Abstract
The WRKY transcription factors are one of the well-characterized classes of plant transcription factors, which participated in various biotic and abiotc stress responses. Previous study showed that there are 81 WRKY genes in tomato, wherein a number of SlWRKY genes including SlWRKY39 were significantly up-regulated under salt, drought stress and PstDC3000 infection. However little is known about their physiological role in tomato. In this study, by using a forward genetic approach, we demonstrated transgenic plants over-expressing SlWRKY39 showing enhanced resistance to multiple stress factors including PstDC3000, salt and drought. Transgenic plants accumulated higher level of proline and lower level of malonic dialdehyde. Compared with wild type, the expression of pathogenesis-related genes SlPR1, SlPR1a1 and environmental stress related genes SlRD22, SlDREB2A were up-regulated in the transgenic plants. These results indicated that SlWRKY39 is a positive regulatory component of tomato against biotic and abiotic stress probably via activating the expression of both pathogenesis-related genes and stress related genes.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Agarwal P, Reddy MP, Chikara J (2011) WRKY: its structure, evolutionary relationship, DNA-binding selectivity, role in stress tolerance and development of plants. Mol Biol Rep 38:3883–3896
Cao H, Glazebrook J, Clarke JD, Volko S, Dong X (1997) The Arabidopsis NPR1 gene that controls systemic acquired resistance encodes a novel protein containing ankyrin repeats. Cell 88:57–63
Chen C, Chen Z (2002) Potentiation of developmentally regulated plant defense response by AtWRKY18, a pathogen induced Arabidopsis transcription factor. Plant Physiol 129:706–716
Chen H, Lai ZB, Shi JW, Xiao Y, Chen ZX, Xu XP (2010) Roles of Arabidopsis WRKY18, WRKY40 and WRKY60 transcription factors in plant responses to abscisic acid and abiotic stress. BMC Plant Biol 10:281
Cutt JR, Harpster MH, Dixon DC, Carr JP, Dunsmuir P, Klessig DF (1989) Disease response to tobacco mosaic virus in transgenic tobacco plants that constitutively express the pathogenesisrelated PR1b gene. Virology 173:89–97
Cui M, Zhang WJ, Zhang Q, Xu ZQ, Zhu ZG, Duan FP, Wu R (2011) Induced over-expression of the transcription factor OsDREB2A improves drought tolerance in rice. Plant Physiol Bioch 49:1384–1391
Draper HH, Squires EJ, Mahmoodi H, Wu J, Agarwal S, Hadley M (1993) A comparative evaluation of thiobarbituric acid methods for the determination of malondialdehyde in biological materials. Free Radical Bio Med 15:353–363
Durner J, Shah J, Klessig DF (1997) Salicylic acid and disease resistance in plants. Trends Plant Sci 2:266–274
Durrant WE, Dong X (2004) Systemic acquired resistance. Annu Rev Phytopathol 42:185–209
Eulgem T, Somssich IE (2007) Networks of WRKY transcription factors in defense signaling. Curr Opin Plant Biol 10:366–371
Fillatti JJ, Kiser J, Rose R, Comai L (1987) Efficient transfer of a glyphosate tolerance gene into tomato using a binary Agrobacterium tumefaciens vector. BioTechnol 5:726–730
Glazebrook J (2005) Contrasting mechanisms of defense against biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens. Annu Rev Phytopathol 43:205–227
Hasegawa PM, Bressan RA, Zhu JK, Bohnert HJ (2000) Plant cellular and molecular responses to high salinity. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 51:463–499
Huang SX, Gao YF, Liu JK, Peng XL, Niu XL, Fei ZJ, Cao SQ, Liu YS (2012) Genome-wide analysis of WRKY transcription factors in Solanum lycopersicum. Mol Genet Genomics 287:495–513
Kong X, Pan J, Zhang M, Xing X, Zhou Y, Liu Y, Li D Li D (2011) ZmMKK4, a novel group C mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase in maize (Zea mays), confers salt and cold tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Environ 34:1291–1303
Mittler R, Blumwald E (2010) Genetic engineering for modern agriculture: challenges and perspectives. Annu Rev Plant Biol 61:443–462
Narsai R, Wang C, Chen J, Wu JN, Shou HX, Whelan J (2013) Antagonistic, overlapping and distinct responses to biotic stress in rice (Oryza sativa) and interactions with abiotic stress. BMC Genomics 14:93
