Abstract
In this study, the activity concentrations of natural radionuclides in soil and beach sediment samples collected from 15 randomly but uniformly distributed locations in the coastal area of Akwa Ibom (southern Nigeria) were measured using hyper pure germanium (HPGe) detector. The activity concentrations of 238U, 232Th and 40K varied from 9 to 44 Bq/kg, 3 to 72 Bq/kg and 35 to 250 Bq/kg respectively. These results are below the 1000, 1000 and 4000 Bq/kg upper limits of safety for 238U, 232Th and 40K respectively. Except 238U, 232Th and 40K show lower standard deviations than their mean values, which indicate that soils and sediments have high degree of uniformity. The spatial distribution of radionuclide concentrations is nearly uniform except at locations where carbonaceous materials and clay soils exist. Mean value of Th/U ratio across the area was ≤ 7, typical of reducing condition in the depositional environment, thus suggesting enrichment of carbonaceous materials and clays. Additionally, the concentration of 40K was observed to be slightly higher in locations where anthropic activities are prevalent. Apart from excess lifetime cancer risk (average concentration of 0.80 × 10−3), the average concentrations of other radiological parameters: radium equivalent (83 Bq/kg), absorbed dose rate (39 nGy/h), indoor annual effective dose equivalent (0.18 mSv/year), outdoor annual effective dose equivalent (0.05 mSv/y) and annual gonadal dose equivalent (259 μSv/y), are below permissible limits. Hence, the soils and sediments are safe and suitable for all purposes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Radioactivity from radionuclides such as 238U, 232Th and 40K and their decay products present in soils and rocks have over time posed serious environmental hazard to both man and a variety of animal species in their natural environments. Uranium and thorium series progenies (i.e., 226Ra, 222Rn 218Po, 214Pb, 214Bi and 214Po) and (i.e., 228Ra, 220Rn 216Po, 212Pb, 212Bi and 212Po) respectively, and 40K are the most concerned. Studies have shown that about 96% of the total radiation received on the earth surface originates from natural sources, while about 4% is emitted by artificial sources (Chougaonkar et al. 2003). Natural radionuclides that yield constant activity originate from terrestrial (e.g., weathering of granitic rocks) and cosmogenic sources (Nizam et al. 2013; Issa and Alaseri 2015; Khuntong et al. 2015). Thus, rock forming minerals contain radionuclides that are natural in origin (Szarlowicz et al. 2019). High radiation levels are attributable to the presence of some radionuclide-bearing accessory minerals, e.g., monazite, zircon, allanite, apatite, sphene, mica and feldspars (Kannan et al. 2002; Ramola et al. 2011; Hannan and Nguyen 2013; Sivakumar 2014); colloidal iron; and manganese oxides and hydroxides (McKee 2008; Jurina et al. 2013; Raghu et al. 2015; Akpan et al. 2016). Artificial radioactivity originates from anthropogenic activities such as nuclear weapon testing programmes and accidental discharge from nuclear power plants that release radionuclides into the environment. Also, excessive application of phosphate fertilizers in agricultural soils have been reported to cause increased artificial radioactivity in soils (Todorović et al. 2015). Additionally, increased activity concentration due to industrial activities such as heavy metal mining, oil exploitation, processing and transportation activities have also been reported (Carvalho et al. 2007, 2009; United Nations Environmental Programme, UNEP 2011). These activities are prevalent within the study area, hence, the need for routine assessment. Soils and sediments have been identified as potential repository for radionuclides and other types of contaminants (Szarlowicz et al. 2019). Accumulation of radionuclides in terrestrial-marine and marine environments portends grave danger to both aquatic and human health. Environmental factors such as soil redox potential, clay-sized soil fraction, degree of weathering, concentration of contaminants, organic matter content, pH, temperature fluxes and precipitation have been identified as elements that controls bioavailability, uptake and transfer of these radionuclides in soils and different food chains (Ribeiro et al. 2018; Saint-Fort 2018). These processes are governed by the physical and chemical characteristics of the ecosystem. However, the transfer mechanism of radionuclides into biological systems is analogous to how these systems obtain nutrient from soil, water and food (Saint-Fort 2018). When present in sediments, radionuclides pose exposure risk due to their increased mobility and high solubility (Nizam et al. 2013; Momčilović et al. 2013; Issa and Alaseri 2015; Ravisankar et al. 2015). Radionuclides are retained in soils, which serve as interface that connects other components of the physical environment such as air and water (Chen et al. 1999). Radionuclides in soils and sediments can be transmitted either directly or in solution to animals, plants and the other components of the environment through inhalation, injection and ingestion where it accumulates in the host to harmful levels (Binesh et al. 2010; Raghu et al. 2015). The risk factor due to radioactive decay of 238U and 232Th series including 40K is the release of gamma radiations that can pose external hazard to the surrounding or internal via inhalation and ingestion of radon and its decay products by man and biota (United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, UNSCEAR 1988; Khalifa and El Arabi 2005; Povinec and Hirose 2015). High incidences of some chronic diseases (e.g., lung and kidney cancers, acute leucopoenia and anaemia) have been attributed to ionizing radiations from radioisotopes (Taskin et al. 2009). More so, ionizing radiation can result in mutation due to destruction of DNA (Busby 2013).
