Abstract
Aeolian (wind) erosion is most common in arid regions. The resulted emission of PM10 (particulate matter that is smaller than 10 μm in diameter) from the soil has many environmental and socioeconomic consequences such as soil degradation and air pollution. Topsoil resistance to aeolian transport highly depends on the surface composition. The study aim was to examine variations in PM10 fluxes in a desert-dust source due to surface composition and topsoil disturbance. Aeolian field experiments using a boundary layer wind tunnel alongside soil composition analysis were integrated in this study. The results show variations in PM10 fluxes (ranging from 9.5 to 524.6 mg m−2 min−1) in the studied area. Higher wind velocity increased significantly the PM10 fluxes in all surface compositions. A short-term natural disturbance caused changes in the aggregate soil distribution (ASD) and increased significantly PM10 emissions. Considering that PM10 contains clays, organic matter, and absorbed elements, the recorded PM10 fluxes are indicative of the potential soil loss and degradation by wind erosion in such resource-limited ecosystems. The findings have implications in modeling dust emission from a source area with complex surfaces.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Aeolian (wind) soil erosion is a common process in arid regions that can lead to dust emission into the atmosphere. Dust emission has significant impacts on the Earth’s systems depending on the physical and chemical characteristics of the topsoil (Shao, 2008). The emission of dust from soils is a major concern due to soil degradation by loss of clays (< 2 μm) and fine silt (< 10 μm), and absorbed nutrients. In addition, emission of PM10 and PM2.5 (particulate matter that is smaller than 10 and 2.5 μm in diameter, respectively) to the atmosphere increases air pollution and health risks particularly in arid environments (Ganor et al., 2009; Krasnov et al., 2014; Vodonos et al., 2014; Yitshak-Sade et al., 2015).
The surface characteristics determine the critical value (threshold) of wind (friction) velocity at which the aerodynamic drag is enough to dislodge particles from the surface and initiate their transport (Bagnold, 1941; Kok et al., 2012). Direct aerodynamic lifting is a dominant mechanism for loose fine-particle emission such as PM10. However, emission of cohesive fine particles (e.g., clays) is enabled only under higher wind velocities and/or under saltation flow (Bagnold, 1941; Kok et al., 2012). The presence of sand particles in the soil enables the entrainment of fine particles (clay and silt) by ballistic impact (saltation bombardment) (Shao et al., 1993). Surface cover such as vegetation and rock fragments increases surface roughness and thus reduces near-surface wind velocities and erosion (Wolfe and Nickling, 1993; Gillies et al., 2006; Li et al., 2005). Crusted surface layer significantly reduces soil erodibility, where the strength of crusts varies with the composition and distribution of the binding media (Belnap and Gillette, 1998; Langston and McKenna Neuman 2005; Zaady et al., 2014). Among the soil properties, the dry aggregate size distribution of the topsoil is a major factor influencing the resistance to wind erosion. High proportion of erodible fraction (EF) (aggregates >840 μm) in the upper layer of the soil surface increase its erodibility (Hevia et al., 2007; Van Pelt et al., 2013; Li et al., 2015; Swet and Katra, 2016).
Desert environments are associated with a diverse range of geomorphological landforms such as desert pavements, playas, and alluvial fans that constitute source areas of dust emission (Bacon et al., 2011; Sweeney et al., 2011; Al-Dousari and Al-Awadhi 2012). The specific surface properties and the presence of different features on the surface (e.g., vegetation, crusts or rock fragments) control the magnitude of dust-related PM10 emission from a specific soil (King and Nickling, 2005; Bacon et al., 2011; Hoffmann and Funk, 2015). It has been shown that topsoil disturbance can significantly accelerate aeolian erosion and PM10 flux compared with natural (non-disturbed) crusted topsoil’s (Sharratt et al., 2010; Baddock et al., 2011; Singh et al., 2012).
Soils in many deserts throughout the world are subjected to strain of increased human pressure and thus changes in their physico-chemical properties and potential of dust emission. The underlying assumptions about the surface complexity in a dust source incorporated into the dust emission models limit their accuracy. Knowledge about the variability of actual dust emission at various scales is still lacking. Katra and Lancaster (2008) demonstrated spatio-temporal variability in the surface sediments of identified source area to reveal the potential changes for dust emissions over time. The study aim was to examine variations in PM10 fluxes due to surface composition and topsoil disturbance. Aeolian field experiments by a boundary layer wind tunnel were applied to quantify the PM10 fluxes from a study area with typical soil characteristics of arid dust sources.
