Introduction

The medium-coarse sands (CS) of intertidal zone and shallow sea were dredged and exhausted for large-scale land reclamation projects along the coastal areas of China. However, the silty-fine sands (FS) were not used and wasted due to the potential liquefaction problem that aggravated the shortage of backfill materials for reclamation projects. To solve the problem, laboratory experiments were conducted to investigate the liquefaction resistance of dredged silty-FS under different influencing factors, namely silt content, clay content, initial relative density, consolidation stress and consolidation stress ratio. Physical experiments were not performed for all potential working conditions and influencing factors because they were expensive and time consuming. Particle flow code (PFC) numerical simulations were performed to supplement the physical experiments and explain the liquefaction from the micro perspective. Numerical simulations were conducted to discuss the influence of other potential influencing factors on liquefaction.

Liquefaction is one of the disastrous forms of geotechnical failures that occurs due to the rapid accumulation of pore water pressure and reduction in effective confining stress (Rahman et al. 2014). The dynamic response and liquefaction behavior of dredged silty-FS and the possibility of utilizing silty-FS in land reclamation should be investigated. However, corresponding studies have mainly focused on clean sands or sands with a small portion of fine gravel (Ishihara 1993; Liu and Yu 1999; Xenaki and Athanasopoulos 2003; Baziar and Sharafi 2011; Monkul and Yamamuro 2011; Takch et al. 2016). Cundall and Strack (1979) first investigated the mechanical properties of granular media using a discrete element method (DEM). Subsequently, the DEM was widely used in investigating the micro-mechanism of sand liquefaction (Ishihara et al. 1975; Ng and Dobry 1994; Zhou et al. 2000, 2009; Zhou and Chi 2003; Sitharam 2003; Sitharam and Vinod 2009; Liu et al. 2007a, b). Researchers have analyzed the liquefaction mechanism, trigger conditions, and liquefaction criterion of silty sands (Bouckovalas et al. 2003; Papadopoulou and Tika 2008; Stamatopoulos 2010; Baziar and Sharafi 2011; Lee et al. 2012; Jafarian et al. 2013; Sadrekarimi 2013; Park and Kim 2013; Karim and Alam 2014; Arab et al. 2014; Dobry et al. 2015; Monkul et al. 2015; Takch et al. 2016; Huang and Wang 2016; El-Sekelly et al. 2016; Kim et al. 2016) and sand-silt mixtures (Belkhatir et al. 2011; Xenaki and Athanasopoulos 2003; Stamatopoulos et al. 2015). The effect of fine contents on liquefaction susceptibility had contradictory results. The cyclic liquefaction resistance of silty sands increased (Amini and Qi 2000), decreased (Belkhatir et al. 2010; Stamatopoulos 2010), and decreased to a certain fine content and increased (Koester 1994; Polito and Martin 2001; Xenaki and Athanasopoulos 2003; Ueng et al. 2004; Ravishankar 2006; Papadopoulou and Tika 2008; Yassine et al. 2015) with the increase in fine contents. Polito (1999) reported that the influence of mean grain size (D50) on liquefaction resistance was more obvious than the gradation of materials. Yilmaz and Mollamahmutoglu (2009) assessed that graded sands with small D50 was susceptible to liquefaction. The sand sample with small void ratio range was susceptible to liquefaction if the D50 of different graded sand samples was nearly the same. Belkhatir et al. (2014) confirmed that the granulometric characteristics had a significant influence on the generation of excess pore pressure of sand-silty mixture samples. Taiba et al. (2016) reported that the shear strength linearly and logarithmically decreased with the decrease in grain sizes. The tests in the sands of Toyoura Ishihara, Ottawa, and Monterey showed a considerable increase in cyclic strength with the decrease in sand void ratio (Finn et al. 1971). The cyclic strength of similar void ratio decreased with the increase in consolidation stress. Stamatopoulos et al. (2015) investigated the effect of preloading on liquefaction cyclic strength of silty sands in the free-field condition. The test results showed an obvious increase in liquefaction cyclic strength with the increase in pre-stress ratio. These studies promoted the analysis on liquefaction susceptibility of silty sands. However, the physical–mechanical properties of dredged silty-FS were relatively different with undisturbed silty-FS under natural sedimentation conditions. First, the dredged silty-FS were artificially formed using dredging technology. Second, the dredged silty-FS experienced a short history under artificial sediment environment. Third, silty-FS were unusually used as dredger fill source when medium CS were sufficient. Few studies have investigated the liquefaction behavior of dredged silty-FS for land reclamation.

