Abstract
This paper presents findings from detailed geologic mapping of the Cenomanian–Campanian sediment package of southern Benue Trough, outcropping in Afikpo area of Southeastern Nigeria. The aim was to integrate outcrop and sedimentological log data with lithofacies analyses to better understand prevalent depositional processes and environments of deposition, across the Amaseri–Ngodo outcrop sections. Ten lithofacies with their associated subordinate lithofacies were identified and grouped into five facies associations (FA 1–5) to aid depositional environment interpretation. FA 1 consists of silty-shale and shales of the mudstone (MS) lithofacies deposited within an oxygenated offshore/open shelf setting, probably below fair-weather and storm wave base. FA 2 comprises medium–coarse-grained sandstone (MCS), hummocky cross-bedded sandstone (sub-lithofacies 4 of CBS), bioturbated sandstone (BSs) facies, bioturbated siltstone (BSt) and planar parallel-laminated sandstone (PPLS) lithofacies, interpreted to be storm wave-dominated shelf deposits. FA 3 consists of tabular/planar and trough cross-bedded sandstones (sub-lithofacies 1 and 2 of CBS) and wave ripple-laminated sandstones (RLS) lithofacies interpreted as shorefaces deposits above fair-weather wave base. Herringbone cross-bedded sandstones (sub-lithofacies 3 of CBS) and bioclastic limestone (BcL) lithofacies constitute FA 4, interpreted as tidal inlet/lagoonal deposits. FA 5 is characterized by conglomeritic sandstone (CS) lithofacies, as well as CBS, PPLS, RLS lithofacies, deposited within fluvial channels. Furthermore, vertical stacking patterns reveal the occurrence of two facies successions: the fining-upwards/thinning-upwards (FU/TnU) succession (typical of deepening or shallow to proximal offshore marine environments), dominating the northern and central part of the study area; and coarsening-upwards/thickening-upwards (CU/TkU) succession (typical of shoaling or proximal offshore to shallow marine environment), dominating the southern part of the study area. Overall, these lithofacies represents deposits within the littoral (marginal marine) and sub-littoral (shallow marine) environments.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Detailed geologic mapping and sedimentological logging have been carried out around Afikpo town and environs, which cover an area of approximately 574 km2 (Fig. 1a). Outcrop data integrated with lithofacies and petrographic analyses have been used to improve the understanding of lithofacies, facies association and of environments of deposition across the Middle–Upper Cretaceous (Cenomanian–Campanian) successions in the southern Benue Trough. Studies have shown that distinctive sets of characteristics from rock units such as grain size and primary sedimentary structures are needed to delineate a lithofacies and understand the processes that were operational during sediment deposition in various environments (Miall 2000; Kendall 2005). The Cretaceous stratigraphic successions of the southern Benue Trough are characterized by a series of structurally deformed sediments that gave rise to a number of rapidly alternating parallel to sub-parallel sandstone ridges and shale lowlands outcropping in Afikpo and Ugep areas in Southeastern Nigeria. Associated with this sediment deformation are igneous intrusions. These are evident in the geologic features such as anticlines, fold limbs, deformational bands, faults, joints and igneous intrusives encountered in the across the study area. Benkhelil (1989) noted that these features were as a result of compressional folding, faulting and magmatism during the mid-Santonian tectonic episode that affected the southern Benue Trough. The Afikpo area and its environs are underlain by lithofacies belonging to three lithostratigraphic units namely; the Eze-Aku Shale and Amaseri Sandstone (Eze-Aku Group) and the Afikpo Formation (Nkporo Group). The Eze-Aku Group is made up of gray and dark calcareous shale, limestone, siltstone and sandstone whereas the Nkporo Group comprises of medium to coarse-grained sandstone, pebbly/conglomeritic sandstone and dark shales (Murat 1972 and Nwajide 2013).
Over the years, efforts at carrying out detailed outcrop studies across these areas have been limited due to the lack of good exposures. Attempts have been made to group the sandstone and shale units of the Eze-Aku Formation into several members (Ukaegbu and Akpabio 2009) and classify them into several lithofacies and depositional environments (Okoro and Igwe 2014). These have been done using information from a few exposed sections. Although sedimentological studies have been carried out (Simpsons 1954) and depositional models developed (Banerjee 1980; Amajor 1980, 1987) for the Middle–Upper Cretaceous units of the southern Benue Trough, these have generally been on a regional scale. Recently, quarrying has exposed some good sections of the ridges, prompting a renewed interest in the area (Fig. 2). The present study is aimed at carrying out a detailed outcrop mapping and integrating the data obtained from lithofacies analyses to better delineate lithofacies and understand the distribution of lithofacies successions, facies association and their environments of deposition.
Geologic setting
The Benue Trough is a NE–SW trending sedimentary complex of sub-basins of about 1000 km long and 50–100 km wide and contains up to 6000 m thick of Cretaceous sediments of which those predating the mid-Santonian have been folded, faulted and uplifted in several places (Whiteman 1982; Wright et al. 1985). Benkhelil (1989) observed that the compressional folding during the mid-Santonian tectonic episode affected the whole of the southern Benue Trough and was quite intense, producing many anticlinal and synclinal structures. Major deformational structures include the Abakaliki Anticlinorium and the Afikpo Syncline that are evident in the southern Benue Trough, which forms the focus of the present study (Fig. 3). Closely associated with the Santonian deformation was also the emplacement of numerous mafic intrusives and alkaline/calc–alkaline lavas and tuffs (Wright 1968). The sequence of events—rifting stage, the trough stage, the deformation stage with magmatism and the platform stage leading to the formation of the Trough—has been recorded by Burke et al. (1971); Grant (1971); Nwachukwu (1972); Olade (1975); Offodile (1976); Benkhelil (1982); Hoque and Nwajide (1985) and Ofoegbu (1985). The stratigraphic successions and sedimentologic history of the southern Benue Trough is well documented in Petters (1978); Hoque (1976) and Ojoh (1992). Although much work has been done with reference to stratigraphy of the southern Nigeria sedimentary basins, there still exist contrary views from the generally accepted thought that the Afikpo Basin and Anambra Basin are separate entities. Nwajide (2013) has opined that since both resulted from the same Santonian thermotectonic event in the southern Benue Trough with no physical separation or barrier between the two areas, therefore, there should be no justification for according the Afikpo area the status of a basin distinct from the Anambra Basin. The stratigraphic succession of the study area lies within the Middle–Upper Cretaceous sequence (Cenomanian to Campanian), spanning through southern Benue Trough (Abakaliki) and Anambra basins in the Southeastern (Fig. 4).
