Abstract
This paper tests the idea of substituting the atmospheric observations with atmospheric reanalysis when setting up a coupled data assimilation system. The paper focuses on the quantification of the effects on the oceanic analysis resulted from this substitution and designs four different assimilation schemes for such a substitution. A coupled Lorenz96 system is constructed and an ensemble Kalman filter is adopted. The atmospheric reanalysis and oceanic observations are assimilated into the system and the analysis quality is compared to a benchmark experiment where both atmospheric and oceanic observations are assimilated. Four schemes are designed for assimilating the reanalysis and they differ in the generation of the perturbed observation ensemble and the representation of the error covariance matrix. The results show that when the reanalysis is assimilated directly as independent observations, the root-mean-square error increase of oceanic analysis relative to the benchmark is less than 16% in the perfect model framework; in the biased model case, the increase is less than 22%. This result is robust with sufficient ensemble size and reasonable atmospheric observation quality (e.g., frequency, noisiness, and density). If the observation is overly noisy, infrequent, sparse, or the ensemble size is insufficiently small, the analysis deterioration caused by the substitution is less severe since the analysis quality of the benchmark also deteriorates significantly due to worse observations and undersampling. The results from different assimilation schemes highlight the importance of two factors: accurate representation of the error covariance of the reanalysis and the temporal coherence along each ensemble member, which are crucial for the analysis quality of the substitution experiment.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anderson, J. L., 2001: An ensemble adjustment Kalman filter for data assimilation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 2884–2903, doi: 10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<2884: AEAKFF>2.0.CO;2.
Arakawa, O., and A. Kitoh, 2004: Comparison of local precipitation–SST relationship between the observation and a reanalysis dataset. Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L12206, doi: 10.1029/2004GL020283.
Burgers, G., P. J. van Leeuwen, and G. Evensen, 1998: Analysis scheme in the ensemble Kalman filter. Mon. Wea. Rev., 126, 1719–1724, doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1998)126<1719:ASITEK>2.0.CO;2.
Chen, D., S. E. Zebiak, A. J. Busalacchi, et al., 1995: An improved procedure for El Ni˜no forecasting: Implications for predictability. Science, 269, 1699–1702, doi: 10.1126/science.269.5231.1699.
Dee, D. P., S. M. Uppala, A. J. Simmons, et al., 2011: The ERA-Interim reanalysis: Configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 553–597, doi: 10.1002/qj.828.
Evensen, G., 1994: Sequential data assimilation with a nonlinear quasi-geostrophic model using Monte Carlo methods to forecast error statistics. J. Geophys. Res., 99, 10143–10162, doi: 10.1029/94JC00572.
Gaspari, G., and S. E. Cohn, 1999: Construction of correlation functions in two and three dimensions. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 125, 723–757, doi: 10.1002/qj.49712555417.
Gottwald, G. A., and A. J. Majda, 2013: A mechanism for catastrophic filter divergence in data assimilation for sparse observation networks. Nonlinear Process. Geophys., 20, 705–712, doi: 10.5194/npg-20-705-2013.
Hamill, T. M., J. S. Whitaker, and C. Snyder, 2001: Distance-dependent filtering of background error covariance estimates in an ensemble Kalman filter. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 2776–2790, doi: 10.1175/ 1520-0493(2001)129<2776:DDFOBE>2.0.CO;2.
Han, G. J., X. R. Wu, S. Q. Zhang, et al., 2013: Error covariance estimation for coupled data assimilation using a Lorenz atmosphere and a simple pycnocline ocean model. J. Climate, 26, 10218–10231, doi: 10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00236.1.
Houtekamer, P. L., and H. L. Mitchell, 1998: Data assimilation using an ensemble Kalman filter technique. Mon. Wea. Rev., 126, 796–811.
Iseries, A., 1996: A First Course in the Numerical Analysis of Differential Equations. Cambridge University Press, 447 pp.
Kalnay, E., M. Kanamitsu, R. Kistler, et al., 1996: The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 77, 437–472. doi: 10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077<0437:TNYRP>2.0.CO;2.
