Abstract
This study presents complementary approaches for enhancing the groundwater management in the Enfidha region (Tunisian Sahel). It integrated and analyzed geological, hydrogeological, well logs, and hydrochemical data for a better characterization of the Oued El Khairat aquifer; its geometry, hydrodynamics, and water quality were well-defined. The geometry was determined from the lithological columns and well logs analysis and correlations. Well logs allowed a precise delimitation of the Mio-Plio-Quaternary permeable layers, thus facilitating the creation of two- and three-dimensional representations elucidating the water reservoirs arrangement. These representations highlight that coarse deposits are more abundant in the western part of Oued El Khairat plain than in its eastern part. The aquifer hydrodynamics was studied using piezometry and transmissivity data. The piezometric maps indicate a main groundwater flow from the west to the east. The transmissivity measures vary between 1.2 10−4 and 1.56.10−2 m2/s. The permeability coefficients, derived by subdividing these measures by the aquifer thicknesses, are relatively higher (0.73 10−4 and 4.3 10−4 m/s) in the center-east part of the plain. The water quality is assessed through the salinity and chemical composition data. The salinity map shows values ranging from 1.5 to 3.1 g/l with gradual increase according to the groundwater flow direction (from the west to the east). Hydrochemical analyses show that the majority of water samples present sulfate facies. The results highlighted that the western and central-eastern parts of Oued El Khairat plain are the most suitable zones for the exploitation of this aquifer.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
In the last decades, population growth, socio-economic development, and climate change have been remarkably depleting water resources, thus generating the most serious problem that threatens the humanity (Mendonça 2004; UNESCO 2015; IPPC 2018; Masson–Delmote 2020; UN-Water 2021). Tunisia, located in North Africa (Fig. 1a) is among the forty-four countries presenting “high” levels of water stress, where on average more than 40% of available supply is withdrawn every year (WRI 2019). Aware such situation, it has adopted since 1970 a water polity aiming the equilibrium water need–water availability (Treyer 2002) and whose main actions are (Ayadi 2017): (1) better knowledge of resources; (2) mobilization of the recognized resources; (3) economy and rational exploitation of water; (4) use of unconventional water (seawater desalination, wastewater treatment…); (5) prevention and control of water resources pollution.
A factual example is exposed by the present publication resulting from cooperation between the Water Research and Technology Center (CERTE) and the Regional Commissariat of Agricole Development (CRDA) of Sousse. It implicated different disciplines—geology, hydrogeology, geophysics, hydrochemistry, and geomatics to refine the knowledge of the aquifer system in Enfidha region (Tunisian Sahel) (Fig. 1b) and consequently determine suitable areas for the exploitation of the Oued El Khairat aquifer, which constitutes with Chegarnia–Sidi Aibiche aquifer, the most important regional groundwater resources.
Hydrogeological works covering the entire Enfidha region (El Batti 1974; Horriche et al. 2013; Zammouri et al. 2013). They were mainly focused on the Oued El Khairat aquifer (Manaa et al. 1996; Chadly 2002; Zammouri et al. 2006; Ketata et al. 2011; 2014; Chekirbane et al. 2021). Artificial recharge and its impact on this aquifer hydrodynamic and hydrochemical characteristics is the most considered subject. It is treated by Aloui et al. (2021) for Chegarnia–Sidi Aibiche aquifer.
Geographical, geological, and hydrogeological contexts
Enfidha is a coastal agricultural region occupying the northern part of Sousse Governorate (Fig. 1c). It is limited by Bouficha to the north, Sidi Bou Ali to the south, Jebel Fkirine (part of the Zaghouan Governorate) to the west and Mediterranean Sea to the east (Fig. 1d). It is marked by two evaporitic depressions: Sabkhet Khlifa in the north and Sabkhet Assa Djribia in the south. Its climate is semi-arid with annual precipitation varying between 300 and 400 mm/year (INGREF 2000).
Geologically, Enfidha region is shared between two different structural domains in Tunisia: the Atlasic domain in the north and the pelagic platform in the south (Fig. 2a). The northern Atlasic domain corresponds to a folded and faulted domain constituted of plenty NE-SW anticlines and NW–SE grabens (Jauzein 1967; Turki 1985; Ben Ayed 1986; Chihi 1995; Ben Chelbi 2007; Mzali 2010), while the pelagic platform is a relatively tabular area without significant reliefs. Geophysical data have identified complex structures in its subsurface (Haller 1983; Ellouze 1984; Bédir 1995 Gabtni 2005; Boussiga 2008; Hezzi 2014; Belkhiria et al. 2017).