Method of investigation
Newly and previously exposed outcrop sections, specifically quarries and road cuts, were mapped, logged and sampled. The outcrop sections were assigned numbers ranging from 1 to 10 (Fig. 1a). Selected rock samples were subjected to petrographic analysis through megascopic (handheld specimen) and microscopic (thin section) studies, to provide data for interpretation of the textural and mineralogical characteristics of lithofacies. Lithofacies delineation was based on attributes of lithology/rock-type structural and textural features (bedding type, texture, grain size and shape, fossils, primary sedimentary and syn-depositional structures). Primary sedimentary structures were also studied and used in determining the hydrodynamic processes that were prevalent during sediment deposition and also infer possible depositional environment. Sandstones and carbonates were classified using the Folk (1959, 1974) and Dunham (1962) systems. Vertical log profile and sediment stacking patterns also gave insight on facies succession observed in this study. Delineated lithofacies were further group into various facies associations, which aided in the recognition of environments of deposition. Depositional and lithofacies models were also integrated to better interpret the delineated lithofacies and their corresponding environments of deposition. Sedimentologic logs (that were generated using data obtained from outcrop sections) were built using modified SedLog 2.1.4™ (Fig. 9).
Results and interpretation
Outcrop description
Outcrop sections logged across the northern through central part of the area are as follows: (i) Amaseri section—outcrop 1 (66.5 m thick of sediment), which lies on the Amaseri ridge along Amaseri–Okposi road is well exposed at the Crush Stone quarry site (Fig. 5a–f); (ii) Akpoha section—outcrop 2 (70.3 m thick of sediment) is well exposed on the Akpoha ridges along Okigwe–Abba Omega road and stretches from an artisan local quarry through the Julius Berger quarry site in Akpoha (Fig. 6a–g); (iii) Ibii section—outcrop 4 and 5 (about 180.5 m thick of sediment) conformably overlies the shale units of Akpoha–Ibii section (Fig. 7a–i); (iv) Ozara-Ukwu sections—outcrop 6, 7 and 8 (three sub-section of about 221 m thick of sediment (Fig. 8a–e); (v) Ozara–Ukwu/Afikpo section—outcrop 8 (37 m thick of sediment (Fig. 8f–h); (vi) “Why Worry Spring”–Afikpo section—outcrop 9 (40 m thick of sediment) is exposed around Mcgregor College–Afikpo Junction (Fig. 8i); (vii) Ngodo Hill section—outcrop 10 (53 m thick of sediment) is exposed at Ngodo town, few kilometers from Mcgregor College–Afikpo Junction (Fig. 8j–m). Outcrop 1–5 are exposed at the northern and the central part and Outcrop 6–7 at the southern part within the sandstone ridges and shale lowlands of the area. The prominent sandstone ridges include those of Amaseri, Akpoha, Ibii, Ozara–Ukwu and Ngodo ridges (Fig. 1b, c). On the basis of orientation, the ridge belts have been sub-divided into two, namely the NE–SW trending ridges paralleling the axis of the Benue Trough and the E–W ridges. Sand bodies occurring within the area are discontinuous (less than 1 km to few kilometers in length) and trend in E–W and ENE–WSW directions.
Structural influences are seen on stratigraphy as sediment packages are highly tilted, with each succeeding logged outcrop section overlying the preceding outcrop section across the area (Fig. 9). The attitude of beds is such that they strike 54° ENE–234° WSW and dip in a direction 144° SSE, with high angles of dip (25°–40°) in the northern through central part and relatively low angle of dip (9°–7°) in the southern part, which dip mostly southerly. A prominent feature of an anticlinal plunge fold is well exposed in the Amaseri section (Fig. 5a–e). Bed thicknesses range from 0.25 to 2.5 m. Lithologies include fine, medium and coarse-grained calcareous sandstone, pebbly to cobbly conglomeritic sandstone, siltstone, shale, silty-shale and limestone units. The area is characterized by series of shale and sandstone interstratification. Soft-sediment deformational features such as convolute laminated and load cast structure are seen on the fine-grained sandstone units (Figs. 5f and 6f). Some of the sandstone units show rip-out and intact boulders/rock clast and occassional near oval to oval vugs/clast aligned along bedding planes (Fig. 7a, f). Primary sedimentary structures such as laminations (parallel and wave-ripple) and cross-beddings (tabular, trough, herringbone and hummocky), also characterize some of the sandstone units (Fig. 8a, b, c, f). Visible on the lithologic units are also joint structures and deformational bands, which are evidence of sediment deformation (Figs. 6g and 8h, 8j). Evidence of bioturbation and burrowing are present as complex network of horizontal burrows (Planolites and Thallassinoides), and vertical burrows (Ophiomorpha) are observed in the siltstone and sandstone units (Figs. 7b, c, h and 8l, m). Outcrop mapping in the area also reveals the occurrence of a basal doleritic intrusion, which has the same angle of dip with the overlying shale unit (Fig. 8g). This intrusive body has been classified as a sill, because it is conformable with the local stratigraphic package in the area.
