Abstract
Ecological restoration, which aims to restore disturbed ecosystems, has been an important approach to mitigate human pressures on natural ecosystems and to improve ecosystem services. Determination of the vegetation carbon effect requires the assessment of ecological restoration measures. In this study, the temporal-spatial characteristics of vegetation carbon services were analyzed using remote sensing data and weather parameters by using geographic information system in northwest Guangxi, China, a typical karst area covered by the ongoing China’s Grain-to-Green Program and eco-environment immigration during 2000–2010. The results showed that ecosystem services of vegetation carbon sequestration showed an upward trend during the 11 years; approximately 21.14 and 18.09 % of the karst area showed significant changes in the net primary productivity (NPP) and net ecosystem productivity (NEP; P < 0.05), respectively. With regard to spatial distribution, NPP and NEP were higher for the western non-karst areas, and the greatest increase in these parameters was recorded in the eastern part of the restoration area of karst rocky desertification. Vegetation carbon sequestration was significantly affected by the impacts of vegetation coverage, vegetation species, and forest type. The results of this study suggested that rocky desertification control measures have positive impacts on the spatial distribution of vegetation carbon services in the typical karst area of northwest Guangxi, China.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Carbon cycle is a link among major global change issues, because it is a complex process of material circulation and energy flow in the earth system (Bolin et al. 1977; Tian et al. 1998; Pan et al. 2011). The climate convention held in Kyoto Protocol and the Copenhagen conference has made the issue of carbon reduction and performance to have a far-reaching impact on the economic and political decisions worldwide (Wang et al. 2012). Vegetation carbon, an important component of the carbon cycle, plays an important role in carbon balance, because it is one of the important factors that determine the ecosystem carbon source/sink and regulate ecological processes (Dixon et al. 1994; Manzoni et al. 2011).
Ecological restoration, which aims to restore disturbed ecosystems, has been an important approach to mitigate human pressures on natural ecosystems and to improve ecosystem services (Holl et al. 2003; Doren et al. 2009; Feng et al. 2013). China’s grain-to-green program (GTGP) is one such national ecological restoration program. For instance, the GTGP has helped re-establish semi-natural vegetation on previously cultivated slopes (14.7 million hectares) and abandoned agricultural lands (17.3 million hectares; Chen et al. 2009). This continuous increase in vegetation cover is expected to change ecosystem services, including the potential to sequester greenhouse gases. Furthermore, the effectiveness of ecological restoration as well as the consequence of carbon sequestration can be highly variable across climatic gradients (Piao et al. 2009; Valentini et al. 2000). Therefore, assessing the spatial and regional variances in ecosystem services caused by large-scale restoration programs is important. Such information is particularly important for adjusting current and planning for future restoration programs in a more effective and efficient way.
Numerous studies have assessed various aspects of ecosystem services (Daily 1997; Chazdon 2008; Li et al. 2008; Bergstrom et al. 2009; Brown et al. 2011) by using different methods. Their findings indicated that a local management authority can establish guidelines to limit human activities associated with landscape changes. Further, the management of study areas as a part of a network of natural parks seemed to be an effective measure for maintaining the natural capital flow. However, these studies have mainly focused on forests, wetlands, and grasslands; studies on karst areas are limited (Wu et al. 2008; Zhang et al. 2011; Richards et al. 2012; Thevs et al. 2013). Karst regions account for about 15 % of land area globally (about 2.2 million km2) and house approximately 1 billion people (17 % of the world’s population; Yuan and Cai 1988). These areas are the most fragile systems (Parise et al. 2008) and are characterized by poor soil formation ability, thin soil depth (generally below 10 cm), and poor surface water retention (i.e., infiltration coefficient of 0.3–0.6; Yuan and Cai 1988). Therefore, the recovery of degraded karst ecosystems is slow and difficult.
One of the most harmful consequences of ecosystem degradation in karst regions is rocky desertification—development of a desert-like landscape with high percentage of bedrock due to severe human disturbances (Yuan 1993). Since the bedrock is widely exposed, land productivity declines and cropland distribution becomes more scattered, which is an important index of environmental capacity for humans. Therefore, the karst region in southwest China has been severely affected by poverty and environmental degradation (Cai 1996; Cao et al. 2008). This situation has been addressed by applying countermeasures, including GTGP and environmental (ecological) migration, to alleviate poverty and control rocky desertification (Zhang et al. 2011). However, the efficiency of these ecological projects on the karst ecosystem services has not yet been investigated.
