Abstract
Videotaped information has been shown to be effective in reducing parental anxiety and facilitating knowledge transfer in various clinical settings. There is lack of literature on the use of videotaped information during the pediatric oncology initial family disclosure meeting. The purpose of this study was to deliver an informative DVD, highlighting information on childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), to parents of children with newly diagnosed ALL and to assess if the DVD provided increased levels of satisfaction and decreased levels of anxiety in parents around the time of diagnosis. We surveyed 24 parents of children on active treatment for ALL, diagnosed between the ages of 1 and 18 years from 2008 to 2016 at The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada. Parents were provided a survey questionnaire assessing levels of satisfaction with information communicated by the healthcare team and anxiety following verbal disclosure and were asked to report satisfaction and anxiety levels immediately following viewing the DVD intervention. Twenty-three/24 (95.8%) parents surveyed reported seeking information from additional resources after disclosure. Of the 24 parents who watched the DVD, 12 (50.0%) watched it once, while 12 (50.0%) watched it twice or more. All parents were satisfied with DVD information, and there was a significant decrease in anxiety after viewing (P = 0.03). All 24 parents felt that the DVD was a useful educational tool. Videotaped information after verbal disclosure is an effective educational resource and is associated with reduced anxiety among parents of children with ALL.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The diagnosis of cancer in a child precipitates a state of crisis for a family. Parents must deal with their sick child, the new diagnosis and its implications, and the need to make treatment decisions in a relatively short period of time. Studies have demonstrated high stress levels among parents of children with cancer, particularly around the time of diagnosis and early treatment [1,2,3]. Information-seeking is a common coping strategy for parents [4] and may provide a sense of control important for engagement with the healthcare team around treatment decisions and in planning for the rest of the family [5, 6].
Oncology teams have established long-standing approaches to delivering information at the time of diagnosis. Providing patients with cancer and their families with an audiotape of the initial consultation has been shown to enhance satisfaction and improve information recall [7,8,9]. Videotaping of healthcare team family meetings in pediatrics have also been shown to be effective in increasing parental knowledge of infant vaccinations and pain management, to aid in providing informed consent for healthcare trials, and to facilitate parental education and reduce anxiety before pediatric preoperative anesthesia [10,11,12]. There is a paucity of literature on the use of videotaped information by parents of children with newly diagnosed cancer.
The objective of this pilot study was to provide a professionally produced DVD that included practical disease information and treatment side effects to parents of pediatric patients who were newly diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), the most common childhood malignancy [13], and assess changes in levels of satisfaction and anxiety around the time of diagnosis measured pre- and post-exposure to the DVD intervention.
Methods
Ethics board approval was obtained from the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada. Eligible participants were English-speaking parents of children with standard-risk or high-risk precursor B or T cell ALL, aged > 1 and < 18 years, diagnosed between 2008 and 2016 at the Hospital for Sick Children. Children were on active induction treatment at the time of parental recruitment for this study. Parents of children with very high-risk ALL (Philadelphia-positive, Hypodiploidy), infant ALL, and mature B cell ALL were excluded due to the DVD not covering disclosure elements, such as therapy-specific components, required for these specific high-risk disease types. A pre-post survey design was utilized to measure satisfaction and anxiety levels around the time of diagnosis disclosure.
Intervention Development
Standard practice of diagnosis disclosure at our institution consists of a verbal discussion between the attending staff oncologist and the affected family of the child with cancer. There is slight variability in the attendance of additional members of the healthcare team at the disclosure discussion, which can include the nurse practitioner or social worker. The DVD was designed as an educational aid for parents of children with newly diagnosed leukemia to supplement verbal information received from the attending physician at the time of diagnosis disclosure. To assist with the intervention development, caregivers of children with newly diagnosed standard or high-risk ALL were approached within 1 month of their child’s diagnosis to complete a semi-structured interview with a Clinical Research Assistant (CRA) using the “Pre-Production Parental Information Needs and Satisfaction Survey” shown in Online Resource 1. Twelve English-speaking caregivers consented to participate over a 12-month period. The survey was completed with the CRA over 20–30 min. The CRA took notes and transcribed comments for the open-ended questions included. Parent demographics, patient treatment protocols, and a 5-point Likert scale [14] were used to measure satisfaction with communication at disclosure and the level of anxiety at diagnosis. As part of this survey, parents were asked if they sought out additional disease information from tertiary resources, and what specific information about ALL would they want to see in an educational DVD.