Material and methods
Experimental plots
The study was conducted on desert soils of the Negev (Yamin Plain), Israel. The tested soils in Yamin Plain have not been exposed to anthropogenic activities as it is a part of natural reserves. The annual average rainfall is ~75 mm. The silt-loam soils are characterized by low content of organic matter (< 1 %) and a wide range of sand/clay percentage depending on the specific site location. During the majority of the year, the topsoil is dry and is subjected to intensive aeolian erosion. The dominant wind direction is northwest during the day and alternates to southwestern along the night. The wind velocities can exceed up to 13 m s−1 (measured 6 m above the soil surface).
Experimental plots were designed within a closed area without human interference during the last six decades. The experimental plots for the soil sampling and the aeolian experiments (see below) were representative of the surface cover in the area (Fig. 1): an extensive coverage of mechanical crust (MC), sparse vegetation-shrubs cover (SV) with a typical distance of about 2 m between adjunct shrubs, and soil mechanical crust covered with different sizes (up to 15 cm in diameter) of rock fragments (RF).
Soil analysis
In each experimental plot (SV, RF, MC), dry soil samples were taken from the topsoil (0–2 cm), which is the exposed layer to wind erosion processes. A total of 48 samples (n = 16; for each SV, RF, and MC soil type) were analyzed in the lab for soil properties using soil science methods (Klute, 1986; Rowell, 1994; Pansu and Gautheyrou, 2006) as follows.
Aggregate size distribution (ASD) was conducted by using the dry sieving method. The samples were placed on a set of six sieves in the diameters of 63–4000 μm and were shaken in moderate amplitude for 8 min by an electronic sieving apparatus (RETSCH AS 300 Control). After sifting, every size fraction was weighted separately. In the fraction of >2000 μm, rock fragments were extracted from the rest of the soil particles. The results have been used to calculate the mean weight diameter (MWD) of the soil aggregates.
Particle size distribution (PSD) was performed by ANALYSETTE 22 MicroTec Plus laser diffractometer (www.fritsch.com), which measures particles in the size range of 0.08–2000 μm. The preparation of each sample includes splitting for replicate samples by a micro-splitter device and the removal of distinct organic matter. For the analysis, the replicates (100 mg) of each sample were dispersed in a Na-hexametaphosphate solution (0.5 %) and by sonication (38 kHz). PSD data was calculated using the Fraunhofer diffraction model. By using MasControl software, relevant parameters were determined statistically: mean size, median, and modes in multiple modal distributions, sorting values, size fraction weights. The size resolution for analyses was 1 μm. The results allow the determination of the soil texture of sand (50–2000 μm), silt (2–50 μm), and clay (< 2 μm) according to the USDA classification.
Aeolian experiments
Aeolian experiments in the field were conducted in dry soils (Fig. 1) with a boundary-layer wind tunnel. Boundary-layer wind tunnels enable aeolian simulations under standardized quasi-natural wind conditions (Shao, 2008) and provide quantitative information on aeolian particle transport, including sand fluxes (Katra et al., 2014) and dust emission rates from soils (Tanner et al., 2016). The wind tunnel used in this study has a cross sectional area in the order of 0.5 × 0.5 m with open-floored working sections of up to 10 m length (see more details in Swet and Katra, 2016). The airflow in the tunnel is generated by an axial fan up to a maximum velocity of 18 m s−1. Instruments installed in the test section of the tunnel enable quantification of wind characteristics and sediment transport.
The aeolian experiments in each plot were performed under two topsoil conditions: (1) natural surfaces (a non-disturbed topsoil) and (2) disturbed surface in which the topsoil was artificially disturbed at the upper 2 cm layer by the same mechanical operation in all plots to simulate disaggregation of the topsoil. In each experimental plot, 12 sub-plots (replicas) were defined in size area of 0.5 m × 10 m in accordance with the dimensions of the experimental system. A total of 72 experiments were conducted in the field (3 plots, 2 soil treatments, 2 wind speeds, and 6 replicas).