Different tectonic structures characterize the Enfidha region (Fig. 2b). Jebel Mdeker, located in the northwestern zone, is a large anticline divided into three distinct compartments by three major meridian faults (Castany 1951). It is bordered to the west by the Saouef syncline eastern flank, oriented N25 and composed of Oligocene deposits (Banjanik et al. 1978; Briki 2013). The northeastern zone corresponds to the highly faulted structure of Jebel Abid (Lajmi and Biely 1974); faults with different directions compartmentalize this dome in several horsts and grabens. The NE-SW synclinal structure of Chegarnia–Sidi Abiche occurs in the center-east, while the Jebel Garci marks the center-west zone. It is truncated by major faults, mainly oriented NW–SE and E-W (Meddeb 1986; Saadi 1990).
The geological outcrops have different ages ranging from Jurassic to Quaternary in age (Fig. 2c).
The Jurassic deposits, restricted to Jebel Mdeker core (Fig. 2b), are composed of dolomites and marly limestones. The Cretaceous sediments outcropping at Jebel Mehjoul, Jebel Mdeker, Jebel Garci, Jebel Mania, Jebel Akera, Kef Nsoura, Jebel Bou Sefra, and Jebel Abid are made up of marls and limestones with sandstones and quartzites at the base. Marly outcrops mainly recognized at Jebel Garci, Jebel Mdeker, and the southwestern extremity of the study area represent the Paleocene. The Eocene series is widely exposed (Fig. 2b). Its lower part is constituted of Globigerina limestones, whereas its upper part consists of marls with limestone intercalations. The Oligocene outcrops extending mostly along the Saouef syncline border are made up of sandstones, marls, and clays with sandy and gypsum intercalations. Encountered in the central and western parts of the Enfidha region (Fig. 2b), the Miocene series is composed of sands, sandy clays, limestones, conglomerates, gypseous clays, and sandstones interbedded by clay beds. The Mio-Pliocene deposits, scattered throughout the study area, are constituted of red sandy marls, coarse sands, and conglomerates. Scree, Sebkha, soils, dunes, actual beaches, alluvia, and terraces constitute the Quaternary sediments covering the eastern part of the Enfidha region.
Two main Mio-Plio-Quaternary hydrogeological systems characterize the study area: Oued El Khairat and Chegarnia-SidiAbiche aquifers (Fig. 2b). They are recharged by rainwater infiltration, essentially into river beds (Oued el Breck, Oued Sidi Abiche, Oued El Khairat) (El Batti 1974; Manaa et al. 1996; Horriche et al 2013). According to the reservoir’s depth, each aquifer comprises shallow and deep water tables, respectively exploited by surface wells (do not exceeding 50 m depth) and boreholes (deeper than 50 m). The resources of the Oued El Khairat and Chegarnia–Sidi Abiche shallow water tables were evaluated respectively to 0, 95, and 1, 8Mm3/year (DGRE 2015). Those of Chegarnia–Sidi Abiche are intensely exploited through 389 surface wells.
Concerning the deep water tables, the estimated resources are more elevated for Oued El Khairat aquifer (5, 6 Mm3/year) than Chegarnia–Sidi Abiche aquifer (1, 7 Mm3/year). The annual withdrawals are generally in equilibrium with the available volumes. Exceptional augmentation of exploitation was recorded during the period 2012–2014 for the Chegarnia–Sidi Abiche aquifer and in 2018 for the Oued El Khairat aquifer (e.g., DGRE 2018).
Data and methodology
Data acquired at 59 water boreholes exploiting the Oued El Khairat aquifer and 12 piezometers monitoring this aquifer were used in this study (Fig. 3). They comprise lithological columns and their corresponding well logs as well as hydrodynamic (transmissivity and piezometry) and hydrochemical (water salinity and chemical composition of major elements) measures.
Wells logs consisting mainly of gamma ray (GR) and resistivity logs were analyzed for a more accurate lithology description and precise delimitation of reservoirs’ layers. Clays expressing low resistivity values have high radioactivity values given their richness in radioactive elements (Desbrandes 1985; Asquith and Gibson 1982; Chapellier 1992; Bassiouni 1994; Doveton 1994). Reservoir formations (gravels, sands, limestones) exhibit low radioactivities (Luthi 2001), while their resistivities are enormously influenced by the quality of water imbibition (Heurteaux 1988; Glover 2012; Liu 2017). Thus, we have focused our analysis on the GR logs since they reflect the lithological composition better than the resistivity logs.
