Abstract
Astrocytoma constitutes the most noted malignancies of the central nervous system with worse clinical outcomes in grade IV astrocytoma or glioblastoma multiforme. Owing to poor clinical outcomes with existing therapeutic regime, there is a need to revisit the initial course of treatment. Statistical information of clinicopathological parameters could be used to understand the spread of disease and, in turn, to formulate updated treatment management. In the present study, we have seen anatomic distribution of astrocytoma subtypes in a group of 479 patients and correlated it with survival outcomes. Anatomic location was confirmed by MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) images. A registry of patients was maintained with clinicopathological details as tumor type, location, age/sex, and survival after surgery. We have observed overall survival particulars in patients diagnosed with astrocytoma. Our findings highlight that in total cases, tumor location was anatomically dominated by frontal and temporal lobes. Survival analysis in high-grade (grade III, p = 0.03; grade IV, p = 0.01) astrocytic tumors confirms poor outcomes with temporal, parietal, and occipital location as compared to frontal lobe. Overall survival study demonstrates glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) was associated with worse prognosis as compared to astrocytoma subtypes (p < 0.0001). In high-grade astrocytomas, anaplastic astrocytoma was found with 34 months of median survival age while 14 months in the case of patients with glioblastoma multiforme. In conclusion, we report dismal prognosis in parietal, temporal, and occipital lobes in grade II, grade III, and grade IV astrocytoma patients. Among astrocytoma subtypes, patients with glioblastoma multiforme were associated with worse survival outcomes. We uniquely feature the survival of astrocytoma patients for the first time and observe GBM patients have slightly longer survival.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Astrocytomas are the most common malignancies of the brain. The World Health Organization (WHO) has classified astrocytoma in four grades on account of cellularity, nuclear polymorphism, mitotic index, microvascular proliferation, and extent of necrosis [1]. Grade IV astrocytomas, also referred as glioblastoma multiforme, are the most aggressive primary tumors with worst prognosis and account for nearly 60% of malignant gliomas [1,2,3,4]. The overall prognosis for malignant glial tumors have not changed significantly since 1980 despite of advancements in course of diagnosis and mode of treatment [5]. Understanding of prognostic factors affecting survival and clinicopathological statistics can help to evaluate new measures for therapeutic intervention [6]. In previous tertiary study, we observed lower median age and assessed symptoms associated with pathologic progression of astrocytoma patients [7]. Molecular markers such as PTEN, TP53, loss of heterozygosity on chromosome 10q, and EGFR amplification have also been ascertained with poor prognosis [8, 9].
Anatomic origin of tumor is reported to have prognostic importance. Tumors with anatomic origin on the frontal lobe are reported to have enhanced prognosis value than temporal, parietal, or occipital lobe. Preferred anatomy of low-grade astrocytoma in certain areas is explained by functional, developmental, or metabolic aspects. Type of surgery and location are reported as independent factors contributing to prognosis of glioblastoma multiforme. Patients with tumor origin at the frontal lobe have been shown to have progression-free survival for 1 year than other locations [10,11,12,13,14]. Relative volume of glial tissue has been shown to influence development of gliomas in different anatomic sites. Functional differences between tissues in the brain have been postulated for certain preferred locations of tumors [15]. Distinct molecular alterations prevalent in subset of glial tumors arising from different anatomic origins have been reported [16,17,18]. However, there are very few reports evidencing the role of anatomic locations influencing the prognosis.
The aim of the present study was to screen clinical data on account of anatomic origin of tumor, to investigate the survival pattern reflected by tumor anatomy, and to analyze the overall survival among four grades of astrocytic tumors.
Materials and Methods
Selection of Patients
The cases were reported at Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences (KIMS), Secunderabad, India, during the time span of January 2009 to December 2014. Patients were approached after surgical resection. Each patient was assigned with unique ID. Informed consent was obtained from patients and each one was completely anonymized. Pathological distribution of tumor grade was determined by biopsy of surgically resected tissue specimen at pathology department on account of cellularity, nuclear polymorphisms, and MIB-1 staining. The pathology details were confirmed by two independent observations. Registry of patients was maintained with age/sex, grade of tumor, and follow-up details. All patients were Indian citizen.