This study aimed to quantitatively evaluate the efficiency of GTGP in improving carbon sequestration. This evaluation has been speculated to assist in ecosystem management to achieve sustainable development in fragile environments. The ecosystem carbon sequestration in the typical karst area of northwest Guangxi, China, a prioritized pilot region covered by the ongoing GTGP, was investigated between 2000 and 2010. Satellite data, climate data, and ecosystem modeling data were used to determine the changes in net primary productivity (NPP) and net ecosystem productivity (NEP) in this region since the implementation of GTGP. Finally, the correlation of vegetation carbon with environmental factors was assessed using canonical correspondence analysis (CCA; TerBraak 1986) to obtain some useful information for policy makers to effectively plan ecological restoration.
Materials and methods
Study area
The study region of northwest Guangxi, China, includes 16 counties that cover an area of 50,700 km2 (104°29′–109°09′E, 23°33′–25°37′N; Fig. 1). The region has a subtropical wet climate, with annual mean temperature and precipitation of 19.5 °C and about 1000 mm, respectively. The elevation in this hilly region varies from 100 to 2000 m. Vegetation communities mainly include mixed subtropical evergreen and deciduous forests. There are all kinds of karst landforms in this region, such as towers, poljes, cockpits, and dolines. There is mountainous agricultural region with infertile cropland due to the influence of geological conditions; the ratio of high productivity is only 53.58 %, which is mainly found in flat areas located in closed depressions that have major settlements. Therefore, conflicts always exist between agricultural development and ecosystem conservation.
Data description
Enhanced thematic mapper plus (ETM+) imaging (7 bands, with a resolution of 30 m × 30 m) and a digital elevation model (DEM, with a resolution of 100 m × 100 m) were selected; they were provided by the Data-sharing Network of Earth System Science, China (http://www.geodata.cn). The daily meteorological data (solar radiation, temperature, and precipitation) for 2000–2010 were obtained from 97 stations within and near the study area of northwest Guangxi, China, from the China Meteorological Data-sharing Service System (cdc.cma.gov.cn). They were interpolated to 100-m resolution on a 100-m resolution digital elevation model layer by using the thin-plate smoothing spline method. Carbon sequestration rates were calculated on a monthly basis.
Vegetation type was extracted from the ETM+ images by using ArcGIS 10.0 (Environment Systems Research Institute) and ERDAS IMAGINE 9.1 software (Leica) by using the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI). The classifications were validated using the color infrared aerial photographs and in situ data collected during 2000–2010. The accuracies of the classifications were 80.54 %, with Kappa coefficients of 0.63. In addition, meteorological data (solar radiation, temperature, and precipitation) for 2000–2010 were obtained from 97 stations within and near this study area and interpolated to a 250-m resolution by using the thin-plate smoothing spline method. All data were projected to the same level (Albers Conical Equal Area, Krasovsky Spheroid) and sampled to the same pixel spacing (250 m × 250 m).
Estimating NPP from the remotely sensed data
The terrestrial Carnegie–Ames–Stanford Approach (CASA) ecosystem model was used to estimate ecosystem NPP from satellite data (Field et al. 1995; Zhu et al. 2006; Xing et al. 2010). The following models were used to calculate NPP:
where ε(x,t) is light energy utilization, and APAR(x,t) is absorbed photosynthesis availability radiation.
where FPAR(x,t) is the fraction of photosynthesis active radiation, and SOL(x, t) is solar radiation.
where T ε1 (x,t) is the effect of temperature, and W ε (x,t) is the effect of water on light energy utilization. ε max is the maximum light energy utilization, using the eco-physiological process model (BIOME-BGC) as revealed by Running and Coughlan (1988).
where T opt(x,t) is the mean annual temperature.
where E(x, t), E ρ (x, t), p(x, t), and R n(x, t) are the actual evapotranspiration, potential evapotranspiration, rainfall, and radiation, respectively. E ρ0(x,t) is the local available evapotranspiration, which is calculated using the vegetation-climate model of Thomthwaite (1948).
