Abstract
Aspects of numerical results from computational experiments on representative volume element (RVE) problems using finite element analyses are discussed. Two different boundary conditions (BCs) are examined and compared numerically for volume elements with different sizes, where tests have been performed on the uniaxial tensile deformation of random particle reinforced composites. Structural heterogeneities near model boundaries such as the free-edges of particle/matrix interfaces significantly influenced the overall numerical solutions, producing force and displacement fluctuations along the boundaries. Interestingly, this effect was shown to be limited to surface regions within a certain distance of the boundaries, while the interior of the model showed almost identical strain fields regardless of the applied BCs. Also, the thickness of the BC-affected regions remained constant with varying volume element sizes in the models. When the volume element size was large enough compared to the thickness of the BC-affected regions, the structural response of most of the model was found to be almost independent of the applied BC such that the apparent properties converged to the effective properties. Finally, the mechanism that leads a RVE model for random heterogeneous materials to be representative is discussed in terms of the size of the volume element and the thickness of the BC-affected region.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
V. Kouznetsova, W. A. M. Brekelmans, and F. P. T. Baaijens, Comput. Mech. 27, 37 (2001).
F. Roters, P. Eisenlohr, L. Hantcherli, D. D. Tjahjanto, T. R. Bieler, and D. Raabe, Acta Mater. 58, 1152 (2010).
T. Kanit, S. Forest, I. Galliet, V. Mounoury, and D. Jeulin, Int. J. Solids Structures 40, 3647 (2003).
S. Ghosh, K. Lee, and P. Raghavan, Int. J. Solids Structures, 38, 2335 (2001).
A. Wongsto and S. Li, Compos. Part A 36, 1246 (2005).
D. Trias, J. Costa, A. Turon, and J. E. Hurtado, Acta Mater. 54, 3471 (2006).
I. M. Gitman, H. Askes, and L. J. Sluys, Eng. Fract. Mech. 74, 2518 (2007).
S. Kari, H. Berger, R. Rodriguez-Ramos, and U. Gabbert, Compos. Struct. 77, 23(2007).
H. J. Böhm, A. Eckschlager, and W. Han, Comput. Mater. Sci. 25, 42 (2002).
S. K. Paul, Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 21, 055001 (2013).
E.-Y. Kim, H. S. Yang, S. H. Han, J. H. Kwak, and S. H. Choi, Met. Mater. Int. 18, 573 (2012).
R. Hill, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 11, 357 (1963).
Z. Hashin, J. Appl. Mech. 50, 481 (1983).
W. J. Drugan and J. R. Willis, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 44, 497 (1996).
M. Ostoja-Starzewski, Prob. Eng. Mech. 21, 112 (2006).
Y. S. Song and J. R. Youn, Polymer. 47, 1741 (2006).
J. Yvonnet, Q. C. He, and C. Toulemonde, Compos.Sci. Tech. 68, 2818 (2008).
K. Sab, Eur. J. Mech. A 11, 585(1992).
C. Huet, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 38, 813 (1990).
S. Hazanov and C. Huet, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 42, 813 (1995).
B. Widom, J. Chem. Phys. 44, 3888 (1966).
W. J. Lee, J. H. Son, N. H. Kang, I. M. Park, and Y. H. Park, Scripta Mater. 61, 580 (2009).
W. J. Lee, J. H. Son, I. M. Park, and Y. H. Park, Comput. Mater. Sci. 48, 802 (2010).
Y. Nakasone, S. Yoshimoto, and T. A. Stolarski, Engineering Analysis with ANSYS Software, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford (2007).
S. Hazanov, Acta Mater. 134, 123 (1999).
S. Hazanov and M. Amieur, Int. J. Eng. Sci. 33, 1289 (1995).
C. Huet, Mech. Mater. 31,787 (1999).
Z. F. Khisaeva and M. Ostoja-Starzewski, J. Elasticity. 85, 153 (2006).
S. R. Annapragada, D. Sun, and S. V. Garimella, Comput. Mater. Sci. 40, 255 (2007).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cho, Y.J., Lee, W.J. & Park, Y.H. Effect of boundary conditions on the numerical solutions of representative volume element problems for random heterogeneous composite microstructures. Met. Mater. Int. 20, 1085–1093 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-014-6012-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-014-6012-8