyan AS, Raghothama KG (2007) WRKY75 transcription factor is a modulator of phosphate acquisition and root development in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 143:1789–1801
Dinkelaker B, Römheld V, Marschner H (1989) Citric acid excretion and precipitation of calcium citrate in the rhizosphere of white lupin (Lupinus albus L.). Plant Cell Environ 12:285–292
Dinkelaker B, Hengeler C, Marschner H (1995) Distribution and function of proteoid roots and other root clusters. Botanica Acta 108:183–200
Dissanayaka DM, Ghahremani M, Siebers M, Wasaki J, Plaxton WC (2021) Recent insights into the metabolic adaptations of phosphorus-deprived plants. J Exp Bot 72:199–223
Egle L, Rechberger H, Krampe J (2016) Phosphorus recovery from municipal wastewater: an integrated comparative technological, environmental and economic assessment of P recovery. Sci Total Environ 571:522–542
Elser J, Bennett E (2011) A broken biogeochemical cycle: excess phosphorus is polluting our environment while, ironically, mineable resources of this essential nutrient are limited. James Elser and elena bennett argue that recycling programmes are urgently needed. Nature 478:29–32
Fenice M, Selbman L, Federici F (2000) Application of encapsulated Penicillium variabile P16 in solubilization of rock phosphate. Bioresource Technol 73:157–162
Furihata T, Suzuki M (1992) Kinetic Characterization of Two Phosphate Uptake Systems with Different Affinities in Suspension-Cultured Catharanthus roseus Protoplasts. Plant Cell Physiol 33:1151–1157
Ganie AH, Ahmad A, Pandey R (2015) Metabolite profiling of low-p tolerant and Low-P sensitive maize genotypes under phosphorus starvation and restoration conditions. Plos One 10:e0129520
Gao W, Lu L, Qiu W (2017) OsPAP26 encodes a major purple acid phosphatase and regulates phosphate remobilization in rice. Plant Cell Physiol 58:885–892
Gardner WK, Barber DA, Parbery DG (1983) The acquisition of phosphorus by Lupinus albus L. Plant Soil 70:107–124
Gilbert N (2009) Environment: the disappearing nutrient. Nature 461:716–718
Giri J, Bhosale R, Huang G (2018) Rice auxin influx carrier OsAUX1 facilitates root hair elongation in response to low external phosphate. Nat Commun 9:1408
Gu M, Chen A, Sun S, Xu G (2016) Complex regulation of plant phosphate transporters and the gap between molecular mechanisms and practical application: what is missing? Mol Plant 9:396–416
Guan Z, Zhang Q, Zhang Z, Savarin J, Zuo J, Chen J, Broger L, Cheng P, Wang Q, Pei K, Zhang D (2021) Mechanistic insights into the regulation of plant phosphate homeostasis by the rice SPX2–PHR2 complex. Nat Portfolio. Doi:https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-653544/v1
Gyaneshwar P, Kumar G, Parekh L (2002) Role of soil microorganisms in improving P nutrition of plants. Plant Soil 245:83–93
Ham BK, Chen J, Yan Y, Lucas WJ (2018) Insights into plant phosphate sensing and signaling. Curr Opin Biotechnol 49:1–9
Hamburger D, Rezzonico E, MacDonald-Comber Petétot J, Somerville C, Poirier Y (2002) Identification and characterization of the Arabidopsis PHO1 gene involved in phosphate loading to the xylem. Plant Cell 14:889–902
Hammond JP, White PJ (2008) Sucrose transport in the phloem: integrating root responses to phosphorus starvation. J Exp Bot 59:93–109
Havlin J, Beaton J, Tisdale S, Nelson W (2005) Soil fertility and fertilizers: An introduction to nutrient management. Pearson Education, Inc. Pearson Prentice Hall. Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458 515:97–141
Haynes RJ (1982) Effects of liming on phosphate availability in acid soils. Plant Soil 68:289–308
Hedley M, McLaughlin M (2005) Reactions of phosphate fertilizers and by-products in soils. Phosphorus Agric Ecosyst Environ 46:181–252
