Abstract
Suction caissons can readily penetrate into the seabed under the combination of the self-weight and suction resulted from the encased water being increasingly pumped out. During suction-assisted penetration, the equivalent overburden at the skirt-tip level outside the caisson is generally higher than that inside because the vertical stress within the soil plug is reduced by the exerted suction. This may result in a uniform shear stress developing over the base of the skirt-tip as the soil below the skirt-tip tends to move into the caisson, which leads to an asymmetric failure wedge existing below the base of the skirt-tip. Besides, different adhesion factors along the inside (α1) and outside (αo) of the skirt wall will cause asymmetric plastic zones inside and outside the caisson. Accordingly, an asymmetric failure mechanism is therefore proposed to calculate the penetration resistance of the skirt-tip. The proposed failure mechanism is the first to consider the effect of different adhesion factors (αi) and (αo) on the failure mechanism at the skirt-tip, and involves the contribution from the weighted average of equivalent overburdens inside and outside caisson at the skirt-tip level. The required suction pressure can be obtained in terms of force equilibrium of the caisson in a vertical direction. Finally, the asymmetric failure mechanism at the skirt-tip is validated with the FE calculations. By comparing with the measured data, the predictions of the required suction pressure are found to be in good agreement with the experimental results.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Andersen, K.H. and Jostad, H.P., 1999. Foundation design of skirted foundations and anchors in clay, Proceedings of the 31st Annual Offshore Technology Conference, OTC, Houston, TX, pp. 383–392.
Andersen, K.H., Jostad, H.P. and Dyvik, R., 2008. Penetration resistance of offshore skirted foundations and anchors in dense sand, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 134(1), 106–116.
Andersen, K.H., Murff, J.D., Randolph, M.F., Clukey, E.C., Erbirch, C.T., Jostad, H.P., Hansen, B., Aubeny, C., Sharma, P. and Supachawarote, C., 2005. Suction anchors for deepwater applications, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics (ISFOG), Perth, Western Australia, pp. 3–30.
Byrne, W.B., Houlsby, G.T., Martin, C. and Fish, P., 2002. Suction caisson foundations for offshore wind turbines, Wind Engineering, 26(3), 145–155.
Chen, W. and Randolph, M., 2004. Radial stress changes around caissons installed in clay by jacking and by suction, Proceedings of the 14th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers, Toulon, France, pp., 493–499.
Davis, E.H. and Booker J.R., 1973. The effect of increasing strength with depth on the bearing capacity of clays, Géotechnique, 23(4), 551–563.
Guo, Z., Wang, L.Z., Yuan, F. and Li, L.L., 2012. Model tests on installation techniques of suction caissons in a soft clay seabed, Applied Ocean Research, 34, 116–125.
Hossain, M.S., Lehane, B.M., Hu, Y. and Gao, Y., 2012. Soil flow mechanisms around and between stiffeners of caissons during installation in clay, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 49(4), 442–459.
Houlsby, G.T. and Byrne, B.W., 2005. Design procedures for installation of suction caissons in clay and other materials, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Geotechnical Engineering, 158(2), 75–82.
Houlsby, G.T., Kelly, R.B., Huxtable, J. and Byrne, B.W., 2005. Field trials of suction caissons in clay for offshore wind turbine foundations, Géotechnique, 55(4), 287–296.
House, A.R., Randolph, M.F. and Borbas, M.E., 1999. Limiting aspect ratio for suction caisson installation in clay, Proceedings of the 9th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers, Brest, France, pp. 676–683.
House, A.R. and Randolph, M.F., 2001. Installation and pull-out capacity of stiffened suction caissons in cohesive sediments, Proceedings 11th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers, Stavanger, Norway, pp. 574–580.
Li, D.Y., Guo, Y.X. and Gao, Y.F., 2013. Principle and application of pole point method of Mohr’s circle, Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 35(10), 1883–1888. (in Chinese)
Li, L.L., Dai, H.J. and Wang, L.Z., 2010. Behavior of installation for suction anchor in soft clay, Proceedings of the ASME 2010 29th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, ASME, Shanghai, China, pp. 823–829.
Luan, L.B., Ding, X.M., Zheng, C.J., Kouretzis, G. and Wu, Q., 2020. Dynamic response of pile groups subjected to horizontal loads, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 57(4), 469–481.
Meyerhof, G.G., 1951. The ultimate bearing capacity of foundations, Géotechnique, 2(4), 301–332.
Meyerhof, G.G., 1955. Influence of roughness of base and ground-water conditions on the ultimate bearing capacity of foundations, Géotechnique, 5(3), 227–242.
Meyerhof, G.G., 1963. Some recent research on the bearing capacity of foundations, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1(1), 16–26.
Randolph, M., Cassidy, M., Gourvenec, S. and Erbrich, C., 2005. Challenges of offshore geotechnical engineering, Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, vol. 1, Osaka, Japan, pp., 123–176.
Randolph, M.F. and House, A.R., 2002. Analysis of suction caisson capacity in clay, Proceedings of the Offshore Technology Conference, OTC, Houston, Texas, pp. 2145–2155.
Randolph, M.F., O’Neill, M.P., Stewart, D.P. and Erbrich, C., 1998. Performance of suction anchors in fine-grained calcareous soils, Proceedings of the Offshore Technology Conference, OTC, Houston, Texas pp. 521–529.
Terzaghi, K., 1943. Theoretical Soil Mechanics, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Watson, P.G., Randolph, M.F. and Bransby, M.F., 2000. Combined lateral and vertical loading of caisson foundations, Proceedings of the Offshore Technology Conference, OTC, Houston, Texas, pp. 797–808.
Westgate, Z.J., Tapper, L., Lehane, B.M. and Gaudin, C., 2009. Modelling the installation of stiffened caissons in overconsolidated clay, Proceedings of the ASME 2009 28th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, ASME, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, pp. 119–126.
Wu, Y.Q., Li, D.Y., Zhang, Y.K. and Chen, F.Q., 2018. Determination of maximum penetration depth of suction caissons in sand, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 22(8), 2776–2783.
Wu, Y.Q., Wang, Z.T., Yang, Q. and Li, D.Y., 2019. Theoretical studies on penetration resistance of suction caissons in clay, Marine Georesources and Geotechnology, 37(5), 558–567.
Wu, Y.Q., Zhang, Y. and Li, D.Y., 2020. Solution to critical suction pressure of penetrating suction caissons into clay using limit analysis, Applied Ocean Research, 101, 102264.
Zhang, P.Y., Guo, Y.H., Liu, Y.G. and Ding, H.Y., 2016. Experimental study on installation of hybrid bucket foundations for offshore wind turbines in silty clay, Ocean Engineering, 114, 87–100.
Zhou, H.J. and Randolph, M.F., 2006. Large deformation analysis of suction caisson installation in clay, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 43(12), 1344–1357.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Foundation item
This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51639002 and 51879044) and the SDUST Research Fund (Grant No. 2015KYJH104).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, Yq., Li, Dy. & Yang, Q. Penetration Resistance of Skirt-Tip with Rough Base for Suction Caissons in Clay. China Ocean Eng 34, 784–794 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13344-020-0071-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13344-020-0071-z