The tunnel fan was set in two frequencies; the first of 32 Hz represents medium wind speed in the study area and above the threshold of particle transport (~5 m s−1), and the second of 44 Hz represents higher wind speed of typical aeolian erosion conditions in the studied area (~ 9 m s−1). In each experimental plot, the mean wind velocity profile was measured under both fan frequencies (32 and 44 Hz). The shear velocities (u *) calculated by the semi-empirical logarithmic law of Karman (Bagnold, 1941) were at the range of 0.31–0.69 m s−1, depending on the fan frequency and the surface composition (plot). During each test, the PM10 concentrations in the wind tunnel were measured by a particulate monitor (HAZ-DUST EPAM-5000, www.skcinc.com). The EPAM-5000 uses light scattering technique to measure particle concentration and provide real-time data recordings at the range of 0.01 to 200 mg m−3 (accuracy ±10 % to filter gravimetric test dust). The recorded PM10 data over time were converted into fluxes from the soil surface based on the wind tunnel dimensions and area of the experimental plot (3.75 m2). The sand transport during the experiment was measured by a cylindrical piezo-electric sensor (www.sensit.com) that converts the impact energy of the saltating particles into electrical impulses. The Sensit data were logged as number of impact-particles (NP) on a Campbell Scientific Inc. CR-1000X data logger at 1 s intervals. The NP values were converted into horizontal saltator flux (mg m−2 s−1) considering the sensor impact area and the weight of the sand particles in the studied area at the size of 100–200 μm (the mean weight of 1 particle =57 μg). Each experiment lasted 400 s, representing a typical trend of soil erosion under limited sediment supply (Tanner et al., 2016).
Results and discussion
Topsoil characteristics
The PSD results show a tri-modal distribution in all the experimental plots (Fig. 2). The results represent both conditions of natural surface and disturbed surfaces – the samples were extracted prior to aeolian experiments in each condition, considering that no changes in PSD are expected in response to a short-term disturbance of the topsoil. SV soil was coarser, with significantly higher sand content than RF and MC soils. RF soil showed higher amount of clay compared to SV and MC soils. Differences in PM10 content in the soil were noted between the plots, in which the highest content was in MC plot while the lowest content in SV.
Aggregate size distribution was measured for each plot and soil conditions (natural and disturbed) (Fig. 3). In both soil conditions, the amount of aggregate at the size fraction of 250–500 μm was higher compared with the other size fractions. The disturbance of the topsoil led to elimination of aggregates >2000 μm and to a reduction in the content of aggregates in the size fraction of 1000–2000 μm. Accordingly, the amounts of the smaller size fractions 500–1000, 250–500, 125–250, 63–125, and <63 μm were increased following disturbance by 18, 26, 34, 34, and 63 %, respectively. The most significant change occurred in MC plot with increased amount of the erodible fraction (< 500 μm) following disturbance.
MWD driven from ASD was calculated for both conditions of natural and disturbed surfaces. The relatively low MWD values in natural condition in all plots (362.5, 512.5, and 433 μm in SV, RF, and MC, respectively) indicate a potential of high susceptibility to wind erosion due to high proportion of erodible aggregate size fractions. The MWD values were lower at all experimental plots following disturbance of the natural surfaces (314.1, 283.2, and 253.3 μm in SV, RF, and MC, respectively).
Variations in PM10 flux
The in situ aeolian experiments enabled the measurement of PM10 emission from the topsoil following wind erosion. A similar trend in PM10 emission was observed for natural and disturbed surfaces in both lower (32 Hz) and higher (44 Hz) wind velocities at all experimental plots (Fig. 4). The dust emission is characterized by increased PM10 concentrations in the first few seconds of the run up to a peak value, a relatively moderate decline followed by a steady-state phase which consist low PM10 concentrations. In all cases, increased wind velocity resulted in higher PM10 concentration over time (Fig. 3). At lower velocity (32 Hz frequency), the disturbance of the topsoil did not lead to a significant increase in PM10 concentrations at all plots. At high wind velocity (44 Hz frequency), significantly higher PM10 concentrations were recorded in all experiments. These changes particularly in the natural topsoil are indicative of the importance of wind velocity.