Herrera-Estrella L, López-Arredondo D (2016) Phosphorus: the underrated element for feeding the world. Trends Plant Sci 21:461–463
Heuer S, Gaxiola R, Schilling R, Herrera-Estrella L, López-Arredondo D, Wissuwa M, Delhaize E, Rouached H (2017) Improving phosphorus use efficiency: a complex trait with emerging opportunities. The Plant J 90:868–885
Hinsinger P (2001) Bioavailability of soil inorganic P in the rhizosphere as affected by root-induced chemical changes: a review. Plant Soil 237:173–195
Hodge A, Berta G, Doussan C et al (2009) Plant root growth, architecture and function. Plant Soil 321:153–187
Holme IB, Dionisio G, Madsen CK, Brinch-Pedersen H (2017) Barley HvPAPhy_a as transgene provides high and stable phytase activities in mature barley straw and in grains. Plant Biotech J 15:415–422
Hopkins B, Ellsworth J (2005) Phosphorus availability with alkaline/calcareous soil. In western nutrient management conference vol 6, pp 88–93
Huang B, Kuo S, Bembenek R (2004) Availability of cadmium in some phosphorus fertilizers to field-grown lettuce. Water Air Soil Pollut 158:37–51
Hwang W, Park S, Shin D (2015) Enhanced organic phosphate utilization by over-expression of OsACP1 and OsPAP1 genes in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Philipp J Crop Sci 40:17–23
Jacobs H, Boswell G (2002) Solubilization of calcium phosphate as a consequence of carbon translocation by Rhizoctonia solani. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 40:65–71
Jakobsen I, Chen B, Munkvold L, Lundsgaard T, Zhu YG (2005) Contrasting phosphate acquisition of mycorrhizal fungi with that of root hairs using the root hairless barley mutant. Plant Cell Environ 28:928–938
Jasinski SM (2011) Phosphate rock. Mineral commodity summaries, pp 122–123
Johnson NC (1993) Can fertilization of soil select less mutualistic mycorrhizae? Ecol Appl 3:749–757
Jones JL, Yingling YG, Reaney IM, Westerhoff P (2020) Materials matter in phosphorus sustainability. MRS Bull 45:7–10
Kah M, Kookana R, Gogos A (2018) A critical evaluation of nanopesticides and nanofertilizers against their conventional analogues. Nature Nano 13:677–684
Kalmykova Y, Strömvall AM (2012) Risk assessment of contaminants leaching to groundwater in an infrastructure project. Urban Dev pp 413–423
Kaminsky LM, Trexler RV, Malik RJ, Hockett KL, Bell TH (2019) The inherent conflicts in developing soil microbial inoculants. Trends Biotechnol 37:140–151
Karthikeyan AS, Varadarajan DK, Jain A, Held MA, Carpita NC, Raghothama KG (2007) Phosphate starvation responses are mediated by sugar signaling in Arabidopsis. Planta 225:907–918
Khan MS, Zaidi A, Ahemad M (2010) Plant growth promotion by phosphate solubilizing fungi: current perspective. Arch Agron Soil Sci 56:73–98
Khurana A, Akash, Roychowdhury A (2021) Identification of phosphorus starvation inducible SnRK genes in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). J Plant Biochem Biotechnol
Kim HJ, Lynch JP, Brown KM (2008) Ethylene insensitivity impedes a subset of responses to phosphorus deficiency in tomato and petunia. Plant Cell Environ 31:1744–1755
Kirk GJ, Santos EE, Findenegg GR (1999) Phosphate solubilization by organic anion excretion from rice (Oryza sativa L.) growing in aerobic soil. Plant Soil 211:11–18
Kobae Y (2019) Dynamic phosphate uptake in arbuscular mycorrhizal roots under field conditions. Front Environ Sci 6:159
Kochian LV, Hoekenga OA, Piñeros MA (2004) How do crop plants tolerate acid soils? mechanisms of aluminum tolerance and phosphorous efficiency. Annu Rev Plant Biol 55:459–493
Kong Y, Li X, Ma J (2014) GmPAP4, a novel purple acid phosphatase gene isolated from soybean (Glycine max), enhanced extracellular phytate utilization in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Rep 33:655–667