In this study, the liquefaction behavior of dredged silty-FS was investigated using cyclic triaxial tests. On the basis of test results, the effects of five independent variables on CSR were evaluated. The microscopic liquefaction behavior and extended influencing factors of dredged silty-FS were analyzed using the PFC model. Countermeasures were suggested to improve the CSR of dredged silty-FS. This study can be used as a reference for land reclamations with sufficient silty-FS and insufficient medium-CS sources.

Background

The eastern economic zone of Shantou City includes Xinjin, Xinxi, and Tagangwei areas. The economic zone is 12.5 km long with a planning area of 24.35 km2, which is from the Bay Bridge in the west to Chenghailaiwu in the east (Fig. 1). Infrastructure construction, which includes the major and subordinate roads of these areas, is significant for the development of the eastern economic zone. On the basis of previous exploration data, the saturated sands within 20 m of the field include dredged silty-FS (layer ①), FS (layer ①1), and medium FS (layer ③). Dredged silty-FS are loose and saturated with an average thickness of 7 m. Dredged silty-FS have severe liquefaction layers with an average liquefaction index of 19.09. FS have medium liquefaction layers with an average liquefaction index of 15.79. Medium FS have mild to medium liquefaction layers with an average thickness of 2.5 m and their average liquefaction index is 4.27. Therefore, secondary disasters caused by liquefaction in engineering construction should be considered. The liquefaction behavior of dredged silty-FS should be investigated by using cyclic triaxial tests and numerical simulation method, and the countermeasures for land reclamation should be proposed.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Dredged location of Tagang Area, Shekou, China

Laboratory experiment

Materials and methods

Cyclic triaxial tests were performed to simulate the dynamic response of dredged silty-FS. The dredged specimens were collected from Tagangwei Eastern Economic Zone of Shantou City, Guangdong Province, China. The grain size distributions of dredged materials are presented in Fig. 2. The specimens were pretreated by drying. The grain sieves with a size of 0.075–0.25 mm were used as sands. The grains finer than 0.075 mm were used as silt, and clay particles were prepared by kaolin. Silty-FS were boiled and cooled before the test. The clay particles were added and stirred in the pulp after soaking with vacuum exhaust. The mixture was layered into a split mold tied in a latex film, and the split mold was removed under negative pressure. The maximum and minimum dry densities of the samples were 1.62 and 1.30 g/cm3, respectively. The maximum and minimum void ratios were 1.077 and 0.667, respectively.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Grain size distribution of dredged materials

A GDS dynamic triaxial apparatus was adopted in the tests (Fig. 3). The dimensions of the samples were 39.1 mm in diameter and 80 mm in height. The samples were first saturated with percolating carbon dioxide through the specimen for 30 min followed by the application of de-aired water. Back pressure was applied to complete the saturation for 120 min. The minimum B value obtained for the tests was 0.95. A frequency of 1.0 Hz was maintained in the entire test program. An initial liquefaction criterion (Seed and Lee 1966) was adopted in the failure criterion of isotropic consolidation. Liquefaction occurred (\(\Delta u/{\sigma ^{\prime}_{\text{c}}}=1\)) when the pore pressure exceeded the initial effective confining pressure. Experience has shown that coarse-grained sands or sands with few clay contents were easy to liquefy completely. However, the monitored excess pore pressure was small although the deformation was large for fine-grained sands with high clay content. A deformation criterion was adopted in the failure criterion of anisotropic consolidation for all cases. The corresponding value of double amplitude strain was 5% (εf = 5%).

Fig. 3
figure 3

GDS test equipment

The influences of silt content, clay content, initial relative density, consolidation stress, and consolidation stress ratio on the liquefaction of dredged silty-FS were discussed in five working conditions (Table 1).