In the geographic information system (GIS), more and more applied in hydrogeological studies (e.g., Gogu et al. 2001; Trabelsi et al. 2006; Jourda et al. 2015) were used to process the available data (Fig. 4) and identify the main characteristics of the aquifer such as its geometry, hydrodynamics, and water quality.
The geometry of the Oued El Khairat aquifer were determined from the restored lithological logs, which were subdivided into clayey and predominantly coarse units to make easier the elaboration of three-dimensional representations showing the reservoir formations arrangement. Furthermore, we have established a reservoir abundance map, after calculating the percentage of coarse formations in the intersected Mio-Plio-Quaternary series. Independently of the boreholes depths, we have retained a common thickness of 100 m for this series.
Transmissivity (T) and piezometric data were exploited to study the aquifer hydrodynamics. These parameters assessment is crucial to apprehend the functioning of an aquifer and evaluate its reserves (Nemeth and Solo-Gabriele 2003; Caballero et al. 2007; Cao et al. 2019).
Concerning groundwater quality, it was evaluated via salinity measures and chemical composition analyses, which were represented in the form of maps, curves and diagrams.
At the final stage, the different thematic layers roduced representations relating to the geometry, hydrodynamics, and water quality were confronted and superposed to delimit the suitable zones for the exploitation of the Oued El Khairat aquifer.
Results and discussion
Geometry of the Oued El Khairat aquifer
In Oued El Khairat plain, the differentiation between the Miocene and Plio-Quaternary deposits in the different water boreholes is difficult, given the similitude of lithologies characterizing these deposits. However, we are sure that KH 10 (202 m depth), M (82 m depth), MH (45 m depth), and LH (90 m depth) boreholes represent Miocene series since they are implanted on outcrops of this series.
Well logs analysis allowed accurate distinction between permeable and impermeable layers within Miocene to Mio-Plio-Quaternary deposits in Oued El Khairat plain. Clayey and predominantly coarse formations varying in number, arrangement, and thickness have been defined.
KH10, the deepest borehole (202 m) among those intersecting Miocene deposits, exposes through its lithological column and gamma ray log seven lithological units composed of three coarse units identified between 0–27 m, 54–73 m and 108–165 m, three clayey–marly units detected between 27–54 m, 73–98 m, and 165–202 m and a limestone unity constituting the Ain Ghrab Formation, which is Miocene in age (Fig. 5a).
Undifferentiated Mio-Plio-Quaternary series may be composed of one to six lithological units. Indeed, in the KH 7 (Fig. 5b) and KH9 boreholes, the totality of this series is represented by a reservoir formation. The KH2, KH 4 (Fig. 5c) and KH 6 boreholes reveal a coarse unity overlying a predominantly clayey unit. Equally, the KH3, KH5, and KH12 boreholes show a single permeable formation, but between clayey and marly units (Fig. 5d). Contrary, in the KH1 and KH8 boreholes, a clay unit separates two coarse formations (Fig. 5e). An additional impermeable formation is defined in the KH14 and KH15 boreholes, which reveal on the whole four lithological formations (Fig. 5f). Five formations were identified in the AR borehole: three of them are clayey and two are coarse (Fig. 5g). They are interbedded by a limestone unit in the KH16 borehole (Fig. 5e).The age of this unit isn’t indicated in the borehole report (Khouadja and Kaddeche 1966).
The reservoir abundance map (Fig. 6a) reveals that in the majority of water boreholes, the coarse units constitute between 50 and 75% of a 110-m-thick Mio-Plio-Quaternary series. The highest percentages (75 to 100%) are mainly encountered in the western part of the plain. They may be explained by the fact that this zone corresponds to the upstream of Oued El Khairat. In fact, in a watercourse, the current velocity decreases from upstream to downstream inducing upward–fining of the transported elements; the coarsest were firstly deposed in the upstream where the current is strong (Birot 1981; Ballais et al. 1999).
The 3D lithological model (Fig. 6b) resulting from the correlation between the restored lithological columns support the reservoir abundance map by showing that permeable formations are clearly more developed in the western part than in the eastern part of Oued El Khairat plain. Moreover, this model reveals that a superficial coarse unit extends over a large part of the plain. It includes the shallow reservoirs layers and fosters the recharge of deeper ones. In some localities, it is substituted by clay unit that may have important thickness (case of the KH12, where this unit is 78 m thick), so that the main aquifer is reached at important depths. The clayey layers separating coarse units present also variable thickness, thus having different repercussions on the reservoirs interconnection; it is hindered by their thickening (for instance KH15 and FH boreholes), but fostered by their thinning (for instance, AR and MF boreholes).