In order to estimate PM10 losses from the topsoils, the PM10 concentrations measured during the aeolian experiments were converted into PM10 fluxes from the soil (mg m−2 min−1) (Table 1). In all topsoil conditions and wind velocities, MC plot showed the highest PM10 flux (except for the disturbed topsoil in frequency of 44 Hz) although with no statistical significance (p ≤ 0.05). Significant differences between the plots were noted only at disturbed topsoil in a 44 Hz frequency, were PM10 flux from SV plot was significantly higher than RF plot. In both SV and MC plots, significantly higher PM10 flux was obtained under 44 Hz in disturbed soil condition. RF plot showed no significant differences between the different topsoil conditions and wind velocities.
The PM10 fluxes at the lower velocity (32 Hz frequency) were increased by 144.2 % in SV plot due to topsoil disturbance (Table 1). At the higher wind velocity (44 Hz frequency), the PM10 fluxes were increased by 98.5–336.8 % in all plots. The results indicate that the effect of topsoil disturbance on PM10 fluxes is stronger under higher wind velocities as demonstrated also by Li et al. (2015). However, the increase in wind velocity from 32 to 44 Hz in the natural topsoils led to increase in PM10 fluxes of 261.6 % (MC), 316.6 %, and 1164.2 % (SV). These changes are indicative of the importance of wind velocity in dust emission rates in the studied area. A positive linear correlation (R 2 = 0.73) was found in the current study between the wind shear velocities (u*) and the PM10 fluxes in the natural topsoils of all the plots. The correlation supports the findings of previous work (e.g., Sweeney and Mason, 2013).
Impact of saltators
Dust particle is emitted from soils through physical mechanisms, including direct aerodynamic lifting, saltation bombardment and disaggregation/self-breakdown of saltating (sand-size) aggregates (Shao, 2008; Kok et al., 2012; Swet and Katra, 2016). The relationships between the soil saltators (i.e., sand particles and/or sand-sized aggregates) and PM10 fluxes from the topsoil were examined. The results indicate an exponential correlation between the saltators and PM10 emission in all soil compositions (Fig. 5). The strongest correlation was obtained in RF (R 2 = 0.84) followed by SV (R 2 = 0.78) and MC (R 2 = 0.52). The higher content of soil PM10 in MC plot compare to the other plots (Fig. 2) may contributed more to the total PM10 fluxes via direct aerodynamic lifting mechanism rather than saltation bombardment and disaggregation, which can explain the weaker correlation to saltator flux obtained in this plot. In contrast, the significantly higher amount of sand particles in SV plot (Fig. 2) can be associated with the highest PM10 fluxes measured at the disturbed topsoil at 44 Hz (Table 1) through the saltation bombardment mechanism.
The saltation during the aeolian experiment was measured by the number of impact-particles (saltators) in the size range of ~80–500 μm (in accordance with the wind threshold velocity used in this study). The impact-particles include not only loose sand particles but also sand-sized aggregates that participate in saltation. For a better understanding of PM10 emission under soil aggregation, Pearson correlation coefficient between the amount of different aggregate sizes in the topsoil (based on ASD, Fig. 3) and PM10 flux (Table 1) was examined. At the lower wind velocity (32 Hz), none of the aggregate size fractions were correlated with PM10 fluxes. In order to transport aggregates, the wind needs to exceed a certain threshold velocity that depends on the size of the aggregate. The lack of correlation indicates that the wind at 32 Hz was below the threshold velocity even for the smallest aggregates (> 63 μm). Therefore, it is assumed that the PM10 flux in this case is contributed mainly by the direct aerodynamic lifting mechanism. At higher wind velocity (44 Hz), relatively strong correlations were found between PM10 fluxes and the amounts of aggregate at the sizes of <63 μm (R p = 0.89, p < 0.05) and 250–500 μm (R p = 0.87, p < 0.05). The correlation between PM10 flux and the size fraction of <63 μm can be explained by the fact that the particles smaller than 10 μm are a part of the fraction of <63 μm. The amplification of wind velocity (from 32 to 44 Hz) enabled the saltation of aggregates up to the size range of 500 μm (Kok et al., 2012; Katra et al., 2014). Aggregates at this size range can enter saltation and release more PM10 particles. Tisdall and Oades (1982) suggested that micro-aggregates (< 250 μm) can be easily eroded as a result of their small size, but on the other hand have higher internal strength than macro-aggregates (>250 μm) as a result of stronger bonds between the particles. The results of the correlation obtained for 250–500 μm aggregate size support this concept, enabling dust emission from aggregates by saltation bombardment and/or self-breakdown and disaggregation.