Using the needs assessment feedback from these survey results and available literature at the time, an interactive DVD was developed by a professional production team with direction from two pediatric oncologists (OA and AP), a pediatric psychologist, a pediatric oncology nurse, and two parents as key informants. Two pediatric oncologists (OA and AP) composed the storyboard for the DVD based on the needs assessment of the parent population used in the DVD development process. Revisions were implemented using feedback from physicians, nurses, allied health professionals, and parents. This interactive DVD addressed information needs including, but not limited to, an introduction to ALL with animation figures of the leukemic cells, treatment plans, chemotherapy drugs, and most common side effects; procedures; behavioral changes and emotional reactions related to diagnosis and treatment in the sick child, siblings, and parents; interviews with long-term survivors and parents, as well as support systems and day-to-day activities during and after therapy. The DVD video is 23 min in length, in English with no subtitles, and is now readily available on YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Mls5TViEhg).
DVD Intervention Assessment
Parents of children with newly diagnosed ALL were monitored for study eligibility and approached by the attending staff oncologist (OA and AP) for participation. Given the nature of this pilot study, a convenience sampling method was used by the staff oncologist for participant recruitment. Staffing changes in the research team during the study recruitment window resulted in participant accrual delays. Upon obtaining written consent, the DVD was provided to parents after the verbal disclosure by the attending staff physician to view at their leisure. Parents were asked to complete a “Post-Production Parental Needs and Satisfaction Survey” (see Online Resource 2) within 1 month of their child’s diagnosis. This paper survey was given to parents to take home and was mailed back or submitted in-person to the oncologist in the clinic once completed. Parents were asked the language spoken at home, if they had spoken with a social worker or oncologist at verbal disclosure, and to identify the use of any other tertiary resources used to learn more about ALL at the time of diagnosis. Before viewing the DVD, parents were asked to self-report the levels of satisfaction with the information provided and anxiety experienced following verbal disclosure using a 5-point Likert scale [14]. Satisfaction was measured using the following scale: 1 = “not at all satisfied,” 2 = “unsatisfied,” 3 = “somewhat satisfied,” 4 = “satisfied,” 5 = “very satisfied”; whereas anxiety was measured as: 1 = “increased a lot,” 2 = “somewhat increased,” 3 = “not affected,” 4 = “relieved somewhat,” 5 = “relieved a lot.” Parents were then asked to complete the DVD intervention section of the survey questionnaire after watching the video. Information gathered in this section included the number of times the DVD was watched, overall satisfaction with the information provided on the DVD, topics not covered by the DVD that they wanted to be covered, the usefulness of the DVD, and how the information in the DVD affected anxiety levels. The latter part of the survey was completed after the verbal disclosure section was finished so that each participant acted as his/her own control in determining the effectiveness of the DVD on information satisfaction and anxiety after viewing. Pre- and post-intervention anxiety and satisfaction levels following verbal disclosure and viewing the DVD were measured using the same Likert scale to ensure consistent measurements.
Statistical Analysis
Given the nature of this study, data analysis was predominantly descriptive. Counts and proportions were used to describe categorical data. Due to the relatively small number of subjects in this study, Fisher’s exact test was used to test the association between categorical data. The two main outcomes of interest were (1) satisfaction with the information provided in the diagnosis disclosure conversation and DVD intervention and (2) self-reported anxiety levels following verbal disclosure and viewing the intervention. Survey responses from the 5-point Likert scale for satisfaction and anxiety were dichotomized into ≥ 3 and < 3 groupings. Satisfaction scores of 1 or 2 were classified as “unsatisfied” and a 3, 4, or 5 were considered “satisfied.” Similarly, anxiety level scores of 1 or 2 were grouped as “heightened” anxiety and a 3, 4, or 5 were considered “relieved.” Dichotomization was performed due to the small study sample and to capture the overall change in sentiment for our outcomes of interest, as we were less interested in the degree of response change. McNemar’s test using exact methods was then used to test the association between these paired dichotomous data. All P values reflect two-sided tests. Analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4.
Results
Thirty-six families of children with newly diagnosed ALL at our institution were approached to participate, of which 30 agreed to take the survey home. A total of 24 of the 30 parents that agreed to take the survey home returned completed intervention assessment surveys (Online Resource 2), representing an 80% response rate. Patient and parent demographics, as well as the informational needs of parents following a child diagnosed with ALL, are shown in Table 1. English was the primary language spoken at home in 17/24 (70.8%) interviewed parents, although all were fluent in English. Primary language spoken at home had no significant influence on the level of satisfaction with the information provided during verbal disclosure (P = 1.00) or during the viewing of the DVD (P = 1.00), nor on anxiety after verbal disclosure (P = 1.00) or after viewing the DVD (P = 0.46).