Hydrodynamics of the Oued El Khairat aquifer
The piezometric data acquired in 2019 have allowed studying the spatial evolution of the piezometry for the shallow (Fig. 7a) and deep water tables (Fig. 7b).
The piezometric map of the shallow water table shows values ranging from 42 to − 1 m/sea level with a gradual decrease from west to east. Comparable values (from 39 to − 2.5 m/sea level) and similar evolution are observed for the deep water table. This indicates that the Oued Khairat aquifer is characterized by an E-W groundwater flow and that its recharge occurs mainly in its western part (Zammouri et al. 2006).
The temporal evolution of the piezometry is followed at the KH26 (Fig. 7c) and KH7 (Fig. 7b) piezometers, which present the most continuous measures over the years, respectively for the shallow and deep water tables. Both, KH26 and KH7 show a general piezometry decrease; for example, at KH26, it was 45.79 m/sea level in 2011, but it decreased to 42.3 m/sea level in 2019. A remarkable piezometry increase is noticed in the year 2012; it reached 50/sea level at KH7 piezometer. This increase coincides with a reduction in groundwater exploitation and a rainfall increase inducing significant recharge of the aquifer (Zouaidi 2019).
Passing to the assessment of the transmissivity, which is a determining hydrodynamic parameter to characterize the productivity of an aquifer (Castany 1982; Sen 2015); high transmissivity reflects high aquifer productivity. It is usually determined from pumping tests and corresponds to the product of permeability coefficient (K) and aquifer thickness (Freeze and Cherry 1979). Using this relation, we have deduced and evaluated the permability values characterizing the Oued El Khairat aquifer.
The available transmissivity measures vary between 0.12 10−3 and 15.6 10−3 m2/s. The highest ones are encountered in the KH 6, KH14, and KH11boreholes, located in the center-east (Fig. 8a) indicating that this zone presents the highest productivity of the aquifer.
The obtained permeability map (Fig. 8b) exposes values ranging from 0.02 10−4 to 4.3 10−4 m/s. Similar to the transmissivity map, the center-east zone reveals the most elevated values.
In the KH11 borehole showing the best permeability (4.3 10−4 m/s), the Mio-Plio-Quaternary reservoir formation, thick of 35 m, contains pebbles and gravels (Manaa and Bouasker 1987) having coarse granulometry and large intergranular space. The fact that KH11 is close to a river (Fig. 8b) can explain the occurrence of such sediments; the deposits granulometry decreases while moving away from the river bed (Bravard and Petit 1997). KH 11 is located near the KH8 borehole, which reveals a percentage of 100% on the reservoir abundance map (Fig. 6a).
Unfortunately, we do not have information about the permeability of the Mio-Plio-Quaternary aquifer at the Oued El Kairat upstream, but logically, it should be high given the richness of this zone in coarse deposits (Fig. 6a).
Quality of the Oued El Kairat aquifer
The water salinity values of the Oued El Kairat deep aquifer (Fig. 9a) range from 1.5 to 3.1 g/l. They show a general gradual increase in salinity in the groundwater flow direction (from the west to the east) (Fig. 7b). Some anomalies are observed, for instance the Fc borehole (3 g/l) is situated further west than the KH36 borehole (2.1 g/l), while it exhibits higher salinity that can be explained by different factors such as Salinization of water is due to the local exploitation rate, water -reservoir rock interaction and the salinity of recharged water (Subba Rao 2008).
Chemical analyzes of the Oued El Kairat deep water, made up at 12 boreholes distributed over the whole plain, were plotted on Piper (Fig. 9b) and Schoeller (Fig. 9c) diagrams. They reveal variable concentrations in major elements: Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, HCO3− SO2−4, and Cl−. SO42−, Cl−, and Na+ are the dominant chemical elements, indicating sulfate and chloride-sodic facies. In the majority of boreholes, SO42− exhibits the highest concentrations that vary between 298 (at KH10) and 1296 mg/l (at KH6). This richness in sulfate may be explained by the dissolution of evaporites minerals and /or sulfide oxidation (Cao et al. 2019; Long et al. 2021). Cl− concentrations range from 276.9 (at KH10) to 1091.5 mg/l (at KH14). Those of Na+ are between 194 (at KH10) to 751.5 mg/l (at KH14). Sodium and chloride contents were presumably derived from halite dissolution (Zaczek and Porowski 2017; Mehr et al 2019).
