Introduction

Organotin compounds (OTCs), the active biocides found in anti-fouling paints, are a class of environmental contaminants [1, 2] that cause shell thickening in oysters [3] and imposex (penis induction) in some female snails [46]. While OTCs have been banned from use in anti-fouling paints, some sites remain contaminated with relatively high concentrations [610].

There are two routes by which aquatic organisms accumulate chemicals from the environment. The first, bioconcentration, involves uptake from water through the gills and the second, biomagnification, involves uptake through the food chain. Research suggests that OTCs are transferred through the food chain [1114]. In our previous study, the results suggested that the rock shell, Thais clavigera, assimilates OTCs from the sediment and suspended particles as most of their prey are filter or suspension feeders in Kagoshima Bay, Japan. Currently the OTCs levels in bivalves, snails and sediment are relatively high.

To evaluate OTCs pollution and the potential for imposex induction in T. clavigera, we translocated some of them from a non-polluted area to a polluted area and held them with prey (P) or without prey (NP) in Kagoshima Bay. We also evaluated the contributions of OTCs in the water and their prey organisms to those of rock shells.

Materials and methods

Sample collection and experimental design

Rock shells were collected at Iso, a non-polluted site, and translocated to Akobaru where almost all female rock shells are still showing imposex from our annual observation of a polluted site in Kagoshima Bay (Figs. 1, 2) The rock shells were divided into two groups. One group (P) of 20 rock shells was placed in a mesh cage (33 × 24 × 7 cm; mesh size 2 mm) with prey organisms such as mussels, Septifer virgatus, and oyster, Saccostrea mordax, which we collected at Akobaru. The second group (NP) of 20 rock shells was placed inside a net (mesh size 1 mm) to isolate them from their prey and this net was placed in the same cage as the first group (Fig. 3). Five cages (40 individuals/cage) were placed in Akobaru in July 2006. Rock shells from both groups (P and NP) were collected from each cage in weeks 1, 2, 4 and 6. Thereafter, individuals from the NP group were sampled in week 8 and individuals from the P group in week 13, as shown in Table 1. We removed all individuals in the NP group at week 8 because of high mortality due to starvation. First, we measured the shell size and total weight of each individual, and then dissected them to examine them for imposex (induction of penis in females). After measuring the weight of the rock shells’ flesh, their condition factor, weight of flesh/(shell height)3 × 1000, was calculated. The flesh was removed and stored at −10 °C in the freezer until analysis. To determine the extent of imposex induction, we calculated a relative penis length (RPL) index as follows [5, 15]:

$${\text{RPL index (}}\% ) = \left( {\left( {\text{mean penis length of female}} \right)/\left( {\text{mean penis length of male}} \right)} \right) \times 100.$$
Fig. 1
figure 1

Study area and sampling sites

Fig. 2
figure 2

Induction of imposex in rock shells in Kagoshima Bay

Fig. 3
figure 3

Schematic of experimental design of the translocation experiment. Illustration of the cage containing rock shells that had access to prey (P) or did not have access to prey (NP)

Table 1 Organotin (0TC) concentrations in translocated rock shells with (P) and without (NP) prey organisms [mean ± SD; ng/g wet weight (w.w.)]

Analysis of OTCs

We measured the concentrations of the following OTCs in water samples and in rock shell samples collected in Akobaru: monobutyltin (MBT), dibutyltin (DBT), tributyltin (TBT), monophenyltin (MPT), diphenyltin (DPT), and triphenyltin (TPT). The samples were analyzed following the method described in Uno et al. [16]. Briefly, we added surrogate OTCs (MBT-d 9, DBT-d 18, TBT-d 27, MPT-d 5, DPT-d 10, and TPT-d 15), acetic acid-sodium acetate trihydrate buffer (pH 5), and sodium tetraethylborate (NaBEt4) to the water samples then extracted OTCs using n-hexane. The soft tissue samples were thawed then spiked with OTC surrogates in a similar manner. The spiked samples were homogenized then extracted with methanol-ethyl acetate (1:1, volume/volume) containing 1 M hydrobromic acid for 30 min by ultrasonication followed by centrifugation. After dehydrating the extract with anhydrous sodium sulfate, the OTCs were ethylated using a NaBEt4 solution. The lipids were saponified with an ethanol solution containing 1 M potassium hydroxide. OTCs were extracted twice with n-hexane. After concentrating the hexane solutions derived from the water and tissue samples, they were purified using a hexane-washed florisil column. The OTCs eluted by 5 % diethyl ether-hexane were analyzed by gas chromatography–mass spectroscopy (Agilent Technologies 6890 Series gas chromatograph equipped with a 5973 MSD mass selective detector). The detection limits of OTCs were 0.1 ng/l and 0.1 ng/g w.w., respectively. The recovery rates were 83.3 % for TBT, 71.2 % for DBT, 66.5 % for MBT, 88.4 % for TPT and 102.6 % for DPT in aquatic organisms and we did not correct our analysis results by these recovery rates.