Estimating NEP from NPP and environmental conditions
In an ecosystem, when the fixed carbon is more than the discharged carbon, the ecosystem becomes a sink of atmospheric CO2 (carbon sequestration). NEP is one of the most important indexes to identify the carbon source (sink). Vegetation carbon sequestration can be expressed as the difference between vegetation NPP and soil microbial respiration carbon (RH) emissions (Zhao et al. 2005; Pei et al. 2010).
where T is temperature, and R is precipitation. When NEP > 0, the carbon of vegetation fixed is more than that of soil discharged (Fang et al. 2007; Tang et al. 2013).
Factors influencing the spatial distributions of vegetation carbon density determined using CCA
CCA is a robust method that has been widely used in ecology and can be used to directly relate community data to environmental variables by constraining species ordination to a pattern correlated with environmental variables. It allows the measurement of the linear relationship between two multidimensional variables and can be used to evaluate the relationship between two group variables (TerBraak 1994).
In this analysis, vegetation carbon is treated as samples, and environmental variables such as land type (LT), forest type (FT), vegetation species (VS), vegetation type (VT), degree of rocky desertification (DR), humus layer (HL), area grad, vegetation coverage (VC), soil thickness (ST), slope position (SP), slope (S), aspect (AS), and altitude are treated as environmental factors. CCA was performed using CANOCO for Windows (TerBraak 1994). All variables were standardized using SPSS 11.0 (International Business Machines Corporation, IBM) before applying CCA.
Results
Annual NPP increased in the typical karst area of northwest Guangxi, China, since the implementation of the GTGP
First, the changes in annual NPP, which showed an increasing trend during 2000–2010, over the typical karst area were investigated. The total annual NPP increased from 191.66 Tg C in 2000 to 201.08 Tg C in 2010 with a significance rate of 13.20 g C m−2 year−1 (P < 0.05). Annual NPP also significantly increased (P < 0.05) by 21.14 % in the study area, with the mean annual NPP accumulation rate of 58.00 g C m−2 year−1 (Fig. 2a). The study area can be divided into five zones according to the geographical condition and intensity of human disturbance: zone 1 (NKW, western non-karst area), zone 2 (NKE, eastern non-karst area), zone 3 (KW, western karst area), zone 4 (RDC, restoration area of karst rocky desertification), and zone 5 (RD, area of karst rocky desertification; Fig. 1). The annual NPP increased during 2000–2010 in all the five zones. The greatest increase was found in zone 4 (34.20 g C m−2 year−1, P < 0.05), followed by those in zone 2 (23.90 g C m−2 year−1, P < 0.05), zone 3 (5.30 g C m−2 year−1, P < 0.05), and zone 5 (2.40 g C m−2 year−1, P < 0.05). The change was slight in zone 1 (1.7 0 g C m−2 year−1; Fig. 2).
Increased annual NEP in the typical karst area during 2000–2010
NEP of the typical karst area also significantly increased from 179.58 Tg C in 2000 to a carbon sink of 182.54 Tg C in 2010, with a rate of 9.00 g C m−2 year−1 (P < 0.05). Zones 1–5 functioned as net carbon sinks in 2010, with an annual NEP of 10.94 Tg C (36.43 % of the total annual NEP), 4.12 Tg C (4.12 %), 3.36 Tg C (11.19 %), 8.73 Tg C (29.06 %), and 5.77 Tg C (19.19 %), respectively (Fig. 3). NEP also tended to significantly increase in each zone during 2000–2010. Zone 4 (RDC) showed the highest annual NEP (30.30 g C m−2 year−1, P < 0.05), followed by zone 2 (19.70 g C m−2 year−1, P < 0.05), zone 3 (0.90 g C m−2 year−1, P < 0.05), zone 5 (−1.60 g C m−2 year−1, P < 0.05), and zone 1 (−2.70 g C m−2 year−1, P < 0.05; Fig. 3).