Table 1 Cyclic triaxial test design

Liquefaction behavior observed in cyclic triaxial tests

Five series of stress-controlled cyclic triaxial tests were conducted on dredged silty-FS samples with different silt content (fs), clay content (fc), initial relative density (fird), consolidation stress (fcs), and consolidation stress ratio (fcsr) under undrained conditions to simulate the undrained field behavior during earthquakes. Other constants were maintained with the change of one parameter to investigate the influence on liquefaction resistance characteristics. The variation of CSR (\({\text{CSR}}={{{\sigma _{\text{d}}}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{{\sigma _{\text{d}}}} {2{{\sigma ^{\prime}}_{\text{c}}}}}} \right. \kern-0pt} {2{{\sigma ^{\prime}}_{\text{c}}}}}\)) with the required number of cycles N for liquefaction is shown in Fig. 4. For a given number of cycles, CSR decreased with the increase of fs from 0 to 18% (Fig. 4a). CSR sharply decreased (approximately 22%) when fs value was greater than 6%. A limited percentage of silt in dredged silty-FS decreased the liquefaction resistance obviously. Silt should be separated from FS in the dredging process. The effect of fc on CSR is shown in Fig. 4b. For a given number of cycles, CSR initially decreased with the increase on fc up to a threshold value of 12% and increased with the increase on fc. The effect of fird on CSR is shown in Fig. 4c. CSR increased by approximately 25% with the increase of fird from 52 to 92%. The effect of fird on CSR was not obvious. The liquefaction resistance was improved by improving fird using convenient and economic foundation treatments, such as dynamic compaction and vibroflotation. The variation of CSR with fcs is shown in Fig. 4d. For a given number of cycles, CSR decreased with the increase of fcs from 50 to 300 kPa. In addition, the effect of the increase on fcs gradually decreased. Few changes were observed in CSR when fcs > 200 kPa. The liquefaction resistance of dredged silty-FS was improved using preloading or overload methods. On the contrary, CSR increased with the increase of fcsr from 1 to 2 (Fig. 4e). According to Wang and Zhou (2001), CSR increased with the increase of fcsr and decreased when fcsr increased to threshold kc, which can be described as

Fig. 4
figure 4

Variation of CSR, \({{{\sigma _{\text{d}}}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{{\sigma _{\text{d}}}} {2{{\sigma ^{\prime}}_{\text{c}}}}}} \right. \kern-0pt} {2{{\sigma ^{\prime}}_{\text{c}}}}}\), with number of cycles, N

$${k_{\text{c}}}=\frac{{1+\sin \phi }}{{1 - \sin \phi }},$$
(1)

where φ is the initial dilatancy angle.

In this way, many tests and future studies should be conducted for kc with different fcsr.

Influence factor analysis for liquefaction behavior

The cyclic resistance ratio, CRR30, is defined as the CSR that causes liquefaction at 30 cycles of loading. On the basis of the cyclic triaxial test results (Fig. 4), the variation of CRR30 with different influencing factors is shown in Fig. 5. CRR30 increased with the increase of fird and fcsr (positive effect) and decreased with the increase of fs and fcs (negative effect) (Fig. 5). CRR30 initially decreased and reached the minimum value at a threshold of clay content (fc = 12%) and increased with the increase of fc. According to Thevayanagam and Martin (2002), the presence of fines (silt and clay contents in this study) reduced the liquefaction resistance of soil samples up to the threshold value and sharply increased. The distributed fines among the voids contacted coarse particles when fine content was less than the threshold value. The fines did not significantly influence the mechanical behavior of soil samples. The fines caused the instability and compressibility of the structure that resulted in the decrease of resistance. The mechanical behavior of soil samples was dominated by fine contacts when the fine content was more than the threshold value (Lade and Yamamuro 1997). This condition indicated that fines had a positive contribution and increased the soil resistance to liquefaction. Therefore, a possible critical value for silt content was observed in which the cyclic resistance sharply increased.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Variation of cyclic resistance ratio, CRR30, with various parameters

As shown in the range of Fig. 5, the effect of single factor on CRR30 is shown in Fig. 6. The difference of CRR30, ∆CRR30 = 0.17, had the most obvious effect on CRR30 when fs varied from 0 to 18%. fcs had the second obvious effect. ∆CRR30 = 0.07 when fcs increased from 50 to 300 kPa. fc and fird had an equal effect due to equal ∆CRR30. fcsr had a minimal impact on CRR30. ∆CRR30 = 0.04 when fcsr varied from 1 to 2. The effect of single factor was sorted as fs > fcs > fc and fird > fcsr.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Effect of different single factors on CRR30