Conclusions
Dust emission was examined in a study area with typical soil characteristics of arid dust sources. The results highlight variations in PM10 emission due to surface compositions and topsoil disturbance. Surfaces with cover of sparse vegetation (SV) were found to be less resistant to aeolian wind erosion with the highest PM10 fluxes compared to surfaces with cover of rock fragments (RF) cover and mechanical crust (MC). In all surfaces, the disturbance of the natural topsoil caused to decrease in the topsoil aggregation and increased PM10 emission. The amount of loose PM10 particles available at the surface for direct aerodynamic lifting and the amount of the less-stable aggregate size fractions (250–500 μm) are important factors for dust emission rates from these soils. The findings suggest that the specific aggregate size distribution of the soil is necessary for better estimation of PM10 fluxes at the fine scale in arid soils. Calculations of the potential soil loess in this study highlight a direct impact of a short-term topsoil disaggregation on wind erosion. Dust deposition in the Negev, originates from different sources (such as Saharan dust storms) is about 150 g m−2 per year, in which the PM10 fraction is ~25 %. The high dust emission rates from disturbed soils in the Negev suggest a negative balance per year with significant reduction in topsoil PM10 contents (Katra et al., 2016). A major consequence is related to reduction of clays and nutrients that play a key role in the soil stability and fertility in resource-limited ecosystems. The study findings have implications for modeling dust emission from source areas with complex surfaces, which are typical to many dust sources in deserts thorough the world.
References
Al-Dousari AM, Al-Awadhi J (2012) Dust fallout in northern Kuwait, major sources and characteristics. Kuwait Journal of Science and Engineering 39(2 A):171–187
Bacon SN, McDonald EV, Amit R, Enzel Y, Crouvi O, 2011. Total suspended particulate matter emissions at high friction velocities from desert landforms. Journal of Geophysics Research, 116, doi:10.1029/2011JF001965
Baddock MC, Zobeck TM, Van Pelt RS, Fredrickson EL (2011) Dust emissions from undisturbed and disturbed, crusted playa surfaces: cattle trampling effects. Aeolian Res 3(1):31–41
Bagnold RA (1941) The physics of wind blown sand and desert dunes. Methuen, London, 265
Belnap J, Gillette D (1998) Vulnerability of desert biological soil crusts to wind erosion: the influences of crust development, soil texture, and disturbance. J Arid Environ 39:133–142
Ganor E, Kronfeld J, Feldman HR, Rosenfeld A, Ilani S (2009) Environmental dust: a tool to study the patina of ancient artifacts. J Arid Environ 73(12):1170–1176
Gillies JA, Nickling WG, King J (2006) Aeolian sediment transport through large patches of roughness in the atmospheric inertial sublayer. J Geophys Res 111:F02006. doi:10.1029/2005JF000434
Hevia GG, Mendez M, Buschiazzo DE (2007) Tillage affects soil aggregation parameters linked with wind erosion. Geoderma 140(1):90–96
Hoffmann C, Funk R (2015) Diurnal changes of PM10-emission from arable soils in NE-Germany. Aeolian Res 17:117–127
Katra I, Lancaster N (2008) Surface-sediment dynamics in a dust source from spaceborne multispectral thermal infrared data. Remote Sens Environ. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2008.03.016
Katra I, Yizhaq H, Kok JF (2014) Mechanisms limiting the growth of aeolian megaripples. Geophys Res Lett. doi:10.1002/2013GL058665
Katra I, Gross A, Swet N, Tanner S, Krasnov H, Angert A (2016) Substantial dust loss of bioavailable phosphorus from agricultural soils. Scientific Reports 6:24736
King J, Nickling GW (2005) Representation of vegetation and other nonerodible elements in aeolian shear stress partitioning models for predicting transport threshold. Journal of Geophysics Research 110:F04015. doi:10.1029/2004JF000281