Kong Y, Li X, Wang B (2018) The soybean purple acid phosphatase GmPAP14 predominantly enhances external phytate utilization in plants. Front Plant Sci 9:292
Kottegoda N, Sandaruwan C, Priyadarshana G (2017) Urea-Hydroxyapatite Nanohybrids for Slow Release of Nitrogen. ACS Nano 11:1214–1221
Kouas S, Labidi N (2005) Effect of P on nodule formation and N fixation in bean. Agron Sustain Dev 25:389–393
Kucey RMN (1983) Phosphate-solubilizing bacteria and fungi in various cultivated and virgin alberta soils. Can J Soil Sci 63:671–678
Kumar A, Prakash A, Johri BN (2011) Bacillus as PGPR in crop ecosystem. In Bacteria in agrobiology: crop ecosystems, 37–59. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18357-7_2
Lambers H, Ahmedi I, Berkowitz O, Dunne C, Finnegan PM, Hardy GE, Jost R, Laliberté E, Pearse SJ, Teste FP (2013) Phosphorus nutrition of phosphorus-sensitive Australian native plants: threats to plant communities in a global biodiversity hotspot. Conserv Physiol 1:cot010
Lambers H, Finnegan P (2011) Phosphorus nutrition of Proteaceae in severely phosphorus-impoverished soils: are there lessons to be learned for future crops? Plant Physiol 156:1058–1066
Li WYF, Shao G, Lam HM (2008) Ectopic expression of GmPAP3 alleviates oxidative damage caused by salinity and osmotic stresses. New Phytol 178:80–91
Li C, Li C, Zhang H (2016) The purple acid phosphatase GmPAP21 enhances internal\nphosphorus utilization and possibly plays a role in symbiosis\nwith rhizobia in soybean. Physiol Plant 159:215–227
Li C, Zhou J, Wang X, Liao H (2019) A purple acid phosphatase, GmPAP33, participates in arbuscule degeneration during arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in soybean. Plant Cell Environ 42:2015–2027
Liang C, Sun L, Yao Z (2012) Comparative analysis of PvPAP gene family and their functions in response to phosphorus deficiency in common bean. PLoS One 7:e38106
Liu J, Yang L, Luan M, Wang Y, Zhang C, Zhang B, Shi J, Zhao FG, Lan W, Luan S (2015) A vacuolar phosphate transporter essential for phosphate homeostasis in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112:E6571–E6578
Liu TY, Huang TK, Yang SY (2016) Identification of plant vacuolar transporters mediating phosphate storage. Nat Commun 7:1–11
Liu L, Li J, Yue F, Yan X, Wang F, Bloszies S, Wang Y (2018a) Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculation and biochar amendment on maize growth, cadmium uptake and soil cadmium speciation in Cd-contaminated soil. Chemosphere 194:495–503
Liu P, Cai Z, Chen Z (2018b) A root-associated purple acid phosphatase, SgPAP23, mediates extracellular phytate-P utilization in Stylosanthes guianensis. Plant Cell Environ 41:2821–2834
Loera-Quezada MM, Leyva-González MA, Velázquez-Juárez G (2016) A novel genetic engineering platform for the effective management of biological contaminants for the production of microalgae. Plant Biotechnol J 14:2066–2076
López-Arredondo DL, Herrera-Estrella L (2012) Engineering phosphorus metabolism in plants to produce a dual fertilization and weed control system. Nat Biotechnol 30:889–893
Lu L, Qiu W, Gao W (2016) OsPAP10c, a novel secreted acid phosphatase in rice, plays an important role in the utilization of external organic phosphorus. Plant Cell Environ 39:2247–2259
Lynch JP (2007) Roots of the second green revolution. Aust J Bot 55:493–512
Lynch JP (2011) Root phenes for enhanced soil exploration and phosphorus acquisition: tools for future crops. Plant Physiol 156:1041–1049
Lynch JM, Whipps JM (1990) Substrate flow in the rhizosphere. Plant Soil 129:1
Lyu Y, Tang H, Li H, Zhang F, Rengel Z, Whalley WR, Shen J (2016) Major crop species show differential balance between root morphological and physiological responses to variable phosphorus supply. Front Plant Sci 7:1939