Regression analysis on liquefaction behavior

A regression analysis was performed to investigate the mutual-influence law among the five influencing factors. The five influencing factors were determined as five independent variables in the regression analysis. The values of five independent variables were determined through the results of cyclic triaxial tests. Equation (2) shows the relationship between CRR30 and fs, fcs, fc, fird, and fcsr:

$$\begin{aligned} Y & =0.125 \times {10^{ - 4}} \times X_{1}^{{ - 0.217}} \times X_{2}^{{0.073}}( - 0.051 \times {X_3}+1.89) \\ & \quad \times (0.043 \times X_{4}^{2} - 0.893 \times {X_4}+7.83) \\ & \quad \times ( - 0.586 \times X_{5}^{2}+74.29 \times {X_5}+2363.895), \\ \end{aligned}$$
(2)

where Y is CRR30. X1, X2, X3, X4, and X5 are fcs (kPa), fcsr, fs (%), fc (%), and fird (%), respectively.

The test results and regression model are shown in Fig. 7a. The regression model estimated the relationship between the variables and CRR30. Most of the data of the regression model were within ± 10% of the test results (Fig. 7b). The root mean square was R2 = 0.883. The regression model was used to represent the complex relationship between the five independent variables and CRR30.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Results of tests and regression

3D response surface plots (Fig. 8) were introduced to illustrate the relationship between CRR30 and experimental variables. These plots presented the functional response of two factors and maintained other variables constant at their middle value. As shown in Fig. 8a, a large CRR30 was yielded when fs was 0–3% and fc was 3–6%. CRR30 gradually decreased with the increase of fs and fc. CRR30 increased with the increase of fc when fc achieved the threshold value (approximately 12%). The effects of fs and fird on CRR30 are shown in Fig. 8b. A large CRR30 was obtained when fs was 0–3% and fc was 50–80%. The relationship of fs and fcs with CRR30 is shown in Fig. 8c. CRR30 gradually increased with the decrease of fs and fcs. CRR30 sharply increased when fs was 0–3% and fcs was 50–100 kPa. The relationship of fs and fcs on CRR30 was represented as a plane curve (Fig. 8d). fs and fcs had monotonic influences on CRR30. The effect of fc and fird on CRR30 was denoted as a saddled shape (Fig. 8e). A large CRR30 was obtained when fc was 3–5% and fird was 60–70 kPa, which was similar to the effect of fc and fcsr on CRR30 (Fig. 8g) at fcsr. A larger CRR30 was obtained when fc was 3–5% and fcs was 50–100 kPa (Fig. 8f). CRR30 gradually increased with the decrease of fird and fcs and reached a large value at approximately 60% and 50 kPa (Fig. 8h). The relationship of fird and fcsr on CRR30 is shown in Fig. 8i. CRR30 gradually increased with the decrease of fird and increase of fcs and achieved a large value at approximately 60% and 2.

Fig. 8
figure 8figure 8

Response surface plots for the effect of different parameters on CRR30

Numerical experiment

On the basis of laboratory experiments, numerical models were developed for numerical experiments to analyze the dynamic response and liquefaction mechanism of dredged silty-FS. PFC was employed to simulate the liquefaction behavior from a micro-scale after calibration using the laboratory experiments. The laboratory experiments were reproduced and extended to investigate other working conditions that were not performed in the physical experiments. The microscopic internal fabric changes of dredged silty-FS and extended influencing factors for liquefaction that were not considered in the physical experiments were investigated. Meanwhile, combined countermeasures to improve liquefaction resistance were simulated and verified using the calibrated numerical models.

PFC model

Dredged silty-FS belong to granular materials, and the characteristics and contact model for particles must be properly considered in a numerical modeling. PFC 3D (PFC3D) developed by Itasca was applied in this study to employ the linear contact model for simulating the mechanical behavior of particles. PFC3D was able to simulate complex loading tests that were difficult to conduct experimentally and enabled the access to information at the particle level. The microscopic behavior at particle scale was investigated.

Numerical servo-mechanism of confined pressure.

In the consolidated simulation, the top and bottom walls of the specimen were used to simulate the loading face, and the surrounding walls were used to simulate the surrounding pressure. The top and bottom faces exerted a load on the specimen under certain velocity. The lateral velocity of surrounding walls was adjusted to exert a constant confined pressure on the specimen. A numerical servo-mechanism was adopted to automatically control the velocity of surrounding walls.