Recently, studies on natural radionuclide origin and behaviour (Michalik et al. 2013; Bondareva et al. 2017; Szarlowicz et al. 2019), spatial distribution in soil, sediments, water and plants (El-Gamal et al. 2007; Manigandan and Manikandan 2008; Navas et al. 2011; Ćujić et al. 2015), food crops (Jibiri et al. 2007) and impact of phosphate ores and fertilizers on soils (El-Taher and Abdelhalim 2013; Hassan et al. 2017; Boumala et al. 2018; Bramki et al. 2018; Ugolini et al. 2020) have dominated many scientific fora. Reports of radionuclide enrichment in some sea foods and snails also exist (Musthafa and Krishnamoorthy 2012; Manigandan et al. 2015). Smičiklas and Šljivić-Ivanović (2016) assessed radioactive contaminants in soils and suggested possible remediation strategies such as stabilization and chemical extraction techniques. Research show that beach sediments and sands often used in building houses contain certain levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials resulting from primordial radionuclide of cosmic origin (UNSCEAR 1982; Powell et al. 2007; Newman et al. 2008). Activity concentration of natural radionuclide in soils and sediments is dependent on rock type from which these materials occurred prior to weathering (Ravisankar et al. 2015). Issa and Alaseri (2015) reported that activity concentration of radionuclide in building materials could be of geologic origin and can also result from geochemical alterations of those materials. Radiological assessment of activity concentration is essential for monitoring and evaluating radioactive hazards, setting standards and guidelines necessary for environmental management and remediation (Porcelli and Baskaran 2011). An understanding of the abundance of radionuclides in marine sediments is useful in determining source of sediments, dynamics, transport mechanism and environmental reconstruction (Sondi et al. 1995; Baggoura 1997; Powell et al. 2007; Matisoff 2014). It can also be used to assess radiation risk on those who make their living around the beach and the rural dwellers that make contact with these sediments on a daily basis. Several researchers have devoted interest in the investigation of natural radioisotopes in coastal sediments (Amekudzie et al. 2011; Tari et al. 2013; SureshGandhi et al. 2014; Ravisankar et al. 2015; Issa and Alaseri 2015; ). Reconnaissance investigations have been conducted in coastal, terrestrial-marine and marine environments to quantify the spatial variability of radionuclides in sands in India (Kannan et al. 2002; Sivakumar 2014; Raghu et al. 2015), Nigeria (Tchokossa et al. 2012; Akpan et al. 2016) and China (Lu et al. 2008; Wang et al. 2011). However, investigation of this sort has not been conducted around the Akwa Ibom coastline. The aim of this study is to assess the activity levels and radiologic effects resulting from exposure to radionuclides present in coastal soils and sediments of Akwa Ibom, southern Nigeria.
Physiography and geology
Site description
The study area is located between longitudes 7° 30′ and 8° 30′ E and latitudes 4° 25′ and 4° 40′ N of the equator along the coastline of Akwa Ibom, southern Nigeria. Five coastal enclaves comprising Oron, Eket, Ibeno, Eastern Obolo and Ikot Abasi were covered in the study (Fig. 1). The area is within the equatorial climatic zone that is characterized by two seasons—rainy (March–October) and dry (November–February). The dry season usually begins with gradual reduction in rainfall intensity occasioned by the arrival of a southward heading Sahara Desert-borne tropical continental air mass, which blows across the area. The rainy season normally starts when the northward heading moisture-laden trans-Atlantic air mass blows cross the area. Generally, the area around these coastal communities consists of beach ridge complexes, mangrove swamps of southern Nigeria and landward, gently undulating coastal plain. The beach ridge complex forms parts of the agricultural lands reserved for farming by the local people. Within the farming areas, varieties of crops and vegetables are cultivated biannually and both organic and inorganic chemicals (mainly nitrogeneous fertilizers), and herbicides are applied sometimes to enhance soil fertility and crop yield. Besides farming, the area is the hub of oil exploration, exploitation and refining activities and these anthropic activities have resulted in serious environmental challenges leading to increased activity concentration in soils (UNEP 2011). Other prevailing human activities, which can also enhance heavy metal and radionuclide concentrations in beach sediments, include marine transportation, fishing, mining and boat making (Tam and Wong 2000; Li et al. 2007; Ravisankar et al. 2015).
Geology
The study area is composed of Late Tertiary-Holocene sediments. The coastal and border-lines of the estuaries and rivers like Qua Iboe and Imo are surrounded by alluvial sediments that connect the river bodies with the Coastal Plain Sands in the off-coast areas. These bank sediments consist mainly of clays, silts and silty-sands that are fine to medium and well sorted. Farther away from the coast, the sedimentary succession grades into the Coastal Plain Sands. Basically, the sediment characteristics determine the nature of soils and are primarily influenced by environmental factors such as climatic conditions, topography and land use practices. Soils in the area are fragile, acidic and low in native fertility and are classified based on taxonomy into entisols and inceptisols (Udoh et al. 2013). At some isolated locations some distance away from the beach mouth but far removed from the hinterland, abundant deposits of shales, limestones and gravels exist. The general characteristics of the sediments in terms of colour is white and indicates the abundance of monocrystalline quartzitic minerals. However, in some areas especially zones of terrigeous influxes, sediments are dominantly grayish, probably due to the prevalence of oxidation-reduction reactions (Stein et al. 1996; Johnston et al. 2010). Organic debris transported and deposited by tidal and flooding activities around rivers and streams, also results in the darkening of coastal sediments. Blackening of sediments is typically the character of zircon- and monazite-enriched terrigeneous sediments. Comparatively, monazite has large concentrations of 232Th and 238U and lower amounts of 40K (Alam et al. 1999; Mohanty et al. 2004; Abdel-Halim and Saleh 2016). The bottom sediments are characterized by sand fractions of biogenic provenance as indicated by their characteristic low organic carbon contents (Martins et al. 2012; Avinash et al. 2016). These processes including chemical composition of sediments, physical parameters such as grain size, sediment stack height and soil/sediment type, and anthropogenic activities can influence the distribution and concentration of radionuclides in coastal sediments.
Materials and methods
Sampling and sample preparation
Composite sediment samples were collected from 15 locations along the Akwa Ibom coastal area in the late dry to early rainy seasons (January–April) of 2016 using plastic spatula. This sampling period was considered optimal because loose sediments transported by surface run-off and deposited in the area might have settled by the period of sampling and thus, exist in their true ecological and textural conditions (Raghu et al. 2015). In each LGA, three samples comprising sandy and argilaceous (fine sand and clay) materials were collected. The plastic spatula used in collecting the samples was always washed and dried before use in other locations. Before sampling, the upper 1 cm of the soil/sediment dominated by materials such as dead leaves and wood fragments was removed and samples were collected within the upper 2 cm soil layer since most anthropogenic and other biogenic contaminants settle within this depth (Krishna and Govil 2007). At each sampling site, a hand-held Garmin global position system, GPSmap76 model was used in measuring geographic coordinates. The samples were stored in black polyethylene bags and later transported to the laboratory. The soils and sediments were oven dried at a temperature of 120 °C to remove moisture and later pulverized using mortar and pestle. The soil samples were seived using a 200-mm mesh in order to remove wood fragments, high angularity components like stones, pebbles and other macro-materials.