Lόpez-Bucio J, de la Vega OM, Guevara-Garcia A, Herrera-Estrella L (2000) Enhanced phosphorus uptake in transgenic tobacco plants that overproduce citrate. Nat Biotechnol 18:450–453
Ma Z, Bielenberg DG, Brown KM, Lynch JP (2001) Regulation of root hair density by phosphorus availability in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Environ 24:459–467
Ma XF, Tudor S, Butler T (2012) Transgenic expression of phytase and acid phosphatase genes in alfalfa (Medicago sativa) leads to improved phosphate uptake in natural soils. Mol Breed 30:377–391
MacDonald GK, Bennett EM, Potter PA, Ramankutty N (2011) Agronomic phosphorus imbalances across the world’s croplands. Proc Nat Acad Sci 108:3086–3091
Manna M, Achary VM, Islam T, Agrawal PK, Reddy MK (2016) The development of a phosphite-mediated fertilization and weed control system for rice. Sci Rep 6:1–2
Mardamootoo T, Du Preez CC, Barnard JH (2021) Phosphorus management issues for crop production: A review. Afr J Agric Res 17:939–952
McLaughlin MJ, McBeath TM, Smernik R, Stacey SP, Ajiboye B, Guppy C (2011) The chemical nature of P accumulation in agricultural soils—implications for fertiliser management and design: an Australian perspective. Plant Soil 349:69–87
Mehra P, Pandey BK, Giri J (2017) Improvement in phosphate acquisition and utilization by a secretory purple acid phosphatase (OsPAP21b) in rice. Plant Biotechnol J 15:1054–1067
Mikula K, Izydorczyk G, Skrzypczak D, Mironiuk M, Moustakas K, Witek-Krowiak A, Chojnacka K (2020) Controlled release micronutrient fertilizers for precision agriculture: a review. Sci Total Environ 712:136365
Miller CR, Ochoa I, Nielsen KL, Beck D, Lynch JP (2003) Genetic variation for adventitious rooting in response to low phosphorus availability: potential utility for phosphorus acquisition from stratified soils. Funct Plant Biol 30:973–985
Mogollón JM, Beusen AH, Van Grinsven HJ, Westhoek H, Bouwman AF (2018) Future agricultural phosphorus demand according to the shared socioeconomic pathways. Glob Environ Change 50:149–163
Mora-Macías J, Ojeda-Rivera J.O, Gutiérrez-Alanís D, Yong-Villalobos L, Oropeza-Aburto A, Raya-González, J, Jiménez-Domínguez G, Chávez-Calvillo G, Rellán-Álvarez R, Herrera-Estrella L (2017) Malate-dependent Fe accumulation is a critical checkpoint in the root developmental response to low phosphate. Proc Natl Acad Sci 114:E3563–E3572
Mortvedt J (1996) Heavy metal contaminants in inorganic and organic fertilizers. Fertiliz Environ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1586-2_2
Mosse B, Hayman DS, Arnold DJ (1973) Plant growth responses to vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza v. phosphate uptake by three plant species from P-deficient soils labelled with 32P. New Phytol 72:809–815
Nakamura Y (2013) Phosphate starvation and membrane lipid remodeling in seed plants. Prog Lipid Res 52:43–50
Nguyen C (2003) Rhizodeposition of organic C by plants: mechanisms and controls. Agronomie 23:375–396
Niu YF, Chai RS, Jin GL (2013) Responses of root architecture development to low phosphorus availability: a review. Ann Bot 112:391–408
Nussaume L (2011) Phosphate import in plants: focus on the PHT1 transporters. Front Plant Sci 2:83
Ockenden MC, Hollaway MJ, Beven KJ, Collins AL, Evans R, Falloon PD, Forber KJ, Hiscock KM, Kahana R, Macleod CJ, Tych W (2017) Major agricultural changes required to mitigate phosphorus losses under climate change. Nat Commun 8:1–9
Okazaki Y, Otsuki H, Narisawa T (2013) A new class of plant lipid is essential for protection against phosphorus depletion. Nat Commun 4:1510
Othman I (2007) Impact of phosphate industry on the environment: a case study. Appl Radiat Isot 65:131–141