Lithofacies and facies succession
Ten (10) lithofacies were identified across the Amaseri, Akpoha, Ibii, Ozara-Ukwu, Afikpo and Ngodo stratigraphic successions, and include the following: (i) medium–coarse sandstone (MCS) facies; (ii) fine sandstone (FS) facies; (iii) bioclastic limestone (BcL) facies; (iv) mudstone (MS) facies; (v) bioturbated siltstone (BSt) facies; (vi) bioturbated sandstone (BSs) facies; (vii) planer-parallel-laminated sandstone (PPLS) facies; (viii) ripple-laminated sandstone (RLS) facies; (ix) cross-bedded sandstone (CBS) facies; and (x) conglomeritic sandstone (CS) facies. Vertical log section at the various outcrop indicates the occurrence of two (2) stratigraphic/facies successions. These include the following: (i) fining-upwards/thinning-upwards (FU/TnU) succession that contains coarser grained facies near the base and progressively becomes finer upwards; and (ii) coarsening-upwards/thickening-upwards (CU/TkU) stratigraphic/facies successions that show overall finer grained facies near the base, which progressively becomes coarser grained (overall) towards the top with variable thickness of sediment package from few centimeters to meters. The northern through the central parts of study area shows a dominance of FU/TnU facies successions. This is contrary to the stratigraphic successions of outcrop sections in the northern part, which shows a predominance of CU/TkU facies succession (Fig. 9). These successions are made up of sediment packages that belong to various lithofacies. Detailed interpretation on these lithofacies is given below (Table. 1).
The medium–coarse sandstone (MCS) facies consists of basically horizontal bedded sandstone units. This facies outcrops at the basal part of Amaseri and upper part of Akpoha and Ibii sections (Figs. 5a, b, c and 11). They are grayish brown, highly consolidated fine, medium and coarse-grained sandstone units with moderately to poorly sorted sediment particles. They are devoid of internal sedimentary structures. MCS facies are found within a FU/TnU facies succession and litthofacies thickness varies from 0.1 to 0.5 m. Hand specimen of the MCS facies show sub-rounded mineral grains (Figs. 10a–e). In thin section, the facies consists of quartz (about 60–70 %), feldspars (10 %), mica (2 %) and rock matrix (of about 20 %, mainly clay and silt-sized quartz, mica, feldspar and heavy minerals). The fine-grained units associated with this facies show a convolute laminated structure (a soft-sediment folding), which is the characteristic of beds of fine sand deposited rapidly by events such as turbidity currents or storms (Fig. 5f).
The fine sandstone (FS) facies is composed of well-sorted fine-grained sandstone with siltstone and shale units (Fig. 10g). This lithofacies outcrops mainly at the middle and upper parts of Ibii section (Fig. 11). The lithologic units of the FS facies are calcareous and the sandstone units exhibit concentric marks on the surface of large boulders (Fig. 7f). The sandstone units also show parallel lamination which suggests a rapid deposition from sediment laden flow (Nichols 2009). The FS facies is associated with interstratified sandstone and shale unit. The shale units of this facies are highly fissile, and the sections are dark gray to bluish gray but tends to be yellowish-reddish brown when weathered. MCS facies and FS facies, which comprise of fine, medium and coarse-grained sandstone, make up the bulk percentage of lithofacies occurring in the southern part of the study area (Table 1).
Bioclastic limestone (BcL) facies consists of gray colored, highly fossilferous lime-mud bed. They are exposed partly at the upper parts of Akpoha and Ibii outcrop sections (Figs. 6d, e and 11). The BcL facies were found occurring within silty-sandstone units. Hand specimen shows molds and calcite-mineralized shells of bivalves and brachiopods are present in the limestone units (Fig. 10h, i). BcL facies are characterized by the occurrence of grain-supported (sandy skeletal grain-rich packstone) allochems with sub-equal spar and micrite content. Lithofacies thickness ranges from 0.1 to 1 m. BcL facies are characterized by rock units that are typical of poorly washed bioclastic limestone as classified by Dunham (1962) and are attributed to the processes close to shallow marine shelf setting (Boggs 2001).
Mudstone (MS) facies comprises of two subordinate litofacies. These are the silty-shale and shale sub-lithofacies. Silty-shale sub-lithofacies is made up of dark gray colored, highly fissile shales with siltstone interlamination (lamina is about 2.0 mm). This sub-lithofacies appears to be heterolithic in nature, quite extensive in occurrence and are well exposed in the basal parts of Amaseri, Akpoha, Ibii and Ozara–Ukwu outcrop sections (Figs. 5e and 7g, i). Shale sub-lithofacies varied from slightly silty, laminated, brown shales to highly calcareous, fossiliferous, marine, gray shales. Another group of shales observed in outcrop were red, green, and purple mottled, calcareous shales. Lithofacies thickness varies from 0.5 to about 4 m. These outcrop at the basal and upper parts of Ozara–Ukwu, Afikpo and Ngodo Hill sections. The mudstone (MS) facies (silty-shale and shale sub-lithofacies) indicates deposits that may have formed as a result of tidal differences (Reyment 1965). This also reflects suspension deposit in low-energy settings below storm wave base (Banerjee 1980 and Boggs 2001).
BSt facies are made of light gray to brown calcareous siltstone unit associated with very fine-grained sandstone units and calcite mineralized veins/veinlets and surfaces (Fig. 7e). They are intensely bioturbated and burrowed by Skolithos ichnofossils and Planolites ichnofossils (Fig. 7c, h). These ichofossils belong to the Skolithos ichnofacies and Cruziana ichnofacies respectively, which are softground substrate-controlled, found in high and medium energy marine environments (Pemberton et al. 1992). Their thicknesses are in the range of 0.1 to 0.5 m. In thin section, the facies shows the presence of quartz (45 %), feldspar (25 %), calcite (27 %), rock fragment (1 %) and accessory minerals (2 %), such as biotite (Fig. 10i). This outcrops at the basal and upper parts of Akpoha and Ibii section (Fig. 7b, c, d, h).