Anatomic location of tumor was assigned roughly in four lobes on the basis of radiological reports: frontal, parietal, temporal, and occipital (Fig. 1). The treatment for low-grade tumors was dependent on few factors such as age of patients and location of tumors. Treatment (surgical resection, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or palliative treatment) was designed such that the benefit over fits the possible post-treatment complications. The most common surgical resection procedure was craniotomy; in the case of tumor in the occipital lobe, suboccipital craniotomy was followed. For treating the high-grade tumors, the surgical resection was most commonly followed by chemo and/or radiotherapy. Temozolomide was the most commonly used drug in these patients. MRI scan was practiced every 3 months to trace possible recurrence (Fig. 1).
In tumors with involvement of two lobes (e.g., frontotemporal, predominantly located at the frontal lobe), overlap was ignored and tumor location was designated at one location. In the case with overlap in several areas of the brain, position was designated as per deeper anatomic site. Anterior location was given in the same way with overlapping cases.
In total, our registry reported 42 pilocytic astrocytoma cases, 181 diffuse astrocytoma cases, 78 anaplastic astrocytoma cases, and 178 glioblastoma multiforme cases. Survival information was not available with total of 94 cases (grade I = 9, grade II = 50, grade III = 10, grade IV = 25).
Statistical Analysis
Survival details were studied using Kaplan-Meier statistics to evaluate overall survival in pilocytic astrocytoma, diffuse astrocytoma, anaplastic astrocytoma, and glioblastoma multiforme. Differences between survival in groups were evaluated using logrank (Mantel-Cox) test. p value less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Results
Of all cases studied, 8.7% were of pilocytic astrocytoma, 37.7% diffuse astrocytoma, 16.2% anaplastic astrocytoma, and 37.1% cases contributed glioblastoma multiforme. Previously, we reported 15.5 years as median age of diagnosis for pilocytic astrocytoma, 54 years for diffuse astrocytoma, 45 years for anaplastic astrocytoma, and 37.5 years for glioblastoma multiforme in our tertiary experience. We also have reported nearly 60% of male (for grade I astrocytoma, male = 33, female = 18; grade II astrocytoma, male = 124, female = 107; grade III astrocytoma, male = 51, female = 37; and for glioblastoma multiforme, male = 125, female = 78) in our group [7].
In all astrocytoma cases we sorted, 163 were located in the frontal lobe, 57 in the parietal lobe, 191 in the temporal lobe, and 68 in the occipital lobe (Table 1). In pilocytic astrocytoma cases, 3 were found to be located at the frontal lobe, 1 at the parietal lobe, 16 at the temporal lobe, and 22 at the occipital lobe. In diffuse astrocytoma cases, 74 were found to be located at the frontal lobe, 18 at the parietal lobe, 74 at the temporal lobe, and 15 at the occipital lobe. In anaplastic astrocytic tumors, 32 were found to be located at the frontal lobe, 10 at the parietal lobe, 27 at the temporal lobe, and 9 at the occipital lobe. In glioblastoma multiforme cases, 54 were found to be located at the frontal lobe, 28 at the parietal lobe, 74 at the temporal lobe, and 22 at the occipital lobe (Table 1).