The samples were hermetically stored in labelled cylindrical containers with dimensions of about 6.5 cm (diameter) and 3.5 cm (height). Other information captured on the containers include date of acquisition, name and position coordinate of sampling site and net weight. The containers were tightly sealed and left for 4 weeks so that 226Ra and 228Ra and their short-lived daughters can attain secular radioactive equilibrium. Under this condition of secular equilibrium, the activity concentration of 226Ra corresponds to the activity concentration of 238U (Bochiolo et al. 2012). All measurements were performed using a p-type coaxial hyper pure germanium gamma ray detector available at the National Institute of Radiation Protection and Research, University of Ibadan, Nigeria. The measuring system has low background shield, 25% efficiency and 2 keV resolution at 1332 keV gamma line of 60Co. The energy efficiency of the detector was determined by first counting and analysing the activities of various multi-gamma radiation emitting standard sources (e.g., 241Am, 109Cd, 60Co, 139Ce, 88Y and potassium chloride standard solution) with energies between 60 and 1836 keV in equivalent geometry. The spectrum of the gamma rays was recorded using a PC-based 8192 channel analyser and processed using Genie-2000 software (Canberra, USA). Self absorption and coincidence summing corrections were performed using the Laboratory Sourceless Calibration System (LabSOCS) incorporated into the Genie-2000 software. The Geometry Composer tool in the software was used during sample geometry modelling and efficiency calibration file generation. The efficiency for the specified energies were estimated by LabSOCS based on Monte Carlo N-Particle modelling code after physical parameters such as sample container, absorber matrix and specific source-to-detector distance have been specified.
The samples were placed in the detector and counted independently for a minimum period of 1 day (86,400 s). The activities of primordial radionuclides were determined from the gamma ray 609 keV line from 214Bi peak, while 232Th was computed from 911 keV gamma radiation from 228Ac. The activity of 40K was evaluated from the peak energy of 1461 keV from 40K. The specific activities of the various radionuclides in each sample were obtained from the net counts at peak emissions by removing background counts and correcting for photopeak efficiency, gamma intensity of the radionuclide and weight of the sample (Kannan et al. 2002). The activity concentration of the radionuclides in each sample, A (Bq/kg), was obtained from Eq. 1
where \( \frac{N_s}{t_s} \) and \( \frac{N_b}{t_s} \) are counts per second of radionuclide in the sample and radionuclide in the background respectively, Pγ is the number of gamma radiations per disintegration of the nuclide at energy E (i.e., the emission probability of gamma decay), ts is the counting time in seconds, ε(E) is the full energy peak efficiency, Ksc is the cascade summing correction, Ksa is the correction factor for self attenuation, Kdc is the decay correction factor and Ms is the mass of the sample (kg). The values of the various radiological parameters were determined by computation from the observed activities of radionuclides.
Results and discussion
Activity concentrations of 238U, 232Th and 40K in beach sediments
The spatial distribution of activity levels of the primordial radionuclides (238U, 232Th and 40K) in coastal soils and beach sediments along Akwa Ibom Coastlnie is shown in Fig. 2, while the box-whisker plot (Fig. 3) shows the basic statistical description of the radionuclides and radiologic parameters (Table 1). Activity concentrations of 40K, with respective minimum and maximum concentrations of 35 ± 8 Bq/kg at Eket III and 250 ± 6 Bq/kg at Eastern Obolo II (average of 145 ± 6 Bq/kg), is the highest for all the radionuclides (Fig. 2). The range of activity concentrations for 232Th is from 3 ± 1 Bq/kg at Eket I to 72 ± 9 Bk/kg at Ibeno I (average of 36 ± 2 Bq/kg). Activity concentrations of 238U vary between 9 ± 1 Bq/kg (Ibeno II) and 44 ± 6 Bq/kg (Eastern Obolo I) (average of 23 ± 3 Bq/kg) (Fig. 2). The average abundances of 238U and 40K are comparatively lower than world average values of 30 and 400 Bq/kg, respectively, while 232Th was slightly higher than the worldwide average of 35 Bq/kg (UNSCEAR 2000). However, activity levels of 238U in most clays (e.g., Ibeno III and Eastern Obolo I) are higher than the world average. Similarly, activity levels of 232Th exceed the world average at Oron II, Ibeno I, and III, Eastern Obolo I and Ikot Abasi II. Generally, activity concentrations of radionuclides in the area increased southwards, towards the Atlantic Ocean (Fig. 2). Results of activity concentrations obtained from this investigation were compared with UNSCEAR (2000) and results from other countries (Table 2). These results portray the beach sediments as originating from migmatic rocks like granites, rhyolites, andesites and pegmatites, which were weathered, transported and deposited at their present location (Chabaux et al. 2003; Ӧrgün et al. 2007). Granitic and metamorphic rocks occur extensively in the adjoining Precambrian Oban Massif and can be the provenance of these sediments (Rahaman et al. 1981; Okpara et al. 2014).