Statistical analysis

The data were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test and a t-test. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 10.0J (SPSS, Tokyo). The level of significance was P < 0.05.

Results

Condition of translocated rock shell

The water temperature in Kagoshima Bay during our study period ranged from 23.5 to 30.2 C°. The shell height and total body weight were 22.8 ± 1.4 mm and 2.19 ± 0.3 g at the beginning (n = 30, mean ± SD), 23.3 ± 1.0 mm and 2.23 ± 0.29 g at week 8 in the NP group (n = 9) and 22.7 ± 1.1 mm and 2.58 ± 0.32 g at week 13 in the P group (n = 13), respectively. There were significant differences in the condition factor after week 2, but not in shell height and total body weight of rock shell individuals between the P and NP groups (Fig. 4). Survival was 50 and 45 % in the cages collected at week 6 and 8, respectively in the NP group. Conversely, survival was 95 % and 65 % at weeks 6 and 13 in the P group (Fig. 5).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Changes in the condition factor of translocated rock shells (mean ± SD). For abbreviations, see Fig. 3. ** Significantly different from P group (<0.01)

Fig. 5
figure 5

Survival of translocated rock shells. For abbreviations, see Fig. 3

Induction of imposex

Induction of imposex was observed at week 13 in the P group. A high proportion (71 %) of female rock shells in the P group (five of seven individuals) exhibited imposex (Fig. 6) and the RPL index of all female individuals was 15.1 % (26.3 % in imposex females).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Proportion of individuals exhibiting imposex induction, and relative penis length (RPL) index of translocated rock shells. For other abbreviations, see Fig. 3

OTC concentrations in translocated rock shells

The OTC concentrations are given in Table 1 for translocated rock shells and Table 2 for water, sediment, prey and wild rock shells. The ΣOTCs concentrations were higher in the P group than the NP group or the prey (Table 1). While the ratios of TBT in butyltins (sum of MBT, DBT and TBT) were around 50 % in the P group in week 13 and NP group in week 8, those of TPT in phenyltins (sum of MPT, DPT and TPT) were 56 % for the P group at week 13 and 22 % for the NP group at week 8, respectively. Similarly, the TBT concentrations were higher in individuals from the P group than the NP group. The TPT concentrations were not much different between the P group and NP group (Fig. 7). The tissue concentration of butyltins was higher than that of phenyltins.

Table 2 OTC concentrations in the rock shell, its environment and prey at Iso and Akobaru
Fig. 7
figure 7

Tributyltin (TBT) and triphenyltin (TPT) concentrations in translocated rock shells (mean ± SD). SD bars of TBT and TPT concentrations in the NP group were too small to show. For other abbreviations, see Fig. 3

The TBT concentration was 1.6 ng/g w.w. [3.9 ng/g dry weight (d.w.)] at the beginning and had increased by 483 and 424 ng/g w.w. (1210 and 1311 ng/g d.w.) by weeks 6 and 13 in the P group and 68.3 and 178 ng/g w.w. (206 and 548 ng/g d.w.) at weeks 6 and 8 in the NP group, respectively. The TPT concentrations was 3.9 ng/g w.w. (9.8 ng/g d.w.) at the beginning and had increased by 61.4 and 110 ng/g w.w. (154 and 339 ng/g d.w.) by weeks 6 and 13 in the P group and 21.3 and 47.0 ng/g w.w. (64.6 and 144 ng/g d.w.) by weeks 6 and 8 in the NP group, respectively. The TBT concentration almost reached steady state in the P group until week 6.

Discussion

The OTC concentrations found in the sediments, wild rock shells and prey organisms that were analyzed in 2005 but seemed not to have changed much by 2006, were higher in Akobaru than in Iso (Table 2). Conversely, the OTC concentrations in the water in 2006 had decreased relative to those in 2005 reported by Koyama et al. [6]. However, almost all female rock shells still exhibited imposex, as found in our annual survey at Akobaru (Fig. 2). The OTCs seem to have been released from a small shipyard and fishing boats in the past. Taken together, these observations suggest that Akobaru has been contaminated by OTCs and that the residue levels are high enough to induce imposex in female rock shell even presently. Interestingly, the initial tissue TBT and TPT concentrations were 1.6 and 3.9 ng/g w.w. (3.9 and 9.8 ng/g d.w.), thus, lower than levels reported from other sites: 4.3–16.7 ng Sn/g d.w. (10.5–40.8 ng TBT/g d.w., [17]), 18.0–400 ng TBT/g w.w., and 36.9–782 ng TPT/g w.w. [18], suggesting that the rock shells collected from Iso were less exposed to OTCs.