The velocity of surrounding wall is expressed as

$${\dot {\mu }^{(\omega )}}=G\left( {{\sigma _{\text{m}}} - {\sigma _{\text{t}}}} \right)=G\Delta \sigma ,$$
(3)

where G is the coefficient to determine the velocity of the surrounding wall, σm is the monitored confined pressure (kPa), and σt is the exerted confined pressure (kPa).

In one calculation time step, the maximum force increment induced by wall movement is expressed as

$$\Delta {F^{(\omega )}}=k_{{\text{n}}}^{{^{{(\omega )}}}}{N_{\text{c}}}{\dot {\mu }^{(\omega )}}\Delta t,$$
(4)

where Nc is the contact number of particles with the wall, and \(k_{{\text{n}}}^{\omega }\) is the average contact stiffness (kN/m).

The average increment of force on the walls is expressed as

$$\Delta {\sigma ^{(\omega )}}=\frac{{k_{{\text{n}}}^{{(\omega )}}{N_{\text{c}}}{{\dot {\mu }}^{(\omega )}}\Delta t}}{A},$$
(5)

where A is the area of the walls (m2).

To maintain the stability of calculation, the absolute value of wall stress variation must be less than the absolute value on the difference between the pre-exerting wall and actual stresses. Safe coefficient α is introduced to maintain the stability

$$\Delta {\sigma ^{(\omega )}}<\alpha \left| {\Delta \sigma } \right|.$$
(6)

Equations (2) and (3) are substituted to Eq. (4) to obtain

$$\frac{{k_{{\text{n}}}^{{(\omega )}}{N_{\text{C}}}G\left| {\Delta \sigma } \right|\Delta t}}{A}<\alpha \left| {\Delta \sigma } \right|.$$
(7)

G can be obtained through Eq. (5)

$$G=\frac{{\alpha A}}{{k_{{\text{n}}}^{\omega }{N_{\text{C}}}\Delta t,}}$$
(8)

here α was adopted as 0.5.

Sinusoidal cyclic load

A sub-program of FISH language was developed to simulate the sinusoidal load. The sinusoidal load was realized using the numerical servo-mechanism. The sinusoidal load was transferred to velocity and exerted on the surrounding walls. The velocity was adjusted in real time by comparing the stress errors.

Pore pressure

The undrained condition was realized by constant volume conditions during the loading course. We suppose the initial height of the specimen was h and the initial diameter was r. The velocity of the top and bottom walls was vz, and the velocity of the surrounding wall was vr during the loading procedure. The volumetric strain is expressed as

$${\varepsilon _{\text{v}}}={\varepsilon _{\text{z}}}+{\varepsilon _{\text{r}}},$$
(9)

where εv = 0,

$${v_{\text{r}}}=\frac{{ - \left( {(r\sqrt {h(h - 2{v_{\text{z}}}t)} - hr+2r{v_{\text{z}}}t} \right)}}{{ - 2{v_{\text{z}}}{t^2}+ht}}.$$
(10)

Under constant volume condition, the variation of pore pressure induced by cyclic loading was obtained by monitoring the variation of effective stress on the surrounding wall

$$u={\sigma ^{\prime}_{30}} - {\sigma ^{\prime}_3},$$
(11)

where \({\sigma ^{\prime}_{30}}\) is the initial effective lateral confining pressure (kPa), and \({\sigma ^{\prime}_3}\) is the effective axial stress (kPa).

Microscopic parameter calibration

A set of representative cyclic triaxial tests for dredged silty-FS was selected to calibrate the microscopic parameters based on PFC3D. The numerical triaxial specimen was 3.91 cm in diameter and 8 cm in height based on the cyclic triaxial tests. According to Zhou et al. (2009), the appropriate enlargement of average particle size did not affect the macroscopic mechanical properties of the sample when the calculated particle number exceeded 2000 based on DEM (Zhou et al. 2009). The diameter of particles ranged from 1.2 to 2.4 mm, and a uniform distribution was adopted. The total number of particles used in the simulation was 2351 (Fig. 9). A linear stiffness model was introduced to simulate the stiffness characteristics of dredged silty-FS. A trial-and-error method was employed to calibrate the microscopic parameters.