Along the coastline, radionclide distribution is not even but rather vary widely with spatial location (Fig. 2), geology and probably the extent of antropogenic activity (El Mamoney and Khater 2004; Akpan et al. 2016). The pattern of 40K and 232Th enrichments show that both radionuclides are closely related to sediment type. Around the river bank, where organic matter-enriched sediments (clays and fine sands) are dominant, relatively high 40K activity concentrations were observed (Fig. 2). The increasing abundance of 40K along the east and east-western portions suggests that their enrichments may be associated with anthropic activities such as hydrocarbon exploitation activities, industrial wastewater disposal, oil spillage and marine transportation. The basic statistical description of radionuclide enrichment pattern (Table 1) indicates that the standard deviations of 232Th (28.78) and 40K (71.29) are lower than their mean values of 36 ± 2 and 145 ± 6 Bq/kg respectively, while that of 238U (29.67) was observed to be slightly higher than its mean value of 23 ± 3 Bq/kg. These observations indicate that the concentration of radionuclides in soils and sediments have high degree of uniformity in terms of 232Th and 40K activity concentrations and low degree of uniformity with respect to 238U distribution (Gupta 2001). The low degree of uniformity could be due to clay soils, which show high mean activity concentration (2.52 ppm) of 238U and Th/U ratio of ~ 7.0 (Table 3) typical of marine sediment (Klaja and Dudek 2016). Additionally, the low uniformity (i.e., measure of spatial variation of the activity concentration) of 238U represented by the large value of standard deviation than the mean indicates the influence of physical and geochemical processes on the accumulation of radionuclides in the sediments. Although these sediments were sampled spatially, there exists strong affinity with regard to time of deposition. Skewness is a measure of asymmetry or lack of symmetry in the shape of a frequency distribution (Ravisankar et al. 2015). The peak of a frequency distribution can be positively or negatively skewed (Gupta 2001). 238U and 232Th radionuclides were positively skewed, which indicates that their distributions are asymmetric. However, 40K displayed lack of symmetry due to its negative skewness. The kurtosis procedure that measures the peakedness of the curve and consequently internal sorting or distribution of the data was employed. Zero value of kurtosis represents normal curve or mesokurtic distribution. Positive values indicate more peaked normal curve or leptokurtic distribution, while negative values (i.e., less normal curve) represent platykurtic distribution (Gupta 2001). It was observed from the study that the distribution pattern of 238U is leptokurtic, while 232Th and 40K followed a platykurtic pattern.
Relative abundance or depletion of radionuclides in the sediments, assessed using Th/U ratios, was employed in the study to assess the content of organic matter present in the sediments. The mean value of Th/U ratio across the area is ≤ 7 indicating that the depositional environment is in a reducing condition (Klaja and Dudek 2016). This observation suggests enrichment of carbonaceous materials and clays in the area (Aswathanarayana 1985; Bodin et al. 2011). These results correlate well with U/Th and U/K ranges of sedimentary rocks as reported by Galbraith and Saunders (1983).
Radium equivalent activity
Radium equivalent activity (Raeq) was used in estimating the amount of radiation hazard in sediments from net activities of 238U, 232Th and 40K (Beretka and Mathew 1985). Raeq was computed using Eq. 2
where ARa, ATh and AK are the net activity concentrations in Bq/kg of 238U, 232Th and 40K respectively. Radiation risk assessed using Raeq procedure is externally attributed to gamma radiations and internally to radon and its progenies (UNSCEAR 2000). Studies have shown that 238U, 232Th and 40K emit γ-dose at different rates even when present in the same amount in sediments (Raghu et al. 2015). It was assumed from Eq. 2 that 370 Bq/kg of 238U, 259 Bq/kg of 232Th and 4810 Bq/kg of 40K produced γ-radiation doses at equal rate and radioactive equilibrium was uniquely attained in the 238U and 232Th series (Yu et al. 1992). Raeq observations in the study area (Figs. 3 and 4) range from 19 Bq/kg in Eket I to 170 Bq/kg in Ibeno I (average of 83 Bq/kg). This average is far below the permissible limit of 370 Bq/kg that is equivalent to an external dose of 1.5 mSv/year. Hence, these sediments cannot pose significant radiation hazards to the environment.
Absorbed dose rate
Absorbed gamma dose rate, DR (nGy/h) at a distance of 1 m above the ground, is the amount of energy received from ionizing radiations absorbed per unit mass per unit time from matter (Raghu et al. 2015). The contributions of natural specific activities of 238U, 232Th and 40K account for the total absorbed dose rate in air. There exist a direct relationship between radionuclide concentrations in beach sediments and terrestrial gamma radiation. Neglecting contributions from other radionuclides such as 235U and its progenies, 137Cr and 90Sr, since their total contributions are negligibly small, the outdoor air-absorbed dose rate resulting from terrestrial gamma radiations at 1 m above ground surface due to 238U, 232Th and 40K was calculated from Eq. 3
where 0.462, 0.0604 and 0.042 are dose conversion factors used in transforming the activity concentrations of 238U, 232Th and 40K to their equivalent dose rates in nGy/h per Bq/kg (UNSCEAR 2000). DR observations in the study area range between 10 nGy/h around Eket Beach I and 75 nGy/h in Ibeno Beach I (average of 39 nGy/h). These DR observations are far below the safe limit, and the average value is 29% lower than the UNSCEAR (2000) stipulated safety standard value of 55 nGy/h.
Annual effective dose equivalent
The annual effective dose equivalent, AEDE (mSv/year), was computed based on the UNSCEAR (2000) standards, which stipulate that adults spend average of 20% of their time outdoor and so are exposed to air outside their living houses. The conversion coefficient from the absorbed dose in air was set at 0.7 Sv/Gy, while outdoor occupancy factor of 0.2 was used in converting dose rate to annual effective dose. The indoor and outdoor AEDE were determined from the computed values of DR using equations 4 and 5 respectively as
where 8760 h is the total time (in hours) in 1 year. Observed minimum and maximum values of AEDEindoor were 0.04 mSv/y at Eket I and 0.32 mSv/y at Ibeno III (average of 0.18 mSv/y) respectively. Corresponding values of AEDEoutdoor were 0.01 mSv/y at Eket I and 0.08 mSv/y at Ibeno I and III (average of 0.05 mSv/y) respectively. These values are lower than the 1 mSv/y benchmark value stipulated by UNSCEAR (2000). Thus, the results suggest that the environment is safe for habitation.