We studied survival statistics for each grade of tumor as a function of anatomic location (Fig. 1). We observe variation in survival of patients on account of anatomic origin of tumor. Difference in anatomic location of tumor survival in grade II (Fig. 3), grade III (Fig. 4), and grade IV (Fig. 5) was statistically significant. Here, survival in patients with tumor in the frontal lobe was found to be better than in the occipital or temporal lobes. However, the anatomic details were found to be not significant in the case of grade I astrocytic tumors (Fig. 2). The median survival for pilocytic astrocytoma cases was undefined for the maximum follow-up time. For diffuse astrocytoma, it was reported to be 59 months; for anaplastic astrocytoma, it was 34 months; while for glioblastoma multiforme cases, the median survival of 14 months was noted. We have also analyzed survival of patients in four astrocytoma subtypes (Fig. 6). Survival in patients with glioblastoma multiforme was worse than other astrocytoma subtypes (median survival = 12 months, mean survival = 11 months) and is found to be statistically significant (p < 0.0001).
Discussion
The aim of the present study was to clinically screen astrocytoma subtypes by their respective anatomic origin in the brain and to study whether selective anatomic origin confers particular survival benefits.
We studied the anatomic location in astrocytomas and found dominated occurrence at the frontal and temporal lobes. Overall, we found tumor anatomic origin at the frontal lobe in 34% of cases, parietal lobe in 11.8% of cases, temporal lobe in 39.8% of cases, and occipital lobe in 14.1% of cases (Table 1, p = 0.007), while previous reports claim the frontal lobe as the anatomic origin for 43% gliomas, parietal lobe for 25% of cases, temporal lobe for 28% of cases, and occipital lobe for only 3% of cases [13]. Prominent origin at the frontal and temporal lobes found in our findings is consistent with existing literature [15]. Studies have shown that tumor occurs with more frequent involvement of the right hemisphere in the brain [19]. These reports, however, do not comment on prognostic significance of anatomic origin. We show for the first time that tumors with the frontal lobe as the anatomic origin have better prognostic significance than in the temporal, parietal, and occipital lobes. In grade II (Fig. 3) (p = 0.04) and grade III (Fig. 4) (p = 0.03) astrocytoma, better survival at the frontal lobe was statistically significant as compared to the parietal and temporal lobes. In glioblastoma multiforme, the temporal, parietal, and occipital lobe as anatomic origin was correlated with poor survival outcomes than the frontal lobe (Fig. 5) (p < 0.001). A recent study has shown that tumors located in the right hemisphere are correlated with worst prognosis [20]. Further, it was observed that tumors in this region have larger volume leading to extensive infiltration and tend to be difficult to resect [20, 21]. Previously, tumors located at the subventricular zone (adjacent to right parietal location) are correlated with worse prognosis. These investigations were based on qualitative assessment of tumor location [22, 23]. The association of poor prognosis at the parietal, temporal, and occipital lobes may be related to the underlying tumor biology and neuroanatomy at those particular locations. Along with it, further investigations are necessary to understand the molecular mutations associated with particular locations to know more about origin of tumors and associated pathology. Overall, our findings highlight frontal lobe was associated with significantly better prognostic values in anaplastic astrocytoma and in glioblastoma multiforme.
We have further studied retrospectively pattern of survival in patients with astrocytoma. We found that median age of survival (in months) was 59 for diffuse astrocytoma, 34 for anaplastic astrocytoma, and 14 for glioblastoma multiforme. For pilocytic astrocytoma, the median survival was undefined (Fig. 6).
Cancer registry system in developed countries and a developing nation like India differs mainly on ground of uniform collection and reporting of clinicopathological data. The dedicated cancer registry there helps to estimate accurate information about statistical distribution and mortality rate in a population [24]. While in India, epidemiological and clinicopathological study is reported as tertiary experiences [7]. Our study has several advantages; it is for the first time in India we are reporting survival information in a group. Second, we report our data with wide participation of patients and represent a dataset with significant coverage.
In conclusion, our findings indicate the frontal and temporal lobes as prominent anatomic origins of tumors. The frontal lobe as anatomic origin was correlated with better prognosis while the temporal, parietal, and occipital origins were significantly associated with worse clinical outcomes in high-grade astrocytoma patients. Among astrocytoma subtypes, glioblastoma multiforme was found with worse survival outcomes with median survival of 14 months, which was slightly higher as compared with existing literature. Further, there was no surgical mortality reported in the cases we observe.