Carbon sequestration increased mostly due to the implementation of the ecological restoration program
Besides the improvements afforded by the implementation of the GTGP, changes in climate might have also contributed to the significant ecosystem carbon sequestration in the typical karst area. Thus, the changes in annual precipitation and mean annual temperature over 2000–2010 were also assessed. However, there was no significant change in precipitation or temperature in either the entire region or any of the separate zones (Fig. 4). Statistical analysis also showed no significant correlations between NPP or NEP and the climate variables (P = 0.45). Hence, the observed significant increases in NPP and NEP in the study area were unlikely to have been caused by climate changes. Correlation analysis of each pixel variation showed that the changes in NPP were less affected by those in precipitation and temperature (P > 0.05; Fig. 5) . The changes in NPP were positively correlated with the changes in precipitation and negatively correlated with those in temperature (Fig. 5), whereas regions where the GTGP was implemented showed a significant increase in annual NPP (compare Figs. 1, 2). These results suggested that the increased annual NPP and net ecosystem sequestration in the typical karst area during the study period were mostly due to the implemented ecological restoration program.
Although the changes in climate might not be responsible for the significantly increased NPP in the study area, the carbon sequestration efficiency of the GTGP was still limited by precipitation. Precipitation can have a direct effect on plant characteristics such as size, plant structure, and plant density of the restored vegetation. Grass, shrubs, and forests showed the highest trends of NPP and NEP increase for zones 1 and 3, zone 2, and zones 4 and 5, respectively (Table 1). There was also a certain correlation between the NPP and NEP of different vegetation types, especially between forests and shrubs. Forests and shrubs might thus have associated characteristics. Human activities affected carbon sequestration by alternating land use change and could play either positive or negative roles in generating stressors. Population growth and agriculture generated stressors, whereas ecosystem restoration programs intended to reduce stressors, but these programs feedback to human activities. These results suggest that appropriate restoration programs should be implemented in accordance with the local climate of regions in order to achieve the best efficiency.
Vegetation carbon density is closely related with human activity
The results of CCA are shown in figures as t horizontal, vertical axes, and some vectors. The angle of the vector and axis indicated the size of correlation (smaller the angle size, larger the power of correlation). The length of the vector indicated the strength of environmental impacts, and its direction and axis express a positive or negative correlation.
There were significant correlations between vegetation carbon and environmental factors. The correlation coefficients of the first and second axes of the vegetation carbon matrix and that of environmental factor matrix were 0.915 and 0.868, respectively. This suggested that most correlation information was located in the first two axes, and various line segments emerged in the graph. The length of the line segments and the angle between them and the axes represented the relationship between environmental factors and vegetation carbon (the longer the line, the stronger is the influence).
Axis 1 was closely correlated with AG, HL, ST, VC, VS, and FT. The first axis increased with all the six factors. The second axis increased with SP and AS. DR increased when axis 1 increased (Fig. 6). High elevation and slope were found in the upper part of the ordination. Vegetation carbon was closely related with AG, HL, ST, VC, VS, and FT. High vegetation carbon was mainly found in areas with fertile soil and high vegetation coverage. Vegetation carbon was highly correlated with slope and elevation, and higher carbon was typically found at higher slope and elevation positions (the average NPP was 380.59 g C m−2 below the elevation of 200 m and 406.40 g C m−2 above the elevation of 1000 m in the study area between 2000 and 2010). There was generally good vegetation coverage at high elevation because of little disturbance by human activities, especially by the implementation of hill closing for forestation. At low elevations, such correlations were not found due to the strong rocky desertification.
Discussion and conclusions
Our results showed a significantly increasing trend in ecosystem carbon sequestration in the typical fragile karst area of northwest Guangxi, China (13.20 g C m−2 year−1 on average) since the implementation of the GTGP, which resulted in the fixation of 2.96 Tg C in this land. Because of the widely distributed rocky desertification, the density of vegetation carbon in the study area was relatively low compared with that in the other areas. Regarding the distribution of the NEP in different zones, zone 1 had high and zone 4 had relatively low contribution, although the increase in NEP in zone 4 was significant and that in zone 1 was slight. Moreover, the CCA analysis showed that the most significant factors that influenced vegetation carbon in the study area were AG, HL, ST, VC, VS, and FT. Our study results indicated that karst ecosystem had improved because of the rocky desertification control measures, including ecological migration, and the GTGP. About 0.53 % of the total area covered by the GTGP was restored in this typical karst area. Therefore, the GTGP substantially contributed to the mitigation of China’s anthropogenic CO2 emission.