Annual gonadal dose equivalent
According to UNSCEAR (2010), the thyroid, lungs, bone marrow and surface, gonads and female breast constitute sensitive organs of interest in radiation studies. This is because these organs, in addition to their ability to store radionuclides, are usually the most affected parts of the body when exposed to ionizing radiations. The concept of annual gonadal dose equivalent (AGDE) was introduced by UNSCEAR for use in measuring the genetic significance of the total doses of radiation received by the reproductive organs in a year. Hence, the specific activities of 226Ra, 232Th and 40K was used in assessing the effects of radiation on these sensitive organs of mammalian body. Thus, AGDE was estimated using Eq. 6
Results obtained vary from 62 μSv/y obtained at Eket 1 to 450 μSv/y at Ibeno III (average of 259 μSv/y). The average observation is less than the recommended permissible limit of 300 μSv/y for soils (Zaidi et al. 1999) suggesting that these organs are not susceptible to being exposed to ionizing radiations. However, due to the high sensitivity of these organs and their capacities to continuously store small amounts of the radionuclides, the radionuclides can accumulate and their effects can manifest strongly later in life. This study reveals that the effects of natural radiation on sensitive organs of mammals within the coastal area are negligible. Comparatively, the average AGDE observed in this study is less than the results of other researchers like the 2398 μSv/y obtained by Arafa (2004) in Eastern Desert (Egypt) and 550.5 μSv/y obtained by Kurnaz et al. (2007) in Rize (Turkey).
Excess lifetime cancer risk
The excess lifetime cancer risk, ELCR, was evaluated using Eq. 7 (Taskin et al. 2009),
where AEDE is the total annual effective dose rate in mSv/y (estimated by adding AEDEindoor and AEDEoutdoor), LD is the lifetime duration (70 years) and RF is the risk factor in per sievert. For random effects, the International Commission for Radiological Protection stipulates a value of 0.05 for RF (also called fatal cancer risk per sievert) for the public (Taskin et al. 2009). ELCR observations vary from 0.19 × 10−3 at Eket I to 1.39 × 10−3 at Ibeno III. Average ELCR was observed to be 0.80 × 10−3, which is higher than the world average (0.29 × 10−3) reported by UNSCEAR (2010) and Taskin et al. (2009). These results reveal that cancer risk increases with exposure time.
Conclusion
The concentrations of primordial radionuclides in soils and sediments of Akwa Ibom coastal area varied from 9 to 44 (average of 25.46 Bq/kg) for 238U, 3 to 72 Bq/kg (average of 34.52 Bq/kg) for 232Th and 35 to 250 Bq/kg (average of 145 Bq/kg) for 40K. These results were below the 1000, 1000 and 4000 Bq/kg upper limits of safety for 238U, 232Th and 40K respectively. 232Th and 40K, except 238U, show lower standard deviation than their mean, which indicates that soils and sediments have high degree of uniformity. Their distributions were nearly uniform; although the concentrations of 40K were relatively high in areas where anthropogenic activities like marine transport, hydrocarbon exploitation are prevalent hence, suggesting the contribution of these activities to radionuclide enrichment within the area. At some locations in Ibeno and Eastern Obolo 238U activity concentration levels of clays were comparatively high, compared with their proportion in other locations and were also higher than the worldwide average. Relative abundance or depletion of radionuclides in the sediments show the mean value of Th/U ratio across the area to be ≤ 7 typical of reducing condition of depositional environment, thus suggesting enrichment of carbonaceous materials and clays. Except excess lifetime cancer risk, where average value (0.80 × 10−3) is higher than world average value of 0.29 × 10−3, average values of radiological parameters: radium equivalent (83 Bq/kg), absorbed dose rate (39 nGy/h), indoor annual effective dose equivalent (0.18 mSv/y), outdoor annual effective dose equivalent (0.05 mSv/y) and annual gonadal dose equivalent (259 μSv/y) were below international limits. These results show that the beach sediments are safe and thus, suitable for building residential places and other civil structures.
References
Abdel-Halim AA, Saleh IH (2016) Radiological characterization of beach sediments along the Alexandria–Rosetta coasts of Egypt. J Taibah Univ Sci 10:212–220
Akpan AE, Paul ND, Uwah EJ (2016) Ground radiometric investigation of natural radiation levels and their radiological effects in Akpabuyo, Nigeria. J Afr Earth Sci 123:185–192
Alam MN, Miah MMH, Chowdhury MI, Kamal M, Ghose S, Islam MN, Mustafa MN, Miah MSR (1999) Radiation dose estimation from the radioactivity analysis of lime and cement used Bangladesh. J Environ Radioact 42:77–85
Amekudzie A, Emi-Reynolds G, Faanu A, Darko EO, Awudu AR, Adukpo Y, Quaye LAN, Kpordzro R, Agyemang B, Ibrahim A (2011) Natural radioactivity concentrations and dose assessment in shore sediments along the coast of Greater Accra, Ghana. World Appl Sci J 13(11):2338–2343
Arafa W (2004) Specific activity and hazards of granite samples collected from the Eastern Desert of Egypt. J Environ Radioact 75:315–327
Aswathanarayana U (1985) Principles of nuclear geology. Ozonian Press Pvt Ltd, New Delhi, pp 85–87
Avinash K, Kurian PJ, Warrier AK, Shankar R, Vineesh TC, Ravindra R (2016) Sedimentary sources and processes in the eastern Arabian Sea: insights from environmental magnetism, geochemistry and clay mineralogy. Geosci Front 7(2):253–264
Baggoura NB (1997) Plutonium isotopes, 137Cs, 90Sr and natural radioactivity in marine sediments from Ghazaouet (Algeria). J Environ Radioact 34(2):127–138