BSs facies consists of yellowish to reddish brown, bioturbated, pebbly medium to coarse-grained sandstone units. They are characterized by the presence of Thallassinoides and Ophiomorpha burrows that belong to the Glossifungites and Skolithos ichnofacies, respectively. These ichnofacies are dwelling burrows of deposit and suspension feeder found within the shoreface to offshore marine environments (Frey et al. 1990). These burrows and bioturbation disturbed original sedimentation features and somewhat homogenized the sediment, giving it a massive appearance. This facies suggests deposits of fully marine condition with sediments deposited below fair weather wave base (Pemberton et al. 1992). They outcrop at the Afikpo and Ngodo Hill sections (Fig. 8l, m).
PPLS facies consists of mainly gray to brown colored fine and medium-grained sandstone units with thin-bedded laminations of 0.01 to 0.20 m thick. The sandstone units of this facies show planar or parallel laminated primary sedimentary structures with no observable burrows nor bioturbation (Fig. 8e). They occur within the coarsening and thickening-upward facies succession. PPLS facies are well exposed at Akpoha, Ibii and Ozara–Ukwu sections. The PPLS facies suggest deposition under upper flow-regime, typical of plane-bed conditions in marine setting (Miall 1978, 1996; Blatt et al. 1980).
Cross-bedded sandstone (CBS) facies comprises of four (4) sub-facies. These include the following: (i) tabular cross-bedded or planar-bedded sandstone; (ii) trough cross-bedded sandstone; (iii) herringbone cross-bedded sandstone; and (iv) hummocky cross-bedded sandstone (Fig. 8a, b, c, f). The CBS facies consist of a grayish brown, fine, medium and coarse-grained sandstone. They are moderately well to poorly sorted, with pebbly and conglomeritic beds at some sections. The thickness is in the range of 1.0 to 6.0 m. They are characterized by planer cross-beds with tangential contacts, trough cross-beds, herringbone cross-beds and hummocky cross-bed structures. The CBS facies outcrops at the basal, middle and upper parts of the Ozara-Ukwu and Afikpo sections. The CBS facies are formed by the migration of straight to sinuous crested dunes or bars (Miall 1978, 1996; Kendall 2005 and Nichols 2009). Tabular cross-bedding is formed mainly by migration of large-scale, straight-crested ripples and dunes. The foreset laminae of tabular cross-beds are curved so as to become tangential to the basal surface. It forms during lower flow regimes (Boggs 2006). Trough cross-bedded sandstone are associated with sand dune migration, with foreset beds that are curved and merge tangentially with the lower surface. The herringbone cross-bedded sandstones are formed in tidal areas, which have bidirectional flow, and structures are formed with alternating layers of cross-beds dipping in opposite directions that reflect the alternating paleocurrent (Nichols 2009). Hummocky stratification apparently is formed most commonly by re-deposition below normal fair-weather wave base of fine sand delivered offshore by flooding rivers and scour of the shoreface or shoals by large waves (Dott and Bourgeois 1982). Deposition involves both fallout from suspension and lateral tractive flow due to wave oscillation.
RLS facies consists of mainly grayish-brown pebbly and conglomeritic clayey sandstone and fine-grained sandstone units. The thickness of RLS facies ranges from 0.1 to 3.5 m. They are characterized by wave ripple laminated structures (Fig. 8i). They outcrop at Ozara–Ukwu and Ngodo Hill sections. The RLS represents sediment deposits formed at lower flow regime condition in marine setting (Miall 1978, 1996; Blatt et al. 1980).
Conglomeritic sandstone (CS) facies is made up of brown to reddish-brown muddy conglomeritic sandstone. The lithofacies thickness varies from 0.5 to 4 m. The sandstone units are pebbly to cobbly and are characterized by vertical Ophiomorpha (Skolithos Ichnofossil) and horizontal Thalassinoides burrows (Glossifungites ichnofossil) (Fig. 8h, j). This CS facies is seen at the Ozara–Ukwu, Afikpo and Ngodo Hill section with a coarsening/thickening facies succession. Conglomeritic sandstone facies (CS) consists of Thalassinoides-bearing muddy sandstone that belongs to Glossifungites ichnofacies and Ophiomorpha-bearing sandstone which belongs to Skolithos ichnofacies. This lithofacies suggests sediment deposited as transgressive lag above firm ground in a shallow sandy shoreline (Pemberton et al. 1992; MacEachern and Pemberton 1994).
Facies associations
Identified lithofacies were grouped into five (5) genetically related facies associations (comprising dominant and subordinate lithofacies) to aid paleo-depositional environment interpretation. This grouping was based on observed vertical facies succession, lateral facies transition, nature and geometry of bedding contacts, sedimentary structures and gross mineralogical composition. Overall, interpreted facies associations broadly reflect deposition in a tide-influenced, storm wave-dominated shelf setting. Figure 12 shows the spatial distribution of these facies associations and their environments of deposition.
Facies association (FA) 1—oxygenated offshore/open shelf deposits
This facies association is dominated by the mottled, gray, laminated shale sub-facies, and dark-gray, fissile interlaminated silty-shale sub-lithofacies of MS facies. This association typically marks the base of the studied sections, extending laterally across the study area. The observed mottled appearance is the result of intense biogenic activity and points to deposition within oxygenated, low-energy environmental conditions, which allowed marine organisms to thrive (Pemberton et al. 1992). Also, the laminated nature of the shale further suggests deposition within a mostly low-energy setting, probably below fair-weather and storm wave base (Boggs 2001).