The unique features of our study are (1) the patients were from all parts of India, (2) we note the median survival ages in considerably large cases in India and report the median survival among the four grades of astrocytoma, (3) we found glioblastoma patients to have slightly longer lifespan as compare with the existing literature, and (4) in the cases where the tumor is located on the frontal lobe, the most common surgical procedure followed was complete resection, which may have resulted in favored prognosis.
References
Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK, Burger PC, Jouvet A, Scheithauer BW, Kleihues P (2007) The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol 114(2):97–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-007-0243-4
Dolecek TA, Propp JM, Stroup NE, Kruchko C (2012) CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2005-2009. Neuro-Oncology 14(Suppl 5):v1–v49. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nos218
Baldi I, Gruber A, Alioum A, Berteaud E, Lebailly P, Huchet A, Tourdias T, Kantor G, Maire JP, Vital A, Loiseau H, and the Gironde TSNC Registry Group, Champeaux K, Dhauteribes M, Eimer S, Gimbert E, Liguoro D, Monteil P, Penchet G, San-Galli F, Vignes J (2011) Descriptive epidemiology of CNS tumors in France: results from the Gironde Registry for the period 2000-2007. Neuro-Oncology 13(12):1370–1378. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nor120
van den Bent MJ, Bromberg JE (2015) Neuro-oncology: the many challenges of treating elderly glioblastoma patients. Nat Rev Neurol 11(7):374–375. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2015.82
Walid MS (2008) Prognostic factors for long-term survival after glioblastoma. Perm J 12(4):45–48
Lamborn KR, Chang SM, Prados MD (2004) Prognostic factors for survival of patients with glioblastoma: recursive partitioning analysis. Neuro-Oncology 6(3):227–235
Deshpande RP, Babu D, Panigrahi M, Chandra Sekhar YB, Prakash Babu P (2016) Brain tumors incidences and a retrospective clinical analysis from a tertiary hospital in India. J Neuro-Oncol 129(2):383–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-016-2183-0
Homma T, Fukushima T, Vaccarella S, Yonekawa Y, Di Patre PL, Franceschi S et al (2006) Correlation among pathology, genotype, and patient outcomes in glioblastoma. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 65(9):846–854
Kraus JA, Glesmann N, Beck M, Krex D, Klockgether T, Schackert G, Schlegel U (2000) Molecular analysis of the PTEN, TP53 and CDKN2A tumor suppressor genes in long-term survivors of glioblastoma multiforme. J Neuro-Oncol 48(2):89–94
Wrensch M, Minn Y, Chew T, Bondy M, Berger MS (2002) Epidemiology of primary brain tumors: current concepts and review of the literature. Neuro-Oncology 4(4):278–299
Peters O, Gnekow AK, Rating D, Wolff JE (2004) Impact of location on outcome in children with low-grade oligodendroglioma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 43(3):250–256. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.20111
Jeremic B, Grujicic D, Antunovic V, Djuric L, Stojanovic M, Shibamoto Y (1994) Influence of extent of surgery and tumor location on treatment outcome of patients with glioblastoma multiforme treated with combined modality approach. J Neuro-Oncol 21(2):177–185
Simpson JR, Horton J, Scott C, Curran WJ, Rubin P, Fischbach J, Isaacson S, Rotman M, Asbell SO, Nelson JS, Weinstein AS, Nelson DF (1993) Influence of location and extent of surgical resection on survival of patients with glioblastoma multiforme: results of three consecutive Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) clinical trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 26(2):239–244
Duffau H, Capelle L (2004) Preferential brain locations of low-grade gliomas. Cancer 100(12):2622–2626. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20297
Larjavaara S, Mantyla R, Salminen T, Haapasalo H, Raitanen J, Jaaskelainen J et al (2007) Incidence of gliomas by anatomic location. Neuro-Oncology 9(3):319–325. https://doi.org/10.1215/15228517-2007-016