Pant B, Burgos A (2015) The transcription factor PHR1 regulates lipid remodeling and triacylglycerol accumulation in Arabidopsis thaliana during phosphorus starvation. J Exp Bot 66:1907–1918
Pearse SJ, Veneklaas EJ, Cawthray G (2007) Carboxylate composition of root exudates does not relate consistently to a crop species ability to use phosphorus from aluminium, iron or calcium phosphate sources. New Phytol 173:181–190
Peret B, Desnos T, Jost R (2014) Root architecture responses: in search of phosphate. Plant Physiol 166:1713–1723
Plaxton WC, Podestá FE (2006) The functional organization and control of plant respiration. Crit Rev Plant Sci 25:159–198
Plaxton WC, Tran HT (2011) Metabolic adaptations of phosphate-starved plants. Plant Physiol 156:1006–1015
Poirier Y, Bucher M (2002) Phosphate transport and homeostasis in Arabidopsis. The Arabidopsis Book. American Society of Plant Biologists pp 1–35. doi: https://doi.org/10.1199/tab.0024
Raghothama KG (1999) Phosphate acquisition. Annu Rev Plant Biol 50:665–693
Rath M, Salas J, Parhy B, Norton R, Menakuru H, Sommerhalter M, Hatlstad G, Kwon J, Allan DL, Vance CP, Uhde-Stone C (2010) Identification of genes induced in proteoid roots of white lupin under nitrogen and phosphorus deprivation, with functional characterization of a formamidase. Plant Soil 334:137–150
Ravichandran S, Stone SL, Benkel B (2015) Optimal level of purple acid phosphatase5 is required for maintaining complete resistance to Pseudomonas syringae. Front Plant Sci 6:1–10
Rawat P, Shankhdhar D, Shankhdhar SC (2020) Plant growth promoting potential and biocontrol efficiency of phosphate solubilizing bacteria in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci 9:2145–2152
Raya-González J, Pelagio-Flores R, López-Bucio J (2012) The jasmonate receptor COI1 plays a role in jasmonate-induced lateral root formation and lateral root positioning in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Plant Physiol 169:1348–1358
Rees RM, Bingham IJ, Baddeley JA, Watson CA (2005) The role of plants and land management in sequestering soil carbon in temperate arable and grassland ecosystems. Geoderma 128:130–154
Reyes I, Bernier L, Antoun H (2002) Rock phosphate solubilization and colonization of maize rhizosphere by wild and genetically modified strains of Penicillium rugulosum. Microb Ecol 44:39–48
Richardson AE (2001) Prospects for using soil microorganisms to improve the acquisition of phosphorus by plants. Func Plant Biol 28:897–906
Richardson AE, Lynch JP, Ryan PR, Delhaize E, Smith FA, Smith SE, Harvey PR, Ryan MH, Veneklaas EJ, Lambers H, Oberson A (2011) Plant and microbial strategies to improve the phosphorus efficiency of agriculture. Plant Soil 349:121–156
Robinson WD, Carson I, Ying S, Ellis K, Plaxton WC (2012) Eliminating the purple acid phosphatase AtPAP26 in Arabidopsis thaliana delays leaf senescence and impairs phosphorus remobilization. New Phytol 196:1024–1029
Rose TJ, Wissuwa M (2012) Rethinking internal phosphorus utilization efficiency: a new approach is needed to improve PUE in grain crops. Adv Agron 116:185–217
Ruzicka K, Ljung K, Vanneste S, Podhorská R, Beeckman T, Friml J, Benková E (2007) Ethylene regulates root growth through effects on auxin biosynthesis and transport-dependent auxin distribution. Plant Cell 19:2197–2212
Rychter AM, Chauveau M, Bomsel JL, Lance C (1992) The effect of phosphate deficiency on mitochondrial activity and adenylate levels in bean roots. Physiol Plant 84:80–86
Sabet MS, Zamani K, Lohrasebi T (2018) Functional assessment of an overexpressed arabidopsis purple acid phosphatase gene (AtPAP26) in tobacco plants. Iran J Biotechnol 16:31–41
Sahu S, Ajmal P, Bhangare R (2014) Natural radioactivity assessment of a phosphate fertilizer plant area. J Radiat Res Appl Sci J Radiat Res Appl Sc 7:123–128