Facies association (FA) 2—storm wave-dominated shelf deposits
This facies association is dominated by moderately to poorly sorted, high consolidated medium–coarse-grained sandstone of MCS facies; hummocky cross-bedded sandstone sub-lithofacies-4 (CBS), BSs facies, BSt facies and PPLS facies. The association of FA 2 with FA 1 suggests deposition in an adjacent environment, inferred to be a storm wave-dominated shelf. Sand input was probably initiated during periodic storm events, which generated shallow water turbidity currents on the shelf (c.f. Walker 1985, Pattison et al. 2007). The reduced feldspar content of MCS facies and dominance of quartz may indicate storm wave reworking of adjacent shoreface deposits and redeposition as shelfal “turbidites” or tempestites, mainly during relative sea level fall (c.f. Wonham et al. 2014). Indeed, storm deposits are similar in character to turbidity current deposits, only differentiated by the preservation of hummocks and/or swales in the rock record (Einsele 2000; Karim 2007). BSt and BSs facies developed below fair-weather wave base and above storm wave base, during quieter periods following storm events. The zone described herein has also been referred to as the “lower shoreface” zone (Weise 1980) and the “offshore transition” zone (Walker and Plint 1992).
Facies association (FA) 3—shoreface deposits
This facies association is dominated by amalgamated, coarsening and thickening-upward, medium-grained planar and trough cross-bedded sandstone sub-lithofacies of CBS facies, wave-RLS facies, and fine to medium-grained PPLS facies, which in most parts directly overlie offshore mudstones (FA 1) and/or hummocky cross-stratified sandstones (FA 2). The occurrence of symmetrical wave, wave-ripple laminated sandstone suggests deposition/reworking by oscillatory wave processes or wave reworking of tractional current ripples that dominate in the upper shoreface environment, above fair-weather wave base (Gowland 1996), while observed coarsening and thickening-upward trend suggest increasing energy level during progradation/shoaling (c.f. Ekwenye et al. 2014). Planar and trough cross-beds, horizontal to low-angle planar parallel laminations, wave ripples and prominent Ophiomorpha burrows are interpreted to be the result of vigorous current and wave activity, which compares favorably with that found in the upper shoreface zone of intermediate to high-energy wave coasts of Howard and Reineck (1979, 1981). Non-amalgamated sandstone units that are occasionally moderately bioturbated and interbedded with siltstone units (BSt, BSs and FS facies) were probably deposited in the lower shoreface setting.
Facies association (FA) 4—tidal inlet/lagoonal deposits
Observed herringbone cross-bedded units (CBS facies, Fig. 8a) and fine sandstone – siltstone/shale couplet described for FS facies are interpreted to have been deposited as bars within tidal inlets. Subordinate facies include planar cross-bedded sandstone sub-lithofacies (CBS) and trough cross-bedded sandstone sub-lithofacies (CBS). Bimodal current (herringbone) patterns are the result of opposing and alternating flood and ebb tidal currents, although these are of minor occurrence within the study area. More commonly preserved are unimodal current patterns that suggest a southwesterly dominant net sand transport direction and a weaker opposing direction. Abundant mud drapes, preserved at the foresets of cross-beds during low-tide periods and the occasional heterolithic bedding, are a common feature of tide-influenced depositional environments (c.f. Hassan et al. 2013). Associated with the tidal inlet deposits are gray colored, highly fossilferous lime-mud bed with broken-up bivalves and brachiopod shell fragments (facies BcL). Mineralogically, they are classified as packestones (Table 1) using the Dunham (1962) scheme. The limestone beds are thought to have accumulated in transgressive shallow waters (patch reef deposits), but were subsequently broken up and washed into adjacent lagoon by wave and tide action.
Facies association (FA) 5—fluvial channel deposits
This facies association is dominated by reddish-brown muddy conglomeritic sandstone (facies CS), trough and planar cross-bedded sandstone sub-lithofacies (CBS). Subordinate lithofacies include planar parallel and ripple laminated sandstone facies (PPLS and RLS). On a finer scale, the muddy conglomeritic sandstone typically marks the base of erosive channel-like structures. However, overall, this facies association is stacked to form coarsening/thickening-upward successions that indicate waxing fluvial currents, typical of fluvial channels settings (Howard and Reineck 1979, 1981). This facies association dominates the Afikpo Sandstone unit.
Discussion
Stratigraphic evolution and provenance
Outcrop studies show that several factors affected sedimentation, thus controlling depositional environments during Cenomanian to Campanian time. The high frequency of sandstone and shale units interstratification across the study area, occurring during the Turonian to Coniancian age (Eze-Aku Group— comprising of Eze-Aku Formation and Amaseri Sandstone in Abakaliki Basin) is an indication of sediments deposited at various episodes of relative sea level changes (Simpsons 1954; Amajor, 1987). This suggests two depositional conditions, namely: (a) marine transgressive episodes, where sandstones/siltstones (typical of nearshore deposit) are being overlain by shale (typical of shallow marine deposit) and limestone (marine deposit) indicating sediment deposition during a time of sea level rise and (b) marine regressive episodes, where marine deposits are overlain by shallower marine and nearshore deposits, indicating sediment deposition during a time of falling sea level (Fig. 1). This conforms to the findings of Ukaegbu and Akpabio (2009). Evidence of tectonic activities (structural deformation which gave rise to folded, tilted and fractured rock units) and magmatism (igneous/intrusive emplacement) observed within the area are geologic features associated with the mid-Santonian tectonic episode that affected the southern Benue Trough (Benkhelil 1989). Major plate reorganization related to the Santonian compressional event (Olade 1975; Benkhelil 1989) led to a change in prevailing depositional environment and the establishment of a fluvial system that shed sediment from the uplifted units into the Campanian (Nkporo Group—Afikpo Formation) Anambra Basin. Relatively undisturbed sediment packages (Afikpo Formation) observed at the southern part of the study area with low stratigraphic dip shows that these sediments were deposited after the deformation stage (Hoque and Nwajide 1985; Murat 1972; Petters 1991; Ojoh 1992).