Beretka J, Mathew PJ (1985) Natural radioactivity of Australian building materials, industrial wastes and by-products. Health Physics 48:87–95
Benamar MA, Zerrouki A, Idiri Z, Tobbeche S (1997) Natural and artificial radioactivity levels in sediments in Algiers bay. Applied Radiation and Isotopes 48(8):1161–1164
Binesh A, Mohammadi S, Mowlavi AA, Parvaresh P (2010) Evaluation of the radiation dose from radon ingestion and inhalation in drinking water. Int J Water Resour Environ Eng 2(7):174–178
Bochiolo M, Verdoya M, Chiozzi P, Pasquale V (2012) Radiometric surveying for the assessment of radiation dose and radon specific exhalation in underground environment. J Appl Geophys 83:100–106
Bodin S, Fröhlich S, Boutib L, Lahsini S, Redfern J (2011) Assessment of early Toarcian Source-rock potential in the Central High-Atlas Basin (Central Morocco): Regional Distribution and Depositional model. J Pet Geol 34:345–364
Bondareva L, Rakitskii V, Tananaev I (2017) The behaviour of natural and artificial radionuclides in a river system: the Yenisei River, Russia as a case study. Water Quality, 361p
Boumala D, Mavon C, Belafrites A, Tedjani A, Groetz JE (2018) Evaluation of radionuclide concentrations and external gamma radiation levels in phosphate ores and fertilizers commonly used in Algeria. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 317(1):501–510
Bramki A, Ramdhane M, Benrachi F (2018) Natural radioelement concentrations in fertilizers and the soil of the Mila region of Algeria. J Radiat Res Appl Sci 11(1):49–55
Busby C (2013) Aspects of DNA damage from internal radionuclides. In: New Research Directions in DNA Repair. IntechOpen
Carvalho FP, Madruga MJ, Reis MC, Alves JG, Oliveira JM, Gouveia J, Silva L (2007) Radioactivity in the environment around past radium and uranium mining sites of Portugal. J Environ Radioact 96:39–46
Carvalho FP, Oliveira JM, Malta M (2009) Analyses of radionuclides in soil, water, and agriculture products near the Urgeiriça uranium mine in Portugal. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 281:479–484
Chabaux F, Riotte J, Dequincey O (2003) U–Th–Ra fractionation during weathering and river transport. In: Bourdon B, Henderson GM, Lundstrom CC, Turner SP (Eds.), Uranium-Series Geochemistry. Rev Mineral Geochem 52:533–576
Chen TB, Wong JWC, Zhou HY, Wong MH (1999) Assessment of trace metal distribution and contamination in surface soils of Hong Kong. Environ Pollut 96(1):61–68
Chougaonkar MP, Eppen KP, Ramachandran TV (2003) Profiles of doses to population living in the high background radiation areas in Kerala. J Environ Radioact 71:275–297
Ćujić M, Dragović S, Đorđević M, Dragović R, Gajić B, Miljanić Š (2015) Radionuclides in the soil around the largest coal-fired power plant in Serbia: radiological hazard, relationship with soil characteristics and spatial distribution. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(13):10317–10330
Doretti L, Ferrara D, Barison G, Gerbasi R, Battiston G (1992) Natural radionuclides in the muds and waters used in thermal therapy in Abano Terme, Italy. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 45 (1/4):175–178
El Mamoney MH, Khater AEM (2004) Environmental characterization and radio-ecological impacts of non-nuclear industries on the Red Sea coast. J Environ Radioact 73:151–168
El-Gamal A, Nasr S, El-Taher A (2007) Study of the spatial distribution of natural radioactivity in the upper Egypt Nile River sediments. Radiat Meas 42(3):457–465
El-Taher A, Abdelhalim MAK (2013) Elemental analysis of phosphate fertilizer consumed in Saudi Arabia. Life Sci J 10:701–708
Florou H, Kritidis P (1992) Gamma radiation measurements and dose rate in the coastal areas of a volcanic island, Aegean Sea, Greece. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 45(1–4):277–279
Galbraith JH, Saunders DF (1983) Rock classification by characteristics of aerial gamma-ray measurements. J Geochem Explor 18(1):49–73
Gupta SP (2001) Statistical methods. New Delhi, Sultan Chand & Sons, Educational Publishers
Hannan MA, Nguyen NMR (2013) Natural radioactivity and its gamma dose rate in mission (Texas) soils. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 295(1):729–736
Hassan N M, Chang BU, Tokonami S (2017) Comparison of natural radioactivity of commonly used fertilizer materials in Egypt and Japan. J Chem
Issa SAM, Alaseri SM (2015) Determination of natural radioactivity and associated radiological risk in building materials used in Tabuk Area, Saudi Arabia. Int J Adv Sci Technol 82:45–62
Jibiri NN, Farai IP, Alausa SK (2007) Activity concentrations of 226Ra, 228Th, and 40K in different food crops from a high background radiation area in Bitsichi, Jos Plateau, Nigeria. Radiat Environ Biophys 46(1):53–59
Johnston DT, Poulton SW, Dehler C, Porter S, Husson J, Canfield DE, Knoll AH (2010) An emerging picture of Neoproterozoic ocean chemistry: insights from the Chuar Group, Grand Canyon, USA. Earth Planet Sci Lett 290(1-2):64–73
Jurina I, Ivanić M, Troskot-Čorbić T, Barišić D, Vdović N, Sondi I (2013) Activity concentrations and distribution of radionuclides in surface and core sediments of the Neretva Channel (Adriatic Sea, Croatia). Geol Croat 66(2):143–150
Kannan V, Rajan MP, Iyengar MAR, Ramesh R (2002) Distribution of natural and anthropogenic radionuclides in soil and beach sand samples of Kalpakkam (India) using hyper pure germanium (HPGe) gamma ray spectrometry. Appl Radiat Isot 57:109–119
Khalifa NA, El Arabi AM (2005) Natural radioactivity in farm soil and phosphate fertilizer and its environmental implications in Qena Governorate, Upper Egypt. J Environ Radioact 84(1):51–64
Khuntong S, Phaophang C, Sudprasert W (2015) Assessment of radionuclides and heavy metals in marine sediments along the Upper Gulf of Thailand. In J Phys Conf Ser 611(1) p. 012023). IOP Publishing.