Laigle-Donadey F, Martin-Duverneuil N, Lejeune J, Criniere E, Capelle L, Duffau H, Cornu P, Broet P, Kujas M, Mokhtari K, Carpentier A, Sanson M, Hoang-Xuan K, Thillet J, Delattre JY (2004) Correlations between molecular profile and radiologic pattern in oligodendroglial tumors. Neurology 63(12):2360–2362
Mueller W, Hartmann C, Hoffmann A, Lanksch W, Kiwit J, Tonn J, Veelken J, Schramm J, Weller M, Wiestler OD, Louis DN, von Deimling A (2002) Genetic signature of oligoastrocytomas correlates with tumor location and denotes distinct molecular subsets. Am J Pathol 161(1):313–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64183-1
Zlatescu MC, TehraniYazdi A, Sasaki H, Megyesi JF, Betensky RA, Louis DN, Cairncross JG (2001) Tumor location and growth pattern correlate with genetic signature in oligodendroglial neoplasms. Cancer Res 61(18):6713–6715
Ali Kahn A, O'Brien DF, Kelly P, Phillips JP, Rawluk D, Bolger C, Pidgeon CN (2003) The anatomical distribution of cerebral gliomas in mobile phone users. Ir Med J 96(8):240–242
Liu TT, Achrol AS, Mitchell LA, Du WA, Loya JJ, Rodriguez SA et al (2016) Computational identification of tumor anatomic location associated with survival in 2 large cohorts of human primary glioblastomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 37(4):621–628. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4631.
Sanai N, Berger MS (2008) Glioma extent of resection and its impact on patient outcome. Neurosurgery 62(4):753–764; discussion 264-6. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000318159.21731.cf
Colen RR, Vangel M, Wang J, Gutman DA, Hwang SN, Wintermark M et al (2014) Imaging genomic mapping of an invasive MRI phenotype predicts patient outcome and metabolic dysfunction: a TCGA glioma phenotype research group project. BMC Med Genet 7:30. https://doi.org/10.1186/1755-8794-7-30
Lim DA, Cha S, Mayo MC, Chen MH, Keles E, VandenBerg S, Berger MS (2007) Relationship of glioblastoma multiforme to neural stem cell regions predicts invasive and multifocal tumor phenotype. Neuro-Oncology 9(4):424–429. https://doi.org/10.1215/15228517-2007-023
Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Kruchko C, Louis DN, Brat DJ, Gilbert MR, Petkov VI, Barnholtz-Sloan JS (2016) Completeness of required site-specific factors for brain and CNS tumors in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) 18 database (2004-2012, varying). J Neuro-Oncol 130(1):31–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-016-2217-7
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge KFRC, KIMS for the ethical permission and for diagnosis and histopathology of tissues, and Dr. M. Sailaja, Head, Department of Pathology.
Funding
The authors thank the financial assistance from the Department of Science and Technology (DST-India) (Grant no. SB/EMEQ-257/2013, SR/CSRI/196/2016), the Department of Biotechnology (DBT-India) (Grant no. BT/PR18168/MED/29/1064/2016, BT/PR13111/MED/29/149/2009), and the University with Potential for Excellence (UPE-India) (Grant no. UH/UGC/UPE-2/Interface studies/ Research Projects/B1.4, UH/UPE-2/28/2015) for lab funding. RDP is thankful to the Department of Biotechnology (DBT-India) (Award no. DBT JRF/2011–12/95) for student fellowship.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
The present studies involving human participants were approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (ICE), University of Hyderabad and KIMS Foundation Research Centre (KFRC), KIMS, Secunderabad, India. All subjects participating were completely anonymized.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Deshpande, R.P., Y. B. V. K., C., Panigrahi, M. et al. Prognostic Significance of Anatomic Origin and Evaluation of Survival Statistics of Astrocytoma Patients—a Tertiary Experience. Indian J Surg Oncol 10, 55–60 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-018-0820-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-018-0820-0