The study area consists of three (3) lithostratigraphic units deposited during the Turonian to Coniancian (Eze-Aku Group—comprising of Eze–Aku Formation and Amaseri Sandstone) and Campanian age (Nkporo Group—Afikpo Formation) of the Middle–Upper Cretaceous successions of Southeastern Nigeria (Fig. 1). Petrographic studies on some litofacies of Amaseri sandstone show texturally immature sandstones (poor to moderate sorting and angular to sub-angular nature of mineral grain) belonging to the arkosic or feldspathic mineral class on account of the high feldspar content up (to 25 %). The abundance of feldspars (which in many cases weather easily when compared to quartz) may be due to the high feldspar content from parent rock and relatively short distance transport or near-source provenance. These sedimentary materials were probably derived from proximal southeastern basement granites (Oban Massif). This agrees with Hoque and Nwajide (1985) classification, as feldspathic sandstones which were formed during the trough stage in the evolution of the Benue Trough.
Lithofacies and environments of deposition
Lithofacies analysis reveals that the distribution of the ten (10) lithofacies delineated in this study is such that the MS (silty-shale sub-lithofacies), MCS, FS and BcL, BSt lithofacies outcrops mainly in the northern and central parts whereas MS (shale sub-lithofacies), BSs, PPLS, CBS and CS facies outcrops mainly in the southern part. The occurrence of these lithofacies ranges from abundance to common and minor (Table 1). More also the distribution of lithofacies successions across the study area shows a predominance of the following: (i) fining-upwards/thinning-upwards (FU/TnU) succession in the northern and central part, an indication of a deepening or shallow to proximal offshore marine environments (transgressive environment—shoreline advancing landward with time), and (ii) coarsening-upwards/thickening-upwards (CU/TkU) succession towards the southern part, an indication of shoaling or proximal offshore to shallow marine environment (regressive shelf environment—shoreline advancing seaward with time). This does not all agree with the model developed by Banerjee (1980) which classified the facies succession as only a vertical growth in coarsening upward succession typical of sub-tidal sand bars.
In addition, the grouping of these lithofacies and subordinate lithofacies into five (5) facies association gave more insight to the understanding of the environments of deposition. The mudstone–MS lithofacies (silty-shale and shale sub-lithofacies) represents deposits within oxygenated offshore/open shelf (FA 1) in mostly low-energy setting, probably below fair-weather and storm wave base. The medium-coarse-grained sandstone—MCS lithofacies; cross-bedded sandstone—CBS lithofacies (hummocky cross-bedded sandstone sub-lihofacies 4), bioturbated siltstone—BSt lithofacies, bioturbated sandstone—BSs facies and planar-parallel-laminated sandstone—PPLS lithofacies are storm wave-dominated shelf deposits (FA 2). Okoro and Igwe (2014) argued for a deep water depositional environment for observed similar characteristics of this facies association, on the premise that there was a marked absence of sedimentary structures of storm origin. However, the present study shows the occurrence of hummocky cross-stratified sandstones (Fig. 8b), associated with MCS facies. The CBS lithofacies (tabular/planar, trough cross-bedded sandstone sub-lithofacies) and ripple laminated sandstone—lithofacies (wave ripple laminated sandstones) comprises of shorefaces deposits (FA 3) above fair-weather wave base. Subordinate lithofacies such as herringbone cross-bedded sandstones (CBS lithofacies) and bioclastic limestone—BcL lithofacies (transgressive shallow waters deposits, subsequently broken-up and washed into adjacent lagoon by wave and tide action) constitute parts of tidal inlet/lagoonal deposits (FA 4), respectively, in a shelf environment. The occurrence of BcL facies concurs with the work of Hoque (1976), which recorded that the siliciclastic Eze–Aku Formation contains scattered lenses and layers of bioclastic limestone within fine bioturbated silty-sandstone. The conglomeritic sandstone (CS) lithofacies with associated subordinate lithofacies such as CBS, PPLS and RSL indicates fluvial channel deposits (FA 5). Primary sedimentary structures associated with these lithofacies such as laminations and cross-beddings suggest deposition in a shelfal environment. The BSt and BSs lithofacies, characterized by the abundance of Planolites (Cruziana ichnofacies) and multidirectional burrows, suggest deposits of fully marine and that there was sufficient time between energy pulses for fossil fauna to thoroughly colonize the sediment-water interface. The CS lithofacies, which is characterized by the presence of Ophiomorpha burrows (Skolithos ichnofacies), also reflects deposits at the upper shoreface environment whereas the Thallassinoides (Glossifungites ichnofacies) found in unlithified marine littoral and sub-littoral surfaces suggests moderate-energy settings or in areas of somewhat higher energy where semi-consolidated micritic or siliciclastic substrates offer resistance to erosion (Pemberton et al. 1992). Overall, interpreted facies succession and lithofacies association are the result of multiple shoreline regression and transgression and deposition of progradational and retrogradational units, respectively, from the Turonian to end Coniacian. Detailed facies analysis suggests deposition in a mixed tide and storm wave-dominated, thus spanning from the littoral (marginal marine) to sub-littoral (shallow and partly deep marine) environment of depositions (Fig. 12).
