Abstract
Locked posterior dislocation of the shoulder is uncommon and frequently missed injury. It accounts for 2–4 % of all shoulder dislocations. It is commonly associated with osseous defects in humeral head articular surface known as reverse Hill-Sachs lesion. Numerous surgical procedures are invented to repair this defect with variable outcomes, but evidence-based management strategies are lacking. Among these procedures are as follows: transfer of lesser tuberosity or subscapularis tendon, rotational osteotomy of humerus, osteochondral grafts. Salvage procedure as hemiarthroplasty or total shoulder arthroplasty used in huge non-constructable defect or very old neglected dislocation. In our case series, we treated nine cases (two females) of locked posterior dislocation of the shoulder with anteromedial humeral head defects ranging between 30 and 50 % of head size. Open reduction of dislocation followed by transfer of the lesser tuberosity together with subscapularis tendon for reconstruction of the humeral head defect. The transfer was fixed with Ethibond suture size 5–0 (Ethicon, Inc. Somerville, NJ). The mean follow-up period was 14.5 months (range 12–25 months). Seven cases had no pain or restriction of activities of daily living. No patient had symptoms of instability of the shoulder. According to UCLA shoulder rating scale, there were three cases rated excellent, four cases rated good, one case rated fair, and one case rated poor. It is concluded that reconstruction of the humeral head defect provides good pain relief, stability, and function for patients with a locked posterior dislocation of the shoulder where the defect involves between 30–50 % of the articular surface circumference. Our technique is simple, cheap, and there is no need for second operation for hardware removal.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Posterior dislocations of the humeral head are rare, comprising only 2–4 % of shoulder dislocations [1, 2]. They mostly occur secondary to violent muscle contractions associated with seizures, electric shock, or (sports) trauma [3]. Half of these dislocations are associated with an impression fracture of the anteromedial aspect of the humeral head or “reverse Hill-Sachs lesion” [3, 4].
There are no evidence-based management strategies concerning the humeral head impaction, but different surgical options described such as a transfer of the subscapularis tendon or lesser tuberosity into the defect [5, 6] and rotational osteotomy of the proximal humeral head [7]. Other procedures include cancellous bone graft either autogenic or allogenic [8] and arthroplasty [9].
The purpose of this study is to report the results of open reduction and reconstruction of the humeral head defect through transfer of subscapularis tendon or lesser tuberosity, and in both conditions, we fix the transfer with size (5) Ethibond suture (Ethicon, Inc. Somerville, NJ) instead of using screws or stables for fixation. It is concluded that patients with locked posterior dislocation of the shoulder where an osseous defect involves between 30–50 % of articular surface, reconstruction of the defect provides good pain relief, range of motion, stability, and patient satisfaction.
Patients and methods
This was a prospective case series study of nine patients with neglected locked posterior dislocation of the shoulder and reverse Hill-Sachs lesion treated and followed between March 2009 and October 2012. The mean follow-up period was 18 months (range 14–25 months). There were seven males and two females, right-shoulder affected in six patients. The mean age of the patients was 29.50 (range 22–46). Six patients had been correctly diagnosed, while three patients received a program of physiotherapy owing to wrong diagnosis as frozen shoulder. The chief complaint of all patients was pain and limited external rotation. Causative trauma was fall from height in four patients, seizer due to epileptic fits in two patients, electric shock in one patient, and in two patients, the exact cause could not be detected. All patients underwent a thorough standardized physical and neurological examination before surgery. The average forward flexion was 90°, internal rotation to L5, with no external rotation. The patients kept their forearm against their chest somewhat comfortably. Preoperative anteroposterior view might be misleading (Fig. 1). Axillary or scapular views would confirm the diagnosis (Fig. 2). Preoperative CT scans were obtained for all patients, and mean humeral head defect was 40 % (range 35 %–45 %) (Figs. 3 and 4).
The characteristics of the cases are shown in Table 1.