According to WHO’s drinking water standards 2017, the guidelines fixed for SO42−, Cl−, and Na+ are respectively 500, 250, and 200 mg/l; for the different groundwater samples, the Cl− concentrations exceed the guidelines. Concerning SO42−, KH10 (298 mg/l) and KH33 (494 mg/l) boreholes provide water suitable for drinking. It is only KH10 (194 mg/l) for Na + .
A previous study of Ketata et al. (2012) dealing with the geochimistry of the Oued El Khairat aquifer has also shown sulfate ion as dominant anion and sodium as dominant cation. This study has revealed that the average TDS (total dissolved solids) value of the shallow water table ranges from 739 to 2300 mg/l.
Determination of zones suitable for exploitation
The most suitable zones for the exploitation of Oued El Khairat aquifer present the best characteristics relating to its geometry, hydrodynamics and water quality. To determine these zones, we have superimposed the different established maps: the reservoir abundance (Fig. 6a), piezometric (Fig. 7), transmissivity (Fig. 8a), permeability (Fig. 8b), and water salinity (Fig. 9a) maps. The obtained representation shows that the western part of the Oued El Kairat aquifer exhibits the best characteristics (Fig. 10). It presents developed reservoir formations (the coarse layers constitute between 75 to 100% of a 110 thick Mio-Plio-Quaternary series), the lowest water salinities (1.5 to 2 g/l), the highest piezometric levels (30 to 42 m/sea level) and logically high permeabilities (the Oued El Kairat upstream).
Interesting zones for exploitation occur also in the central-eastern part of the plain; they represent high transmissivity (15.6 10−3 m2/s) and permeability values (4.3 10−4 m/s).
Conclusion
Diverse data relating to the Oued El Khairat Mio-Plio-Quaternary aquifer: lithological columns, well logs as well as hydrodynamic and hydrochemical measures were integrated using geographical information system (GIS) to define the suitable areas for the exploitation of this aquifer, which constitutes an important resource of groundwater in Enfidha region.
Reservoir abundance map and three-dimensional representation generated from the analysis of lithological columns and well logs highlight that the thickest reservoir formations are encountered in the western part of the Oued El Khairat plain. The established piezometric maps show that this zone is characterized also by the higher water levels. Besides, it is marked by the lowest water salinity values. So, this zone appears the most suitable for the exploitation of Oued El Khairat aquifer. The central-eastern part presenting high transmissivity and permeability values may be also an attractive zone.
The obtained results can enormously contribute to the management of groundwater in the Enfidha region. They will surely be ameliorated by incorporating other data methods such as vertical electrical soundings (VES) data, which will refine the reconstitution of the aquifer geometry. Additionally, our study can be used as reference of the use of complementary approaches to enhance the groundwater management.
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the Regional Commissariat of Agricole Development (CRDA) of Sousse and the General Directorate of Water Resources (DGRE).
References
Ahmed MA, Abdel Samie SG, Badawy HA (2013) Factors controlling mechanisms of groundwater salinization and hydrogeochemical process in the Quaternary aquifer of the eastern Nile delta Egytp. Environ Earth Sci 68:369–394
Amri R and Bouasker M (1994)Compte rendu de fin de travaux du forage El Garci 8. Direction Génerale des Resources en Eau.14p
Aloui D, Chekirbane A, Msaddek M H ,Mlayah A (2021) ManagedAquifer RECHARGE FEASIBILITY in Chgarnia – Sidi Abiche coastalaquifer, Enfidha plain, NE of Tunisia. 3rd Atlas Georessource International Congress AGIC-2021 : Water Quality, Global Changes and Groundwater Responses
Ayadi M (2017) Stratégie de Mobilisation des Ressources en Eau en Tunisie. Direction Générale des Ressources en Eau.
Asquith G and Gibson C (1982) Basic well log analysis for geologists. AAPG Publications.Tulsa , OK, 216 p
Bedir M (1995) Mécanismes géodynamiques des bassins associés aux couloirs de coulissements de la marge atlasique de la Tunisie. Seismo-Stratigraphique ,Seismo-Tectonique et Implications pétrolières. Thèse d’Etat .Univ. de Tunis II.315p.
Ballais JL et al. (1999) L’érosion entre nature et société. Paris: SEDES
Banjanik S, Biely A, SalajS , El Batti D (1978) Notice de la feuille d’Enfidaville n°43. Service géologique de Tunisie
Bassiouni Z (1994) Theory, measurement and interpretation of well logs. SPE Textbook Series, vol 4. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson.ISBN: 978–1–55563–056–0
Ben Ayed N (1986) Evolution tectonique de l’avant pays de la chaîne alpine de la Tunisie du début du Mésozoïque à l’actuel. Thèse d’Etat. 286 p
Ben Haj Ali M, Jédoui Y, Dali T, Bensalem H, Memmi L (1985) Carte géologique 1/500000 de la Tunisie. Service géologique, Office National des Mines, Tunis.