Klaja J, Dudek L (2016) Geological interpretation of spectral gamma ray (SGR) logging in selected boreholes. Nafta-Gaz 1:3–14
Krishna AK, Govil PK (2007) Soil contamination due to heavy metals from an industrial area of Surat, Gujarat, Western India. Environ Monit Assess 124:263–275
Kurnaz A, Küçükӧmeroğlu B, Keser R, Okumusoglu NT, Korkmaz F, Karahan G, Çevik U (2007) Determination of radioactivity levels and hazards of soil and sediment samples in Fırtına Valley (Rize, Turkey). Appl Radiat Isot 65:1281–1289
Li QS, Wu ZF, Chu B, Zhang N, Cai SS, Fang JH (2007) Heavy metals in coastal wetland sediments of the Pearl River Estuary, China. Environ Pollut 149:158–164
Lozano JC, Rodríguez PB, Tomé FV (2002) Distribution of long-lived radionuclides of the 238U series in the sediments of a small river in a uranium mineralized region of Spain. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 63(2):153–171
Lu X, Zhang X, Wang F (2008) Natural radioactivity in sediment in Wei River, China. Environ Geol 58(7):1475–1481
Manigandan PK, Manikandan NM (2008) Migration of radionuclide in soil and plants in the Western Ghats environment. Iran J Radiat Res 6(1):7–112
Manigandan PK, Shekar BC, Khanna D (2015) Root uptake/foliar uptake in a natural ecosystem. In: Radionuclides in the Environment. Springer International Publishing, p 133-146
Martins R, Azevedo MR, Mamede R, Sousa B, Freitas R, Rocha F et al (2012) Sedimentary and geochemical characterization and provenance of the Portuguese continental shelf soft-bottom sediments. J Mar Syst 91(1):41–52
Matisoff G (2014) 210Pb as a tracer of soil erosion, sediment source area identification and particle transport in the terrestrial environment. J Environ Radioact 138:343–354
McKee BA (2008) U- and Th-series nuclides in estuarine environments. In: Krishnaswami S, Cochran JK (eds) U-Th series nuclides in aquatic systems. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 193–225
Michalik B, Brown J, Krajewski P (2013) The fate and behaviour of enhanced natural radioactivity with respect to environmental protection. Environ Impact Assess Rev 38:163–171
Mohanty AK, Sengupta D, Dasb SK, Vijayanc V, Sahab SK (2004) Natural radioactivity in the newly discovered high background radiation area on the eastern coast of Orissa, (India). Radiat Meas 38:153–165
Momčilović M, Kovačević J, Tanić M, Đorđević M, Bačić G, Dragović S (2013) Distribution of natural radionuclides in surface soils in the vicinity of abandoned uranium mines in Serbia. Environ Monit Assess 185(2):1319–1329
Musthafa MS, Krishnamoorthy R (2012) Estimation of 210Po and 210Pb and its dose to human beings due to consumption of marine species of Ennore Creek, South India. J Environ Monit Assess 184(10):6253–6260
Navas A, Gaspar L, López-Vicente M, Machín J (2011) Spatial distribution of natural and artificial radionuclides at the catchment scale (South Central Pyrenees). Radiat Meas 46(2):261–269
Newman RT, Lindsay R, Maphoto KP, Mlwilo NA, Mohanty AK, Roux DG, de Meijer RJ, Hlatshwayo IN (2008) Determination of soil, sand and ore primordial radionuclide concentrations by full-spectrum analyses of high-purity germanium detector spectra. Appl Radiat Isot 66(6-7):855–859
Nizam QMR, Ginnah MA, Rahman MM, Kamal M, Chowdhury MI (2013) Assessment of activity concentrations of radionuclides from upper level sediment in Charfassion Island, Bhola, Bangladesh. J Nucl Part Phys 3(3):36–39
Okpara KD, Obioha YE, Onyekuru SO, Okereke C, Ibeneme SI (2014) Petrology and geochemistry of Basement Complex rocks in Okom-Ita Area, Oban Massif, southeastern Nigeria. Int J Geosci 5:394–407
Ӧrgün Y, Altınsoy N, Şahin SY, Karacik Z (2007) Natural and anthropogenic radionuclides in rocks and beach sands from Ezine region (Ҫanakkale), Western Anatolia, Turkey. J Appl Radiat Isotopes 65:739–747
Porcelli D, Baskaran M (2011) An overview of isotope geochemistry in environmental studies. In: Baskaran M (ed) Handbook of environmental isotope geochemistry. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 11–33
Povinec PP, Hirose K (2015) Fukushima radionuclides in the NW Pacific, and assessment of doses for Japanese and world population from ingestion of seafood. Sci Rep 5:9016
Powell BA, Hughes LD, Soreefan AM, Falta D, Wall M, DeVol TA (2007) Elevated concentrations of primordial radionuclides in sediments from the Reedy River and surrounding creeks in Simpsonville, South Carolina. J Environ Radioact 94(3):121–128
Raghu Y, Harikrishnan N, Chandrasekaran A, Ravisankar R (2015) Assessment of natural radioactivity and associated radiation hazards in some building materials used in Kilpenathur, Tiruvannamalai District, Tamilnadu, India. Afr J Basic Appl Sci 7(1):16–25
Rahaman MA, Ukpong EES, Azmatullah M (1981) Geology of parts of the Oban Massif southeastern Nigeria. J Min Geol 18:60–65
Ramola RC, Choubey VM, Ganesh P, Gusain GS, Tlosheva Z, Kies A (2011) Radionuclides analysis in the soil of Kumaun Himalayas, India, using gamma ray spectrometry. Curr Sci 100(6):906–914
Ravisankar R, Chandramohan J, Chandrasekaran A, Jebakumar JPP, Vijayalakshmi I, Vijayagopal P, Venkatraman B (2015) Assessments of radioactivity concentration of natural radionuclides and radiological hazard indices in sediment samples from the East coast of Tamilnadu, India with statistical approach. Mar Pollut Bull 97(1-2):419–430
Ribeiro FCA, Lauria D, Rodrigues JI, Lima SE, Sobrinho NM, Pérez DV (2018) Baseline and quality reference values for natural radionuclides in soils of Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil Revisita Brasileira Ciencia do Solo 1-15