Surgical technique
All patients had been operated-upon under general anesthesia and utilizing beach-chair position with the upper body out of the operating table allowing full extension of the arm. Deltopectoral approach was used in all cases with preservation of the cephalic vein (Fig. 5). The superior 2 cm of the pectoralis major were released to provide exposure to the inferior aspect of the subscapularis and the anterior circumflex vessels. Then the arm was externally rotated to further expose the boundaries of the subscapularis and the anterior circumflex vessels and facilitating the release of the capsule from the humerus to the 6 o’clock position on the humerus. The lesser tuberosity was osteotomized with subscapularis tendon and was elevated to expose the humeral head. After releasing the posterior capsule and all the soft tissue, a small Cobb elevator was inserted through the rotator interval to the posterior part of the glenoid rim, and reduction of the dislocation was accomplished with lateral distraction and external rotation (Fig. 6). Good irrigation of the joint and proper debridement of bony and cartilaginous debris were done. The lesser tuberosity was transferred into the defect and with the help of a Giant Needle (size 2.5 mm) and 2–3 transosseous horizontal sutures with Ethibond 5–0 passed from lesser tuberosity to the humeral head, then retrieved and tied lateral to the bicipital groove (Fig. 7). Stability of the shoulder and the construct were evaluated intraoperatively by direct observation and fluoroscopy views through the entire range of motion. The wound was closed in layers using a suction drain.
Postoperatively, the shoulder was immobilized in 30° abduction and neutral rotation for 4 weeks. During this period, the sling was removed for passive external rotation exercises only and internal rotation was not allowed during this period. A program of physical therapy initiated, including passive, active-assisted, and progressively active range of motion and rotator cuff strengthening exercises. At 12 weeks postoperatively, full activity was allowed.
Results
Total functional outcome was assessed using modified UCLA scoring system. Total UCLA scores immediate postoperatively averaged 25.7 (range 21–27) out of 35. At last follow-up, average UCLA scores had been improved to 31 (range 27–34). All patients were satisfied with the level of function with no restrictions in activities of daily living. All patients were asymptomatic with painless and stable shoulder joints without apprehension or recurrence of instability. Mean range of shoulder motion was 166° of forward flexion (range 155–175°), 75° of external rotation (range 60–85°), 50° of internal rotation (range 45–65°), and 155° of abduction (range 140–165°) (Figs. 8 and 9). The transferred tuberosity was incorporated completely in the humeral head defect within average 8 weeks (Fig. 10).
On analyzing the functional outcome results at last follow-up, we get excellent results (30–35 points) achieved in 3 cases. Patients in this category have no pain, nearly normal shoulder motion, able to perform daily activities and even sports, adequate strength in lifting, pushing, and throwing with no shoulder instability. Good functional outcome achieved in four cases (26–30 points). Patients in this category have mild discomfort but no medications prescribed; they are capable of elevation, internal or external rotation of up to 75 %, mild-to-moderate limitation in daily activities and sports, with no shoulder instability. Fair results achieved in one case (21–25 points). The patient has moderate disabling pain, hence, he is on occasional medications; capable of elevation, lacking internal or external rotation of up to 50 %; moderate limitation in overhead activities and lifting; unable to throw; mild-to-moderate apprehension of the arm in extended position. Poor results (<21 points) achieved in one case. Patient has constant disabling pain, therefore constant medications prescribed; can barely reach the face; no rotation; unable to use the arm in useful activities, and recurrent subluxation evident.
Discussion
Chronic locked posterior dislocation of the shoulder is an uncommon injury which has been unrecognized for more than 3 weeks. It is characterized by the presence of an impression fracture of the articular surface of the humeral head [1]. The rarity of this injury, absence of clear radiographic signs in anteroposterior view unless an axillary view done and reluctance in clinical examination can lead to a missed diagnosis and delay of proper treatment. New technologies such as CT scanning with 3D-reconstruction allow better visualization and assessment of humeral head involvement and additional fracture lines [3]. Once this injury diagnosed, the management must be individualized depending on the amount of humeral head defect, the time passed from injury, and degree of instability.[10].
McLaughlin [5] described an operation in which he filled the defect with subscapularis tendon. The procedure was modified by taking a block of bone from the proximal humerus, including the lesser tuberosity and the attached subscapularis tendon, and fixed it in the defect of the head with a screw. The transfer of lesser tuberosity instead of subscapularis alone was first introduced by Hawkins et al. [11]. The osteotomized bone fragment offers better filling of the defect and more secure reinsertion of the tendon [12]. The advantages of transfer of the lesser tuberosity are better bony filling of the humeral head and more secure reinsertion of the subscapularis tendon [13] (Figs. 11, 12, and 13). These techniques have been criticized in the literature because they change the humeral head anatomy. Also, the presence of hardware necessitates later removal [12, 14–17]. In our protocol, we used Ethibond suture number (5) and Giant Needle to pass transosseous sutures to fix the lesser tuberosity to the main humeral head fragment. Accordingly, there is no need for second operation for hardware removal. Also, it is a cheap, less cost effect. Our study supports the use of the Neer and Hawkins modification of the McLaughlin procedure in patients with chronic locked posterior dislocation of the shoulder. In spite of small number of cases in our series, the results are similar to those achieved by many authors utilizing subscapularis tendon and lesser tuberosity as a bone graft. We used a more simple and cheap mode of fixation of the tuberosity graft which is suitable for underdeveloped countries.