Ben Chelbi M (2007) Analyse tectonique des structures liées à la faille de Tunis Ellès. Thèse de Doctorat. Université Tunis El Manar.235p
Belkhiria W, Boussiga H, Inoubli MH (2017) Thick-skinned tectonics within the intracontinental eastern most Atlas foreland-and-thrust belt (Tunisia): Meso-Cenozoic kinematics and implications for regional geodynamics. Tectonics 36:981–1004
Birot P (198) Les processus d’érosion à la surface des continents. Paris: Masson
Boussiga H (2008) Géophysique appliquée aux séries paléogènes du Sahel de Tunisie. Tectonique de socle, halocinèse et implications pétrolières. Thèse de Doctorat. Université Tunis El Manar.159p
Bravard JP, Petit F (1997) Les cours d’eau. Dynamique du système fluvial. France: Armand Colin
Briki H (2013) Analyses de structures géologiques de l’Atlas nord-oriental : région de Bouficha-Enfidha, mémoire de mastère, Université Tunis El Manar. 88p
Caballero Y, Wyns R, Miehé JM, Bodéré G, Bourgine B, Baltassat JM (2007) Estimation de la réserve en eau souterraine participant à l’étiage desrivières, dans le socle granitique de Corse. Application au bassin versant de haut-Rizzanese.Rapportfinal.BRGM/ RP55121. BRGM, Orléans
Cao F, Jaunat J, Vergnaud-Ayraud V, Devau N, Labasque T, Guillou A, Guillaneuf A, Hubert J, Aquilina L, Ollivier P (2019) Heterogeneous behaviour of unconfined Chalk aquifers infer from combination of groundwater residence time , hydrochemistry and hydrodynamic tools. J Hydrol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124433
Castany G (1951) Étude géologique de l’Atlas Tunisien Oriental. Thèse d’Etat. 632p
Castany G (1982) Principes et méthodes de l’hydrogeologie. Editions DUNOD, Paris
Chadli B (2000) Rapport du piézomètre Garci 5.Direction Génerale des Resources en Eau. 4p
Chadly B (2002) Impact de la recharge de la nappe d’oued El Khairat par les lâchés du barrage «Oued El Khairat». Report, General Direction of Water Resources, Tunisia
Chadli B (2007) Rapport du sondage Enfidha 6bis. Direction Génerale des Resources en Eau. 7p.
Chadli B and Sehli A (2000) Rapport du sondage Neffet. Direction Génerale des Resources en Eau. 8p.
Chapellier D (1992) Well logging in hydrogeology. AA Balkema, Rotterdam, 175 p
Chekirbane A , Aloui, D., Khadhar , S. , Lachaal, F , Tarhouni, J, and Mlayah, A. (2021) : After behavior in a hydrologically modified watershed by a managed aquifer recharge system (WadiKhairat, NE of Tunisia): insights from hydrodynamic and geochemical information. 3rd Atlas Georessource International Congress AGIC-2021: Water Quality, Global Changes and Groundwater Responses
Chihi L (1995) Les fossés néogènes à quaternaires de la Tunisie et de la mer pélagienne : Etude structurale et leur signification dans le cadre géodynamique de la Méditerranée centrale. Thèse Es-Sciences. Univ. Tunis El Mannar II, 568 p
Glover W (2012) Petrophysics MSc course notes. Aberdeen: University of Aberdeen
Desbrandes R (1985) Encyclopedia of well logging, Edition Technip, Paris, 587p
DGRE (2000) Rapport du sondage Garci 4bis.Direction Génerale des Resources en Eau. 4p.
DGRE (2015) Situation de l’exploitation des nappes phréatiques (Chaque cinq ans). Direction Générale des Ressources en Eau, Tunis. 170 p
DGRE (2018) Annuaire d’exploitation des nappes profondes. Publication de la Direction Générale des Ressources en Eau, Tunis .320p
Doveton J H (1994) Geological log interpretation. SEPM (Society for Sedimentary Geology) Short Course 29. https://doi.org/10.2110/scn.94.29.0036. 180p
El Batti D (1974) Hydrogéologie de la plaine d’Enfidaville. Thèse de 3ème cycle , 122p.