Fig. 9
figure 9

PFC numerical sample

To accurately calibrate the microscopic parameters, a sinusoidal curve with variable amplitude was used as the cyclic load of the PFC3D model (Fig. 10). Under constant volume conditions, the pore pressure was monitored by the variation of lateral effective confining pressure. The deviator stress (q′), effective mean principal stress (p′), deviator strain (ε), and excess pore pressure (u) are expressed as

Fig. 10
figure 10

Deviatoric stress curves of test and numerical simulation

$$\left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {q^{\prime}=\frac{{{{\sigma ^{\prime}}_1} - {{\sigma ^{\prime}}_3}}}{2};}&{p^{\prime}=\frac{{{{\sigma ^{\prime}}_1}+{{\sigma ^{\prime}}_3}}}{2}} \\ {\varepsilon ={\varepsilon _1} - {\varepsilon _3};}&{u={{\sigma ^{\prime}}_{30}} - {{\sigma ^{\prime}}_3}} \end{array}} \right.,$$
(12)

where \({\sigma ^{\prime}_1}\) and \({\sigma ^{\prime}_3}\) are the effective axial and lateral stresses (kPa); \({\varepsilon ^{\prime}_1}\) and \({\varepsilon ^{\prime}_3}\) are the effective axial and lateral strains, respectively; and \({\sigma ^{\prime}_{30}}\) is initial effective lateral confining pressure (kPa).

The excess pore water pressure–time curves of cyclic triaxial test and numerical simulation are shown in Fig. 11. The excess pore water pressure increased with the increase of cyclic number. The effective mean principal stress gradually decreased with the decrease of deviator stress and increase of excess pore pressure (Fig. 12). The numerical simulation results agreed well with the cyclic triaxial test (Figs. 11, 12). The microscopic parameters are calibrated in Table 2.

Fig. 11
figure 11

Excess pore water pressure curves between cyclic triaxial test and numerical simulation

Fig. 12
figure 12

p′ − q′ curves of cyclic triaxial test and numerical simulation

Table 2 Model parameters used in PFC simulations

Internal fabric change in the liquefaction process

The PFC3D numerical simulation obtained the macroscopic response of liquefaction and also the internal fabric changes on liquefaction. The average contact force (X-, Y-, and Z-directions) and coordination number were monitored to investigate the internal fabric changes in the liquefaction process. The average contact force in the X-, Y-, and Z-directions and excess pore water pressure curves based on the numerical model are shown in Fig. 13. The average contact force in the X and Y directions linearly decreased with the increase of excess pore water pressure. However, the average contact force cyclically decreased in the Z-direction that was similar to deviator stress. The average contact force in the X-, Y-, and Z-directions decreased to 0 kPa when the excess pore water pressure increased to the initial effective lateral confining stress (100 kPa), which implied that the initial liquefaction condition was achieved.

Fig. 13
figure 13

Excess pore water pressure-average contact force curves of numerical simulation

N′ was defined as the cyclic times when initial liquefaction was achieved. The cyclic vibration times (N/N′)-coordination number curve is shown in Fig. 14. The coordination number slightly decreased at the start (N/N′ < 0.15) and was kept steady. The coordination number rapidly diminished to 2.75 when N/N′ > 0.6. Simultaneously, the excess pore water pressure increased to 100 kPa. The particles were in suspension state and local macroscopic liquefaction occurred when the average contact force decreased to 0 kPa, which was also indicated by contact force chain between the particles of the numerical sample. The change of contact force chain between the particles before and after liquefaction is shown in Fig. 15. The contact force chain intensely dropped after liquefaction.

Fig. 14
figure 14

Coordination number and N/N′ curve

Fig. 15
figure 15

Contact force chain between the particles of numerical sample

Influences of D 50 and vibration frequency based on PFC

D50 and vibration frequency were not considered in the cyclic triaxial tests. However, their influence on CSR was discussed based on the numerical models. The microscopic parameters of dredged silty-FS and the influences of D50 (0.35, 0.65, 0.75, and 0.85 mm) and vibration frequency (1, 2, 3, and 4 Hz) on liquefaction were investigated using numerical tests to compensate for insufficient experiments. The consolidation stress was 100 kPa. All of the numerical models followed a uniform distribution. The linear contact model was adopted for all particles from the start of generation.