Unlike in other study areas (Tian et al. 1998; Piao et al. 2009; Pan et al. 2011; Harris et al. 2012; Feng et al. 2013), the per unit area NEP in the present study area was fairly high primarily because of the higher temperature, ample precipitation, and dominant mixed forests. The ecosystem conditions improved with the implementation of measures to overcome rocky desertification during 2000–2010 (Yang 2003). The focus of environmental migration is to help people move to places with better ecosystem conditions, and 49,133 families (232,705 persons) were relocated in northwest Guangxi, China. The total area of GTGP was up to 1278.67 km2 in Baise, which included farmland to forest (605.33 km2) and barren hills to reforestation (673.33 km2).
Results of the CCA showed that the impact of VC, VS, and FT on vegetation carbon was significant and positive. The results indicated that environmental migration and GTGP were the main impact factors on land use changes, and thus landscape pattern modifications, leading to the changes in NEP. Controlling karst rocky desertification requires the optimization of land use structure.
Obtaining a balance between development and protection is a common problem and is also noted in rocky desertification in karst areas (Brown et al. 2011). The environmental quality is known to be poor in karst areas. Therefore, conservation of karst ecosystem should take precedence over economic purposes in future land use. Although discontinuing all reclamation activities in the karst areas might not be possible, future land reclamation projects need to be controlled and should be implemented after rigorous environmental impact analysis. Therefore, more studies investigating the impacts on ecosystem services are necessary in the karst region of southwest China.
This study analyzed the spatiotemporal variations in vegetation carbon in the typical karst area of northwest Guangxi, China, based on previously reported findings and field verification. However, the estimated results were not completely consistent with the actual carbon density due to the complexity and dynamics of the ecosystems themselves (Costanza 2008; Li et al. 2010; Zhao et al. 2010; Ngugi et al. 2011) and the problems in identifying appropriate scales (Bengtsson et al. 2005; Hein et al. 2006; Petrosillo et al. 2009). Consequently, the multi-scale and spatial analyses of vegetation carbon are necessary in the future. Unlike most other ecosystems, the karst ecosystem is fragile and heterogeneous. Therefore, the spatial scale and image resolution need to be taken into account in future assessments of ecosystem services in this or similar karst regions.
Our analysis showed that the current increase in NEP was mainly because of enhanced NPP, and that environmental conditions such as precipitation and temperature had insignificant contributions. This is because of the fact that human activities have a remarkable impact on NPP. The present results also revealed the rates of different restoration types that are required to increase the annual NPP across different zones. In terms of carbon sequestration potential, the present results showed that there is no universally best restoration for all zones. In conclusion, the vegetation restoration in the typical karst area of northwest Guangxi, China, is especially limited by the intensity of human activities.