El Batti D, Mansour H , Hassani B (1979) Compte rendu de fin de travaux et d’essai de débit du forage Oued El Khairat 2. Direction Génerale des Resources en Eau.9p
Ellouze N (1984) Etude de la subsidence de la Tunisie atlasique orientale et de la mer pélagienne. Thèse de Doctorat 3ème cycle. Sciences de la terre Géodynamique, Université Paris VI, 1984, p 129
Freeze R A and Cherry JA (1979) Groundwater. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice-Hall International. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913338100500412. 604p
Gabtni H (2005) Apport de la gravimétrie à l’étude des structures profondes du Sahel de Tunisie (cas de la region de Kairouan– Sousse–Monastir). CR Geosci, 1409–1414.
Ghanmi M (2003) Géodynamique de la plate-forme saharienne et sa marge septentrionale au Crétacé, son évolution vers l’Atlas septentrional ; interférences du rifting et de l’Halocinèse, HDR. Faculté des Sciences de Tunis .347 p.
Gogu RC, Carabin G, Hallet V, Peters V, Dassargues A (2001) : GIS-basedhydrogeologicaldatabases and groundwatermodelling. Hydrogeology Journal 555–569
Haller P (1983) Structure profonde du Sahel tunisien: interprétation géodynamique. Thèse de Doctorat. Université de Franche-Comté, Dole. 162 p
Heurteaux P (1988) Mesure de la salinité des eaux naturelles en hydrologie et en hydrobiologie. Essai pour une standardisation de l'expression des résultats, Ecologia Mediterranea, 149–166. https://www.persee.fr/collection/ecmed
Hezzi I (2014) Caractérisation géophysique de la plateforme de Sahel, Tunisie nord-orientale et ses conséquences géodynamiques. Thèse de Doctorat. Univ. Rennes 1, Rennes. 316 p
Horriche F, Zammouri M, Benabdallah S (2013) Effect of planned marina on Enfidha groundwater (Tunisia). A local-scale groundwater modeling. IEEE. 5p
INGREF (2000) Carte bioclimatique, Institut National de Recherches en Génie Rural, Eaux et Forêts. 1p
IPCC (2018) Global warming of 1.5 °C : an IPCC special report on the impacts of global warning of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty (in Masson –Delmote , 2020).
Jauzein A (1967) Contribution à l’etude géologique de la Tunisie septentrionale : les confins de la dorsale tunisienne. Thèse d’Etat ,425p
Jourda J P, Kouamé KJ, Saley M B, Eba LE, Anani AT ,Biemi J (2015) Détermination des zones potentiellement favorables à l’implantation de forages manuels à partir d’analyse multicritère et d’un SIG: cas de la Côte d’Ivoire. Rev Sci Eau 119–137
Ketata M, Gueddari M, Bouhlila R (2011) Suitability assessment of shallow and deep groundwaters for drinking and irrigation use in the El Khairat aquifer (Enfidha, Tunisian Sahel). Environ Earth Sci 313–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1091-z.
Ketata M, GueddariM, Bouhlila R (2014) Hydrodynamic and salinity evolution of groundwaters during artificial recharge within semi-arid coastal aquifers : a case study of El Khairat aquifer system in Enfidha (Tunisian Sahel). J African Earth Sci 224–225
Khouadja A and KaddecheM (1966) Rapport du sondage d’oued Sidi Ncir. Direction Génerale des Resources en Eau. 6p.
