Abstract
Spatial heterogeneity poses a major challenge for the appropriate interpretation of eddy covariance data. The quantification of footprint climatology is fundamental to improving our understanding of carbon budgets, assessing the quality of eddy covariance data, and upscaling the representativeness of a tower flux to regional or global scales. In this study, we elucidated the seasonal variation of flux footprint climatologies and the major factors that influence them using the analytical FSAM (Flux Source Area Model), KM (Kormann and Meixner, 2001), and H (Hsieh et al., 2000) models based on eddy covariance measurements at two and three times the canopy height at the Qianyanzhou site of ChinaFLUX in 2003. The differences in footprints among the three models resulted from different underlying theories used to construct the models. A comparison demonstrated that atmospheric stability was the main factor leading to differences among the three models. In neutral and stable conditions, the KM and FSAM values agreed with each other, but they were both lower than the H values. In unstable conditions, the agreement among the three models for rough surfaces was better than that for smooth surfaces, and the models showed greater agreement for a low measurement height than for a high measurement height. The seasonal flux footprint climatologies were asymmetrically distributed around the tower and corresponded well to the prevailing wind direction, which was north-northwest in winter and south-southeast in summer. The average sizes of the 90% flux footprint climatologies were 0.36–0.74 and 1.5–3.2 km2 at altitudes of two and three times the canopy height, respectively. The average sizes were ranked by season as follows: spring > summer > winter > autumn. The footprint climatology depended more on atmospheric stability on daily scale than on seasonal scale, and it increased with the increasing standard deviation of the lateral wind fluctuations.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Allen, R. G., L. S. Pereira, T. A. Howell, et al., 2011: Evapotranspiration information reporting. I: Factors governing measurement accuracy. Agr. Water Manage., 98, 899–920.
Amiro, B. D., 1998: Footprint climatologies for evapotranspiration in a boreal catchment. Agr. Forest. Meteor., 90, 195–201.
Aubinet, M., T. Vesala, and D. Papale, 2012: Eddy Covariance: A Practical Guide to Measurement and Data Analysis. Springer, New York, 21–58 pp.
Baldocchi, D. D., 2008: “Breathing” of the terrestrial biosphere: Lessons learned from a global network of carbon dioxide flux measurement systems. Aust. J. Bot., 56, 1–26.
Biermann, T., W. Babel, E. Thiem, et al., 2011: Energy fluxes above Nam Co Lake and the surrounding grassland—The NamCo 2009 experiment. 7th Sino-German Workshop on Tibetan Plateau Research, Hamburg, Germany, 3–6 March, German TiP project and Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research.
Cai, X. H., J. Y. Chen, and R. L. Desjardins, 2010: Flux footprints in the convective boundary layer: Large-eddy simulation and lagrangian stochastic modelling. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 137, 31–47.
Cai, X. H., M. J. Zhu, S. M. Liu, et al., 2011: Flux footprint analysis and application for the large aperture scintillometer. Adv. Earth. Sci., 25, 1166–1174.
Chen, B., Q. Ge, D. Fu, et al., 2010: A data-model fusion approach for upscaling gross ecosystem productivity to the landscape scale based on remote sensing and flux footprint modelling. Biogeosciences, 7, 2943–2958.
Chen, B. Z., J. M. Chen, G. Mo, et al., 2008: Comparison of regional carbon flux estimates from CO2 concentration measurements and remote sensing based footprint integration. Global Biogeochem. Cycle, 22, doi: 10.1029/2007GB003024.
Chen, B. Z., N. C. Coops, D. J. Fu, et al., 2011: Assessing eddy-covariance flux tower location bias across the fluxnet–Canada research network based on remote sensing and footprint modelling. Agr. Forest Meteor., 151, 87–100.
Chen, B. Z., N. C. Coops, D. J. Fu, et al., 2012: Characterizing spatial representativeness of flux tower eddy-covariance measurements across the Canadian carbon program network using remote sensing and footprint analysis. Remote Sens. Environ., 124, 742–755.
Chen, B. Z., T. A. Black, N. C. Coops, et al., 2009: Assessing tower flux footprint climatology and scaling between remotely sensed and eddy covariance measurements. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 130, 137–167.
Foken, T., 2008: Micrometeorology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 82–87.
Gash, J. H. C., 1986: A note on estimating the effect of a limited fetch on micrometeorological evaporation measurements. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 35, 409–413.
Göckede, M., T. Markkanen, C. B. Hasager, et al., 2006: Update of a footprint-based approach for the characterisation of complex measurement sites. Bound. -Layer Meteor., 118, 635–655.