References
Bengtsson J, Ahnstrom J, Weibull AC (2005) The effects of organic agriculture on biodiversity and abundance: a meta-analysis. J Appl Ecol 42:261–269
Bergstrom DM, Lucieer A, Kiefer K, Wasley J, Belbin L, Pedersen TK, Chown SL (2009) Indirect effects of invasive species removal devastate World Heritage Island. J Appl Ecol 46:73–81
Bolin B (1977) Change of land biota and their importance for carbon cycle. Science 196:613–616
Brown DR, Dettmann P, Rinaudo T, Tefera H, Tofu A (2011) Poverty alleviation and environmental restoration using the clean development mechanism: a case study from Humbo, Ethiopia. Environ Manage 48:322–333
Cai Y (1996) Preliminary research on ecological reconstruction in karst mountain poverty areas of Southwest China. Adv Earth Sci 11:602–606
Cao JH, Jiang ZC, Yang DS, Pei JG, Yang H, Luo WQ (2008) Grading of soil erosion intensity in Southwest karst area of China. Sci Soil Water Conserv 6:1–7 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Chazdon RL (2008) Beyond deforestation: restoring forests and ecosystem services on degraded lands. Science 320:1458–1460
Chen XG, Zhang XQ, Zhang YP, Wan CB (2009) Carbon sequestration potential of the stands under the Grain for Green Program in Yunnan Province, China. For Ecol Manage 258:199–206
Costanza R (2008) Ecosystem Services: multiple classification systems are needed. Biol Conserv 141:350–352
Daily GC (1997) Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island Press, Washington DC
Dixon RK, Brown S, Houghton RA, Solomon AM, Trexler MC, Wisniewski J (1994) Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems. Science 263:185–190
Doren RF, Trexler JC, Gottlieb AD, Harwell MC (2009) Ecological indicators for system-wide assessment of the greater everglades ecosystem restoration program. Ecol Ind 9:2–16
Fang JY, Guo ZD, Piao SL, Chen AP (2007) Terrestrial vegetation carbon sinks in China, 1981–2000. Sci China Series D Earth Sci 37:804–812 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Feng XM, Fu BJ, Lu N, Zeng Y, Wu BF (2013) How ecological restoration alters ecosystem services: an analysis of carbon sequestration in China’s Loess Plateau. Sci Report 3:1–5
Field CB, Randerson JT, Malmstrom CM (1995) Global net primary production: combining ecology and remote sensing. Remote Sens Environ 51:74–88
Harris NL, Brown S, Hagen SC, Saatchi SS, Petrova S, Salas W, Hansen MC, Potapov PV, Lotsch A (2012) Baseline map of carbon emissions from deforestation in tropical regions. Science 336:1573–1576
Hein L, Koppen KV, Groot RSD, Lerland ECV (2006) Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 57:209–228
Holl KD, Crone EE, Schultz CB (2003) Landscape restoration: moving from generalities to methodologies. Bioscience 53:491–502
Li WK, Li TH, Qian ZH (2008) Impact of land use change on ecosystem service values in Shenzhen. J Nat Res 23:440–446
Li CB, Qi JG, Feng ZD, Yin RS, Guo BY, Zhang F, Zou SB (2010) Quantifying the effect of ecological restoration on soil erosion in China’s Loess Plateau region: an application of the MMF approach. Environ Manage 45:476–487
Manzoni S, Katul G, Fay PA, Polley HW, Porporatoa A (2011) Modeling the vegetation–atmosphere carbon dioxide and water vapor interactions along a controlled CO2 gradient. Ecol Model 222:653–665
Ngugi MR, Johnson RW, McDonald WJF (2011) Restoration of ecosystems for biodiversity and carbon sequestration: simulating growth dynamics of brigalow vegetation communities in Australia. Ecol Model 222:785–794
Pan Y, Birdsey RA, Fang JY, Houghton R, Kauppi PE, Kurz WA, Phillips OL, Shvidenko A, Lewis SL, Canadell JG, Ciais P, Jackson RB, Pacala SW, Mcguire AD, Piao SL, Rautiainen A, Sitch S, Hayes D (2011) A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science 333:988–993
Parise M, Waele JD, Gutierrez F (2008) Engineering and environmental problems in Karst—an introduction. Eng Geol 99:91–94
Pei ZY, Zhou CP, Ouyang H, Yang WB (2010) A carbon budget of alpine steppe area in the Tibetan Plateau. Geogr Res 29:102–110 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Petrosillo I, Zaccarelli N, Semeraro T, Zurlini G (2009) The effectiveness of different conservation policies on the security of natural capital. Landsc Urban Plan 89:49–56
Piao SL, Fang JY, Ciais P, Peylin P, Huang Y, Sitch S, Wang T (2009) The Carbon balance of terrestrial ecosystems in China. Nature 458:1009–1013