Saint-Fort R (2018) Understanding sorption behavior and properties of radionuclides in the environment. Principles and applications in nuclear engineering: radiation effects, thermal hydraulics, radionuclide migration in the environment 121
Sivakumar R (2014) An assessment of natural radioactivity levels and radiation hazards in the soil of Coonoor, south India. J Environ Earth Sci 72:5063–5071
Smičiklas I, Šljivić-Ivanović M (2016) Radioactive contamination of the soil: assessments of pollutants mobility with implication to remediation strategies. Soil contamination–current consequences and further solutions. InTech, p 253-276
Sondi I, Juračić M, Pravdić V (1995) Sedimentation in a disequilibrium river-dominated estuary: the Raša River estuary (Adriatic Sea, Croatia). Sedimentology 42:769–782
Stein R, Ivanov G, Levitan M, Fahl K (1996) Surface sediment composition and sedimentary processes in the central Arctic Ocean and along the Eurasian Continental Margin. Berichtezur Polarforschung Series 212: pp 324
SureshGandhi M, Ravisankar R, Rajalakshmi A, Sivakumar S, Chandrasekaran A, Anand DP (2014) Measurements of natural gamma radiation in beach sediments of north east coast of Tamilnadu, India by gamma ray spectrometry with multivariate statistical approach. J Radiat Res Appl Sci 7(1):7–17
Szarlowicz K, Stobinski M, Hamerlik L, Bitusik P (2019) Origin and behavior of radionuclides in sediment core: a case study of the sediments collected from man-made reservoirs located in the past mining region in Central Slovakia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(7):7115–7122
Tam NFY, Wong YS (2000) Spatial variation of heavy metals in surface sediments of Hong Kong mangrove swamps. Environ Pollut 110(2):195–205
Tari M, Zarandi SAM, Mohammadi K, Zare MR (2013) The measurement of gamma-emitting radionuclides in beach sand cores of coastal regions of Ramsar, Iran using HPGe detectors. Mar Pollut Bull 74(1):425–434
Taskin H, Karavus M, Ay P, Topuzoglu A, Hindiroglum S, Karahan G (2009) Radionuclide concentrations in soil and lifetime cancer risk due to gamma radioactivity in Kirklareli, Turkey. J Environ Radioact 100:49–53
Tchokossa P, Olomo JB, Balogun FA, Adesanmi CA (2012) Radiological study of soils in oil and gas producing areas in Delta State, Nigeria. Radiat Prot Dosim 153(1):121–126
Todorović N, Bikit I, Vesković M, Mrdja D, Forkapić S, Hansman J, Nikolov J, Bikit K, Krmar M (2015) Radioactivity in fertilizers and radiological impact. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 303(3):2505–2509
Tsabaris C, Eleftheriou G, Kapsimalis V, Anagnostou C, Vlastou R, Durmishi C, Kedhi M, Kalfas CA (2007) Radioactivity levels of recent sediments in the Butrint Lagoon and the adjacent coast of Albania. Applied Radiation and Isotopes 65(4):445–453
Udoh BT, Esu IE, Ibia TO, Onweremadu EU, Unyienyin SE (2013) Agricultural potential of the beach ridge soils of the Niger Delta, Nigeria. Malay J Soil Sci 17:17–37
Ugolini R, Caldognetto E, Trotti F (2020) Use of fertilizers in agriculture: individual effective dose estimate. Environments 7(1):1–7
United Nations Environmental Programme, UNEP (2011) Environmental assessment of Ogoniland. UNEP Publication. Executive Summary, p 3
UNSCEAR (1982) Ionizing radiation sources and biological effects. United Nation Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. A/37/45. New York
UNSCEAR (1988) United Nations Scientific Committee on The effects of atomic radiation, sources and biological effects of ionizing radiation. United Nations, New York
UNSCEAR (2000) United Nations Scientific Committee on The effects of atomic radiation, sources and effects of ionizing radiation: sources (Vol. 1). United Nations Publications.
UNSCEAR (2010) Sources and effects of ionizing radiation: report to the General Assembly, with scientific annexes. United Nations, New York 1: 1-219
Wang A, He J, Du Y, He Y, Li Z, Chen Z, Yang C (2011) Natural and artificial radionuclide measurements and radioactivity assessment of soil samples in eastern Sichuan Province (China). Radiat Prot Dosim 150(3):391–397
Yu KN, Guan ZJ, Stoks MJ, Young EC (1992) The assessment of natural radiation doses committed to the Hong Kong People. J Environ Radioact 17:31–48
Zaidi JH, Arif M, Ahmad S, Fatima I, Qureshi IH (1999) Determination of natural radioactivity in building materials used in the Rawalpindi/Islamabad area by gamma-ray spectrometry and instrumental neutron activation analysis. Appl Radiat Isot 51:559–565
Zare MR, Mostajaboddavati M, Kamali M, Abdi MR, Mortazavi MS (2012) 235U, 238U, 232Th, 40K and 137Cs activity concentrations in marine sediments along the northern coast of Oman Sea using high-resolution gamma-ray spectrometry. Marine pollution bulletin 64(9):1956–1961
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the Management and Staff of National Institute of Radiation Protection and Research, University of Ibadan, Nigeria, for their assistance during the analyses of the samples. We also acknowlegde with thanks the valuable contributions and comments from the Reviewers and the Editor, that has helped in improving the quality of our manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Domenico M. Doronzo
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Akpan, A.E., Ebong, E.D., Ekwok, S.E. et al. Assessment of radionuclide distribution and associated radiological hazards for soils and beach sediments of Akwa Ibom Coastline, southern Nigeria. Arab J Geosci 13, 753 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-05727-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-05727-7