Niu CF, Wei W, Zhou QY, Tian AG, Hao YJ, Zhang WK, Ma B, Lin Q, Zhang ZB, Zhang JS, Chen SY (2012) Wheat WRKY genes TaWRKY2 and TaWRKY19 regulate abiotic stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Plant Cell Environ 35:1156–1170
Pandey SP, Somssich IE (2009) The role of WRKY transcription factors in plant immunity. Plant Physiol 150:1648–1655
Pan LP, Jiang L (2014) Identification and expression of the WRKY transcription factors of Carica papaya in response to abiotic and biotic stresses. Mol Biol Rep 41:1215–1225
Qin F, Kakimoto M, Sakuma Y, Maruyama K, Osakabe Y, Tran LS, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (2007) Regulation and functional analysis of ZmDREB2A in response to drought and heat stresses in Zea mays L. Plant J 50:54–69
Sakuma Y, Maruyama K, Osakabe Y, Qin F, Seki M, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (2006) Functional analysis of an Arabidopsis transcription factor, DREB2A, involved in droughtresponsive gene expression. Plant Cell 18:1292–1309
Sambrook J, Russell W R (2001) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 3rd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor
Sathiyaraj G, Lee OR, Parvin S, Khorolragchaa A, Kim YJ, Yang DC (2011) Transcript profiling of antioxidant genes during biotic and abiotic stresses in Panax ginseng C. A. Meyer. Mol Biol Rep 38:2761–2769
Shao HB, Chen XY, Chu LY, Zhao XN, Wu G, Yuan YB, Zhao CX, Hu ZM (2006) Investigation on the relationship of proline with wheat anti-drought under soil water deficits. Colloid Surface B 53:113–119
Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (1996) Molecular responses to drought and cold stress. Curr Opin Biotechnol 7:161–167
Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (1997) Gene expression and signal transduction in water-stress response. Plant Physiol 115: 327–334
Vinocur B, Altman A (2005) Recent advances in engineering plant tolerance to biotic stress: achievements and limitations. Curr Opin Biotechnol 16:123–132
Xing DH, Lai ZB, Zheng ZY, Vinod KM, Fan BF, Chen ZX (2008) Stress- and pathogen-induced Arabidopsis WRKY48 is a transcriptional activator that represses plant basal defense. Mol Plant 459–470
Wang C, Deng P Y, Chen L L, Wang XT, Ma H, Hu W, Yao NC, Feng Y, Chai RH, Yang GX, He GY (2013) A wheat WRKY transcription factor TaWRKY10 confers tolerance to multiple abiotic stresses in transgenic tobacco. PLoS One 8:e65120
Wang HM, Zhou L, Fu YP, Cheung MY, Wong FL, Pang TH, Sun ZX, Lam HM (2012) Expression of an apoplast-localized BURPdomain protein from soybean (GmRD22) enhances tolerance towards abiotic stress. Plant Cell Environ 35:1932–1947
Wildermuth MC, Dewdney J, Wu G, Ausubel FM (2001) Isochorismate synthase is required to synthesize salicylic acid for plant defence. Nature 414:562–565
Wu L, Zhang Z, Zhang H, Wang XC, Huang R (2008) Transcriptional modulation of ethylene response factor protein JERF3 in the oxidative stress response enhances tolerance of tobacco seedlings to salt, drought, and freezing. Plant Physiol 148:1953–1963
Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K (1993) The plant hormone abscisic acid mediates the drought induced expression but not the seed specific expression of rd22, a gene responsive to dehydration stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Gen Genet 238:17–25
Zheng ZY, Mosher SL, Fan BF, Klessig DF, Chen ZX (2007) Functional analysis of Arabidopsis WRKY25 transcription factor in plant defense against Pseudomonas syringae. BMC Plant Biol 7:1–13
Zhou QY, Tian AG, Zou HF, Xie ZM, Lei G, Huang J, Wang CM, Wang HW, Zhang JS, Chen SY (2008) Soybean WRKY-type transcription factor genes, GmWRKY13, GmWRKY21, and GmWRKY54, confer differential tolerance to abiotic stresses in transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Plant Biotechnol J 6:486–503
Zhu JK (2001) Plant salt tolerance. Trends Plant Sci 6:66–71
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sun, Xc., Gao, Yf., Li, Hr. et al. Over-expression of SlWRKY39 leads to enhanced resistance to multiple stress factors in tomato. J. Plant Biol. 58, 52–60 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12374-014-0407-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12374-014-0407-4