Richards WH, Koeck R, Gersonde R (2012) Landscape-scale forest management in the municipal watersheds of Vienna, Austria, and Seattle, USA: commonalities despite disparate ecology and history. Nat Areas J 32:199–207
Running SW, Coughlan JC (1988) A general model of ecosystem processes for regional applications 1: hydrologic balance, canopy gas exchange and primary production processes. Ecol model 42:125–154
Tang J, Jiang Y, Li ZY, Zhang N, Hu M (2013) Estimation of vegetation net primary productivity and carbon sink in western Jilin province based on CASA model. J Arid Land Resour Environ 27:1–7 (in Chinese with English abstract)
TerBraak CJF (1986) Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient Analysis. Ecology 67:1167–1179
TerBraak CJF (1994) Canonical community ordination. Part I: basictheory and linear methods. Ecoscience 1:127–140
Thevs N, Wuchererb W, Buras A (2013) Spatial distribution and carbon stock of the Saxaul vegetation of the winter-cold deserts of Middle Asia. J Arid Environ 90:29–35
Thomthwaite CW (1948) An approach toward a rational classification of climate. Geogr Rev 38:55–94
Tian H, Melillo JM, Kicklighter DW, Mcgire AD, Helfricch JVK, Moore B, Vorosmarty CJ (1998) Effect of interannual climate variability on carbon storage in Amazonian ecosystems. Nature 396:664–667
Valentini R, Matteucc G, Dolman AJ, Schulze ED, Rebmann C, Moors EJ, Granier A, Gross P, Jensen NO, Pilegaard K, Lindroth A, Grelle A, Bernhofer C, Gruènwald T, Aubinet M, Ceulemans R, Kowalski AS, Vesala T, Rannik U, Berbigier P, Loustau D, Gumundsson J, Thorgeirsson H, Ibrom A, Morgenstern K, Clement R, Moncrieff J, Montagnani L, Minerbi S, Jarvis PG (2000) Respiration as the main determinant of carbon balance in European forests. Nature 404:861–864
Wang SL, Yeager KM, Wan GJ, Liu CQ, Wang YC, Lv YC (2012) Carbon export and HCO_3 fate in carbonate catchments: a case study in the karst plateau of southwestern China. Appl Geochem 27:64–72 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Wu KY, Jiang ZC, Deng XH (2008) Ecosystem service value of restored secondary forest in the Karstic-rocky hills—a case study of Nongla National Medicine Nature Reserve, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region. Chin J Eco-Agric 16:1011–1014 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Xing XX, Xu XL, Zhang XZ, Zhou CP, Song MH, Shao B, Ouyang H (2010) Simulating net primary production of grasslands in northeastern Asia using MODIS data from 2000 to 2005. J Geogr Sci 20:193–204 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Yang C (2003) A discussion on the remote sensing analysis of karst stoned desertization in Guangxi. Remote Sensing Land Res 56(34–36):63 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Yuan DX (1993) The Karst study of China (in Chinese). Geology Press, Beijing
Yuan DX, Cai GH (1988) The science of karst environment (in Chinese). Chongqing Science and Technology Publishing House, Chongqing
Zhang MY, Zhang CH, Wang KL, Yue YM, Qi XK, Fan FD (2011) Spatiotemporal variation of karst ecosystem service values and its correlation with environmental factors in Northwest Guangxi, China. Environ Manage 48:933–944
Zhao MS, Heinsch FA, Nemani RR (2005) Improvements of the MODIS terrestrial gross and net primary production global data set. Remote Sens Environ 95:164–176
Zhao SQ, Liu SG, Yin RS, Li ZP, Deng YL, Tan K, Deng XZ, Rothstein D, Qi JG (2010) Quantifying terrestrial ecosystem carbon dynamics in the Jinsha Watershed, Upper Yangtze, China from 1975 to 2000. Environ Manage 45:466–475
Zhu WQ, Pan YZ, He H, Yu DY, Hu HB (2006) Simulation of maximum light use efficiency for some typical vegetation types in China. Chin Sci Bull 51:457–463 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (31370484, 31470519, and 41471445), National Key Basic Research Program of China (2015CB452703), Chinese Academy of Sciences Action Plan for the Development of Western China (KZCX2-XB3-10), and the open fund of Key Laboratory of Agro-ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences (ISA2015203).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, M., Wang, K., Liu, H. et al. How ecological restoration alters ecosystem services: an analysis of vegetation carbon sequestration in the karst area of northwest Guangxi, China. Environ Earth Sci 74, 5307–5317 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4542-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4542-0