Klute A (1986) Methods of soil analysis. part 1. physical and mineralogical methods. American Society of Agronomy, Inc
Kok JF, Parteli EJ, Michaels TI, Karam DB (2012) The physics of wind-blown sand and dust. Rep Prog Phys 75(10):106901
Krasnov H, Katra I, Koutrakis P, Friger M (2014) Contribution of dust storms to PM10 levels in an urban arid environment. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 64:89–94
Langston G, McKenna Neuman C (2005) An experimental study on the susceptibility of crusted surfaces to wind erosion: a comparison of the strength properties of biotic and salt crusts. Geomorphology 72:40–53
Li F, Kang L, Zhang H, Zhao L, Shirato Y, Taniyama I (2005) Changes in intensity of wind erosion at different stages of degradation development in grasslands of Inner Mongolia, China. J Arid Environ 62(4):567–585
Li H, Tatarko J, Kucharski M, Dong Z (2015) PM2. 5 and PM10 emissions from agricultural soils by wind erosion. Aeolian Research
Pansu M, Gautheyrou J (2006) Handbook of soil analysis: mineralogical, organic and inorganic methods Springer
Rowell DL (1994) Soil science: methods and applications. Longman Group Limited, Longman Scientific & Technical
Shao Y (2008) Physics and modelling of wind erosion (Vol. 37). Springer Science & Business Media
Shao Y, Raupach MR, Findlater PA (1993) Effect of saltation bombardment on the entrainment of dust by wind. J Geophys Res 98:12719–12726
Sharratt B, Wendling L, Feng G (2010) Windblown dust affected by tillage intensity during summer fallow. Aeolian Res 2:129–134
Singh P, Sharratt B, Schillinger WF (2012) Wind erosion PM10 emission affected by tillage system in the world’s driest rainfed wheat region. Soil Tillage Res 124:219–225
Sweeney MR, Mason JA (2013) Mechanism of dust emission from Pleistocene loess deposits, Nebraska, USA. J Geophys Res 118:1460–1471
Sweeney MR, McDonald EV, Etyemezian V (2011) Quantifying dust emissions from desert landforms, eastern Mojave Desert, USA. Geomorphology 135:21–34
Swet N, Katra I (2016) Reduction in soil aggregation in response to dust emission processes. Geomorphology 268:177–183
Tanner S, Katra I, Haim A, Zaady E (2016) Short-term soil loss by aeolian erosion in response to conventional and organic agricultural practices. Soil Tillage Res 155:146–156
Tisdall J, Oades J (1982) Organic matter and water-stable aggregates in soils. J Soil Sci 33(2):141–163
Van Pelt RS, Baddock MC, Zobeck TM, Schlegel AJ, Vigil MF, Acosta Martinez V (2013) Field wind tunnel testing of two silt loam soils on the North America central high plains. Aeolian Res 10:53–59
Vodonos A, Friger M, Katra I, Avnon L, Krasnov H, Koutrakis P, Schwatz J, Lior O, Novack V (2014) The impact of desert dust exposures on hospitalizations due to exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health 7(4):433–439
Wolfe SA, Nickling WG (1993) The protective role of sparse vegetation in wind erosion. Prog Phys Geogr 17:50–68
Yitshak-Sade M, Novack V, Katra I, Gorodischer R, Tal A, Novack L (2015) Non-anthropogenic dust exposure and asthma medication purchase in children. Eur Respir J 45(3):652–660
Zaady E, Katra I, Yizhaq H, Kinast S, Ashkenazy Y (2014) Inferring the impact of rainfall gradient on biocrusts’ developmental stage and thus on soil physical structures in sand dunes. Aeolian Res 13:81–89
Acknowledgments
The study was supported by grants from the Israel Science Foundation (1100/11) and the Nuclear Research Center-Negev Israel.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Edri, A., Dody, A., Tanner, S. et al. Variations in dust-related PM10 emission from an arid land due to surface composition and topsoil disturbance. Arab J Geosci 9, 607 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-016-2651-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-016-2651-z