Conclusion
Detailed geologic mapping of various outcrop sections (Amaseri, Akpoha, Ibii, Ozara-Ukwu, Afikpo and Ngodo sections) and generated sedimentologic logs integrated with lithofacies analysis have provided useful data for interpreting processes that were prevalent during sediment packages and lithofacies deposition and their environments of deposition (EOD) in southeastern part of the southern Benue Trough. Ten (10) lithofacies with their associated subordinate lithofacies and (5) lithofacies associations delineated across the Amaseri–Ngodo outcrop sections span various environments of deposition. These include sediment packages deposited in the following: (i) oxygenated offshore/open shelf (FA 1) in mostly low-energy setting, probably below fair-weather and storm wave base; (ii) storm wave-dominated shelf deposits (FA 2) in a shelfal environment; (iii) shorefaces deposits (FA 3) above fair-weather wave base; (iv) tidal inlet/lagoonal deposits (FA 4) in a shelf environment; and (v) fluvial channel deposits (FA 5). Furthermore, there is predominance of a fining-upwards/thinning-upwards (FU/TnU), typical of deepening or shallow to proximal offshore marine environments in the northern and central part, and dominance of coarsening-upwards/thickening-upwards (CU/TkU), typical of shoaling or proximal offshore to shallow marine environment in the southern part of the area. Generally, these lithofacies represent sediment package deposited in the littoral (marginal marine) through sub-littoral (shallow and partly deep marine) environment of depositions.
References
Amajor LC (1980) A subtidal bar model for the Eze-Aku sand bodies, Nigeria. J Sediment Geol 25:291–309
Amajor LC (1987) The Eze-Aku sandstone ridge (Turonian) of Southeastern Nigeria: a re-interpretation of their depositional origin. J Min Geol 23:17–26
Banerjee I (1980) A subtidal bar model for the Eze-Aku sandstones, Nigeria. J Sediment Geol 30:133–147
Benkhelil J (1982) Benue trough and the Benue chain. Geol Mag 119:155–168
Benkhelil J (1989) The origin and evolution of the Cretaceous Benue Trough, Nigeria. J Afr Earth Sci 8:251–282
Blatt H, Middleton GV, Murray RC (1980) Origin of sedimentary rocks, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, p. 782
Boggs, S. J., 2001, Principles of sedimentology and stratigraphy. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, 261 p.
Boggs S (2006) Principles of sedimentology and stratigraphy, 4th edn. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, p. 662
Burke KC, Dessauvagie TFJ, Whiteman AJ (1971) Opening of the Gulf of Guinea and geological history of the Benue Depression and Niger Delta. Nat Phys Sci 233:51–55
Dim CIP, Mode AW, Onuoha KM (2014) Lithofacies and depo-environmental implication: an outcrop study of Afikpo area in the southern Benue Trough, Nigeria. In: In: unpublished presentation pack, 50th Annual International Conference and Exhibition. Benin, Nigerian Mining and Geosciences Society, p. 28
Dott RH, Bourgeois J (1982) Hummocky stratification: significance of its variable bedding sequences. Geol Soc Am Bull 93:663–680
Dunham. RJ (1962) Classification of carbonate rock according to depositional texture. In: Ham WE (ed) Classification of carbonate rocks. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir, Tulsa, pp. 108–121
Einsele G (2000) Sedimentary basin: evolution, facies and sediment budget, 2ed edn. Springer, Berlin, p. 792
Ekwenye OC, Nichols GJ, Collinson M, Nwajide SC, Obi GC (2014) A paleogeographic model for the sandstone members of the Imo Shale, Southeastern Nigeria. J Afr Earth Sci 96:190–211
Folk RL (1959) Practical petrographic classification of limestones. Am Assoc Pet Geol Bull 43:1–38
Folk RL (1974) Petrology of sedimentary rocks. Hemphill Publishing Company, Austin, p. 182
Frey RW, Pemberton SG, Saunders TDA (1990) Ichnofacies and bathymetry: a passive relationship. J Paleontol 64:155
Gowland, S., 1996. Facies characteristics and depositional models of highly bioturbated shallow marine siliciclastic strata: an example from the Fulmar Formation (Late Jurassic), UK Central Graben, Geological Society, London, Special Publications. 114(10), p. 185–214.
Grant NK (1971) South Atlantic, Benue Trough and Gulf of Guinea Tripple Junction. Geol Soc Am Bull 22:2295–2298
Hassan MHA, Johnson HD, Allison PA, Abdullah WH (2013) Sedimentology and stratigraphic development of the upper Nyalau Formation (Early Miocene), Sarawak, Malaysia: a mixed wave-and tide-influenced coastal system. J Asian Earth Sci 76:301–311
Hoque M, Nwajide CS (1985) Tectono-sedimentological evolution of an enlongate intracratonic basin (aulacogen): the case of the Benue trough of Nigeria. J Min Geol 21:19–26
Hoque M (1976) Significance of textural and petrographic attributes of several Cretaceous sandstones, Southern Nigeria. J Geol Soc India 17:514–521
Howard JD, Reineck HE (1979) Sedimentary structures of a “high energy” beach to offshore sequence Ventura Port Hueneme area, California, U.S.A. (abstr.). Am Assoc Pet Geol Bull 63:468–469
Howard JD, Reineck HE (1981) Depositional facies of high-energy beach-to offshore sequence: comparison with low-energy sequence. Am Assoc Pet Geol Bull 65:807–830
Karim KH (2007) Possible effect of storm on sediments of upper Cretaceous Foreland Basin: a case study for Tempestite in Tanjero formation, Sulaimanyia area, NE-Iraq. Iraq J Earth Sci 7(2):1–10
Kendall, C. G., 2005.Introduction to sedimentary facies, elements, hierarchy and architecture: a key to determining depositional setting. University of South Carolina. Spring, USC Sequence Stratigraphy Web Site (http://strata.geol.sc.edu).
MacEachern, J. A., and Pemberton, S. G., 1994. Ichnological aspects of incised valley fill systems from the Viking Formation of the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin, Alberta, Canada; in, Incised valley systems—origin and sedimentary sequences, R. Boyd, B. A. Zaitlin, and R. Dalrymple, eds.: Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Special Publication, 51, p. 129–157.
Miall, A. D., 1978. Lithofacies types and vertical profile models in braided river deposits: a summary. In: Miall, A.D., Editor, 1978. Fluvial sedimentology memoir 5, Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists, p 597–604.