Almost all parents (95.8%) sought information from tertiary resources after verbal disclosure. Among these resources, information from other healthcare team members (83.3%), such as oncologists, nurses, social workers, dieticians, and pharmacists, was most frequently reported. Additional resources include the internet (79.2%), printed materials (75.0%), and families of other children with ALL (62.5%). Information detailing the side effects of chemotherapy (87.5%) and simple explanations of medical terms (83.3%) were most frequently requested as additional information. Reported sources of other resources and the informational needs of parents are shown in Table 1.
After receiving the DVD intervention following verbal disclosure, all parents reported watching the DVD; 12 parents (50.0%) reported watching the DVD once and 12 (50.0%) watched it twice or more. Responses to the survey pre- and post-viewing the DVD are described in Table 2. Immediately following disclosure, a total of 8 of the 24 parents (33.3%) reported that the verbal disclosure heightened their anxiety level (Likert scores of 1 or 2). After viewing the DVD, only 2 of 24 parents (8.3%) reported continued heightened anxiety levels (P = 0.03). Of these two survey respondents who reported no decrease in anxiety levels after DVD viewing, one parent initially reported that anxiety “increased a lot” after verbal disclosure which then decreased to “somewhat increased” after the DVD viewing, while the other parent reported anxiety score remained unchanged after the DVD viewing. All 24 parents reported satisfaction with the information received following verbal disclosure, and all were satisfied with information after viewing the DVD (P = 1.00).
All surveyed parents felt that the DVD was a useful tool, with 11 (45.8%) classifying the enclosed information as “helpful” and 13 (54.2%) as “very helpful” (Table 2). Twenty parents (83.3%) thought that the level of information within the DVD was “just the right amount,” two thought it was “not enough,” one as “too basic/weak,” and one as “too much/technical.” Six parents (25.0%) hoped for some information that was not included in the DVD, such as “whether cord blood cell storage was useful or not,” or “proper handling of all drugs and diapers at home,” “more detailed information about treatment protocols, especially after the induction phase,” and “more information about coping mechanisms for my child to the medication and anxiety.”
Discussion
Our pilot study showed that using a supplemental DVD, which contains important information on various aspects of pediatric ALL, was a useful educational tool for the small group of parents who participated in this study. All parents reported satisfaction with the information provided in the DVD. Anxiety levels reported following verbal disclosure were reduced after viewing the educational DVD (P = 0.03), suggesting a positive impact on the emotional distress frequently seen in parents of children with cancer. However, 2 of 24 (8.3%) parents maintained heightened anxiety levels even after watching the DVD intervention. This observation highlights the importance of maintaining an open dialog throughout the clinical course of treatment between the healthcare team and impacted families, ensuring resources are available to assuage the emotional distress of parents during this time.
Using tertiary resources to seek additional disease information was reported by 94% of parents in our study, further supporting the notion that the informational needs of parents are not always met from verbal disclosure alone [15,16,17]. These needs include information on the diagnosis of ALL, treatment and diagnostic tests, cure rates, caring for their child, emotional impact, side effects, physical impact, coping with painful procedures, and impact on the family [18, 19]. Pacing, consistency, and information provided in a reassuring manner have been identified as important for how information is provided to parents at the time of their child’s cancer diagnosis [20]. Providing families of children with ALL with a copy of the DVD allows for the opportunity to view it at their own leisure, in a familiar and comfortable environment. Half of the families watched the DVD twice or more. This flexibility may assist parents’ recall of the content of the verbal disclosure, especially during the emotionally stressful time immediately following diagnosis, and may address different learning style preferences of parents and families [21]. Although parents are generally satisfied with the information they receive from their oncology team, many report feeling overwhelmed and have difficulty recalling or assimilating all the information [22,23,24]. Some studies suggest that more information giving may lead to increased parental anxiety due to information overload [24, 25]. However, parents still consider detailed knowledge at the time of verbal disclosure to be important for decision making [26] and providing an educational DVD video can facilitate knowledge transfer for parents.
Six (25%) of the parents surveyed felt that the DVD intervention was missing information which they hoped would have been included. These topics included the usefulness of cord blood cell storage, handling of drugs and diapers at home, more detailed information about the specifics of induction treatment, and coping mechanisms for their child. Interestingly, these detailed comments suggest that parents had already mined social media and other web-based resources for information and knew what questions needed to be addressed. These observations support the phenomena of an Internet-informed patient in the twenty-first-century which has been well established [27].