Sattari SZ, Bouwman AF, Martinez Rodríguez R (2016) Negative global phosphorus budgets challenge sustainable intensification of grasslands. Nat Commun 7:1–12
Sawers RJ, Svane SF, Quan C, Grønlund M, Wozniak B, Gebreselassie MN, González-Muñoz E, Chávez Montes RA, Baxter I, Goudet J, Jakobsen I (2017) Phosphorus acquisition efficiency in arbuscular mycorrhizal maize is correlated with the abundance of root-external hyphae and the accumulation of transcripts encoding PHT1 phosphate transporters. New Phytol 214:632–643
Schachtman DP, Reid RJ, Ayling SM (1998) Phosphorus uptake by plants: from soil to cell. Plant Physiol 116:447–453
Schoumans OF, Bouraoui F, Kabbe C, Oenema O, Van Dijk KC (2015) Phosphorus management in Europe in a changing world. Ambio 44(2):180–192
Shen J, Yuan L, Zhang J (2011) Phosphorus dynamics: from soil to plant. Plant Physiol 156:997–1005
Sieger SM, Kristensen BK, Robson CA (2005) The role of alternative oxidase in modulating carbon use efficiency and growth during macronutrient stress in tobacco cells. J EXP Bot 56:1499–1515
Simpson RJ, Oberson A, Culvenor RA, Ryan MH, Veneklaas EJ, Lambers H, Lynch JP, Ryan PR, Delhaize E, Smith FA, Smith SE (2011) Strategies and agronomic interventions to improve the phosphorus-use efficiency of farming systems. Plant Soil 349:89–120
Singh B, Pandey R (2003) Differences in root exudation among phosphorus-starved genotypes of maize and green gram and its relationship with phosphorus uptake. J Plant Nutr 26:2391–2401
Singh NRR, Sarma SS, Rao TN, Pant H, Srikanth VVSS, Kumar R (2021) Cryo-milled nano-DAP for enhanced growth of monocot and dicot plants. Nanoscale Adv 3:4834–4842
Skene KR, James WM (2000) A comparison of the effects of auxin on cluster root initiation and development in Grevillea robusta Cunn. ex R. Br. (Proteaceae) and in the genus Lupinus (Leguminosae). Plant Soil 219:221–229
Song L, Yu H, Dong J, Che X, Jiao Y, Liu D (2016) The molecular mechanism of ethylene-mediated root hair development induced by phosphate starvation. PLoS Genet 12:e1006194
Sperber J (1958) The incidence of apatite-solubilizing organisms in the rhizosphere and soil. Aust J Agric Res 9:778–781
Srivastava R, Akash PAP (2020) Identification, structure analysis, and transcript profiling of purple acid phosphatases under Pi deficiency in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) and its wild relatives. Int J Biol Macromol 165:2253–2266
Srivastava R, Sirohi P, Chauhan H, Kumar R (2021) The enhanced phosphorus use efficiency in phosphate-deficient and mycorrhiza-inoculated barley seedlings involves activation of different sets of PHT1 transporters in roots. Planta 254:1–7
Subba Rao A, Srivastava S, Ganeshamurty AN (2015) Phosphorus supply may dictate food security prospects in India. Curr Sci 108:1253–1261
Sulieman S, Tran LS (2017) Legume nitrogen fixation in soils with low phosphorus availability: adaptation and regulatory implication. Springer International Publishing, switzerland
Sulpice R, Flis A, Ivakov AA, Apelt F, Krohn N, Encke B, Abel C, Feil R, Lunn JE, Stitt M (2014) Arabidopsis coordinates the diurnal regulation of carbon allocation and growth across a wide range of photoperiods. Mol Plant 7:137–155
Sun H, Tao J, Liu S, Huang S, Chen S, Xie X, Yoneyama K, Zhang Y, Xu G (2014) Strigolactones are involved in phosphate-and nitrate-deficiency-induced root development and auxin transport in rice. J Exp Bot 65:6735–6746
Sun T, Li M, Shao Y (2017) Comprehensive genomic identification and expression analysis of the phosphate transporter (PHT) gene family in apple. Front Plant Sci 8:426
Svistoonoff S, Creff A, Reymond M, Sigoillot-Claude C, Ricaud L, Blanchet A, Nussaume L, Desnos T (2007) Root tip contact with low-phosphate media reprograms plant root architecture. Nat Genet 39:792–796