Kanamitsu, M., W. Ebisuzaki, J. Woollen, et al., 2002: NCEP-DOE AMIP-II reanalysis (R-2). Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 83, 1631–1643, doi: 10.1175/BAMS-83-11-1631.
Kistler, R., W. Collins, S. Saha, et al., 2001: The NCEPNCAR 50-year reanalysis: Monthly means CD-ROM and documentation. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 82, 247–267, doi: 10.1175/1520-0477(2001)082<0247: TNNYRM>2.3.CO;2.
Kitoh, A., and O. Arakawa, 1999: On overestimation of tropical precipitation by an atmospheric GCM with prescribed SST. Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 2965–2968, doi: 10.1029/1999GL900616.
Kobayashi, S., Y. Ota, Y. Harada, et al., 2015: The JRA-55 reanalysis: General specifications and basic characteristics. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 93, 5–48, doi: 10.2151/jmsj.2015-001.
Liu Zhengyu, Wu Shu, Zhang Shaoqing, et al., 2013: Ensemble data assimilation in a simple coupled climate model: The role of ocean–atmosphere interaction. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 30, 1235–1248, doi: 10.1007/s00376-013-2268-z.
Lorenz, E. N., 1996: Predictability—A problem partly solved. Proceedings of Seminar on Predictability, 1, ECMWF, Reading, Berkshire, UK, 1–18.
Lu, F. Y., Z. Y. Liu, S. Q. Zhang, et al., 2015: Strongly coupled data assimilation using leading averaged coupled covariance (LACC). Part II: CGCM experiments. Mon. Wea. Rev., 143, 4645–4659.
Luo, J.-J., S. Masson, S. K. Behera, et al., 2008: Extended ENSO predictions using a fully coupled ocean–atmosphere model. J. Climate, 21, 84–93, doi: 10.1175/2007JCLI1412.1.
Saha, S., S. Moorthi, H. L. Pan, et al., 2010: The NCEP climate forecast system reanalysis. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 91, 1015–1057, doi: 10.1175/2010BAMS3001.1.
Sugiura, N., T. Awaji, S. Masuda, et al., 2008: Development of a four-dimensional variational coupled data assimilation system for enhanced analysis and prediction of seasonal to interannual climate variations. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean., 113(C10), C10017, doi:10. 1029/2008JC004741.
Tardif, R., G. J. Hakim, and C. Snyder, 2015: Coupled atmosphere–ocean data assimilation experiments with a low-order model and CMIP5 model data. Climate Dyn., 45, 1415–1427, doi: 10.1007/s00382-014-2390-3.
Uppala, S. M., P. W. Kållberg, A. J. Simmons, et al., 2005: The ERA-40 reanalysis. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131, 2961–3012, doi: 10.1256/qj.04.176.
Zhang, S., 2011: A study of impacts of coupled model initial shocks and state–parameter optimization on climate predictions using a simple pycnocline prediction model. J. Climate, 24, 6210–6226, doi: 10.1175/JCLI-D-10-05003.1.
Zhang, F., C. Snyder, and J. Z. Sun, 2004: Impacts of initial estimate and observation availability on convective-scale data assimilation with an ensemble Kalman filter. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 1238–1253, doi: 10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<1238:IOIEAO>2.0.CO;2.
Zhang, S., M. J. Harrison, A. T. Wittenberg, et al., 2005: Initialization of an ENSO forecast system using a parallelized ensemble filter. Mon. Wea. Rev., 133, 3176–3201, doi: 10.1175/MWR3024.1.
Zhang, S., M. J. Harrison, A. Rosati, et al., 2007: System design and evaluation of coupled ensemble data assimilation for global oceanic climate studies. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135, 3541–3564, doi:10.1175/MWR3466.1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Supported by the National (Key) Basic Research and Development (973) Program of China (2012CB417201) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (41375053).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, H., Lu, F., Liu, Z. et al. Assimilating atmosphere reanalysis in coupled data assimilation. J Meteorol Res 30, 572–583 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-016-6014-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-016-6014-1