The effect of different D50 on CSR is shown in Fig. 16. CSR increased with the increase of D50. CSR slowly increased when D50 > 0.75 mm. CSR increased by 86% when D50 increased from 0.35 to 0.65 mm. CSR increased by 4.7% when D50 increased from 0.75 to 0.85 mm. This finding was similar to the test results that for any two differently graded grains of sand, the grains that had a smaller D50 were more susceptible to liquefaction (Yilmaz and Mollamahmutoglu 2009). On this basis, the possibility of dredged silty-FS liquefaction was effectively reduced by increasing D50 appropriately.

Fig. 16
figure 16

CSR and N curve of different D50

Yoshimi and Oh-oka (1975) and Lee and Focht (1975) confirmed that the vibration frequency had small influence on liquefaction strength in generation seismic frequency range. The result was verified by Zhang and Wang (1990) with vibration frequency from 1 to 20 Hz. However, Guo and He (2009) observed that the CSR of saturated loose and dense sands increased with the increase of vibration frequency. In this study, nearly no change was observed in CSR when the vibration frequency was between 1 and 2 Hz. CSR slightly increased with the increase of vibration frequency from 2 to 4 Hz (Fig. 17). CSR increased by approximately 8% when the frequency increased at a step of 1 Hz. The effect of a wide frequency on liquefaction should be investigated.

Fig. 17
figure 17

CSR and N curve of different loading frequencies

Combined countermeasures for improving liquefaction resistance

According to Zhou et al. (2011) and Yang et al. (2012), liquefaction resistance and pore water pressure of saturated sands were significantly influenced by silty interlayer under cyclic loading. To investigate the effect of different layer combinations, FS, CS, FS–CS combination, and CS–FS–CS combination models were established to investigate the liquefaction resistance of the combined layers. The particle radii of FS and CS were 0.2–0.5 and 0.5–0.8 mm in the numerical models, respectively. The numerical models are presented in Fig. 18. The effect of different layer combinations on CSR with the number of cycles N required to reach the liquefaction is shown in Fig. 19. The CS layer had the largest CSR, and the FS layer was the most susceptible to liquefaction. The CS–FS and CS–FS–CS combination layers showed greater CSR than the FS layer. Therefore, the liquefaction resistance of dredged silty-FS was improved by properly combining FS and CS during the dredging course of land reclamation.

Fig. 18
figure 18

Numerical models of layer combinations (orange represents FS, and blue represents CS)

Fig. 19
figure 19

CSR and N curve of different layer combinations

Conclusions

In this study, cyclic triaxial tests and PFC simulations were performed to investigate the influencing factors and microscopic mechanism of liquefaction for dredged silty-FS. The conclusions are as follows:

  1. 1.

    On the basis of cyclic tests, CSR decreased with the increase of fs from 0 to 18% and sharply decreased by approximately 22% when fs value was greater than 6%. CSR first decreased with the increase of fc up to a threshold value of 12% and increased with the increase of fc. CSR increased with the increase of fird from 52 to 92% and fcsr from 1 to 2 and decreased with the increase of fcs from 50 to 300 kPa.

  2. 2.

    The effects of fird and fcsr on CRR30 were positive, and the effects of fs and fcs on CRR30 were negative. CRR30 first decreased and reached a minimum at a threshold clay content of approximately fc = 12% and increased with the increase of fc. The effect of single factor on CRR30 was sorted as fs > fcs > fc and fird > fcsr.

  3. 3.

    The regression model was proposed to represent the effects of fs, fcs, fc, fird, and fcsr on CRR30, and response surface methodology was employed to analyze the mutual influence among five independent variables.

  4. 4.

    Internal fabric changes in liquefaction were simulated using PFC. The average microscopic contact force and coordination number between the particles controlled the macroscopic mechanical behavior of sands. Sand liquefaction was due to the cumulative loss of coordination number under cyclic loading.

  5. 5.

    On the basis of numerical tests, CSR increased with the increase of D50 and vibration frequency. The influence of vibration frequency was relatively small. In addition, the CS–FS and CS–FS–CS combination layers showed greater liquefaction resistance than the FS layer. In the filling process, the interbed of FS and CS improved the liquefaction resistance of dredged silty-FS to a certain extent.