According to Shim et al. [19], TBT and TPT concentrations of translocated rock shells without prey in south Korea, whose RPL index increased from 36 to 74 %, reached a steady state on days 17 and 32 and increased from 179 to 436 ng TBT/g d.w. (66–160 ng TBT/g w.w., estimation by our w.w./d.w. ratio) and 47–218 ng TPT/g d.w. (17–80 ng TPT/g w.w.), respectively. While the TBT concentration in the waters of Akobaru was almost 1/10 of that reported by Shim et al. [19], TBT and TPT concentrations of the translocated rock shells of the NP group were 68.3 and 21.3 ng/g w.w. at week 6 and 178 and 47.0 ng/g w.w. at week 8, respectively, in the present study. These OTCs levels are similar to those reported by Shim et al. [19]. The estimated bioaccumulation factor (OTCshell/OTCwater) of TBT in rock shells (w.w. basis) in the present study, 1.48 × 105 (178/0.0012), was higher than 1.29 × 104 (168/0.013) estimated from Shim et al. [19]. The bioconcentration factor of TBT can increase depending on the reduction of the TBT concentration in marine gastropods [20] and fishes [21]. The efficiency of bioconcentration by the translocated rock shells also seemed to be relatively effective in lowering the TBT concentration in the water of Akobaru in the present study.

The TBT concentrations of the P group at weeks 6 and 13 (Table 1) were significantly higher than those of wild rock shells in Akobaru (Table 2). Rock shells prey on a variety of organisms such as barnacles, limpets and bivalves [22]. As reported by Tang et al. [23], TBT was also bioaccumulated by oysters and mussels. The OTCs accumulated in these prey organisms appear to be transferred to rock shells as well as the OTCs present in the water. Therefore, the translocated rock shells were caged with mussels and oysters in the present study. On the other hand, most wild rock shells distributed near a mussel community seemed to prey on mussels in our annual observation at Akobaru. As shown in Table 2, the OTC concentrations in oyster were much higher than those of mussels. These results suggest that the translocated rock shells preyed not only on mussels but also on oysters and, therefore, accumulated higher OTCs than wild ones.

Based on Horiguchi et al. [24] and Shim et al. [19], a RPL index >80 % was observed in wild rock shells which accumulated approximately 200 ng TBT/g w.w. and 200 ng TPT/g w.w. (estimation by our w.w./d.w. ratio). As shown in TBT and TPT accumulation profiles in Fig. 7, the TBT concentration in the translocated rock shells almost reached a steady state within 6 weeks. Their mean concentrations of TBT and TPT, 424 and 110 ng/g w.w. in the P group, were sufficient to induce imposex at week 13, suggesting that OTCs in water and prey at Akobaru were still at sufficiently toxic levels to induce imposex in rock shells in 2006 and until the present.

Although OTC concentrations in translocated rock shells of the P group were sufficient to induce imposex in the current study, their RPL index was 15.1 % (26.3 % in imposex females). According to the results of Shim et al. [19], the RPL index increased from 36 to 74 % in translocated rock shells without prey for 55 days. While the TBT and TPT concentrations of translocated rock shells of P group in the present study, i.e., 424 and 110 ng/g w.w., were much higher than those reported by Shim et al. [19], their RPL index, i.e., 15.1 % (26.3 % in imposex females), was smaller than those reported by Shim et al. [19].; however, the increase in the RPL index, 38 % (36–74 %) in their study was not so very different from our results. It took 13 weeks to induce imposex in the present study; however, it took only 32 days to induce a significantly longer mean female penis in translocated rock shells [19]. It possibly takes longer to induce imposex in non-imposex rock shells.

While TBT and TPT concentrations of translocated rock shells in the NP group in the present study were similar to those reported by Shim et al. [19], they did not induce imposex. This suggests that longer starvation suppressed the induction of imposex in non-imposex rock shells in NP group.

The concentration of TBT was higher in the P group than in the NP group suggesting that the potential of imposex induction in the sites of Kagoshima Bay is still high due to higher OTC concentrations in prey organisms. TBT can be accumulated from both water and prey bivalves [25] and marine snails [14] through the food web. Based on the lower OTC concentrations in the water, but higher concentrations in prey and sediment in Akobaru, OTCs in prey seemed to be one of the important sources of OTCs for rock shells in Akobaru. After the banning of OTCs, the sediment TBT concentration did not change significantly in south Korea [10]. The sediment TBT concentration of 123 ng/g d.w. in Akobaru in 2005 was medium level when compared with that of South Korea. This suggests that recovery from sediment pollution by TBT is difficult and that sediment can be one of the sources of TBT for coastal biota by desorption or resuspension of sediment-bound TBT.

In conclusion, OTCs levels in wild and translocated rock shells have been sufficient to induce imposex, suggesting that OTCs levels in the environment of Kagoshima Bay are also sufficient to induce imposex in rock shells there.