Abstract
The residue from a second-stage dry sinter plant off-gas cleaning process contains both the fine dust from the sinter plant and the sorbent used. Recycling of the material that is usually handled by landfills to the sinter plant feed is not possible because of its chloride content. Leaching of the chlorides allow the recycling of remaining solids. The saline leachate produced contains some heavy metals and must be treated before it is discharged into the sea. In laboratory experiments, leaching tests with the subsequent treatment of the leachate were conducted. After the process was optimized, all heavy-metal concentrations were below the permissible values. The optimum treatment conditions for heavy-metal precipitation were observed to be the filtration of the suspended solids followed by the dosing of liquid with lime milk (pH 10) and the subsequent precipitation using sodium sulfide.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
R. Remus, M.A. Aguado-Monsonet, S. Roudier, and L.D. Sancho, Best Available Techniques (BAT) Reference Document for Iron and Steel Production, Industrial Emissions Directive 2010/75/EU, Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2013, p. 98.
H.P. Eisen, J. Groß, K.R. Hüsig, K. Kersting, and K.H. Stedem, Reduction of dust emissions in German sinter plants, [in] Proceedings of the 3rd International Ironmaking Congress, Gent, 1996, p.165.
C. Delwig, W. Hartig, M. Hoffmann, and H.B. Lüngen, Developments in sinter technology, Stahl Eisen, 127(2007), No. 6–7, p. S51.
E. Guerriero, A. Guarnieri, S. Mosca, G. Rossetti, and M. Rotatori, PCDD/Fs removal efficiency by electrostatic precipitator and wetfine scrubber in an iron ore sintering plant, J. Hazard. Mater., 172(2009), No. 2–3, p. 1498.
N. Menad, H. Tayibi, F.G. Carcedo, and A. Hernández, Minimization methods for emissions generated from sinter strands: a review, J. Clean. Prod., 14(2006), No. 8, p. 740.
C. Lanzerstorfer, A. Fleischanderl, T. Plattner, W. Ehler, and E. Zwittag, Emissionsminderung bei Eisenerz-Sinteranlagen, VDI Berichte 2035, VDI Verlag, Düsseldorf, 2008, p. 161.
J. Leroy, E. Ravier, and A. Wajs, New abatement technique of the atmospheric emissions of large sinter plant: first results of industrial pilot in Arcelor’s Fos-sur-Mer, [in] Proceedings of Dust conference 2007, Maastricht, 2007, p. S2.
Z.J. Yu, Q.Y. Li, H.J. Xu, and C.Y. Lin, Design and Application of the Dry-FGD process in Sanming Steel No. 2 Sintering Plant, [in] K.P. Yan ed., Electrostatic Precipitation, Springer, Berlin, 2009, p. 620.
A. Fleischanderl, R. Neuhold, G. Meierhofer, and C. Lanzerstorfer, Improved dry-type gas-cleaning process for the treatment of sinter offgas, [in] Proceedings of the Iron and Steelmaking Conference, Linz, 2006, p. 1.
W. Hartig, M. Hoffmann, F. Reufer, and H. Weissert, Commissioning and first operational results of the new gas cleaning installation with the PAUL WURTH entrained flow absorber (EFA) at ROGESA No. 3 sinter plant, [in] Proceedings of the 7th International Metallurgical Technology Trade Fair with Congress, Düsseldorf, 2007, p. 322.
E. Schuster, J. Zirngast, and M. Zahn, Experiences with flue-gas cleaning by bag filter at the sinter strand of voestalpine stahl Donawitz, [in] Proceedings of the International Conference on Clean Technologies in the Steel Industry, Balatonfüred, 2005, p. 292.
J. Höltje and H.J. Korte, Verfahren zur trockenen Rauchgasreinigung für Abfallverbrennungsanlagen und andere industrielle Prozesse, VDI Berichte 1241, VDI Verlag, Düsseldorf, 1996, p. 127.
A. Fleischanderl, Improved dry-type gas-cleaning process for the treatment of sinter offgas, Metall. Plant Technol. Int., 29(2006), No. 3, p. 36.
W. Gebert, Abgasreinigungssysteme für Sinteranlagen [Dissertation], Universität Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, 1996, p.16.
S.Q. Xu, J.G. Liu, and M.Y. Song, Water-washing of iron-ore sintering gas cleaning residue for beneficial reutilization as secondary construction material, Procedia Environ. Sci., 16(2012), p. 244.
R. Beck, Natriumhaltige Reaktionsprodukte aus der Abluftreinigung lassen sich nutzen, WLB Wasser, Luft und Boden, 1999, No. 1–2, p. 59.
T.H.P. Leuwerink and A.L.J. van der Panne, Reduced emissions from Hoogovens Sinter and Pellet Plants, [in] IISI Seminar on Sinter and Pellets, Brussels, 1999, p. 176.
A. Smit, T.H.P. Leuwerink, A.L.J. van der Panne, W. Gebert, C. Lanzerstorfer, H. Riepl, and K. Hofstadler, Reduction of dioxin emission from Hoogovens Sinter Plant with the AIR-FINE® system, Organohalogen Compd., 40(1999), p. 441.
F. Fu and Q. Wang, Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater: a review, J. Environ. Manage., 92(2011), No. 3, p. 407.
M.A. Barakat, New trends in removing heavy metals from industrial wastewater, Arab. J. Chem., 4(2011), No. 4, p. 361.
DIN EN ISO 60, Kunststoffe, Bestimmung der scheinbaren Dichte von Formmassen, die durch einen genormten Trichter abfließen können (Schüttdichte), Österreichisches Normungsinstitut, Wien, 1999.
L. Charerntanyarak, Heavy metals removal by chemical coagulation and precipitation, Water Sci. Technol., 39(1999), No. 10–11, p. 135.
C.L. Beh, T.G. Chuah, M.N. Nourouzi, and T. Choong, Removal of heavy metals from steel making waste water by using electric arc furnace slag, E-J. Chem., 9(2012), No. 4, p. 2557.
B. Decostere, J. Hogie, P. Dejans, and S.W.H. Van Hulle, Removal of heavy metals occurring in the washing water of flue gas purification, Chem. Eng. J., 150(2009), No. 1, p. 196.
T. Leuwerink and A. van der Panne, Operating results of emission optimized sintering with airfine gas cleaning, Stahl Eisen, 121(2001), No. 5, p. 29.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lanzerstorfer, C., Xu, Q. & Neuhold, R. Leaching of the residue from the dry off-gas de-dusting and desulfurization process of an iron ore sinter plant. Int J Miner Metall Mater 22, 116–121 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-015-1051-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-015-1051-9