Videotaped information for educational use in adult cancer patients has been well studied to enhance patient knowledge, improve satisfaction, and aid in decision making [28, 29]. Previous randomized controlled studies have assessed the impact of a pre-treatment educational video in adult cancer patients and found that participants who watched the video reported lower scores of anxiety and depression, higher information recall of self-care and side effects, while also reporting higher satisfaction with information provided compared to those who did not watch it [30, 31]. However, the use of videotaped information in the pediatric oncology population is limited. Hazen et al. [32] developed a brief 20-min informative DVD for parents of children with newly diagnosed ALL outlining leukemia and explaining informed consent for pediatric randomized clinical trials. Although with only a sample size of 12, 92% of parents reported that the DVD aided in understanding concepts the physician later provided and acted to stimulate them to ask more questions during informed consent conferences [32]. Pediatric cancer disease information is readily available on popular social media platforms, such as YouTube; however, content is typically created by patients or families and seldom is it created by medical professionals or contained useful information [33]. In this study, we present a collaborative effort between physicians, nurses, social workers, and parents to provide an effective informative DVD tailored to caregivers facing their child’s cancer diagnosis. Videotaped information grants the opportunity for patients and families to review material as often as is required, aiding in the facilitation of disease knowledge and processes. In pediatric oncology, this videotaped information can also be shared with the patient and family and friends, as an educational tool to explain the illness.
Our study illustrates that the use of an educational DVD about ALL given at the time of verbal disclosure can be an effective ancillary resource for parents of children diagnosed with leukemia. To address the small sample size, conservative statistical tests using exact methods were implemented to prevent type I errors in our analyses. However, the small number of participants and the lack of a control group are limitations of this study and should be considered for future research. In addition, only English-speaking parents were eligible for participation in this study and the socioeconomic status (SES) of each family was not measured. A low SES has been previously linked to a decreased understanding of information during informed consent [34]. If further research is to be done, a more generalized approach must be implemented to include families from diverse backgrounds.
Despite these limitations, our study provides valuable information about the benefits of videotaped information in pediatric oncology and supports the use of digital information to supplement information provided during verbal disclosure.
References
McCarthy MC, Ashley DM, Lee KJ, Anderson VA (2012) Predictors of acute and posttraumatic stress symptoms in parents following their child's cancer diagnosis. J Trauma Stress 25(5):558–566. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.21745
Bally JM, Holtslander L, Duggleby W, Wright K, Thomas R, Spurr S, Mpofu C (2014) Understanding parental experiences through their narratives of restitution, chaos, and quest: improving care for families experiencing childhood cancer. J Fam Nurs 20(3):287–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/1074840714532716
Sultan S, Leclair T, Rondeau E, Burns W, Abate C (2016) A systematic review on factors and consequences of parental distress as related to childhood cancer. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 25(4):616–637. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12361
Kilicarslan-Toruner E, Akgun-Citak E (2013) Information-seeking behaviours and decision-making process of parents of children with cancer. Eur J Oncol Nurs 17(2):176–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2012.03.001
Sisk BA, Friedrich AB, Mozersky J, Walsh H, DuBois J (2018) Core functions of communication in pediatric medicine: an exploratory analysis of parent and patient narratives. J Cancer Educ [Epub ahead of print]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-018-1458-x
Nyborn JA, Olcese M, Nickerson T, Mack JW (2016) “Don’t try to cover the sky with your hands”: Parents’ experiences with prognosis communication about their children with advanced cancer. J Palliat Med 19(6):626–631. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2015.0472
Eden OB, Black I, MacKinlay GA, Emery AE (1994) Communication with parents of children with cancer. Palliat Med 8(2):105–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/026921639400800203
Masera G, Beltrame F, Corbetta A, Fraschini D, Adamoli L, Jankovic M, Spinetta JJ (2003) Audiotaping communication of the diagnosis of childhood leukemia: parents’ evaluation. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 25(5):368–371
Ong LM, Visser MR, Lammes FB, van Der Velden J, Kuenen BC, de Haes JC (2000) Effect of providing cancer patients with the audiotaped initial consultation on satisfaction, recall, and quality of life: a randomized, double-blind study. J Clin Oncol 18(16):3052–3060. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2000.18.16.3052
Berghmans J, Weber F, van Akoleyen C, Utens E, Adriaenssens P, Klein J, Himpe D (2012) Audiovisual aid viewing immediately before pediatric induction moderates the accompanying parents' anxiety. Paediatr Anaesth 22(4):386–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9592.2011.03767.x
Sheridan, R., J. Martin-Kerry, I. Watt, S. Higgins, S. R. Stones, D. H. Taylor, and P. Knapp. 2018. User testing digital, multimedia information to inform children, adolescents and their parents about healthcare trials. J Child Health Care:1367493518807325. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1367493518807325.
