Abstract
Background
Sigmoid volvulus is a common surgical emergency in many regions of the world that carries significant morbidity and mortality. Volvulus occurs when an air-filled segment of the colon twists about its mesentery. In developing countries, it is a major cause of colonic obstruction. The sigmoid colon is involved in up to 90% of cases. It can be present as acute, sub-acute or chronic. Acute sigmoid volvulus requires emergency surgery. Various methods are used in its management.
Aim
The purpose of our study was to evaluate the comparative study of single-stage resection and anastomosis with Hartmann’s procedure for management of acute left-sided colonic obstruction due to acute sigmoid volvulus.
Methods
This prospective study was conducted in a consecutive series of 122 patients with acute sigmoid volvulus, admitted to the department of general surgery at M.K.C.G Medical College. All 122 patients were submitted to laparotomy. In different groups, 87 patients underwent primary resection of the affected sigmoid colon with anastomosis while 35 patients underwent surgical resection of the rectosigmoid colon with closure of the rectal stump and formation of an end colostomy (Hartmann’s procedure). The outcome of the two procedures was analysed in terms of mortality, postoperative complications and hospital stay.
Results
This study clearly shows that there is no statistically significant result between the two procedures, other than a slightly longer hospital stay recorded for the resection and anastomosis group than that of the Hartmann’s group.
Conclusion
This study demonstrated that the outcome of two procedures are the same. Resection and anastomosis should be performed safely in uncomplicated acute sigmoid; in complicated cases, Hartmann’s procedure is the surgery of choice.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Katsikogiannis N, Machairiotis N, Zarogoulidis P, et al. Management of sigmoid volvulus avoiding sigmoid resection. Case Rep Gastroenterol 2012; 6: 293–9
Avots-Avotins KV, Waugh DE. Colon volvulus and the geriatric patient. Surg Clin North Am 1982; 62: 248–60
Raveenthiran V. Observations on the pattern of vomiting and morbidity in patients with acute sigmoid volvulus. J Postgrad Med. 2004; 50: 27–9
Naaeder SB, Archampong ED. One-stage resection of acute sigmoid volvulus. Br J Surg 1995; 82: 1635–6
Welch GH, Anderson JR. Acute volvulus of the sigmoid colon. World J Surg 1987; 11: 258–62
Lal SK, Morgenstern R, Vinjirayer EP, et al. Sigmoid volvulus an update. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2006; 16: 175–87.
Cuschieri A, Steele PJC, Moosa AR. Disorders of the colon and rectum. In: Essential Surgical Practice. 4th edition 2002; p. 569–626
Martin D, McWhirt E, Napoli P. Colonic volvulus. The Army Medical Center experience 1983-1987. Am Surg 1991; 57: 295–300
Sule A, Misauno M, Opaluwa AS, et al. One stage procedure in the management of acute sigmoid volvulus without colonic lavage. The Surgeon 2007; 5: 268–70
Remzi FH, Oncel M, Hull TL, et al. Current indications for blow-hole colostomy:ileostomy procedure. A single center experience. Int J Colorectal Dis 2003; 18: 361–4
Poon RT, Law WL, Chu KW, et al. Emergency resection and primary anastomosis for left-sided obstructing colorectal carcinoma in the elderly. Br J Surg 1998; 85: 1539–42
Madiba TE, Thomson SR. The management of sigmoid volvulus. J R Coll Surg Edinb 2000; 45: 74–80
Grossmann EM, Longo WE, Stratton MD, et al. Sigmoid volvulus in Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43: 414–8
Atamanalp SS, Ozturk G. Sigmoid volvulus in the elderly: outcomes of a 43-year, 453-patient experience. Surg Today 2011; 41: 514–9
Khanna AK, Kumar P, Khanna R. Sigmoid volvulus: study from a north India hospital. Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42: 1081- 4
Burrell HC, Baker DM, Wardrop P, Evans AJ. Significant plain film findings in sigmoid volvulus. Clin Radiol 1994; 49: 317–9
Slim K, Vicaut E, Panis Y, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of colorectal surgery with or without mechanical bowel preparation. Br J Surg 2004; 91: 1125–30
Zmora O, Mahajna A, Bar-Zakai B, et al. Colon and rectal surgery without mechanical bowel preparation. A randomized prospective trial. Ann Surg 2003; 237: 363–7
Fa-Si-Oen P, Roumen R, Buitenweg J, et al. Mechanical bowel preparation or not? Outcome of a multicenter, randomized trial in elective open colon surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48: 1509–16
Gurel M, Alic B, Bac B, et al. Intraoperative colonic irrigation in the treatment of acute sigmoid volvulus. Br J Surg 1989; 76: 957–8
Gibney EJ. On-table lavage in the management of sigmoid volvulus: A review. West Afr J Med 1992; 11: 223–5
Smith SR, Connolly JC, Gilmore OJ. The effect of faecal loading on colonic anastomotic healing. Br J Surg 1983; 70: 49–50
Bruusgaard C. Volvulus of the sigmoid colon and its treatment. Surgery 1947; 22: 466–78
Akcan A, Akyildiz H, Artis T, et al. Feasibility of single-stage resection and primary anastomosis in patients with acute noncomplicated sigmoid volvulus. Am J Surg 2007; 193: 421–6
Okello TR, Ogwang DM, Kisa P, et al. Sigmoid volvulus and ileosigmoid knotting at St. Mary’s Hospital Lacor in Gulu, Uganda. East Cent Afr J Surg 2009; 14: 58–64
Nuhu A, Jah A. Acute sigmoid volvulus in a West African population. Ann Afr Med 2010; 9: 86–90
Ören D, Atamanalp SS, Aydinli B, et al.; An Algorithm for the management of sigmoid colon volvulus and the safety of primary resection: experience with 827 cases. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2007; 50: 489–97
De U, Ghosh S. Single stage primary anastomosis without colonic lavage for left-sided colonic obstruction due to acute sigmoid volvulus: a prospective study of one hundred and ninety-seven cases. ANZ J Surg 2003; 73: 390–2
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pattanayak, S., Saha, D., Bara, B.K. et al. Comparison of primary resection and anastomosis with Hartmann’s procedure in management of acute sigmoid volvulus. Hellenic J Surg 88, 263–267 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13126-016-0329-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13126-016-0329-3