Miall AD (1996) The geology of fluvial deposits: sedimentary facies, basin analysis, and petroleum geology, first edn. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, p. 582
Miall, A. D., 2000. Principles of sedimentary basin analysis, 3rd edn.: Springer–Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 616 p.
Murat RC (1972) Stratigraphy and Palaeogeography of the Cretaceous and Lower Tertiary in Southern Nigeria. In: Dessauvagie FJ, Whiteman AJ (eds) African geology. University of Ibadan Press, Ibadan, pp. 251–266
Nichols G., 2009.Sedimentology and stratigraphy. 2nd edn.: Wiley-Blackwell Publications, 419 p.
Nwachukwu SO (1972) The tectonic evolution of the southern portion of the Benue Trough, Nigeria. Geol Mag 109:411–419
Nwajide CS (2013) Geology of Nigeria’s sedimentary basins. CSS Bookshops Ltd, Lagos, p. 565
Offodile ME, 1976. The geology of the Middle Benue Trough, Nigeria. Bulletin of Geological Institution, University of Uppsala, Ph.D. Thesis, 166 p.
Ofoegbu CO (1985) A review of the geology of the Benue Trough of Nigeria. J Afr Earth Sci 3:283–291
Oha, I. A., 2014. Digital image processing and interpretation of Landsat 7 ETM+ data of part of the Lower Benue Trough, Southeastern Nigeria. In: Unpublished Ph.D. Seminar Presentation Pack, University of Nigeria Nsukka, 37 p.
Ojoh KA (1992) The southern part of the Benue Trough (Nigeria) Cretaceous stratigraphy, basin analysis, paleo-oceanography and geodynamic evolution in the equatorial domain of the South Atlantic. Niger Assoc Pet Explor Bull 7(2):131–152
Okoro AU, Igwe EO (2014) Lithofacies and depositional environment of the Amasiri Sandstone, southern Benue Trough, Nigeria. J Afr Earth Sci 100:179–190
Olade MA (1975) Evolution of Nigerian Benue Trough (aulacogen): a tectonic model. Geol Mag 112:575–583
Pattison SAJ, Ainsworth RB, Hoffman TA (2007) Evidence of a cross-shelf transport of fine-grained shelf channels in the Campanian Aberdeen Member, Book Cliffs, Utah, USA. Sedimentology 24:1033–1063
Pemberton SG, MacEachern JA, Frey RW (1992) In: Walker RG, James N (eds) Trace fossil facies models: environmental and allostratigraphic significance, in facies models: response to sea level change. Geological Association of Canada, St. John’s, pp. 47–72
Petters SW (1978) Mid-cretaceous paleoenvironments and biostratigraphy of the Benue Trough, Nigeria. Geol Soc Am Bull 89:151–154
Petters SW (1991) Regional geology of Africa. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 722 p
Reyment RA (1965) Aspects of the geology of Nigeria. The stratigraphy of the Cretaceous and Cenozoic deposits. Ibadan University Press, Ibadan, p. 145
Simpsons A (1954) The geology of parts of Onitsha, Owerri, and the Nigerian coal fields. Geol Surv Nigeria Bull 24:121
Spring, D. and Hansen, O. P., 1998. The influence of platform morphology and sea level on the development of a carbonate sequence: the Harash formation, eastern Sirte Basin, Libya. In: Petroleum geology of North Africa, (D. S. MacGregor, R. T. J. Moody, and D. D. Clark-Lowes, eds.), Geological Society of London, London, Special Publication, No 132, p. 335–353.
Ukaegbu VU, Akpabio IO (2009) Geology and stratigraphy northeast of Afikpo Basin, lower Benue Trough, Nigeria. Pac J Sci Technol 10(1):518–527
Walker, R. G., 1985. Geological evidence for storm transportation and deposition on ancient shelves. In: Shelf sands and sandstone reservoirs (Eds R.W. Tillman, D.J.P. Swift and R.G. Walker), SEPM Short Course Notes. 13, p. 243–302.
Walker RG, Plint AG (1992) Wave and storm-dominated shallow marine systems. In: Walker RG, James NP (eds) Facies models, response to sea level change. Geological Association of Canada, St. John’s, pp. 219–238
Whiteman A (1982) Nigeria: its petroleum geology, resources and potentials, 2. Graham and Trotman Ltd., London, p. 394
Weise BR (1980) Wave-dominated delta systems of the Upper Cretaceous San Miguel Formation, Maverick Basin, South Texas. Bur Econ Geol Univ Tex Austin Rep Inv 107:40
Wonham J, Rodwell I, Lein-Mathisen T, Thomas M (2014) Tectonic control on sedimentation, erosion and redeposition of Upper Jurassic sandstones, Central Graben, North Sea, from Depositional Systems to sedimentary successions on the Norwegian continental margin. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, pp. 473–512
Wright JB (1968) South Atlantic continental drift and the Benue Trough. Tech Phys 6:301–310
Wright JB, Hastings DA, Jones WB, Williams HR (1985) Geology and mineral resources of West Africa. George Allen and Unwin Ltd., London, p. 102
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the Petroleum Technology Development Fund (PTDF) Chair of the University of Nigeria, Nsukka, for sponsoring this research work. We are grateful to the managements of Julius Berger Nigeria, Plc. Marlum Civil Engineering Nigeria Limited and Crush Stone Industry, for allowing us access to their newly exposed quarry sites. We acknowledge the editor-in-chief and two anonymous reviewers for the critical reviews which improved the quality of the paper. The assistance of Mr. Emeka Anigbogu during the field work is also highly appreciated.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Princeton Dim, C...I., Okwara, I.C., Mode, A.W. et al. Lithofacies and environments of deposition within the Middle–Upper Cretaceous successions of Southeastern Nigeria. Arab J Geosci 9, 447 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-016-2486-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-016-2486-7