Conclusion
This article described a modified McLaughlin technique using non-absorbable suture instead of the standard screw fixation for the lesser tuberosity graft in patients with neglected locked posterior dislocation of the shoulder. Despite the delay in diagnosis and treatment, no head collapse or arthritis was observed at last follow-up in any patient. No hardware present which necessitates later removal, and the technique is cheap, which is suitable for underdeveloped countries. The grafts healed completely, and no recurrent instability occurred in any shoulder.
References
Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Rel Res 214:160–164
Checchia SL, Santos PD, Miyazaki AN (1998) Surgical treatment of acute and chronic posterior fracture dislocation of the shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 7(1):53–65
Wadlington VR, Hendrix RW, Rogers LF (1992) Computed tomography of posterior fracture-dislocations of the shoulder: case reports. J Trauma 32:113–115
Aparicio G, Calvo E, Bonilla L, Espejo L (2000) Neglected traumatic posterior dislocations of the shoulder: controversies on indications for treatment and new CT scan findings. J Orthop Sci 5:37–42
McLaughlin HL (1952) Posterior dislocation of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am 24:584–590
Cicak N (2004) Posterior dislocation of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 86:324–332
Keppler P, Holz U, Thielemann FW, Meinig R (1994) Locked posterior dislocation of the shoulder: treatment using rotational osteotomy of the humerus. J Orthop Trauma 8:286–292
Gerber C, Lambert SM (1996) Allograft reconstruction of segmental defects of the humeral head for the treatment of chronic locked posterior dislocation of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78:376–382
Ozkan M, Gul O, Bacakoglu K, Ozcan C, Ekin A (2000) Treatment of posterior locked fracture dislocation of the shoulder with hemiarthroplasty. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 34:45–49
Sperling JW, Cofield RH, Rowland CM (2004) Minimum 15 years follow-up of Neer hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty in patients aged 50 years or younger. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 13:604–613
Hawkins RJ, Neer CS, Pianta RM, Mendoza FX (1987) Locked posterior dislocation of the shoulder. Bone Joint Surg (Am) 69(1):9–18
Robinson CM, Akhtar A, Mitchell M, Beavis C (2007) Complex posterior fracture dislocation of the shoulder. Epidemiology, injury patterns, and results of operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:1454–1466
Randelli M, Gambrioli PL (2001) Chronic posterior dislocations of the shoulder. In: Duparc J (ed) Surgical techniques in orthopaedics and traumatology. Elsevier, Paris, 55-190-B-10
Loebenberg MI, Cuomo F (2000) The treatment of chronic anterior and posterior dislocations of the glenohumeral joint and associated articular surface. Orthop Clin North Am 31(1):23–34
Delcogliano A, Caporaso A, Chiossi S, Delcogliano M (2005) Surgical management of chronic, unreduced posterior dislocation of the shoulder. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13(2):151–155
Bock P, Kluger R, Hintermann B (2007) Anatomical reconstruction for reverse Hill-Sachs lesions after posterior locked shoulder dislocation fracture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127(7):543–548
Charalambous CP, Gullett TK, Ravenscroft MJ (2009) Modification of McLaughlin procedure for persistent shoulder instability: technical note. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129(6):753–755
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
Said K. Abdel-Hameed revised the theoretical part of the review, participated in the sequence alignment, and drafted the manuscript. Ahmed Awad participated in the sequence alignment. M. Moazammi participated in the design of the study and performed the statistical analysis. Mohamed Adel conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination, and helped draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abdel-Hameed, S.K., Abdel-Aal, M.A. New technique in reconstructing humeral head defect in locked posterior dislocation of the shoulder: a case series of nine patients. Eur Orthop Traumatol 6, 157–162 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12570-015-0314-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12570-015-0314-2