Göckede, M., T. Foken, M. Aubinet, et al., 2008: Quality control of CarboEurope flux data. Part 1: Coupling footprint analyses with flux data quality assessment to evaluate sites in forest ecosystems. Biogeosciences, 5, 433–450.
Horst, T. W., and J. C. Weil, 1992: Footprint estimation for scalar flux measurements in the atmospheric surface layer. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 59, 279–296.
Hsieh, C. I., G. Katul, and T. W. Chi, 2000: An approximate analytical model for footprint estimation of scalar fluxes in thermally stratified atmospheric flows. Adv. Water Resour., 23, 765–772.
Kljun, N., 2010: Attributing tall tower flux data to heterogeneous vegetation. 19th Symposium on Boundary Layers and Turbulence, Keystone, Colorado, 2–6 August, Amer. Meteor. Soc.
Kljun, N., 2010: BERMS sites revisited: Footprint climatology and 3D-LiDAR data. 29th Conference on Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Keystone, Colorado, 2–6 August, Amer. Meteor. Soc.
Kormann, R., and F. X. Meixner, 2001: An analytical footprint model for non-neutral stratification. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 99, 207–224.
Leclerc, M. Y., and G. W. Thurtell, 1990: Footprint prediction of scalar fluxes using a Markovian analysis. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 52, 247–258.
Leclerc, M. Y., and T. Foken, 2014: Footprints in Micrometeorology and Ecology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 71–98.
Leuning, R., 2005: Measurements of trace gas fluxes in the atmosphere using eddy covariance: WPL corrections revisited. Handbook of Micrometeorology: A Guide for Surface Flux Measurement and Analysis. Springer, Netherlands, 119–132.
Rebmann, C., M. Gockede, T. Foken, et al., 2005: Quality analysis applied on eddy covariance measurements at complex forest sites using footprint modeling. Theor. Appl. Climatol., 80, 121–141.
Schmid, H. P., 1994: Source areas for scalars and scalar fluxes. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 67, 293–318.
Schmid, H. P., 2002: Footprint modeling for vegetation atmosphere exchange studies: A review and perspective. Agr. Forest Meteor., 113, 159–183.
Sogachev, A., and J. Lloyd, 2004: Using a one-and-a-half order closure model of the atmospheric boundary layer for surface flux footprint estimation. Bound. -Layer Meteor., 112, 467–502.
Tang, Y. K., X. F. Wen, X. M. Sun, et al., 2014: The limiting effect of deep soilwater on evapotranspiration of a subtropical coniferous plantation subjected to seasonal drought. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 31, 385–395.
Tang, Y. K., X. F. Wen, X. M. Sun, et al., 2014: Interannual variation of the bowen ratio in a subtropical coniferous plantation in Southeast China, 2003–2012. Plos One, 9, e88267, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088267.
Vesala, T., N. Kljun, Ü. Rannik, et al., 2008: Flux and concentration footprint modeling: State of the art. Environ. Pollut., 152, 653–666.
Webb, E. K., G. I. Pearman, and R. Leuning, 1980: Correction of flux measurements for density effects due to heat and water vapour transfer. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 106, 85–100.
Wen, X. F., G. R. Yu, X. M. Sun, et al., 2006: Soil moisture effect on the temperature dependence of ecosystem respiration in a subtropical Pinus plantation of southeastern China. Agr. Forest Meteor., 137, 166–175.
Wen, X. F., H. M. Wang, J. L. Wang, et al., 2010: Ecosystem carbon exchanges of a subtropical evergreen coniferous plantation subjected to seasonal drought, 2003–2007. Biogeosciences, 7, 357–369.
Wilczak, J. M., S. P. Oncley, and S. A. Stage, 2001: Sonic anemometer tilt correction algorithms. Bound. -Layer Meteor., 99, 127–150.
Yu Guirui, Wen Xuefa, and Sun Xiaomin, et al., 2006: Overview of ChinaFLUX and evaluation of its eddy covariance measurement. Agr. Forest Meteor., 137, 125–137.
Zhang Hui, Shen Shuanghe, Wen Xuefa, et al., 2012: Flux footprint of carbon dioxide and vapor exchange over the terrestrial ecosystem: A review. Acta Ecol. Sin., 32, 7622–7633. (in Chinese)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Supported by the National Basic Research and Development (973) Program of China (2012CB416903), National Natural Science Foundation of China (31470500 and 31290221), and Knowledge Innovation Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (KZCX2-EW-QN305).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, H., Wen, X. Flux footprint climatology estimated by three analytical models over a subtropical coniferous plantation in Southeast China. J Meteorol Res 29, 654–666 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-014-4090-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-014-4090-7