Lajmi L and Biely A (1974) Carte géologique de la Tunisie au1/50 000, feuille n° 43 d’Enfidaville. Service géologique de la Tunisie
Liu H (2017): Principles and applications of well logging. Springer, Berlin. 356 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54977-3
Long Y, Huang T, Zhang F, Li Z, Ma B, Li Y, Pang Z (2021) Origin of sulphate in the unsaturated zone and groundwater of a loess aquifer. Hydrological Process. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14166
Luthi S (2001) Geological well logs: their use in reservoir modeling. Springer, Berlin. ISBN 10:3540678409
Manaa M, Bouasker M (1987) Compte rendu de fin de travaux du forage Saniet Khalifa 3 Rapport de la Direction Générale des Ressources en Eaux, 15 p
Manaa M, Chaieb H, Amri R (1996) Etude par modèle hydrogéologique de la nappe alluviale de l’oued el khairat, Rapport de la Direction Générale des Ressources en Eaux, 57 p
Masson-Delmote V (2020) Réchauffement climatique : état de connaissances scientifiques, enjeux , risques et options d’action. Comptes Rendus Géoscience, 1–27 p
Meddeb S (1986) Sédimentation et tectonique polyphasée dans les dômes d’Enfidha (Sahel tunisien). Thèse de doctorat 3éme cycle. Univ. Paris-Sud, 151 p
Mehr SS, Moghaddam AMA, Field S (2019) Hydrogeological and geochemical evidence for the origin of brackish groundwater in the Shabestar plain aquifer, northwest Iran. Sustain Water Resour Manag 5:1381–1404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-017-0192-6
Mendonça F (2004) Rechauffement global et santé : aspects généraux et quelques particularités du monde tropical .Climatologie. https://doi.org/10.4267/climatologie.1077
Mzali H (2010) Etude des déformations et évolution des paléocontraintes dans la région de BouFicha-Grombalia. Thèse de Doctorat, Faculté des sciences de Tunis, 164p
Nemeth MS and Solo-Gabriele H M (2003) Evaluation of the use of reach transmissivity to quantify exchange between groundwater and surface water, Journal of Hydrology, 145–159
Saadi J (1990) Exemple de sédimentation syntectonique au Crétacé inférieur le long d’une zone de décrochement NS. Les structures d’Enfidha (Tunisienord-orientale). Géodynamique 5.pp : 17–33
Sen Zekai (2015) Practical and Applied Hydrogeology. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-14020-2
Subba Rao N (2008) Factors controlling the salinity in groundwater in parts of Guntur district, Andhra Pradesh, India. Environ Monit Assess 138:327–341
Trabelsi N, Zairi MTriki I and Ben Dhia H (2006) Contribution d’un SIG à la gestion des ressources en eaux souterraines: cas de la nappe profonde de Sfax, Tunisie. In: Conf Francophone ESRI, Issy-lesMoulineaux, France, 11–12 Oct 2006
Treyer S (2002) Analyse des stratégies et prospectives de l’eau en Tunisie.Etude réalisée par le Plan Bleu avec le soutien du Etude réalisée par le Plan Bleu avec le soutien du Ministère de l’Ecologie et du Développement Durable Direction de l’Eau Ministère de l’Ecologie et du Développement Durable Direction de l’Eau et de l’Agence de l’Eau Rhône Méditerranéen Corse
Turki MM (1985) Polycinématique et contrôle sédimentaire associé sur lacicatrice Zaghouan—Nebhana. Thèse de Doctorat d’Etat. Université de Tunis, Tunis
Trabelsi A (2008)Compte rendu de fin de travaux du forage Arbi Messaoudi. Direction Génerale des Resources en Eau. 7p
UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) (2015) Water for a sustainable world. The United Nations World Water Development Report 2015.139 p
UN-Water (United Nations-Water) (2021) Sustainable Development Goal 6 (SDG 6): water and sanitation for all. UN-Water publication 54p.
WHO (World Health Organization) (2017) Guidelines for drinking-water quality: fourth edition incorporating the first addendum. ISBN 978–92–4–154995–0564
WRI (World Resources Institute) (2019) 17 countries, home to one quarter of the world’s population, face extremely high water stress. Wri.org/aqueduct
Zaczek J, Porowski A (2017) Hydrogeological settings and origin of groundwater composition in the southern part of the Gorce MTS, Kowaniec Maly catchment. Annales Societatis GeologorumPoloniae 87:183–197
Zammouri M, Ounaies S, Jarraya-Horriche F (2006) Modélisation de la recharge artificielle par lâchers dans le lit d’un cours d’eau. Cas de la plaine d’Enfida (Tunisie). Las aguassubterraineas en los paisemediterraneos. InstitutoGeologico y Minero de Espana.Serie :Hidrogeologica y AguasSubterraneas 17 : 407–412
Zammouri M, Jarraya-Horriche F, OumaroOdo B ,Benabdallah S (2013) Assessment of the effect of a planned marina on groundwater quality in Enfida plain (Tunisia). Arab J. Geosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0814-0
Zouaidi M (2019) Caractérisation du système aquifère dans la région d’Enfidha (Centre Est de la Tunisie): Apports de la géophysique et des données de forages. Mastère. Université de Tunis, Tunis
Acknowledgements
Authors like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive remarks.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Anis Chekirbane
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Water Quality, Global Changes and Groundwater Responses
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zouaidi, M., Guellala, R., Frigui, M. et al. Determination of zones suitable for the exploitation of the Oued Khairat aquifer (Tunisian Sahel). Arab J Geosci 16, 89 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-023-11187-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-023-11187-6