Syers J, Johnston A, Bulletin DC (2008) Efficiency of soil and fertilizer phosphorus use. FAO Fertiliz Plant Nutrit Bull 18:108
Tang H, Li X, Zu C, Zhang F, Shen J (2013) Spatial distribution and expression of intracellular and extracellular acid phosphatases of cluster roots at different developmental stages in white lupin. J Plant Phys 170:1243–1250
Tawaraya K (2003) Arbuscular mycorrhizal dependency of different plant species and cultivars. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 49:655–668
Thao HT, Yamakawa T (2019) Phosphite (phosphorous acid): fungicide, fertilizer or bio-stimulator? Soil Sci Plant Nutr 2:228–234
Theodorou ME, Plaxton WC (1993) Metabolic adaptations of plant respiration to nutritional phosphate deprivation. Plant Physiol 101:339–344
Thirukkumaran CM, Parkinson D (2002) Microbial activity, nutrient dynamics and litter decomposition in a Canadian Rocky Mountain pine forest as affected by N and P fertilizers. For Ecol Manag 159:187–201
Tian J, Wang C, Zhang Q (2012) Overexpression of OsPAP10a, a root-associated acid phosphatase, increased extracellular organic phosphorus utilization in rice. J Integr Plant Biol 54:631–639
Tran HT, Hurley BA, Plaxton WC (2010) Feeding hungry plants: the role of purple acid phosphatases in phosphate nutrition. Plant Sci 179:14–27
Ullrich-Eberius CI, Novacky A, van Bel AJE (1984) Phosphate uptake in Lemna gibba G1: energetics and kinetics. Planta 161:46–52
Van de Wiel CCM, van der Linden CG, Scholten OE (2016) Improving phosphorus use efficiency in agriculture: opportunities for breeding. Euphytica 207:1–22
Van Geel M, De Beenhouwer M, Ceulemans T, Caes K, Ceustermans A, Bylemans D, Gomand A, Lievens B, Honnay O (2016) Application of slow-release phosphorus fertilizers increases arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal diversity in the roots of apple trees. Plant Soil 402:291–301
Vazquez P, Holguin G, Puente ME (2000) Phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms associated with the rhizosphere of mangroves in a semiarid coastal lagoon. Biol Fertil Soils 30:460–468
Veneklaas EJ, Lambers H, Bragg J (2012) Opportunities for improving phosphorus-use efficiency in crop plants. New Phytol 195:306–320
Von Uexküll HR, Mutert E (1995) Global extent, development and economic impact of acid soils. Plant Soil 171:1–15
Wang L, Nancollas GH (2008) Calcium orthophosphates: crystallization and dissolution. Chem Rev 108:4628–4669
Wang X, Wang Y, Tian J (2009) Overexpressing AtPAP15 enhances phosphorus efficiency in soybean. Plant Physiol 151:233–2450
Wang X, Yan X, Liao H (2010) Genetic improvement for phosphorus efficiency in soybean: a radical approach. Ann Bot 106:215–222
Wang L, Li Z, Qian W, Guo W, Gao X, Huang L, Wang H, Zhu H, Wu JW, Wang D, Liu D (2011) The Arabidopsis purple acid phosphatase AtPAP10 is predominantly associated with the root surface and plays an important role in plant tolerance to phosphate limitation. Plant Physiol 157:1283–1299
Wang L, Lu S, Zhang Y (2014) Comparative genetic analysis of Arabidopsis purple acid phosphatases AtPAP10, AtPAP12, and AtPAP26 provides new insights into their roles in plant adaptation to phosphate deprivation. J Integr Plant Biol 56:299–314
Wang C, Yue W, Ying Y, Wang S, Secco D, Liu Y, Whelan J, Tyerman SD, Shou H (2015) Rice SPX-Major Facility Superfamily3, a vacuolar phosphate efflux transporter, is involved in maintaining phosphate homeostasis in rice. Plant Physiol 169:2822–2831
Wang Y, Wang F, Lu H, Liu Y, Mao C (2021a) Phosphate uptake and transport in plants: an elaborate regulatory system. Plant Cell Physiol. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcab011