Taddio A, Parikh C, Yoon EW, Sgro M, Singh H, Habtom E, Ilersich AF, Pillai Riddell R, Shah V (2015) Impact of parent-directed education on parental use of pain treatments during routine infant vaccinations: a cluster randomized trial. PAIN 156(1):185–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.0000000000000021
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2018) Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin 68(1):7–30. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21442
Likert R (1932) A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol 22(140):1–55
Aburn G, Gott M (2011) Education given to parents of children newly diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a narrative review. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs 28(5):300–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043454211409585
Greenzang KA, Cronin AM, Kang TI, Mack JW (2018) Parental distress and desire for information regarding long-term implications of pediatric cancer treatment. Cancer 124(23):4529–4537. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.31772.
Kaye E, Mack JW (2013) Parent perceptions of the quality of information received about a child's cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer 60(11):1896–1901. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.24652
Kessel RM, Roth M, Moody K, Levy A (2013) Day one talk: parent preferences when learning that their child has cancer. Support Care Cancer 21(11):2977–2982. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-1874-8
Rodgers CC, Laing CM, Herring RA, Tena N, Leonardelli A, Hockenberry M, Hendricks-Ferguson V (2016) Understanding effective delivery of patient and family education in pediatric oncology: a systematic review from the children’s oncology group. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs 33(6):432–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043454216659449
Hentea C, Cheng ER, Bauer NS, Mueller EL (2018) Parent-centered communication at time of pediatric cancer diagnosis: a systematic review. Pediatr Blood Cancer 65(8):e27070. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.27070
Rodgers CC, Stegenga K, Withycombe JS, Sachse K, Kelly KP (2016) Processing information after a child’s cancer diagnosis-how parents learn. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs 33(6):447–459. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043454216668825.
Aburn G, Gott M (2014) Education given to parents of children newly diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: the parent’s perspective. Pediatr Nurs 40(5):243–248 256
Flury M, Caflisch U, Ullmann-Bremi A, Spichiger E (2011) Experiences of parents with caring for their child after a cancer diagnosis. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs 28(3):143–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043454210378015
Greenzang KA, Dauti A, Mack JW (2018) Parent perspectives on information about late effects of childhood cancer treatment and their role in initial treatment decision making. Pediatr Blood Cancer 65(6):e26978. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.26978
Kastel A, Enskar K, Bjork O (2011) Parents’ views on information in childhood cancer care. Eur J Oncol Nurs 15(4):290–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2010.10.007
Sisk BA, Mack JW, Ashworth R, DuBois J (2018) Communication in pediatric oncology: state of the field and research agenda. Pediatr Blood Cancer 65(1):e26727. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.26727
Tan SS, Goonawardene N (2017) Internet health information seeking and the patient-physician relationship: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res 19(1):e9. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5729.
Gysels M, Higginson IJ (2007) Interactive technologies and videotapes for patient education in cancer care: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. Support Care Cancer 15(1):7–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-006-0112-z
Winston K, Grendarova P, Rabi D (2018) Video-based patient decision aids: a scoping review. Patient Educ Couns 101(4):558–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2017.10.009
Kinnane N, Thompson L (2008) Evaluation of the addition of video-based education for patients receiving standard pre-chemotherapy education. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 17(4):328–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2354.2007.00846.x
Thomas R, Daly M, Perryman B, Stockton D (2000) Forewarned is forearmed—benefits of preparatory information on video cassette for patients receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy—a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cancer 36(12):1536–1543. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-8049(00)00136-2
Hazen RA, Eder M, Drotar D, Zyzanski S, Reynolds AE, Reynolds CP, Kodish E, Noll RB, Team Multi-Site Intervention Study to Improve Consent Research (2010) A feasibility trial of a video intervention to improve informed consent for parents of children with leukemia. Pediatr Blood Cancer 55(1):113–118. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.22411
Clerici CA, Veneroni L, Bisogno G, Trapuzzano A, Ferrari A (2012) Videos on rhabdomyosarcoma on YouTube: an example of the availability of information on pediatric tumors on the web. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 34(8):e329–e331. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPH.0b013e31825886f8
Miller VA, Drotar D, Burant C, Kodish E (2005) Clinician-parent communication during informed consent for pediatric leukemia trials. J Pediatr Psychol 30(3):219–229. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsi032
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics board approval was obtained from the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Angela Punnett and Oussama Abla co-senior author
Electronic Supplementary Material
ESM 1
(PDF 244 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Di Giuseppe, G., Pole, J.D., Abla, O. et al. Impact of Videotaped Information on the Experience of Parents of Children with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. J Canc Educ 35, 479–484 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-019-1485-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-019-1485-2