Wang Y, Chen YF, Wu WH (2021b) Potassium and phosphorus transport and signaling in plants. J Integr Plant Biol 63:34–52
Wen Z, Li H, Shen Q, Tang X, Xiong C, Li H, Pang J, Ryan MH, Lambers H, Shen J (2019) Tradeoffs among root morphology, exudation and mycorrhizal symbioses for phosphorus-acquisition strategies of 16 crop species. New Phytol 223:882–895
White PJ, Veneklaas EJ (2012) Nature and nurture: the importance of seed phosphorus content. Plant Soil 357:1–8
Williamson LC, Ribrioux SP, Fitter AH, Leyser HO (2001) Phosphate availability regulates root system architecture in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 126:875–882
Yan X, Liao H, Beebe SE, Blair MW, Lynch JP (2004) QTL mapping of root hair and acid exudation traits and their relationship to phosphorus uptake in common bean. Plant Soil 265:17–29
Yanni YG, Rizk RY, Abd El-Fattah FK, Squartini A, Corich V, Giacomini A, de Bruijn F, Rademaker J, Maya-Flores J, Ostrom P, Vega-Hernandez M (2001) The beneficial plant growth-promoting association of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. trifolii with rice roots. Funct Plant Biol 28:845–870
Zakhleniuk OV, Raines CA, Lloyd JC (2001) pho3: a phosphorus-deficient mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Planta 212:529–534
Zhang Y, Yu L, Yung KF (2012) Over-expression of AtPAP2 in Camelina sativa leads to faster plant growth and higher seed yield. Biotechnol Biofuels 5:1–10
Zhang Y, Sun F, Fettke J (2014a) Heterologous expression of AtPAP2 in transgenic potato influences carbon metabolism and tuber development. FEBS Lett 588:3726–3731
Zhang Z, Liao H, Lucas WJ (2014b) Molecular mechanisms underlying phosphate sensing, signaling, and adaptation in plants. J Integrat Plant Biol 56(192):220
Zhang JC, Wang XN, Sun W, Wang XF, Tong XS, Ji XL, An JP, Zhao Q, You CX, Hao YJ (2020) Phosphate regulates malate/citrate-mediated iron uptake and transport in apple. Plant Sci 297:110526
Zhu X, Lee SY, Yang WT (2019) The Burholderia pyrrocinia purple acid phosphatase Pap9 mediates phosphate acquisition in plants. J Plant Biol 62:342–350
Zoboli O, Laner D, Zessner M, Rechberger H (2016) Added values of time series in material flow analysis: the austrian phosphorus budget from 1990 to 2011. J Ind Ecol 20:1334–1348
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by grants received from the Science and Engineering Research Board, Govt. of India (CRG/2018/001033), and IoE, MHRD (RC1-20-018) and the Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India, Indo-Bulgaria Bilateral Research Cooperation (INT/BLG/P-06/2019). RK thanks the Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India, for Funds for Infrastructure in Science and Technology (FIST), Level II, and from the University Grants Commission under Special Assistance Programme (UGC-SAP-DRS-II) for improving the infrastructure in the Department of Plant Sciences, University of Hyderabad (UoH). RK also acknowledges the financial support to the University of Hyderabad-IoE by MHRD (F11/9/2019-U3(A)). RS thanks the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, Govt. of India, for the JRF and SRF fellowships and UoH BBL for research fellowship.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
RK conceived the idea. RK, RS, and SB wrote the original draft. All authors read the final draft and approved it.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Srivastava, R., Basu, S. & Kumar, R. Phosphorus starvation response dynamics and management in plants for sustainable agriculture. J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol. 30, 829–847 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13562-021-00715-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13562-021-00715-8